A stunning 96% of British Muslims do not believe that al Qaeda carried out 9/11; 31% believe that America was behind the murderous attack on its own citizens; nearly half will not report to police if they knew someone was involved in jihad plots in Syria, while 40% say they would support Sharia law. The outrageous results of this troubling survey of three thousand Muslims by Policy Exchange demonstrates how low Britain has sunk. It is a country where Sharia courts exist and are defended by Prime Minister Theresa May, who hailed the “great benefits” to Britain of Sharia teachings.
One has to wonder whether the respondents of the survey were even telling the truth about their support for Sharia, since only 40% indicated they would support it, while 50% would not so much as report known jihadi activity in Syria to police (such as a foreign fighter of the Islamic State). The stats outlined in this survey suggests that support for Sharia would be much higher.
There is also the unanswered question of who the majority of British Muslims actually think was behind the 9/11 attacks. And does it add up that “British Muslims were more likely to condemn terror attacks than the population as a whole – 90 per cent compared to 83 per cent” — when a full quarter of them do not even believe that “extremist views” even exist? There is clearly a high and unsurprising level of deception among the respondents.
“Only one in 25 British Muslims believe Al Qaeda carried out 9/11 terror attack and believe ‘wild and outlandish conspiracy theories’ – but 93 per cent say they love the UK”, by Ian Drury, Daily Mail, December 2, 2016:
Only one in 25 British Muslims believe Al Qaeda was responsible for the September 11 attacks on the US, a poll has found.
The research said it was ‘deeply troubling’ that so many were willing to ‘entertain wild and outlandish conspiracy theories’.
A survey of more than 3,000 Muslims found 96 per cent did not believe Osama Bin Laden’s terror group carried out the atrocity. Some 31 per cent thought the American government was behind the strikes on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon, which claimed almost 3,000 lives. Another 7 per cent said it was a Jewish plot, while 58 per cent did not know.
The poll, for the Policy Exchange think-tank, found 93 per cent of those quizzed had a strong attachment to the UK, and more than half wanted to fully integrate with non-Muslims in all aspects of life.
Muslims were also more engaged in the political process than the population at large, and significantly more likely to have raised money for charity or volunteered at a local school.
However, it was described as ‘a cause for concern’ that one in four British Muslims did not believe extremist views existed – despite a spate of major terror attacks and the rise of Islamic State.
Almost half would not report it to the police if someone they knew was involved with supporters of terrorism in Syria.
Meanwhile, around two in five would support the introduction of sharia law, the legal system derived from the Koran.
The poll also found 40 per cent were in favour of gender-segregated classrooms, while 44 per cent thought schools should be able to force girls to wear traditional Islamic dress.
British Muslims were more likely to condemn terror attacks than the population as a whole – 90 per cent compared to 83 per cent.
And attitudes towards many other issues, such as the NHS and immigration, were broadly in line with the rest of the nation. ICM, which carried out the survey for centre-Right think tank Policy Exchange, calls itself the ‘UK’s most respected pollster’. It questioned 3,040 British Muslims face-to-face between May and July last year and spoke to ten focus groups.
Birmingham Labour MP Khalid Mahmood, who is Muslim, said many of the findings showed the religious group were among the most ‘loyal, patriotic and law-abiding citizens’.
But in a foreword to the report, he wrote: ‘It is obviously a cause for concern that so many within our communities should doubt the very existence of [extremism], even as we face a severe and ongoing terrorist threat.
‘Even more startling is the fact that so many British Muslims seem ready to entertain wild and outlandish conspiracy theories … believing that dark forces are at work to “do us down” as Muslims. It is deeply troubling that this seems to have led a not-insignificant minority to believe that the world is at the mercy of the machinations of dark, anti-Muslim forces.’ The research also revealed the Muslim Council of Britain, often billed as a spokesman for the community, reflected the views of only 4 per cent of those polled. But in a statement, the council said the Policy Exchange was trying to ‘delegitimise the organisation’….

