• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Saudi woman goes outside without hijab, receives multiple death threats

Dec 1, 2016 4:42 pm By Robert Spencer

A woman going outside without a hijab? Haram, deeply offensive to Allah. Killing a woman who goes outside without a hijab? Pleasing to Allah.

A hadith quotes Muhammad saying: “When a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it does not suit her that she displays her parts of body except this and this,’ and he pointed to her face and hands.” (Sunan Abu Dawud 4092)

saudi-woman

“Saudi woman pictured not wearing hijab faces calls for her execution,” by Tom Embury-Dennis, Independent, December 1, 2016:

A woman in Saudi Arabia pictured without a hijab is facing calls for her execution.

Some social media users reacted with outrage after the emergence of the image taken in capital city Riyadh, with one man calling for the state to “kill her and throw her corpse to the dogs”.

The photo was allegedly first posted by an account under the name of Malak Al Shehri, which has since been deleted, reports the International Business Times.

An unnamed student who reposted the image told the website that Ms Al Shehri had announced she was going out to breakfast without either a hijab or abaya; a traditional Saudi body covering.

The student said she started receiving death threats after posting proof in response to followers who had asked to see a photo.

“So many people retweeted it and what she did reached extremists, so she got threats,” the student said. “She deleted her tweets but they didn’t stop, so she deleted her account.”

A hashtag which translates into English as “we demand the imprisonment of the rebel Angel Al Shehri” subsequently went viral.

One user wrote “we propose blood”, while another demanded a “harsh punishment for the heinous situation”….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Saudi Arabia, Sharia, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Malak Al Shehri


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Jaladhi says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 4:48 pm

    Ah these Muslims and their Mo/allah feel so threatened by the sight of woman’s hair and other body parts!! These cowards will attack the brave girl who has ventured to be free from Islamic slavery of customs.

    • skep says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 4:57 pm

      Nothing is more stupid covering your hair for a woman. Women should revolt because in the koran
      it calls for a woman to be modest in her dress. It does not call for the hair to be covered.

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 1, 2016 at 6:20 pm

        This is true–still, the idea that we should have to follow what is in the Qur’an is pretty questionable. In that case, beating women and slaughtering Infidels is just fine.

      • Guest says

        Dec 1, 2016 at 7:22 pm

        I don’t accept that anyone should do anything because of the koran.

        Modest, shmodest – each culture and era has its own ideas of how women should somehow reduce male desire by dressing a certain way. The whole idea is false and I reject it. Where I grew up we regularly visited naturist beaches, and enjoying sea, sun and breeze on our bodies was neither immodest, nor did it drive men to crazed desire.

        Do you/females you know show ankles? Immodest in some places. Do they wear makeup? Immodest in others. No makeup? Immodestly assuming they look OK without it. There’s no winning.

        That’s why ‘slutwalk’, unpleasant though it was, had its point: women’s clothing is not responsible for sexual abuse.

      • Ascender says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 8:42 am

        It does. It says only their hands and eyes should be seen.

      • Marty says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 10:24 am

        True.
        Plenty of mohammedan women dress reasonably.
        Burkas etc are a political uniform & should be
        banned in the UK, just like all other religious uniforms.
        Incidentally. Islamic uniforms are like the KKK, only reversed.
        Women in black threatening robes & hidden faces as
        opposed to men in black

        • High Hopes says

          Dec 3, 2016 at 4:05 am

          My heart aches when my innocent three year old son sees a cloud of black coming towards him. In the horror that is now Finsbury Park in London, which I had the misfortune of having to visit yesterday. What must his child’s mind think, when he sees a black phantom figure coming towards him? I see it as a statement of militant Islam, and more offensive than a KKK outfit, as at least they were upfront in their nastiness. This pretence of modesty and piety, when no doubt they harbour all manner of racist hatred is so much more deviant, it is a uniform of fanaticism.

      • Bindon Blood says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 12:24 pm

        I think you will find that it does say a woman must cover her hair,except when in the purification stage of the haj. Anyway ,you are overlooking the Hadith which are just as binding as the Koran,as is quoted above.
        ,

    • nicu says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 5:51 pm

      Saudi arabia is the base of all radical and evil Islam – but nobody fights them for bloody oil 🙁

      • billybob says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 5:40 am

        Oil from Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Iraq and others should be taken from them by force and held in trust for the world. Proceeds from the sale of that oil could pay for the military campaigns that liberated it. Once the debt is paid, then profits could go to noble causes such as programs to counter the tyranny of Islam.

        • Anne Smith says

          Dec 3, 2016 at 4:52 am

          What rubbish, we just don’t want any more wretched Middle Eastern wars, such as Bush initiated which was in reality all about oil.

          Instead develop our own energy sources, progress more shale, let science expand our derivatives, there must be great improvements in solar and wave, hydroelectric etc. Science in the West has always come to our rescue and can do so again.

          Let the Middle Eastern savages wallow and drown in their own oil, while we move on.

        • Angemon says

          Dec 3, 2016 at 12:35 pm

          Anne Smith posted:

          “What rubbish, we just don’t want any more wretched Middle Eastern wars, such as Bush initiated which was in reality all about oil.”

