• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Actress: Wear hijab to inauguration to “stand in solidarity with our about-to-be-disenfranchised Muslim sisters”

Jan 19, 2017 11:39 am By Robert Spencer

More hysteria. Who is about to disenfranchise Muslim women? In any case, Kathy Najimy has now ably signaled her virtue, and can now sit back and enjoy the rounds of applause she will receive from the enlightened and intelligent, but where is her concern for Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it? Or Aqsa and Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab? Or the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; or Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; or Amira Osman Hamid, who faced whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; or the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; or the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; or the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; or the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; or the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; or the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; or the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; or the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents, or all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab?

Who is standing in solidarity with them? Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence. At the same time, the women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who speaks for them?

“We should wear hijabs for Donald Trump’s inauguration in support of ‘Muslim sisters’, says US actress,” by May Bulman, Independent, January 19, 2017:

An American actress is encouraging women to wear head scarves on Donald Trump’s inauguration day in a show of solidarity with Muslim women who wear the hijab.

Kathy Najimy, best known for starring in Sister Act and Disney’s Hocus Pocus, recommended women attending an anti-inauguration march in Washington on Friday wear a scarf around their heads, “hijab style”, as a way of standing with their “about-to-be-disenfranchised Muslim Sisters”.

In a statement posted on Facebook, 59-year-old Ms Najimy wrote: “We wanted to create an action, visible and easy, to proclaim our commitment to freedom of religion and to the constitution — religion or no religion.

“We intend to show that we stand in solidarity with our about-to-be-disenfranchised Muslim sisters.”

The actress insisted that such an act would not mean endorsing any religious doctrine, but “standing for freedom”, adding: “We support every woman’s right to worship as they wish and live in security and peace.

“We are by no means endorsing or aligning with any religious doctrine, but simply standing for freedom.”

Ms Najimy is leading a campaign group called Sisterhood of the Travelling Scarves in the nationwide call ahead of a women’s march on Friday, which is expected to see more than 100,000 people in Washington to protest against Mr Trump’s presidency, viewing it specifically as a “feminist issue”….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Useful idiots, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Kathy Najimy


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. FYI says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 11:46 am

    Maybe she should wear a pendant while she’s at it…as show of solidarity and in memory of the Yazidi..

    • pandainc says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 5:07 pm

      Or a necklace with a Christian cross and a Star of David to show her support for all the dead Christians and Jews murdered by the cult.

  2. mortimer says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 11:58 am

    THE ISLAMIC VEIL IS ABOUT ISLAMIC PATRIARCHY… THE CONTROL OF WOMEN… and nothing else.

    Kathy Najimy is part of the ARISTOCRACY OF THE UNINFORMED ABOUT ISLAM (Ai-Ai, for short). She knows NOTHING about the DHIMMITUDE concept.

    Aviv Goldstein wrote the following about the humiliation inherent in DHIMMITUDE:

    “Dhimmi is the Arabic term that refers to its non-Islamic population that has the ignominious dishonor of living in Islamic conquered lands. In a similar manner to the Jewish reference to a non-Jew as being a goy, so too the term dhimmi refers to non-Muslims. However unlike the Jewish term, goy, and much more important, the dhimmi is a distinctly subjugated second class non-citizen almost slave who is subjected to dictatorial deprivation of any legal and human rights since he is a non-Muslim permanent resident in a Muslim state.
    Dhimmi is also the name of a book written by Bat Ye’or, a pseudonym, of a woman who grew up in Egypt as a British citizen and observed first hand the Islamic treatment of non-Muslims. Based on serious research, Dhimmi was first published in French in 1971, translated into English in 1985, later into Hebrew and Russian, Dhimmi is a must reading for anyone seriously desiring an understanding of Middle-East politics and the rationale of the Arab mentality.”

    Kathy Najimy is choosing VOLUNTARY HUMILIATION under Sharia law.

