Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.
On this new special episode of The Unknown, Anni Cyrus focuses on Lies About Hijab 101, unveiling a “seminar” that is setting out to normalize vicious savagery against women.
Don’t miss it!
And make sure to watch Jamie Glazov discuss What a Woman in Hijab is Really Saying to You, revealing the terrifying truth about what it really signifies: CLICK HERE.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account or GoFundMe campaign to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel and to Jamie Glazov Productions. Also LIKE us on Facebook and LIKE Jamie’s FB Fan Page.
EmHotep says
Anyone who wears hijab-turban etc. is political ISLAMIST/jihadist. When we had allow them here they started organising against the non hijab wearers.
SO THEY ARE THE EXACT TARGET. ITS THEIR SIGN NOT THE RELIGION !!! WAKE UP. THEY MUST BE OUR TARGET. NO MORE MERCY.
PRCS says
In researching whether “the veil” is required (it’s not universally understood to be), I came across this article– https://www.quora.com/Is-wearing-hijab-a-choice –which included the following (which I imagine my primary care physician would disagree with):
“An average woman lags behind an average man in the build of her body and its basic organs, like the brain, the heart, the veins, the nerves, her height and weight. (The details may be seen in any book of anatomy.)”
What’s the one thing I took from that?
Neandertals have NOT become fully extinct.
Achmed says
” … Hijab 101, what’s next …”
Introduction to the performance of Female Genital Mutilation I and Clitoris Removal II (FGM I is requisite for enrollment).
ibrahim itace muhammed says
emhotep,you are still with your stupidity against islam claiming to be turkish,which is a lie.you are filthy bad smelly christian who believe that nudity is a sign that one is civilised. to us it is a sign of barbarity, savagery and primitivity similar to life in arabia before islam.it means you have lost your humanity and reduced to status of beasts.human life is clothed with descency and modesty.when you remove those cclothes of descency and modesty you become beast.this clothe of modesty and descency is called hijab.there is no fixed type of clothing material for it.the important thing is to cover all sensitive parts of your body.for women all parts of her body with exception of face,hands and feets, are sensitive and atractive parts of her body.for men from ankle to neck are sensitive parts atracting women.note, women are allowed to use any beautifying wears as hijab,including wears made from gold,silver,diamond and silk.but men are not allow to use them as wears.that is position of the sharia on wears,which muslims are expected to followed. stupid emhotep wants muslims to abandone their descent and modest mode of dressing and imitate savage way of life in filthy christian west like what evil kemal ataturks imposed on muslim turks.to hell with it.
Achmed says
There is but one satan and his name is allah. And, the lowest and most cowardly of his demons is mohammed.
Achmed says
Would someone please be kind enough to translate this from Hog Language (what mohammedans use when the attempt to address human beings) into some language spoken by human beings?
Thanking you in advance, I remain
Very truly yours,
Achmed
Ray Sears says
I wish that I could meet YOUR sorry ass so I could EXPRESS my true feelings about LYING SCUMBAG MUSLIMS LIKE YOURSELF !
Ed Kester says
I see the Hijab & Burka as something they want US to get use to seeing, so that when they ready to Attack US Infidels. We dont notice that Bombs & Weapons can be concealed under them, & that no one can Identify anyone under them, Females or Males
billybob says
Ibrahim says…
“for women all parts of her body with exception of face, hands and feets, are sensitive and attractive parts of her body”
No onus on the part of the man to show self restraint Ibrahim? Are you saying that Muslim men are inherently rapists, and the only thing that stops them from raping Muslim women is the fact they are covered up?
And what about Muslim men? Are you not afraid a woman might find them attractive and therefore a temptation? Don’t you think that men should cover up out of respect to women?
Oh – I guess I can answer my own question for that last one. You Muslims have found another way to protect women from being led astray by the sight of men. You simply cut off their clitorus to destroy their sexuality. Problem solved. No need for men to cover up now. How ingenious!
billybob says
Ibrahim – you have said so much with that comment, I need to add a second response.
