• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Germany: “100s of young Muslim men treated women as objects to hunt down….they’re considered fair game and can be raped”

Dec 9, 2016 1:02 pm By Robert Spencer

Bassam Tibi is all over the map: he has written accurately about Islam’s jihad doctrine, but has denied that there is any specifically Islamic antisemitism, despite the fact that the Qur’an depicts the Jews as fabricating things and falsely ascribing them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181), denying Allah’s power (5:64); loving to listen to lies (5:41); disobeying Allah and never observing his commands (5:13); disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); and more. It says they are the worst enemies of the Muslims (5:82) and that Allah transformed Sabbath-breaking Jews into apes and pigs (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166).

Here, however, he is correct in saying that “hundreds of young Muslim men treated women as objects to hunt down. They know what they do is prohibited by law. But they also think German women are sluts. And in addition they know their actions have no consequences. The German police do not fear the refugees, they fear to be branded as racist when dealing with them.” Indeed. The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.

But Tibi is right: German authorities are afraid to acknowledge any of this or to move decisively against Muslim migrant crime, for fear of being called “racist.”

“Syrian-born political scientist says migrants see German women as ‘fair game’ to be raped,” by Katie Mansfield, Express, December 8, 2016

GERMAN women are seen as “prostitutes” and “fair game” by migrants, a top political scientist has warned.

The 72-year-old warned women will be raped by migrants with tensions set to escalate between Germans and immigrants as integration remains a huge problem.

A record 890,000 migrants arrived in Germany last year with alleged sex attacks by migrants soaring in 2016.

Professor Tibi, who moved to Germany from Syria when he was 18, says the current trend is likely to continue.

He said: “German women sleep with men without being married to them. In the eyes of the migrants their behaviour is like that of a prostitute.

“That is why they are considered fair game and can be raped.”

Migrants committed 1,576 sex crimes in Germany in 2015, compared to 1683 in the first six months of this year.

Professor Tibi said: ”Hundreds of young Muslim men treated women as objects to hunt down. They know what they do is prohibited by law.

“But they also think German women are sluts. And in addition they know their actions have no consequences. The German police do not fear the refugees, they fear to be branded as racist when dealing with them.”…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Germany, sexual assault and rape, Sharia Tagged With: Bassam Tibi


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. miriamrove says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 1:13 pm

    women are sluts…. I thought so too. until I came here from Iran. Muslim men are so sex starved and sexes are highly segregated for the reasons we all know. Yet their murderous prophet was into everything from pedophilia to necrophilia and everything else in the middle. Muslims specially Arab muslims are highly uneducated. That said when they are at their s…hole countires and watching American Programs such as Soap and they see that everyone is f… someone else in each different episodes they get that idea. m

    • Kay says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 1:41 pm

      And here we are taught that most people obey the law and that the laws will protect us . . . it used to be mostly true.

      • Mike says

        Dec 9, 2016 at 2:00 pm

        Yeah, it turns out that we get a load of B.S., as well.

        I repeatedly point out that leftist ideology is just as truth-averse as islamist ideology, and just as destructive… and similarly popular.

      • miriamrove says

        Dec 9, 2016 at 2:05 pm

        We do have laws to protect our selves. We are not using them. If we do we are called facsisits/Islamophobe/Right winger/bigots/racist..etc. m

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 9, 2016 at 4:12 pm

          *Exactly*, miriam. We need to start *enforcing our own civilized laws.

      • Bob says

        Dec 10, 2016 at 6:49 am

        Now we have police in the UK who’re afraid of being called islamophobic and racist, so the girls, and the population in general suffers from the attentions of the muzlims!

    • CallMeIshmael says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 5:33 pm

      Thank you Angela Merkel.

  2. HIPS says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 2:45 pm

    Professor Tibi: “German women sleep with men without being married to them” …”That is why they are considered fair game and can be raped”.

    Let’s be completely honest here, wedding ring or no wedding ring, if those muslim’s want to rape you…they will. It’s their religion. Their disgusting, monstrous, devil worshipping religion.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 4:25 pm

      True–culturally conservative Yezidi girls are not being raped in the Islamic State because they are having premarital sex.

      And Islam even has a provision for married women–if they are married to Infidels, their marriages are considered null and void if they are captured by Muslim men, and they can be raped with impunity.

      Muslims make much of targeting the West because it is so supposedly decadent; but, really, all unbelievers are fair game.