Angemon says
Huh, you realize that others can read that report, right? They are not limited to your characterization of the results.
Cretius says
One cannot ignore the fact that security sources worldwide estimate 15%-25% of Muslim refugees are Islamic terrorists.
JOHN SPIELMAN says
and the other 75-85% give tacit approval
A Harris USA says
Of course the terrorists are Muslims!!! What part of Islam do they not understand!!! Heads up America ! Obama just signed a deal with Australia that we are to take over 2000 Muslim refugees that they do not want. FOR THE REASON that they may be related to ISIS, and the ultimate traitor Obama says we will take them!!! Start contacting whom ever you can in Congress and so on, that this is NOT going to happen… Just before Trump takes office, this is slated to take place.
ALL the other ideas that are on the new Trump agenda, they must be put on hold until we stop the invasion!!! Get HOT Jihad Watch readers, Obama is still turning our nation into a sewer!!!
linnte says
Ah maybe so, but 100% of the refugess are the Army of Allah. Even the women and children. When we consider the Muslim Brotherhoods goal of “Bringing down our miserable house from within”, that is the goal of every Muslim.
Dom107 says
I heard on the mainstream media that the Germans have estimated that there are 40,000 Jihadists living in Germany !!!!.If that does’t convince Germans to kick out that old frump Merkel at the coming election in 2017 and vote for AfD nothing barring a load of atrocities beforehand has any chance.
No politician should be allowed to run for a 4th term because apart from the cataclysmic mistake she has made it will be equivalent to absolute power and as we all know power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely
Islam the religion of killers says
Confirming the FACT Islam is a creeping cancer ,,,,, on it’s way to family near you ………
Resistant says
His cancer is spreading fast but as cancer kills its host, it’s on its way to destruction by destroying other cultures more evolved obviously.
Voytek Gagalka says
In WHAT Muslims “believe”? Of course, in their “allah” and his “messenger.” Why we must bother ourselves with that they “don’t believe that al Qaeda was behind 911”? How can they? Whatever there is not contained within the Qur’an, Hadith and Sira, they are NOT obligated to believe!
Resistant says
It used to be “Great” Britain. What a liberal mess to have let these people settle in. Sharia law? Retards
common sense says
The failure of the FBI and the CIA under Bill Clinton were preparatory in the tragedy of errors and circumstances that led to 911. The enemy within uses whatever platform or political adherence they can find to perpetuate attacks against us. Bleeding heart Liberals are a prime target and our collective of leader’s job is not to worry about Islam’s reputation but to protect ourselves from all enemies foreign and domestic.
A Muslim name is behind every Jihad attack unless they are converts and then are given a Muslim name anyway.
Damocles Junior says
The enemy within can also mean any and every Muslim that is employed in the CIA, The FBI, Police at any level, any level of the Public Service including a janitor and Air traffic Control.
I have only 2 questions re the many conspiracy theories about 9-11;
1, How is it that in the world’s busiest air space, surrounded by military and civilian ATC that no one noticed or questioned that something was seriously wrong?
2, I have yet to hear a plausible explanation as to why those towers collapsed almost like a perfectly controlled demolition job?
I will listen to any answer that might enlighten me.
Michael Copeland says
It was established years ago (Vance Packard: “The Hidden Persuaders”) that face-to-face interviews are notoriously unreliable. A conclusion was that speakers will give an answer that sets them in a good light.
gravenimage says
UK: 96% of Muslims do not believe al Qaeda was behind 9/11 jihad attacks
………………………………..
More Islamic cognitive dissonance, since so many of these Muslims openly admit that they would do nothing to stop Jihad terror. This would *hardly* be the case if they really believed that Jihad terror attacks like 9/11 were “un-Islamic”.
salim says
In real life I still count as a Muslim and can say this: Muslims learned about 9/11 from Aljazeera tv, which from day one promoted the strange conspiracy theory. 15 years on and Muslims still don’t believe the official 9/11 story, I never came across a Muslim who does.