          No, it wasn’t. The US did NOT benefit from Iraqi oil.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 3, 2016 at 1:19 pm

          The idea that Bush was after oil is a ludicrous smear. The US never benefited from Iraqi oil. Iraq cost us–and is continuing to cost us–a damn fortune. An estimated $1.7 trillion, and factoring war benefits to veterans, as much as 6 trillion over the next several decades.

        • Susette says

          Dec 4, 2016 at 9:53 am

          The intent of the Iraq war was oil. Remember Cheney’s secret energy meeting? Their line of thinking was none other than “Surely, Iraq would reward the USA with oil after setting Iraqis free” (If you call ISIS setting them “free”) What Bush and Cheney in their delusional wisdom did not anticipate was that Iraq would not give a contract to single US company. Instead, China and Russia got the biggest awards, and they were the biggest war detractors.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 4, 2016 at 3:21 pm

          The US *never* made any money off Iraqi oil. This is just false. If we had wanted to seize the Iraqi oil fields we could have–but we never did.

      • Carolyne says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 9:12 am

        And millions of dollars. $20-$30 million to the Clinton Foundation and more millions to the Clinton Campaign. They contributed 20% to Hillary Clinton’s failed campaign. They own the Clintons. It is rumored that the Bushes also receive millions, but I have yet to find confirmation of that. I will Google it to see what I can find.

        • GT says

          Dec 2, 2016 at 9:51 am

          Trump has stated that the USA will stop buying Saudi oil.. the Saudis have protested.. should I care? Naaah..

    • Stuart says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 10:02 am

      There all cowards and scum. Every country should ban them. They don’t fit in our society. Like fuck I will listen to them idiots. If countries don’t comply throw the politician government in prison. Matters like this should be for the people not the scum government doing what they want. Reminds me of someone oh yeah that useless tit head Trudeau.

      • Roy C says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 5:01 pm

        Isn’t it time that we faced this sort of nonsense straight on and the hell with this insanity of PC idiocy?! A 7th century power mad crackpot imagines he’s been selected by the ruler of the universe via Archangels dictating Allah’s rules and regulations and 1.2 billion people take any of this seriously???? Every time I see a woman wearing a burka or even a scarf to hide her beautiful hair it just screams submission to a hideous ideology. The PM of Norway (of all places!)
        has it right – you want to come to the west you adopt to our culture and beliefs – the repression of woman must end. You won’t accept this? Then stay in your backward country. No exceptions.

  2. Wellington says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 4:54 pm

    Meanwhile, silly non-Muslim females galore here in the West are only too eager to show their solidarity with their “Muslim sisters” by wearing an hijab now and again.

    Such females have blood on their hands. No damn excuses here. These useful idiots have blood on their hands.

    • Angemon says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 5:02 pm

      Right? “Saviour complex” should be classified as a mental illness.

      • Wellington says

        Dec 1, 2016 at 6:52 pm

        Not sure about the mental illness designation. Am sure about any stupidity designation.

        Besides, the unfortunate mental illness route can let people off the hook. The sheer stupidity route never does.

      • joe says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 4:18 am

        Soo sad… Actually quite pretty, without the umbre;la

    • Lioness says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 11:00 am

      “Feminists” support a woman’s right to wear a hijab, but lack the moral courage to support a woman’s right not to wear one.

  3. eduardo odraude says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 4:54 pm

    The Saudi government is doomed. One day, perhaps sooner than people think, this woman and millions of people like her will take over, and all the little and big dictators of Saudi Arabia will be in jail where they belong. That will be a day to celebrate.

    • skep says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 pm

      Lets hope that will happen soon.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 6:25 pm

      eduardo odraude wrote:

      The Saudi government is doomed. One day, perhaps sooner than people think, this woman and millions of people like her will take over, and all the little and big dictators of Saudi Arabia will be in jail where they belong. That will be a day to celebrate.
      …………………….

      eduardo, the idea that pious Muslims are poised to mass-reject Islam in the the very belly of the beast is attractive–but sadly I don’t think there is any reason to believe this is apt to happen.

      • Guest says

        Dec 1, 2016 at 7:25 pm

        Sadly, I agree. The government has a pretty well-equipped army, even if some Arabs would like to revolt. And if they succeeded – probably just another crappy islamist state.

      • eduardo odraude says

        Dec 1, 2016 at 9:50 pm

        graven, I agree. Notice my choice of words: “one day, perhaps sooner than people think” — that’s a pretty wide open way of forecasting doom. But doom is coming to them.

        • eduardo odraude says

          Dec 1, 2016 at 9:52 pm

          That said, graven, I can see how you interpreted my words as suggesting that there was about to be a mass rebellion.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 2, 2016 at 12:26 am

          Thanks for that clarification, Eduardo.

    • Bent Thystrup says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 12:03 am

      Hi from Halfdan
      Are you prepared to wate another 1400’years ” for the scenario to happened ”
      Ind the mean time ” past 1400 years 200 40 million infidel have bin kild ” budist ” kristians ” Hindu ” ateist ” no believers of the right “” Islam ” ? Ex Ex ” the list goes on ” and on .

