• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

“You may not be in a religious war with me, but I’m in a religious war with you”

Dec 27, 2016 5:45 pm By Andrew Harrod

“You may not be in a religious war with me, but I’m in a religious war with you,” recalled former CIA interrogator James Mitchell the views of al-Qaeda (AQ) mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammad (KSM). Interviewed on December 6 at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) before an audience of about 70, Mitchell provided chilling, essential insight into the jihadist worldview currently threatening the globe.

AEI Resident Fellow Marc A. Thiessen introduced Mitchell as someone who “has spent thousands of hours with Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and other senior al-Qaeda operatives” and “looked directly into the face of evil.” Mitchell concurred that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, considered the leading technical genius behind AQ’s devastating September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, was “devil and diva,” whom Mitchell and other interrogators called “muq” after the Arabic word for brain, muqtar. Comparing him to a Star Wars “Jedi master” recruiting jihadist “Jedi warriors,” Mitchell found him “immensely charming. He reminded me of Yoda,” yet “that is often how evil looks.”

Mitchell recalled that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad “thought he was a Sufi” and “likes to sit there and talk…to tell you about his religion,” yet he appeared to Mitchell as no mere blusterer. Mitchell compared his AEI audience to Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, stating “I haven’t seen this much raw brain power in one place since the last time I sat in his cell with just him.” He “is probably the brightest person I have ever seen in my life, and I have seen some pretty bright people.”

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad’s evil genius came to life in Mitchell’s recounting of his description of his 2002 murder of Daniel Pearl, a Wall Street Journal reporter and jihadist hostage in Pakistan. He remembered that he “had sharp knives. The toughest part was getting through the neck bone.”  or him, this killing showed God’s “glory, shows how much his influence is. It’s almost like an act of worship to him.”

While “not attacking all of Islam,” Mitchell saw in Khalid Sheikh Mohammad how “these Islamists, who want to destroy our way of life, have a set of beliefs that make them incredibly dangerous.” For Islamists, “how we’re supposed to live was established 1,400 years ago in the Koran and in the perfect words and deeds” of Islam’s prophet Muhammad. Khalid Sheikh Mohammad considered Islam a “religion of peace. The world will be at peace when sharia law is imposed on the whole world.”

Speaking of jihadists like Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, Mitchell emphasized the “depth of their belief. I don’t think most Americans understand that they, no kidding, believe what they believe.” Jihadists “really do believe they’re going to end up with 72 spiritual beings that become virgins every time you have sex with them.” “It sounds ridiculous to me,” but “they really do believe they’re going to be treated like rock stars up there.”

Mitchell’s interrogations of another captured AQ jihadist, Abu Zubaydah, revealed that “Al Qaeda dreams of bringing down America with catastrophic attacks, but that’s not particularly practical.” For him, the “real way to bring down America was with low-tech, ‘lone-wolf’ attacks because the target is not our military capabilities. It’s not our buildings. It’s not our roads. It’s the minds of the Americans.” “We don’t have to defeat you. We only have to persist long enough for you to defeat yourself.”

Similarly, Mitchell noted that Khalid Sheikh Mohammad “got fascinated by the Beltway sniper” who killed numerous individuals outside of Washington, DC, in 2002; he “would spend hours to me talking about that” and its “economy of scale.” Accordingly, he fantasized about multiple “single martyrs, shahids, who would go into the American culture and pull off low-tech attacks…with enough of those low-tech attacks, like happened with the Beltway shooter, it would cripple America.” Thus he “bought a gas station in Pakistan so he could figure out how to build a bomb that they could slide down into the gas tanks at gas stations.”

Describing such subversion to Mitchell in 2004, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad proved to be “pretty good at predicting the future.” He believed that

Islamists, like himself, are going to migrate to the United States, immigrate to the United States, wrap themselves in our civil rights to protect themselves, live off our welfare system to feed themselves, spread their jihadi message, and then when the time is right rise up and overthrow us from within.

Jihadists like Abu Zubaydah explained to Mitchell how they intended to exploit the nature of free societies against them. Abu Zubaydah “told us that our civil liberties, our willingness to be tolerant of other people, our openness, those were all flaws that Allah had put into our character to ensure that Islamists could win.” Mitchell was “certain if I sat down and said, what do you think of all this obsessive political correctness, he would say, another flaw…it’s a cloaking device so they can operate in the open without being confronted.”

