• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Atheist Islamic apologist CJ Werleman calls for violence against his political opponents (and Robert Spencer)

Jan 22, 2017 3:55 pm By Robert Spencer

UPDATE: Seeing my post below, Werleman was unrepentant, and called for violence against me as well. This is the unapologetic thuggery (and genuine neo-Nazism) of the contemporary Left.

CJ Werleman is an atheist writer, author of the immortal classic God Hates You, as well as Koran Curious, which (in sharp contrast to his writings on the Bible) goes very easy on jihad and Sharia, and presents a rosy, whitewashed, apologist’s picture of the Islamic holy book. He is writing in the tweet above about Richard B. Spencer, the neo-Nazi, with whom I am often confused because of the similarity of our names. (Yes, “neo-Nazi”: he was quite concerned in our own interaction to establish that I was a secret Jew who had changed my name and was hiding my true identity, and it became clear during our unpleasant interaction that his is an idolatry of race and blood quite difficult to distinguish from 20th-century European National Socialism, transferred mutatis mutandis to 21st-century America.) Some Left-fascist punched Richard Spencer Friday in Washington, DC, and many mainstream Leftists such as Werleman are not just applauding, but calling for more.

And who could object, right? After all, Richard Spencer is a Nazi, right? He had it coming, right? The New York Times wrote about this question, and included in its story tweets saying, “Who said punching Nazis is wrong? Punching Nazis is the most ‘Murican thing one can do. Captain America does it!” and “If you’re having a conversation about whether or not it’s okay to punch a Nazi, you’re having the wrong conversation.”

Very well. Everyone can agree that Nazis are evil, and so it’s open season on them, right? That’s what Werleman is calling for. There’s just one catch. What if Werleman, or other Leftists like him, decide to broaden the category of those who ought to be made “afraid again”? What if Werleman or other Leftists decide that violence is justified not just against neo-Nazis, but against those who are tougher on the Qur’an and Islam than he is (you know, “racist” “Islamophobes”), or Trump supporters, or some other group they consider morally reprehensible?

The American (and European) Left, as I have noted for years, is growing more authoritarian and thuggish by the day. There is the refusal to discuss or debate, the demonization of all opposition, threats against opponents (direct or indirect, i.e. Georgetown University thug Nathan Lean repeatedly publishing what he thought was my address on Twitter, in an obvious attempt to alert jihadis to my whereabouts and/or frighten me into silence), and now open calls for violence against those whom they hate. Richard B. Spencer’s views are vile. That is not in dispute. But once one accepts the proposition that those with vile views can and should be brutalized, one has opened the door to a more virulent strain of neo-Nazism than Richard B. represents. CJ Werleman, in the final analysis, by calling for violence against his political opponents (something that the Nazis trafficked in regularly and with great relish), has revealed himself to be more of a neo-Nazi than Richard B. Spencer could ever dream of being.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, free speech Tagged With: CJ Werleman, Richard B. Spencer


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Terry says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:06 pm

    It would be poetic justice if (my opinion) some lefty; or Neo-nazi or anyone (other that a true conservative and/or a Trump supporter/deplorable- who disagrees with Trump on some or even many issues, but still feels and felt best person) would punch out Welerman, Robert Spencer; NY Times writers, etc.

    And, if the punches were fatal, probably no loss to humanity. AND AN IMPROVEMENT TO THE GENE POOL.

    • Terry says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 5:33 pm

      Sorry for the error- saying Robert Spencer, I MEANT THE OTHER SPENCER (RICHARD). MY APOLOGIES.

  2. Terry says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:07 pm

    But, aren’t atheists ALSO ON THE MUSLIM HIT LIST?

    I know of (admittedly, not on expert on the topic) of a corresponding Jewish or Christian hit list-for atheists.

    • JawsV says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 6:03 pm

      ALL non-Muslims are on the Islam Hit List. Werleman is one of those crocodile-appeasing dhimmis.

      • cjk says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 8:11 pm

        Don’t kid yourself. When the time comes people with his principles will be bowing to Allah (Satan) in a heartbeat. He knows he has nothing to fear.