  4. Voytek Gagalka says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 5:00 pm

    Is there any proof that this really happened on the streets of Riyadh? It could just easily be photoshopped so it would look like Riyadh. As easily I could make my own “photo” walking within the holy city of Mecca, even that I am not a Muslim. Ah, those stupid Saudis! Are they even aware of photoshopping? Apparently not. And now they are going to make a witch hunt for that woman, or run after the first victim even remotely similar to this one and murder her and the name of “allah”?

    • joe says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 4:20 am

      you are probably right

  5. Goddess says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 5:28 pm

    Bomb the shit out of ’em.

  6. John Hawk says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 5:29 pm

    Why do women terrify the psychotic Allah and his “messenger,” the corrupt and morally bankrupt Muhammad? Did Muhammad have mommy issues? Or maybe it’s Allah that’s a gender-confused horror show, filled with guilt and rage.

    “Kill her and throw her corpse to the dogs,” the savages scream. Do they even hear themselves?

    Among all the mental illnesses in the world, the mass psychosis called Islam surely ranks as one of the worst.

  7. Stephanie says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 5:34 pm

    ‘Men are in CHARGE of women … STRIKE them.’ (only for ‘FEAR’ of DISobedience)
    http://quran.com/4/34
    VS. Art 2, 2; 3 GG (German Constitution)

    https://twitter.com/schnellmann_org/status/803556584609738753

    • Stephanie says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 5:36 pm

      Saudi Arabia, motherland of Islam, Dar al-Saalam, the domain of peace™

  8. marina says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 5:45 pm

    Do men really get weak at the knees by seeing women’s hair? What if the woman is covering her hair but wearing tight clothing which leaves little to the imagination. Are the men going to look the other way then. Ridiculous Mozlems !!

    • billybob says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 6:03 pm

      It’s not that. They get weak in the knees at the thought of a woman having any kind of independence, or in this case, independent thought. They are outraged at the act of disobedience and start foaming at the mouth.

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 1, 2016 at 6:31 pm

        Very true, Billybob.

      • Carolyne says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 9:15 am

        Yes, it is a matter of control.

    • Pete says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 8:19 am

      When they can shag the camels and goats, dont you thinks its prudent for muslimas to cover their hair?
      In moe/allahs infinite wisdom, womens hair give muslim men the hard ons

  9. Jerry says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 5:52 pm

    These are the heroes that change the world. Remember Rosa Parks? It starts with one person and everything changes. And to think there are men that believe killing this woman is the right thing to do. There’s no gray area that can excuse these nuts, these men that talk of murder over a hijab are demented, retarded, and not worthy of the 21st century. America needs to make a firm stand against this kind of islamic madness, or we disgrace our founding principles and encourage human rights abuses. No more excuses for islam. We need an increase in integrity and good morals among our political leaders. They need to boldly condemn the abuse of women and religious minorities for islam. Murder, rape, and oppression is not a joke.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 6:35 pm

      I very much doubt that this is going to change things in Saudi Arabia. I just hope this woman survives.

      • eduardo odraude says

        Dec 1, 2016 at 10:01 pm

        Yes, Rosa Parks was successful because she did what she did in a system that approximated to democracy and had a free press. By contrast, in Saudi Arabia, and other dictatorships, someone who engages in civil disobedience ends up getting whipped, in a dungeon, or dead. There is no freedom to organize peacefully and publicly against the government, no free press so that the populace can debate and consider the case openly.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 1, 2016 at 10:08 pm

          True.

        • Jerry says

          Dec 2, 2016 at 8:39 am

          Eduardo, I wouldn’t argue with your perspective on SA’s tyranny and that our democracy was more conducive to change. But it’s worth mentioning that blacks in America suffered consequences that were just as bad as “getting whipped, in a dungeon, or dead” a full hundred years after the civil war. We were a democracy in name only for such people. And neither were they able to “organize peacefully and publicly against the government,” they were hosed beaten, imprisoned, and murdered for having done so.

          So yeah, America has a foundation that’s far better than islam, but the practical consequences of the bigotry they suffered was just as ugly and dangerous. That aside, I’m not so naive to think one woman in SA is going to change them overnight. But if it encourages others to make a stand then things could change for the better. I don’t think comparing this woman to Rosa Parks is excessive, she’s probably risking her life. It’s a new age whether muslims like it or not, maybe it’s time they get their own Rosa Parks. I suppose my praise and optimism of her doesn’t suit some of JW’s clientele. I don’t care. I’m not afraid to praise bravery and moral courage, that’s why I admire Robert Spencer. If her situation were hopeless I’d still praise her and feel good for having done so.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 2, 2016 at 3:42 pm

          Jerry, your impression that it is Jihad Watch’s “clientele” that is threatening this poor woman is *way* off base. It is observant Muslims who are threatening her with death.

        • Jerry says

          Dec 2, 2016 at 4:26 pm

          “Jerry, your impression that it is Jihad Watch’s “clientele” that is threatening this poor woman is *way* off base. It is observant Muslims who are threatening her with death.”

