Where did Mohammed Dauhoo get the idea that this was acceptable behavior? Could it have been from the accounts of the life of the man for whom he was named, Muhammad, the prophet of Islam? Few things are more abundantly attested in Islamic law than the permissibility of child marriage. Islamic tradition records that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).
Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:
The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became all right, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah’s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).
Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.
Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.
Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:
The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.
Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”
According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.
“Dangerous sex predator jailed for 14 years for child rape,” by Julia Gregory, Enfield Gazette & Advertiser, December 1, 2016:
A ’DANGEROUS’ sexual predator from Edmonton who raped a young girl over three years is starting a 14 year sentence behind bars.
Mohammed Dauhoo, groomed his victim after after a chance meeting when she was just nine.
He invited her to his home in Upper Edmonton and raped and sexually assaulted her on numerous occasions.
The 72-year-old who is now of no fixed address bought her gifts including laptops, mobile phones and clothes as he groomed the girl.
His victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, came forward and told a teacher what had happened after Dauhoo was convicted in 2013 for similar offences.
A jury at Southwark Crown Court found him guilty of five counts of raping a child under 13 and two charges of sexual activity with a child between July 2009 and March 2013.
He was sentenced to 14 year and six months at a hearing on Wednesday….

Moses says
Islam the vile religion
Steve says
Baphomet is the idol that Satanist churches uses at their front door, and in various venues. He’s the goat god thing that represents the devil.
Baphomet was a bastardization of the name Mahamet. Mahamet was a bastardization of the name mohammad.
Coincidence? I think not.
Angemon says
An alternative theory is that “muhammad” is not a given name but an expression meaning “honored one” or “chosen one”, and that it initially referred to Jesus Christ. Christoph Luxenberg (author of “The Syro-Aramaic Reading of the Koran”) and the late Günter Lüling (a pioneer of islamic studies) argued that the quran began as a Christian devotional text originally written in Syriac, not Arabic, and that the mistranslation into Arabic made almost one third of it make no sense whatsoever. And there are certainly other evidence that add up. For example, as Mr. Spencer pointed out in his book “Did Muhammad Exist?“, the first Arab coins to mention muhammad, made in the late 7th century, displayed the figure of a man holding a cross.
carol says
Angemon…please don’t tell us this lends any real credence to Islam being “one of the three great Abrahamic faiths”. In the Old Testament the layman can see small cultural similarities but they’e certainly off-base in the messages from the New Testament. Something got “Lost in Translation” for sure.
PRCS says
Although it could be, I didn’t notice in the article that Islam was a motivating factor.
Maybe he’s just “a dangerous sexual predator” doing what sexual predators do.
john spielman says
duh? he is just imitating his faith’s founder the infamous demon possessed mass murderer thief liar and PEDOPHILE SEXUAL PREDATOR muhammed pbuh*
pbuh*-perpetual banishment unto hell
PRCS says
John,
Unless you have info that I don’t, you don’t know that.
Gray says
Yep, nothing to do with Islam, and seventy-two year old men everywhere are going around raping nine year old girls, aren’t they? After all, all the great world religions mandate sex with pre-pubescent females.
PRCS says
Gray,
There are many things to criticize Islam for.
How do you know this had something to do with Islam?
Citations, please.
“and seventy-two year old men everywhere are going around raping nine year old girls, aren’t they?”
Let’s see, how old was Sandusky when he was arrested? Oh, wait, that was with little boys.
Gray says
A 73 year old man named Mohammed ‘grooms’ a nine year old (presumably kaffur) female in Canada, and rapes her … there’s absolutely no possible explanation here, is there? …nope, it’s clearly a case of ‘mental illness’ on the man’s part, and, presumably, the girl was dressed provocatively in Western clothing, so she deserved everything she got, didn’t she? And hey, if Mohammed, ‘the perfect man’ had sex with nine year old females, well, that settles it. Who cares what kaffur law says about the age of consent.
PRCS says
You’re not just a presumptive fool, you’re a jerk.