    • Jack HOLAN says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 8:57 pm

      Let’s face it since Hocus Pocus She has had a lot of time on her hand. Hollywood “People”from Tinsel Town join causes to keep themselves entertained in between gigs. Some even have a decade or two. This Hijab throw in looks like a last minute attempt to be all inclusive and Worldly. It backfired because of the ignorance of these women. Instead of being a symbol of Freedom, in the real Islamic World, it’s a Symbol of Cover up or you are a rape target and you would deserve it. Afterwards a your Family husband Father brother might kill you to save the honor of the family. Yes Kathy you are on top of this issue and believe it’s a “cause de’ Affair”for Symbolizing the Right of a Muslim woman to wear one not that she is being forced to wear Hijab. I suppose there is something to be said about an ignoramus who uses her simpleton ideas to promote a oxymoron concept. Who will you put in danger next?

      • Terry says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 9:27 pm

        In my view, with luck, herself and Hanoi Jane and their bretherin (sisterin?)

        Michael Moore could also go, along with Colon of the 49ers.

        Clean up the gene pool.

        • Terry says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 9:28 pm

          How long has she been an actress? I admit, I do not watch television and rarely go to movies, but at 59- should have been around for some years-I never heard of her.

  3. Diane Harvey says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 12:04 pm

    “Kathy Najimy has now ably signaled her virtue, and can now sit back and enjoy the rounds of applause she will receive from the enlightened and intelligent,”

    *****

    “Hey, I placed and lit a candle on the street corner where that Muslim ran over those tourists.”

    “I stood there and looked upon the Arc de Triomphe as it was lit up in the tri-colors in solidarity with the 80 or more killed by the Muslim truck driver in Nice. I held flowers in my hand. And I cried.”

    ” I bought a ticket and went to see a show in the Moulin Rouge to show those Muslims that we’re brave after those Muslims murdered some many at the Bataclan theater.”

    “I’ve done my part. I care. Look at me. Praise me. I am a Proud Progressive!”

    • Westman says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 3:01 pm

      How true.

      The liberal’s version of “cause and effect”: Observe the effect and make up a cause.

    • Shmooviyet says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 3:21 pm

      @Diane Harvey: Excellent.

      “See, here are all the selfies I took at each location– see MY tears?”
      “Here is the candle, that’s MY hand holding it!”
      “ME in MY Bataclan-Sting-concert tee!”

      Wetting themselves with self-pride, ugh.

  4. Rufus Cornpone says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 12:05 pm

    She needs to wear a veil to cover her ugly mug. Did she play the Sea Hag in the pirates movie. I can’t recall seeing her in any movies…”Islamophobia” is a word used to criminalize legitimate criticism of Islam…

    • DAI says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 3:17 pm

      Wasnt she a fat bitch once,I mean ,fat. Typical looking J**

  5. Voytek Gagalka says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 12:05 pm

    Why only on the inauguration? Who in (Islamic) hell prevents this so called “actress” from wearing her hijab all the time? Isn’t she offending any pious Mohammedan already when she does not wear it? Typical moronic leftist hypocrisy: “one measure for you but quite another for myself.”

  6. Westman says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 12:08 pm

    And will the women marchers on the 21st have any of the hundreds of millions of oppressed Muslim women in mind? No, they will be thinking of one man – truly ironic.

  7. Bill says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 12:25 pm

    Celebrities have agents that set this stuff up for them. It keeps them in the public eye and it does not matter what the cause may be, so long as it is notorious enough to grab attention.

    • DAI says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 3:20 pm

      To the right of my screne there is an Ad for Hijabs!!! From house of fraser

    • Peggy says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 8:30 pm

      Whoever said that any publicity is good publicity is dead wrong.
      This will only alienate us from these morons.
      I had liked some people on FB but have since got rid of them. I will not give my money for their movies or songs. What we all should do is not buy their movies or songs but pirate them if we want to see them.
      That and post disapproval on their FB or whatever social media they are using.