    • Michael Copeland says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 5:10 pm

      Exactly, HIPS. Muslim men do as INSTRUCTED:
      “Their women are yours to take, legitimately. Allah made them yours.”
      Sheikh Saad al Beraik.
      “Taking” kafir women is all part of imposing Islam by force.

  3. Hindu American says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 3:23 pm

    Where are the German men? Asleep or cowering behind political correctness? Shouldn’t they stand up and fight to protect their women and children?

    According to Tibi – the current trend is likely to continue. Well, what are the good Germans going to about it?

    • andra says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 7:04 am

      There are many so called conservative German men who would just look the other way if they were witness of an attack. They whine that they have been castrated by feminism and are no more able to act like men.They only amuse themselves with picking some Asian women from catalogues.

      • TheOldOligarch says

        Dec 10, 2016 at 11:39 am

        Well…something has clearly happened between now and the 1940s. If it wasn’t the declared and concerted effort to beat masculinity out of men (feminism) then what was it?

  4. gravenimage says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 3:33 pm

    Germany: “100s of young Muslim men treated women as objects to hunt down….they’re considered fair game and can be raped”
    ………………………..

    This is exactly what we are seeing in Germany and the rest of Europe–especially as happened on New Year’s Eve.

    The mass arson of automobiles has become a “tradition” in France on New Year’s Eve–will the mass rape of women be another Muslim “tradition” ringing in the New Year?

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 2:36 am

      If the German police were smart, they would be arranging a mass of ‘sting ops’ to be conducted during the Christmas-New Year period.

      Sweet young ladies in public places… sweet young ladies who were NOT as unprotected and all alone as they appeared.

      *Bait*. And then then when the mohammedan mobsters went to gobble up the bait…BOOM! down would come the hammer and the mohammedan mobsters would be clapped up in jug so fast they wouldn’t know what happened to them.

      • andra says

        Dec 10, 2016 at 7:20 am

        You bet the German judges would let them go as free men, because it were mean by the Police to set up this trap.

        • Veka Fitzfrancis says

          Dec 10, 2016 at 12:12 pm

          Easier answer would be for the ladies to carry guns.

  5. Angemon says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 3:36 pm

    He said: “German women sleep with men without being married to them. In the eyes of the migrants their behaviour is like that of a prostitute.

    “That is why they are considered fair game and can be raped.”

    I’m certain German “feminists” are lining up now to sit down with the “migrants” and politely teach them what “consent” means…

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 4:26 pm

      Of course, there is no real concept of consent in Islam.

  6. Jack Diamond says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 4:25 pm

    “German women sleep with men without being married to them. In the eyes of the migrants their behaviour is like that of a prostitute.

    “That is why they are considered fair game and can be raped.”

    Crap. They have no idea who the women sleep with, let alone the young girls, and don’t care. Kaffirs rate as less than cattle. Kaffir women are taken as booty, spoils of war, and sex with captive women is absolutely allowed in Islam. Islam is at perpetual war with dar al-harb anyway, add to that the present conflicts (infidel self-defense constituting war on Islam). Islamic law is even clear that in foreign countries, in dar al-harb, there is no punishment for a Muslim’s sexual misbehavior (see the Hedaya, for example, no punishment for zina or adultery committed in a “foreign country”). All of this is normative behavior by Muslims, has been for centuries, having zero to do with whether infidel wives cheat on their husbands…or show off their skin…or any other excuse to call them whores.

    ”Hundreds of young Muslim men treated women as objects to hunt down. They know what they do is prohibited by law.” But not Islamic law, right Professor? And now they’ve learned they can get away with it under German law, too.

    • Jack Diamond says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 4:46 pm

      And the idea kaffir marriages are respected is ludicrous given that her marriage is nullified the moment she becomes a Muslim’s captive, according to Islam’s law.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 5:25 pm

      Fine post, Jack.

    • marsfeld says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 10:28 am

      I regard this a tad differently. It’s true muslim rapists would just rape anybody kuffar, as they are allowed to by the “sciptures” of their “prophet”, regardless of the actual lifestyle of their victims, even if it’s some shy virgin / completely conservative christian helper in a refugee camp, for example.