PRCS says
And, it wasn’t in Canada.
john spielman says
well if Robert Spencer thinks it’s compatible with teachings of islam as he just illustrated above, (which it is!), then I agree with him.
PS How many nonmuslisms are named muhammed?
PRCS says
John,
Yes, it’s compatible with Islam’s teachings.
But, RS didn’t assert that Islam WAS the reason.
He asked if it could be.
gravenimage says
Muslims have been regularly grooming underaged girls in Britain.
Look back through the archives here; there are dozens such horrifying stories.
PRCS says
GI,
But there is nothing in either this JW post or the newspaper’s article indicating that Islam’s teachings were a factor in his criminal activities.
As another poster noted, “the disgusting old pig *may* just be a common or garden paedophile who never thought about his religion/mohammed at all”
Marty says
Funny how such sexual predators are overwhelmingly mohammedan.
Could it just possibly be because the man they all worship was a pedophile
polygamist murderer ?
PRCS says
Citations, please.
Michael Laudahn says
What kind of troll are you? Just read the article and Robert Spencer’s introduction, that’s all you need to answer your stupid questions. Who are you trying to fool here anyway?
PRCS says
I did.
You, apparently, didn’t.
Dolt.
PRCS says
Neither the JW post nor the Enfiled article stated that he raped the girl because he’s a Muslim.
Michael Laudahn says
The introduction gave you all the evidence you could ask for.
Now FO, there’s no-one here that you would fool.
(Note to self: ‘Don’t feed the troll.’)
PRCS says
“The introduction gave you all the evidence you could ask for. ”
Really?
“Where did Mohammed Dauhoo get the idea that this was acceptable behavior? Could it have been from the accounts of the life of the man for whom he was named, Muhammad, the prophet of Islam?
Neither the JW post nor the Enfield article stated that he raped the girl because he’s a Muslim.
Allow me to paraphrase:
What kind of moron are you?
Mirren10 says
PRCS, I don’t think anyone is suggesting that only *muslim* males commit paedophilial rape.
islam is, however, the only religion that *sacralises* it, in the person of mohammed.
So, whilst it is correct to suggest islam may *not* be the driving factor in this case, (the disgusting old pig *may* just be a common or garden paedophile who never thought about his religion/mohammed at all) it is, nevertheless, a logical assumption that islam had something to do with it.
Just as the Rotherham, and other mohammedan paedophile gangs had something to do with islam.
Ginger says
Try this – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
which deals with one town and also links to:
Rochdale sex trafficking gang convicted in 2012
Rochdale sex trafficking gang convicted in 2016
Derby sex gang
Oxford sex gang
Bristol sex gang
Telford sex gang
Peterborough sex abuse case
Banbury sex gang
Aylesbury sex gang
Keighley sex gang
Halifax sex gang
All of them have one thing in common, however much you like to protest.
PRCS says
As we’re both long time JW posters, we’re each also knowledgeable about Islam.
“I don’t think anyone is suggesting that only *muslim* males commit paedophilial rape”
No, they’re not.
But several posters here are definitely leaping–without any facts that I’m aware of–to the conclusion that Islam’s ugly teachings are what drove the individual’s criminal behavior. As you rightly note, he might just be “a disgusting old pig…who never thought about his religion/mohammed at all”
“So, whilst it is correct to suggest islam may *not* be the driving factor in this case”
True. But as Islam was not proven to be the driving factor during trial (nor, apparently, even brought into evidence), such assertions are no less faulty than the nonsense being pushed by the CNN crew in another of today’s JW posts.
As I believe you live in GB, perhaps you could do a bit of research on this particular event and post what you’ve found (time permitting, of course).
Thanks.
PRCS says
Ginger,
I protest the assumption that this criminal was driven by Islam’s teachings.
gravenimage says
Dear PRCS, Robert Spencer himself has several citations, above.
The “Prophet” Muhammed *was* a pedophile, a polygamist, and a murderer. He was also a rapist.
PRCS says
Here’s exactly what RS said, “Could it have been from the accounts of the life of the man for whom he was named, Muhammad, the prophet of Islam?
He did NOT assert that WAS the cause.