  8. Atheist Kaffur says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 12:26 pm

    Since you want solidarity so much with Muslim women why don’t you wear it yourself all the time, You should also get yourself a real pious Muslim boyfriend just in case you forget or don’t feel like wearing it He will be able to explain and demonstrate to you the consequences.

    • Jack Holan says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 2:29 pm

      Actually, the hijab is a very minor part that reflects a 100% controlled life that these Hollywood types don’t get at all. Likely there is no boyfriend but an arranged marriage in the future. The woman may even have a male blood related escort. Why don’t they hold this protest in an all Pakistani or Somali neighborhood and see what kind of welcome committee will come out to greet them. Pro Refugee Demonstrators kill two birds with one stone hold the demonstrations where the New “Syrian” refugees live.

  9. Vic says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 1:06 pm

    Bravo, Mr. Spencer! Thank you for shedding the light on the truth!
    You mean, Ms. Najimy, that Muslim women can be further disenfranchised? More than their religion already has? Covering is not about making a fashion statement.
    Ms. Najimy needs to read the Koran and instruct herself how Muslim women have been disenfranchised for at least 1200 years. They have suffered and continue to suffer to this day. Covering is only one of the issues, but it is not a small one. If Ms. Najimy really wanted to help, she should learn the truth before calling her friends and followers to cover themselves. Talk to Ani Cyrus at the Glazov Gang.
    Covering sets women apart in the Koran, not purely as an act of modesty. The more important message is sent to Muslim men: covered women are not prey to be raped. All other women without covering are fair game. See the incredible rise in the number of rapes of “uncovered” women as soaring number of Muslim immigrants flood western countries. Why do devout Muslim men even kill their daughters for not wearing the covering? Message: They are not available to be raped as that would bring dishonor to the family. Amazingly, if the girl refuses to wear the covering and she is raped, it is always the girls fault. Not the perpetrators. After all, the women/girls were given fair warning. Barbaric, tribal thinking!
    Why don’t you get behind that cause and denounce the “covering”, Ms. Najimy?

  10. Angemon says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    Kathy Najimy, best known for starring in Sister Act and Disney’s Hocus Pocus, recommended women attending an anti-inauguration march in Washington on Friday wear a scarf around their heads, “hijab style”, as a way of standing with their “about-to-be-disenfranchised Muslim Sisters”.

    A shame that actresses starve themselves – in a few months, when Trump DOESN’T round up and deport muslims for their religion, DOESN’T send women to the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant, DOESN’T send gays to electrocute them into being straight or DOESN’T place black people in chains there’ll be plenty of crow with their names on it… She may be of Lebanese ancestry, but Brigitte Gabriel she isn’t…

  11. concerned canadian says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 1:09 pm

    whats the lowest Letter you can go for crappy actress ?

    Z ???

    Who the heck cares what she thinks
    She wont be there and no one listens to her anyways

    Worry more about the people your religion kills you follower of satan

  12. Rev G says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 1:10 pm

    She should know better, being of Lebanese Catholic descent.

  13. marina says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 1:12 pm

    Dear Kathy why don’t you take a month long vacation to Saudi Arabia. Or better if you convert.

    • Terry says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:35 pm

      Pakistan would be better. More likely to be killed there. And take Hanoi Jane and others like her and you with you there. Someone said that Pakistan International Airlines is one of the (or the ) most unsafe airlines. So fly it.

  14. mgoldberg says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 1:30 pm

    One would think there might be some shame, at the horror of those killed for not wearing an hijab in muslim nations. One would think there might be an iota of concern for the barbarity inflicted upon those who suffered for choosing to not wear a hijab.
    But in the world of progressives, utopianism disavows any such critiquing of other cultures, religions, and even bumping up a cheer for the tyranny for the tyranny of the hijab as just another group of oppressed needing support.