Mitchell’s particular concern with political correctness involved the condemnation he and other American officials received for their use of Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EITs) like waterboarding, often decried as torture. Like many captured jihadists, CIA interrogators “tried tea and respectful conversation” to elicit information from Khalid Sheikh Mohammad after his initial capture, yet “he rocked and prayed…quoted the Koran, and acted belligerently.” EITs for a few weeks served to break this resistance and make captured jihadists agree to a more cooperative relationship. Although a “horrific thing…when we did EITs, it was more like a surgical suite” involving monitors like doctors and psychologists; “anyone could stop the interrogations anytime.”

“I think the American public needs to have a debate about how they want to protect themselves,” Mitchell stated in reflection upon EIT controversies. Recalling how he won repeated official approval for EITs, he stated that “I waterboarded almost as many lawyers as I did terrorists,” including a Department of Justice assistant attorney general. Absent such reflected debate, “if this obsessive political correctness continues, we’re going to be standing on the moral high ground looking down into our smoking hole that used to be several blocks in Los Angeles.”

Cross-posted from the Religious Freedom Coalition

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Jihad doctrine Tagged With: Khalid Sheikh Mohammad


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Eur says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 5:59 pm

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vApBZlaePec

    • PRCS says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 6:10 pm

      Which would NOT defeat the ideology.

      • JIMJFOX says

        Dec 27, 2016 at 7:08 pm

        Just as Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn’t defeat Japan and the Code of Bushido, with Hirohito regarded as their God in human form?

        It’s just a matter of scale- and getting the Russians on board. Without Mecca, Medina and the hajj, I predict Islam will first explode in global outrage, then dissolve in its own excrement. The One thing Islam understands is overwhelming force. So let them have it. Let Islam know what
        REAL terror is. Pakistan would be first, to neutralise its nukes. India would be very interested.

        • Rolf Wittwer says

          Dec 27, 2016 at 8:55 pm

          Hard but true.
          Possibly only a time question.

        • f c king says

          Dec 28, 2016 at 3:58 am

          Russia damn sure doesn’t want any more kidnapping of school children who are then wired with bombs.
          The world is going to have to act against the global jihad, sooner or later.

        • PRCS says

          Dec 28, 2016 at 9:49 am

          f c k

          “The world is going to have to act against the global jihad”

          By whom and by what means are yet to be determined.

        • Angemon says

          Dec 28, 2016 at 11:32 am

          Better go on without the Russians. They have, like, less than half of the US population and a much larger number of muslim citizens, both in raw number and proportionally. Putin has stated that Russia was a protector of the islamic world, and recently said that he preferred not to get islam and terrorism together.

        • Love Miscellaneous says

          Dec 30, 2016 at 10:07 pm

          “Without Mecca.. Haj, Islam will explode..”. In principle that’s correct, but the ‘explosion’ will be preceded by war(s) and mayhem. We the non Muslims are caught between the devil and the deep sea.

      • Jon Lon says

        Dec 28, 2016 at 4:13 pm

        The goats ? surely panic when he walks into the barn

        • PRCS says

          Dec 28, 2016 at 11:21 pm

          Only four of them.

  2. PRCS says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 6:02 pm

    “You may not be in a religious war with me, but I’m in a religious war with you”

    And that is the issue.

    Their view vs our view.

    So, what’s the adult response?

    Deport ’em all? Kill ’em all? Put ’em on “special trains to special showers”? Nuke Mecca? We’re at war?

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 6:42 pm

      PRCS, with all respect, characterizing a robust defense against Jihad as putting Muslims on “special trains to special showers”–that is, that it is tantamount to *the Holocaust*–is just outrageous.

      • PRCS says

        Dec 27, 2016 at 8:00 pm

        A JW poster made that statement yesterday.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 27, 2016 at 8:32 pm

          Yes, PRCS–I forget who it was, but I replied to that creep then.

          Recognizing that Islam is at war with us *does not* make us genocidal.

        • PRCS says

          Dec 27, 2016 at 8:46 pm

          “Recognizing that Islam is at war with us *does not* make us genocidal.”

          Who said it did?

          My original question asked what the adult response should be.

        • PRCS says

          Dec 28, 2016 at 1:22 pm

          Yes, Herb, Islam–the ideology–is genocidal.

