Your preference is noted, sir. Now what do you propose to do to convince Islamic jihad terrorists not to mention Islam “in vain alongside terrorism”? Will you travel to the Islamic State (maybe Pope Francis could go with you) and convince the caliph that he is misunderstanding the religion of peace? Will you confront and refute the terrorists’ understanding of Islam and challenge mosques in Russia not just to condemn that understanding, but to teach actively against it? Or will you, like Obama, just pretend that all this has already been done?
“Putin: No Link Between Islam, Terror,” by Greg Price, International Business Times, December 23, 2016:
At his annual year-end press conference Friday, the Russian president said he preferred the religion not be tied to terrorism.
Throughout his campaign, President-elect Donald Trump often directly associated terrorism with Muslims around the world by saying “radical Islamic terrorism,” a phrase he criticized President Barack Obama for failing to use and denying any link between the religion and terrorist attacks.
However, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s thinking appears to fall well in line with Obama’s and not Trump, who he’s been accused of helping win the 2016 presidential election by directing his government to hack the Republican and Democratic National Committees.
Speaking at his annual year-end press conference Friday, Putin said he would prefer not to link Islam with terrorism, Russian state-run site Sputnik International reported.
“I would prefer Islam not to be mentioned in vain alongside terrorism. You are right here,” Putin said when asked if the phrase “Daesh, terrorist organization in Russia” should be banned from use by the media.
Following the assassination of a Russian ambassador in Turkey, allegedly in the name of Syria, the comments may be confusing to some.
But Putin’s comments only strengthen is previous statements on Islam and terror. In May, at an event devoted to discussing Islam and Russia, Putin said Russia will always be a “reliable ally” to the “Islamic World,” Newsweek reported.
“I would like to confirm that in Russia, the Islamic world will always find a reliable ally, prepared to cooperate in resolving pressing problems,” Putin said. “We support the position of Muslim countries to strengthen values such as justice and the rule of law in international relations.”…

Christianblood says
Putin, (the master politician) knows exactly what he is doing in making that geopolitical strategic statement!
Angemon says
Quick to jump to damage control, I see…
Climber says
A reference is vain only if the terrorist act is perpetrated by a non-Muslim.
Adrian says
One more reason never to trust the warlord tyrant Putin, nor to trust his acolytes, like Christianblood
Christianblood says
Adrian
The real, bloodthirsty warlord is here:
Angemon says
Whom, exactly, are you talking about, CB? The Jihad-enabling Gadaffi? Dead. The sore loser Hillary? Politically dead. None of them are relevant. Terrible sand-tossing.
gravenimage says
Christianblood, how is whitewashing Islam and appeasing Muslims a “geopolitical strategic statement”?
If some idiot in the West said such a thing, you would–quite rightly–hardly consider them a “master politician”, but instead just another dhimmi tool.
Pavel says
I also think this is strategically good. There are several autonomous islamic republics located within russian federation. Many of them, like Chechnya and Dagestan are hotbeds for the worst muslim dogs you can imagine.
Putin has great support of Russians (it’s not just propaganda) and is able to turn the people to be against islam quite easily. And I believe Putin acknowledges islamic threat, but now is not the time to pronounce this and have his own people starting a civil war. He knows better. Just within the last few years you can really say that Caucus region is under control and now are many initiatives trying to make caucus muslims and bashkir/tatar less of a violent threat while maintaining control over that territory.
I think Putin will change his statement – no problem, afterall Russia is Christian Orthodox country – but it’s not wise to speak the truth until Russia has some strong allies like USA.
Angemon says
Hard to make the US into an ally if you keep spreading virulently anti-American propaganda. Here’s Russia Today’s take on what Trump’s election means for women in the US:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3liu_Cx7Rd0
And recently, in the wake of the crazy Democrat claims that Russia hacked the DNC and Podesta emails to benefit Trump, Putin stated that only they (the Russians) believed that Trump would win. That’s exactly how someone wanting to throw fuel on the fire of the Democrat sore losing would say.
gravenimage says
Pavel wrote:
I also think this is strategically good. There are several autonomous islamic republics located within russian federation. Many of them, like Chechnya and Dagestan are hotbeds for the worst muslim dogs you can imagine.
