• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Australia: Eight Muslims attack woman, her husband fights them off

Jan 4, 2017 12:01 pm By Robert Spencer

“Mr Tyrrell claimed the Muslim man took offence to being told what to do by a woman and unleashed a tirade of abuse at her, but the fact that she ignored him only enraged him even more….’At that point five more joined the fight, one punching my wife…'” One of the Muslims said to Liana Tyrrell: “Your husband needs to teach you a lesson.”

This is the clash of civilizations in a nutshell. Is Australia really enriched by admitting large numbers of people who believe that women who tell men in any circumstances what to do should be rewarded with violence, and their husbands should “teach them a lesson”? How? And this is no isolated case: since these attitudes are founded on the Qur’an, which tells men to beat women from whom they fear disobedience (4:34), there will be many more such cases.

“Iraq war veteran who fought off EIGHT Muslim men after they attacked his wife, called her a ‘white s**t’ and punched her in the face says he would ‘do it all again in a heartbeat,'” by John Carney, Daily Mail Australia, January 2, 2017 (thanks to Kenneth):

A retired Iraq war veteran who fought off eight Muslim men after they attacked his wife has tried to put the record straight on what exactly happened that day.

Kyle Tyrrell, 48, had an altercation with fishermen on Victoria’s Surf Coast a year ago while standing up for his wife Liana.

Mr Tyrrell claimed that Liana was punched in the face at the Cosy Corner beach, in Torquay, after one of the men put a crab pot in the water and she told him the area was a marine sanctuary and fishing was banned.

In the fight that took place on Sunday, January 24, 2016, Mr Tyrrell suffered minor injuries, while at least one of the fishermen was taken to hospital. No charges were laid.

The retired lieutenant-colonel claimed that the attack was racially and culturally motivated after his wife was called a white sl** and a white w***e by the men.

However criticism that he has received about the incident on Facebook persuaded him to set the record straight on the incident. He confirmed that the men were Muslim and said he would ‘do it again in a heartbeat’.

His response was published on the Stand Up For Australia – Melbourne Facebook page, where he argued he had no other option but to fight.

Mr Tyrrell claimed the Muslim man took offence to being told what to do by a woman and unleashed a tirade of abuse at her, but the fact that she ignored him only enraged him even more.

‘His mates got close to me and then he made a run for my wife, that’s when I ran at him, he threw a punch which I ducked and the fight started. At no time could either my wife, daughter or I safely walk away,’ Mr Tyrrell wrote.

‘At that point five more joined the fight, one punching my wife as she attempted to get our daughter up the beach.’

At one stage one of the men said to Mr [sic] Terrell: ‘Your husband needs to teach you a lesson.’

‘I would do the same thing again in a heartbeat, in fact I would do the same thing for any woman I saw in that situation not just my wife,’ he concluded the Facebook post….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Australia, Featured, Jihadist intimidation and thuggery Tagged With: Kyle Tyrrell, Liana Tyrrell


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Atheist Kaffur says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 12:16 pm

    Finally western men are finding their testosterone. One against 8 only shows how cowardly they are and that western men must stand together.

    • Stan Lee says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 12:45 pm

      You’re right! According to the description, one of them took umbrage at being advised of a simple fact offered to keep a marine sanctuary intact. But, only when seven of the offender’s Muslim brethren join him did he muster his ego enough to “take a run” at Mrs. Tyrrell.
      They are a breed of cowards, foisted upon us by the breed of political cowards in our midst,

      • mortimer says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 1:28 pm

        Like Lt Col Tyrrell, we should all start telling Muslims, ‘Conform, comply and fit in with Western civilization or leave and we won’t miss you.’

        • mortimer says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 2:13 pm

          We should do it with words. He did with defensive martial arts.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 3:13 pm

          Wow. What a pussy.

          They don’t listen to words; get it? They don’t care what you say. They only care if and when you kick their shitty little asses.

          Man the fuck up, Morty.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 5:49 pm

          mortimer says
          January 4, 2017 at 2:13 pm

          We should do it with words.

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          What? Are you married? Is this seriously how you would *defend* your own wife ..with wordds? At first I thought that you were being sarcstic, but no, you aren’t. Boy if you were my husband muslims would be the least of your problems.

          How THIS man defended his wife’s attackers was **exactly** how a husband should respond—NOT “with words” alone. This is so weak and cowardly that I can’t even believe you suggested this idea. I’m shocked.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 6:38 pm

          mort, if you are married, does your wife know what you would do—if some thug punched her in the face? If so, then I imagine that she will probably want to have a few choice “words” with you! Just stay home mort and let the “real men” defend your wife …

        • Byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 6:50 pm

          Come on guys, isn’t Mortimer a long-standing member of this website? You shouldn’t be so quick to disrespect.

          I imagine he is referring to the actual solution to the religions presence in the West. not small incidents like this one. Note that he said we should talk like the man in this story-are you going to call that man a coward too?

          Mortimer is correct. We can solve this with words-words and a big stick, as one American president once said.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:12 pm

          “Byzantium1683” has his priorities completely screwed up …

          What matters is what mortimer wrote, today, and he deserves the feedback that he’s getting.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:18 pm

          “Mortimer is correct. We can solve this with words-words and a big stick, as one American president once said.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          As an offensive strategy, Roosevelt was referring to foreign policy–NOT to an immediate attack of when your wife has been punched in the face!

          Good grief, grow a brain.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:20 pm

          Byz, you’re as delusional and as much a pussy as Mortimer. Nobody is a “member” of this site so playing that card to get Mortimer some wiggle room is ridiculous.

          I’ve studied these Muslim motherfuckers and their battle tactics for the last 15 years now and can tell you the only thing they understand is maximum force of violence: a slap won’t do, you have to kick ’em in the balls then stomp on their throats. Any conversation they engage in with their enemy is merely to allow them, the Muslims, time to fortify their positions and to prepare for further attacks.

          Mortimer is wrong and so are you. You are both fools so shut the fuck up.

        • Gary Daniels says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:46 pm

          Square pegs will never fit properly in round holes.

        • Byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:08 pm

          No, you grow a brain.

          “Like Lt Col Tyrrell, we should all start telling Muslims”

          What fucking part of this statement screams “tryell was wrong to fight back” To you? He WAS NOT speaking of that particular fight, but of what we must do to stop Islam as a whole. Learn to read.

          Of course the only choice was to beat up those little shits, and I’m glad he did it, but the war will be won by words.

          As to membership, all I’m saying is he has an impressive record of speaking and knowing the truth. All these pussies you hate can vote, and Robert knows we must try and talk.

          I’m sure I know more about Muslims, even if I don’t we actually both agree about the ultimate solution. I’m simply saying you misunderstood Mortimer, and hell, now me.

          You know what happened 200 years ago? Westerners like America fought Muslim pirates, then TALKED. And it worked too, until leftists forgot what we fought for and gave them power again.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:56 pm

          Byzantium1683 wrote:

          You know what happened 200 years ago? Westerners like America fought Muslim pirates, then TALKED. And it worked too, until leftists forgot what we fought for and gave them power again.

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Aw, but this particular headline is NOT discussing *peace talks*, you nincompoop …

          Of course conversations are needed and important in hoping to reach a peaceful outcome, but that isn’t what’s primarily being discussed on this thread, and that ISN’T what mortimer was responding to, either.

          Focus McFly …FOCUS!

          The primary focus on this thread is about a husband defending his wife when SHE was punched in the face by a mohammedan thug, and this was NOT the time for making nice “with words” and/or *peace talks* …wow can’t you focus on the discussion? Seems you can’t.

        • Byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:09 pm

          Insults insults with no goal, yet YOU miss the point.

          Why do you not understand that Discussions take different turns, especially here.

          Maybe you are right about his later comments, but here he was clearly referring to what we need to do next, unless you are so stupid as to believe we were all there with Mr. Tryell?

          Read this one again. Focus Doc brown…Focus!

          Like Lt Col Tyrrell, we should all start telling Muslims, ‘Conform, comply and fit in with Western civilization or leave and we won’t miss you.’

          The headline is not specifically the topic with his comment. If HE is off-topic, Ok, but dont lie about it champ. And Fighting Islamists is never entirely off-topic on this website, though thats debatable.

          BTW, I actually dont think we can get a totally peaceful compromise, But people like you and “undaunted” are too few to fight offensively ATM. Not only must we do the hard task of convincing the rest of the west, but as Graven mentioned, talking has worked before with muslims. But only once we have kicked the shit of them. We really do agree on that.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:20 pm

          Projection Alert …

          Byzantium1683 wrote:

          “Insults insults with no goal, yet YOU miss the point.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Notice that “Byzantium1683” started with the “insults” and name calling on this thread, but now he’s only pointing to “insults” that HE received? Is he playing the victim? hmm, seems so …

          Nope. Your above comment lacks convincing evidence in support of your claim that mortimer meant anything other than mocking this brave husband. Clearly mortimer was mocking Like Lt Col Tyrrel, and that’s that …but you’re just not seeing it. So quit blaming others for your inability to see the obvious.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:13 pm

          Hmm, Im certainly not the aggressor.

          Don’t critque me like im a muslim and kinda in third person. You arent Graven-image, so don’t even try.

          Anyway, that was a massive lie you just pulled. Everyone can see my first comment was respectful, or in any case I only used insults after you and Undaunted started throwing them like candy.

          maybe he did in other threads, I doubt it, but not here. Right back at you-You project and are blind, like far-leftists. Id like to see YOUR evidence that he intended to insult, but you would just say some crap about how I am the one who should bring it.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:27 pm

          Here is my Evidence.

          “like Lt Col Tyrrell, we should all start telling Muslims, ‘Conform, comply and fit in with Western civilization or leave and we won’t miss you.’”

          Note that he suggested we should EMULATE Tyrrell in something. Very positive account, not insulting. Used proper title as well.

          He says “we should all start tellling muslims”

          He clearly deviates from the event, now moving to what WE should do. Are you champ, so stupid as to think we were there when he beat those little shits? Would explain how he did it, no disrespect intended. Again, talking about the next step, while not actually attacking Tyrell’s in any way.

          ‘Conform, comply and fit in with Western civilization or leave and we won’t miss you.’”

          Justifably anti-muslim tone. He argues that Tryell was “telling” them this.

          Which begs the question. If he says (he did) that Tyrell told them to comply with the law, then it is likely Mortimer meant metaphorically Tyrell talked with his FISTS!

          So when you analyze it, He clearly did not mean to mock, and quite possibly actually supported the beating, as I just realized. Amazing, that there may be a layer of meaning beyond my first read, and way beyond yours (champ) How wrong you appear lol.

          Its impossible, but what is your evidence that he was mocking him?

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:31 pm

          “Byzantium1683” is CLEARLY lying, not me, and I can prove it since *time stamps* don’t lie …

          Below, on this thread, “Byzantium1683” wrote this comment to me BEFORE I replied to him above. And you will notice that he is responding to me, and note that he calls me an “idiot”:

          Byzantium1683 says
          January 4, 2017 at 6:59 pm

          “He may be a whimp, but you are an Idiot.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          So in fact “Byzantium1683” threw the first insult toward me thus proving that he’s lying about ME stating that I told a “massive lie” when clearly I didn’t. Again, time stamps don’t lie, but “Byzantium1683” sure does, and he knows it!

          He’s basing this on what’s written just above these comments, and he’s conveniently hoping no one will notice his first comment to me, which is below this section; but you have to pay attention to the time stamps to see the order of things. The record shows that HE threw the first insult, and the truth is all right there in black ‘n white. Just sayin’ …

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:40 pm

          And then “Byzantium1683” made this bizarre remark:

          “You arent Graven-image, so don’t even try.”

          Huh? What an odd thing to state. Not to mention pointless. I’ve never even *tried* to be like Graven–or anyone else, for that matter.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:57 pm

          First I thought you were lying again. Look at this chronology.

          My first comment on this thread was at 6:50.
          The comment you said first insulted- 6:59.

          You assume much, that I am so callow that I am trying to twist things. In reality, it seems I used the first insult, and I apologize that I mistook it (not lied)

          However, you two were much more insulting, and I was obviously replying to your insult of Mortimer, and you are an idiot (not helping my case) for not understand his post and then heavily attacking him. Consider me insulting you by proxy for him, though that doesn’t make it right, and I don’t think its his nature.

          Anyway, not to detract from my mistake but what about my evidence. You previously said that his comment was super off-topic, that we can’t deviate from the headline, so I am sure you would be totally fine with focusing on the real issue-did he mock Lt.col Tyrell.

          When you read his statement, and read my interpretation, I find it ridiculous that anyone could say he was mocking him, it actually being more positive than even I thought. But I am sure you will find a way to claim he indeed mocked him.

          Note that his broken english statement down there is more ambiguous, but considering his record of not mocking him (so I say) and the way it is worded, that is probably not an insult either. But lets stick to the first one for now, if we do it at all.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:01 pm

          “Huh? What an odd thing to state. Not to mention pointless. I’ve never even *tried* to be like Graven–or anyone else, for that matter.”

          Let me make it a little less bizzare Champ.

          Graven-image has a standard method when she criticizes posters here, and I believe there were similarities with your approach in your own critique of me.

          So, I did not appreciate, not that you care, the way you talked in third person? about me. Also, since this approach is often used on muslims and neo-nazis, well….I REALLY don’t wish to be attacked as if I was some Islamist. I think you can understand that.

          Of course, if thats your style its your style, but thats my reasoning.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:13 pm

          Since “Byzantium1683” doesn’t post very often, I must explain that the third person practice is NOT unique to Graven–not at all.

          In fact, this practice predates Graven. And I have been posting here about 2 years longer than Graven, so this is something that many of us practice, and for a variety of reasons.

          Poor “Byzantium1683” has simply revealed his ignorance on this matter, that’s all. Nothing to see here …

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:26 pm

          so, you simply dodge the question about Mortimers statement, revealing that you have no evidence for it being mocking. You cannot contend with my ironclad analysis (its so obvious), so you don’t bother.

          You do not know how long I have been here, not using this name. Much longer, though not as much as you. “2 years longer than graven” I guess it was justified, but seniority matters now huh?

          Regardless of who started it, its damn demeaning to be treated like a science experiment and a muslim nutjob….but I guess you don’t give a damn if its insulting. Reasonable.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:31 pm

          Comedy gold from the clown “Byzantium1683” who wrote:

          “You cannot contend with my ironclad analysis (its so obvious), so you don’t bother.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Seriously? He claims to have presented “ironclad analysis”? Not only is this amusing and priceless, but it’s a complete LIE. All anyone has to do is read his “ironclad analysis” for themselves …nothing more is needed. Thanks for the laugh you clown.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:42 pm

          More whining from the victim “Byzantium1683” who wrote:

          “Regardless of who started it, its damn demeaning to be treated like a science experiment and a muslim nutjob….but I guess you don’t give a damn if its insulting. Reasonable.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Now the jerk thinks that he’s entitled to be treated with *respect* even though he behaves like a complete ASS? What planet is he from? Jeez “Byzantium1683” can dish it out but he can’t take it. Grow up.

          BTW, not once have I *demanded* that he treat me with respect. I am simply responding to his silly nonsense. Keep ’em coming clown.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:44 pm

          See, ladies and Gentlemen? He refuses to present evidence, as I have done willingly. He admits he was wrong. Just like the media, refusing to defend themselves “because its obvious you clown” Champs hero must be Resa Aslan.