    • mortimer says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 6:55 pm

      Deprogram Muslims right out of Islam … only Western security agencies can deprogram Muslims. They must ALL create protocols to convince Muslims with facts and reasoning that the Koran is a flawed, false book, Mohammed a false or even non-existent prophet, Allah an invented, false god, and Islam is false religion and that they may reasonably leave Islam with confidence.

      • JIMJFOX says

        Dec 27, 2016 at 7:11 pm

        That’s been tried with jihadis in Europe- and declared a total waste of effort. Get real.

        • A Harris USA says

          Dec 28, 2016 at 3:42 pm

          JIMFOX, you are so right!! Deport, depose the idiots in political power who enable Islam, and it’s followers.. watch to see if Obama tries to close Gitmo.. Hence setting the 9-11 planer free, or in a US court that gives him a lawyer..Which we pay for.. Obama isn’t done yet………..Jan 20th is still weeks away……….THE most dangerous time for the USA, and Israel!!

      • RL Robison says

        Dec 28, 2016 at 4:06 pm

        During an anthropology class in college, I studied differing family structures around the world. I then tried to explain to my father why his mother’s sister is his “aunt” only because he had been taught to believe that she is his relative and that, in some societies every adult male and female is as much your parent (with the same rights and responsibilities) as the people you gave you biological life, Unremarkably, my attempts to explain differing family structures was as unsuccessful with my father as are government programs trying to de-radicalize the thinking of people like Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. Both efforts fail because it is almost impossible to break thru the life view that society pounds into a person’s head from birth to death. The flexibility required to even attempt to question your society’s life view is pretty much limited to either young minds still in development or to adult minds thru personal experience.

        • PRCS says

          Dec 28, 2016 at 11:23 pm

          Yes.

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 29, 2016 at 12:16 am

          Not all “differing structures” are morally equal, and the idea that these are just “constructs” which have no ethical basis is simply no the case.

          Sorry–Muslims wanting to oppress and murder us is *not* the same as the civilized West.

        • PRCS says

          Dec 29, 2016 at 1:43 am

          he didn’t say they were morally equal, rather the construct pounded into their heads, for most–from day 1.

          To them–it is.

          That’s what has to be countered.

          Soon.

    • JIMJFOX says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 7:09 pm

      What is your answer, then- oh fount of liberal wisdom?

      • PRCS says

        Dec 27, 2016 at 8:19 pm

        Retired military and quite conservative.

        Don’t make assumptions.

        But, to answer–not sure, but definitely not the childish nonsense I noted above.

        I’m sure you realize that Japan’s Code of Bushido was NOT a global ideology.

        And which country should eliminate Mecca and Medina?

    • JIMJFOX says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 7:13 pm

      “Their view vs our view”

      Their view- kill every kuffar
      Our view- “The future must not belong….”

      • PRCS says

        Dec 27, 2016 at 8:20 pm

        That’s Barry’s view.

    • Silas Praygood says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 7:26 pm

      PRCS

      Farrakhan will still be here crying white-lash, and saying ‘whites are racist!’ to nuder the left?

      Is it time for the Sicarii yet?

      Well at least there is JIHAD WATCH, Bombthrowers and Breitbart:)

    • CogitoErgoSum says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 8:33 pm

      If you want to know how to eliminate an undesirable religion, study the methods set forth in the Quran and apply them to the religion of Islam itself. Study those methods which Muslims find acceptable when it comes to wiping out other religions and apply those methods to the religion of Islam. Make it as difficult as possible for someone to be a Muslim and to practice Islam. Impose special taxes upon mosques and do not allow repairs to be made to existing mosques and especially outlaw the building of new mosques. As Muslims would use our system against us we should use their system against them. Just as other religions have withered away in countries now dominated by Islam, Islam should also be made to wither away in accordance with its own set of rules as applied against itself. As the decree by Pharaoh regarding the children of the Hebrews was turned against the Egyptians the decrees of Muhammad should be turned against those who call themselves Muslims

      . ……… At least that is what I would do if I had the power to do so. ….. and I would call it justice.