          Wow, you so distorted my message Graven that I think it best I just step away. I have too much respect for your efforts in here to make an issue of it. There’s some kind of miscommunication going on. Let’s just drop it and stay supportive of JW. Deal?

        • Jerry says

          Dec 2, 2016 at 4:55 pm

          I’m afraid this is not the case at all, Jerry. Over all, Muslim countries are further Islamizing, not liberalizing. Just look at places like Turkey and Indonesia.
          More women are being forced into Hijab. You can look at pictures of places like Egypt from the fifties and sixties and the headscarf was rare–now it is virtually the norm.
          Even horrors like Muslim sex slavery are seeing a resurgence–and we all see how Jihad terrorism is spreading.
          If the Muslim world were really liberalizing, there would be no need for Jihad Watch.
          ————————-

          That’s a straw man, Graven. You totally missed the spirit of my message. Anyway it’s not important–yeah, you’re right. Sorry I felt the need to praise this woman’s bravery. I’ll make sure and consult your greatness before I offer my 2-bit opinion. Later, Bro. 😉

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 3, 2016 at 1:26 pm

          Jerry, my replying to your comments in no way blocking you from offering your opinion–just the opposite, in fact. Many Anti-Jihadists have exchanges here, and do not as a result feel that they are being somehow prevented from speaking. In fact, I see this give-and-take a key part of the Jihad Watch comments section.

          I think this woman is brave, as well, and very much wish there were more like her. Unfortunately, I see things over all moving in the other direction. How I wish this were not the case.

          Anyway, be well, and I will look for your comments in future.

      • Jerry says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 8:03 am

        Well it’s certainly not going to change things over night. But if enough women make a stand things could definitely change. It only takes one to get the ball rolling. We’re living in a new day, islamic countries are under more and more pressure to update. But all that aside she should be commended for her courage. It’s like you said, you hope she survives. The fact that more women are making a stand against islam is a good sign, they need our support.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 2, 2016 at 3:48 pm

          Jerrry wrote:

          We’re living in a new day, islamic countries are under more and more pressure to update.
          …………………………

          I’m afraid this is not the case at all, Jerry. Over all, Muslim countries are further Islamizing, not liberalizing. Just look at places like Turkey and Indonesia.

          More women are being forced into Hijab. You can look at pictures of places like Egypt from the fifties and sixties and the headscarf was rare–now it is virtually the norm.

          Even horrors like Muslim sex slavery are seeing a resurgence–and we all see how Jihad terrorism is spreading.

          If the Muslim world were really liberalizing, there would be no need for Jihad Watch.

    • Carolyne says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 9:21 am

      Jerry, I agree with you about Rosa Parks. She is, in fact, one of my heroes. What courage it took to refuse to stand at the back of the bus in that time and that place. This young woman, if this is a true story, is risking her life needlessly because there is no provision in Saudi Arabia for her to have any impact. She is very brave, however.

      • Jerry says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 9:50 am

        Oh thanks. I don’t take Graven’s and Eduardo’s view personally, I know where they’re coming from. Positive change can seem hopeless when one considers that islam’s violent ignorance is 1400 years old and still going strong. But civilizations can and do change or die. Mass communication and rapid travel is here whether islamic countries like it or not, and that’s having a huge effect on the world’s social chemistry. The more these theocratic bullies try to impose censorship the more people will want freedom. Islamic despots are desperately trying to maintain an atmosphere of ignorance where their tyrannical superstition can thrive, Turkey is a good example. I don’t foresee big human rights improvements in my lifetime with islam. But I wouldn’t rule out positive change in the long term future, but only if women like this dare to defend their dignity and rights as human beings.

        I remember listening to one of Spencer’s talks that he ended with an inspiring little metaphor about the soft grass breaking through the concrete, something that can seem so impossible. Maybe I am just a corny, wishy-washy fool, but in this woman I see a blade of grass poking through islam’s concrete of bigotry and ignorance. I don’t feel at all guilty for being a little inspired.

  10. billybob says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 6:05 pm

    I just checked the current weather in Riyadh. It does not justify a coat like she is wearing. In other words, she tempered her actions by putting on that coat. Imagine if she just wore jeans and a sleeveless blouse. They would launch a nationwide manhunt (well, woman hunt then) for her and have her head.

    • Frank Weiss says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 6:25 pm

      In the back ground, a man is in a very heavy sweater. Just saying……

  11. gravenimage says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 6:12 pm

    A woman going outside without a hijab? Haram, deeply offensive to Allah. Killing a woman who goes outside without a hijab? Pleasing to Allah.
    ……………………….

    Yes, that sums it up. God, I hate Islam.

    I hope Malak Al Shehri–or whoever this lady is–is able to stay safe.

    • billybob says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 6:20 pm

      You might be interested in this… The Southern Poverty Law Centre (yes, those idiots) have a blog up at the moment about this stupid letter that was sent to a few mosques – how terrible it was and all that. The best part is, there is a comment section below! People may want to drop by there and leave a few considered thoughts. There are several options for joining in including Disqus.
      https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/11/30/letters-threatening-muslim-genocide-received-various-us-mosques

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 3:51 pm

        Yeah, I heard about this. Likely more fake Muslim victim-mongering.

