• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK: Muslim sexually assaults two women, physically assaults a third

Dec 27, 2016 10:29 am By Robert Spencer

Once again (it cannot be emphasized enough, since British and all Western authorities remain in total denial about it): it’s all based on the Qur’an. As for the rape, the Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.

“Man charged following string of Boxing Day assaults in Toxteth,” by Alan Weston, Liverpool Echo, December 27, 2016 (thanks to Ian):

A man was charged following a string of assaults on women in Toxteth on Boxing Day.

Officers were called at around 7am to a report that a woman had been sexually assaulted and a second woman physically assaulted by a man on Sefton Park Road .

A third woman reported she had been sexually assaulted at around 6.40am on Brompton Avenue.

Following a search of the area, a 25-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of two sexual assaults and one assault….

Police today confirmed a man had been charged with attempted rape, sexual assault and assault following incidents on Sefton Park Road and Brompton Avenue on December 26.

Nuradine Jafar, 25, of Selbourne Street, Toxteth was remanded in custody and will appear at South Sefton Magistrates Court on Wednesday, December 28.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, United Kingdom, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Toxteth


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Mirren10 says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 10:33 am

    Not to worry, Robert, dear old Sharia May is keeping us safe, by not letting you or Pamela Geller in. sarc/off.

    • A Harris USA says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 3:57 pm

      How sad for these British ladies!! No mention of their age, here is the facts, it is not just young pretty women, and those in bikinis. Women who are up in years are targets as well.. Seems like the brave English Knights of old are long dead.. How sick that British men, allow this to continue this to happen to all their women.. Mothers, daughters, wives, sisters, it is just to sick to understand.. The land of “I want to hold your hand”, is now the land of rape, assault, and brutal attacks on innocent women.. NO visit to UK for me!!

  2. quota raven says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 10:36 am

    6:40 and 7:00 am? Relax everybody. He musta just waked up with a stiffy. Perfectly legit and understandable; it was a sexual emergency. (sarc off)

    Cheers!

    quota raven.

  3. Michael Copeland says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 11:06 am

    “Their women are yours to take, legitimately. Allah made them yours.”
    Sheikh Saad al Beraik

  4. Vyx says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 11:31 am

    I’m sure that the magistrate will explain it was just a cultural misunderstanding, and then remind women that they should dress modestly, and for their safety, not go out alone. Nothing will be done, except perhaps the blaming of the victims.

  5. ECAW says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 1:08 pm

    Can someone enlighten me here?

    The above verses say it’s ok to own female slaves who can be used for sex.

    One of the verses talks about female slaves captured in war. Presumably they would be infidel women since Mohammed was only fighting infidels in his Medina time. But none of them explicitly say that only infidel women can be taken as slaves.

    On the other hand 4:25 says “And whoso is not able to afford to marry free, believing women, let them marry from the believing maids whom your right hands possess…” so it is allowable to have Muslim female slaves.

    It seems to me therefore that the blanket claim “the Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use” is not supported by the text.

    • Angemon says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 3:24 pm

      “ so it is allowable to have Muslim female slaves.”

      Converts, perhaps. But that is in regard to marriage, not using them for sex alone..

      • ECAW says

        Dec 27, 2016 at 3:44 pm

        Angemon – I believe this doesn’t meet my objection.

        “the believing maids whom your right hands possess” means that they were slaves before the question of marriage came up. and whether they were converts or not is irrelevant (since even if they were converts they were not freed). The fact is that 4:25 refers to Muslim slaves (and there is no reason to believe that they would be excused the full duties of “those your right hand posseses”) therefore Robert Spencer’s statement “the Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use” does not stand. It might as well read “the Qur’an teaches that women can be lawfully taken for sexual use”

        • Achmed says

          Dec 27, 2016 at 11:18 pm

          There exists a constant state of war between the mohammedans and the nonbelievers. Therefore, any nonmohammedan female found, is something that may be “taken” and become “of the right hand”.

          Therefore, the koran approves of and, in actuality, commands that the believer (mohammedan) rape nonmohammedans.

          What are you sunni or shiite?

        • ECAW says

          Dec 28, 2016 at 3:13 am

          Achmed – I accept that there is a global jihad going on with support from an unknown proportion of Muslims but it is untrue to say there is a constant state of war between Muslims and non-Muslims. Truer to say that there is currently a one-sided war involving some Muslims and no non-Muslims.