      • iMusalmaanmasala says

        Dec 28, 2016 at 11:49 am

        I cant say how much I like your post. You are absolutely right. The evil that is Islam should be made to wither away just ike they have made other religions and there should be different laws for them.
        Political correctness be damned. Its time to go for the jugular of this cult before they go for ours.
        ‘Enhanced Interrogation Techniques’ should be used on all these terrorists and if the do gooders among us protest THEY TOO SHOULD BE SJBJECTED TO THE SAME to find out why they support murderers who dont care for them and would kill them without thinking for the 72 nubile recyling virgins
        Would they support these vile and evil people IF ONE OF THEIR OWN MET A GORY END AT THE HANDS OF THIS CULT CALLED ISLAM

    • Steve Edward says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 9:47 pm

      All excellent suggestions.

  3. PRCS says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 6:05 pm

    Oh, and a special note to The Hesperado.

    I do know you still “visit” here.

    Will there be a part 5, Bunky?

  4. gravenimage says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 6:20 pm

    “You may not be in a religious war with me, but I’m in a religious war with you”
    ………………………..

    That sums it up…

    And I don’t believe I have seen Andrew Harrod contributing to Jihad Watch before. Welcome, sir!

    • Andrew E Harrod says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 7:17 pm

      I am a named contributor at Jihadwatch. You can check my articles list:

      https://www.jihadwatch.org/author/andrewharrod

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 27, 2016 at 8:39 pm

        Please accept my apologies, Mr. Harrod. I usually notice bylines–I am terribly embarrassed that I missed so many of yours–many of these were stories that I not only read, but also commented on.

        You have made great contributions to Jihad Watch, and I offer you a belated–much belated, I’m afraid–welcome.

  5. Glenn Wilson says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 6:43 pm

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/09/khalid-sheikh-mohammed-photos Time to make the Donuts.

  6. mortimer says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 6:56 pm

    France has started to deprogram jihadists. All Muslims should be deprogrammed from this version of the Stockholm syndrome.

    • JIMJFOX says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 7:15 pm

      It has NOT worked.
      https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/10/france-admits-its-deradicalization-program-for-jihadis-has-been-a-failure

      WHY don’t you bother to check before opening your ignorant mouth??

      • Joe says

        Dec 28, 2016 at 6:42 am

        Islam is an assimilation strategy that is about a thousand years old. It is out of date, and much better methods exist today.

        For example, anyone and everyone in America would learn why we are American. American children would learn about freedom of religion and free speech. The indoctrination of children into a culture is well understood, but we don’t practice it like we used to. Our often evil leaders know these methods are effective, and they attack the moral and ethical standards.

        Christians often understand Islam, but Muslims are ignorant of Christianity. For example, I bet this KSM guy, who is supposed to be smart, can not speak of the religious tradition of Europe. He can’t give an impromptu biography of Benedict, Francis, or Colette. He doesn’t know how the world’s largest religion spread across the world. He would be surprised to find that God directly intervenes for this religion. He seems like a pretty ignorant guy to me.

        American and the rest of the world’s failure to assimilate is on purpose. We often have evil leaders who try to ensure that American dream dies. We have no plan to assimilate immigrants. It is easy to do, and assimilating the children of immigrants is a piece of cake. Schools should allow and require religious debate. Could any Muslim defend the Koran in front of the class? Christians always have to do this with the Bible. Teen peer pressure is a powerful assimilation tactic.

        America has laws that say people have to work to get welfare. If we enforced that law, we would defund a lot of our problems. As the Nazis knew, work is another assimilation tactic. Is that why we don’t practice it?

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 8:26 pm

      Mortimer, I do not condone Jim’s rudeness to you, but he is right about the failed French program.

      I’m not sure why you keep pushing the idea of deprogramming Muslims–this has *never* worked, and you have never answered why you think pious Muslims would listen to us “filthy Infidels” in the first place.

  7. Veka Fitzfrancis says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 7:31 pm

    Here’s a crazy idea. Vet people who come here. Don’t bring in anyone that can’t be deeply vetted, and true vetting not Obama’s BS vetting. Deport any imams who preach Sharia over Constintutional Law. Close and seize the assets of any mosques found harboring jihadis. Ditto madrases. Flat out make sharia courts illegal. And teach the TRUE history of Islam in schools, not this BS from Qatar in Common Core.

  8. davej says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 7:56 pm

    You cannot have a war where only one side believes it to be one. This situation would be more accurately described as a slaughter and a surrender, as we see in Europe and increasingly in the US.

    We face an implacable and resourceful foe, one that feels a devotion unto martyrdom. There is a reason that they find sports, music, alcohol or pets to be “un-Islamic” – they are all a distraction from the single minded pursuit of the war on the rest of humanity.