  12. Expat88 says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 7:12 pm

    I don’t ‘think the picture is photoshopped necessarily. It almost looks like Olaya Street in downtown Riyadh.

    I lived in Riyadh for almost three decades. As a female Western woman I did go out sometimes without an Abaya and always without my hair covered. I think the reason that this woman got in trouble was by posting the picture of herself and having it spread around to people who didn’t like it. So that made it dangerous for her. But I think that she would not have risked being attacked in public because there are so many foreign workers there that the average person on the street would not have known where she was from or who she was and therefore she would not have been physically attacked in person.

    However if the religious police saw a woman dressed as she was with a coat and no scarf for the hair they could tell her that she needs to cover up and would definitely have given her a hard time.

    So in other words I think she really got herself in trouble by posting online.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 7:21 pm

      Thanks for the background, Expat.

  13. Westman says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 7:45 pm

    In Democratic society, a man is King of his castle and his bride is the Queen.

    In Islamic society, the man is King of his castle and his bride is the slave.

  14. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 8:00 pm

    filthy christians value nudity too much and consider it as sign of civilisation because their miraist evil bible (the book of genocide and phornography)teachs them to behave like wild animals having indiscriminate sex like animals.it teachs that a father can dip his finger inside his daughter’s vagina to taste if it is like wine and have sex with her.you can see this savagy life glaring in christian communies.some christians parents even disvirgin their daughters at the age of 5 to prepare her for that animal style of sex life.in the unite states some christian ladies even walk fully naked saying it is a sign of freedom they are enjoying in their country. we muslims, consider nudity to be too primitive and barbaric.nudity reduces beauty outlook of a woman.when a muslim lady appears nude she loses value and look like a prostitute.islam wants woman to maintain her diginity as human being, not as mere sex object.so,that muslim lady in saudi arabia who appeared without hijab or descent dress was taking herself back to jahiliyya(darkness) life style in arabia not modernising.it is filthy christians who are accustom to beast life style considering it as sign of modernisation.

    • mikenot says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 8:35 pm

      You ‘learned’ all that from your quran?
      I am starting to believe that intelligence on the planet Earth is a constant number.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 8:36 pm

      Foul apologist for Muslim savagery ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:

      filthy (sic) christians (sic) value nudity too much and consider it as sign of civilisation
      ……………………………

      This woman is not “nude”–she is wearing a long skirt and a bulky, shapeless coat.

      She just is not immurred in a Niqab and Abaya.

      But muhammed here misses the point–this is not really about clothing at all–it is that his savage coreligionists are vowing to *murder* this poor woman. Does he agree with these barbarians? Certainly, he does not condemn it.

      More:

      because their miraist (sic) evil bible (the book of genocide and phornography)teachs (sic) them to behave like wild animals having indiscriminate sex like animals.it (sic) teachs that a father can dip his finger inside his daughter’s vagina to taste if it is like wine and have sex with her.
      ……………………………

      This is, of course, calumny–and a claim that muhammed has made before. He can point to no such verses in the Bible, because none such exist. How can he suppose that civilized Infidels here would believe such obvious falsehood?

      More:

      you (sic) can see this savagy (sic) life glaring in christian (sic) communies.some (sic) christians (sic) parents even disvirgin (sic) their daughters at the age of 5 to prepare her for that animal style of sex life.
      ……………………………

      Pedophilia is *illegal* in the civilized West, and is prosecuted if such crimes are committed.

      Would that this were true in Dar-al-Islam, where child rape is *sacralized* on the model of the appalling “Prophet”, who “married” a victim at six, and raped her at nine. Attempts to raise the marriage age in Dar-al-Islam is regularly blocked by Muslim clerics, who know there is nothing more Islamic than raping little girls:

      “Raymond Ibrahim: New Saudi Fatwa Defends Pedophilia as ‘Marriage’”

      https://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/raymond-ibrahim-new-saudi-fatwa-defends-pedophilia-as-marriage

      Does muhammed condemn pious Muslims raping little girls? I very much doubt it.

      More:

      in (sic) the unite (sic) states (sic) some christian (sic) ladies even walk fully naked saying it is a sign of freedom they are enjoying in their country.
      ……………………………

      There are a handful of nudists here in the United States, who mostly practice their nudism among other nudists–as is their right–and not among the general population.

      More:

      we (sic) muslims, consider nudity to be too primitive and barbaric.nudity (sic) reduces beauty outlook of a woman.when (sic) a muslim lady appears nude she loses value and look like a prostitute.islam (sic) wants woman to maintain her diginity (sic) as human being, not as mere sex object.
      ……………………………

      The idea that forced veiling is about a woman’s “dignity” could not be more absurd. The whole purpose of the veil is to distinguish Muslimahs from Infidels, who can be raped with impunity. The idea that this enhances women’s “dignity” is grotesque.

      Moreover, note that he does not consider threats to *murder* this woman to interfere with her dignity.