Human life is clothed with decency and modesty. when you remove those clothes of decency and modesty you become beast.
Ibrahim – is it not true we are all born naked? What you are saying is simply not true, and what you believe is why Muslim men are raping Western women (and boys) all over Europe as we speak.
Western women may appear nearly naked in public, on the beach or in the gym, but these women are still modest. Their modesty is within, if you can understand that. They retain their innocence, because they are not signaling sexual availability by being dressed like that. It is not all about you. It is about them being comfortable with the body God gave them, and it is about being appropriately dressed for the occasion.
On the beach, we don’t want a lot of clothes weighing us down in the water. Also many like to get a suntan – not like Muslim women who never get enough sun to generate the Vitamin D necessary for strong bones and teeth. Similarly in the gym, clothes become a restriction on the activities. Try very hard to understand what I am saying, because you are insulting us from your ignorance of our culture. I’m sure you would not want to be insulting us unjustly.
You must understand, for them it is perfectly normal, and not an invitation to rape them. If you began to make these kinds of assumptions and start “hitting on them”, they would be very offended. These women are certainly not beasts. They live in a culture where nudity and semi-nudity is accepted as normal. It does not lead to licentiousness or lewd behaviour except by Muslims. Males in Western society have learned to restrain themselves and are not beasts like the Muslim men who are raping women in Europe as we speak.
[Nudity] to us it is a sign of barbarity, savagery and primitivity similar to life in arabia before islam.it means you have lost your humanity and reduced to status of beasts.human life is clothed with descency and modesty.when you remove those cclothes of descency and modesty you become beast.
But that is not what it is to us. We believe the human form is beautiful, and it has been exalted in our art since the dawn of time. Only your culture is so hung up because you are perpetually stuck in the past. For the rest of the world, fashions come and go constantly throughout the millennia. Only Muslims are stuck in the culture from the 14th century and unable to move with the times.
Stupid emhotep wants muslims to abandon their descent and modest mode of dressing and imitate savage way of life. I doubt emhotep could care less what you do, but Westerners are not savages. We are much more civilized than Muslims. We honour our women and grant them equality with men. We do not force them to wear a bag, nor force them to cut their clitorus off.
gravenimage says
The appalling Muslim supremacist ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
emhotep,you (sic) are still with your stupidity against islam (sic) claiming to be turkish,which (sic) is a lie.
………………………………
Why would mohammed consider this a lie? Does he believe that his genocidal coeligionists succeeded in slaughtering *all* non-Muslims in Turkey? A few Christians managed to survive–and there are a few secularists there, as well.
More:
you (sic) are filthy bad smelly christian (sic) who believe that nudity is a sign that one is civilised. to (sic) us it is a sign of barbarity, savagery and primitivity similar to life in arabia (sic) before islam.it (sic) means you have lost your humanity and reduced to status of beasts.human (sic) life is clothed with descency (sic) and modesty.when (sic) you remove those cclothes (sic) of descency (sic) and modesty you become beast.this (sic) clothe of modesty and descency (sic) is called hijab.
………………………………
Once again, he is claiming that Christians practice poor hygiene–but this is not the case. What he really means is that they do not engage in Islamic practices such as using stones to wipe after visiting the bathroom. Needless to say, this has nothing to do with *actual* cleanliness.
Then, EmHotep has never said that he is Christian, in any case–this is just a projection by muhammed. It is a back-handed compliment to Christians that he considers them the main people who oppose Islamic savagery–but many other good Infidels do, as well.
And eschewing the head bag is not “nudity”–is muhammed really so ignorant?
And of course, the Hijab has *nothing* to do with modesty–here is Qur’an 33:59:
“O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) over their bodies (when outdoors). That is most convenient that they should be known and not molested.”
In other words, women who are *not* veiled may be lawfully raped by Muslims. *That* is what muhammed means by describing us as “beasts”.