          First of all, Is a lie not told with the knowledge it is false? I truly believe my analysis is good. but regardless of its worth, you provide nothing. NOTHING. You admit you are wrong, as no one can possibly trust the bullshit coming from your mouth. You lose the argument the second you refuse to elucidate your supposedly superior opinion. That right there, is an ironclad rule.

          Futhermore, my analysis is no stretch. It comes directly from what Mortimer said, so “nothing more is needed” as it is so obvious what he meant. Only the metaphor is hard to spot. you and Undaunted have revealed yourself as overly-judgemental clowns. Next time you speak, try not to vomit.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:51 pm

          You really badly want to be an establishment muslim, don’t you champ? Just call others clown all day.

          You say I can’t take it, that I whined, but in that very quote I noted that it was fair game “I guess you don’t give a damn if its insulting. Reasonable”

          Dumbass. you had to put demanded in Asterisks, because I clearly did not demand you treat me respectfully. In the very quote I admitted you didn’t care, no matter what I say.

          You probably come from a asteroid made of shit, since you have insulted me way more. Remember, I very fairly call you an idiot after you freaked out on mortimer, and then you freak out some more. I am sure if we counted it, you were much more insulting dumbass.

          As you can see, Champ continues to lie and Project, also picking tiny details out of entire arguments.

          I will of course act like a ass, when you decided to act like a complete dick…..and I’ve set up a horrible response.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:55 pm

          BTW, mister “champ” mocks my non-existent call for respect, yet I only took umbrage with being treated like a muslim nutjob. Which on this website, should be an understandable annoyance. I also accepted the fact that he may continue as well. Not much else to do.

          Thus, I clearly did not call for a cessation of insults, though this sharing of insults, like the Israeli-palestinian crisis, is only being fueled by his side. I simply wanted to correct them, when they were already unfairly targeting mortimer like the babies they are.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:58 pm

          Bizarre and Ridiculous “Byzantium1683” wrote:

          “See, ladies and Gentlemen? He refuses to present evidence, as I have done willingly. He admits he was wrong. Just like the media, refusing to defend themselves “because its obvious you clown” Champs hero must be Resa Aslan.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          *Epic Fail* from the troll on all points …

          For starters, most here know that I am not a “He”, but a she. Even on this thread this fact has escaped “Byzantium1683’s” attention–so much for his reading comprehension.

          Secondly, the record shows that I did in fact provide evidence, contrary to the clown’s claim, that I didn’t. So now he’s just pulling lies straight out of his arse.

          And then the lil’ diddy at the end–which is nothing but trolling material–where he makes another false claim that my hero must be Resa Aslan.

          One need not wonder anymore *why* I’ve chosen to treat this ass like the troll that he obviously is.

          Get lost troll.

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:11 am

          The immature troll “Byzantium1683” wrote:

          BTW, mister “champ” mocks my non-existent call for respect, yet I only took umbrage with being treated like a muslim nutjob. Which on this website, should be an understandable annoyance.

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Here we have the height of hypocrisy put on display by “Byzantium1683” …

          On the one hand he doesn’t want to be treated like a muslim nutjob–as he claims to be treated–but then on the other hadn that’s exactly how hes treated me. Not that I care, because I don’t. I’m just pointing out his profound hypocrisy because it matters that HE not be treated that way.

          I suppose the troll “Byzantium1683” thinks that he’s just taught me a lesson, when in fact he’s just taught us all a lesson about HIM–hilarious!

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:14 am

          More stupidity from you.

          The record shows evidence for your retarded concept? What evidence? Don’t just say it might exist. I’m sure its horrible anyway, but let people see for themselves.

          Seee, I told you that SHE can’t read. It was obviously not literal when I said your hero was Resa Aslan. Whatever you are, you ain’t muslim. No, it was an analogy, as you use the same retarded concepts and words as him.

          If you can’t comprehend something as simple as that, how can anyone believe you on the topic of mortimers statement?

          You decided to treat me like an troll? When was this decided? Because as I noted you were the first to insult (anybody, if not me) and your insults escalated very quick, as you can’t reliably contain your bullshit.

          In any case, if anyone is a troll, its you. I do not consider those who genuinely believe in their arguments to be a troll. Trolls may believe, but they are just out for “fun”

          Meanwhile, you actually admitted you are just here to insult me. Thus, you are a complete Troll, you projecting bastard.

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:30 am

          “Thus, you are a complete Troll, you projecting bastard.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Perfect. More hypocrisy from the seemingly drunk “Byzantium1683” …

          And he claims that I’m treating him like a “nutjob”? Um, I see him acting like one, don’t you?

          Gosh this is quite entertaining for me, but I think that the troll is about to blow a gasket, so try to calm down troll. Oh, but trolls can’t …

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:34 am

          Oh, is “Byzantium1683” trying to teach me another lesson?

          Hilarious, since the only lesson being taught here is that “Byzantium1683” is in fact a “nutjob” …the very thing he’s trying so hard to hide from the class!

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:41 am

          The Troll “champ” Continues to provide no evidence, thus confirming everything I say.

          If I am a nutjob, then you certainly are one too you piece of shit.

          What Hypocrisy? I am not a troll, and I do not project. Contrast with you, who love it. Such a hypocrite, but such is the projecting troll.

          What class? Are you schizophrenic as well?

          I have hidden nothing, unlike you all my statements are authentic. It all started with your twisted desire to feel good by putting others down after all. (cue champtrolls obsession with weakness, no doubt trying to pin it on me, even though he is the ass)

          Get it, Pin the tail? the Ass? Or is that also beyond your reading level?

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:49 am

          The unhinged and bizarre troll “Byzantium1683” continues to demonstrate his shameful secret, which is not a secret anymore …

          That he is in fact a “nutjob”, the very thing that he protests to being.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:58 am

          The Shameless Champtroll now abandons all pretense of Intelligence and even being the good guy, staking everything on one single point.

          In reality, denying Nutjobness is not my priority. I’m more concerned with how you willfully mischaracterized a faithful counter-jihadiist, derived sexual pleasure from insulting others (no, Im not projecting) and such.

          If I am indeed a nutjob, and I will not pretend I am the MOST normal person (though thank god I’m not you) It is irrelevant, since you are at least as much of a nutjob.

          It is easy to consider. If we are both nutjobs, all things being thus equal, then you are still stupid and ignorant of the things you argue.

          Im going to just go ahead and assume you failed that reading test as well. I would say don’t be so literal, but you actually fail at that too.

          Hey, I just remembered. You subconsciously Admire Muslims, and it shows. You attempted to paint me as a hypocrite. You know what also loves that word? The Quran.

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 1:15 am

          The ridiculous and grotesque “Byzantium1683” isn’t fooling anyone here with his pathetic lies about me.

          The only lesson that this fool has proven is that he’s a pathological liar, and a nasty one at that; and that he isn’t interested in the truth.

          Yep, I’ve had this clowns number from the get-go and he can’t stand it …

          In his *very* first response to me he called me an “idiot”, and that was before I had even responded to him. So that says EVERYTHING about his intentions. Further offerings reveal even uglier intentions. All of which are recorded here.

          This creep is not here for genuine debate. This much is clear.

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 1:20 am

          This bizarre creep “Byzantium1683” is not here for genuine and *HONEST* debate. This much is clear.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 1:35 am

          Ha. Ha. Ha.

          I have done nothing but be interested in the truth. Maybe you want me to self-mutilate like your muslim idols, but when I was wrong I admitted it, I did not lie.

          You know what, I admitted I was probably the first to Insult, but I take that back. my first (also clean) response to you occurred 9 WHOLE MINUTES before the one you now say is first. You can’t keep your story straight you sack of shit.

          And what does it say about your intentions, that you were childish from the get-go. one little “idiot” is nothing to that.

          What is recorded here is that your story is not borne out by facts, and you continue to project since I am the only one interested in debate, as evidenced by your frivolous words mocking the very concept of an intelligent discussion.This much is clear.

          BTW, I know you fail at thinking even literally, as mortimers comment, as evidenced by my description and its obvious meanings, can not be misunderstood even literally, it is so clear.

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 1:44 am

          How low will the egregious and vile “Byzantium1683” go?

          “…I’m more concerned with how you willfully mischaracterized a faithful counter-jihadiist, derived sexual pleasure from insulting others (no, Im not projecting) and such.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Nothing of the sort is true about me, nor did I ever state such filth. But only a sexual deviant like“Byzantium1683” could contrive such a fiction about me …

          And I point this out to show just how low this troll “Byzantium1683” will go in an attempt to smear me? But of course he can’t, since most of you know me very well. All he’s succeeding in doing is revealing just how dark and depraved his soul is. This creep just keeps stating uglier and more perverse things about me by the minute …

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 2:00 am

          The lies just keep coming from the bizarre and cruel “Byzantium1683” …

          And I find it very amusing that this self proclaimed “honest contributor” can’t keep ANY of the facts straight, nor does he admit to being a pathological liar—which is abundantly clear on this thread.

          Oh, and this is terribly amusing:

          “What is recorded here is that your story is not borne out by facts, and you continue to project since I am the only one interested in debate, as evidenced by your frivolous words mocking the very concept of an intelligent discussion.”

          Good Lord. He gives himself undue credit. And I am all for giving credit, where credit is due, but this is beyond absurd–he doesn’t deserve any credit. In fact, patting himself on the back, as he did, is an insult to the readers intelligence.

          Once again the bizarre “Byzantium1683” is caught in ANOTHER lie. We can all see that the *opposite* is true about him here.

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 2:27 am

          The nincompoop “Byzantium1683” wrote:

          “You know what, I admitted I was probably the first to Insult, but I take that back. my first (also clean) response to you occurred 9 WHOLE MINUTES before the one you now say is first. You can’t keep your story straight you sack of shit.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Good gried. The comment you’re referring to–the one written 9 minutes before the one where he called me an “idiot”, was not written DIRECTLY TO ME. I am talking about YOUR FIRST COMMENT DIRECTED TO ME. Good Lord, can’t you read.

          The other comment was not specifically written to me, but you stated, “Come on you guys” …blah, blah, blah.

          Jeez. I made it quite clear that you started things with ME with that first comment DIRECTED AT ME. Sorry for yelling, but this clown is so darn obtuse. And rather than admit to this error, he instead just calls me a liar. How convenient. I didn’t lie. I was referring to the first comment you *directed* at me. Clear enough nincompoop? Good grief you’re incredibly dumb and incredulous, in general, to what I’ve stated. Grow. A. Brain. Learn. To. Read. Dummie.

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 2:39 am

          Oh wait the nasty troll “Byzantium1683” called me this:

          “You can’t keep your story straight you sack of shit.”

          See, instead of sticking to the facts of what I actually wrote, he not only accused me of lying by claiming I can’t keep my “story straight”, but he calls me a “sack of shit” …and I do hope that this monster has a mirror because this would a good time for its relevant use.

          Clearly “Byzantium1683” can’t keep the stories straight, so what does that make him? You get one guess …

        • Anne Smith says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 5:41 am

          I hope these men are charged with assault and deported.

        • c matt says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 10:00 am

          Several words you can use in a situation like that:

          “Glock, Sig Sauer, Bersa, Smith & Wesson, H&K, Ruger . . . “

        • LaLa says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 10:33 am

          First of all they tried to remedy the situation by ignoring the muslim aggressors, this did not work, the muslim aggressors then made a lunge toward the man’s wife so he moved toward the muslim aggressors at which time the muslim aggressors swung at the man and missed. The man then in self defense swung at the muslim aggressors. Fortunately for the man he did not miss. The Man had every right to defend himself, Let us be clear on that fact alone. I praise him for defending not only himself but his wife and child.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 11:38 am

          To LaLa. I think we can all agree on that. I simply disagree that Mortimer disagreed with it. He (tyrell) is a hero, and while a gun was not necessary (and they WOULD have tried him if he killed them) when you are outnumbered 8 to 1 a gun is more than reasonable to use.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 11:52 am

          I guess I asked for it, but champ calls me a sexual deviant, even when I openly anticipated her trying to project my statement back to me. Big deal then ehh?

          Champ continues to lie. she now says, that my first (clean) comment was not directed to her, but just as the time-stamps tell the truth, you can see the very 2 comments above mine are hers!

          Also, “you guys”, is a plural statement dumbass. I was referring to you and undaunted, as you were tag-teaming Mortimer at the time.

          If there is two people, and someone says “you guys” or another plural then later one of them says “wahhhh, it wasnt directed to me” Then who the fuck is it directed to?

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 11:57 am

          You continue to lie and twist. You said I did another lie. Lets examine it.

          “Good Lord. He gives himself undue credit. And I am all for giving credit, where credit is due, but this is beyond absurd–he doesn’t deserve any credit. In fact, patting himself on the back, as he did, is an insult to the readers intelligence.”

          No more than yours. How is my level of arrogance and ability relevant as to whether I lied? Totally random shit coming from your brain.

          No, since he lies repeatedly about things that are obvious, and recorded by the computer gods, It is Champ who insults the readers ability. Which is ironic, as he can’t read. Not well anyway.

          BTW, now you fall back on Seniority. It doesn’t matter how long they have known you, you were wrong on the topic that started all this. You after all, I assume are human. I hope they recognize you as a piece of shit, but whatever.

        • Achmed says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 2:16 pm

          So, the vilest of all creatures strikes a man’s wife … He is attacked by (eight was it) .. Oh, yes .. he should have handled the physical attack .. One took a swing at him, that he ducked, which was the commencement of the physical melee.

          Oh, he should have let himself be struck by the mohammedan, turned the other cheek, and watched (patiently) while the mohammedans beat and raped his wife and daughter.

          Oh yes, terrible .. those “defensive” martial arts.

          Good grief … Jihad Watch has turned into a bastion of SJW snowflakes .. cowardly ones at that.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 2:29 pm

          Who do you refer to Achmed? Mortimer, me, or both?

          For I certainly never said anything against Tyrells actions. Look at my very first post on this article, 5 hours before my Arguments here.

          “Just as they actually share no values with the progressives (the good ones anyway) Its interesting that they don’t share respect for the environment either lol.

          Good for him. I’d like to have seen that. 8 on one and he still won.”

          I hate SJWs, and I assume that is a joke about only this article, since the website Jihadwatch is one of the least SJW like websites around, though its not a racist or sexist website. Is that what you want?

          Yes, Tyrell did the right thing, and was lucky and skilled enough to survive doing it.

          I still say mortimer was talking about our next plans should be, not what Tyrell should have done. pretty obvious in the first post. This one? He says what we should do, then what Tyrell did. perhaps that is mocking sarcasm, or maybe Mortimer does not know how to speak perfect english. That, or he is smarter than us.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 6, 2017 at 11:44 pm

          byzantium1683, Champ is correct–she has been here at least two years longer than I have–since almost the beginning of Jihad Watch. We respect each other, and have never felt the need to copy each other’s style.

          You wrote:

          Graven-image has a standard method when she criticizes posters here, and I believe there were similarities with your approach in your own critique of me.
          …………………..

          I’m not sure what you mean by this, unless you mean the use of the third person.

          But I have *never* used the third person when disagreeing with ordinary posters here, including Mortimer. I am not using the third person addressing yourself, either.

          I *only* use the third person when dealing with someone–typically a vicious Muslim troll–who has made it quite clear that they are not acting in good faith, and can in no manner be considered someone who opposes Jihad.

          In which case, I use the third person because I am no longer addressing them directly, but rather dissecting their posts for the benefit of others reading here. I do this fairly rarely. The only posters I have used the third person with over the past year are ibrahim itace muhammed, Mubarak, and shabeer hasan–all ugly Muslim supremacists.

          Otherwise, no matter how sharply I may disagree with someone, I address them directly as a show of respect.