      Still, I don’t really think you can take their dumb dogma about all non-muslims being these depraved “fornicators” completely out of the equation. First off, isn’t it appalling that we often unconsciously somehow dumb down the debate for those “poor rapists” arguing somewhat like: “Hey, you couldn’t rape THESE women. They weren’t sluts. They didn’t dress sexy etc.” – as if we would be fine with the rapes if they would just cling to perceived “loose” women or even sexworkers? I mean, even this approach is somewhat of a case of “creeping sharia” and us already getting dragged down into the obnoxious mindsets of these islamic narratives about chastity and women rights. (I’m not saying at all I could find this flawed argumentation strategy in your comment, I just mention this, because I often encountered people going down this crooked road of reasoning when trying to debate muslims on their misogyny!)

      I think even if a woman had the chance in a (ridiculous) hypothetical rape situation to completely proof her absolute chastity, showing him her marriage certificate, pictures of her being a traditional housewife with children and so on, he would just continue with the rape, because he just won’t let his dogma about ALL non-western women to be these horrible sluts who deserve rape be irritated by clear reality or facts. I think those rapists of course get aroused by the thought of all those western girls being “loose women” and they clearly have this idea of them being all fornicators in their sexually and intellectually warped minds and this is something that motivates them in their crimes.

      As most here will know, the reasoning with these kinds of muslims is a very sad and tedious affair, as no factual evidence ever affects their dogmatic mental opinion structure in their head. It’s like in these situations when you are trying to tell them – for example – you aren’t really christian, come from a sceptical background etc, and he will still condemn you for being a crusader and are doing shirk because of the trinity theorem all the time without even listening to anything you say. He will just think what is most useful to think for him to excuse himself acting like the lowest pos on earth, as he feels entitled to by his religious and cultural upbringing.

      In my opinion, that’s just a consequence of a culture that systematically strangles logical thought and follows the ideals of dogmatic authoritarianism in regard to any religious or traditional norm. As you will be tortured in hell for eternity for even doubting a law of the “prophet” for a second, can anyone say he’s surprised those rapist low lifes think this illogical way?

  7. Stephanie says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 4:38 pm

    0:50 ‘… LYING MEDIA’ ‘IMpure’ UNbeliever quran.com/8/37 , 55
    taken as sex slave http://quran.com/4/3 , 24

    https://twitter.com/schnellmann_org/status/807318425391550464

  8. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 5:52 pm

    robert spencer,what about your the mithraist evil bible(the book of genocide and phornography)which commands you to kill all(in religious war), including women and children with exception of girls who did not know men which you can keep as sex slaves.history has accurately recorded that church men maintained concubines from war captives and those they bought from slave markets.some apologist liars among us told us that those verses of genocide,slavery and concubinage in the bible are descriptive of what israelites did.but the verses are giving command to do all these; and the church did in fact waged religious war ,took women as war captives and made them sex slaves.in the quran there is no word command to take girls as war captives to be made a sex slave.but islamic scholars drew inference from quranic verses encouraging muslims to free their slaves to get abundant rewards from allah and the verse talking about lawful sexual relationship to include sex with concubine woman and concluded that it is lawful to own male slave and female slave for sex(concubine). but such encouragement to free war captive slaves(male and female),slavery will vanish and it happened.see ali mazrui :african slavery series. on evil jews, the quran truly described jews as people associated with evils like treachery,lies and deceptions; and they have been doing it uptil now.can mr spencer dispute that?mr spencer, are saying when you say what someone is actually doing is hatred against him?no,you are only telling him to stop those bad habits.again, jews are not the only semetic family.why any talk about jews is refered to as anti-semetism?what about arabs?quran even refered to some arabs as hypocrites and they are.no arab complain that islam is anti-arab

    • mortimer says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 6:02 pm

      ibrahim itace muhammed writes to justify crimes against humanity. He is a perfect example of the mentality described in the article above.

      Islam is a supremacist doctrine. What does a supremacist want?

    • billybob says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 6:41 pm

      Ibrahim – there is no religion called “the Bible”. There is, however, a religion called Christianity. This religion was founded by Christ, and based on his teachings. Christ was a man of peace, love, and humility, sentiments that are sorely lacking in Islam. You can find his teachings in the part of the Bible called the “New Testament”. There is another part of the Bible called the “Old Testament”. This contains stories handed down by oral tradition over millennia. It has no authority except for that which Christ gives it.
      Christ commanded none of the things you speak of. I don’t know where you get those ridiculous ideas.

