Of course they deny it, but it’s unmistakable. It has happened too often to be honestly denied. What happened in Keighley is too much like what happened in Rotherham. 1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims in Rotherham, and “several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
“Police Deny Political Correctness After Report Finds Schoolgirl Raped by Muslim Gang Was Let Down,” by Liam Deacon, Breitbart, December 8, 2016:
Police have denied “cultural niceties or political correctness were a barrier” after a damning report found dozens of opportunities were missed to protect a schoolgirl repeatedly gang raped by a Muslim gang.
When she was just 13 and 14, between 2011 and 2012, the victim was “raped in car parks, parks and churchyards” in the small town of Keighley, near Bradford in the North of England, a court has previously heard.
The gang of 12 were jailed last year for more than 140 years between them, but the leader, described as an “evil mastermind”, Arif Choudhury, escaped and is thought to have fled to Bangladesh.
Despite the seeming similarities, the Keighley review claimed “no evidence has come to light of a culture of denial” similar to that found in Rotherham.
Priti Patel, chairman of the board which conducted the Serious Case Review, said they explored the concern that the gang had been overlooked because of their Muslim background, but “it just so happened these perpetrators were from a particular community”.
However, like in Rotherham, the review found multiple opportunities were missed to protect the girl from the horrific crimes, with the police placing some blame on her.
According to the Telegraph & Argus, the report says there was “confusion and disagreement” between the various agencies and a “consistent failure” to assess her circumstances properly.
It says: “When she was raped by her main groomer in May 2011, she made three separate disclosures to agencies about this incident… [but] tended to withdraw allegations once she had made them.”
This led to the authorities forming a view of the victim as unreliable, which “saw her withdraw further into silence and made her more vulnerable to the power of her abusers”.
David Niven, who chairs the district’s independent safeguarding children board, also argued that the failing had nothing to do with political correctness.
He said there was “no denying” the men were “Asian”, but said that sexual abuse cases from Jimmy Savile to allegations of abuse in sport showed perpetrators could be from any background.
Detective Superintendent Nick Wallen, of West Yorkshire Police, agreed. He said: “I don’t think cultural niceties or political correctness were a barrier here, in this particular case.
“I think we missed opportunities because of our failings as an organisation to understand the problem but I do think in the future we need to watch very carefully that fear of offending, fear of causing offence, or upsetting minority ethnic groups does not stand in the way of robust policing.”
Det. Supt. Wallen added: “It’s very clear that West Yorkshire Police failed this girl on a number of levels. It’s certainly clear there were opportunities to safeguard her that were missed….

Mark A says
After Rotherham, nobody believes the British police justifications of their failure to deal with Muslim rape gangs.
Mirren10 says
Indeed.
Their pusillanimity and PC mouthings are egregious. Scumbags.
I used to have respect for the Plod; no more.
Angemon says
That would be my guess too…
GrahamTurner says
I draw your attention to the following quotations.
Winston Churchill on Islam
“how dreadful are the curses that Islam lays on its votaries
it is as dangerous in a man as rabies in a dog Compare this with
Adolf Hitler on Islam.
· It has been our misfortune to have the wrong religion – Christianity with all its weakness and flabbiness. Islam would have been more compatible to us than Christianity
a long-suffering British patriot
A Harris USA says
Mark A, Just look at this lovely group of savage pigs….Who in their right mind would let this group into their back yard to start with???? There is your mental disorder!!! Why would you sic these pigs on your daughters, wives and mothers??? YOU ARE MENTALLY ILL IN THE UK!!!!!
GET YOUR TRUMP ON AND GET RID OF THE PIGS!!!!!
Sharon Warren says
You said it stronger than I could have, but I whole heartedly agree!
KS
damian says
This is insane, it’s high time we call a spade a spade if they found to be Muslim they should say it ought and stop keeping quite how long are they going to live in fear in their own country,pleass the UK should sit up that’s why I am happy. Donald trump came forth to bring America back to its glory,
Hindu American says
Police have denied “cultural niceties or political correctness were a barrier”. Then what was it? Brexit vote duties or unforeseen fog over the channel or an act of parliament?