      More:

      so,that (sic) muslim (sic) lady in saudi arabia (sic) who appeared without hijab or descent (sic–but a particularly Freudian slip here) dress was taking herself back to jahiliyya(darkness) (sic) life style in arabia (sic) not modernising.it (sic) is filthy christians (sic) who are accustom to beast life style considering it as sign of modernisation.
      ……………………………

      How dare we fail to murder women who don’t dress in hefty bags? *That* is what this moral idiot considers “beast life style”.

      In the Muslim world it is the murderers of women who are considered to exemplify Muslim “culture”. *Ugh*.

    • billybob says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 5:11 am

      Aren’t Muslims born naked just like the rest of us?

    • Carolyne says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 9:26 am

      Could you please explain, Ibrahim if you can, how uncovered female hair relates in any way to female nudity? Does it throw you into a sexual frenzy if you catch a glimpse of female hair?. If so, isn’t that your fault and not the fault of the hair? Do you realize what idiots you and your co-religionists are? Were your parents first cousins?

    • vladkoval says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 11:18 am

      FUCK YOU STUPID MUSLIM ASSHOLE)))

  15. Steve's nephew says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 8:27 pm

    Wait a minute…if Muslim men are so tremendously offended by the sight of a woman in public not wearing a hijab, then why are the Muslim men so eager to move to the United States, Europe, and other non-Muslim countries?

    • davej says

      Dec 1, 2016 at 9:21 pm

      Because, in the case of non-Muslim women, they are more excited than offended. They are eager to move to the West for this “excitement”, the material benefits and the grand jihad of turning it into an Islamic State as part of their “religious duty”.

      The idea that anyone would call for murder over a head scarf just proves how crazy Islam is.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 3:54 pm

      More Infidel rape victims in Dar-al-Harb…just look at Europe.

  16. underbed cat says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 9:26 pm

    If she is in Saudi Arabia and goes without cover, and then gets death threats. she should stop and hide, or maybe fly out where she will be safe….this is really dangerous for her if the imam political climate allows these threats. She is very pretty and I hope she will be safe. She made her statement but she needs to live. I can’t imagine having to deal with this unless she is of means and can hire protection.

  17. no_one says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 9:49 pm

    You are full of hatred Ibrahim.

  18. no_one says

    Dec 1, 2016 at 10:05 pm

    Ibrahim you have not read the Bible. Me neither. Only the new testament and parts of the old one. Whatever you say about Christians is not true at all. These are outright lies. You confuse Christians with atheists and satanists. No one takes our virginity at age five, and certainly not our fathers. As a mater of fact we are required to stay virgin until marriage, but few people follow this. Some do even in 21st century. Christianity is the religion of love. Our Lord told us to love God and other human beings as our selves and added that this sums up the whole low. So we are supposed to love even muslims. I have read parts of Quran. It says to kill infidels and also to lie to them whenever this advances the cause of islam. The father of lies is Satan. Also he hates human race so he tells humans to kill other humans. Jesus warned us of false prophets and this is what Muhammad was. Also we are told that even if an angel from heaven comes and tells us something different from the Gospel, that creature would be condemned. The Gospels are not distorted by people. Mere humans can’t alter God’s word. He would not allow it. Also we know that devil can pose as an Angel of light and deceive humans who are not humble. Muhammad was not humble. He probably didn’t see Archangel Gabriel, but some devil or as you say jinn. With so much hatred Quran can be nothing else, but teachings of satan, who wants to be God, but is not, never have been and never will be. We have many ways to communicate with Christ and we use them. There are many Christian denominations, but one of them never killed in the name of God. They suffered islamic rule for centuries, but finally this denomination was victorious over islam and these people have their countries now. Islam tries to come back, but will hopefully never be successful. There is a big country that belongs to this denomination and it always protects smaller nations that belong to it. That big country was never defeated, although many people tried and broke their heads. Napoleon and Hitler are two of these people and an Ottoman sultan too. The last lost a war with the big Christian country and many other Christians were liberated.

  19. no_one says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 1:45 am

    So you don’t allow Christians on your page, but letting muslim BS to be published. Not going to read your blog anymore. Try fighting muslims without Christ. No chance for success guaranteed.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 3:56 pm

      What are you saying here? There are large numbers of Christians who comment at Jihad Watch. Robert Spencer himself is a devout Christian.

      • no_one says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 4:44 pm

        He hid my comment about what Islam is according to the oldest Christian denomination and it is not the Catholic church.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 3, 2016 at 1:32 pm

          Very few posts are deleted here–unless a post is threatening, over-the-top profane, or wildly off-topic, most comments stand. As vladkoval says, below, occasionally there is a technical glitch and comments don’t post, which is frustrating. That is probably more likely than your post having been removed. There is a “Contact Us” box at the right-hand or bottom of your screen, if you want to pursue your query further.

    • vladkoval says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 5:05 pm

      It’s a glitch. It happened with me many times here.

  20. mortimer says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 2:27 am

    The walls and doors of the GREAT PRISON that is Saudi Arabia are beginning to CRICK.

    Soon the doors will explode off their hinges… soon the walls will crumble… soon the foundations of totalitarian Islam will collapse. The earth is rumbling underneath the Saudi dictators’ feet. The rumbling is women waking up.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 3:57 pm

      I wish that were apt to happen, Mortimer–but I have certainly seen no broad signs of this happening. Most Muslimahs practice Islam, as well.