    • kangi_yotaka says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 7:25 pm

      “The root word Semite gives the false impression that antisemitism is directed against all Semitic people. However, the compound word antisemite was popularized in Germany in 1879 as a scientific-sounding term for Judenhass “Jew-hatred”, and that has been its common use since then.” (wikipedia; they link to sources.)

      From the Online Etymology Dictionary, http://www.etymonline.com:
      “Anti-semitism: also antisemitism, 1881, from German Antisemitismus, first used by Wilhelm Marr (1819-1904) German radical, nationalist and race-agitator, who founded the Antisemiten-Liga in 1879.”

      From Britannica:
      “Anti-Semitism, hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious or racial group. The term anti-Semitism was coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm Marr to designate the anti-Jewish campaigns under way in central Europe at that time.”

      Wiktionary:
      “Though Semitic refers in a broader sense to all those who speak Semitic languages (including e.g. Arabs and Assyrians), the term anti-Semitism has historically referred to prejudice against Jews alone. To avoid the confusion of the misnomer, many scholars of the subject (such as Emil Fackenheim) now favor the unhyphenated antisemitism in order to emphasize that the word should be read as a single unified term, not as a meaningful root word-prefix combination.(See Wikipedia’s article on the etymology and usage of the term.) Use of the term to refer to prejudice against any Semitic people is rare and nonstandard.”

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 11:39 pm

      Appalling apologist for Muslim savagery ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:

      robert (sic) spencer,what (sic) about your the mithraist (sic) evil bible(the (sic) book of genocide and phornography)which (sic) commands you to kill all
      ……………………………..

      Even were this the case–which it is not–no Jews or Christians are raping, enslaving, of murdering unbelievers in the name of their faith. Would that one could say the same about Islam.

      More:

      history (sic) has accurately recorded that church men maintained concubines from war captives and those they bought from slave markets.
      ……………………………..

      What “history” would this be? Citations, meretricious Mohamedan.

      More:

      some (sic) apologist liars among us told us that those verses of genocide,slavery (sic) and concubinage in the bible are descriptive of what israelites (sic) did.but (sic) the verses are giving command to do all these; and the church did in fact waged (sic) religious war ,took (sic) women as war captives and made them sex slaves (sic).
      ……………………………..

      Does muhammed understand that he has to back up his wild claims with actual facts?

      But then, why would a Muslim think that he actually has to marshal facts?

      More:

      in (sic) the quran (sic) there is no word command to take girls as war captives to be made a sex slave.
      ……………………………..

      This is, of course, entirely false. Sex slaves are Milk al-Yameen, the “Possessions of the Right Hand”. The Qur’an is full of references to how they can be raped by Muslim men:

      Quran (33:50) – “O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee” This is one of several personal-sounding verses “from Allah” narrated by Muhammad – in this case allowing a virtually unlimited supply of sex partners. Other Muslims are restricted to four wives, but they may also have sex with any number of slaves, following the example of their prophet.

      Quran (23:5-6) – “..who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess…” This verse permits the slave-owner to have sex with his slaves.

      Quran (4:24) – “And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” Even sex with married slaves is permissible.

      Quran (8:69) – “But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good” A reference to war booty, of which slaves were a part. The Muslim slave master may enjoy his “catch” because (according to verse 71) “Allah gave you mastery over them.”

      More:

      but (sic) islamic (sic) scholars drew inference from quranic (sic) verses encouraging muslims (sic) to free their slaves to get abundant rewards from allah (sic) and the verse talking about lawful sexual relationship to include sex with concubine woman and concluded that it is lawful to own male slave and female slave for sex(concubine) (sic).
      ……………………………..

      The “Prophet” Muhammed himself took sex slaves, was in the slave trade, and raped sex slaves.

      More:

      but (sic) such encouragement to free war captive slaves(male and female),slavery (sic) will vanish and it happened.
      ……………………………..

      But it hasn’t. There is no concept of abolition in Islam; abolition of slavery happened in the Christian West. There was no Muslim Wilberforce or Tubman.

      The Muslim world only curtailed slavery to the extent that they did due to pressure from the civilized West. There were open slave markets in Riyadh when I was a young child.

      To this day, 17% of the population of Mauritania is enslaved. Muslims are enslaving Christians and animists in Sudan; I met one victim who had been able to escape.

      And slavery is *resurgent* in Dar-al-Islam–muhammed’s coreligionists are using Christian and Yezidi girls as sex slaves in the Islamic State.