…………………………..
This is true–and this is why it is unwise to throw these dogs a bone by acting the dhimmi by pretending that they are anything but rabid.
More:
Putin has great support of Russians (it’s not just propaganda) and is able to turn the people to be against islam quite easily. And I believe Putin acknowledges islamic threat, but now is not the time to pronounce this and have his own people starting a civil war. He knows better. Just within the last few years you can really say that Caucus region is under control and now are many initiatives trying to make caucus muslims and bashkir/tatar less of a violent threat while maintaining control over that territory.
…………………………..
What–by allowing Kadyrov to impose Shari’ah law in Chechnya? You may believe that appeasing Muslims by allowing them to throw out Russian law and institute Islamic law makes them less of a violent threat, but I do not. Appeasing Muslims just emboldens them.
Playing footsie with the horrifying Islamic Republic of Iran and enabling their nuclear program does not help, either.
More:
I think Putin will change his statement – no problem, afterall Russia is Christian Orthodox country – but it’s not wise to speak the truth until Russia has some strong allies like USA.
…………………………
Well, Putin certainly *hasn’t* been speaking the truth, given his frequent whitewash of Islam.
If you believe–as you or anyone should–that this dhimmitude is unwise in the West, why would you suddenly consider it a stroke of genius when performed by Putin–unless you believe that it is not allowed to criticize that undemocratic strongman no matter what he does?
Christianblood says
gravenimage
Dear Graven, Putin fully knows what he is doing. This was political statement.
Angemon says
GI politely asked you to explain what you meant. Repeating what you said is NOT explaining what you ment, is it?
gravenimage says
Well, yes, Christianblood–there is no doubt that this was a political statement by Putin–unfortunately, dhimmitude *is* political.
I asked how this was, as you asserted, a “geopolitical strategic statement”. What is strategic about this–except in the sense that dhimmitude is strategy?
Please note–as critical as I have been of Putin, I am not pleased to see that sort of appeasement of Muslims from any source–especially such an influential one as Putin.
I am even sadder to see that Russian apologists here, far from being concerned, just feel compelled to defend every word that falls from Putin’s mouth, no matter how much it puts us all–including the Russian people–in further danger from appeasing Islam.
Angemon says
gravenimage posted:
“Christianblood, how is whitewashing Islam and appeasing Muslims a “geopolitical strategic statement”?”
It wasn’t. It was just CB making a(n even bigger) parody of himself and confirming what I’ve been saying so far about him. If it had been a Western politician/public figure saying those exact same words, we’re be treated to another of his rants about how the whole West hates Christians and loves muslims. Since it was Putin saying so, he needed to stand and applaud it.
Pavel says
Angemon, you are right about this, RT is putting fuel on fire with anti-American propaganda. Maybe playing on both sides for the reason of self preservation later.
However, this is changing. If you look at Rossiya24, ria, etc, slowly one can read warming Russian attitudes to USA. Until a few months ago Russia and Russians were ready for war with America because of the threats and sanctions from Obama and friends. Now it’s changing. Have a nice Christmas.
Angemon says
Merry (belated) Christmas and a Happy New year to you too, Pavel 🙂
gravenimage says
True, Angemon. I would love to see the West, Eastern Europe, and Russia standing against the threat of Islam.
But apart from a handful of leaders like Trump and Hungary’s Orbán, this seems like a vain wish at this point.
Tradiguy says
I have respect for Putin but isn’t Islam and terrorism rather like two scumbags pissing in a bucket- can you separate it?
umbra says
He knows the ROP is a problem. Unfortunately, all CIS central asian states are ROP along with problematic caucus republics. So, what he says and what he does are different at times, for geopolitical, security and economic reasons.
gravenimage says
Some of the things that Putin has done are equally disturbing, such as aiding a nuclear Iran and presiding over the opening of Mosques in Russia.
The idea that his appeasement is just talk is, I’m afraid, mistaken.
cs says
There we go, the great defender of Christianity.
David says
Muslims are snowflakes.
BornOnce says
And the Obamas are cornflakes:
I just saw a few minutes of their Xmas message…”Dad jokes”…for crying out loud.
No wonder Jesus wept.
If you looked closely you could see Obama’s eyes twitching horizontally as he read the teleprompter.