          But to return to the point, were you surprised at 4:25 as I was? If you think 4:24 sanctions rape of non-Muslim women today why does 4:25 not do the same for Muslim women?

          As to whether I am Sunni or Shiite, click on my name and figure it out.

        • Angemon says

          Dec 30, 2016 at 10:12 am

          Hi ECAW, and sorry for the time it took me to respond. You wrote:

          ““the believing maids whom your right hands possess” means that they were slaves before the question of marriage came up.”

          Yes, it means that. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they were captured as muslims, just that to marry a slave girl she’d have to convert to islam.

          “The fact is that 4:25 refers to Muslim slaves (and there is no reason to believe that they would be excused the full duties of “those your right hand posseses”) therefore Robert Spencer’s statement “the Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use” does not stand.”

          Islamic law states that slaves are rewards from a war between muslims and infidels, with wars being historically the most common way to acquire slaves. While it’s true that a muslim man could very well get his hands on a muslim (i.e., follower of his sect and therefore not a heretic or deviant) slave woman by buying/receiving her as a gift from someone else – islamic law advises, but nor mandates, muslim slave owners to free slaves who convert to islam – and that being muslim may not shield her from being used for sex, islamic law only allows the taking of slaves in war during a war with non-muslims. On that regard, infidel women can be taken for sexual use, but not muslim women.

        • ECAW says

          Dec 30, 2016 at 12:26 pm

          Thanks Angemon. On your first point:

          “Yes, it means that. It doesn’t necessarily mean that they were captured as muslims, just that to marry a slave girl she’d have to convert to islam.”

          I disagree. It is allowed in the Koran for a Muslim male to marry a female of the book. 2:221 says otherwise but it is abrogated by 5:5. See here:

          http://www.koran-at-a-glance.com/sura2.html

          On your second point, I think I accept what you and Achmed and Robert Spencer are saying or implying, that taking captive an infidel woman is allowable in war between Muslims and infidels. It just depends on whether Muslims believe themselves in that state or not. Jihadis would regard themselves at war with us, but the others? We don’t really know what Muslims really believe do we? I suspect that most rape gangs and the case of the alleged abductor who disposed of four babies can rationalise their actions with racial or religious contempt for infidels without necessarily declaring war in their minds.

        • Angemon says

          Dec 30, 2016 at 1:54 pm

          HI again, ECAW 🙂

          “ It is allowed in the Koran for a Muslim male to marry a female of the book. 2:221 says otherwise but it is abrogated by 5:5.”

          Surah 4 was revealed before surah 5:

          http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/chrono.htm

          but I’m not sure if 4:25 has been abrogated as well. I’d imagine so, since it was still exhorting against marrying with non-believers, in which case it would be one of those “made sense in context at the time but means nothing nowadays” verses. In any case, your point regarding 4:25 was the implied ability of muslim men to own muslim slave women, correct? Which they can, at least according to a fatwa in islamqa:

          https://islamqa.info/en/94840

          Shaykh al-Shanqeeti (may Allaah have mercy on him) said:

          If it is said: If the slave is a Muslim, how can he be kept as a slave if the reason for which people may be taken as slaves is if they are kaafirs who are waging war against Allaah and His Messenger? The answer is that the basic principle which is well known to the scholars and all wise people is that a right that is already established by shar’i means cannot be superceded by rights that are established later on.

          When the Muslims take prisoners of war, they are given the right to enslave them by the law of the Creator of all, and He is the All-Wise, All-Aware. If this right is established, then the slave becomes a Muslim after that, his right to be freed from slavery because of his Islam is superceded by the right of the mujaahid whose right to enslave him took effect before he was a Muslim. It is not just or fair to waive the former right because of a latter right, as is well known to all wise people.

          Yes, it is good for the owner to set him free if he becomes Muslim, and Islam enjoins that and encourages it, and opens the door to doing so in many ways – he is referring to the fact that Allaah has decreed that when expiation takes the form of freeing a slave, the slave in question should be a Muslim

          “ It just depends on whether Muslims believe themselves in that state or not. Jihadis would regard themselves at war with us, but the others? We don’t really know what Muslims really believe do we? I suspect that most rape gangs and the case of the alleged abductor who disposed of four babies can rationalise their actions with racial or religious contempt for infidels without necessarily declaring war in their minds.”

