“Sentencing Alanezy, Mr Justice Gilbart said there was no excuse for the attack but people had to take responsibility for their safety when on nights out.”
This is indeed so, since the British government has filled the country with young Muslims such as Yaqoob Alanezy. The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.
“Outrage as judge says woman sex attack victim was ‘foolish’ for drinking too much,” by Chris Osuh, Manchester Evening News, December 2, 2016:
One of the country’s top judges has labelled a drunken woman who was sexually assaulted and almost kidnapped ‘foolish’ for drinking so much she left herself open to attack.
The 20-year-old woman was pounced on by teenager Yaqoob Alanezy who put his arms around her, kissed her and then dragged her 30 yards down a street in south Manchester .
Sentencing Alanezy, Mr Justice Gilbart said there was no excuse for the attack but people had to take responsibility for their safety when on nights out.
The High Court judge said the victim only had a ‘befuddled recollection of events’ adding: “I’m sure it was a frightening incident. She got very, very drunk. It doesn’t excuse what happened, but people have to make sure they protect themselves and guard against this – she made herself very vulnerable.
“The law seeks to protect victims such as this from their own foolishness.
“(The complainant) had got herself drunk, was in a public place, unable to protect herself and the law must be seen to protect vulnerable people from being picked on by those who spot their vulnerability and choose to attack them.”
Alanezy, 18, attacked the woman after their paths crossed at Anson Road, in the Victoria Park area of south Manchester, in the early hours of August 20.
He dragged her down the street before they both fell to the floor.
The incident was stopped by a passer-by who saw the victim trying to push Alanezy off her as he lay on top of her in the street.
The concerned witness shouted ‘oi’ and ran over, prompting Alanezy to leave the scene.
Alanezy later pleaded guilty to sexual assault and kidnap – relating to the period where he dragged the woman along the road – at Manchester Crown Court .
He has now been given 22 months in a young offenders institution.
The court heard the victim had ended up in the area, which she did not know, after drinking in Manchester city centre and being invited to a flat by two men she met in town.
She fell asleep at the flat, left after waking in the early hours, was attacked by Alanezy in the street shortly afterwards, and has little recollection of events, the court heard.
Oliver Jarvis, defending Alanezy, who is from Kuwait and has been served with deportation papers, said the offence happened a couple of months after he turned 18 and that he had a supportive family determined to keep him on the right track.
“He tells me he’s deeply ashamed and deeply embarrassed”, Mr Jarvis added. “In Kuwait there’s no alcohol and the defendant came over here, tried alcohol for the first time and it’s been a real problem since, as a way of dealing with deep boredom….
Deep boredom? Why not get a job?

Charles says
Yet another JIHAD enabler!
What a fool, imbecile and idiot!
Unfit for the bench in ANY COUNTRY!
Alan Doud says
Agreed that this judge should be removed. No citizen in any condition should have to fear being attacked. That sort of thinking would suggest a person with a disability shouldn’t be out as well. Boredom as a defense for rape and kidnapping. He should have received much more then 22 months. Boredom, drinking and being a foreigner doesn’t give on a license to do such a thing.
Jim says
Rapes, violence, and evil do not happen because a woman who was clearly drunk, and should not have been there in the first place. No, they happen because the UK and many other Western European nations invited millions of people who worship a religion that sanctifies rape, murder, and violence as holy acts that merit eternal beatitude instead of a lifelong sentence behind bars.
A Harris USA says
Just look at the fool!! He is really a sot !! Bet he drinks himself into a fit on a daily basis!! This takes me back to the days when judges would say the victim was at fault for wearing mini skirts, that provoked the rape!!! Really?? Bet if the rape was committed by a Brit, the judge would have thrown the book at him.
Hope in the UK they can recall these freaks on the bench!!
Mac-101 says
G-d bless the passer by who intervened. See, There is still hope for England!
gravenimage says
Hear, hear!
LB says
Yes. So unfortunate for other hundreds of thousands of underage little (mostly white) girls in the UK that there wasn’t a passerby yelling “oi” at the time of their repeated gangrape and sexual grooming by muslim rape gangs. But other than that, UK is looking good!
Bill says
Rolling Stone had to publish a false story of a rape. Why don’t they just report on the multitude of real rapes in Europe at the hands of the Islamist invaders? The question is rhetorical, because that rape is OK with the mainstream media and enabled by them.
Guest says
Off with his head!
Angemon says
Can’t wait to hear the “feminists” complaining about “rape culture” and “patriarchy” on this one. They’d be up in arms if the perp was some white, blue-collar worker, so I’m certain they’ll do the same in this case.
Any minute now…
Any minute…
somehistory says
He should have taken another route for his admonishment to use sound judgment.
The sentencing of the rapist was not the time to tell the woman how foolish she was to not stay sober in a strange part of town and going to the men’s apartment alone.