          But no–I did not invent referring to the subject of criticism in the third person. This is, in fact, quite common with critics–even, at times, when they are praising rather than criticizing their subject.

          More:

          You really badly want to be an establishment muslim, don’t you champ? Just call others clown all day.
          …………………..

          Now, I’m afraid this is just ridiculous. You may disagree with Champ here, but she has proven her bona fides countless times here as an Anti-Jihadist. Calling her a an “establishment muslim” and “a troll” and that she “subconsciously Admire Muslims” just makes you look silly.

      • honkingoose says

        Jan 5, 2017 at 12:51 am

        They (a good lot of them) don’t seem to respect our manmade laws, except when it suits them, and cite ulla as the only lawmaker they abide. We’ve imported a nasty dangerous religion and I can’t see any way back to sanity and safety. Idiot left wing politicians have written our destiny for us: one of shame at being the superior culture and absurd mental gymnastics as we pretzel bend to fit the “cultural relativity” of “Aussies” having multiple underage wives, genital mutilation, cruel and unusual methods of animal slaughter and soon, like everywhere else the religion of peace metastasizes – no go zones and trucks of islamic tolerance mowing down our children.

        • marie says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 5:37 am

          Honkingoose I agree…our politicians have brought these parasites
          into our country to feed off our ‘Social Welfare’ only a hand full will ever work. We the hard working citizens are having our money ‘Redistributed’ to this 3rd world cult. This is an act of ‘Treason’ by our government to weaken Australia’s wealth and to plunge our citizens into their 7th century religious terror attacks. We are funding these barbaric people to sit around all day and plot their jihard. Read today that the Federal Gov. has funded their schools 71million in 3 years! That money belongs to the Australian tax payer!
          We have homeless and many elderly are living below the poverty line!
          Time to change this leftist government and look after our own people
          first!

      • Muhammad's Ghost says

        Jan 5, 2017 at 3:12 am

        Byzantium : “You know what happened 200 years ago? Westerners like America fought Muslim pirates, then TALKED. And it worked too, until leftists forgot what we fought for and gave them power again.”

        At the risk of jumping in the middle of the insult parade, one could argue that it didn’t necessarily “work” 200 hundred years ago, rather it just gave them 200 years to regroup and fortify their positions to resume the Jihad…

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 11:33 am

          Thats fine, at least you didnt jump in to support the insult circus.

          You have a point, however from my understanding it did work. We kept them down, even without further fighting. And their lack of progress made them fall behind, not fortify.

          The reason they resumed the jihad, was we did not remain vigilant and leftists, so quickly went from a reasonable stand against Bigotry, to exaggerating the situation. They decided that Muslims are usually brown, so they are the good guys. THATS why we failed.

          For gods sake, we sell first-rate military equipment to Saudi Arabs now. Though one might argue thats a capitalist thing that has nothing to do with leftism.

          I saw a quote from Winston Churchill at a university the other day. Sad, these days they would linch him for his comments on Islam.

    • john spielman says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 2:24 pm

      DEPORT the muslims who started this and keep doing it until there is NO MORE muslim supremicism

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 5, 2017 at 7:21 pm

        Deportation and containment is insufficient.

        Just look at N Korea, the most ostracized, isolated country on Earth. N Koreans need no deportation from anywhere because they don’t exist anywhere outside their shithole country.

        Last year, they tested their first Hydrogen-Bomb, 1000 times more lethal than A-Bombs. Intel estimates they have at least 10 Hydrogen Thermonuclear warheads. They also now have the proven capacity to launch 2500 mile range missiles from submerged submarines.

        So, containment doesn’t work. You can ask the Iranians too. It matters not if we keep the bad guys “over there.” How does containment protect us from ICBMs, nuke on a container ship, or nuke in a U-Haul driven into Times Square? It doesn’t.

        The only long term solution is Worldwide criminalization of Islam, making its “practice or promotion” a capital offense everywhere on the globe.

        How? I’m glad you asked:

        “Total War: Extinguishing Islam from Earth” @dantriplett

        https://medium.com/@dantriplett/islamic-jihad-is-total-war-for-all-marbles-6c858098b76e

        I broadcast this often on Twitter with a poll test. Hundreds vote and 75 – 85% of all voters vote “Yes” to the question, “Do you agree with my strategy?”

        I’m a 21 year USAF Officer, and 6 year war vet. 15 years since 9/11, $6.5 Trillion US, 6500 US KIA, and what have we accomplished fighting just 2 of the 57 Islamic countries? NOTHING!!!

        In fact, the situation is far worse now than before we spilled all of our blood, borrowing the $Trillions we don’t have.

        This is a nuclear war now. Let’s face it and quit fucking around, pretending there’s a conventional solution for this. There’s not, and never has been. Believe me, as one who spent six years in the fight, watching thousands of our finest, bravest Americans die…for nothing.

        We don’t need to kill ’em all. Just enough to scare the shit out of them, breaking their will to fight. They don’t fear and respect us. The nukes will earn that for us, and quickly sow doubts in their demonic minds about their loyalties to this whole Allah thing.

        Screw the whole “boots on the ground” strategy. Dar al-Islam’s territory and 1.6 Billion Ummah is WAY too big for a conventional solution now. We don’t have the money, military, time, or the WILL to invade and indefinitely occupy 57 Muslim countries. Let’s get real. If we can’t be honest with ourselves, then we’re in deep shit, and we’ve already lost the war.

        Please take 10 minutes to read my essay above. This will all make sense to you, and I’mconfident you’ll agree with me. We have no time to waste. Iran can taste victory, and they’re not about to give up their nukes in the 11th hour of a 1400 year war.

        • Byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 7:58 pm

          You say bordering them off wont work, then you complain about boots on the ground. However, you do make sense. Nuclear war will kill many, many civilians…but its technically not genocide and may be required.

          However, Iran Does not have nukes right now, and are only getting them because of Leftist PC politics. And didnt North korea get them from china or something? In fact, every failure is due to idiots in charge, not because its impossible to make it work.

          HOWEVER, I already expressed on this article section, doubt at containment, since Nukes make these countries very dangerous. So you still raise a valid point, even though Im not sure its quite as bad.

          Nuclear war with Iran will have to wait until they can fire back lol….no, of course you mean preemptive.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 6, 2017 at 4:54 am

          @Byzantium1683

          If you took the time to read my essay, assuming you did, thanks.

          My point about no boots on the ground is that we should recall all Allied personnel back to their home countries. Remove all friendlies from Dar al-Islam so none of them get hurt.

          We don’t have enough “boots,” military, money, or time to possibly accomplish the objectives required to win this war. More importantly, Americans are war fatigued from just 2 long wars in the last 15 years. The limit of Americans’ patience for war, by the way, is just 4 1/2 years. Beyond that, they’ve had enough and start hollering to get out. Plenty of examples of this. The Revolution, The Civil War, and WWII were all won in under 4 1/2 years. How many have we won that took longer?

          Point being, if America goes to war, we better fight brutally, and we better win quickly.

          But back to my previous point: We simply don’t have enough military, troops, money, time, or the WILL to invade and indefinitely occupy 57 Muslim countries. That’s never going to happen, which leaves just one option.

          What would our grandfathers do? We think we’re so much smarter and morally superior to them, but we’re not. Not by a long shot. WE are the arrogant fools.

          Think of it this way: Trinity the first atomic weapon test, was on 16JUL1945. The Hiroshima strike was less than 3 weeks later on 6 August. If our grandfathers had atomic weapons on 7DEC1941, would they have sacrificed 407,300 of our finest, bravest Americans, and waited 3 1/2 years before using them? Of course not. They weren’t stupid. They, like we, must use the most efficient weapons we have to get the whole mess over with as early as possible. War isn’t pretty. It’s a fight to the death for all the marbles.

          WWIII can and should be fought from a cubicle dug into the bottom of a Wyoming mountain, while sipping lattes. There’s no reason for us to lose one Allied serviceman’s life.

          Nuclear weapons don’t scare anyone unless we show we have the will to use them once in a while. Furthermore, watching ammo dumps and munitions factories get bombed scares no one. Watching your cities get glassed and worrying about the safety of your own family does.

          Perhaps you didn’t read the essay (I suggest you do). I included in it some philosophical war strategy quotes from both Gen Curtis LeMay, America’s longest serving 4-Star in history, father of Strategic Area Bombing, and longtime Commander of USAF Strategic Air Command. I also included an important quote from his British counterpart, Sir Arthur Harris, Commander of RAF Bomber Command during WWII.

          Both men saw the strategic value not in avoiding collateral damage and civilian casualties, but intentionally TARGETING civilians and population centers. Read their quotes to understand why.

          By the way, I’m not pulling these strategies out of my ass. These strategies are still taught to every American Major and above. This is how wars are won, contrary to what Caliph Ohammad wants Americans to believe. It’s been done this way for centuries. The only thing that’s changed is the efficiency of weapons we have available. We even did it to our own people. Remember General Sherman’s scorched Earth March to the Sea?

          Here’s the deal: The US Military has one purpose only, and it’s not nation building or winning hearts and minds. The purpose of our military is to blow shit up and kill assloads of people in short order until we “break the enemy’s Will to Fight” and force their unconditional surrender to our terms. That’s exactly how we in the military think and speak with each other about our purpose. We just use euphemistic expressions when speaking with the public.

          War is a Battle of Wills. Whichever side loses the Will to Fight first loses the war. And by that measure, we’re losing this war badly. The Ummah has been patiently fighting this war for 1400 years. They’ll never give up unless we unleash Hell on them. People willing to murder their own children to please a fictional deity, or honor kill their daughters are deadly serious about their cause. Meanwhile, most Americans want to end all wars, cue the John Lennon music, and eat ice cream.

          And yes, as you, I neither speak of genocide. Our objective ought not be to exterminate Muslims, but rather to exterminate their Islamic ideology. In much the same way the World could live in peace with the Germans and Japanese once we extinguished Nazism and Shintoism. We must force all Muslim sovereignties to make the “practice or promotion of Islam” a capital offense Worldwide. Within Dar al-Harb, we must legislate the same, minus the nuke strikes of course.

          But as General LeMay said, “There are no innocent civilians. It’s their government, and we’re fighting a people. We’re not fighting an armed force anymore.” Lots of Muslims will die before this war is over. But we didn’t start this war, for starters. Secondly, we aim only to kill enough of them to force their surrender of Islam, without killing one more Muslim than necessary to win that objective. Meanwhile, the Ummah wants to destroy every one of us, in as horrific fashion as they can imagine. See the difference, because that’s a big one? That’s what separates the good from the evil in this World.

          As much as I love and support President Trump, as far as “extreme vetting” goes, that’s just a fantasy that will never happen. The Ummah are trained liars from birth. They’re authorized by Islamic law to wear crosses, attend Catholic Mass, partake in Christian rituals, and accept the Holy Eucharist! How could we possibly vet people willing to do that?

          Moreover, 1 out of every 7 US KIAs in Afghanistan are “Green-on-Blue:” US trained Afghan troops turning their guns on us. These are people we befriend, exchange jokes, show pictures of our children, and trust with our lives. And they repay us with sudden death.

          So this whole vetting business is never going to work. We can’t possibly sort out the “good” Muslims from the bad. And are there any good Muslims anyway? Anyone buying into the evil contained in the Quran and Sunnah has a heart and soul manipulated by demons.

          Neither did our grandfathers have the time, money, nor method to sort out the good Germans and Japanese from the bad (just 7% of Germans were Nazi). So we bombed every German and Japanese man, woman, and child in sight until they surrendered unconditionally. We wouldn’t have won the war if we didn’t. Just take a look at post-attack Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) photos of Dresden, Cologne, Hamburg, Tokyo, Osaka, Hiroshima, etc. if you don’t believe me. We razed every major German and Japanese city to the ground. How many women and children do you suppose died in those strikes? Were our grandfathers evil? Of course not. They were righteous men who knew how to destroy evil and win wars.

          Finally, although none of us really knows for certain, I’ve read some compelling Intel analysis suggesting Iran already has at least one nuke warhead. They’re just waiting to amass dozens of them and perfect their ICBM technology before launching Armageddon. At every N Korean nuke test, there’s a whole squad of Iranian nuke scientists on site to take notes and learn. So, obviously they’re working together. Iran knows more about missile technology, but N Korea knows how to make H-Bombs. Perhaps they’re trading secrets. Who knows?

          And no, I don’t believe the Chinese have given that crazy N Korean fat fuck punk any nuclear weapon secrets. In truth, they neither like nor trust him anymore than we do. They just don’t like the idea of having US Military bases right on their border. They want the buffer. I believe Kim Jong Un has spent every N Korean dime the country has on a futile arms race with us, while his people starve eating bark dust and grass. Imagine the pressure his nuke scientists feel: “Produce me a viable nuke weapon and ICBM, or I’ll feed you AND your family to a pack of starving dogs.” And he means it, and does that on a regular basis.

          Preemptive strikes? You bet!!!

          If people are pointing loaded guns at us, we’re not required to wait for them to pull the trigger before killing them first.

    • Rob says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 12:27 am

      Why are the German men – and the EU men in general – not taking this stance?
      Must it boil over into civil war before these barbarians are put in their place?

    • Carole Kotkiewicz says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 12:55 am

      It looks like women need to start getting trained in martial arts!

    • fudge says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 2:45 am

      They are always drunk and full of drugs

    • Lasse says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 10:08 am

      I was in a fight with 6 iraq c##ts they hit me with a botlle and brick then one of them got a base ball bat from the car and try to hit me in the head but i block it with my arm arm broke but still thef#cks ran away

  2. Shmooviyet says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 12:23 pm

    Bravo, heroic husband!
    Then attacked on FB by the “all cultures are equal you xenophobic warmongering beast” puffballs.

  3. Robert Crawford says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 12:26 pm

    This is why we have a 2nd Amendment in the US, as well as large-capacity magazines.

    • Savvy Kafir says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 9:27 pm

      Jihadi attacks and Muslim mob violence are definitely reasons to be thankful for the Second Amendment. Too bad places like Australia, Canada, and Europe have such draconian gun and weapons bans.

  4. Uriah Sheep says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 12:29 pm

    Blimey!! In Britain (and maybe the rest of EU), the Veteran would have been locked up for assault and Islamophobia!!
    Well done State of Victoria authorities for not punishing the indigenous victim for defending himself.
    Great Britain Law and Order representatives take note!

    • Pong says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 4:03 pm

      Authorities in Victoria are the most leftist, pro-islamic bunch of losers in Australia. As a result, most moslems, who are invading Australia, end up in Victoria. Police commissioner (a woman) and judiciary are very pro-moslem, like most of the lefties.
      Unfortunately, in the last election, a moslem woman was elected to parliament. Interesting enough, another moslem, from across the world invited her to the wh. His name is Barack Hussain Obama.

      • Anne Smith says

        Jan 5, 2017 at 5:43 am

        Invited her to the White Mosque, you mean.

  5. theendofthedemonrat says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 12:39 pm

    For me the point is that this Aussie family should have never have been put through this and that the fault lies directly with the elitist pigs who allowed these vermin into their beautiful country and this must stop. We must all put a stop to importing a people that in no way love their host countries or people!

  6. Northern Virginiastan says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 1:00 pm

    Glad to see that there are still manly men in this world, despite leftist efforts to emasculate men.

  7. Angemon says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    Mr Tyrrell claimed that Liana was punched in the face at the Cosy Corner beach, in Torquay, after one of the men put a crab pot in the water and she told him the area was a marine sanctuary and fishing was banned.