More:
there (sic) is no fixed type of clothing material for it.the important thing is to cover all sensitive parts of your body.for (sic) women all parts of her body with exception of face,hands and feets (sic), are sensitive and atractive (sic) parts of her body.for (sic) men from ankle to neck are sensitive parts atracting (sic) women.note, (sic) women are allowed to use any beautifying wears as hijab,including (sic) wears made from gold,silver,diamond (sic) and silk.but (sic) men are not allow to use them as wears.that (sic) is position of the sharia on wears,which (sic) muslims (sic) are expected to followed (sic).
………………………………
Actually, Muslim women have been murdered for wearing colorful Hijabs.
And it is incredibly common for them to be murdered for eschewing the slave rag. A woman who Tweeted a picture of herself outside without a Hijab in Saudi Arabia has been arrested and may face the death penalty.
The Islamic State stoned five women to death for not wearing the Hijab. Toronto teen Aqsa Parvez was strangled by her own father for not wearing Hijab.
muhammed apparently believes this savagery to be perfectly civilized.
More:
stupid (sic) emhotep (sic) wants muslims (sic) to abandone (sic) their descent (sic) and modest mode of dressing and imitate savage way of life in filthy christian (sic) west (sic) like what evil kemal (sic) ataturks (sic) imposed on muslim (sic) turks.to (sic) hell with it.
………………………………
Not, he doesn’t–EmHotep just notes that the Hijab is a symbol of political Islam–and it is. He is also correct in his reference to the implicit threat to those who do not wear Hijab–as I noted in citing Qur’an 33:59.
Here’s is more on that:
“Symposium: To Rape an Unveiled Woman”
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=5347
marina says
I asked several muslimas about wearing of the hijab. They told me if they keep their hair exposed in this earthly life then every single hair will become a snake in the afterlife and bite them. How dumb can anyone get than this.
Debi Brand says
The danger of Islam, my Friend.
No history on Hijab?
Nonsense. It goes no farther then the Qur’an verse you mention?
Garbage.
As the Qur’an commands, obedience to “Allah” is commanded, and “Allah” commanded obedience to the alleged “prophet of Islam.” Tafsir further provides, sunnah of the “prophet” is part of the “revelation” received, and in that sunnah, as sira provides, the “prophet” supported and thus taught the house was the ideal covering “Allah” desired for women.
In brief.
Debi Brand says
Read the rest of post at: http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2017/01/anni-cyrus-on-unknown-lies-about-hijab.html
davej says
The main purpose of the hijab is to mark Muslim women as the possessions they are and to signal that they should not be raped by the depraved Muslim males.
The secondary purpose is to forcefully demonstrate the presence of Islam in our societies, similar to praying in the streets, building Mosques next to churches and demanding prayer rooms, foot baths, etc.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Dave.
overman says
Thanks Anni.
From the deceptions laid out by muslim clerics, lt would seem that the Hijab etc. are only used for the sake of female ‘Modesty’ [men of course can walk around naked if they want]. ln the vid below a cleric does a nice whitewashing job on this. He claims most muslim countries around the world don’t recommend or enforce the wearing of a veil – try walking around in any muslim community in any muslim country [even the West] and see what happens.
overman says
Forgot to say l agree totally – ‘lslam is a war on Humanity’.
Guest says
* I don’t care*! I don’t care if islam tells women to do wear whatever: it should be totally irrelevant to others in a secular society.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
billybob,you are saying you in the west you cherish western value of freedom to become nude and half naked.we,the muslim do not cherish that value.we consider it savagery similar to life in arabia before islam.it means we have differences in perception.as such one cannot impose his value sytem to another.muslims cannot impose islamic way of modesty and descency on you.equally, you have no right to impose your nudity and nakedness on muslims.emhotep was saying political system, which has tendency of allowing muslims to have modest and descent dressing like hijab, shall be fought.note, it is not muslim men who impose hijab on muslim women.muslim women accept it as part of their belief system.in the west, those women converts to islam choose to wear hijab on their own volition despite absence of sharia code on dress there.they are merely conscious of what allah demands from them to do.but we have been seeing harrassments to these women in the west, telling them that such modes of dressing are against the culture in the west.is that not infringement of their freedom of thought?dictator kemal ataturks(may allah curse him) did the same thing in turkey, and he is now in the midle of hellfire as visions by many waliyys(saints)have disclosed.