A side note: All the weird conspiracies that arise in the Arab world within hours of the event were later believed by many people in the west, example Diana’s death.
gravenimage says
But Salim, Muslims also love 9/11, and consider it the “gold standard” of Jihad terror attacks. They would not have danced in the streets if they really believed that it had been pulled off by George Bush or the Jooooooos.
commonsense says
gravenimage:
You are correct, and have, as I’m sure you know, provided a compelling example of the dualism of thought (I use the word “thought” rather loosely) which characterizes Islam, based upon the Islamic principle of naskh, or abrogation. Naskh allows contradictory ideas to be held or believed simultaneously. Muhammed, more than a millenium before George Orwell, discovered how to implement and use doublethink as a tool to promote political and religious hegemony.
gravenimage says
True, commonsense.
salim says
Yes they loved and they still do. I can explain but I am happy with Bill Warner’s explanation on Dualism in islamic thinking. it is very interesting.
Please look for it!
Terence says
Every Muslim country condemned the attack and loss of life. Here is a report from the German press : Annette Krüger Spitta of the ARD’s (German public broadcasting) TV magazine Panorama states that footage not aired shows that the street surrounding the celebration in Jerusalem is quiet. Furthermore, she states that a man in a white T-shirt incited the children and gathered people together for the shot. The Panorama report, dated September 20, 2001, quotes Communications Professor Martin Löffelholz explaining that in the images one sees jubilant Palestinian children and several adults but there is no indication that their pleasure is related to the attack. The woman seen cheering (Nawal Abdel Fatah) stated afterwards that she was offered cake if she celebrated on camera, and was frightened when she saw the pictures (of the attack) on television afterwards.
Dom107 says
Funny you should mention Al Jazeera TV.Sometime before 9/11 I missed a plane at Heathrow airport in London and had to stay in a hotel overnight.I watched an interview on Al Jazeera with Osama Bin Laden in my room where he categorically said the brothers were planning something big in America.
He declined to give any details.The CIA/FBI should have been aware of this,plus the fact there was a previous attack on at least one of the twin towers and some of the plotters were suspected or known players.Also the guy who only wanted to know how to take off but not land a plane should have set the alarm bells ringing.The box cutters should have been regarded as knives when going through the airline gate and the terrorists stopped at that point so there was a lot of security failures explainable only by the fact that America had not suffered from this type of terrorism before.
The idea that George Bush approved this event is sheer distorted conspiracy theory crap as his time in office was blighted by this and following events.He wasn’t a smart man but not that dumb or cruel.
I have noticed that the truth is a very flexible thing not only with Arabs but all the Mediterranean people
especially Greeks. I know Greeks and I inwardly laughed when they were admitted into the EC with all its rules and regulations and forecast that it would all end in tears.The Greeks don’t even obey their own traffic regulations and many didn’t even pay tax.
The UK didn’t join the single currency because they didn’t think their Economy was ready to take the tight discipline a single currency demands.The Greeks lied at official level about the state of their Economy to get in and that failed Quantum Chemist,the old Frump Merkel believed them and let them in with predictable results.
Germans you can lessen more damage in the future by voting for AfD otherwise we might have to build another wall (a la Trump) around YOU !!!!!
Simone Fields says
I wish Memri TV on YouTube got more hits, there is no better example of how the Middle East Arab mind works by watching this.
It never fails to get my blood boiling.
Blangwort says
For this level of disbelief, there has to be indoctrination somewhere. Gee. I wonder where it might be? I don’t suppose they say this stuff to each other in the Mosque, do they? Naw. That’s a place of prayer and worship, right? Why would anyone make conspiracy theories there?
(The sarcasm is really thick here for the humor impaired)
Dom107 says
Mosques are a land of make-believe ! Dangerous make-believe !!!!
Ross Lloyd says
No, 96% of Moslems lie directly to your face…
Joe Rogue says
Westerners just don’t realize that not only 911 but almost every terror event has been considered by majority of muslims as ‘manufactured by the Zionist & Western ‘puppeteers’.