      More:

      see ali mazrui :african (sic) slavery series. on evil jews (sic), the quran (sic) truly described jews (sic) as people associated with evils like treachery,lies (sic) and deceptions; and they have been doing it uptil (sic) now.can mr (sic) spencer (sic) dispute that?mr (sic) spence (sic), are saying when you say what someone is actually doing is hatred against him?no,you (sic) are only telling him to stop those bad habits.again, (sic) jews (sic) are not the only semetic (sic) family.why (sic) any talk about jews (sic) is refered (sic) to as anti-semetism?what (sic) about arabs?quran (sic) even refered (sic) to some arabs (sic) hypocrites and they are.no (sic) arab (sic) complain that islam (sic) is anti-arab (sic)
      ……………………………..

      Islam as a matter of fact is Arab supremacist.

      More importantly, though, is that while muhammed is ranting about “evil jews”, note that he has *no problem* with Muslims hunting down and raping Infidel women in Europe.

      Does he have a problem with rape Jihad? Will he condemn his coreligionists considering Kuffar women in Europe fair game for rape?

      I ask him to condemn Muslims mass raping women in Europe–but I will not, of course, be holding my breath for him to do so.

    • andra says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 7:26 am

      You have not understood the difference between a historic descriptive text as the BIble and the Koran which is – as Muslims say – unchangeable. So, the Koran demands, the Bible describes. That is a great difference.
      And, by the way, nobody ever said that Christians are without sin or guilt. But the difference to Islam is that Islam does not refer to the rape or muirder of infidels als guilt or sin.

  9. Leitkultur says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 6:18 pm

    Tibi has created also the word LEITKULTUR years ago(Leadingculture)-funny all Leftwingers cried about this Rightwing,racist,nazi word….

    Afghan police rape and murder children.

  10. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 7:13 pm

    billybob, check your bible well.it is there unless you are too lazy to read.if you are concern less with the bible,where will you find jesus’s teachings?from your head?was jesus as your god not the originator of new testament and old testament as he confirmed that he did not come to abolish the old testament and the prophets?you can’t hide.you have to own your book the bible or else you are not a christian.is that part of deceptions christians are known when they wrapped such verses with quranic cover to deceive readers that they are from the quran?

    • billybob says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 9:43 pm

      Ibrahim – the essence of Christianity is Jesus Christ. He upheld the Law, like the Ten Commandments. He wasn’t “the originator” of any part of the Bible though. The New Testament is about him, not by him. Nor did he dictate any part of it. It wasn’t like Muhammad dictating the Quran. The New Testament reports his actions and his teachings. In a sense, it’s as if you had only Hadiths and no Quran.

      What Christ taught was such a radical departure from the Old Testament that that book has to be completely reinterpreted in light of Jesus’s teachings. Now to be honest with you, there are many who profess to be Christian but will have a different take on things than I do, but I am prepared any time, any where, to defend my thesis that Christianity is Jesus and the Old Testament is only relevant where it supports Jesus’s teachings. Jesus was a good man, to say the least. He was, in fact, without sin, and the perfect example to follow.

      Finally, you say something that seems incoherent: “Is that part of deceptions christians are known when they wrapped such verses with quranic cover to deceive readers that they are from the quran?” That just doesn’t make any sense to me. You must know bloody well what is in the Quran, and it is pretty horrible. I’m not a Quranic scholar by any stretch of the imagination, but I know how to do a Google search and in 5 minutes I could quote you chapter and verse from the Quran that would chill your blood. However, I won’t bother to quote even one verse, because you certainly well know what kind of horrors are there in your own gd’damed Quran.

    • EYESOPEN says

      Dec 9, 2016 at 10:24 pm

      The Old Testament of the Bible was mostly DESCRIPTIVE, and is pretty much a history lesson – and a fore-telling of Jesus Christ (Almighty God Himself) coming to Earth as a man. That it is what it is is due to mans’ fallen nature.

      The New Testament of the Bible is about the life of Jesus Christ on Earth; and His purpose to teach how to live to please God, to perform miracles so that at least some among us would know who and what He is, and to most of all offer Himself as ransom for fallen mankind.

      Remember – this is Almighty God Himself offering Himself as ransom. Almighty God is merciful, but He is also just – and payment for sin there must be. Since the result of payment for mans’ sin would entail the “Second Death”: eternal damnation, and removal from God’s presence forever, Almighty God chose a unique and God-like solution. HE would pay that ransom – out of love for the Humans that He created. THAT is the message of the New Testament. The later chapters are about the lives of Jesus Christ’s apostles upon this Earth. The last chapter… Revelation.