    Ah, I was puzzled by their description as “fishermen” – as if they worked for a living. “Poachers” would be a much more accurate word for them. Muslims breaking the law? Imagine my surprise…

    In the fight that took place on Sunday, January 24, 2016, Mr Tyrrell suffered minor injuries, while at least one of the fishermen was taken to hospital. No charges were laid.

    😀 😀 😀 Great outcome!

    • Donovan Nuera says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 3:12 pm

      Are crabs considered haram….or just shellfish?

      • Guest says

        Jan 5, 2017 at 9:28 pm

        No marine sanctuaries in the koran, so open slather, it seems!

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 7:06 pm

      Yes–poachers sums them up, Angemon.

  8. Undaunted says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 1:09 pm

    Fucking. A.

    This is what it is going to take, all the time and every time. Fight back, fuck ’em up. Be prepared every moment.

    And no apologies.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 1:22 pm

      NO MORE CONCESSIONS. Western people have given Islam the benefit of a doubt since 9/11. There can be no more doubting that Islam is a MISOGYNISTIC Death Cult.

      Let’s shut down Islam. Let’s deprogram Muslims right out of Islam.

      • ECAW says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 1:36 pm

        Yeah, let’s.

        How?

        • t. says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 3:15 pm

          By giving no place for Islam in the west. Those who want to continue to be called Muslims can go back to their Muslim countries

          There, in their Islamic paradises, whether in Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Pakistan, Syria or Iraq they can continue their evil cult and kill each other. When there, the pain becomes so great for them, through the spectacles of severed heads, amputated hands, stoned to death or thrown from high rise buildings and then skulls are crushed if still alive, all of that and even more while pleasures become more and more so scarce- TV ha-ram, soccer ha-ram, amusement parks ha-ram, music ha-ram, chess ha-ram, female voice singing ha-ram, female beauty to be seen by others ha-ram, dogs ha-ram, cats ha-ram, ..etc., gradually they would be deprogrammed after Islam causes their numbers to dwindle just to the edge of extinction!

          What is taking place in the west these days regarding Islam is a very sad joke! Western countries, mostly unconsciously, make it very easy, comfortable and even enticing to be a practicing Muslim or to convert to Islam! Look at how many western governments are becoming tacitly accommodating of Sharia, how many Muslims with several wives living on welfare in countries such as, Norway, England and Sweden.and how many well known Muslim terrorists are being cared for and their holy rights sanctioned, on western soil, while many of their victims or potential victims are fighting everyday, tooth and nail, just to have their basic of basic human rights met!

          What happens to converts from Islam to Christianity or atheism? They are punished indirectly by being ignored and not supported while their lives become endangered by leaving Islam and that ‘s to say the least of their plight.

          Unless the west knows how to use the principal of pain and pleasure, the most powerful motivator and catalyst for change ever known to human beings, in the game it’s playing with Islam, it is going to lose because its adversary has a solid record and experience of using it, for over 1400 years now.

      • Peggy says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 3:08 pm

        mortimer says

        January 4, 2017 at 2:13 pm

        We should do it with words. He did with defensive martial arts.
        —————————————–
        His wife tried it with words and that obviously doesn’t work.
        The only thing Muslims understand and respect is violence so let’s give them plenty.
        If there were only two Muslims there I would bet anything they would not even make a sound but since there were several, these “brave” maggots thought they would win.
        Cowards, all of them so what are we waiting for?

        • Donovan Nuera says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 3:13 pm

          Nothing is more fun than pulling on beards! The longer, the better!

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 3:14 pm

          Yeah, what Peggy said.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 6, 2017 at 11:53 pm

          Damn right Peggy!

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 7:10 pm

        Mortimer, you keep going on about “deprogramming” Muslims. You don’t say how this would work–it never has.

        I don’t know why you are so wedded to something that has never worked.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:23 pm

          Yeah, GI, he’s way off track. You re-program a jihadi with a Mozambique: two rounds in the chest and one in the head.

        • Byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:38 pm

          THAT, I disagree with. We have no hope of converting Muslims, they must be cordoned off in their home countries by force. I’m not willing to consider genocide, but Trumps idea, so mocked, is less than we must do lol.

          However, I am willing to ignore Mortimers naivety in this matter. Disagreement will be enough.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:42 pm

          So, you’re unwilling to kill a committed Muslim terrorist. Got it. Thanks for the clarification.

        • Byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:43 pm

          I see you continue with meaningless insults, like this is a game. Maybe it is…

          I am unwilling to kill a billion women and children just because they are sick in the head, you Dumbass.

          OF COURSE all the terrorists must die. I said “by force” They will always make more, but the borders will be set by that point. Maybe a more permanent solution can be found, but like I said, Genocide is not really desirable to me.

          Israel and other border nations could be missile attacked, but Im sure their generals will figure something out. Besides, like Graven kinda said, Hit them hard enough and they will stop fighting.

        • t. says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 1:13 pm

          gravenimage, look at my above comment for how to deprogram Muslims. Byzantium1683 has also, a similar idea to mine. Look at his above comments.

          This should be the task of all non Muslim countries, not just the west. First the rest of the world should realize the urgency to work on and contain Islam’s threat to humanity. All countries which don’t have immediate issues with Islam should also get involved because it’s a matter of time before they start to have them.

          In the jungle, predators like lions and hyenas work in groups to isolate a potential prey and steer it away from the rest of the group. Once that happens, it’s a matter of time before the group of predators finish it off. Islam works in the same way.

          Islam’s preys in succession were- Arab peninsula, El Sham (modern day Syria, Iraq and Jordan), northern and eastern Africa, Persia, India and the eastern half of the Roman empire (modern day Turkey and parts of southern Europe). Its current potential prey, on which it’s working to finish off, is the west.

          Islam’s ability to succeed, survive, and disseminate its venomous ideas is greatly helped and enhanced by the fragmentation of the world as it stands today. For example, countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and all Latin American countries, in general, see Islam’s problem as is only with the west, they are unaware that after Islam finishes with the west by totally conquering and subduing it, their turn is next!

          The solution is to have all countries of the non Muslim world- all of the west, eastern European block, Russia, China, India, and Latin America put on the back burner certain things like their differences, economies egoistic ambitions and give pushing back against Islam its due place on their list of priorities.

          A virus of the human mind, killer virus like Ebola or a virus software for a computer is given no place by a sane person, body, society or a computer hardware,whatsoever. All efforts are made to warn about. contain and ultimately finish it.

          A good example of this is what happened during the recent outburst of the Ebola epidemic in western Africa. Large areas, where many cases of the infection were discovered, in Sierra leone, Ivory coast and Guinea, were quarantined. People could live their normal daily lives in those huge towns, cities or states but safety measure were taken for those going in or coming out from those areas.

          There should be no place for Islam in any psychologically and mentally sane place on this planet. Those who want to continue to believe in and live by Islam’s teachings and belief system, can do so by going back to their Islamic paradises and forced to stay there. Wonderful exciting places such as- Saudi Arabia, ISIS, Somalia, Pakistan, Afghanistan and the rest of the list!

        • Peggy says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 8:10 pm

          If only we could slip contraception in their water somehow. Problem is other people will drink that water too.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 21, 2017 at 6:37 pm

          t., I very much agree with the idea of isolating Islam–something I have advocated many times. It kept the West largely safe for over two hundred years.

          But I urge this as a protection for Infidels–not, with all respect, because I think it is apt to cause Muslims to leave Islam.

          After all, many Muslims live in parts of Dar-al-Islam that have been Shari’ah sh*tholes for centuries, and few of them are poised to become apostates.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 7, 2017 at 5:16 pm

        Mortimer, you always push “deprogramming”, yet have never once said how it would work. The fact it that deprogramming Muslims has *never* worked.

    • rubiconcrest says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 6:45 pm

      Without a doubt people must stand up to the violence this family experienced but it is sadly not the answer. The Muslim men are not going to change what they believe so, after they serve time in jail, they must be deported. No civil society can be expect to suffer this kind of abuse from immigrants.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 7:13 pm

        I agree that it is not the entire answer, rubiconcrest–but if Muslims knew they were going to get smacked down every time they tried to pull some thuggery, it would go a long way to solving the problem.

        • dumbledoresarmy says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 5:46 pm

          Yep.

          Longterm solution is to a/ stop bringing them in and b/ remove those already present, but, in the *meantime*, if both ordinary citizens *and* law enforcement refused to put up with any nonsense, the mohammedthugs would back down.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 5:27 pm

          Very true, DDA.

  9. mortimer says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 1:18 pm

    Eight to one? Hmm. Lt Col Tyrrell sure is real man!

    • Undaunted says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 3:16 pm

      You’ve shown clearly through this thread that you just want to chat it up with these motherfuckers; so if Tyrrell took on 8 alone and that makes him a real man but you’re not willing to take on even one, what does that make you, Morty?

    • Champ says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 6:06 pm

      mort wrote:

      “Lt Col Tyrrell sure is real man!”

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      You’re mocking him for being a “real man”? …why yes he is actually!

      His response is the right response, whereas you know nothing about being a “real man” yourself. And the only one who deserves to be mocked is YOU for demonstrating what a coward you are. Jeez.

      Only like-minded wimps would agree with you.

      • Byzantium1683 says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 6:59 pm

        He may be a whimp, but you are an Idiot.

        Reread his statement up there. He said we should emulate Tyrell in talking, not that we should talk only. Clearly he referred to the solution to Islam, not the solution to 8 punks on the street.

        As for this message, while I can understand confusion, if you try to decipher his broken English. There is no reason to assume sarcasm, rather it looks like the same awe any reasonable man would have.

        Is mortimer not a long-time contributor here? If he is, I would say the world needs Mortimers almost as much as it needs tryells, though obviously that Australian takes the cake.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:10 pm

          “Is mortimer not a long-time contributor here?”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Oh please, you used that same rationale in your comment above to defend mortimer. And according to you, then you should treat me with respect since I’m a “long-time contributor”, too. I guess calling me an “idiot” exposes your flagrant double-standard.

          BTW, you’re the idiot because mortimer is clearly mocking Lt Col Tyrrell, so I suggest you reread his comment.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:13 pm

          “Byzantium1683” has his priorities completely screwed up …

          What matters is what mortimer wrote, today, and he deserves the feedback that he’s getting.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:28 pm

          Fuck you Byz. The line of “thinking” Mortimer has put down in this thread clearly depicts his error. Morty is obviously mocking Tyrrell. And, again, what the fuck difference does it make how long anyone has been commenting here? If that’s the thing that makes any comment posted here right or wrong, then I may be the rightest one on the block because I’ve been here since the very beginning of Robert’s blog.

          Yeah… fuck you, Byz.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:34 pm

          Byzantium1683, your perspective would make sense if mortimer hadn’t made other comments on this thread suggesting a defense tactic of “words” rather than force.

          Again, it is YOU who’s the “idiot” since you aren’t taking his other remarks, on this *same* thread, into account. Clearly mortimer is mocking Lt Col Tyrrell.

          Sorry, but the truth is that YOU’RE the profound “idiot” …and it’s rather funny that you think that I’ve read his remark wrong, when you did. Context is key here.

        • Byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:19 pm

          Champ, I called you an Idiot because you were acting like one. I want to respect you for your seniority, but it’s kinda hard you know?

          Context? Hahaha, just like leftists with the Quran. Of course I know the context. With the first post. I admit this particular post of his might have been mocking tyrell, but “contextually” his broken English makes it possible he simply agrees that tyrell was impressive.

          Both of you misunderstood his first post for sure. I wrote a good refutation up there, but if you are lazy I will just say you are speaking to the choir-no matter what Mortimer meant, I understand those little shits need to be beaten up. But Talking will be essiential for the final victory, which I think was Mortimers point.

          So, since you deserve it, I will finish off with….fuck you too, regardless of seniority.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:38 pm

          Byzantium1683 wrote:

          “So, since you deserve it, I will finish off with….fuck you too, regardless of seniority.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          I never asked for–nor do I require–that you treat me with respect due to my “seniority.” Remember, this is YOUR requirement, not mine. It’s clear that you don’t even take yourself seriously …

          BTW, I never wrote “fuck you” to you, so I’m not sure why you’re stating this to me in response–perhaps you’re confusing me with someone else.Yeah overall you appear to be a very confused person.

      • Champ says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 7:50 pm

        I wrote:

        “Only like-minded wimps would agree with you.”

        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

        I see that a like-minded wimp does agree with mortimer …”Byzantium1683″!

        Congratulations to both of these fools …they make things so much safer for all of us / sarc!!

        • Byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:33 pm

          I see that you posted this before my reply.

          I DO NOT AGREE WITH WHAT YOU THINK.

          I simply disagree that Mortimer meant that specific situation. If he actually meant don’t fight back, I would not have defended him, seniority or not.

          Do you know what my username means? Two battles against Muslims, involving men more brave then you will ever be. Does that sound like pacifism to you?

          If you two Knuckleheads would just stop sweet-talking each other and read correctly….

          Also, I damn well do make it safer. You go around targeting Muslim civilians, you make it harder to convince your countries we are not a bunch of racists.

          Of course, self-defense is an exeption, and I personally find it unlikely we can convince people, but you ain’t helpin.

        • Carolyne says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 10:13 am

          I know of no war which, when being attacked, has been won with words.

          Thank you Mr. Blackthorne, for telling us what we “Should do.” Unsolicited advice is almost never welcome, nor is yours.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:07 pm

          Yes, and it is Blackthornes right to speak that supposed “unsolicited advice” though I can understand your annoyance.

          Then you are wrong, as many wars have been won with words Carolyne. Many. Though like you said, they almost always require people to die first.

          However, the event in the article was not a war, but a street fight. Tyrell had to beat those little shits, and is lucky he succeeded. (though of course it was probably skill that did it)

  10. billybob says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 1:21 pm

    Who appointed this woman as a conservation officer?

    That was her big mistake. She should have kept her mouth shut and quietly called police.

    That said, that doesn’t give the Muslim brutes licence to attack her.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 1:26 pm

      Disagree. We are all responsible for preserving our precious wildlife. She TOOK RESPONSIBILTY for her society. Good for Mrs. Tyrrell. We need more people who will NOT BACK DOWN.

      Tell them off, then call the cops. Eventually, Muslims will realize we will not tolerate their supremacism, thuggishness, misogyny and conquest.

      • Undaunted says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 1:29 pm

        Yeah, what you said.

        • Donovan Nuera says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 3:15 pm

          That is why we can conduct “citizens’ arrest”; we are free to call out criminals and wrongdoers in public; it is expected!

      • Undaunted says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 3:20 pm

        My “… what you said” was for the part about not backing down. But just telling them off won’t work, nor will calling the police.

        Sooner or later you’re going to have to take ’em to the dirt and fuck ’em up before they do it to you. I’ve dealt with these kind of people all my life. I know what I’m talkin’ about.

        You need to man the fuck up, Morty.

        • Byzantium1683 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:05 pm

          Kinda true undaunted, but the world needs Mortimers too.

          Do you seriously think a bunch of hooligans and beatings will stop Islamification of the west?

          We DO need to talk. Robert Spencer has devoted his life to talking, because he knows victory will only come through warnings and speech, not fists.

          Of course, fists and guns would work. But that’s what’s talking is for. To convinces many more fists to join the fight.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:44 pm

          Byzantium1683 wrote:

          “Kinda true undaunted, but the world needs Mortimers too.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          NOT when you’re being punched in the face!

