“In 2013, when Theresa May was Home Secretary, the Home Office refused to grant a visa to…Spencer, a world renowned Islamic scholar and a US citizen, [who] is director of Jihad Watch and has led seminars on Islam and jihad for nearly every intelligence wing of the US administration. He has appeared on nearly every major international television channel. During the same period, the Home Office welcomed Muhammad al-Arifi, who advocates Jew-hatred, wife beating, and jihad, into the UK. Mr Spencer’s crime is that he is warning the Western world to beware of Islamic jihad.”
Indeed, the letter to me from the UK Home Office said that I was banned for saying: “[Islam] is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers for the purpose for establishing a societal model that is absolutely incompatible with Western society…” — which is like being banned for saying that water is wet. And now Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation. What does this say for the priorities of the British government, and for the future of Britain?
“Tolerance of Islamic intolerance is the Home Office’s cardinal doctrine,” by Jules Gomes, Virtue Online, December 10, 2016 (thanks to Inexion):
Our Prime Minister may be a Christian, but you could be forgiven for believing that our Home Office is now an Islamic fiefdom. Why else ban the Archbishop of Mosul from visiting the UK, but issue visas to Muslim preachers who advocate the stoning of homosexuals?
It is an historic moment in the historic city of Mosul (bordering Nineveh–the cradle of ancient civilisation). Over 100,000 Christians fled the Iraqi city in one night after so-called Islamic State (Isis) launched a genocidal jihad against the Christian population, who numbered two million in 2003. The entire population was issued with a 24-hour ultimatum–convert to Islam or die.
Iraqi and Kurdish fighters supported by coalition air strikes are fighting to free Mosul from the stranglehold of Isis in a knife-edged battle that reminds me of Tennyson’s Charge of the Light Brigade.
The Archbishops of Mosul and of the Nineveh valley, Nicodemus Daoud Sharaf and Timothius Mousa Shamani should be hailed as heroes. In June, Archbishop Nicodemus was in Strasbourg addressing the European Centre for Law & Justice on the genocide facing one of the world’s oldest Christian communities.
But our Home Office slammed the door in their faces and told them there was no room in the Immigration Inn, even though they were invited to attend the consecration of the UK’s first Syriac Orthodox cathedral in London to which Prime Minister Theresa May sent a letter to be read out to the congregation. The Home Office also refused entry to Archbishop Selwanos Boutros Alnemeh, the Archbishop of Homs and Hama in Syria.
Mrs May’s letter told the congregation how ‘the appalling violence that has afflicted so many areas of the Middle East reminds us how fortunate we are to live in a country where different religious beliefs are not only tolerated, but welcomed.’ Did you really mean that, Prime Minister?
If so, will St Theresa of 10 Downing Street, daughter of the Rev Hubert Brasier, regular worshipper at St Andrew’s Church, Sonning and longest-serving Home Secretary of modern times, please tell us why she aimed her steel-toed brogues (or was it her mock-croc stilettos?) at the three archbishops while opening Britain’s back door to Muslim preacher Hamza Sodagar who calls for gays to be beheaded or thrown off a cliff?
Is Mrs May asking us not only to tolerate but to welcome Imam Sodagar’s intolerant ‘different religious beliefs’ that call for gay men to be burned to death? Why does the Home Office grant Hamza Sodagar a visa to lecture at the Islamic Republic of Iran School in London while at the same time refusing to grant the archbishops of Mosul, Nineveh and Homs visas to attend a consecration at which Prince Charles is guest of honour?
Is it because the archbishops did not have enough funds to support themselves? Or is it because they might not leave the UK? The Home Office cites these as the official reasons for denying visas to the archbishops. It simply beggars belief! If the archbishops had to flee their beloved war-torn countries, they could have done so long ago. Did the Home Office ask a similar question while playing Santa Claus and shoving hundreds of thousands of pounds in housing and child welfare benefits into the stockings of Muslims who travelled to join Isis, as Lord Carlile, the former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, now reveals?