      Try the New Testament of the Holy Bible. It sure is a comfort to know that, instead of a manipulative, hateful and hating god: “allah”, there is Almighty God – our Creator – who wants us to love and serve Him of our OWN accord, since He gave us free will to make that choice – or not. This is the same God who wants us to be in Heaven with Him for all eternity.

      • EYESOPEN says

        Dec 9, 2016 at 10:25 pm

        Sorry. I did not make it clear. My post above was for “ibrahim”.

        • billybob says

          Dec 9, 2016 at 10:32 pm

          We got that.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 12:26 am

      Vile Muslim apologist ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:

      billybob, check your bible well.it (sic) is there unless you are too lazy to read.
      ………………………….

      Of course, this Mohammedan understands nothing about the Bible.

      More:

      if (sic) you are concern less with the bible,where (sic) will you find jesus’s (sic) teachings?from (sic) your head?was jesus (sic) as your god not the originator of new testament and old testament as he confirmed that he did not come to abolish the old testament and the prophets?you (sic) can’t hide.you have to own your book the bible or else you are not a christian.
      ………………………….

      For anyone who wonders what muhammed is on about here, he has said how enraged he is that Jews and Christians are not murdering gay people and stoning women to death, and is trying to tell Christians that they are not really Christians if they don’t indulge in such Muslim savagery.

      More:

      is (sic) that part of deceptions christians (sic) are known when they wrapped such verses with quranic (sic) cover to deceive readers that they are from the quran (sic)?
      ………………………….

      Muslims are engaging in savagery, on the basis of the Qur’an, the Hadith, and the model of the vicious “Prophet”.

      Christians are not murdering people on the model of Jesus, because Jesus did not murder people. So sorry to disappoint the Mohammedan…sarc/off

  11. dumbledoresarmy says

    Dec 9, 2016 at 11:48 pm

    Each and every female who is not Islamically dressed – who is, therefore, by definition, ‘uncovered meat’ – is viewed as fair game. As lawful prey for mohammedan men.

    It doesn’t matter whether she is 8, or 80.

    She *might* be a prostitute – in Canberra, infidel prostitutes have been cheated and raped by Mohammedan ‘customers’ who reneged upon the ‘deal’, by 1/ taking the goods without payment and 2/ to add insult to injury, **robbing** their victims.

    But she might be an underaged schoolgirl – like the little girl hostages at Beslan, who by no stretch of the imagination could possibly be regarded as ‘immodest’ or as ‘sluts’ – but who were framed as such, by the depraved Mohammedan mind, and, therefore, *raped*.

    She might be a nun; a pious Amishwoman; a soccer mom in jeans and T-shirt. She might be in a bikini or a nun’s habit… she might be a young modern woman who has had a few (consensual) lovers, or someone like myself who has only ever slept with one man, my husband. But the thing we have to get through our heads is that it *doesn’t matter*.

    *Any* infidel female is Prey. *Any* unislamically dressed woman – **no matter** how modestly dressed she may be, by *our* standards, right up to and including a nun’s habit (nuns have, in past jihad sackings of Christian cities, been dragged out of the convents, and raped repeatedly, by Muslims) – is Prey. They see us as sluts and whores because we are not Muslim. That’s all.

    Getting sidetracked by thinking that ‘our’ ‘decadence’ is somehow provoking or attracting Mohammedan rape gangs, is just that: a sidetrack. A distraction. It prevents us from seeing the sheer horror of what is going on: Musilm predation directed at *all* Infidels qua infidels, for no other reason than sheer lawless lust, sacralised and commanded by the Mohammedan death cult.

    If *every* woman in Germany was either an Amishwoman or a Catholic nun, if *every* woman and girl in Germany was absolutely ‘virtuous’ by the strictest infidel standards of historic Christian morality, **the Muslim rapes would still be happening**. Just as much as now.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 12:27 am

      *Exactly*, DDA.

    • andra says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 7:35 am

      It could not be said better. Thanks for your post.

    • andra says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 7:36 am

      dumbledoresarmy, may I translate your post on my German blog?

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Dec 10, 2016 at 1:16 pm

        Yes. Go for it! Translate and circulate.

        And while you’re at it, here’s a tag-line that you could also translate and circulate – “Got Muslims? Got Jihad”.