          I agree with that. Other than them outright stating that they consider to be at war with anyone who is not a muslim and that taking slaves from among non-muslims and raping them is part of islam (like ISIS members said to Yazidi girls), we can’t tell what’s going in their minds. What we’re left with in that scenario are people raised in a religion/culture that devalues outsiders and assumes women from outside their culture/religion to be whores engaging in sex exploitation of women from outside their culture/religion. While they may not be going through the motions or by the numbers of orthodox islamic teachings, their behaviour is the result of a culture/religion whose tenets state that infidel women can be taken as slaves and used as they see fit.

          I hope I’m addressing your points and not just talking past you >_>

        • ECAW says

          Dec 31, 2016 at 6:54 am

          Angemon – I think we are agreed that the Koranic position is that infidel women could be taken as slaves in war and that Muslim women could be owned as slaves for other reasons therefore Robert Spencer’s point about the verses sanctioning the capture and rape of infidel women today relies on there being a state of war existing between Muslims and non-Muslims. In practice that only requires a Muslim to claim there is a war, which is not a stretch for any self-respecting follower of the example of the perfect man.

          I sometimes find my own and others’ dogged interest in the Koran (sura diving as my wife calls it) a bit curious considering it was very possibly fictional as was Mo (that’s what RS thinks anyway). Nevertheless I feelc ompelled to try and turn over every stone. I don’t have any intrinsic interest in it – I think it the biggest pile of garbage going – but I find it interesting in the same way as trying to work out puzzles.

          Anyway, enough of that for the moment. Happy new year tommorrow. Let’s hope the log jam continues to break up in 2017, and I hope you (and anyone else) find this from a Special Needs school in N. Ireland as inspiring as I did:

  6. Silas Praygood says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 1:30 pm

    Mr. Spencer,

    Again I thank you for the education. Wow, can’t for the life of me believe educated human beings follow the teaching of the ‘quran’ and that its ancient bombastic teachings are acted out? Can’t wait to get your novel on this stupid book.

  7. Tetvet1968 says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 5:35 pm

    This will all change on 1/20/2017. Once the western world democracies have strong western leadership this kind shit will cease. I was told by a high ranking Ba’athist’s party member in Iraq that they want American leadership but they know they need a Saddam type leader. One that understands tribal and religious feuds and knows how to quell the sectarian violence. We all know Trump doesn’t have that expertise but he pulling together a crew of “stand on the wall” type people that do understand the delivery of ultraviolence without restrictions. When Trump shows his hand and throws out/deports few thousands Muslims and makes a deal with Putin to destroy ISIS, Al Qaeda and the Iranian nuclear capabilities the entire world will calm down. Nobody will take shit from Islam once America stands it’s ground.

  8. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 6:43 pm

    mr spencer, all these verses are not justifying rape.rape is punishable with death under sharia law,whether with muslim or non-muslim woman.the verses are talking about sex with war captive concubine.your evil mithraist bible says kill all,including children and women with exception of girls who did not know men whom you can keep as sex slaves .see samuel.the church men kept sex slaves captured during crusade wars and castrated captured male slaves for hardlabor as history accurately recorded.you may say christians later abolished slavery.did they erase those biblical verses that justify slavery and having sex with female slaves?.they are still boldly contained in the bible. mr spencer did any one of those muslims you said rape filthy christian ladies in the west tell you that he is justified by virture of those verses you cited?are you saying whatever a muslim does must be in accodance with the quran?you mean a muslim will never commit a sin as prohibited in the quran?then what is the essence of seeking forgiveness from allah if a muslim will never commit sin?what about temptation from the satan mention in the quran?are you saying a muslim cannot be tempted by the satan? mr spencer, you alway report that a muslims rape this and that.are you saying filthy christians do not rape?what about those ladies who complained that devil trump sexually assaulted them?you dont want talk about that because you are biased against muslims whom you hate too much.

    • Achmed says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 11:21 pm

      Chapter and verse. Spencer gives chapter and verse of that vile satanic tome (koran). Please, furnish chapter and verse of the Holy Bible … oh ye, of the vilest of all creatures.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 12:03 am

      Horrifying apologist for Muslim savagery ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:

      mr (sic) spencer, (sic) all these verses are not justifying rape.rape (sic) is punishable with death under sharia law,whether with muslim (sic) or non-muslim (sic) woman.the (sic) verses are talking about sex with war captive concubine.
      ……………………………

      How appalling that muhammed affirms that his foul coreligionists are allowed to rape women they have kidnapped and enslaved. *Ugh*.

      “Islamic cleric decrees it OK for Syrian rebels to rape women”

      http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/3/islamic-cleric-decrees-it-ok-syrian-rebels-rape-wo/

      Muslims consider Infidel women in the West fair game in just the same way.