And Mama Obama…Oh to be kissed by those pale greased lips…Oh Barack Hussein how I envy the rapture of your days…
BARBARA BROOKS says
Putin doesn’t believe what he said. He is trying to build strong alliances with Turkey, Syria and Iran, as well as not alienate the Muslim citizens in Russia.
gravenimage says
Barbara, how can any Infidel country “build strong alliances” with Muslims who consider them “filthy Kuffar”?
Angemon says
This shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone who following the news and looks at his track record so far.
Again: this shouldn’t be a surprise.
And since Russian major news outlets are controlled by the state, he can get what he wants there.
No, not really – but I guess the people whose ideological lenses and filters leave out anything that goes against Putin being a Messiah might have been caught flat-footed…
Again, what’s the surprise here? This is an echo of what he stated back in 2005, when he described Russia as being the protector of the islamic world.
gravenimage says
All sadly true.
Stan Lee says
The Iranian regime and Assad’s Syrian government are on Putin’s mind, plus the Iran-partial U.S. President Obama will be gone from the U.S. presidency on Jan.20,2017. So may Obama’s defective treaty with Iran. Trump has indicated that he must review the Obama-Kerry arrangement.
That leaves Putin as the big non-Muslim player in that neighborhood.
But, Putin must maintain relations with that part of Islam that is Iran and Assad’s Syria. He also has up to 15% of the Russian population, which are Muslims, considering the Volga Tartar Muslims to those of the northern Caucasus provinces. Those in the northern Caucasus (Chechnya, Dagestan, for example) have had jihadi problems, but Putin has that under control. Wahhabi Muslims are discouraged from visiting Russia, especially Caucasus provinces where there have been rebel problems in the past.
In Russia’s interior, Volga Tartars have been in that region even before The Kremlin annexed the then Muslim khanate of Kazan, into Russian governance over 300 years ago. Those Muslims of the Volga region are fully assimilated and their area is of mixed population, Muslim and Christian.
Putin wants to be careful, because there can be no doubt that certain elements outside of Russia’s territory, such as Saudi Wahhabists, constantly try influencing loyal to Russia Tartars.
The Crimea which left Ukrainian sovereignty, remains partial to The Kremlin and most of its population are Crimean Tartars. Needless to state, Putin has a strong police, military,and intelligence presence throughout Russia.
maghan says
Ethnic Russians are some 60% of Crimea. Tartars are only 12%. The rest are mostly Ukrainians.
Putin: Talk nicely but with your heavy guns on display.
no_one says
Russia has millions of Muslims. Putin has to be the president of all Russians. I am sure he is a Christian. I have seen pictures of him in a Church. He is also very nice to the Russian Orthodox Church. Or that is my impression.
gravenimage says
No one said that Putin in Muslim. He certainly is appeasing them, though. Appeasing Muslims and whitewashing Islam does nothing to protect Infidel Russians–or any other non-Muslims.
maghan says
But Islam in genuine practice as in the case of ISIS is being degraded daily by Russian air-power. Implicit in Putin’s answer is: If you are Muslim then just stick to banging your dopey head on the ground 5 times a day and starving your stupid self Ramadan time”.
gravenimage says
Islam in genuine practice has also been on display in Chechnya, in Iran, and in Russia with Jihad terror attacks and the beheading of a little four-year-old child, I’m afraid.
TassieR says
He is not a Christian. He is just a Chekist – a professional member of the State Security, that is. Any useful disguises are as good for their activities now as they were in Stalin’s times.
mortimer says
K.8.60 ‘TURHIBUNNA’ (terrorize them)
vlparker says
The Islamic world doesn’t want you as an ally, Putin. They want you as a muslim or they want you dead.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
putin understands it unlike mad trump who wants the united state to suicide mission that will fail.trump think that confronting islam as a whole will benefit him.it will harm him,even though he could not realise it because he is a madman
gravenimage says
The appalling ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
putin (sic) understands it unlike mad trump (sic) who wants the united (sic) state (sic) to suicide mission that will fail.trump (sic) think that confronting islam as a whole will benefit him.it (sic) will harm him,even (sic) though he could not realise it because he is a madman
……………………
muhammed himself has admitted that Jihad terror is an intrinsic part of Islam–yet he is demanding that Infidels pretend that this is not so. He is also threatening any Infidels who do not act the dhimmi with destruction.
maghan says
Strange and very amusing. Every time you struggle to punch words on a computer keyboard your IQ descends 5 points. It’s now at room temperature. Keep it up it will soon be at freezing point. Some benefit here: it could help roll back what some people call “global warming”.