Carolyne says
In that case, Ibbie, you should not venture out of your hellholes to come to civilization and complain about it. Stay where you are. It would make me happy and apparently since you revere sexual mistreatment of those weaker physically than you, such as women and young boys, it would make you happy. See how simple it is? Problem solved.
billybob says
“We have differences in perception.” So true. I appreciate at least that you read my comments.
gravenimage says
Yet more from ibrahim itace muhammed:
billybob,you (sic) are saying you in the west you cherish western value of freedom to become nude and half naked.we,the(sic) muslim do not cherish that value.
…………………………….
Well, of course muhammed does not cherish freedom. Who ever said that he did?
Ad of course eschewing the head bag is not “nudity”, in any case.
More:
we (sic) consider it savagery similar to life in arabia (sic) before islam (sic).
…………………………….
Where women were allowed to run businesses and hire men? Of course Muslims would hate that sort of equality.
More:
it (sic) means we have differences in perception.
…………………………….
Well, yes–muhammed embraces “values” such as enslaving unbelievers and using them as sex slaves, and conquering Infidels and forcing Christians to convert to islam.
More:
as (sic) such one cannot impose his value sytem (sic) to another.muslims (sic) cannot impose islamic (sic) way of modesty and descency (sic) on you.equally, you have no right to impose your nudity and nakedness on muslims (sic).
…………………………….
Well, that’s just bizarre–isn’t enslaving people or forcing their conversion imposing on us? Not as muhammed sees it, I suppose. And no one is imposing freedom from the slave rag on Muslims–they don’t have to come here if they don’t want to.
And he considers forcing women to cover to be “descent”–what a fine Freudian slip *that* is.
More:
emhotep (sic) was saying political system, which has tendency of allowing muslims (sic) to have modest and descent (sic) dressing like hijab, shall be fought.
…………………………….
Yes–this is political Islam. What problem does muhammed have with this?
More:
note (sic), it is not muslim (sic) men who impose hijab on muslim (sic) women.muslim (sic) women accept it as part of their belief system.
…………………………….
Really? How about these women?
“Pakistani Taliban: wear hijab, or be disfigured”
http://www.violenceisnotourculture.org/content/pakistani-taliban-wear-hijab-or-be-disfigured
“Georgia: Muslim stabs sister for refusing to wear hijab”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/10/georgia-muslim-stabs-sister-for-refusing-to-wear-hijab
More:
in (sic) the west, those women converts to islam (sic) choose to wear hijab on their own volition despite absence of sharia code on dress there.they (sic) are merely conscious of what allah demands from them to do.
…………………………….
“Despite absence of sharia code”–i.e., the state may not be forcing them to wear Hijab–but this is what happens when pious Muslims are in charge.
More:
but (sic) we have been seeing harrassments (sic) to these women in the west, telling them that such modes of dressing are against the culture in the west.is (sic) that not infringement of their freedom of thought?
…………………………….
Does it matter to muhammed that all of these cases have so far proven to be hoaxes? Of course not.
More:
dictator (sic) kemal (sic) ataturks(may (sic) allah (sic) curse him) did the same thing in turkey (sic), and he is now in the midle (sic) of hellfire as visions by many waliyys(saints)have (sic) disclosed.
…………………………….
No–Atatürk did not fake “hate crimes”. But all of his reforms are being dismantled by Erdogan right now in Turkey. As a result, Turkey–which had been halfway on its way to joining the civilized world, is regressing back into Islamic barbarism.