So for instance like in Indonesia, the world’s largest muslims country where whenever some terror event occurs then immediately almost all of their government officers, political commentators and islamic preachers CRY and SHOUT about WESTERN CONSPIRACY !
Hence Indonesia is a Highly FERTILE breeding ground for radicalism to flourish since whenever some church being blown up or christians being slaughtered yet awkwardly it wouldn’t make muslims to question their own religion but instead because they’ve already been brainwashed with hatred and ‘conspiracy theory’ it would just strengthened their hatred toward the West.
Because of that in Indonesia the Radicals have this sort of DOUBLE ADVANTAGE, in one way they would manage to spread fear and oppression toward religious minorities while on the other hand when they died they would receive HUGE SYMPATHY from majority of Indonesians , meaning more and more Indonesian is moving further into Islamo-Fascism while also increase the hatred and Anti-Western sentiment.
here’s how MOST Indonesians treat their JIHADIST TERRORISTS:
1) Thousands of people attended the funeral of Imam Samudera one of Bali Bombings perpetrators and were giving their open support! http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/family-members-and-supporters-of-imam-samudra-one-of-the-news-photo/83616156#family-members-and-supporters-of-imam-samudra-one-of-the-three-bali-picture-id83616156
http://nasional.news.viva.co.id/news/read/8187-jenasah-imam-samudra-dimakamkan
2) Again Thousands of people attended the funeral of Mr. Santoso the Poso Terrorist Leader in Indonesia ( he was well known for his cruel sadistic acts toward christians ) giving their support and cheering him as INDONESIAN HERO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoCRbFvyTlk
FYI Indonesia besides being the largest muslim country in the world has also very manipulatively claimed itself as the most moderate and tolerant muslim majority country in the world… If you want to know the ‘moderate muslims’ really are, just look at how these MODERATES hail those sadistic terrorists as their INDONESIAN HERO
gravenimage says
Joe, I first saw this bizarre cognitive dissonance in Indonesia just after 9/11. An American journalist was interviewing a group of men and boys, who were all vociferously shaking their heads and saying that the attack could not possibly have come from Muslims.
So far, this sounds pretty standard, right?
But there was a bizarre twist–one of the men was wearing one of those horrific t-shirts featuring the burning Twin Towers with a leering Osama bin Laden looming over them. No one would wear such a shirt if they didn’t believe bin Laden was responsible for 9/11, and if he didn’t *approve* of the attack.
None of the group mentioned this–nor did the journalist. It was, until that time, one of the most surreal things I had ever seen.
I have since learned, of course, that this grotesque double-think is all too common among Muslims, and that few Westerners call them on it.
Joe Rogue says
Let me explain how not only Indonesians but most of muslims think,
Concerning 911 they think Obama Bin Laden was so strong and powerful that US had to find a way to justify Afghanistan’s ‘invasion’ and in the same time forming International coalition ( since US was allegedly so powerless to face Bin Laden alone). And in most muslims twisted way of thinking the way which US had chosen to justify Afghan and Iraq invasion along with forming international coalition to invade islamic countries was through CIA & Mossad creating a huge catastrophic event called 911.
You might think this kind of argument is so absolutely idiotic to be taken seriously by any sane person however the fact is this is what majority of muslims believe.
So Yes! Muslims believe Bin Laden did play a crucial role in 911 but not in the same way that we or any person with healthy brain would think.
Guest says
Who in the hell do they think caused 9/11?
gravenimage says
George Bush, the CIA, Mossad, random Jews…
I don’t think most Muslims actually believe this, Guest–they just don’t like anything that “makes Islam look bad”.
Dacritic says
The ones who don’t believe 9/11 was carried out by Muslims, are they the so-called reformists? You know, the group that is almost as dangerous as the terrorists themselves, still using all sorts of theories to con(vince) the public that Islam is or can be a religion of peace? Who then do they think was responsible? The Zionists? The Illuminati? The Rothschilds?