BornOnce says
She/he/it (sh*t) may not understand. Islamists are usually at boiling point (100 Celsius) at any time of the day or year so for them 100 is a comfortable room temperature -and the average !Q..
somehistory says
Russia voted with the others at the U.N. against Israel. That is enough.
Ernie says
Well said Somehistory .Thank you .
gravenimage says
Thanks for reminding us of that shameful vote, Somehistory.
davej says
When someone like Putin also has to bow down to Islam (probably due to the existing Muslim populations in his territories) it demonstrates the weak hand we non-Muslims hold around the world. Defeating Islamic Supremacy will require a coalition that seems less and less likely. Trump cannot do it alone.
gravenimage says
I don’t believe Infidels actually have a weak hand, dave–just because so many dhimmis play it that way.
Mark A says
If Putin is allying Russia with Islam, we cannot consider Russia to be a western ally.
Perhaps Putin is saying this because there are Islamic countries along most of Russia’s southern border and a sizable Muslim population within Russia itself.
But if Putin is seriously allying Russia with the Islamic countries, Russia cannot be considered a friend of western countries.
maghan says
But all the cowardly and appeasing West except PE Trump would agree with Putin.
gravenimage says
Putin: “I would prefer Islam not to be mentioned in vain alongside terrorism”
…………………..
So much for the silly idea–held by so many, unfortunately–that Putin and Russia are clear-eyed (and hard assed) when it comes to the threat of Islam.
maghan says
There’s a double entendre here. Putin is intimating that It would be much better for Muslims to stick to head-banging 5 times a day and their ritualistic primitive Haj than otherwise.
gravenimage says
Not really–dhimmis regularly trot out the line that Islam is not violent. This is not intended as a veiled demand that Muslims reject violent Jihad.
linnte says
This is a hit in the gut. Dang.
traci94 says
I just can’t even find the words anymore to express my dismay and frustration with this kind of crap. By this crap, I mean people saying that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. It so obviously does, and I’m so offended by leaders treating the rest of us as though we’re stupid and can’t see what is plainly right in front of us. Are world leaders being paid by Islamic countries or what? I mean, WTH????
f c king says
This sounds so Un-Putin-like. As long as he keeps bombing them, who cares what he says ?
Angemon says
“Them”? Certainly not the muslims in Chechnia, who are in an open insurgency since the 90’s. Or ISIS – remember that Putin’s first targets in Syria were everyone but ISIS, which enabled ISIS to gain ground by occupying territory previously held by other rebel groups.
UNCLE VLADDI says
So: Russia’s Vlad Putin just Submitted to Islam, revealing he’s Turkey and Iran’s little BITCH after all!
ibrahim itace muhammed says
gravenimage,no muslim will tell you that there is no jihad fighting in islam no matter how apologetic he appears.it is a religious duty to protect muslim community.we are only saying what isis and other terrorist groups are doing is not a jihad acceptable to allah and rewardable.yet you insist that they do jihad in accordance with provisions of the quran and hadiths you have been citing and interpreting in your own way.telling me which part of the quran or hadith authorises mass killing of unarmed civilians,including women and children, without trial and conviction by a sharia court for a crime each individual or group have committed? it is only found in your evil bible in samuel 15:3 .isis and other terrorist groups do carryout indiscriminate killings by way of suicide bombings of churches, mosques,markets or shoping centres,residential houses and any other place of public gathering.you are telling us that because these people say”allah akbar”while carrying out such atrocities, they are fighting for allah.but the holy prophet muhammad,who was the best interpreter and model of islam,told us that he who fights in that way will not be rewarded by allah and if he is killed he will go to hell, not a matyr. you can judge who is right between our stand on jihad and your stand that the activities of terrorist groups are in strict compliance with quran and hadiths.however, i have to tell you that if mad dog trump confront all muslims,we will all resort to jihad to defeat him as allah promised us.let him go ahead.we are wait for the evil baboon the son of the devil.