          I would want my husband to be more like UNDAUNTED in that situation—not a wimp like mortimer. C’mon you two need to grow a pair. You make me sick.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 5:39 pm

          Byzantium1683 wrote:

          We DO need to talk. Robert Spencer has devoted his life to talking, because he knows victory will only come through warnings and speech, not fists.
          ………………………..

          Byzantium1683, Robert Spencer is talking to *wake up Infidels* to the Jihad threat.

          He is *not* talking to Jihadists, trying to convince them that waging violent Jihad is not playing nice.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 8, 2017 at 4:16 am

          @gravenimage

          “Robert Spencer is talking to *wake up Infidels* to the Jihad threat.

          He is *not* talking to Jihadists, trying to convince them that waging violent Jihad is not playing nice.”

          So true.

          Robert is a 4-Star General in the Counter-jihad. But the Ummah won’t listen to him or any other Kaffir until we have our boot on their throats.

          Three or four nuke strikes, broadcast across all social media will begin opening their ears.

          Like you said, Robert’s main objective now, IMHO, is to wake up the sleepers, and try pulling the useful idiots’ heads from their rectums.

          But later on, before the major combat ops have even concluded, and after, Robert’s expertise will be invaluable to President Trump & Co regarding how the post-Islamic Apostate World ought to look, the history of the Apostates, and who and why specific Apostate groupings would or would not work together. No one knows more about the Ummah than Robert.

          Without Islam in their lives, the Ummah’s emotional energy will have a gigantic gaping hole, or vacuum. Robert will have some great advice for our leaders on how best to fill that vacuum in their souls, and what we ought be encouraging. In much the same way MacArthur recognized the need to replace Shintoism with Christianity, so he imported 5000 Christian missionaries for the job.

          If we forbid a people’s religion, post-war, we must steer them toward a replacement. Not with guns, but with logic (I’m speaking post-war of course). Atheism isn’t the answer.

        • Rob says

          Jan 8, 2017 at 9:17 am

          “…Sooner or later you’re going to have to take ’em to the dirt and fuck ’em up before they do it to you….”

          I’s like JR Ewing’s “Christian Approach”:

          “Do unto others, before they do it to you…”

      • More Ham Ed says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 6:59 pm

        “call the cops” – and wait 19+ minutes while you’re getting shot at, beat, hit, etc. greeeeeat ‘plan’.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:14 pm

          If they show up at all. Thanks, MHE.

          I’ve said it dozens of times both here and at my blog: US cops are nnnnot sworn to protect YOU. They are sworn to protect society in general. So, if they don’t show up to save your dumb, unprepared ass, it’s your fault if you get fucked up.

          Got that, billybob, morty, and byz?… you fucking losers.

        • Bill says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:02 pm

          “call the cops” – and wait 19+ minutes while you’re getting shot at, beat, hit, etc. greeeeeat ‘plan’.

          19 minutes for a police response? The response time of a .357 Magnum is 1,100 feet per second.

        • LR says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:41 am

          Oh, come on…

          Can’t people disagree and have a heated debate without using insults like ‘loser’, and such things…

        • Carolyne says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 10:18 am

          Good point, Bill. Actually we are in this alone and we need not expect protection from the cops. We must rely on ourselves.

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 5, 2017 at 8:12 pm

        No one should ever trust a Muslim, especially Western women.

        Had her husband not been there, Ms. Tyrell would’ve been gang-raped. Sadly, simply telling a Muslim he’s fishing in the wrong spot is not a wise move when in isolated areas. One day, after a huge World War, this fear will no longer be necessary. But we’re not there yet, and it pays to be smart, and live to fight another day.

        Like when my ex-wife laid on the horn non-stop behind a car full of black guys, in the middle of the ‘hood, at 2 AM because they weren’t moving fast enough. I was unarmed. Were they? Who knows? There were six of them, and we were in an isolated area.

        She could be so damned stupid. But this is the same woman, with a lousy temper, who can’t drive to the store without screaming at another driver through her windshield. There’s a reason we’re no longer married.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 3:10 pm

      The law. We can all remind people that they are breaking the law.
      Anyone decent would’ve said thank you and explained that they didn’t know.

      • Damocles Junior says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 4:02 pm

        These people (Muslims) only respect Islamic law. Other ethnic minorities also ignore our fishing laws, everything from safety, bag limits, fish size and general safety.

        But I am a little bit concerned about all of this from the news reporting aspect, like I did not see any mention of this on the many news bulletins that I was forced to endure at the time. It seems it only came to light on FB and the Daily Mail which is not really an Australian paper.

        Here in Sydney at about the same time a group of Somali/Sudanese youths went on a rampage at our popular and world famous Bondi Beach. The police took swift action and arrested them all. The media blanked out all of their faces but there was no mistaking what and who they were. I understand that they all like coming over to the coast from Sydney’s western mainly Muslim suburbs just to cause trouble. Our multicultural authorities are trying, without much success to get Muslim youth involved in positive aspects of our beach culture.

        As for Mr & Mrs Tyrrell, you are both heroes in my estimation and you represent the silent majority of real Australians.

        • simpleton1 says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:28 pm

          Good on the new real media reporting that refuses to self censor, and hopefully also will not be censored or gagged by officialdom,
          They need all the support they can get, spread the word so that it will destroy the old media with its hidden agenda of white washing.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 7:23 pm

      With all respect, billybob, the idea that a woman does not have the right to make a simple statement about the law is much mistaken.

      Liana Tyrrell probably initially assumed that these were civilized people who may just have been ignorant of the law at that beach–if they had been civilized people and not Muslims, they would have thanked her for the head’s up.

      • Guest says

        Jan 6, 2017 at 8:14 pm

        Exactly. If they wanted to really fit in, they would be interested in protecting marine reserves.

  11. Byzantium1683 says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 1:37 pm

    Just as they actually share no values with the progressives (the good ones anyway) Its interesting that they don’t share respect for the environment either lol.

    Good for him. I’d like to have seen that. 8 on one and he still won.

  12. Undaunted says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 1:37 pm

    Having been the “one” in numerous one-against-several fights in my life, I wrote at my blog on how to win these encounters. One of the best articles, however, on this is linked to below. The thing is to not be afraid, do not think you cannot win.

    L’audace, l;audace, toujours l’audace…

    http://www.realfighting.com/multiple_assailants.php

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 7:28 pm

      Thanks for that link, Undaunted.

      • Undaunted says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 7:29 pm

        Good stuff, eh? You’re welcome.

    • Cecilia Ellis says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 8:58 pm

      Undaunted, thank you for your service in law enforcement and for posting the link to an absolutely excellent and accurate article!

      Hope you had a blessed Christmas season and Happy New Year.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 9:04 pm

        Second this, Cecilia.

      • Byzantium1683 says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 9:14 pm

        You are a pea-brained Idiot when it comes to normal human interaction and reading, but I must still respect your Service. I know combined the positive part means nothing, but its true.

        Just like how Vietnam soldiers must be respected, even though the war was stupid. Actually nothing like that, because I have nothing against any of them.

        • Cecilia Ellis says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:35 pm

          Byzantium, what on earth did I say to Undaunted that merited such a response from you?

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:02 pm

          Cecilia, “Byzantium” is responding to Undaunted, but instead he replied to you. Yeah he’s a cowardly person because he won’t respond directly to Undaunted, but instead goes through you, and me, too. He replied to one of my comments and stated “fuck you too”, when I never even wrote that to him. Again, he couldn’t respond directly to Undaunted, but instead he hides behind others like the wimp that he is.

        • Cecilia Ellis says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:13 pm

          Thanks, Champ. Now I understand.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 8:52 pm

          Who are you to say the Vietnam War was stupid? Hindsight is 20/20, but those were different times. There was a Worldwide clash of two civilizations, not too different than now, except that our enemy back then loved their children as much as we loved ours. Whereas our enemy now takes pride in murdering their own children to please a fictional deity. Or honor kills their daughters for the most insignificant of slights.

          I have a whole lot of friends who fought in that war, and they believed in its righteousness. The only thing stupid about it was the unwinnable ROE our Piece of Worthless Shit CINC hamstringed them with: The same asshole who said, “Those boys can’t hit an outhouse without my permission.”

          Many of us believed in that campaign, even if you didn’t. Hundreds of thousands of brave Americans made enormous sacrifices, and 58,000 of them answered their country’s call by paying with their lives. They were Americans. They died fighting for our National Mission. Have some respect.

          Again, the ROE and the CINC were the problem. A smart CINC would’ve used round-the-clock Strategic Area Bombing to bring the enemy to their knees, as in Operation Linebacker I and II, which worked. And he would’ve given every American serviceman the authority to kill any and all enemy he felt necessary without having to radio in for permission. The same suicidal rules dipshit Obama places on our troops today.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 5:54 pm

          I don’t think the Vietnam War was stupid–the only thing stupid about it was that we were not allowed to win it.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 8, 2017 at 6:36 am

          @gravenimage

          Thank you gravenimage. So refreshing to hear support from Americans for the Vietnam campaign for a change.

          Our troops aren’t brainwashed fools following orders for stupid wars, like my arrogant brother believes.

          Particularly now, when every serviceman is a volunteer and we have no conscription, our troops are patriotic Americans, and we believe in our National Missions. And not because we’re stupid brainwashed dumbshits just following orders.

          I still must have this argument with my mother three or four times every year.

          And let me tell you, the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars (particularly Iraq) weren’t popular with many Americans either. Both wars I spent six years of my life fighting and getting shot at, watching so many outstanding brave men die.

          Nothing pissed me off more than the useless platitude many would say to me, including my own brother, “Oh, I support the troops. I just think the war is stupid.”

          I was polite to people during the earlier years, but later on I just let them have it, telling them to just STFU and save it, because I had no interest in listening to them aid and abet our enemy.

          Supporting our troops is impossible without supporting their mission. DOES EVERYONE HEAR THAT!!!

          Nothing scares our enemy more than an American People 100% galvanized to win the war. Our enemies are students of history. They’re not stupid. They know they don’t have the numbers or the technology to defeat us on the battlefield. So they go after the hearts and minds of our American population, who then put pressure on our elected Representatives to cut the purse strings, making waging war impossible.

          The ones who are especially infuriating are the armchair warriors, never having worn their country’s uniform themselves, who posit: “ISIS (they never say “Islam”) may be a problem down the road, possibly requiring some Drone strikes, but I don’t believe in war, and only a maniac would ever use nukes anymore.”

          These morons just don’t get that they can’t have it both ways.

          Like my idiot brother, dancing around on the National Mall with his peacenik pals protesting the same war his own brother, and 500,000 other American brothers and sisters were fighting on the other side of the planet.

          “Bush lied, while troops die!” “This war is just to make Cheney and Halliburton rich!” “Bush and Cheney lie to us. They only want the oil!”

          Well, he finally got what he wanted. His hero Ohammad exfiltrated all US troops. How well did that turn out for us? And he wants the same thing for Afghanistan, and Gitmo of course. Idiot.

          And he looks at me like I’m Hitler when I tell him as a USAF pilot I’d take four-seconds to verify the launch code, then nuke a city without hesitation when ordered.

          He, like all libs, doesn’t understand we need to hold close Strategic territory for logistics and forward basing if we want to wage conventional wars. We needed total control of both Iraq and Afghanistan to wage and win a conventional war with Iran. (What do you mean “war with Iran,” we signed the nuclear agreement?) My God, my brother can be such a fucking fool. It’s sad. We seldom speak.

          So, without Iraq and Afghanistan, a nuclear war with Iran is the ONLY option left. Which is just fine with me.

          Of course hindsight is 20/20, but we should’ve just used a few nukes to break our enemy’s will to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan in the first place. But can you imagine the American public’s excoriation of Bush 43 if he’d gone straight to Plan B with nuke strikes, without trying a conventional campaign first? They would’ve stormed the White House with pitchforks and torches.

          But now, Americans have wised up to the true cost of conventional war, with a whole lot of heartbreaking American blood, time, and shitloads of money we don’t have. I think they’re coming around to the idea of a nuclear solution. America is ready for Plan B.

          Every time I poll test on Twitter the nuke-only strategy essay that I’ve plastered on this site dozens of times, hundreds vote, and 75 – 85% of all respondents vote “Yes,” every time.

      • byzantium1683 says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 10:38 pm

        Sorry Cecilla, I meant no insults towards you. And with all respect, you don’t understand ATM. Let me explain my side of this.

        When I clicked on you, I was agreeing with your statement about undaunted’s Police service, while also calling him an idiot because he is. I was going to say I accidentally clicked on you, but I did it intentionally.

        Again, are you stupid Champ? If I am attacking Undaunted, does it matter where I do it? He will still see. No cowardice whatsoever. The only problem with not linking directly to him is that it involves innocents, like Cecilla here.

        Also, I already apologized for saying fuck you to you. but wait, don’t say my apology sucks, I know it does. You have heaped so many insults upon me, that any insult I accidentally give to you is well deserved.

        BTW, thanks for admitting I did not target Cecilla with that post. While you twist much else, you stuck to the truth there.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:25 pm

          “Byzantium1683” wrote:

          “You have heaped so many insults upon me, that any insult I accidentally give to you is well deserved.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          More fiction from the bizarre “Byzantium1683” …

          How does someone “accidentally” give an insult? That’s a new one even from someone who’s playing the victim so well. Wow that’s quite an imaginary achievement, I must say …nevertheless it’s impossible to “accidentally” insult anyone. Sorry if that comes as a shock to your …sensibilities (cough!).

          And he wrote this gem …

          “Again, are you stupid Champ?”

          Nope. But you are. Obviously.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:04 am

          See, you clearly are stupid.

          YOU YOURSELF SAID that I said fuck you at the wrong target, namely you. If I did not intend to say something to you, think for a second. its a fucking accident! Its not rocket science.

          My god you are so fucking dumb. I’m glad you are refering to yourself and not Cecila, though you will no doubt change your story on that one too.

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:21 am

          The class clown “Byzantium1683” must be drunk …

          20 bucks that he is! Any takers? lol!

          Wow with each stroke of the keyboard “Byzantium1683” demonstrates what a drunken fool he must be. You’ve made this way too easy for me, so keep ’em coming fool …

          Although now you’re getting really boring …got any new and better material that I can work with troll?

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:24 am

          I don’t know, what have you got Troll? (already established why he is a projecting troll)

          funny, more false insults, since I claim to be completely sober. Anyone would be, reading your shit.

          I imagine however, you were born drunk. Maybe high.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:27 am

          Oh sorry, SHE. I forgot what Gender to blame for your disgusting existence..

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 3:07 am

          Brutal and Cruel “Byzantium1683” wrote:

          “Oh sorry, SHE. I forgot what Gender to blame for your disgusting existence..”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Haters like “Byzantium1683” gotta hate …

        • Champ says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 3:09 am

          “I imagine however, you were born drunk.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Oh dear he’s way too clever for me …

          *Eyes Roll*

        • Damocles Junior says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 5:05 am

          Dear Moderator, is it possible to moderate or preferably eliminate troll such as Byzantium, his debate and comments are becoming very tedious.

          DJ

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:11 pm

          Damocles, What you propose is censorship. I AM NOT A TROLL, and I believe in the mission of Jihad-watch.

          If Champ was not here, I would be adding tasteful and accepted comments, as you can see on every other article, and indeed every post I have made on this article without champ or undaunted.

          With all respect It is not your place to call for such an subjective decision. (though freedom of speech says you can try and get me banned)

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 12:13 pm

          Also I don’t mean to spam, but I meant how I am arguing with Champ. While she is more of a troll than me, I don’t mean to suggest she can’t speak either.