Angemon says
Well, imagine my surprise…
john spielman says
I guess muslims will be … PEDOPHILE PERVERTS just like ole moh!
A Harris USA says
My answer to this spitting match is this:: Is he a filthy pig “refugee”? Bet so!! BTW, Mohammad does encourage the sexual assault of ANY young girls!! Read the filthy Quran!!! It is all about that.
My answer in short, hang him from the nearest tree. Then bury his remains in a pig pen!! LOVE THAT idea. Then gather the rest of the pig savages, and send them back to the pig hole sand pit they came from. I can not imagine the horror the poor child will endure the rest of her life..
This is common sense, and the only way to solve this horror!!
762x51FMJ says
Islam is insidious,
Islamic law is only the Roman Code revised and corrected by Arabs; in the same way Islamic science is nothing but Greek science interpreted by the Arab brain; and again, Islamic architecture is merely a distorted imitation of the Byzantine style.
To sum up:
The Arab has borrowed everything from other nations, literature, art, science, and even his religious ideas. He has passed it all through the sieve of his own narrow mind, and being incapable of rising to high philosophic conceptions,
He has distorted, mutilated and desiccated everything.
Andre Servier – L’islam et la psychologie du musulman
200 years earlier:
The fact that numberless cities are rased from the foundation : that many countries which were once the garden of God, are now desolate wilderness; and that so many once numerous and powerful nations and their people vanished away from the earth.
Such was, and is at THIS day:
The rage, The fury, The revenge,
of these destroyers of humankind.
John Wesley (1703 – 1791), was a theologian and founder of the English Methodist movement.
“The Doctrine of Original Sin”
762x51FMJ says
Freshly quickened by the divine correction, you must apply the strength of your righteousness to another matter which concerns you as well as God.
For your brethren who live in the east are in urgent need of your help, and you must hasten to give them the aid which has often been promised them.
For, as the most of you have heard, ISIS has attacked them and have conquered as far west as the shore of the Mediterranean to Palmyra and Mosul.
Which is called the {NEW{ Arm of St. George.
They have occupied more and more of the lands of those,Christians,
and have overcome them.They have killed and captured many,
and have destroyed the churches and devastated the empire.
If you permit them to continue thus for awhile with impurity,
the faithful of God will be much more widely attacked by them.
On this account I, or rather the Lord, beseech you as Christ’s heralds
to publish this everywhere and to persuade all people of whatever rank,
foot-soldiers and knights, poor and rich,
to carry aid promptly to those Christians.
and destroy that vile ISIS
from the lands of our friends.
Urban II
Pope Blessed Urban II ca. 1035 – 29 July 1099. In regards to the first crusade.
A Harris USA says
Amen, Now Pope Urban the II is someone I could follow
carol says
The duplication is striking. I wonder if you changed it much other than inserting “ISIS”.
762x51FMJ says
Meanwhile 800 years earlier:
Champ says
pedophile-prophet muhammad did the same thing …
islam is *wholly* evil!
john spielman says
islam elevates child sexual abuse to a “sanctified’ (made holy) act – because muhammed the “perfect man” of islam was a PEDOPHILE PERVERT and murderer thief liar rapist and DEMON POSSESSED FALSE PROPHET
Champ says
All true, John!
gravenimage says
Yes–Islam does not just condone pedophilia–horrifying enough–it *sacralizes it*.
Muslim troll Rezali Mehil here characterized the “Prophet’s” rape of little nine-year-old Aisha as “ordained by Allah SWT”.
Charles says
This vile creature has earned the death penalty. And don’t have any worries about who will pull the switch. Any male member of this childs family will be more then eager to volunteer!
Anne Smith says
That may not be true. Where were the parents while all this was going on? Didn’t they express any curiosity about the lap tops and various gifts this man gave her?
Could they have been in any way complicit ? Where were they when she went to his home in Edmonton? How did she get there?
There is more to this story than meets the eye.