Angemon says
Hi there, Ebionite. You wrote:
“gravenimage,no muslim will tell you that there is no jihad fighting in islam no matter how apologetic he appears.”
Wrong. Usually, apologia goes like this: “islam is a religion of peace”. When non-muslims point to verses, ahadith and exegesis justifying violence in the name of islam, apologists try to spin it as being “defensive” war. It’s when non-muslims point to unprovoked islamic wars of conquest that islamic apologists stomp out in a flurry of insults.
“it is a religious duty to protect muslim community.”
Like I said, islamic apologists spinning violence as being “defensive”.
“we are only saying what isis and other terrorist groups are doing is not a jihad acceptable to allah and rewardable.”
They seem to think it is, seeing how they justify their actions with islamic texts and teachings, as well as a mountain of commentary from islamic scholars.
“yet you insist that they do jihad in accordance with provisions of the quran and hadiths you have been citing and interpreting in your own way.”
GI’s own way? Far from it. Try “ISIS and classic islamic scholars’ own way”.
“telling me which part of the quran or hadith authorises mass killing of unarmed civilians,including women and children, without trial and conviction by a sharia court for a crime each individual or group have committed?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ur7Ttz0q0o4
“it is only found in your evil bible in samuel 15:3”
Really? Please, explain. Explain how Samuel 15:3 justifies what ISIS is doing. Bet you won’t, so I might as well explain how you’re *lying*.
Samuel 15:3:
Are ISIS going after Amalekites? Are ISIS justifying their actions with the Bible? Nope, they’re going after non-muslims and justifying their actions with islamic texts. BTW, here’s Samuel 15:2
Well, well, turns out 15:3 was a saying from the LORD Almighty for a specific set of people during a specific set of time. While I don’t believe in the existence of a God, and I find the “God told me to such and such” excuse as sketchy during the erradication of the Amakelites as it is today when muslims claim it to justify murdering innocent civilians, I can nonetheless see that it’s not the open-ended commandment you try to portray it as. It differs, in that regard, from islamic orthodoxy, where verses like 9:29 (“fight the unbelievers iuntil they convert or pay the jizyiah”) are meant to be valid for all time.
“isis and other terrorist groups do carryout indiscriminate killings by way of suicide bombings”
“Suicide bombings”? I believe they call them “martyrdom”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XZZ3SypO1U
“of churches, mosques,markets or shoping centres,residential houses and any other place of public gathering.”
And they justify all of them with islamic texts.
“you are telling us that because these people say”allah akbar”while carrying out such atrocities, they are fighting for allah.”
Really? Is that what GI is saying? Where did she say such a thing?
“but the holy prophet muhammad,who was the best interpreter and model of islam”
The pedophile, highway robber and serial murderer and rapist. Nice “model” you have there…
“told us that he who fights in that way will not be rewarded by allah and if he is killed he will go to hell, not a matyr.”
Citation needed.
“you can judge who is right between our stand on jihad and your stand that the activities of terrorist groups are in strict compliance with quran and hadiths.”
Again: it’s not GI’s stand, it’s the stand of the terrorist groups and islamic commentators.
“however, i have to tell you that if mad dog trump confront all muslims,we will all resort to jihad to defeat him as allah promised us.”
Where did allah promised you that? Please pint to the quranic verse and/or ahadith mentioning Trump. Of course, your shtick of “if you try to resist to jihad we’ll kill you” is neither new or original.