    They have no interest in education except the Quran, no interest in science except for weaponry, no interest in the arts or culture except as they may advance the Muslim cause. This is a Messianic cult with end time ambitions and we should take them as seriously as they take themselves.

    • PRCS says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 8:54 pm

      “You cannot have a war where only one side believes it to be one”

      In this case, where only some members of only one side believes it to be one.

      Despite what Qur’an/Sunn’ah state, not every Muslim believes they are personally “at war” with “filthy unbelievers”.

      I’m not a Zhudi Jasser fan, but I’m pretty sure he’s in that camp.

      • Norger says

        Dec 28, 2016 at 9:32 am

        Not every Muslim for sure, but I’d venture that the “true believers” number in the tens if not hundreds of millions. This isn’t some insignificant number of people we’re talking about; there are entire countries full of these religious fanatics. I do think it’s an existential threat. I don’t claim to have the answers, but I’m sick of our leaders pretending the problem doesn’t exist (and pretending countries like Saudi Arabia are our allies)

        • PRCS says

          Dec 28, 2016 at 3:56 pm

          I don’t disagree.

          “We”, we “filthy unbelievers”, need a rational plan to counter the problem–the ideology, its followers (from the least to the most devout), and the false “Islam is a religion of peace” narrative.

    • t. says

      Dec 27, 2016 at 9:10 pm

      davejm my comment below was on your above comment; I don’t know why it was skewed!

    • Eric Jones says

      Dec 29, 2016 at 1:11 am

      Here. Here.

      Eric

  9. t. says

    Dec 27, 2016 at 9:05 pm

    davej, this is one of the most beautiful comments I’ve read lately on this site, and it is to the point!

  10. f c king says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 4:01 am

    They need to put this creature back in an orange jump suit, and shave that crab trap. He needs to be put on top of a sky scraper and have gasoline burning everywhere so he has the choice of burning or jumping.

  11. scherado says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 4:37 am

    I saw this on C-SPAN recently and found one part, in particular, that is useful for anyone who needs to know or convey, for obvious reasons, what is meant by “Islam is a religion of peace”. At hh:mm:ss==01:31:45 (or pages 11-12 of transcript; note that it is not entirely accurate; ex: “we get vote in”, should be, “we get a vote in” [pg 12]):

    //One of the conversations I had with him in a snippet was I said, you guys are telling us that Islam is a religion of peace. What’s that about? And he said it is a religion of peace. The world will be at peace when Sharia law is imposed on the whole world. So we’re a religion of peace because we’re trying to impose Sharia law on the whole world. Right now, it’s not at peace because you have all of these different groups who believe that they can influence how things are going.

    He told me that Western democracy and true Sharia law could not coexist because we foolishly believe that we get [a] vote in how we live, that we can decide what our fashions are, that we can decide the laws that need to be enforced, that we can change those laws. Well, not true. In his mind, how we’re supposed to live was established 1,400 years ago in the Koran and in the perfect words and deeds of the prophet. There’s no question about how we do that.//

  12. Aton says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 4:54 am

    The defeat of Islam in the west is easy – just make an honest Hollywood blockbuster about the life of Muhummad and the birth of Islam.

    If the people of the West were given the truth about Islam, and Muhummad’s beheading of 800 Jews and the nature of the Protection Racket he founded, they would instantly reject it.

    So we could defeat Islam, for a cost of about $500 million. That is all.

    Aton

    • PRCS says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 10:39 am

      A great idea.

      But difficult to imagine that “Hollywood” would ever sign off on it.

  13. Matthieu Baudin says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 6:20 am

    “… Khalid Sheikh Mohammad considered Islam a ‘religion of peace. The world will be at peace when sharia law is imposed on the whole world.’…”

    In Islamic parlance Peace equates to Submission. Time and again this is confirmed and yet the apologists for Muslim excesses continue without fail to present this particular notion of Peace as if it were like the Peace of Christmas or the Peace that can be found in Natural Tranquillity or when foes decide mutually to bury the hatchet. No, this particular Peace is married to a singular goal, a final subjugation and submission and it is this focus that reveals today’s International Jihad as a truly Millenarian movement.

    • PRCS says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 10:46 am

      Many, here at JW, know that.