Mirren10 says
It may be that the poor little girl was in care, as so many of the Rotherham victims were, and social services, or her parent/parents, just couldn’t give a damn.
gravenimage says
A lot of the victims of this Muslim “grooming” are “at risk”–either with parents who are neglectful or in some sort of foster care. Often their situations are chaotic, and the adults may either not have all the information or just not care.
guide inside says
We see your pedo-mo and raise you a “MAD DOG”!!
Guest says
Hope he dies in jail
The renegade says
All things that are considered just and right by a human being with a conscience finds the exact opposite jurisprudence under Islam.
In India, Hindus believe Muhammad to be a Rakshas (demon) attracting the weak of mind and ignoble of humans to ultimately segregate the righteous from those that are evil.
Evil’s destruction will begin as a natural action to restore balance in the universe in the endless battle between good and evil. The process start’s when humanity and its conscience reaches a Nadir….
Islam like Hitler and many evil doers before him will eventually be destroyed when the good decide to no longer remain silent and take action.
But this stage will set in only when the crimes of Islam reach pandemic anx pervasive proportions and remaining silent no longer remains an option for the noble and conscionable people residing on mother earth.
Islam’s crimes have not yet reached a peak before the destruction begins…. 1.5 billion plus muslims and counting….
muslims are a counter balance to creation. Humanity’s numbers are this earth are untenable and cannot be sustained…
It is only a matter of time before mother nature’s checks and balance kicks in.. purpose of islam is to destroy…
like Smith vs. Neo in the Matrix. One’s purpose is to destroy and the others purpose is to restore balance. Once balance is reached after a sufficient amount of destruction, will Islam’s purpose for being end…. till something else that is worse than Islam rises to take its place…
As hard as it may be for people to follow what i have said above…. this is life. This is nature. This is balance…
Three components of nature: brahma (creation), vishnu (maintenance) and shiva (destruction)…. reflect three components of every creature or individual or organisation’s or other creation’s life cycle – creation, maintenance and destruction…
Everything that has a beginning has an end.. Islam will end… eventually when it reaches the end of its purpose.
Know Thy Enemy says
“…. till something else that is worse than Islam rises to take its place…”
What in hell can be worse than Islam, I can’t even imagine!
“Everything that has a beginning has an end.. Islam will end… eventually when it reaches the end of its purpose.”
What is Islam’s purpose? I say it is to show non-Muslims (the ones who are not willingly blind) that truth does not always win. Falsehoods like Islam can stay alive for a very very long time. As ex-Muslim Ali Sina said: Falsehood wins when good people do nothing!
Wellington says
Well, when your religion is founded by a psychopath, fraud and pervert, this is what should be expected from followers of such a creep (N.B., I think destroying Mohammed’s reputation is as good as destroying Islam, which needs to be mocked and destroyed, so mock and criticize away that awful man, Mohammed).
Islam is disgusting for many reasons. Reason #1 is the character of its reputed founder. Destroy the character of Mohammed and you go a long way towards destroying the worst religion ever created by man.
Mohammed is to Islam what Adolf Hitler was to Nazism. Am I making a comparison here? Damn right I am.
Mohammed is the key. Go after this bastard. He is
Wellington says
Didn’t finish, did I? Now I will.
Mohammed is the predecessor of Adolf. Said comparison helps explain why Adolf and his turgid and wretched work, Mein Kampf, remain so popular with so many followers of the worst religion of all time.
Actually and indubitably, Mein Kampf had a textual predecessor too, equally turgid and wretched, but in religious rather than secular form. It’s called the Koran. It oozes hatred for the “other” much as Mein Kampf does. These two works should always be placed beside one another so that mankind’s massive and most destructive errors reveal a similarity to all those who cherish liberty.
ALWAYS I would argue so that crystal clarity of the truth is not diminished (and throw in the Communist Manifesto for good measure here too, an equally reprehensible work). After all, the Koran and Mein Kampf are so simpatico, so deserving of one another. That’s the way I read them. That’s the way I will always read them. Wish far more did. But maybe some day this will happen. Sure hope so since freedom and other good things depend upon it.