gravenimage says
Fine post, Angemon.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
gravenimage,no muslim will tell you that there is no jihad fighting in islam no matter how apologetic he appears.it is a religious duty to protect muslim community.we are only saying what isis and other terrorist groups are doing is not a jihad acceptable to allah and rewardable.yet you insist that they do jihad in accordance with provisions of the quran and hadiths you have been citing and interpreting in your own way.telling me which part of the quran or hadith authorises mass killing of unarmed civilians,including women and children, without trial and conviction by a sharia court for a crime each individual or group have committed? it is only found in your mithraist evil bible in samuel 15:3 .isis and other terrorist groups do carryout indiscriminate killings by way of suicide bombings of churches, mosques,markets or shoping centres,residential houses and any other place of public gathering.you are telling us that because these people say”allah akbar”while carrying out such atrocities, they are fighting for allah.but the holy prophet muhammad,who is the best interpreter and model of islam,told us that he who fights in that way will not be rewarded by allah, and if he is killed he will go to hell, not a matyr. you can judge who is right between our stand on jihad and your stand that the activities of terrorist groups are in strict compliance with quran and hadiths.however, i have to tell you that if mad dog trump confront all muslims,we will all resort to jihad to defeat him as allah promised us.let him go ahead.we are waiting for the evil baboon the son of the devil. thus,baboon gravenimage,if repeling acts of genocide intrinsic in your evil mithraist bible makes islam a terrorist religion, take it that way.if your devil trump attempt to invade our nations to steal our resources, we will smoke him out, geting runing ,track him down and take him to mental assylum.we know why you thieves in the west consider all muslims as terrorists and islam as terrorist religion.muslims will never allow you thieves to colonise us,stealing our resources without fierce resistance.we only submit voluntarily to allah the creator, not mortal.when united states invaded iraq,removed its leadership and installed puphets, has it succeeded in getting full access to iraqi abundant oil reserves?how much it lost and how much is gained,when you conduct cost-benefit analysis.the enocomists will tell it is “huge negative return”.
gravenimage says
Apologist for Muslim savagery ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
gravenimage,no (sic) muslim (sic) will tell you that there is no jihad fighting in islam (sic) no matter how apologetic he appears.
………………………………..
Actually, as Angemon notes, this is not true. Many Muslims pretend–to Infidels, at least–that Islam is a “religion of peace” that completely rejects violence.
More:
it is a religious duty to protect muslim (sic) community.
………………………………..
Never mind that this “protection” so often means mass slaughtering inoffensive Infidels…
More:
we (sic) are only saying what isis (sic) and other terrorist groups are doing is not a jihad acceptable to allah (sic) and rewardable.
………………………………..
Who is this “we”? Certainly not mainstream Muslims:
“Al Azhar refuses to denounce the Islamic State as “un-Islamic’”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/12/al-azhar-refuses-to-denounce-the-islamic-state-as-un-islamic
Al Azhar is the center of orthodox Sunni Islam.
More:
yet (sic) you insist that they do jihad in accordance with provisions of the quran (sic) and hadiths (sic) you have been citing and interpreting in your own way.telling (sic) me which part of the quran (sic) or hadith (sic) authorises mass killing of unarmed civilians,including (sic) women and children, without trial and conviction by a sharia court for a crime each individual or group have committed?
………………………………..
I am not making the case for this–Muslims themselves are.
As for the Hadith, how about this appalling example from Sahih Muslim:
It has been narrated on the authority of Anas that the Messenger of Allah raided Khaybar. One morning we offered prayers in the darkness of early dawn. Then the Messenger of Allah mounted his horse. Abu Talha mounted his and I mounted behind Abu Talha on the same horse. When he entered the town, he said: “Allahu Akbar!. Khaybar is destroyed! When we descend in the city-square of a people, it is a bad day for them who have been warned!”. He said these words thrice. The people of the town had just come out from their houses to go about their jobs. They said in surprise: Muhammad has come. We captured Khaybar by force.
–Sahih Muslim 4437
Clearly, this was not defensive warfare.
More:
it is only found in your mithraist (sic) evil bible (sic) in samuel (sic) 15:3 .
………………………………..
ISIS is not enslaving and slaughtering their victims on the basis of Samuel 15:3, but rather on the basis of the Qur’an, Hadith, and model of the “Prophet” Muhammed.
And Jews and Christians are not doing this at all. So muhammed’s argument–such as it is–does not hold water at all.
If muhammed *really* had a problem with his fellow Muslims enslaving and butchering Infidels, he would take it up with them, instead of bothering the good people here at Jihad Watch.
More:
isis (sic) and other terrorist groups do carryout indiscriminate killings by way of suicide bombings of churches, mosques,markets (sic) or shoping centres,residential (sic) houses and any other place of public gathering.
………………………………..
This is perfectly Islamic if the targets are Infidels or those considered “Insufficiently Islamic”, as muhammed well knows.