  15. Jack Holan says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 2:05 pm

    Kathy as a simpleton maybe you’ll suggest an FGM tent for all woman to be part of the Umma

  16. Walter Sieruk says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 2:22 pm

    This actress , Kathy Najimy comes across as a very uninformed ans even confused person. Nevertheless,That Donald Trump will soon become the next President of the United States this actually means there is still hope for America.. One thy to explain this is that since the leftists ,the Marxists and the jihadists all hate Mr. Trump with a passion is powerful evidence that Donald trump is the right man to become the next US President . In other words, those all those characters just mention terrible detest Mr. Trump not only serves as a good compliment to him but this also reveals that Donald Trump must be an all American patriot..

    • Jack Holan says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 2:35 pm

      I didn’t see it from this perspective, though Pro-Trump. You’re absolutely spot-on.

    • Terry says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:44 pm

      Great comment in DRY BONES (an Israeli political cartoon–either: drybones.com or drybones.org).

      Trump lowest approval ratings—etc, according to polls.

      Next caption. The same polls that showed that Hillary Clinton would be elected President.

      ——————————————————————————————————————————–

      ACCORDING TO GOOGLE. There are 3,144 counties ( and parishes-Louisiana) in the US.

      TRUMP WON A MAJORITY OR AT LEAST A PLURALITY IN 3,084 OF THEM.

      So, he lost 60 counties or 0.190859——–% or rounded 0.191% of ALL OF THE COUNTIES IN THIS COUNTRY, CLINTON WON.

      And these assholes are protesting his election.

      And NOT MY PRESIDENT. This morning, on the radio I heard ( which I have also said-privately)- (in different terms) there are planes leaving all of the time for other countries- get on one of them.

  17. Wellington says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 2:23 pm

    Might as well wear a swastika as wear an hijab since both are symbols of totalitarianism.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 2:46 pm

      Yep.

      Exactly.

      I wonder how best one could point up that analogy. How does one break through the programming and enable people to see the aggression – indeed the not-so-very-thinly-veiled threat – encoded in a Muslim female’s Gang Colours/ Sharia Badge which is also her Slave Rag.

  18. JawsV says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 2:27 pm

    I’ve never heard of her, but she’s an absolute moron.

  19. David says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 2:47 pm

    Muslim women have been disenfranchised for 1400 years. These Hollywood types have no familiarity with reality. It is going to hit them up the side of the head one day.

  20. Peter says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 3:00 pm

    The Useful Idiot should walk down a street in a Muslim country dressed as she is in the photo and see how much love she gets from those she presumes are inherently peaceful, tolerant and supportive of women’s rights.

    • somehistory says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 11:56 pm

      I was thinking something similar. Do not any of them recall the reporter in Egypt back in 2011 who was attacked by the moslim mobs in the middle of the city? Her name was Lara or Lana and everyone was making such a big story of it at the time. Now, not so much.

      If this woman, of whom I have never heard and never seen, dressed that way in any moslim dominated country, or maybe now even UK or Sweden, she might wish she had stayed home and kept silent about how wonderful are her moslim *sisters* who will be marching with her to show how much *freedom* they enjoy from islam and the males who embrace the death cult.

  21. davej says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 3:05 pm

    Another empty headed “celebrity” who has been infected by the Islamic brain worm. (It gets in more readily if there is not much in there to begin with).

    She wanted to do something “visible and easy” – true, had she wanted to do something difficult she could have traveled to any Muslim country without a hajib and documented what happened (if she survived).

    All this unasked-for censorship and appeasement in advance is done for one reason – FEAR!

  22. miriamrove says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 3:05 pm

    First of all no one should be surprised as this PC Hollywood. Besides what do you expect? Her parents are a bunch backwards people from Lebanon. m

  23. DFD says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 3:11 pm

    Sometimes I am simply amazed about JihadWatch – or Islam? Serious, serious. But, nevertheless, sometimes hilarious….

    Well, the scarf is nothing! Let’s have a look at animals and regulations to these, then about sex with corpses (and you thought you know something about Islam? Hah!); then about children – nah. You know that bit.