      The “Prophet” himself raped women in Jihad, as muhammed well knows.

      If he really believed that there was a problem with this, he would be taking it up with his rapist fellow Muslims, not with the civilized Infidels here at Jihad Watch.

      More:

      your (sic) evil mithraist (sic) bible (sic) says kill all,including children and women with exception of girls who did not know men whom you can keep as sex slaves .see samuel.the (sic) church men kept sex slaves captured during crusade wars and castrated captured male slaves for hardlabor (sic) as history accurately recorded.you may say christians (sic) later abolished slavery.did (sic) they erase those biblical verses that justify slavery and having sex with female slaves?.they (sic) are still boldly contained in the bible.
      ……………………………

      muhammed *finally* acknowledged–after much prodding from myself and other posters here at Jihad Watch–that it was the Christian West that abolished slavery. (I will not address his claptrap about the Crusades here). And of course Christians did not alter the Bible–that’s the sort of thing that Muslims do. The Bible is a historical document, among other things.

      The fact is that many Abolitionists cited the Bible as a reason to *end* slavery, and many Abolitionists were themselves devout Christians–including William Wilberforce and the Quakers and Methodists who ran the Underground Railroad.

      But the main point is that Christians and other civilized Infidels have *ended* slavery–Muslims never have.

      More:

      mr (sic) spencer (sic) did any one of those muslims (sic) you said rape filthy christian (sic) ladies in the west tell you that he is justified by virture (sic) of those verses you cited?are (sic) you saying whatever a muslim (sic) does must be in accodance (sic) with the quran?you (sic) mean a muslim (sic) will never commit a sin as prohibited in the quran (sic)?
      ……………………………

      First note that this vicious Mohammedan is *sneering* at the victims of Muslim rape–how appalling.

      As to the rest, of course Muslims at times fail to act in accordance with the Qur’an–sometimes they take a drink, or eat a pulled-pork sandwich, or fail to take sex slaves, or actually show kindness to an Infidel.

      But the implication that Muslims raping Infidel women in Jihad is a sin in Islam could not be further from the truth. The “Prophet” himself not only raped Infidel women himself, he even castigated his “Companions” for failing to rape their captives.

      Notice that muhammed never quite gets around to condemning his coreligionist for raping the “filthy Infidels” here?

      More:

      then (sic) what is the essence of seeking forgiveness from allah (sic) if a muslim (sic) will never commit sin?what (sic) about temptation from the satan (sic) mention in the quran?are (sic) you saying a muslim (sic) cannot be tempted by the satan? (sic)
      ……………………………

      Of course Muslims can sin–as their vile creed sees it, any time a Muslim acts like a decent human being, treating a woman or an Infidel as an equal, he is “sinning”.

      More:

      mr spencer, (sic) you alway (sic) report that a muslims (sic) rape this and that.
      ……………………………

      No–this was not Robert Spencer reporting this. This was the Liverpool Echo. All of the reports of Muslims raping victims come from reputable media sources.

      And look how dismissive muhammed is about this serious crime, saying “a muslims rape this and that”–*Ugh*.

      More:

      are (sic) you saying filthy christians (sic) do not rape?what (sic) about those ladies who complained that devil trump (sic) sexually assaulted them?you (sic) dont (sic) want talk about that because you are biased against muslims (sic) whom you hate too much.
      ……………………………

      Of course Christians are capable of rape–but it is a rare crime, because rape is against both Christianity and the civilized secular laws of the West.

      Would that this were true of Islam, where rape is not just condoned, but *sacralized*.

      Rape is a *crime* in the West–not so under Islam is the victims are Kuffar. Civilized Westerners condemn rape, and prosecute the crime of rape.

      As for Donald Trump, there is no proof of his having sexually assaulted anyone. If he did engage in improprieties, I and everyone else here condemns it.

      There is an epidemic of Muslim rape of Infidel women–the idea that decrying this is a sign of Robert Spencer “hate too much” is simply grotesque.

    • trish says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 3:22 am

      Ibby, I think you really need to find another site to vent your vile Islamic hatred upon. You are embarrassingly out of your depth here and a laughing stock. People like Graven Image and others take pity on you and make a few point by point rebuttals of your bilge, but really there is no real point in seriously addressing any of the points you so long to make about ‘filthy’ Christianity. You lack any historical knowledge, have no knowledge of Christianity or Christian texts but mouth the cheap and nasty claptrap of your local imam.
      Most people on this site have probably read your Koran and Hadiths etc and are way more knowledgeable about Islam than you.. Filthy indeed.