Know Thy Enemy says
Mr. Wellington, you have insulted Hitler by comparing him with Muhammad. Hitler had many good qualities- he was not a womanizer, was not a misogynist, loved animals (click here), and was fond of dogs. Not to mention his leadership at nation building (hint: autobahn). He may have more qualities that I don’t know about. [Note: This is all sarcasm. I am no fan of Hitler.]
Muhammad was unparalleled when it comes to being evil!
Know Thy Enemy says
“Islam is disgusting for many reasons. Reason #1 is the character of its reputed founder. Destroy the character of Mohammed and you go a long way towards destroying the worst religion ever created by man.”
There are some stupid people, who after learning that Islam is bad, think that they have to attack Muslims. I try to give them the same advice as you have, that they shouldn’t attack or harass Muslims, that they should go only after Islam and Muhammad, and I explain to them why-
In Islam the relationship between deity (Allah) and believer (Muslim) is that of master and slave. More accurately, it is that of a mafia boss/organization and his henchmen. Have you ever seen those action movies where the hero takes one of the henchmen hostage, hoping that the other gangsters will stop shooting at him. Except that the gangsters don’t give a single hoot about their fellow henchman and shoot anyway. It is not that the gangsters don’t care about their fellow henchman. It is just that to them, their boss and their organization are far more important, not the fellow gangster.
It is the same case with Muslims. To them, fellow Muslims are important but not more important than the organization (Islam) or the boss (Muhammad). So we see all the time how the suicide bombers attack their enemies and don’t care if fellow Muslims die in that attack, or when Hamas attacks Israelis while hiding among women and children, or as was the latest case where this ISIS guy made sure to have his young stepson with him no matter where he was (click here for NYT article) to keep himself safe from US drones. You know, if the US killed him alongwith his stepson, then his fellow Muslims would have called him a martyr and western leftists would have called the US a child-killer. A win-win situation for the jihadi either way.
Or as has happened in the west a few times in the past, the Muslims attack their own and pin the blame on westerners. When gullible people fall for such fabricated attacks, guess who really wins? Islam wins, and that was exactly the goal behind the fabrications.
To the jihadis, even their own lives are not important. If you threaten them with death, they proudly declare “We love death more than infidels love life” and they know that fellow Muslims will declare them martyrs and will respect their parents. And their friends in the western Left will blame the US and will undermine the entire west.
So if the Muslims don’t care about fellow Muslims, or about themselves, who do they care about? Answer: They care only about the organization (Islam) and the boss (Muhammad). Those are the only two entities that matter in Islam! So we should focus our attacks primarily on them. They are the two keys that matter. Fortunately, it is very easy to attack these two entities. All we have to do is quote from Islamic texts, verbatim!
————————
“Destroy the character of Mohammed and you go a long way towards destroying the worst religion ever created by man.”
Tip: Destroying the character of Muhammad is very easy. All you have to do is quote from the [authentic] hadiths verbatim.
What is difficult is to wake up the willingly blind!
billybob says
When I began reading your comment for some reason an image of a wanted posted formed in my mind…
Wanted Dead or Alive
[picture of Muhammad here]
For genocide, murder, rape, pedophilia, larceny, and terrorism.
Suspect may be armed and dangerous.
Keep your distance and call the police.
These should be posted everywhere.
gravenimage says
Wellington was *not* calling for violence against Muslims–not sure where you got that. And the idea that many who learn that Islam is bad attack Muslims simply is not the case. The idea that hate crimes against Muslims are rife is Muslim-victim mongering, not something that is actually happening.
Know Thy Enemy says
gravenimage, please read my comment carefully. Nowhere did I accuse Wellington of calling for violence against Muslims. A careful reading should show me implying that some other stupid people, not Wellington, talk about attacking Muslims.
“And the idea that many who learn that Islam is bad attack Muslims simply is not the case.”
You are correct there, thankfully. However I often read posts, both here and elsewhere, that contain aggressive language directed at Muslims. Many times the comments contain threats of violence against Muslims, and that concerns me because you never know who might lose his temper and actually carry out the threats. Fortunately ever since 9/11 there have been very few attacks against Muslims, even if you include attacks against Sikhs who were attacked because the attackers confused them to be Muslims.