  12. JW_reader says

    Dec 10, 2016 at 12:04 am

    They are everywhere

    • billybob says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 8:54 am

      That was interesting. KVLY-TV channel 11 is the NBC affiliate for Fargo, North Dakota, serving eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota, along the “Red River Valley” – according to Wikipedia. It seems there they tell the truth about Islam. You may have noticed this Muslim who raped the girl did it “correctly” according to Islamic principles because he “married” her for the duration – saying “You are my wife”. He also properly gave praise to Satan when he shouted “Allahu ackbar”. After, there was a report about some protest made about Syrian immigrants who made include ISIS operatives and cannot be properly vetted.
      There is a crack in the Democratic Dome appearing!

  13. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Dec 10, 2016 at 8:56 am

    eyesopen,that concept of god(jesus)offering himself as ransom for the fallen mankind was evolved from roman paganism of mithraism of old inspired by the devil.christianity as it was handed down up to today emerged in 325 ad after original jesus(prophet isa alaihissalam)ddeparture from this earth uring the reing of constantine where some hearsay stories about prophet isa(the genuine one)were mixed withmithraism of old and jesus was elevated to the status of god himself like mithra.see bart erhman on how christianity was invented for more detail. thus,the concept of blood atonement is full of flaws.how can you hold an innocent son responsible for the sin committed by his parents?is there any sense of justice in this judgement?allah dismissed it in the quran that one cannot bear the burden of another.god is just and cannot be expected to punish some one for the sin committed by another without any conspiracy to do it.hence, the concept of god offering himself as ransom for the fallen mandkind has to fall like cardhouse, because it has no base to stand.you cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay;it has to fall.

    • andra says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 9:26 am

      I still don´t understand in what way your posts are connected to the threat Islam means for Christians and all other religions and non-believers worldwide.

    • billybob says

      Dec 10, 2016 at 9:44 am

      Ibrahim says…

      “That concept of god (Jesus) offering himself as ransom for the fallen mankind was evolved from roman paganism.”

      Actually, it comes from the concept of “Atonement” which goes back millennia. The Bible’s central message is atonement. From the first stories in Genesis to the last visions of Revelation it is everywhere apparent that God seeks to reconcile his people to himself and that he has provided a way to do so.

      Certainly the most frequently mentioned means of atonement in the Old Testament were the blood sacrifices, dominating the use of the term by constant reference in the books of Leviticus and Numbers. Atonement needed to be made for everything from heinous crimes like idolatry (Num 16:47) to mistakes of intent, when the only sin was ignorance or error, not willful disobedience (Num 15:22-29).

      The New Testament presents the person and work of Christ as God’s ultimate provision for atonement. The English word atonement is used to describe the New Testament concept of Christ presented as our reconciliation (2 Cor. 5:18), as a propitiation (1 John 4:10), in giving his life as “a ransom for many” (Matt. 20:28), having poured out his blood “for the forgiveness of sins” (Matt. 26:28).

      “God is just and cannot be expected to punish someone for the sin committed by another without any conspiracy to do it. Hence, the concept of god offering himself as ransom for the fallen mankind has to fall like cardhouse.”

      Well I agree with you there. I always had a problem with the concept myself. Personally, I believe in a god of pure and unconditional love. His love reveals us. I also find great inspiration in Christ’s teachings. They resonate with our innate sense of truth. Who can deny that we are here for one thing only, to love one another, and to know God’s love and mercy? Everything else is excess, including theological debates.

      • billybob says

        Dec 10, 2016 at 9:46 am

        Disclosure: Several paragraphs above were shamelessly lifted whole cloth and plagiarized from this site: http://www.theopedia.com/atonement

  14. Cretius says

    Dec 12, 2016 at 9:48 am

    “In short, anytime non-Muslims dare to overstep their Sharia-designated “inferior” status, supremacist Muslims become violently aggrieved.

    People of the West are raised on the unique idea of treating others as they would be treated.
    This is not the sort of grievance that animates many Muslims – and certainly not those who resort to terrorism.

    Rather, they are animated by a supremacist-based grievance: they get angry seeing infidels on an equal footing with Muslims. And they get murderous seeing infidels actually lording over Muslims.
    Islamic doctrine, which persuades Muslims into believing they are superior to non-Muslims — who are even likened to dogs and cattle — imbues Muslims with this sense of entitlement.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.