Putting the two together will only encourage moslim scum to assault when the woman has been drinking, and then use that as a defense.
gravenimage says
Very true, somehistory.
D-spot says
If, as Mr.Justice Gilbart,suggests, this young woman who was unable to protect herself, had carried pepper spray, or other deterrent, and used it on her attacker, she would now be the one facing prison.
Question? Would this hinge on the law of self defense, or hair splitting by the amount of force needed to fend off such attacks – this would interest me. Any lawyers out there?
John A. Marre says
The wig is too tight. It has affected his brain.
duh swami says
You beat me to that one John…I might add that real men don’t wear wigs…
Shmooviyet says
What brilliant BS from the defense..
He used alcohol for the first time, it has become a “problem ever since” (?), and Alanezy is a victim of boredom. He’s ashamed that *the booze* made him do it. He “came over here” and look what happened– to him.
Blame all but the attacker for his actions. How convenient to have excuses for both getting drunk, and attempting a rape.
How did he deal with boredom in Kuwait?
gravenimage says
Good post, Shmooviyet.
I’ve only been really tipsy once, a long time ago. I got giggly and sentimental. It was a bit embarrassing, and I didn’t want to repeat it. But I didn’t do anything I was morally ashamed of.
Alcohol lowers inhibitions–but it *does not* force anyone to do anything they find ethically repugnant. Drinking does not turn anyone into a rapist.
duh swami says
I quit drinking when I realized I was paying good money to get dizzy and nauseated…
Peggy says
He was probably raping female members of his family and they couldn’t even report him.
Lynne says
He did it out of boredom because he probably isn’t working or going to school. Or he’s just a Muslim doing what they do best which is raping, stealing etc.
Salome says
Recently there was a spate of attacks on women using a short cut through a park not all that far from me. The police officer leading the investigation got into all manner of trouble for suggesting that it wasn’t a good idea for women to be taking the shortcut alone with the attacker on the loose. It was, perhaps, badly expressed, but what he means was, ‘There’s a dangerous person out there and we haven’t caught him yet. I advise you not to put yourselves at risk until we’ve got him and it’s safe to walk through the park again.’ Even before the Muslim invasion it was always a bad idea (not criminally or morally culpable, just a bad idea) for a woman or anyone to go out on a night on the town and get so drunk, or high, or whatever, as not to be able to take reasonable precautions or even have a clear recollection of events. There are always bad people out there who take advantage of the obviously vulnerable. The judge wasn’t blaming the woman, he wasn’t saying anything my parents wouldn’t have said to me if I’d got myself in the same predicament–and I wouldn’t be surprised if he gives his daughters similar advice, if he has any. And he didn’t excuse the perp. You may not like the perp’s sentence, but that’s just the British sentencing regime. Since when did it become a cause of outrage simply to remind people, especially young women, that they shouldn’t deliberately place themselves at risk? We read JW because we’re reasonable people–can’t you separate the problem–the importation into European society of a hostile demographic–from good old fashioned advice as to how to conduct oneself so as to miminise risk?
Pong says
Rightly so. We seem to look at the women as a victim regardless of circumstances. Sexual “freedom”, given to the women by society is destructive to that society. Welfare benefits to single mothers destroy the family. The number of women with psychological problems have increased dramatically in the last 40 years. Parents delegated their responsibilities to the state.
Salome says
She is the victim in this case. I suppose I reason more from a view of contributory negligence–what would an insurer say? For example, you get in a car knowing the driver is off his face, you are still a victim when he inevitably crashes, but you mightn’t get the full insurance payout.
gravenimage says
Pong wrote:
Sexual “freedom”, given to the women by society is destructive to that society…
……………………………..
Make her wear a Burqa and subject her to FGM and a forced marriage at the age of nine. That’ll keep those b*tches in line, right?
Peggy says
Wrong, she’ll still provoke a rape and be stoned for adultery.
Woman are just so wicked.
Peggy says
“Did I deserve to be raped because I was working hard to pay for my education? Is this, in your mind, “a waste of morals”?
==========================
We do not need to justify our movements.
Purushottam Deshmukh says
Mr Pong,
You’ve made a very correct observation. The West is just the waste of morals. I can’t imagine a woman moving alone at midnight in dangerous areas of metros. The remarks made by the British Judge bear practical value. He is not a stalwart of any cult or sect. One should know he has not spared the culprits.
gravenimage says
Purushottam Deshmukh wrote:
Mr Pong,
You’ve made a very correct observation. The West is just the waste of morals. I can’t imagine a woman moving alone at midnight in dangerous areas of metros.
…………………………..
When I was at university I worked a series of jobs around my classes, either in the early hours of the morning or the late shift, and often came home after midnight.