    • JIMJFOX says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 9:25 am

      True. Unfortunately, atheists do NOT have the ‘People of the Book’ [Christians, Jews] choice of conversion of dhimmitude, only death. This obnoxious Islamic apologist doesn’t sound much like an atheist, either– Book Descriptions
      The New Atheist Threat is a devastating examination of the evangelical atheist movement. CJ Werleman, a journalist and former New Atheist, reveals how the muscular and combative atheism championed by Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and the late Christopher Hitchens has morphed into a full throated cult that not only threatens secular and democratic values, but also a civil, pluralistic society. Werleman demonstrates how, instead of championing empirical evidence and reason, today’s New Atheists promote white supremacy, anti-Muslim bigotry, secular fundamentalism…

  3. no_one says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:08 pm

    The left is becoming more fascist every day. They are too blinded by hatred to realize this. Those who hold signs “Love trumps hate” are actually big haters. Left is going crazy. I know christian women that went marching with abortion supporters. And they consider themselves Christian, because they go to church every week.

    • Sovereign Man says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 4:45 pm

      There is no “left” and “right.” There are totalitarians, communists, statists, lunatics, whatever you want to call them, of varying degrees of evil and ignorance, and then there are those who wish to live peaceful, productive lives, and leave everyone else alone. Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, the wild animals rioting across America, and Werleman are all of the the same stripe – stupid and evil.

      • JIMJFOX says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 9:14 am

        The group classification you need is “Psychopaths”– whatever other description also applies.
        And they come from ALL sectors, religious and non-religious.

      • Darmanad says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 9:22 am

        Amen.
        Robert Spencer’s expertise is in all matters Islam. He is a witty and prolific writer. I enjoy and learn from reading this blog. However, when he veers into politics he tends to have tunnel vision – all analyses are through heavily colored islam glasses. One self-defeating result of this near-sightedness is the tautologic definition of leftist, liberal, progressive, leftard, etc.alwaus used here.
        The definition is always premised on one’s attitude toward Islam. If you don’t demonstrate sufficient criticism of Islam, you are ipso fact, a leftist – without regard to your philosophy about economics, social and political freedom, or even other psuedo-important issues like gay rights, abortion and the death penalty.
        I maintain that the result of this unwarranted demonization of the “left” (incl those denominated as progressive or liberal) is self-defeating because it alienates many on the left of the political spectrum who are, in fact, allied with Mr Spencer’s views on Islam, but are turned off by the largely ignorant, ill-defined left bashing. Hey, there are plenty of right wingers who give a pass to Islam despite its inherent violation of basic human and civil rights. And that is what it is all about…human and civil rights and the right to live outside a supremacist theocracy. It is not about a false left/right dichotomy, much less my god versus your god.

    • balafama says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 6:10 pm

      the prolife group was excluded from the womens march as they said prolife was anti women . some still held up signs though saying they were pro preborn feminists. i however disagree with u that a christian should not be in the march ,being there does not mean one agrees with everything the march stands for .what has immigration directly ,got to do with christianity or child welfare or anti rape which were all issues some women marched for .

  4. cs says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:08 pm

    I loath that Richard Spencer guy, but would not condone to punch him, he was not attacking any one at that point.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 24, 2017 at 7:37 pm

      Agreed, cs.

  5. davej says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:23 pm

    Once it’s OK to punch members of one group then the violence can spread. Inhibiting free speech and violence or the threat of violence are the tactics of Islam.

    Truth and mockery are the best weapons against any dogma.

  6. DFD says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:57 pm

    You can attack everybody once you call them Nazi (on various web sites that simply means German), Islamophobe, Racists etc.

    Here is a typical American originated Nazi, she made a video titled: “Make Germany Great Again”. The lady wanted originally to call her video: “Make Germany White Again”. Oh Dear. Well, She gave her reasons why she didn’t.

    Just have a look at her and her video – disgusting, those Nazis… https://youtu.be/sHoG3KStuzc

    • Demsci says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 9:04 am

      DFD, I can only assume that YOU were being sarcastic above.

      You linked to Tree of Logic.

      A fantastic counterjihadist blogging woman. As my link will show.