Sonshine says
I am a long time Jihadwatch reader and supporter… and buyer of Robert’s books, and am as opposed to Islam as much as anyone here, but re 911 I confess to not accepting the official conspiracy theory, though I did for the first two years after 911. Thus it is not only some Muslims who question who was behind 911, but also some dedicated Jihadwatch supporters. Engineers and pilots, along with victims families are among the doubters.
If you spend a few hours at http://www.911research.wtc7.net looking especially at issues to do with the collapses… photos and videos (frame by frame), you may also come to question it. Specifically, read up on the construction of the towers, then reflect on the fact that the collapse of both towers occurred at a little over free fall speed…meaning that the structure of the buildings did not impede in any way the speed of the collapses…meaning the structure had to have been progressively removed before (split seconds before) the collapse zones reached it. The planes flying into them did not cause the buildings to collapse. There were no concrete slabs in the rubble. Thousands of tons of concrete was turned to fine dust, which filled Manhatten.
Building 7, which few people seem to be aware of, collapsed at 5.20pm in the afternoon (7 hours after the towers fell) at almost bang on free fall speed, so the same applies. No plane went into WTC7.
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see and understand that the collapses bear all the hallmarks of controlled demolition. I would love to be able to point to 911 as a jihadist attack but I do not believe it was. I would love to be persuaded otherwise, but nothing I have heard thus far has convinced me, nor been compelling.
Babs says
With respect, you are not a structural engineer, and you are very gullible. Structural engineers without an axe to grind and with more than a grain of sense, would be asking you about the amount of explosives needed to bring about the sabotage you describe, and not least how the saboteurs would be able to hide it or keep it secret from the thousands of employees who were daily in the Twin Towers.
The only conspiracy here is on the part of the barbarians who killed so many by flying aeroplanes into the Twin Towers that day and those who helped them.
People like you, however, are not even that – you are pitifully gullible if you believe unquestioningly what you see in a film meant to bend your brain. It must have fallen on fertile ground. Critical thinker you most certainly aren’t
Simone Fields says
My husband is a chartered quantity surveyor and says that it had a soft core and was constructed as a tube with a soft core as opposed to a concrete core with concrete/trussed floors on steel trusses. Once the tube is punctuated by an aircraft loaded with fuel the steel, these fairly lightweight steel trusses will melt and collapse as there is no support.
So progressive collapse is inevitable from weight of the floors above in those kind of temperatures.
Sonshine says
The towers did not have a ‘soft core’, I don’t know where you husband got that idea from. It is simply false. The core of each tower consisted of 47 vertical steel columns that ran from bedrock to the top, tapering as they went. The perimeter of the building was a steel frame tube matrix. The floors were slung between the core and the outside ‘tube’. One can imagine the floors disconnecting from the core and the ‘tube’ and pancaking down, only that did not happen. If it had, there was no reason at all for the core or the ‘tube’ to collapse, and yet all the massive steel framing of the building was shredded, and the thousands of tons of concrete in the floors pulverised. No steel framed building had ever before and has never afterward, collapsed as the result of fires, even though there have been fires of far greater intensity and duration in other steel framed skyscrapers. Neither the planes nor the fires caused the collapses.
As for Babes pathetic contribution. How does he know I am not a structural engineer? How does he know that my source of information was a film? Perhaps he should go and look at the website I linked to and spend a few hours there. If he did he may be a bit more circumspect in any future contribution he makes on this matter.
Sonshine says
Further the fires were almost out immediately before the collapses. Firemen who got to the crash zone radio this back to their base. But even so the, fires were not hot enough to melt steel or cause collapses. It was only jet fuel…
If neither the planes nor the fires caused the collapses, then it was an inside job… end of story…
gravenimage says
Uh huh–and what about all the other Jihad terror attacks since 9/11–almost 30,000 of them? Were they call carried out to “make Muslims look bad”, as well?