Did I deserve to be raped because I was working hard to pay for my education? Is this, in your mind, “a waste of morals”?
R. Louis Engelbrecht says
The case of the drunk assulted women too me is very simple
One evil does not justify another evil
One evil does not excuse another evil
gravenimage says
Being drunk is deeply unwise.
But is a woman drinking too much an evil in the same way as sexual assault is? False moral equivalence.
Salome says
And, might I add, there is a culture in Britain, Australia and other places, of young people going out for the purpose of getting themselves plastered. This was never a good idea and always made them vulnerable. And it certainly isn’t a way of dealing with the Muslim invasion–which will find things so much easier when the defenders are too off their heads to be able to put up any resistance.
Islam the religion of killers says
” She got very, very drunk. It doesn’t excuse what happened, ”
Is it excusable to get very drunk, or just drunk ?? …
In our society, being able to have a “few too many” is like freedom of speech ..
Purushottam Deshmukh says
Dear Mr Islam The Religion Of Killers,
What’s the name of your society? “FEW TOO MANY”? Is this your personal identity and ideology? Your comment is far from convincing.
gravenimage says
Does this poster actually have a problem with this Muslim trying to rape this woman? Not so you’d notice…
And the implication that Muslims only victimize the substance-impaired is utterly false, in any case.
Voytek Gagalka says
New “justice” in the Land of Magna Charta. It must be high of foolishness to install such “judges” in UK nowadays. More to come if planted sharia tree will be come to the full fruition in the Garden of Britain.
Salome says
I think you’ve misunderstood what the judge said. What’s not excused is not the getting drunk, but the attack on the woman who was drunk. Whatever condition she was in, it didn’t excuse her attacker. And yes, as long as she doesn’t cause harm by ‘having a few too many’, it’s her right, but prudence would dictate that you don’t get plastered in public–drink as much as you like in the safety of home (where the booze is cheaper). Nobody’s saying she’s a bad person. I’m just trying to say that people who counsel prudence aren’t bad people either.
Purushottam Deshmukh says
Very well said.
Oliver says
You are correct- and the judge did (perhaps too lightly-perhaps the guidelines- I-nor do most if not all of the people posting who criticized the judge know- what (if any) guidelines there are for various crimes.
he did order the attacker to jail; and be deported.
And, was she raped, or assaulted? (IE-rape, as I understand it-is actual sexual penetration-)-did that happen. I did not see a clear indication when I read this.
Not saying that the Muslim piece of garbage is worth anything.
Buy question-KUWAIT IS A WEALTHY COUNTRY; NO WAR THERE; WHY IS HE A REFUGEE FROM KUWAIT?
gravenimage says
A passer-by came to the victim’s aid while the attacker lay on top of her. I think it is clear that he intended to rape her, but did not have the chance.
John Marks says
He didn’t excuse the attacker, he merely gave some sage advice, “Don’t be stupid.”
Salome says
Exactly. Do you lock up your house? Of course. Why? Because of burglars. That doesn’t excuse a burglar taking advantage of an unlocked door or an open window. Do we wish that we could leave our doors unlocked and our windows open? Of course we do. It’s about taking reasonable precautions for your safety–whether the dangers arise from Muslims or entitled frat boys.
Oliver says
Aren’t there taxis in Britain. That is a question
If there are
This woman must be a total idiot
She gets drunk. Goes to an apartment of a person or people she doesn’t know
In an area she is unfamiliar with. Walks on a park. Alone. In darkness.
She is in my view beyond dumb
Just my view.
Anne Smith says
Unfortunatel,y in some parts of Britain, taxis are part of the problem. TheMuslim taxi drivers used in the Rotherham rapes were all complicit with their co-religionists in the grooming gangs.
Quite a number of Muslim taxi drivers have been found guilty of assaulting single female passengers, especially when they are drunk or getting a ride home late at night.
In some areas all the taxis are driven by Muslims.
Oliver says
Ms
Smith. I was unaware of that. Re. Taxis.
Yes. The Muslims are a large or actually huge problem. But. People should be prudent and take care of themselves
gravenimage says
True, Anne. In San Francisco, over half the cabs are driven by Muslims–here in the East Bay, the number is closer to 90%. I’m careful about getting into taxis driven by Muslims, and could not imagine doing it after a night of drinking. Women–impaired or otherwise–have been raped by Muslims. I’ve had some Muslim drivers say some very threatening and disturbing things to me.
gravenimage says
She gets drunk. Goes to an apartment of a person or people she doesn’t know
………………….
No she didn’t. She was attacked in the street. Her drinking too much was not smart, but making up things against the victim is just appalling.
Oliver says
Graven– she went to the apartment of a person (or persons) that she did not know.
I doubt- strongly- that it was to play chess.
Then she left- and was attacked-in a park.
But little recollection of -it seems everything.