      • DFD says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 12:41 pm

        Demsci says: “DFD, I can only assume that YOU were being sarcastic above…”

        Indeed so, indeed so!
        ================

        And thank you for recognizing that. You said further: “….A fantastic counterjihadist blogging woman…”

        How wholeheartedly I agree. She is truly a fantastic counterjihadist, who knows, some readers of JW may actually have a look at her site. Though, I wouldn’t bet on it. Of course, if it were about Hitler and those evil Germans who planned, and are fully responsible for the Islamization of Europe… Followed by the rest of the Europeans who, of course, get what they deserve…

  7. somehistory says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:58 pm

    Another word for punching someone is assault…a crime that should be punished by jail time.

    I have to disagree with one small bit: ” immortal classic.” His book will be chucked right into Gehenna with all of the rest of the garbage being spouted as knowledge and which is mocking our Creator. Gehenna, as Christians know from what Jesus said, is certain destruction from which there is no reversal.

    • JawsV says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 6:06 pm

      Robert was being sarcastic.

  8. John C. Barile says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 5:22 pm

    Robert, I admire you enough that I would take a punch for you. That doesn’t make you my Fuehrer, though, and I wouldn’t join you in a bunker in Berlin!

    NOTICE TO ALL: If anyone posting on this blog links to a neo-Nazi source such as the “New Observer” or, worse still, “fuehrerious88 blogspot” or the like, in support or agreement with the same–well, then, I promise you, I’ll call you out, I’ll raise an unholy fuss, and I’ll implore The Management here boot you out.

    JCB

    • cjk says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 8:18 pm

      Mighty Leftist of you. People like me don’t need nor want your censorship. I am able to read and decide what is said on my own. I would also like to hear exactly what people I disagree with think in order to know my enemy. I also am against blocking Mohammedan supremiscists at this site for the same reason.

      • John C. Barile says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:23 pm

        You have a point–but consider that this is a private website of opinions, and that, over the course of years, since Jihad Watch began in 2005, there have been attempts to discredit Robert Spencer by spurious postings by CAIR operatives that have called for indiscriminate violence against Muslims and calls for genocide against them–planted here so that screen shot of such would show–falsely–Robert’s bigotry and incitement to violence. There are also thoughtless people who drop in here who accomplish the same, though they don’t realize it. And then there really are persons whose only purpose here is to enlist our concerns–to co-opt them–to serve their own racist or neo-Nazi agendas. Jihad Watch is here for the express purpose of exposing and countering jihad ideology and its wellspring in Islamic texts and teaching–it follows, then, that the proprietors of this site have the right to protect those ends by monitoring and editing–yes, policing–this website.

        Only just today, a poster on another comments thread here said that “we must destroy every Muslim” and that there can be no peace as long as “there is a Muslim breathing.” And that post is gone now, deleted–gee, I wonder why?

        • marc says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:44 pm

          @cjk, I admin here, I do that deleting and banning, we would never give oxygen to neo nazis, or anyone who thinks genocide is a solution. Not to bright either, they just don’t see that islam is not a race, it’s a belief system similar to their own.

          @John C. Barile awesome, I couldn’t have put it better myself, if you see let me know, hard to tell its a nazi or leftist infiltrator looking for screen grabs, no matter, they all get treated the same.

          @Anyone else, If you see call for violence or genocide here, ping me using the contact me button on the right.

        • Achmed says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 1:50 am

          Isn’t that sweet .. the little snowflake ATTEMPTS (special emphasis added) to give credence to its censorship .. the GREAT arbiter.

          Simply hilarious.

          Ban ALL links .. if that’s what concerns the owners of this website, that is the easy solution to the problem. However, should it not be left to them as opposed to some radical left-wing regressive?

          Don’t melt, little snowflake, don’t melt.

        • Achmed says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 1:59 am

          Hi, marc. Would it not make more sense to simply ban links? Then, whenever some SJW snowflake becomes upset .. there would be one less reason for them to melt.

          You as admin … you should decide. However, with the volume of comments make, some days, on this site … it must prove next to impossible to run them all down.

          Why upset some snowflake, have them squeal and cry … just cut out that one reason. Only the owner, and their designees should be the judge(s). Don’t give snowflakes on a power trip something for which to whine.

          Just ban links.

        • marc says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 2:39 am

          @Achmed, two things there, people often share good links, banning all links as some forums do is not an option, and I don’t mind the work, it’s worth it. We just don’t want neo nazis here at all, we do allow the occasional islamic evangelist and apologist here, but that is to allow debate on the subject of JihadWatch.
          Anyone seen as taking subjects off topic / trolling risks banning, just good housekeeping. I really don’t give two shakes over SJWs, infact they are the least of my concern.
          and yes, 1.5 million good comments in the last 10 years is an awful lot of comments, I haven’t been keeping track, but that’s only about 10%, with 90% deleted, mostly by automated spam / abuse systems.