      But too many “journalists” and politicians, whether intentionally or not, are not telling the truth about it.

  14. Charles says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 8:01 am

    It uncanny!
    All of these learned Mullahs look EXACTLY like my Dog’s arse!
    That tattoo I had put in my old Sow’s arse was a HUGE HIT at our annual Christmas party! And everyone knew that face at once!
    “OMG! They said, it’s old Mo himself!
    Merry Christmas to all!
    And a very HAPPY NEW YEAR! ☺

  15. shabeerhassan0 says

    Dec 28, 2016 at 9:08 am

    Prohibit killing non Muslim with peace agreement:
    8: 72. Verily, those who believed, and emigrated and strove hard and fought with their property and their lives in the Cause of Allah as well as those who gave (them) asylum and help, – these are (all) allies to one another. And as to those who believed but did not emigrate (to you O Muhammad SAW), you owe no duty of protection to them until they emigrate, but if they seek your help in religion, it is your duty to help them except against a people with whom you have a treaty of mutual alliance, and Allah is the All-Seer of what you do.
    9: 4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you have a treaty, and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor have supported anyone against you. So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term. Surely Allah loves Al- Mattaqûn
    4: 90. Except those who join a group, between you and whom there is a treaty (of peace), or those who approach you with their breasts restraining from fighting you as well as fighting their own people. Had Allah willed, indeed He would have given them power over you, and they would have fought you. So if they withdraw from you, and fight not against you, and offer you peace, then Allah has opened no way for you against them.
    91. You will find others that wish to have security from you and security from their people. Every time they are sent back to temptation, they yield thereto. If they withdraw not from you, nor offer you peace, nor restrain their hands, take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them. In their case, We have provided you with a clear warrant against them.

    • Norger says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 11:33 am

      How long are those “peace treaties” good for? Wasn’t your prophet (and his followers) notorious for entering into peace treaties when Islam was weak and breaking the so-called “treaties” when Islam was strong? We will NEVER submit to Islam.

      • iMusalmaanmasala says

        Dec 28, 2016 at 12:17 pm

        Well said. This guy shabeerhassan0 is trying a taqqiya with us thinking that we can be fooled like the silly stupid leaders we have voted into power.
        Mohammedf was an ace liar and a breaker of treaties. He broke a 10 year peace treaty withing 2 years ONCE HIS ARMY WAS READY.
        We have to be careful of this. Islam lies to sleep and lie low like snakes till they are strong enough to strike that fatal blow

    • PRCS says

      Dec 28, 2016 at 1:29 pm

      I completely disagree shabeer,

      Individual Muslims (like you, I suspect) and Muslim nations need to be told that we “filthy unbelievers” will never comply with Islam’s religious beliefs in order to achiever ITS understanding of peace.

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 29, 2016 at 12:25 am

      More ham-fisted Taqiyya from this apologist for Muslim savagery.

  16. Eric Jones says

    Dec 29, 2016 at 1:03 am

    This is a very good article. To paraphrase William Cooper of Behold A Pale Horse; ‘you don’t have to believe what I am telling you about what the elites are doing, the problem is that the elites belive in what they are doing.’ Same with the jihad’s.

    From personal experience don’t open your front door to bad people. So control your borders. Vet all muslims coming into the USA.

    Stop assuming that people from other cultures and religions share your intentions and motivations. No islam is not the religion of peace. ‘By their actions you will know them.’

    Some may have the emotional belief that torture is a way to get at the bad guys. Experts say and I concur that torture does not work. The person being tortured will only tell you what he thinks you want to hear. This can serve as disinformation.

    Eric

    • don vito says

      Dec 29, 2016 at 2:20 am

      This thread disproves that “torture” doesn’t work. EIT got the info from the terrorist jihadis. Mitchell writes of its success.

  17. Makenomistake says

    Jan 2, 2017 at 6:47 am

    Islamic treaties , islamic peace, islamic kindness, islamic goodness….. all have an inverted meaning which are served to the unassuming people before Islam is totally ready for its act of butchering . These inverted meanings have done immense confusion and damage among non muslims,and they have fallen prey to the vicious designs of islamic atrocities ,losing everything by the way.
    It is time to efface islam, both ideologically and physically, never to be able again to raise its ugly head to the utter peril of peace loving people.
    Enough is sufficient !

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Michael Copeland on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Westman on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.