Is Home Office immigration policy one of different strokes for different folks? The answer is a resounding yes. The grotesque case of moral inversion with the Iraqi archbishops and Hamza Sodagar is the rule, rather than the exception. Western tolerance of Islamic intolerance is the Home Office’s cardinal doctrine.
In 2013, when Theresa May was Home Secretary, the Home Office refused to grant a visa to Melkite Catholic Robert Spencer. Spencer, a world renowned Islamic scholar and a US citizen, is director of Jihad Watch and has led seminars on Islam and jihad for nearly every intelligence wing of the US administration. He has appeared on nearly every major international television channel. During the same period, the Home Office welcomed Muhammad al-Arifi, who advocates Jew-hatred, wife beating, and jihad, into the UK. Mr Spencer’s crime is that he is warning the Western world to beware of Islamic jihad.
Earlier this week the Home Office refused entry to two senior members of the Church of Pakistan invited for a short trip to Glasgow. They are now reviewing the decision after criticism from the Church of Scotland. In a Kafkaesque twist, in the same period the Home Office granted a visa to Pakistani hate preacher Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri who has been banned by Pakistani authorities from preaching in Karachi! Qadri will spout his venom at Falkirk Central Mosque later this month while the Pakistani Christians still await the Home Office’s decision….

avi15 says
This happens because the lunatics are now in charge of the asylum – in other words, the Home Office and the immigration service have been infiltrated by you know who.
DP111 says
But it can only last till the Trump sounds.
The overriding cardinal principle of successive British governments is that they go where America goes. Period.
Time is getting short for multicultis. Trump is appointing far too many Patton type hard Marine corp kick ass generals. What has he got in mind?
A Harris USA says
Lunatics like Maye, need to be tossed to the curb!! Get her out,, I smell a Merckel!!!! God help the UK!! UK, you are being set up!! Get these filthy pigs out, along with the Muslim hordes!!
john spielman says
HOPEFULLY the Brits will wake up and oust these reprobate dhimmi politicians by democratic elections before there is civil war!
Bonnie Prince Charlie says
It’s not just the politicians. It’s the Civil Servants who tend to make these decisions.
Angemon says
You know, it’s almost as if there are devout muslims employed somewhere in British governmental apparatus…
Mirren10 says
British ‘government is *infested* with them. Not to mention the police, the judiciary … 🙁
Leon Degney says
There has to be. Seems we are fighting a losing battle against this scourge. Many Muslims now have places in Local and Federal Government. What hope is there from hereon?
DP111 says
War.
War has the side effect of separating the combatants, voluntarily, or by force.
Because of the stupidity of idiot politicians of the West, ignorant of Islam and history, we are now left with either submission to Islam, or war.
Cretius says
“In short, anytime non-Muslims dare to overstep their Sharia-designated “inferior” status, supremacist Muslims become violently aggrieved.
People of the West are raised on the unique idea of treating others as they would be treated.
This is not the sort of grievance that animates many Muslims – and certainly not those who resort to terrorism.
Rather, they are animated by a supremacist-based grievance: they get angry seeing infidels on an equal footing with Muslims. And they get murderous seeing infidels actually lording over Muslims.
Islamic doctrine, which persuades Muslims into believing they are superior to non-Muslims — who are even likened to dogs and cattle — imbues Muslims with this sense of entitlement.
Crusades Were Right! says
Does the British political establishment have Islamophilia, or Christophobia?
I’m guessing both!
Bob says
Crusades were right – agreed on all counts! Our UK politicos’re losing it!
Allan says
The Conservative and Unionist Party is really and truly a CUP full of truckling fools.
There is a window of opportunity for the USA to fulfill its manifest destiny of ruling all of Britannia from the Atlantic coast of North America without further obstruction by English degenerates. May the American empire be reunited with its parent. May Parliament be abolished, the House of Windsor smashed and its pieces scattered upon the winds, and the CUP’s fools pushed into the channel and the North Sea where they belong.