        • John C. Barile says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 11:09 am

          Say what you want, Achmed (BTW, how’s that clock thing of yours working?)–call me an SJW–I’m not–a snowflake and such–and show yourself to be the snide, unreasoning twit that you are

          Never mind how pompous and contentious i come across. I know that what I say has to be said. My concern is for the credibility and effectiveness of the counter-jihad movement.

          I have been on the comments scene here for quite a long time, and I know that Robert Spencer himself put out the call for us, his readers, to help Jihad Watch keep house, and cautioning us to mind the house rules. Remember that, Achmed.

        • John C. Barile says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 11:24 am

          Does anyone in his right mind have to spout genocidal or racist drivel–and think he is furthering our cause? Or to call for indiscriminate violence or collective punishment to be meted out to enemies real, imagined, or simply misinformed? Genocide is a crime in any case–not just when it’s done “for Allah and his religion–but always and everywhere. And I don’t just blindly equate population transfers in wartime with genocide–I mean wholesale murder. Does anyone here need that to be explained to him or her?

          It’s better to be thought a tender, fragile snowflake than to be a brainless blowhard.

        • cjk says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 7:26 pm

          Wow and all this time I thought this was a site about freedom and liberty where intelligent individuals are allowed to make up their own minds.
          Very disappointing.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 7:57 pm

          Achmed wrote:

          Isn’t that sweet .. the little snowflake ATTEMPTS (special emphasis added) to give credence to its censorship .. the GREAT arbiter.

          Simply hilarious.

          Ban ALL links .. if that’s what concerns the owners of this website, that is the easy solution to the problem. However, should it not be left to them as opposed to some radical left-wing regressive?

          Don’t melt, little snowflake, don’t melt.
          …………………………..

          One is not being a “snowflake” for believing that certain things–such as links to neo-Nazi sites–misrepresent and denigrate Jihad Watch.

          This is Robert Spencer’s site–he doesn’t have to give any individual or any particular point of view a platform. He–or his admin Marc–attending to such is not censorship.

          He has often defended the right of freedom of speech–but that does not mean that that right is unlimited at Jihad Watch.

          I would not expect *you* to host neo-Nazis, Communists, Jihadists or anyone else you vehemently disagree with in your own living room.

          More:

          Hi, marc. Would it not make more sense to simply ban links? Then, whenever some SJW snowflake becomes upset .. there would be one less reason for them to melt.
          …………………………..

          Most of us have very much benefited from reading or viewing links posted here–I know I have.

          More:

          You as admin … you should decide. However, with the volume of comments make, some days, on this site … it must prove next to impossible to run them all down.
          …………………………..

          And that is part of the reason that Robert and Marc rely on posters to notify them if someone is posting genocidal, threatening, or profane material here.

          But these are only suggestions–Robert and Marc certainly do not respond to all requests for comments to be removed or posters to be banned.

          More:

          Why upset some snowflake, have them squeal and cry … just cut out that one reason. Only the owner, and their designees should be the judge(s). Don’t give snowflakes on a power trip something for which to whine.

          Just ban links.squeal and cry … just cut out that one reason. Only the owner, and their designees should be the judge(s). Don’t give snowflakes on a power trip something for which to whine.

          Just ban links.
          …………………………..

          The idea that this is just about links is ridiculous. One can write posts glowingly quoting Hitler or Stalin or screaming for the blood of Infidels–these are not all accomplished though posting links.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 8:00 pm

          cjk wrote:

          Wow and all this time I thought this was a site about freedom and liberty where intelligent individuals are allowed to make up their own minds.
          Very disappointing.
          …………………………..

          Of course it is–but that does not mean Robert Spencer is hence obligated to turn Jihad Watch into a platform for Stormfront or the Islamic State.

        • cjk says

          Jan 26, 2017 at 7:25 am

          Ridiculous strawman argument. No this site isn’t as free as I thought. I guess the snowflakes here need to have their ears protected by marcy.

      • PRCS says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:41 pm

        Precisely.