LR says
How about….We are just really lousy cops…totally crappy investigators…although, I like the “fog over the channel” excuse…
Bob says
Parliament is afraid of islam, too – they might offend Saudi and the otherbrotten Gulf states!
Myles says
Methinks the British government and business interests value Saudi petor $ more than their daughters. The pc police are utterly contemptible, who should be prosecuted for complicity in the molesting and rapes by these muslims.
medaber_emet says
This is why the english will be extinct
David says
Hope springs eternal
gravenimage says
UK cops deny political correctness involved in missed opportunities to stop Muslim rape gang
………………………….
Who believes this bs?
Mirren10 says
”He said there was “no denying” the men were “Asian”, but said that sexual abuse cases from Jimmy Savile to allegations of abuse in sport showed perpetrators could be from any background.”
Oh, ffs.
No-one denies child abuse can be committed by anyone. What is at issue here, or *should* be, is that islam *sacralises* this kind of abuse. And this was systematic and ongoing abuse carried out by men who believe they have a perfect right to do it, because their ‘holy’ scriptures tell them they do.
How stupid are the police ? The Bedfordshire police, who recently attempted to justify their use of the ‘one finger salute’ in their campaign against ‘islamophobia’ are a case in point. I sent them an email, complaining about their egregious claptrap, enquiring when they were going to start a campaign against **anti-semitism**, and pointing out this sort of ridiculous PC nonsense was outside their remit, since they were *paid* to a) uphold the law, and b) to arrest those who broke it, not start ridiculous PC/MC campaigns designed to destroy free speech.
All I got in return was an anodyne reply.
They follow orders from their masters, and I also pointed out their behaviour and actions were an **exact** mirror image of the behaviour and actions of police in Nazi Germany, and the Stasi. They are beneath contempt. Scum and quislings.
Aardvark says
The Jimmy Saville case, which was all over the headlines, and the current crop if football trainee cases, which are also in every newspaper and every news broadcast, are, I believe, being used by the authorities as some sort of smoke screen to make the mohammedan child abuse seem less awful, and to reduce coverage of them.
But of course the mohammedan child abuse, which is allowed, or even mandated, by their filthy ‘religion’, is actually far worse than the isolated cases where the perpetrators knew that what they were doing was wrong.
The mohammedans think that what they are doing is perfectly OK, and what they are doing is happening NOW. For those reasons the priority of the police should be to deal with them first, rather than the historical cases.
I have a great deal of sympathy for the footballers who were abused in their youth. But I have much more sympathy for the young girls who are being abused today, and will be abused again tomorrow.
Bill says
Political correctness is part of it, but I think that the better part of it is that the UK police are afraid to go after the rape gangs or Islamic criminals of any description. The police are outgunned and outnumbered and they know it. Were they to enforce the law they would be beaten to a pulp or even slaughtered in the streets. It is easier and safer for them to turn a blind eye to it.
Paul says
It’s long past time to forget this “political correctness” garbage. “Politicial correctness” is all about censorship and refusing to tell the truth.
PRCS says
1. Let’s say–for the sake of argument–that the police WERE fearful that a full, complete and honest investigation would result in name calling.
2. Were Islam’s ugly teachings about sex slaves, and such, brought up, given as evidence, alleged to be, or proven to be the driving force behind these crimes?
I ask, because I’ve not personally seen such in any relevant articles. Did Islam’s teachings drive them to commit those crimes–or not?
3. If those well documented teachings were NOT alleged or proven factors–in court–should the police then not be held in even greater contempt for merely THINKING they’d be subjected to name calling?
dave says
guess no one can hold the police ACCOUNTABLE in the UK? put the whole police department on trial for criminal negligence , malfeasance and general stupidity. demand an open hearing for the public to see how stupid they are.
Linda Rivera says
They’re NOT stupid, they are EVIL.