  21. eur says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 3:45 am

    It is well known in the Canary Islands (Spain) the case of Moroccan women working in a beach hotel. During their working day they have the obligation (like everyone else) to wear the hotel uniform. When they take a break, they go out to the fire stairs and their husbands (who do not work) are vigilant so they do not go out without the veil .. and they put it on, at first they did not wear it. All the ridiculous lie about which hijab is not obligatory .. it dismounts. Probably many take it without being forced … but the truth is that the Muslim community requires women to cover their heads, is not optional, women who do not wear it should justify and challenge the community. It is a sect. The veil is not a garment, it is a way to mark the Muslim woman, to follow the path that the sect dictates.

  22. unbeliever1 says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 4:55 am

    Are women-in the West- who wear hijabs on “wear a hijabs day” now going to not wear hijabs in solidarity with this brave lady?

    • billybob says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 5:20 am

      You have given me a great idea! Years ago, ()back in the 60’s I believe) when gays started coming out of the closet, they promoted “gay appreciation day” during which they encouraged people to wear jeans to show their support. Later, they showed video footage of main street full of people wearing jeans to demonstrate the success of the event, though few even were aware of the ruse. Of course that was a rather clever trick, because everybody wears jeans.

      So how about a day of protest against Islamic misogyny in which women are encouraged to go without any kind of head covering to show their solidarity with oppressed Muslim women? Then after, show all the women on main street without head coverings. Perhaps choose a day when temperatures are dropping and some women are beginning to wear tooks and scarves on their heads, though the majority aren’t yet.

    • Carolyne says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 9:29 am

      Possibly. Every day for me is “Not wear a hijab day.”

  23. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 5:12 am

    eur,when last you had sex with donkey for behaving like donkey?if you are from the united states, many donkeys are now being imported for sex.you are so fanatic to sell out wild animal life of indiscriminate sex to muslim world.i said muslims consider that life too barbaric.you are saying the saudi lady who wanted her life back to days of ignorance(jahiliyya) should consider leaving saudi arabia to the lands barbarians in the west.if she is told that westerners have sex indiscriminately like donkeys she will never admire to go there. note, i am not saying the thugs who attempted her life are right.punishment for indescency under sharia is not a capital punishment.it is discretional punishment depending on the gravity of the act and how it is going to harm the society.again,it is only a courts of law that have power to impose such punishments, not individuals like thugs.even the imam has no such power.one can only report to the security agencies for prosecution before a court of law.

    • billybob says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 5:33 am

      I for one, welcome Ibrahim to JihadWatch! His spiritual journey has led him here to read the articles that will set him free of the tyranny of Islam in the end. In the short term though, we will feel his pain as cognitive dissonance sets in. Peace be upon you, Ibraham. That pain will not last. We shall welcome your return to the human family once your mind has freed itself from the shackles of a lifetime of conditioning. The longest journey begins with but a single step, and we are honoured you have have chosen to make that first step today here with us.

    • eur says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 6:49 am

      I do not understand anything you say, we’re on different waves. Sex with donkeys? What an obsession you have with the zoophilia !!!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Ll2KODL8qQ
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qFm5R2ZNeM

        I believe that by your words you are in favor of the fact that this woman’s act of rebellion should be denounced and judged by the law, and that it is the law that decides. Fascist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Look videos (if your fascist totalitarian government does not cover the connection) The Muslim civilization deserves a bald (teach the ass as a form of provocation) on the part of the rest of humanity. Fascists !!!

      Ole Ole(not control the form of clothing)
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXdWccaCHpg
      Imagine
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVg2EJvvlF8
      queen
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4Mc-NYPHaQ
      Bob Marley
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuLcTPvuH1E
      Cindy Lauper
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIb6AZdTr-A

      But there are many other ways of expressing and claiming freedom … in Islam I know not…only submision There is no music, painting, sculpture .. it is all forbidden, all human expression is haram, even human contact between man and woman. All activity you associate it with sex, sin … you are pitiful

      A civilization spoiled, millions of people unable to express their ideas, a human potential wasted … a pity. Islam is scary … and a pity for humanity.

    • Pete says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 8:32 am

      Surely ibrahim, you’ve got a mouth as filthy as your prophet muhammad

    • Carolyne says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 9:32 am

      So let me get this straight. If a man in, say, Saudi Arabia, sees a woman without hair covering, he has the authority to report it to authorities for punishment? Why is it your business what women wear? Don’t you have enough to keep you occupied without this mistreatment of women?

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 6:06 pm

      Unhinged Muslim apologist ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:

      eur,when (sic) last you had sex with donkey for behaving like donkey?if (sic) you are from the united states (sic), many donkeys are now being imported for sex.you are so fanatic to sell out wild animal life of indiscriminate sex to muslim (sic) world.
      ……………………………..

      Does muhammed even realize how ridiculous he sounds here? You seldom find donkeys in the US outside of children’s petting zoos.

      The most common internet searches for bestiality–including “donkey sex”–are from Dar-al-Islam, especially nations like Pakistan.