I think that she is kind of dumb. Not excusing the Muslim’s behavior, and I don’t see where the judge did either.
As I posted before- are there guidelines? If so, did the judge follow them? In my view ( and I used to know a few criminal defense attorneys in FL) guidelines are terrible- for both sides- as the judge (and/or jury if a jury trial) often has little discretion.
gravenimage says
UK judge says woman sexually assaulted by Muslim migrant was “foolish” for drinking too much
“Sentencing Alanezy, Mr Justice Gilbart said there was no excuse for the attack but people had to take responsibility for their safety when on nights out.”
…………………………..,
Just sickening. A judge is supposed to sentence the criminal, not lecture the victim.
Another point–while it is of course foolish to drink too much, as this young lady did, this is *hardly* the only circumstances under which Mohammedans victimize Infidels.
Some of the women had had something to drink on New Year’s Eve last year during the mass sexual assaults in Europe–but many had not.
What about all the little children Muslims have assaulted–are we supposed to believe that six-year-olds at swimming pools are drunk?
The fact is that Muslims rape any Infidels–Yezidi girls plucked from their homes in the Islamic State, Christian school girls kidnapped from their classrooms in Nigeria, and an elderly nun in her cloister in India.
None of these had been drinking. It did not save them from being raped by ravening Muslims, though.
Oliver says
Your other points- reasonable- but irrelevant to the post.
This was about ONE CASE, AND ONLY ONE CASE.
And, I think the judge was correct to lecture the woman- she obviously seems (or seemed ) to show little common sense. Just my views.
Creole Gumbo says
This is precisely why ALL Muslims should be kept out of the US. Once they have sufficient numbers to out vote you they can change the rules to do whatever they please and you are the one who will be jailed, if you are lucky enough not to be tortured and killed.
Edouardo Dundas says
With the new U.S. president, this overreaching tide of rabid religious and lawless gangs will be pushed back and stalled until (hopefully) the more rational heads in this flood come to their senses, look around, see what they are doing and turn against the despotic fascists and religious leaders egging them into their battle of attrition…
And, SHAME on the Western countries for over a dozen years of leadership in tearing down the walls of other countries that held this insanity at bay – SHAME on the US for overthrowing the restraining forces in the name of Humanity, starting with Carter – Shame on countries such as France for granting safe haven to those expelled for being too radical to live in their own country, such as the ayatollah, and SHAME on the Nobel committee for foolishly rewarding speech without gauging actions – such as reactionary heads of the PLO and US.
Their time is over, and the only remnants will be writ in history. Hopefully, not in Farsi or Arabic.
mortimer says
Justice Gilbart’s comment would have caused a devastating FURY if he had said it about a woman raped by a British man!!!
Gilbart’s mistakes: 1) he BLAMED THE VICTIM 2) he established Sharia rape law in UK.
mortimer says
In effect, Justice Gilbart admitted tacitly that Muslims are different in their mentality and more dangerous to British women than British men.
Mirren10 says
No, he didn’t.
”Sentencing Alanezy, Mr Justice Gilbart said there was no excuse for the attack but people had to take responsibility for their safety when on nights out.”
Graven makes some excellent points, and I agree with her, but I also agree with Salome and the Judge. Even if there were *no* muslims in the UK, her behaviour was idiotic, and could have easily led to a *non-muslim* predator attacking her.
gravenimage says
Dear Mirren, I am *not* defending drinking to excess–I have seen the results, and am no fan. Save for a few sips of champagne on New Year’s Eve, I rarely drink at all.
But I think this judge’s words muddy the waters. Muslims are hardly just targeting those who are substance-impaired. Just look at all the rapes of young children.
But it is true that Muslims especially go after those who are vulnerable–the elderly, the very young, and anyone foolish enough to make themselves artificially weak.
billybob says
I see above people are ready to tar and feather the judge, but if you read what he said in the full context, he said nothing wrong whatsoever…
“I’m sure it was a frightening incident. She got very, very drunk. It doesn’t excuse what happened, but people have to make sure they protect themselves and guard against this – she made herself very vulnerable.
“The law seeks to protect victims such as this from their own foolishness.
“(The complainant) had got herself drunk, was in a public place, unable to protect herself and the law must be seen to protect vulnerable people from being picked on by those who spot their vulnerability and choose to attack them.”
What he said above demonstrated empathy: “I’m sure it was a frightening incident”. He demonstrated he was absolutely on the side of the law: “The law seeks to protect victims such as this from their own foolishness.”
Furthermore, you really had to be there to know his tone of voice. He could have been speaking like a father to his daughter. It certainly is foolish for a young woman to get stupid drunk in public. It is stupid for anyone!
HCHARRY says
NO OTHER “BLOKES” TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE FACT THAT SHE WAS DRUNK IN A PUB. FANCY THAT.