  13. Thomas says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 1:40 pm

    The Muslim men, at least the one who hit the lady, should be charged with assault, several men ( not really ), attack a family because this lady points out they are breaking the law, these people believe their sick laws are superior to any others and this veteran had every right to protect and defend his wife! Good man!

    • Salome says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 4:25 pm

      Exactly–‘no charges were laid’ doesn’t just refer to the Colonel (who should get a medal), but to the scum who attacked his wife. Not good enough.

  14. Bill says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 1:58 pm

    This courageous gentleman’s fight is not over. He will likely be personally sued by the malefactors with some CAIR-like outfit ginning up the lawsuit and financing it. After enough Aussie leftists whine and cry about Islamophobia, some politically motivated prosecutor will eventually take up the case against him.

    Meanwhile the cowardly eight or some other self-loathing SJW will turn him and his personal information over to ISIS and a fatwa will be issued against him.

    He will never have a moment’s piece again.

    • Undaunted says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 4:00 pm

      You’re discouraging others from standing their ground and kicking ass when it needs to be kicked. When more and more people do what Tyrrell did, and ignore your insipid prophecy, the legal system may very well begin to lean in the direction of turning a blind eye to Muslims getting their karmas leveled when they have it comin’.

      • billybob says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 5:25 pm

        Yea – let’s all take the law into our own hands and become vigilantes for the cause. Soon we will become indistinguishable from those whom we persecute.

        Do you folks hear what you are all saying? Just what did this woman accomplish with her big mouth? Almost got them both beat up. So apparently the guy got off with only light injuries. No mention if he did any damage to the others.

        Do you think he taught them a lesson? Do you think they will now hesitate a bit before violating the law? I suggest nothing was gained from the event except some people get to talk about kickin’ ass.

        We live in democratic countries, where the rule of law prevails. We don’t take the law into our own hands – even against Muslims we don’t like. If we think the law isn’t doing what it should, we work within the system to change it. If we all go rushing off like a bunch of yahoo vigilantes we soon won’t have a country governed by law. I am astonished by the comments I am reading here from all these armchair warriors.

        btw: I’m no pacifist. I think I could easily kill if that were the only way to protect a loved one from death or proportionally serious harm. I also believe that I shouldn’t go around looking for trouble, and poking my nose where it doesn’t belong. It is not for me to tell off the endless jerks of all kinds we can run across. I’m not the sheriff, not even the deputy. If I see somebody breaking the law, and I feel motivated, I will report it. That’s it. Not for me to be the cop or the judge.

        • Peggy says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 5:50 pm

          You do make some very good points.
          This man was trained and ready for trouble and handled that situation well, but perhaps if it was someone else the outcome could have been very bad.
          Still, now that they got their butts kicked they might think twice before attacking someone, even if they are in a group because they just learned that it is them who could get beaten.

          I suppose each situation has to be approached as it should be.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:52 pm

          I’ve been in hundreds of situations in my life as a cop and personal protection specialist where back-up was not there nor on the way when I was fighting for my life or that of another. In scenarios like the one Tyrrell faced, he was right to hammer those motherfuckers.

          I’ve found that most people who accuse others of being arm-chair-warriors are too bound by their own fears to follow the advice of real warriors. You expose yourself for the moral and physical coward you are with your own words: “If I see somebody breaking the law, and I feel motivated, I will report it. That’s it.” So, if you step into a store to get a lollipop to suck on and you come out of said store to find some dirt-bag about to make your wife suck his dick or he’ll kill her, you might call the cops… if you feel motivated.

          Fuck you, Byz. You’re a craven chicken-shit fool.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 7:57 pm

          Oh, you’re not Byz, you’re billybob.

          Fuck you, billybob.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:04 pm

          billybob wrote:

          Yea – let’s all take the law into our own hands and become vigilantes for the cause. Soon we will become indistinguishable from those whom we persecute.
          …………………………..

          Good God–what crap. A man protecting his wife from an attack by a Muslim mob is not a “vigilante”–everyone has, or should have, the right of self defense.

          And you really believe that preventing Muslims from beating up, raping, or murdering you wife is *persecution*? Good grief…

          More:

          Do you folks hear what you are all saying? Just what did this woman accomplish with her big mouth? Almost got them both beat up. So apparently the guy got off with only light injuries. No mention if he did any damage to the others.
          …………………………..

          Her “big mouth”? Now you believe that women should not be allowed to speak to unrelated men–in the *free West*?

          There has been a recent crackdown here in the San Francisco Bay Area on dogs being allowed off-leash in many parks and beaches–but a lot of dog walkers are unfamiliar with the changes.

          Just the other day I noticed a dog off-leash and informed the owners about the new law. I wasn’t so much using my “big mouth” to enforce the law as to have the dog walkers avoid a possible ticket.

          The dog walkers put their dog back on leash and *thanked me* for the information (though they did grumble about the stupid new law). Luckily, these were civilized Infidels, and not ravening Muslims.

          Do you believe I should have been beaten up by eight men for daring to open my “big mouth” and speak to unrelated men?

          More:

          Do you think he taught them a lesson? Do you think they will now hesitate a bit before violating the law? I suggest nothing was gained from the event except some people get to talk about kickin’ ass.
          …………………………..

          I can assure you something would have been *lost* if they had found that this husband was happy to sit back and let a Muslim mob assault, rape, or murder his wife with no resistance.

          More;

          We live in democratic countries, where the rule of law prevails.
          …………………………..

          Yes, we do. And the rule of law does not allow Muslims to beat a woman for speaking to them, nor does it prevent us from fighting back if attacked. I’m not sure why you would believe it does.

          More:

          We don’t take the law into our own hands – even against Muslims we don’t like. If we think the law isn’t doing what it should, we work within the system to change it. If we all go rushing off like a bunch of yahoo vigilantes we soon won’t have a country governed by law. I am astonished by the comments I am reading here from all these armchair warriors.
          …………………………..

          The idea that the law as it now stands allows mobs of Muslims to beat a woman in the street but prevents defending against same is utterly mistaken.

          More:

          btw: I’m no pacifist. I think I could easily kill if that were the only way to protect a loved one from death or proportionally serious harm.
          …………………………..

          Then why do you have a problem with this man protecting his wife from being beaten (or worse) by *eight Muslim men*? Surely you cannot believe that this would not result in serious harm to her?

          More:

          I also believe that I shouldn’t go around looking for trouble, and poking my nose where it doesn’t belong. It is not for me to tell off the endless jerks of all kinds we can run across. I’m not the sheriff, not even the deputy. If I see somebody breaking the law, and I feel motivated, I will report it. That’s it. Not for me to be the cop or the judge.
          …………………………..

          Her letting them know that what they were doing violated the law was *not* “looking for trouble”. In a civilized society, notifying someone that they are–perhaps unwittingly, as in the case of the dog walkers–is not illegal, nor does is constitute grounds for Muslims to assault us.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:16 pm

          Well said, GI.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:26 pm

          billybob wrote:

          “Yea – let’s all take the law into our own hands and become vigilantes for the cause.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Oh good grief. Are you suggesting that Lt Col Tyrrell was being a “vigilante”? If so, then you are sadly mistaken and you’re applying a gross misappropriation of the term to this situation. Remember, there are laws which protect self-defense, which Lt Col Tyrrell had every right to exercise in defending how own wife.

          And you made another shocking statement here;

          “Just what did this woman accomplish with her big mouth?”

          What? …”her big mouth”? Are you kidding? She was RIGHT to speak up and say what she did, and now you want to blame her for the attack because of “her big mouth”? Wow you’re ridiculous and completely wrongheaded regarding whether or not she should have said anything; and your focus is on the wrong person(s). Of course she should have, and of course Lt Col Tyrrell had every right to defend and protect his wife in the manner that he did.

          You need to seriously rethink your position–big time.

        • billybob says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:39 pm

          Fuck you guys. I lived and survived on the streets at one point in my life – in a tough neighbourhood. I don’t think any of you armchair warriors know what you are talking about. You wouldn’t survive 5 minutes on the street, that’s for sure. Nice way you all have of twisting my words around.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 8:52 pm

          Oh, shove it up your ass, billyboy. As a cop, I trashed dozens of your kind; poor, downtrodden, knuckle-draggers from the inner city – each and every one of them with a chip on their shoulder the size of Montana.

          Survival “on the street” is not combat, it is not war, you stupid motherfucker. If you think the shit-heads you met “on the streets” are the same as Muslim “holy-warriors”, you’re a fucking clown.

          Shut the fuck up, Bozo.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:07 pm

          billybob wrote:

          “Fuck you guys. I lived and survived on the streets at one point in my life – in a tough neighbourhood. I don’t think any of you armchair warriors know what you are talking about. You wouldn’t survive 5 minutes on the street, that’s for sure. Nice way you all have of twisting my words around.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          From one armchair warrior, to another …no one’s “twisting your words around”!

          It’s all right there in black ‘n white and now you’re playing the victim? Thought you were a tough guy.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:20 pm

          Thank you, Undaunted.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:29 pm

          billybob wrote:

          Fuck you guys. I lived and survived on the streets at one point in my life – in a tough neighbourhood. I don’t think any of you armchair warriors know what you are talking about. You wouldn’t survive 5 minutes on the street, that’s for sure.
          ………………………….

          Actually, I was homeless on the street as a teenager after having run away from an abusive home. Very grim–I’m grad you got off the street.

          But the idea that this means someone hence believes that self-defense is “persecution” does not automatically follow.

          More:

          Nice way you all have of twisting my words around.
          ………………………….

          If you believe I was mistaken in my interpretation of your stance, please say so. Don’t just say “F*ck you guys”. That is not an argument.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:38 pm

          “grad” should be “glad”

      • Peggy says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 11:33 pm

        If able to kick ass it’s great and I would encourage anyone to do that but we all have to assess the situation and first make sure that we can cope.
        In this case, this was exactly what should have been done. I’m sure the scum didn’t expect to be beaten by one guy.
        Next time they might be a little less eager to start a fight.

        • billybob says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 6:51 am

          @gravenimage

          In response to your comments of last night, I will apologize for aiming a “fuck you guys” in your general direction. I should have been more specific and only aimed it at this fraud Undaunted who said the same to me, but I was a little upset with you as well for twisting my words around to make my argument seem to be about something it was not.

          I guess I will begin with your last comment since it happens to be in my copy buffer at the moment…

          But the idea that this means someone hence believes that self-defense is “persecution” does not automatically follow.

          Which also ties in with your earlier statement…

          Good God–what crap. A man protecting his wife from an attack by a Muslim mob is not a “vigilante”–everyone has, or should have, the right of self defense.

          And you really believe that preventing Muslims from beating up, raping, or murdering your wife is *persecution*? Good grief…

          Look again at my comments. At no point did I ever criticize the actions of the man. He was merely defending his wife, and his actions were commendable, even heroic.

          I’m not sure who the “vigilantes” are I spoke of, but I had in mind people like Undaunted in general. People who applaud vigilante action – not mere self defense. We run into these types dailey on the internet in such discussions. I suppose you can’t have been expected to read my mind, and therefore you assumed I was criticizing a man defending his wife, but I still can’t believe you think I would call him a vigilante.

          Then you said…

          Her “big mouth”? Now you believe that women should not be allowed to speak to unrelated men–in the *free West*?

          Why would you assume I “believe that women should not be allowed to speak to unrelated men–in the *free West*”? I made no such implication. I was implying that she was imprudent – only. Of course she has every right to say whatever pops into her head, and nobody has any right to respond with violence no matter what she says, however impudent. I will amplify on this “imprudence” later.

          Then you relate an antidote where you spoke up to someone who’s dog was unleashed and you said…

          Do you believe I should have been beaten up by eight men for daring to open my “big mouth” and speak to unrelated men?

          Completely a strawman argument. Of course I don’t believe you should be beaten up. What a silly thing to say. You speaking up in the given situation was entirely appropriate, as demonstrated by the fact you were in polite company. Very different than the situation in the article where this woman was very naive if she assumed she was in polite company.

          So then you say…

          the rule of law does not allow Muslims to beat a woman for speaking to them, nor does it prevent us from fighting back if attacked. I’m not sure why you would believe it does.

          And that is totally twisting my words, because nowhere did I say I believe a woman should be beaten for speaking, nor the man condemned for fighting back. I believe quite the contrary, as just stated above.

          And again, referring to my condemnation of vigilantes you respond…

          The idea that the law as it now stands allows mobs of Muslims to beat a woman in the street but prevents defending against same is utterly mistaken.

          That is totally unrelated to my comments. Of course the law does not act as you stated, nor did I ever imply that.

          Then you say…

          Then why do you have a problem with this man protecting his wife from being beaten…

          Of course I have no problem with this man protecting his wife …and now it becomes clear to me that somehow you really thought I was condemning the actions of this heroic man rather than those whom I referred to as “vigilantes”. I suppose all you have said is understandable in light of that. I guess I could have made myself clearer. It seems something triggered me.

          So finally, you state…

          Her letting them know that what they were doing violated the law was *not* “looking for trouble”. In a civilized society, notifying someone that they are–perhaps unwittingly, as in the case of the dog walkers–is not illegal, nor does is constitute grounds for Muslims to assault us.

          Here is where I disagree completely except for the last bit. This woman wasn’t in a “civilized society”. She was among a group of Muslims. Need I say more? Therefore, she was imprudent. Either she was naive, or she was looking for trouble, just as on the street you see some big lug with a loud ghetto blaster on his shoulder, accompanied by a bunch of thugs, and you walk up to him and tell him to turn it down. See what I’m sayin’ here? Just because the guys in the story were Muslims we don’t suddenly forget how we survived on the street.

          Everyone has their own way to survive around thugs. Like maybe speak softly but carry a big stick, or maybe like the Muslims do with us – smile at them outwardly but curse them in your heart. See what I’m saying? If we take that story, and change the cast of characters so they weren’t Muslims on a beach, but rather, just a gang of common thugs on the street in a tough neighbourhood, wouldn’t you also agree the woman would be imprudent to speak out as she did?

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 7:29 pm

          Well, thank you for your lengthy reply, billybob.

          I will just say that it is unlikely that Liana Tyrrell knew that this was a threatening Muslim mob before mentioning that crab fishing was not allowed at the beach.

          For one thing, many members of the mob showed up later after having been called–it sounds as though she just saw three men, one of whom had a crab pot. The situation at that point may not have looked threatening at all–it may not even have been initially clear that they were Muslim.

          Of course, if we reach the point where we dare not tell Muslims any thing they might not want to hear, then we have also essentially surrendered to them–also a less than ideal situation.

  15. Debi Brand says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 2:09 pm

    “Is Australia really enriched by admitting large numbers of people who believe that women who tell men in any circumstances what to do should be rewarded with violence, and their husbands should “teach them a lesson”?”

    “How?”

    “And this is no isolated case: since these attitudes are founded on the Qur’an, which tells men to beat women from whom they fear disobedience (4:34), there will be many more such cases.”

    Indeed, Robert.

    And for such reasons and more, as stated in the essay at the link below, “because that is basic fact, we are fools, fools, fools to allow the Muslim the freedom to practice here in our nation, the tenets of their faith. Fools!”

    http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-prophet-waged-war-by-means-of.html

    • Peggy says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 3:13 pm

      Most of us clearly didn’t listen when the Lebanese Christians tried to warn us about importing Muslims.

      Now that we know, we should write to our MPs and vote differently.

      • Debi Brand says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 9:20 pm

        Amen. Peggy.

        Act on your knowledge of Islam or pay to the adherents to it the price the coward pays.