        I continue to hope that–one day–every wannabe jihadist will be allowed to publicly tell our fellow citizens about Islam as THEY understand it–after the arrest, of course–rather than the excuses Muslim apologists (like the Philadelphia mayor for example) make for their behavior.

    • Achmed says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 1:45 am

      Then, call the management and “implore them to boot …” So, now some SJW Snowflake is the arbiter of what is, or is not, acceptable to post links?

      Rather than give into some radical leftist, regressive, SJW Snowflake .. ban ALL links … Why should some leftist snowflake be the arbiter?

      TOO funny … simply hilarious!

      • marc says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 2:06 am

        @Achmed, no, we have not and will never be giving oxygen to neo nazis, if that is an issue for you, you know the way out.

        • Achmed says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 9:54 am

          Greeting, Marc. First, the purpose of my response, to the original comment, had nothing to do with banning links to Nazi propaganda. Rather, it was in response to someone threatening to “tattle” … Another commenter that decides to make themselves the arbiter of links

          Some links may be offensive to the snowflake in question. Other links may be exceedingly offensive to me … and others may offend the sensibilities of others.

          Therefore, when some radical leftist regressive threatens to tattle … “Watch out .. if I don’t agree … I’m going to tell the teacher …” Was simply TOO funny … Absolutely hilarious.

          Any links that the owners of this website, or their appointed designees fine offensive SHOULD be deleted. That is the purview of ownership.

          The nice little SJW’s threats to tattle .. it’s simply a matter of amusement. Almost as much fun as laughing at mohammedans and islamophilieacs..

        • John C. Barile says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 11:34 am

          Read my responses above.

          I explain as clearly as i can what my motivations are.

          This isn’t a schoolroom, and I’m not interested in lording it over anyone.

          I’ll stop being a pompous, overbearing priss when you cease to be a snide, sullen snipe.

        • John C. Barile says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 11:39 am

          I’m glad that I really do amuse you, “Achmed.” Say, do you have the GUTS to use your real name?

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 24, 2017 at 9:15 pm

        Good posts, Marc and John.

        • John C. Barile says

          Jan 28, 2017 at 12:05 pm

          You know how much I value affirmation from you, GI.

    • TERRY says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 6:11 pm

      What (I have seen and nobody I know knows the emanings) of

      88 (re. Nazis)

      and SJW

      • Ecosse1314 says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 7:06 pm

        Is it not the eighth letter of the alphabet and thus stands for HH…..i.e. Heil Hitler. ….and no I am just explaining not declaiming.

        • terry says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 9:05 pm

          Thank you.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 24, 2017 at 9:40 pm

        And “SJW” is “social justice warrior”, Terry–mostly Leftists like the “Occupy” Movement. Using the term to describe those here at Jihad Watch is pretty ridiculous.

        • Terry says

          Jan 28, 2017 at 3:57 pm

          Thank you

  9. pdxnag says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 5:31 pm

    An atheist would reject Islam too, not support it’s call for violent totalitarian supremacy to implement koran 9:29.

    This guy CJ Werleman is just nuts, as if he tripped on his own feet and landed on his head. Hitler was allied with the run-of-the-mill Islamic totalitarians to kill the Jews rather than just expel them. Pity is all that one can offer him.

  10. Vic says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 5:33 pm

    We used to be able to hear out different points of view and speak out for or against them without wanting to punch somebody in the face or want to bomb the WH. It was called a DEBATE. It was called TOLERANCE. We also used to study American and World History, study our Constitution and the Rule of Law. We learned about equality, freedom, liberty, the pursuit of happiness… Including delineating our rights and when we were transgressing on someone else’s rights. Let’s be diligent in pursuing TRUTH.
    Seems like the more we are “connected”, the more anonymous and distant we become. We encounter people who can’t debate with a lucid, well-reasoned thought or two, so they resort to calling people vulgar and slanderous names. Does disappointment and anger give us the right to insult and outright threaten the other person? What happened to the Golden Rule?
    Grow up people. Act like responsible adults.

    • Terry says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 5:42 pm

      Vic– the left cannot act like responsible adults.

      There was (off now, will be resumed with different person in charge ) a WSJ blog BEST OF THE WEB.