And what about all the Muslims *celebrating* 9/11? Would they have done so if was pulled off by–who? George Bush? The Illuminati? Opus Dei?
Rick Spencer says
Thank you, Sonshine, for writing this. Very well put.
I am anti Islam and I continue to believe that people who believe the ‘official’ story must be really stupid. Thick. PERIOD!
There is no way that a rag-head in a cave in Afghanistan could have been behind 9/11. No way!
As with Building 7, the Twin Towers were imploded. Yes, Jihad Watchers, IMPLODED!
A FALSE FLAG OPERATION WAS NEEDED… and Bush, Cheney, Giuliani and cohorts organised it! Do your research.
Mayor Rudy Giuliani organised an illegal clean-up of the CRIME SCENE immediately after the attack! Why?
Think for yourselves. (And, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HZUc3AdBdc, amongst others.)
By the way, there was an IMMEDIATE rush to clean up debris at the Pentagon too. Men in suits and ties were hurriedly clearing up the CRIME SCENE. Why? No way, in any stretch of the imagination, did a huge Boeing fly into that building!
The biggest CONSPIRACY THEORY is the official story itself. Start by thinking about how and WHY Building 7 collapsed!
Sonshine says
Thanks Rick. It would be more correct to say that the towers ‘exploded’ but Building 7 ‘imploded’. Much of the debris from the towers was thrown out from the buildings, even with some lengths of steel beams being stuck into surrounding buildings like arrows. Most of this rubble rained down on the low rise buildings of the WTC and yet these low rise buildings did not collapse. Nothing however was thrown out of Building 7. The collapse of WTC7 was completely internal with the centre of the building going first as clearly seen in one of the videos…
Hugh Fitzgerald says
“Muslims were also more engaged in the political process than the population at large, and significantly more likely to have raised money for charity or volunteered at a local school”
“More engaged”but for what? Good government, or pushing for greater Muslim political influence, which is hardly something non-Muslims should take delight in.
As for raising money for charity — one would like to know for which charities, and whether this is non-denominational benevolence, or zakat, meant solely for other Muslims.
And “volunteering at a local school”– again, one would want to know more about what this “volunteering” means for the running of the school, the subjects taught, the texts used, the subtle pressures possibly felt by teachers and administrators from these Muslim parents.
gravenimage says
Moreover, Hugh, “Zakat”, while often translated as “charity”, is really anything that furthers the cause of Islam. Sometimes this is things like collecting monies to help poor people go on the Hadj, or to build a new Mosque–but just as often, it is funding *Jihad terror*.
Zakat that actually goes for real charity–funding schools, hospitals, orphanages, even if all that collected goes to Muslims–is quite a bit rarer. That’s why so many charities that aid Muslims in time of disaster are run by the “filthy Infidels”.
Babs says
This is not “stunning” and neither is it remarkable. It’s typical of the ignorant, intellectually-challenged followers of the muslim “prophet.”
duh swami says
Muslims are reluctant to ‘slander’ other Muslims…It is much easier to join the ‘truthers’ and blame the evil kuffar ‘black ops for it…I wonder how kuffar managed to get 19 Muslims to martyr themselves in the name of kufr…And if this was not a jihad attack, why is SK Mohammad locked up in Gitmo as the ‘mastermind’?
gravenimage says
Good question, Swami.
Walter Sieruk says
This only means that 96%of the Muslims living in the UK are in a state of denial about 9/11 and the vicious and murders essence of the Islamic terror entity, Al Qaeda..The emotion of denial is a very strong emotion. This is not only seen in the above news item but is in non-religious things as well. As ,for example a man in the USA who had a con- artist and sham him out of money might be in denial, for a time,that this man he respected, liked and even trusted was in reality a lying thief. In time the man who was conned comes out of his denial , then understands the guy is a liar and criminal and contacts the police. Likewise a foolish women might marry someone she only had known for only a few months and the after that fool hoax of a “marriage” ceremony then find out the hard way about this by this “man” showing his true colors and turns malicious.. That woman ,at first , might go into denial and hopes that he will become. “nice” again. Which will not happen. therefore she, in time, comes out of her denial ,then understands this “man” ‘s an abuser and a fiend and contacts a divorce lawyer Of course when it comes to the religion ,specifically the religion that is Islam ,the follower of that Islam, a Muslim , who is in denial , that person will not out out the denial.This may explained about those 96 % of those Muslims in the UK
Walter Sieruk says
That 96 % of the Muslims now living in the UK don’t believe that the Koranic based jihad network Al Qaeda means, of course, that 96% of the Muslims who live in the UK are in a mental state of denial.