    And here we go! ibn Sharib relates that Ibn Abdul Talib said: “Whenever his wives were in their monthly cleaning period, I often saw the messenger of Allah near his camel herd. There he practised loving husbandry with the females of the herd, but he also cared for the younger animals of both sexes.” (Sahih Al-Buchari Book. 2, Nr. 357 )

    Or, again Sahih Al-Buchari, but Book. 1, Nr. 213; Abu Halladj reported: “I saw Allah’s messenger frequently after dusk with his herd. One evening he stood there on a bench with his Djelabba pulled up, behind his favored she camel, the one with the sixteen nipples,and both had a blessed smile on their faces. As if they had seen the very face of Allah Ta’ala.” And Ayatholla Khomeini in his work ‘ Tahrir Al-Wasilah’, at Point 23′ writes that if a man had sexual intercourse with an animal that..then….. in short, instructions to slaughter or sell the animal, pay compensation if he wasn’t the owner, or simply sell it on to another village, etc…..

    And now, ‘The book of the Dead’! No, not the dummy movie! (don’t be a dummy.) Here it refers to practices of the ‘prophet’. In the book of Al-Mutaki Al-Hindi, which is based upon a collection of Hadiths by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti, it is written: ‘It is reported on the authority of ibn Abbas that Mohammed “slept” with a dead woman in her grave so as to ease for her the burden of the grave.” My, wasn’t he kind hearted? Truly unique among all the prophets!

    Wott?! You don’t believe this?
    Go to Al Arabiya News: http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/04/25/210198.html
    third paragraph on down. They are TRULY PROGRESSIVE! Stepping into outright modernity: For once, they put a time limit of 6 hours after death on it – what a step into the modern age. For another, TRUE EQUALITY between the sexes! For Zamzami Abdul Bari (also) said that marriage remains valid even after death *** adding that a woman too had the same right to engage in sex with her dead husband. **** (Remark: Talk about a stiff one……) Well, they refer to it as ‘Farewell intercourse’ – one wonders what they’ll do or call it on erection day. Oh dear oh dear, I meant of course ‘resurection day’, how silly of me…

    • No Fear says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 4:17 pm

      Excellent News reference. Looks like they are adding necrophilia to pedophilia as “legal”.

      • DFD says

        Jan 19, 2017 at 6:11 pm

        Yeah, but far worse is our caving in to them. In Germany there has been NO public mentioning of the victims of the Christmas massacre in Berlin! No ‘candle chain’, only appeals by the governing clique – the traitor dhimmies of the Merkel regime.

        Tonight there was a privately organized memorial service at the Gedächtniss Kirche, near the place it happened. Names read out aloud, etc.

        The only places were you could find the victims mentioned were the alternative media. PI magazine for instance lists also the names and shows pictures. It also states that there was today, 31 days after the massacre, a ‘gedenk (memorial) session’ in the Bundestag – 153 seconds as far as I know. Generally and of apologies for Merkel, plus a warning not to generalize. How many seconds for the victims? No idea.

        The victims were Germans, Poles, Italians, Ukrainians and two unknown. Pi Magazine shows the Pictures and the names. I assume you don’t speak German, should you be interested, the first picture is of a 22 year old young Polish girl, her parents are the last two pictures, a Mr. & Mrs. Anna und Gregoriy Borzov. In between the pictures and the names of the other victims. Here’s the link: http://tinyurl.com/gnn65b3

  24. No Fear says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 3:16 pm

    Attention seeking.

  25. Shmooviyet says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 3:50 pm

    No solidarity felt for the girls forced back into the inferno that was their school!
    Back to H’wood obscurity with her, after her proud anti-Trump-day moment in the sun–or so she’s hoping.
    (maybe Empress Meryl will notice her this time.)

  26. Troybeam says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 4:53 pm

    Stand in solidarity: What a load of BS, actresses not seen for years will storm the streets of DC just to be seen again, they know naught what they do and why but we looking into the scene know that Islam is thanking these ignorant people for helping their cause.