      Some time back, not sure how long ago, a psychologist (or maybe a sociologist, or maybe both- cannot recall exactly) did a study of liberals and conservatives. Comparing them.

      RESULTS: Conservatives would LISTEN TO and often rejoinders to liberal arguments. But, not change their views.

      Liberals would not listen to the opposing views.

      The difference-conservatives would listen, and say why they beleive why they beleive,. Liberals- (like Obama-my way or the highway-you are wrong).

      By the way, in the recent Presidential debates- while still more or less fresh.

      THEY WERE NOT DEBATES. THEY WERE -BASICALLY QUESTION AND ANSWER- WITH DIFFERENT QUESTIONS ( I will ignore Hillary Clinton getting the questions for one of the debates in advance, and being pissed when asked a question not on her cheat sheet).

      While Donald Trump was asked if he would accept the results of the election-Clinton was not. BUT SHE DID PONTIFICATE .

  11. gravenimage says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 5:42 pm

    Atheist Islamic apologist CJ Werleman calls for violence against his political opponents (and Robert Spencer)
    ………………………..

    Damn barbarian.

  12. JawsV says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 6:01 pm

    Was this Werleman character dropped on his head as a kid?

    • Phil Copson says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 6:34 pm

      Dunno – best to be sure and do it now…….

      • PRCS says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:43 pm

        Heh!

      • Demsci says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 1:26 pm

        Nooooo!!!

        That was his moral low mistake, it should not be ours!

        But I laughed heartily for your humor

  13. LH says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 6:07 pm

    When the Godless Left and the Satanic Islam merges you know you have arrived at the end times start. Got Jesus in faith alone (no works required) because you will need Him! We pray for the enemies of the Cross.

  14. RationalVoice says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 6:45 pm

    You can’t be an Atheist and Islamic apologist. That is a contradiction in terms. You have to be a rationalist though ,otherwise you are just confused or maybe stupid !!

  15. vlparker says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 7:00 pm

    The left is psychotic.

    • Shmooviyet says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 2:34 am

      @vlparker: Thumbs up; five stars.
      True hatred is deep in their bones; I’ve seen it too often– in this country and elsewhere– to believe anything else.
      Must be a miserable existence, searching for “racism” in anyone who holds differing opinions, thoughts, ideology. Guess that misery has to have some outlet, like clogged plumbing.

  16. Kepha says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 7:42 pm

    Being what might be called a “race traitor” by someone who believes there’s a reality to our arbitrary division into Caucasoid, Mongloid, and Negroid, Uncle Kepha ddoes not support Richard Spencer or any white supremacist (or black or yellow supremacist, for that matter). However, I’m going to stick my neck out and say that what he says is protected speech under the First Amendment, and he has a right to be on the street as much as any other American. It is the self-professed “anti-fascists” in this one who are using Brown Shirt tactics.

    Also, I am sick and tired over all this screaming of “racists!” every time the Left loses an election. I lived in flyover country for years, and white people whom I know to be Trump supporters were kindly, decent, and welcoming enough to my not-all-white family. I’ve also traveled enough and lived abroad enough, including places where I was clearly an outsider, to know that everyone’s amour propre is not necessarily racism–and I’ve seen plenty of other people’s love of their own that was nonetheless very open to respectful outsiders.

    Last of all, suppose some conservative had grabbed Angela Davis by her Afro and slapped her a few times on the face and called her a !!@!@*&@##& Commie punk, or something like that? I’m sure the media would be abuzz with righteous indignation and there’d be a prosecution for a hate crime.

    What I see with Werleman and people like him is the recycling of hackneyed cliches, perhaps evidence that the Left remains intellectually and morally bankrupt decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall.

    I don’t call for violence against Muslims regardless of the actual threats they pose. But I don’t believe in hiding from the glaring fact that much of the Islamic world wishes us ill, has deep-seated theological reasons for it, acts on it, and so far, seems to be winning Islam’s internal Battle of the Texts.

    • Achmed says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 10:10 am

      I lived in Japan and The Republic of Korea, for many years. In both nations, I found them to be warm and respectful people. I have many decades long friendships from both nations.

      In Japan, when they found that I was not an English teacher, rather that I was working with Shimizu on their Saipan projects … I was well accepted. After meeting some of those “English teachers” and seeing their actions and how they lived … I can see why they consider them to be eta.