As for “suicide”, muhammed knows that as long as Jihadists are intending to slaughter Kuffar that this is not Haram–far from it. In fact–as Angemon notes–there is nothing more exalted in Islam than “killing and being killed in the Way of Allah.
The “Prophet” himself said, when asked “what kind of Jihad is the highest?” he replied: “The person who is killed whilst spilling the last of his blood”.
More:
you (sic) are telling us that because these people say”allah akbar”while (sic) carrying out such atrocities, they are fighting for allah.but (sic) the holy prophet muhammad,who (sic) is the best interpreter and model of islam,told (sic) us that he who fights in that way will not be rewarded by allah (sic), and if he is killed he will go to hell, not a matyr (sic).
………………………………..
Pious Muslims saying “Allahu Akbar!” while slaughtering Infidels is the least of it–this kind of Jihad is sacralized in the Qur’an, the Hadith, and the actions of the “Prophet” himself.
I would ask muhammed to cite a single quote of the “Prophet” that condemns pious Muslims waging Jihad to hell.
More:
you (sic) can judge who is right between our stand on jihad and your stand that the activities of terrorist groups are in strict compliance with quran (sic) and hadiths (sic).
………………………………..
This is what Muslim apologists always tell Anti-Jihadists–but that fact is that these are not *my* interpretations–they are those of muhammed’s own pious coreligionists. He should take it up with them if he doesn’t like it.
But he won’t–it is not that he objects to violent Jihad–he just objects to our knowing that this is mainstream Islam, since that puts us on our guard.
More:
however, (sic) i (sic) have to tell you that if mad dog trump (sic) confront all muslims,we (sic) will all resort to jihad to defeat him as allah (sic) promised us.let (sic) him go ahead.we (sic) are waiting for the evil baboon the son of the devil.
………………………………..
The only “confrontation” Trump has said he will have with Muslims is acting to keep out violent Jihadists. Apparently muhammed thinks that keeping Jihadists from slaughtering us is ample grounds for–well–slaughtering us.
*Very telling*.
More:
thus,baboon(sic) gravenimage,if (sic) repeling (sic) acts of genocide intrinsic in your evil mithraist (sic) bible(sic) makes islam (sic) a terrorist religion, take it that way.if (sic) your devil trump (sic) attempt to invade our nations to steal our resources, we will smoke him out, geting (sic) runing (sic),track (sic) him down and take him to mental assylum.we (sic) know why you thieves in the west consider all muslims (sic) as terrorists and islam (sic) as terrorist religion.muslims (sic) will never allow you thieves to colonise us,stealing (sic) our resources without fierce resistance.we (sic) only submit voluntarily to allah (sic) the creator, not mortal.when (sic) united (sic) states (sic) invaded iraq,removed (sic) its leadership and installed puphets, (sic) has it succeeded in getting full access to iraqi (sic) abundant oil reserves?how (sic) much it lost and how much is gained,when (sic) you conduct cost-benefit analysis.the (sic) enocomists (sic) will tell it is “huge negative return”.
………………………………..
Of course, the West is not stealing Muslim resources. If we had planned to do that in Iraq, we would have had no problem doing so–but we never did.
Just another fake “grievance” for Muslims to mass-murder us.
Islam the religion of killers says
“I would like to confirm that in Russia, the Islamic world will always find a reliable ally, prepared to cooperate in resolving pressing problems,” Putin said
FANTASTIC …… finally somewhere to export Jihadi murderers too.
The western world has a huge inventory of thieves and rapists to put on a train .
I’m sure Putin will be welcoming to as many refugees as we can send him ,,, ??
bleeps says
Wow, I already see my little dream prophecy fullfilling!
Russia and Iran allied prophecy by jews who will attack Romania( how? )
Let’s say that my dream of seeing a MiG carying a nuclear or atomic bomb and plunging on Bucharest is getting nearer, as we know allied american army might have in its local contingents some muslim deflector(s) from Deveselu base as my dream pointed to south-west of capital the airoplane coming. And thus a probability of global nuclear war might come considering the setup of a muslim minister in Romania by corrupt party of social demon-rats. Baba Vanga profecies seem to come to reality.