  27. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 6:19 pm

    mr spencer, i want know if it is an article of faith in your christianity to appear nude or half-naked?i have noticed that whenever hijab or modest and descent dressing is mentioned, christians feel uncomfortable.mr spencer, why making reference and condemnation of quranic injunctions simply because this lady appears in modest and descent dressing?

    • marc says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 6:28 pm

      @ibrahim itace muhammed
      I emailed you last night, you have ignored, last warning
      stop putting your email address in as “website” when you post
      I admin and moderate at jihadwatch.org, you’re putting your email address in the wrong place, it is causing issues, if you really need to share your email address put it in the body of the comment itself.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 19, 2017 at 8:49 pm

      If it’s all about modesty why then don’t the men wear hijabs and burquas?
      Do they have permission to be uncovered as much as they like because men can do whatever they want and nobody has the right to correct them, especially a woman?
      When men are expected to cover up for “modesty” then the women can be expected too but until then, it’s just men controlling the women.

  28. Kilfincelt says

    Jan 19, 2017 at 10:10 pm

    Just another case of liberal insanity!

  29. somehistory says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 12:03 am

    She’ll be proclaiming her worship of the wild beast and proudly getting her “mark.”

    All to get the attention of the public which she craves. May as well go whole-hog and cover her ugly face with a part of the scarf. Her name and foolish actions will soon be forgotten.

  30. JudyG says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 12:54 am

    The man has yet to do one thing and these crazy liberals are imagining all kinds of things. How about waiting to see what happens and then reacting. But I do suggest you get a comfort dog and a lifetime supply of playdough to help you through anything you are imagining atm – Liberals man you guys are just special (and not in a nice way)

  31. fedupAmerican says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 2:51 am

    What about freedom not to wear a Hijab? What about all the women who don’t want to wear one who are forced to wear one in Muslim areas of Europe?

  32. LairdKintyre says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 4:15 am

    She is so much like the cartoon character she voices, Peggy Hill. Opinionated and Ignorant.

  33. K. says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 4:21 am

    So by tonight this evil cult will be disenfranchised? Good. Her choice if she wants to go with it.

  34. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 5:36 am

    k, your filthy christianity is cult invented by the devil in 325 ad.all christians must leave the united states for remaining aboriginists you erased many of them.you have to go back to europe.devil trump is of recent imigration have go first.your masters the evil jews have to follow suit.you are wicked people stealing the from other nations you are now proud of.idiot morons!!!!!

    • Carolyne says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 1:05 pm

      And exactly how did most of the Middle East become Muslim? Under threat of death by the barbarians from Mecca. You are really stupid, but I don’t blame you. Your parents were first cousins, weren’t they?

  35. Carolyne says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 1:03 pm

    Donald Trump just said the words, “Islamic Terrorism.” Its a start.

  36. Susette says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 2:27 pm

    Her naivete is striking. Donning a hijab is not a show of solidarity. It is a submission to the patriarchy. What a stupid woman.

  37. Screeminmeeme says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 6:31 pm

    I suggest Kathy submit to Female Genital Mutilation if she really wants to show solidarity with Muslim women.

  38. gravenimage says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 10:17 pm

    Actress: Wear hijab to inauguration to “stand in solidarity with our about-to-be-disenfranchised Muslim sisters”
    ………………………..

    Suicidal idiot.

  39. dumbledoresarmy says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:59 am

    Meanwhile in Egypt a Muslim mob seized an elderly Christian grandmother and *stripped her naked* and paraded her in the street and beat her.

    Perhaps Ms Najimy will strip in public (Lady Godiva style) in solidarity with this poor woman?

  40. SweetOlBob says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 6:05 am

    Maybe she should donate her clitoris in solidarity with “her muslim sisters who are about to be disenfranchised” eh ?
    After all, Solidarity is Solidarity, isn’t it ?

  41. Isabella says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 8:23 am

    Totally useful idiot!!

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Infidel on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.