However, if violence against Muslims hasn’t happened so far, does not mean that it cannot happen in the future. Last month 3 men were arrested for plotting an attack on a mosque in Kansas. The intention behind my comment is to make sure that none of the JW’rs end up doing something stupid like this, [and yes, I know that Wellington is unlikely to attack Muslims].
IMO it is a good idea to occasionally remind everyone that violence against Muslims would not only be counter-productive, it is unnecessary because other techniques would work better to defeat Islam.
I hope I have communicated this comment clear enough, and I hope there would be no misunderstanding. Have a good day.
Know Thy Enemy says
I could have made my comment more dramatic. Well, better late than never 🙂 –
We must not attack or harass Muslims, for various reasons including that they will proudly declare themselves ‘martyrs’. Instead, we should only go after the two entities that matter to them: Islam and Muhammad. Because when we do that, we will not see them proudly declaring anything; We will only see them sweating. And THAT is the aim!
gravenimage says
Again, Wellington was *not* calling for attacks on Muslims.
No one here is calling for Muslims to be “martyred”–this story is about a Muslim raping a nine-year-old child–an *actual* crime–and you are fretting about Infidels supposedly hurting Muslims. This “backlash” is illusory–Muslims victimizing us is not.
Karen says
Thank heavens the Edmonton authorities surrounded this girl with the law’s protection, and zero tolerance for this disgusting crime. Apparently there was no hand wringing over ‘cultural differences’. They praised her for her courage, of which she has plenty. Wishing her all the best, with the hope she gets all possible support.
Marty says
The BBC & most other news sources are quick off the mark
if some enraged prole puts a pigs head in a mosque car park.
But your site is the first time I have come across this & many
similar cases.
Orwell spotted what was coming.
Gramsci, from his grave, achieved it.
Marty says
PS.
Another case that al BEEB etc have failed to report is that
in Germany a mohammedan “asylum seeker” has been charged
with the rape & murder of a top EU official’s daughter.
This is nothing to smirk about, because the daughter is innocent
& it is her father who is inflicting so much suffering on us “ordinary”
citizens due to massive third world immigration.
Phil says
And if “moderate” Muslims were disgusted by this, even more than we infidels are, then we would not have this problem of apologizing for every act one by one and making up the most insane stories about how these things can be reconciled with modernity.
Tradiguy says
Remove his genitals and deport the animal. Full stop!
dave says
apparently ISLAM is what it is. no one can change it into something, that is acceptable for the rest of the NON ISLAMIC WORLD. history has presented the REAL TRUTH of ISLAM. death, destruction & depravity are part of the package. the NON ISLAMIC WORLD will someday have to make the hard decision. ISLAMIC DEATH or FREEDOM. history is a very good teacher, if you do your homework.
gravenimage says
UK: 72-year-old Muslim jailed for grooming, repeatedly raping nine-year-old girl
…………………………
“Marrying” nine-year-old children and raping Infidels–if such the victim was–are both perfectly Islamic.
God, I hate Islam.
PRCS says
GI,
You’re better than this.
Neither RS nor the Enfield article asserted that Islam’s teachings drove him to commit his crimes.
As far as I know, the issue was not even raised during his trial.
As Mirren10 CORRECTLY noted above, “the disgusting old pig *may* just be a common or garden paedophile who never thought about his religion/mohammed at all”.
There is so much wrong with Islam, so many actual issues with “the faith” to chose from, to loudly and objectively criticize, but there’s waaaay too much conclusion jumping in this thread.
carol says
Most posters here would prefer not to look sloppy (but a misplaced splotch of tar on Islam isn’t likely to fill anyone with guilty concern).
Your point is taken – but playing devil’s advocate for SOME brand of pedophile isn’t too endearing regardless.
PRCS says
No, carol–there’s no advocacy for pedophilia in any of my posts. Period.
This is not about a misplaced splotch, but being sloppy.
And jumping to conclusions.
As Joe Friday often said, “Just the facts, ma’am”.