In contrast , in the USA there are some Muslims who acknowledge that the jihad entity Al Qaeda had carried those brutal and deadly jihad attacks on September 11, 2001. Instead of being in denial they show their Islamic heartlessness by telling callous bad “jokes ” about 9/11. As, for example. on the day of September 9 2016 some man I know who works as a security guard at a public place told me a Muslim actually had the nerve to walk over to him and said to him two Muslim “Jokes” about 9/11. As if it was a funny subject. It’s wrong to even try to “joke” about 9/11. Talk about bad “jokes” those two are the very much worst of all. The first was “What is the difference between September 11, 20001 and a cow?” answer “You don’t keep milking a cow after fifteen years.” Not only is that “joke” awful but those Muslims trying to be funny by say that cruel thing do have some gall because they have no room to talk . For they are still are “milking” the topic of the Crusades and the Crusade have been over for well more than seven hundred years. What gall they have! The second “Muslim “joke” about 9/11 is “On September 11, 2001 the people trapped on the upper floors of the WTC had ordered their pizza sent to them plane.” To say that such “humor” is terrible is an understatement. Furthermore, those Muslim who say those “jokes” are really only exposing their own sick, vicious, callous and heartless Islamic mindset.”
Ronen says
I guess there is no corner of Islam, no matter how marginal or insignificant, which is not twisted and down right rotten to its very core. This religion/ideology produces some of the ugliest human phenomena of our times.
On the one hand applauding it and on the other denying it.
On the one hand proud of it and on the other blaming others.
Ronen says
P.s. “we are such heroes to bring America to its knees” or “we are the poor victims of prejudice and racism”.
And on and on…
762x51FMJ says
Way back some conspiracy nutcase was trying to allege that George Bush was piloting one of the spotter aircraft, guiding the planes into the buildings by remote control personally… The video in Florida at the elementary school was prerecorded..
Marxist Leftist groups with printing presses ( The Internet) pushed these narratives to news sources translated worldwide…
They reported George Bush ordered the 911 attack so Rockwell stock would go up a few points and he could sell short and clean up… World War 3 is coming for 3 cents a share.. they squawked,
The Michael Moore’s of the world. The assassination of George Bush movie etc..
Darfur massacres with photo shopped images of George Bush waving the machetes personally
saying theirs no oil here so why should we stop it..
They wanted to equate George Bush with the evil aspects of Islam, and equate up and coming Barack Obama as the bearer of a newer peaceful Islam that all Americans are welcome to take their place beneath them..
..Obama will embrace an “Arab spring” They said .. And make the world a peaceful ISIS inspired utopia…
America has voted against the establishment that has brought horror and desolation to a large portion of the earth.
Obama/Hillary/Kerry have caused a genocide and refugee crisis of biblical proportions,
If you want to know why they lost the election it was because more people looked at the real world, instead of living in a media bubble.
A safe space of total ignorance that every person knows will eventually collapse when it is invaded by an angry mob of machete wielding maniacs…
Matthieu Baudin says
“… Almost half would not report it to the police if someone they knew was involved with supporters of terrorism in Syria…”
I wonder what proportion of local Muslims would report the genital mutilation of young girls to the police or welfare authorities and what fraction would report on the clandestine arranged marriages of underage girls? These are issues with which the current Female British Prime Minister cannot find the time to concern herself.