      In Korea, practically the same .. once they found out that I was not “GI” or some “English teacher” working at a Hakwon … I rose to the level of being a human being … accepted, welcomed, and befriended. I truly treasure my years, working for the Daesang Group and Samsung Heavy … wonderful, open, intelligent, and industrious people.

      Of course, I was different .. and I realized that … whether gaijin or yangnum … No big deal.

      My year and one half, in the Czech Republic … I did not find them nearly as welcoming as those of another race (Japan and Korea) were to me.

      • Kepha says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 9:06 pm

        In Taiwan, I was an English teacher, but I also behaved myself.

  17. Barry Donnelly says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 9:20 pm

    Nothing to fear Robert ! This little Lefty Lady Love Bug couldn’t beat the dung out of her underwear ! Isn’t Slapping usually a Female act of Aggression ?

  18. umbra says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 10:51 pm

    Would this be the same cj werleman, plagiarist extraordinaire?

  19. Rudolf says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 11:01 pm

    There are those that seek enslavement. CJ whatever the f**k is one of them

  20. marc says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 11:13 pm

    The hard left are getting very mouthy and violent recently, Trump’s election has been quite a shock to them, this yesterday where a leftist thug Dion Bews punched a female reporter in the face.
    https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/01/thug-punches-rebel-media/

    The neo-nazi / national socialist lot are feeling left out, seems they misunderstood Trump biggly (not too bright, for the hundredth time dummkopfs, islam is not a race).

    • Achmed says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 10:23 am

      I’d be willing to toss some coin to up that reward.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 24, 2017 at 9:48 pm

      *Appalling*, Marc–thanks for the link.

      That a man at a women’s march is allowed to hit a non-violent woman in the face for saying something he doesn’t like–and that this is condoned by other women in the crowd–is the height of insanity.

      • Phil Copson says

        Jan 25, 2017 at 6:03 am

        These people get all their ideas from the media, not from real life, and therefore anything that happens in real life is less important – and less recognisable – to them than their theories.

        If they read that Donald Trump had punched a woman and what a terrible thing that was, they would experience feelings of anger and indignation.

        But to see a woman being punched in the face in real life, without a commentary to tell them what to think, simply doesn’t elicit any reaction, beyond “You’re not part of our group, so we don’t care.”

        Look at the pallid, peering, slack, uncomprehending faces on so many young SJWs – they simply don’t understand that reality exists quite independently of their opinions and attitudes.

  21. Ver Auger says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 3:43 am

    Dear Robert Spencer,
    It is indeed unfortunate that your name sounds similar to that of neo-nazi Richard Spencer. You are clearly not any kind of nazi: you do not advocate violence on racial, political or ethnic lines, nor do you preach hatred of any kind of people of any religion per se. I have been reading your e-newsletter at bedtime (when it arrives) for many months, and, while it has not helped my sleep any, what I have learned may save my life someday, and maybe has already. If a religion seeks to be feared, and its adherents act accordingly, they should expect that they will be feared.. Why do they object to receiving exactly what they demand – phobos (fear)? I fear large tigers that bite off people’s heads, but I do not hate them.

  22. Angemon says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 5:34 am

    I expect the likes of Werleman to grow increasingly shrieker and more violent as their ideological base slips into oblivion. Their time in power is over and they won’t take it quietly. It’s the same kind of idiocy that clamoured for more power to Obama while never thinking that the powers weren’t going to Obama himself but to the office he held for 8 years, oblivious to the possibility that someone ideologically “diverse” might win an election someday. And why wouldn’t the likes of Werleman be violent (not Werleman himself, though, because evil needs to keep a civilized facade)? I’ve seen Trump being presented as the incarnation of all the bogeymen of identity politics: he’s been consistently and insistently presented – and not just in American media, also in European media outlets – as a “racist”, “bigot”, “misogynist”, “islamophobe”, “homophobe”, etc., who is going to take away the civil rights of women and minorities. Trump’s opponents and the media whipped morons who believe that into a frenzy, so of course their last resort is violence. And the irony here is that the barbarians who are now rioting on the streets and attacking people whose ideas they don’t like, and the ones who defend their actions, are the people who before the election were smugly saying things like “if Trump wins, Hillary’s supporters will be sad but if Hillary wins, Trump supporters will riot”. These knaves are too stupid to realize – or maybe expect other not – that they are the architects of their own “oppression”. They break s*** on the streets and attack people, so law enforcement has no choice but to do the lawful, moral thing: go after them, which they’ll present as “fascist oppression” or something like that.