      • Anne Smith says

        Dec 28, 2016 at 11:35 am

        He probably is the local imam

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 29, 2016 at 5:45 pm

        Thank you, Trish.

    • Myles says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 6:30 am

      Ibrahim stop drinking your camel’s piss and spouting gibberish from the koran. Better yet, continue drinking your camel piss. It’s highly likely you’ll end up in an asylum, where you’ll be sedated and properly ignored.

    • mark says

      Dec 29, 2016 at 5:31 am

      filthy satan and paedophile whoreshipping muslim

  9. gravenimage says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 9:19 pm

    UK: Muslim sexually assaults two women, physically assaults a third
    ……………………

    These poor women. The sexual Jihad proceeds apace…

    • Anne Smith says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 11:40 am

      The tragedy is that women in Britain are legally prevented from carrying any form of really effective deterrent or self protection, such as pepper spray, or Mace, or even a taser.

      I suppose a small water pistol filled with ammonia might be effective, it is a very old form of ammunition but ammonia is still obtainable.

      In Britain the police are far more interested in protecting the aggressor, it is almost forbidden to defend one’s home from burglars. The Police are extremely anxious to protect their own jobs and do not want anyone else standing up against attackers. It is quite common for householders to be arrested for knocking a burglar down or bashing him, you are only allowed to use the minimum force!!

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 29, 2016 at 5:47 pm

        Yes–women and other Infidels need to be able to protect themselves. Even more to the point, they are always at risk as long as violent Muslims continue to flood into Britain and the rest of the West.

  10. Tetvet1968 says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 8:17 am

    All this talk about Koran and the meaning of each Haditha and every Bible verse, is for the theologians for interpretation. We the warriors of God don’t care about the fine print once Trump is in office it’s a call to arms. There are thousands and thousands of armed men and women that want to take the war to Islam, on American streets with no rule of engagement. This will show free people all over the world that well-armed people will not be tolerating the Muslim invasion and the savage assault on our women. Come try that on my family of girls they will leave you bleeding and dead waiting for the coroner to drag their goat screwing asses off to the morgue. Please American dads train your girls in the use of fire arms it’s never too young and get them CCW’s.

  11. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 12:08 pm

    gravenimage,are you saying christian activists abolished biblical injunctions to keep sex slave girls and left the slavery verses as historical records?if you are not satisfied with your evil mithraist bible,why not throw it away or ban it from circulation in the so-called civilised christian west for causing you embarrassments?what about deuteronomy 22:13-18;did christians in the west stop relying on it for parents to dip their fingers into daughters’vaginas for her brother to have sex with her to taste if it like wine so that they will have indiscriminate sex like beasts as it is the practice in the west? we ,muslims, never select verses to believe and practice,rejecting others.allah told us to believe and practice all,unlike christian abolishinists.in islam ,it tantamount to rejection of all.,which is disbelief.christians want us to do as they do before they accept us.to hell with your stupidity.

    • ECAW says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 12:31 pm

      Ibrahim – I notice that you say Allah tells Muslims to believe all the verses of the Koran. Just wondering, how do you cope with the many contradictory verses?

      For instance, Allah says in 96:2 that he created man out of a clot of congealed blood. Elsewhere he says that he created man from water (25:54), clay (15:26) dust (30:20) and nothing at all (3:47).

      To my mind those are mutually exclusive. Which do you believe?

  12. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 12:26 pm

    gravenimage,are you saying christian activists abolished biblical injunctions to keep sex slave girls and left the slavery verses as historical records?if you are not satisfied with your evil mithraist bible,why not throw it away or ban it from circulation in the so-called civilised christian west for causing you embarrassments?what about deuteronomy 22:13-18;did christians in the west stop relying on it for parents to dip their fingers into daughters’vaginas for her brother to have sex with her to taste if it like wine so that they will have indiscriminate sex like beasts as it is the practice in the west? we ,muslims, never select verses to believe and practice,rejecting others.allah told us to believe and practice all,unlike christian abolishinists.in islam ,it tantamount to rejection of all.,which is disbelief.christians want us to do as they do before they accept us.to hell with your stupidity. gravenimage, you lied to say our noble prophet muhammad raped women for having a slave among his wives.did father abraham committed rape for having a slave(hagar)as his wife?