KrazyKafir says
I think they are afraid to offend the colossal 5th column they’ve inflicted on the UK, and prefer to be delusional about what they’ve done to England.
Vyx says
Oh, I don’t know if they’re delusional at all. It seems as if they are, however, I think they know exactly what they’re doing. The are sacrificing the British people on the altar of Multiculturalism. Britain will eventually die, and be replaced by a society based purely on Islam; IQ’s will be lower, there will be more violence, and people will beg the police state to keep them safe. At least, that’s what it looks like from the states at least.
R Russell says
Only one way out of this. It is to remember there is a supernatural aspect to life. Islam is well aware of this. Most in the UK dismiss the possibility of the supernatural and so cannot invoke the YHWH God of our fathers.
YHWH can give us the power to overcome – but only if we seek his help.
gravenimage says
There is nothing spiritual about Islam.
DP111 says
The only way that can be done is to use the police and judiciary to suppress free speech.
ECAW says
A wily politician called May
Was overheard one day to say
“I’ll whitewash sharia
if it helps my career
Your grandkids will just have to pay”,
pdxnag says
Intractably intolerant Islam is precisely why practitioners and proponents of Islam must be excluded. They, the individuals, are unacceptable in free lamds.
R Russell says
I see Theresa May is practicing wearing a hijab for when her government has capitulated to Islam and she must dress like that in public.
Holly McMolly says
People like May have gone full moron. They seem to be suffering from some kind of collective mental illness.
davej says
How can she and her government proclaim the virtues of tolerance and diversity while blatantly discriminating against Christians?
If you went to the public square and burned a bible nothing would happen to you. If you then burned a Quran you would be arrested and imprisoned. How did Islam become so special?
I suspect it is the ever present background threat of violence that has seeped into our culture, we have internalized it to the point that we feel we must behave as the dhimmis they portray us to be. We have silenced ourselves just as Muhammed Atta advised the passengers on his hijacked jet to do, for an illusion of “safety”.
Voytek Gagalka says
Unelected PM of the UK: Theresa May. She MAY be elected one day but not before calling fresh elections. Until then, she REMAINS and will remain UNELECTED!!! VERY undemocratic posturing.
gravenimage says
Tolerance of Islamic intolerance is now the British government’s cardinal doctrine
…………………….
Suicidal insanity. You have no idea how it pains me to see this happening in Britain.
don vito says
Soon many may quote hillary, to paraphrase they came, they saw, we died, hahaha.
Thomaspj Poovathinkal says
ALL EVILS in the World today ARE due to Christians who do not FOLLOW and OBEY Jesus the Lord.
Let Let us learn to be LOYAL and FAITHFUL Christians from the TRUE Apostles of the Lord in THE DIVINE Retreat Centre, Kerala, INDIA or from their branch in RAMSGATE, United Kingdom.
Christopher Wilson says
It’s interesting that Amber Rudd, the British Home Secretary, yesterday banned National Action, an anti-Semitic homophobic group. This group is almost unknown and has less than 200 members. She said:
“…it is a racist, anti-Semitic and homophobic organisation which stirs up hatred, glorifies and promotes a vile ideology, and I will not stand for it.”
Maybe now she ought to look at the imams she is letting in and examine their teachings.
HaDaR says
As Carl Popper very clearly put it:
“Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.”
We cannot fall into the politically correct trap of defining “islamofobia” the right to defend free societies from a totalitarian, intolerant, murderous, discriminating, medieval culture, which has nothing to do with religion in the Western sense, and which has kept the muslim world at the rear of ANY development of their societies. Those are people and states where they execute (in most muslim countries that’s the reality!) those who abandon Islam; they sexually mutilate their women depriving them of all possible sexual pleasure for life, treat them like cattle and discriminate them, since Islam MANDATES a male tutor for every woman. They jail, flog or stone those who denounce rape, since according to Islam they need FOUR male witnesses!