    • Phil Copson says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 6:27 am

      “….as their ideological base slips into oblivion. Their time in power is over….”

      Wishful thinking – the Left-wing have been making their “long march” through the corridors of power for many years, and simply don’t know any other way of thinking.

      Expect four years of hate-filled shrieking, not acceptance that other people’s ideas work better.

      Because what works and what doesn’t isn’t the point for Marxists, (or for any other type of totalitarian); the point is take power, enforce your own ideas, punish those who disagree with you, and to hell with the consequences, because you and your clique will not be affected by them.

      Indeed, the worse the consequences, the better so far as the Marxists and the Merkels are concerned; an impoverished, ignorant underclass is far too busy trying to survive to spare the time and resources to question their feudal overlords.

      • Ritchie Stirling says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 9:14 am

        You just described Trump’s campaign platform;

        “Because what works and what doesn’t isn’t the point for Marxists, (or for any other type of totalitarian); the point is take power, enforce your own ideas, punish those who disagree with you, and to hell with the consequences, because you and your clique will not be affected by them.”
        Is that irony or stupidity on your part?

        • Phil Copson says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 6:12 pm

          If you think very, very hard, you may just about spot that Donald Trump is not a totalitarian out to destroy democracy, or to impoverish or imprison those who didn’t vote for him.

          You feel safe attacking conservatives and accusing them of being racists / bigots / fascists / xenophobes – or whatever else the latest hate-word is in your campus rag – precisely because you know that they’re not.

          And you daren’t do anything but praise Marxist dictators, Third World tyrants, and insane Islamists as being anything other than wonderful, well-meaning, and peaceful, for exactly the same reason.

          You want to see stupid – look in a mirror.

    • TERRY says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 6:20 pm

      Back right after the election, someone asked (not sure if it was in Portland Oregon in Cal) the rrioters if they voted for Clinton.

      Most of thsoe who answered not only did not vote, had not even registeredt.

      Trump, ( rhetorically, I guess) asked of the bitches marching- did they vote?

      The Democrap party is disolving-or seems to be-on the locall level. See my comments ( figures from google)- re: counties, etc.

  23. Jedothek says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 10:58 am

    I haven’t read Werleman’s books, but my diagnosis of him is extended adolescence. I do not mean to excuse his odious statements, but I think he has not thought through the doctrine that one should hit people whose views one dislikes . The question now is: can anything induce him to grow up and adopt responsible rather than contrarian positions?

    • TERRY says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 6:24 pm

      I think that he will try and hit someone, with whose views he disagrees. And that person will wipe the floor with him.

      Years back, my brother had a friend, who was of French descent. He was about 5’6″ tall and weighed maybe 90 pounds.

      He was attacked by 3 muggers-all over 6′ tall, all 200or mor epounds.

      The result- three 6′ men with fractured skulls; broken limbs and assorted injuries. My brother’s friend? he had scraped nuckles.

      (He was a black belt in 2 different martial arts, and had been an instructor in the same in the Army;)

      Same could happen to these creeps.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 24, 2017 at 9:53 pm

        Good for your brother’s friend, Terry!

  24. Atheist Kaffur says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 12:24 pm

    Mr.Werleman is an atheist kiss ass. I have a message for Mr. Werleman, No! Islam is not a race but a religion.. 2) Religions are are not all the same. I dislike them all especially Islam. 3) As an atheist I’m sure you’re a lefty because I’m one but I don’t kiss any Muslim ass or support any of their nonsense. 3) All lefties that made alliances with Islam ended up dead. Check out what happen in Iran 1979.

  25. Craig says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 1:56 pm

    I thought I recognized that name. CJ has been a Jew-hating bigot for years now. He’s close with Max Blumenfail too. Promoting fake news before it was called fake news:
    http://www.israellycool.com/2015/12/27/israel-hating-idiots-lie-again/

    • TERRY says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 6:26 pm

      Craig– Max Blumenthal IS THE SON OF SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL, one of Hillary Clintn’s top advisors.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Infidel on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.