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 29, 2016 at 6:50 pm

      Foul apologist for rape ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:

      gravenimage,are (sic) you saying christian (sic) activists abolished biblical (sic) injunctions to keep sex slave girls and left the slavery verses as historical records?if (sic) you are not satisfied with your evil mithraist (sic) bible,why (sic) not throw it away or ban it from circulation in the so-called civilised christian (sic) west for causing you embarrassments?
      ………………………………….

      muhammed’s reading comprehension really is shockingly poor. No–Christians do not need to “abolished biblical injunctions”, because they do not exist. This was always a reference to events that occurred in a specific time and place.

      And no; Christians are not embarrassed by the Bible.

      More:

      what (sic) about deuteronomy (sic) 22:13-18;did (sic) christians (sic) in the west stop relying on it for parents to dip their fingers into daughters’vaginas (sic) for her brother (sic) to have sex with her to taste if it like wine so that they will have indiscriminate sex like beasts as it is the practice in the west?
      ………………………………….

      It has already been pointed out to muhammed that this Biblical verse does not say what the illiterate muhammad appears to believe it does–it is about a father defending his daughter against the false charges made by an abusive husband.

      There is no reference to a father sexually abusing his daughter; there is no reference to incest between a brother and sister. The wine reference comes from a misreading from a completely different verse, where in the Song of Solomon romantic married love is compared to wine. There is no reference in either verse to women’s vaginas tasting like wine.

      More:

      we (sic),muslims, (sic) never select verses to believe and practice,rejecting (sic) others.allah (sic) told us to believe and practice all,unlike (sic) christian abolishinists.in (sic) islam (sic),it (sic) tantamount (sic) to rejection of all.,which (sic) is disbelief.christians (sic) want us to do as they do before they accept us.to (sic) hell with your stupidity.
      ………………………………….

      Well, yes–and that is why Muslims are raping, enslaving, and mass-slaughtering Infidels everywhere today–all on the basis of their vile “holy books” and the model of the vicious “Prophet”. muhammed just affirms this savagery.

      More:

      gravenimage, you lied to say our noble prophet muhammad(sic) raped women for having a slave among his wives.did (sic) father abraham
      (sic) committed rape for having a slave(hagar)as (sic) his wife?
      ………………………………….

      Unlike Muslims, Jews and Christians do not consider most of the figures in the Bible to be infallible, but rather to be capable of both greatness and error. Many of them made mistakes–including Abraham. His treatment of Hagar was not his finest moment, as most Jews and Christians acknowledge.

      As for the vicious “Prophet”, it was not just his “having a slave among his wives”. In fact, Muhammed *regularly* practiced rape.

      He raped his little child bride Aisha–no nine-year-old child is capable of consent.

      Muhammed refused to release Juwayriyya bint al-Harith, one of the captives from the skirmish with the Banu Mustaliq, even when her family provided ransom. She agreed to marry Muhammed only once it was clear that he was not going to release her from slavery. At best, this was coercion.

      He raped the concubine Rayhana bint Zayd, enslaved after the massacre of her tribe, the Banu Qurayza.

      He raped Maria al-Qibtiyya, a slave sent to him as a concubine as a “gift”.

      He raped poor Safiyya bint Huyeiy in his tent the very night following his slaughter of her father, brothers, and husband.

      And here are several Hadith, with Muhammed’s views on the rape of women captured in Jihad:

      The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)

      “O Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?” The Prophet said, “Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.” (Bukhari 34:432)

      “We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter” (Sahih Muslim 3371)

      All of this is astonishingly disturbing.

      And Muhammed himself took a fifth of “booty” taken in Jihad–and this included captured women. Here he is, using his status as warlord to select the women he wanted to rape:

      I drove them along until I brought them to Abu Bakr who bestowed that girl upon me as a prize. So we arrived in Medina. I had not yet disrobed her when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) met me in the street and said: “Give me that girl.” (Sahih Muslim 4345)

      Really, there are few things more amply chronicled in Islam than that the “Prophet” was a rapist, and that he urged all pious Muslims to rape, as well.

      muhammed himself here has affirmed that Muslims can rape women taken as captives. *Ugh*.

  13. D Trump says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 12:57 pm

    They ( jihadis ) can quote the Koran all they want. The quotes they speak just happen to justify their crimes, imagine that.

    It’s not my job to educate these low life’s about our culture. If they don’t accept our laws then they deserve what they get.

    You Brits might want to consider taking matters into your own hands and give them a taste of how it really works.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.