      The mere fact that this Mohammedan has leapt from a story of a woman going out without a Hijab to a focus on raping donkeys is *very* telling. No civilized Infidel would do this.

      More:

      i (sic) said muslims (sic) consider that life too barbaric.you (sic) are saying the saudi (sic) lady who wanted her life back to days of ignorance(jahiliyya) (sic) should consider leaving saudi arabia (sic) to the lands barbarians in the west.if (sic) she is told that westerners have sex indiscriminately like donkeys she will never admire (sic) to go there.
      ……………………………..

      Now muhammed believes he has to lie to Muslimahs in order to forestall their fleeing in huge numbers to freedom in the civilized West? Also *very* telling.

      More:

      note, (sic) i (sic) am not saying the thugs who attempted her life are right.punishment (sic) for indescency (sic) under sharia is not a capital punishment.it is discretional (sic) punishment depending on the gravity of the act and how it is going to harm the society.
      ……………………………..

      And how does a woman appearing without a slave bag “harm the society”? I suppose this barbarian “only” wants to see this woman flogged.

      More:

      again,it (sic) is only a courts (sic) of law that have power to impose such punishments, not individuals like thugs.even the imam has no such power.one can only report to the security agencies for prosecution before a court of law.
      ……………………………..

      Of course, this is not entirely the case. If individual pious Muslims believe that the state is not rigorous enough in its enforcement of Islamic savagery, they have the right to enforce Shari’ah themselves.

      I agree with billybob, though–having this barbaric Mohammedan show up here spouting his viciousness is *very* instructive for good Infidels here.

  24. FYI says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 7:19 am

    islam is like the school bully who loves to go around punching everybody in the face.
    He’s that Islamic supremacist who thinks his version of god is bigger than everybody elses version.
    I imagine the school bully thinks like this,inspired as he is by his “prophet”.
    “Hey ,let’s slay the unbeliever wherever we find them.Our “allah” says its ok.
    let’s completely ignore God’s sixth commandment and go on the rampage.
    Let’s beat up the Christian,set fire to the Jew’s beard.
    Then throw the eldely Sikh down the well.Grab the Hare Krishna by the hair and smash his tambourine
    for “allah” hates music(…and dogs…)and all infidels.String that Hindu up by his cojones and use him for target practise.
    let’s desecrate the temples of the Buddhists and the Hindus,set fire to the old church.
    For our “allah” is the biggest god of all(much taller than the Jewish Version and smarter than the Christian one surely)
    For “allah ” is the greatest version of all and anyone who disagrees will be punched in the face…
    and his prophet(despite the polygamy and mass murders) is clearly the perfect man..

  25. Florida Jim says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 9:57 am

    This is all a Islamic ploy to fool the world into thinking Islam is ready to join us in freedom and truth for all, it is not it is and will remain a religion of hatred , lying and subterfuge until the beheading begins for which most can’t wait eyeing their current neighbors with glee.Join your muslim friends at Mosque and listen to what they are being told an what the plans are for the neighborhood.

  26. Susette says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 10:08 am

    Islam is the only religion that that requires females to cover some or all of their bodies. Even most Catholic nun orders have shunned habits, but nuns choose to be nuns. They are not born into forced coverings, as are muslim women, who can’t even leave the despotic religion. So it is a false equivalence when some say other religions also require coverings. Interestingly, a Saudi Arabian muslim cleric once suggested that females cover every body part, except for one eye…because the women were wearing seductive eye makeup. He actually claimed that “one eye was more than sufficient!” I just can’t believe these barbarians are American allies. If they didn’t have oil, they would be called ISIS.

  27. Allan Mandrowski says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 3:15 pm

    Saudi Arabia. An ally of the United States.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 3:35 pm

      These barbarians are no allies of ours.

  28. vladkoval says

    Dec 2, 2016 at 5:12 pm

    But admit.. She is so beautiful!
    I announce CRUSADE!
    The West must invade Dar-Al-Islam and liberate all the beutiful women from the filthy islam!
    And let only fat ugly bitches stay in their hijabs, burqas and niqabs, so that nobody could glance at them an vomit !

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 2, 2016 at 6:12 pm

      In the civilized world, unattractive women have the right to sun and air and seeing freely, as well–just as men who may not look like Brad Pitt do.

      • vladkoval says

        Dec 2, 2016 at 7:06 pm

        I mean – they do it (hijabs) voluntarily anyway. If you disagree – you just judge superficially about Islam. There much more *earthly* reasons of everithing in Islam than “religious” ones. I even wonder, is there anything “unearthly” in Islam?

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 3, 2016 at 1:34 pm

          Certainly, there is nothing really spiritual in Islam, vladkoval.

  29. vladkoval says

    Dec 4, 2016 at 1:44 am

    Egyptian Journalist: 99% of Egyptian Whores Wear Hijab – not sign of modesty

  30. Lucy says

    Dec 8, 2016 at 6:34 am

    No Muslim country in the world will execute its women for not wearing hijab! Maybe in Iran, but definitely not in Saudi Arabia. It is indeed against the law to not wear abaya in Saudi, but that doesn’t mean your life will be the price for doing that.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.