  16. marty says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 2:57 pm

    muslims only attack women and children and unarmed men and, then, only if they vastly outnumber their victims. these inbred and mentally deficient sociopaths are cowards and thugs.

    • Undaunted says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 3:54 pm

      So, since they’re such pussies and retards, what’s your plan if they ever decide to attack you and your loved ones?

      • Byzantium1683 says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 9:32 pm

        …correct this time.

        While they are generally cowards, that is a simplification. They WILL attack when outnumbered, even if its just by bomb.

        Many wars have been lost by underestimating the enemy, however true the insults are.

        • Undaunted says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:29 pm

          Brilliant.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:48 pm

          Undanunted, please note the two nasty comments that “Byzantium1683” wrote about you above on this thread:

          Byzantium1683 says
          January 4, 2017 at 9:14 pm

          You are a pea-brained Idiot when it comes to normal human interaction and reading, but I must still respect your Service. I know combined the positive part means nothing, but its true.

          Just like how Vietnam soldiers must be respected, even though the war was stupid. Actually nothing like that, because I have nothing against any of them.

          And this nasty comment just below that one:

          byzantium1683 says
          January 4, 2017 at 10:38 pm

          Sorry Cecilla, I meant no insults towards you. And with all respect, you don’t understand ATM. Let me explain my side of this.

          When I clicked on you, I was agreeing with your statement about undaunted’s Police service, while also calling him an idiot because he is. I was going to say I accidentally clicked on you, but I did it intentionally.

          Again, are you stupid Champ? If I am attacking Undaunted, does it matter where I do it? He will still see. No cowardice whatsoever. The only problem with not linking directly to him is that it involves innocents, like Cecilla here.

          Also, I already apologized for saying fuck you to you. but wait, don’t say my apology sucks, I know it does. You have heaped so many insults upon me, that any insult I accidentally give to you is well deserved.

          BTW, thanks for admitting I did not target Cecilla with that post. While you twist much else, you stuck to the truth there.

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 10:50 pm

          oops: Undaunted

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:07 pm

          “Byzantium1683” wrote:

          “You have heaped so many insults upon me, that any insult I accidentally give to you is well deserved.”

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          More fiction from the bizarre “Byzantium1683” …

          How does someone “accidentally” give an insult? That’s a new one even from someone who’s playing the victim so well. Wow that’s quite an imaginary achievement, I must say …nevertheless it’s impossible to “accidentally” insult anyone. Sorry if that comes as a shock to your …sensibilities (cough!).

        • Champ says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 11:20 pm

          “Again, are you stupid Champ?”

          Nope. But you are. Obviously.

        • byzantium1683 says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 1:33 pm

          Undaunted showed on this thread he can move past differences. Also, he recognized the value of my statement, which was unrelated to our disagreement.

          I apologize for my statement about his intelligence when also supporting his police service, that was semi-random and uncalled for. However, I still think he is a musclehead, considering how quick he was to fire salvos of insults at mortimer and me. I will not necessarily take back all my statements, not nearly.

  17. Sam says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 3:24 pm

    Islam must be banned all over the world. That is really the only solution for humanity.

    • Undaunted says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 4:02 pm

      Since there are over a billion of these morons, how do you suggest the ban on Islam be implemented and enforced?

      • Debi Brand says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 9:32 pm

        We start to that goal by, first, acknowledging that goal is the only honest answer our world can afford if we are to deal with Islam on a fact base basis.

        Next, we elect leaders with the courage to level with the above stated fact. And in that leader, given the source of Islam, in that leader must reside, the wisdom and the willingness to seek the counsel and guiding of Almighty God to engage the evil Islam is.

        Until those two stated points are, ‘ no need wasting time on further steps planned. In brief.

      • Byzantium1683 says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 9:35 pm

        I think a ban, or solid borders, is a good plan. Better than killing them all.

        However, it is not so easy in the modern world to block the enemy, as it was in the past.

        For example, even isolated countries may get nukes (though its harder than it sounds) and then things get bad. And there will always be sympathizers.

        Heck, pakistan already is nuclear.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 7:41 pm

          No one was talking about “killing them all”.

          Why do so many assume that if you talk about defending yourself against Muslim violence, that you are advocating genocide?

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 5, 2017 at 9:05 pm

        Like this:

        “Total War: Extinguishing Islam from Earth” @dantriplett

        https://medium.com/@dantriplett/islamic-jihad-is-total-war-for-all-marbles-6c858098b76e

        • Debi Brand says

          Jan 6, 2017 at 1:10 am

          “Total War: Extinguishing Islam from Earth” @dantriplett

          https://medium.com/@dantriplett/islamic-jihad-is-total-war-for-all-marbles-6c858098b76e

          Good work,Dan.

          “I’ll tell you what war is all about. It’s about killing people. If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting. ”

          Indeed.

          And unless we are cold on that reality, “playing” that ” game” to win by those rules, what are we doing in any war?

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 6, 2017 at 6:09 am

          Thanks Debi.

          I appreciate your taking the time to read my essay and strategy. It’s a work in progress, and is really more of an abstract for a book I’m trying to find the time to organize and author. I have plenty of material already.

          In any war, the rules are determined by the tactics our enemy elects to use on us. The Iranians are working around the clock to do the same thing to us that we should be doing to them right now. We should be neutering them while they’re still loading their gun. They’re full-throttle nuts, and are deadly serious about nuking us and Israel, along with the rest of Earth’s Kaffir.

          The Ummah is pointing their gun at us, loading it as fast as they can. It’s time to hit them first and very hard, before they have a chance to pull the trigger. Talking and 2000 pound bombs won’t cut it anymore. It’s time for the “Big Guns.” We need to scare the shit out of them, and make it real clear that we’ll keep glassing them, one random Dar al-Islam target every 72 hours until they surrender Islam. They need to see for themselves Allah is never going to save them.

          That will earn us their respect. Only then will their ears be available for re-indoctrination from experts like Robert who can explain the foolishness of their faith, and offer them a viable alternative.

          Turning 1.6 Billion Muslims into 1.6 Billion Atheists is a bad plan in my opinion. Religion is their entire life, and Atheism would be too foreign a concept for them. They need a righteous and loving God, as most of us do, including me. We should encourage Christianity, but not force it.

          Otherwise, if left on their own, they’re just as likely to invent some new, even crazier, more dangerous religion than Islam. We must strangle any such craziness while it’s still in the cradle, as someone should’ve done with Muhammad before he caused all the havoc. Steering them toward Christ, the Prince of Peace, would be a great plan, and would make them harmless welcomed partners in the community of 2.2 Billion Christians of His Earth.

          Stay strong Sister. We have a huge fight ahead of us.

        • Debi Brand says

          Jan 6, 2017 at 2:21 pm

          Amen, Dan (responding here to your 6 January 2017, 0609 post).

          Across the board. I hear you.

          My son, Sgt. Emerson Noah Brand, was among those who, in the words of his first “OIF” deployment, LTC, were “trained killers in unbelievable physical condition: they could rappel down the face of a cliff, road march twenty-five miles, shoot their weapons with pinpoint precision, put a Claymore in blindfolded, and be a ruthless hand-to-hand killer.” (Sassaman, Warrior King, P. 257.)Yet when they put such skills to task–acted as if in this war they had been sent to they were in fact supposed to, in the shortest amount of time, using all at our disposal, to eliminate the enemy—they had their hands “slapped.”

          And that LTC.’s name– LT. COL. [RET] Nathan Sassaman –is thus one whose name is and will remain absent from the long list of both civilian and Military leaders who agreed to spend lives and limbs following a fool-headed “war-plan.” For that reason, for such unwillingness, early on in this war he too became a casualty of it.

          In his book mentioned above, “Warrior King,” citing General George S. Patton JR, Sassaman provides the following Patton-ethos–the ethos LTC. Sassaman learned and learned well, believed in, lived by, led by, and for that reason, as stated above, early on in this war, LTC. Sassaman proved himself a Warrior out of place, “unfit” for this “battle”:

          There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time. —General George S. Patton. JR.

          (WARRIOR KING, THE TRIUMP AND BETRAYAL OF AN AMERICAN COMMANDER IN IRAQ, LT.COL. [RET] NATHAN SASSAMAN, with Joe Layden, ST. Martin’s Press, New York, First Edition, 2008. P.88)

          Thus, Sassaman wrote of Iraq, “The U.S. military is saddled with a generation of senior officers interested primarily in survival in Iraq.” He writes, these said leaders “do not possess the intestinal fortitude” of the above-cited General Patton principle of warfare: “the willingness to use overwhelming force to absolutely crush the spirit of an opposing force.” (Ibid.)

          Sassaman provides, “Niceties too often were valued over common sense and safety.” He asserts, “We clearly lost sight of our primary purpose—to destroy the enemy with overwhelming force at every opportunity—and somehow drifted toward a twisted policy that aimed to make the fight as fair as possible.” (Ibid, P. 89.)

          That is why–because the above-cited ethos was ruled outdated, thus, unwanted; so too, in far too many instances, in both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, men that lived by it–today we have IS. Today we have in our nation and elsewhere flexing and strutting children of “Muhammad.” The wishes and desires of the Ummah, all too often, acquiesced to.

          All our cost so far in our so-called “War on Terror,” have been but waste. Tossed to wind. Spent in pursuit of a pipedream: the fool-headed goal of winning hearts and minds sworn to follow the teaching of Qur’an and the traditions of the “Prophet,” while we praise Islam. Promote the myth of its nobility, its peacefulness, its proud-worthiness. So too, its moderate version.

          http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-prophet-waged-war-by-means-of.html

          http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2016/08/omar-siddiqui-mateen-obeyed-allah.html

          your comrade in this fight, dl

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 4:52 am

          Debi

          I’m so deeply sorry for your sacrifice, and the service and sacrifice of Emerson. I didn’t realize until just now that I’m speaking with a Gold Star Mother, one who’s laid the life of her son upon the Altar of Freedom. I can only imagine how painful that must be for you. A pain that never goes away, and has laid a cost upon you that few will ever know.

          To have lived to serve his country, answering his country’s call with his life, asking to go again for another deployment, is a life well lived, and speaks volumes about your son and his love for America. Although nothing can bring him back to you, you have the special privilege, like so few others, of looking at our American Flag, knowing the heroism and sacrifices of Emerson and a handful of others who belong to his very exclusive fraternity, are the reason that flag flies with such pride, and the reason the rest of us live under the umbrella of its Freedom.

          I watched the tribute and parade route of your son’s procession, and it brought me to tears. It’s certainly a befitting tribute to the sacrifice of an American son to all of us, in addition to you. There was a whole lot of love lining those streets. The headstone you selected is also befitting of a Crusader. I can’t imagine a better choice.

          Nothing chokes me up more than a man who sacrifices his life for America’s Freedom. I’m proud of your son, and have no doubt your pride in him is stronger than the sun shines bright. I was a C-5 Pilot for 12 years based at Dover AFB, DE, our National Morgue. Every KIA is repatriated through Dover. The most difficult part of my assignment there wasn’t getting targeted by the Muslims trying to shoot my airplane out of the sky on a weekly basis. It was the repatriations.

          Our Base Chaplain, John Groth, was the sweetest, kindest, warmest, most spiritual man I’ve known. Everyone loved him. But he finally broke, and had to resign. He’s human, and he just couldn’t take it anymore. One more Last Rites or Repatriation would’ve killed his soul. We were all sad to see the man who brought solace to our hearts leave the front gate for the last time.

          I’d usually land at about 3 in the morning. The Senior Ranking Officer in Delaware was always present. It was often freezing with blowing snow, but there would be the Honor Guard, sharp as a tack, with perfect uniforms. Each Service had their own Honor Guard crew to repatriate their own back to the Motherland, and at times I had all four Services represented. The Chaplain would say a prayer, and I’d line up my crew on the forward ramp, saluting each brave American as he left our jet to the inconsolable cries of their parents, widows, and orphans.

          Repatriating just one fallen soldier in ceremony is something a USAF Aircraft Commander never forgets. Personally repatriating 337 of our bravest Americans changed who I am as a person. They altered my soul forever. And while I couldn’t possibly compare the pain I felt, and still feel, to yours, I can tell you that each one became more and more painful. Thinking about what that man gave up for all of us, and imagining how his loved ones will never be the same again. I still weep about it two or three times per week, all these years later.

          I have a 5-year old son, my only child. If he ever dies in combat, I don’t think I’d ever stop crying. My life would come to an unrecoverable halt, and I’d shortly die broken-hearted.

          So I’m both impressed and proud of you Debi, for picking up the pieces and continuing the fight for him, for your country, and for our Lord. I’m certain Emerson is proud of you too. That you speak out against Islam and the Ummah with your outspoken writings no doubt makes your son happy, as he watches you with a proud smile at the right hand of our Lord, telling Him, “That’s my Mom, spending her time wisely on Earth fighting evil!” Your efforts no doubt take special notice with our Lord and Savior. And I’m certain He has a special place for parents like you who must endure the pain of sacrificing a child fighting for The future of His Kingdom on Earth and in Heaven.

          Thank you for your sacrifice Debi. May the strength of our Lord be with you always.

          https://youtu.be/MCVkH1sZL08

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 5:24 am

          There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wound, death, and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time. —General George S. Patton. JR.

          I had to put this in a separate post Debi, but I wanted to thank you for sharing it. It’s so true.

          There are two kinds of leaders in today’s military: Politicians, and War Fighters.

          Sadly, the days of Sherman, Pershing, MacArthur, Chesty Puller, LeMay, and Patton seem to be behind us. Men with the balls to kill millions, and tell the President exactly what he needs to hear.

          I believe President Trump is the perfect leader for this most critical point in World history. Although he didn’t himself serve, he did spend five years in a military boarding school for high school. He was always first in his class and everything else. Our military loves him, which is so very important. While Obama was smoking weed, staring at Che Guevara posters on his wall, President Trump was looking at posters of America’s most lethal military ass-kickers on his wall. Those are the guys for whom he has the greatest reverence.

          He even said of General Mattis, our new SECDEF, “He’s the closest thing to Patton we have.”

          I’m confident DJT, for now, is simply choosing his words carefully about how he phrases the Islamic problem, even inserting the BS “radical” prefix at times, but I believe he’s no idiot, and knows the real deal. He’s not in charge yet, but on 20 January 2017, the gloves will come off, and we’re going to hear the uncensored Donald Trump in whom we all came to believe to deliver us from evil. He’ll be the only man on Earth beholden to no one.

          I think he’s already forming Alliances with the Kaffir nuke states, beginning with Israel, Russia, and China. We’ll need them all, along with France, UK, and India, of course, if we’re truly going to extinguish Islam. The time has come. Armageddon is here. Let’s get this fight started and let the nukes fly while we still have the advantage, because it won’t last forever.

          If we stand around with our hands in our pockets, and Tel Aviv, Manhattan, or DC gets vaped, it will have been the greatest under-reaction in World history. The N Korean, Pakistani, and Iranian nuke threats need to be neutralized yesterday. DJT has already said he has no problems using nukes if necessary. He’s no idiot, and he’s surrounded himself with some very bright people.

          I thank God he won.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 8:08 pm

      We have isolated Islam in the past, and it had worked well. Inviting these barbarians into our own nations was our mistake.

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 5, 2017 at 9:15 pm

        With due respect, how well is that working with Iran or N Korea, the most isolated, contained country on the planet?

        N Korea successfully tested their first H-bomb last year, and they now have demonstrated the ability to launch missiles from submerged submarines: The ultimate F-you card that every nation covets.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 7:52 pm

          North Korea has not successfully threatened its neighbors for over sixty years now. It does a lot of ugly saber rattling, but in practical terms is pretty contained. Even China warns them to toe the line when they start getting too bellicose.

          The problem with Iran is that it is not isolated *enough*. Russia has been playing footsie with them for years, and is enabling the nuclear program there.

          The United States had–wisely–cut off all relations with them for over thirty-five years until Obama began his disastrous appeasement of them–a policy I hope Donald Trump will reverse.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 8, 2017 at 10:18 am

          @gravenimage

          Respectfully, as always:

          First, N Korea:

          What good is “containing” N Korea doing if they’re building Thermonuclear Hydrogen Bombs and ICBMs?

          Three people are required to use any US nuclear weapon. The POTUS plus 2 Military Officers. The POTUS cannot launch any nuke by himself. Can’t happen. The 2 Military Officers each have a sidearm to kill the other guy if he goes rogue. He couldn’t go rogue anyway without the “codes” from the POTUS. Point being, the US, as I’m sure all other Kaffir nuke states as well, have safety measures in place to prevent any one man from launching the Apocalypse.

          Do you think N Korea has such safety measures, or could that crazy punk order a nuke strike all on his own? I’m guessing he can do it on his own. Why would a mad dictator like that share any authority with anyone else in his government?

          We’re talking about a crazy guy who, if he doesn’t like the way you part your hair, or any other such stupid reason, executes people, to include his own family.

          Within the last year alone, he had his own uncle, a 4-Star General, stripped naked and fed alive to a pack of 150 starving dogs. To another one of his Generals, from whom he didn’t feel the right kind of loyalty, he executed him by a firing squad of Anti-Aircraft Artillery guns. Everyone around him is paranoid they could be next. Kim Jong Un is an unstable, unpredictable punk, with 10 H-Bomb warheads, and building more as fast as he can. He threatens his neighbors, like Japan, on a weekly basis. Being contained, with no one watching him, he’s aggressively pursuing a program to miniaturize the warheads to mount them atop ICBMs. He may not master this tomorrow, but in 10 years? Maybe.

          Moreover, every time he tests a nuke, a team of Iranians is on site to take notes and share technology. This sounds like a very dangerous partnership to me. Why do you think LESS supervision of their antics makes the situation safer for us and the World?

          Why do you think we’ve had 28,500 US Forces in S Korea for the last 60 years if N Korea is no threat?

          Second, Iran:

          Russia’s relationship with them is no doubt troubling. Although they’ve provided them with many advanced weapon systems, including nuclear reactors, they’ve not shared nuclear warheads or ICBMs with them. They’ve had to figure that out on their own, or with the help of N Korea.

          Keep in mind also, Putin has good reason to be concerned about our “alliance” with Saudi Arabia and most of the Gulf States too. Can you blame him? Remember the Saudis, the great friends who produced bin Laden and 15 of 19 9/11 hijackers? The people who export Wahhabi Islam all over the World, building hundreds of mosques and madrasas right here in America? We’re selling them fighter jets and all kinds of advanced weaponry, so it’s mighty hypocritical of us to be condemning the Russo/Iranian relationship.

          I understand you and I have two different strategies regarding Islam. I propose Worldwide criminalization, and if I’m not mistaken, you propose “Containment.”

          And while the Obama Iranian Nuclear Deal is treasonous, you suggest we go back to the Pre-Obama plan of staying hands off and ignoring Iran. Do you still feel that way? Even with their thousands of centrifuges and secret nuke production facilities, along with their mandatory Friday “Death to America,” and “Death to Israel” public prayers, i.e. policy? Because that has trouble written all over it as far as I’m concerned. Netanyahu feels the same way. Do you think he’ll stay hands off with Iran forever?

          Iran WILL get nukes going this route, if they don’t have them already, which some Intel analysts estimate they do. They’re just waiting to amass dozens of them and perfect their ICBM technology before launching the Apocalypse.

          How does Containment protect us from Iranian ICBMs, nuke on a container ship, or nuke in a U-Haul driven into Times Square? It can’t. That’s the problem with Containment. We must consider the long game here. It’s not just about protecting our own hides for the next 10 years. It’s about protecting the Earth for our Great-great-great grandchildren. And that means eliminating Islam entirely, forcing its criminalization everywhere on Earth. Just like Nazism and Shintoism.

          Regarding Russia, if you’ve ever read the 12-minute abbreviated version of my strategy, we can’t extinguish Islam from Earth without an Alliance with UK, France, Israel, India, China, AND Russia.

          So, what to do, what to do…about Russia. Personally, I believe Putin and Trump seek friendship not to drink Vodka and play golf, but to carve up Dar al-Islam, sans Islam. Trump and Netanyahu are obviously quite close. And I’ve read that DJT’s relationship with the Chinese is much friendlier than his public trade-imbalance complaints would suggest.

          Point being: I believe President Trump, though not yet in charge so he must choose his words very carefully regarding Islam/Muslims, DOES in fact see the existential problem with Islam, and he aims to eliminate the problem. Neither Putin, Netanyahu, nor Trump can come right out and declare war on 1.6 Billion Muslims…yet. Not until they’ve formed their Alliance…post 20JAN2017, and not until they’ve had time to develop the war plan. To do otherwise would be stupid. It’d be like broadcasting to the Nazis we plan to land at Normandy in a few months. Israel would be overrun with Muslims next week. So now is not the time to say “Islam” is the whole problem. That’s why Netanyahu is very careful to say “militant” Islam, and both Trump and Putin are careful to say “radical” Islam. It’s not that they’re stupid. I think they know “Islam” is the problem. But if they say that now, they’ll have 1.6 Billion Ummah running a Banzai charge at them, and they’re not prepared yet for that.

          Anyway, I believe all Kaffir, including the US, must divorce all Dar al-Islam states. So, that means WE must give up our pretend friendship with Saudi, and all the rest of them, and Russia must divorce Iran. To encourage Russia to get in bed with us, we could let them annex Iran for Russia. What do you believe is more important to Putin, his loyalty to that crazy Ayatollah, or adding all that warm water access, oil rich Iranian territory to the Russian empire? I’m guessing he’d help us eliminate the Iranian government and destroy their nuke program if we’d show some good-faith too in divorcing all our Muslim “allies.”

          We’re on the doorstep of WWIII. This fact isn’t lost on the heavyweights like Trump, Putin, and Netanyahu.

          If you’ve never read my strategy, please give it a look when you have about 10 minutes. FWIW, every time I poll test it on Twitter, hundreds vote, and 75 – 85% always vote “Yes” to the question, “Do you agree with my strategy?”

          https://medium.com/@dantriplett/islamic-jihad-is-total-war-for-all-marbles-6c858098b76e#.9apgoprja

          I’m trying to find the time to extend it out into a book, or at least a 15-minute YouTube video that people would be willing to spend time watching. I have plenty of material. I just need the time.

  18. efr says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 5:50 pm

    There’s hope.

  19. Damocles Junior says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 5:52 pm

    Only slightly off-topic:

    Does anyone, either readers or even JW staff know anything about the TRUTH behind the present row between Muslim Indonesia and Australia regarding defence cooperation?

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 6:06 pm

      My reading of it is that it’s a ‘test’ of some kind. Throw a tantrum over an excuse, and then watch how we respond.

      I see it as ‘grooming’. Muslim-dominated suffused-with-Islam Indonesia has been assiduously ‘grooming’ Australia into a dhimmi mindset for yonks. Lots of goodcop/ badcop stuff. But the main aim is to get us tippytoeing round them, walking on eggshells less the Perpetually Outraged throw a tantrum, apologising profusely for every imagined slight, and agreeing with them about everything.

      Their main weapon is economic – the ‘bribe’ of their beef markets. Behind that is an implicit threat – they have millions of people not so very far away across the sea.

      Personally, I’m all for breaking off relations and having as little to do with malevolent Muslim Indonesia as possible. STOP handing them knowledge of our terrain and our military’s methods and capabilities.

      Reorient, instead, resolutely toward our free and semi-free non-Muslim neighbours in the region – above all, India, but also of course Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, Japan. Trade with *them*. Relate with *them*. And… resist the Jihad right alongside them.

      • Eric Jones says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 6:22 pm

        Much can be said for isolatinhg muslim countries as much as possible from the rest of the world. No trade. No immigration. No student or cultural exchanges. Aid muslim refugees in the country they are already in. It must get to the point where it is too costly to be a jihadi.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 5, 2017 at 9:19 pm

          We tried that strategy with N Korea, and failed.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 8:27 pm

          North Korea has not been a serious threat for over sixty years now. That seems like a success to me.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 8:10 pm

        All good points, DDA.

        • Damocles Junior says

          Jan 4, 2017 at 9:25 pm

          Thank you dumbledoresarmy, Eric & Graven image for your thoughts;

          My thoughts, yes, the thin skinned Muslim neighbours to our north would like us to be walking on egg shells, they hate us, they envy us, they resent us and they have recently been humiliated over animal cruelty and people smuggling issues. Many thinking people here in Australia have questioned our very close defence co-operation with Indonesia. There is also the issue of considerable support here for the Free Papua Movement.

          Our defence minister seems to be in damage control over all of this.This is wrong, it is effectively bowing down to them. A good robust discussion just might help clear the air.

          I would like to see good friendly relations with Indonesia but it has to be on mutual respect and understanding of our two totally different nations.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 8:30 pm

          DJ, I would like to see civilized Australia have as little to do with Muslim Indonesia and Malaysia as possible.

      • byzantium1683 says

        Jan 5, 2017 at 1:38 pm

        Ha, Beef markets? Can’t pork replace some of that? (not that I love pork, but you know what I mean)

        Yes, coordinate with Kuffar countries. Indonesia was once almost a colony-why bow down to it now.

        Stupid how people say “they are our police, our doctors, our so and so” Why can’t we get immigrants who do just as good but don’t blow up?

  20. American-Pragmatism says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 6:01 pm

    Look. A hero.

  21. Mac-101 says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 6:01 pm

    This LTC needs to run for Political Office and reestablish the rule of Law over Australia. Take her back from the Globalist NWO who will not only enslave, but murder us ALL in the end!

  22. gravenimage says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 6:18 pm

    Australia: Eight Muslims attack woman, her husband fights them off
    ……………………………..

    Wow! Bravo Iraq War vet Kyle Tyrrell for protecting his wife! This guy is a hero!

    And kudos to his wife Liana for not ignoring these Muslim thugs flouting civilized Infidel laws to begin with.

    These two give me hope for the West.

    • Champ says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 6:23 pm

      Hear, hear, Graven! I concur.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 4, 2017 at 8:11 pm

        🙂

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 6:08 pm

      If he’s an Iraq war veteran then he would know quite a bit – not necessarily consciously, but instinctively – about how to deal with mohammedthugs in street combat. The fact that he could hold his own against 8 of them tells me that his training – and experience – kicked in.

      The Mohammedans miscalculated, but, big, when they attacked him.

      i am reminded of something that happened some time ago, also in Australia, but on a city back-street.

      An Aussie guy who happened *also* to be Israeli with combat experience was walking down a street with an IDF T-shirt on, minding his own business. A group of mohammedthugs (I forget exactly how many) attacked him. (He had said and done nothing whatsoever; he had not sought any interaction at all).

      His training kicked in at once and he attacked right back… whilst also shouting very rude things at them in *Arabic*, which he had picked up whilst in Israel. (This, I gather from the story, totally threw them; they did not expect it at all). He suffered some injuries, but he defeated the mohammedan mobsters, who (if I recall correctly) limped off with their tails between their legs.

      Thought for the day: quite a *lot* of Aussies, by now, have seen service in the mohammedan badlands of Iraq, Afghanistan, and for that matter, a little longer ago, in Somalia (UN peacekeeping). Lots have returned, and been demobbed, for one reason or another. That means that any random crowd of Aussies *could* have in it someone who has been up against mohammedans in mortal combat.

      Perhaps a few more incidents like this one may encourage the mohammedan mobsters to pull their horns in a bit… because they just *will not know* whether the mild-mannered, perhaps even besuited and plumpish and slightly-greying paterfamilias in front of them, is not in fact someone who can *kick the sh*t out of them* if they try anything… because not so many years ago that was exactly what he was doing in the field of combat, and moreover, he knows *exactly* how they operate, he knows *exactly* what kinds of dirty tricks they will try to pull.

      Moreover: as well as the Aussie blokes who’ve fought in the *Mohammedan* territories, we have plenty of still-fairly-fit old blokes who are **Vietnam veterans**. Wait till some mohammedthug picks on some old bloke – perhaps attempting to molest the guy’s little grand-daughter – and finds out, too late, that he’s ‘triggered’ a Vietnam vet…

  23. somehistory says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 6:25 pm

    If the gang that belongs to islam were looked at like any other criminal gang, it could be named a criminal enterprise and thus would be illegal. It would still be legal to *belong* to the enterprise, but not to practice any of what islam teaches. If someone did any of what islam teaches, that person would be a lawbreaker and subject to legal penalties.

    Further, when it was found to be gaining funding through extortion, drug smuggling, sex slavery, sexual abuse of children…all of which are illegal… those who do those things, which are regularly done by moslims, could be prosecuted under RICO.

    islam is a criminal enterprise in the business of extortion, drug smuggling, sex slavery, and sexual abuse of children. All that needs to be done is to declare it such.

    Then, when moslims do what these ones attempted, and the couple had to defend themselves and their daughter, the police would lock up all of those ones illegally poaching in a reserve. It is likely to happen here. With the increase in the numbers being brought in and the likelihood that a woman will at some point tell one of them something is not allowed, there will be assaults.

    • don vito says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 7:47 pm

      Precisely what the Meccans faced in dealing with Mo and the Submitters.

  24. TheBuffster says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 7:05 pm

    The stupidest thing is that the woman was *warning* the guy that he was about to break the law. In other words, if he got caught, there would be penalties. She was doing him a favor.

    She could have kept her mouth shut and gone to call the authorities on him. But she did the considerate thing. She acted in good faith.

    But the idiot and his mates were so steeped in emotional, knee-jerk male and islamic supremacy that such a rational and benevolent interpretation of the situation was off of their radar.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 8:44 pm

      Exactly, Buffster.

      And Happy New Year to you and yours!

  25. abad says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 7:20 pm

    Good for him, and granted, Muslims really do need to be put in their place, which leads me to ask, I thought Australia shut their borders to Muslims?

    Muslims really do not belong in Australia.

  26. CrankyWW says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 8:44 pm

    A REAL man protects women. Mr. Tyrell is a REAL man.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 8:58 pm

      Hear, hear!

  27. freedom says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 8:57 pm

    I tend to agree with Mortimer.
    Who says such confrontations should be dealt with WORDS.
    Personally, I would use the word—– Bunnings
    It’s written on the side of my crowbar —— whooshka.

    • LR says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 2:57 am

      Hahahah…

    • Pumbar says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 3:47 am

      Other hardware stores are available.

    • Champ says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 3:59 am

      Good one, Freedom! lol! 😀

  28. Gray says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 9:08 pm

    I’m just so angry at all the milk sops on this site, criticising the woman for saying anything, and the man for then trying to protect his wife. For starters, I’m sure it was simply an act of courtesy, on the woman’s part, to tell the men that fishing there was against the law. Most non-Muslim Australians would react with a: ‘Oh, is it? Sorry, I didn’t know. Thanks for telling me. I’ll go somewhere else.’ Then the man was quite justified in protecting his wife when she was attacked, because(one assumes) there were no police officers present at the time, who would protect the woman for him. The man was a concerned citizen, not a vigilante. International readers may also care to remember the appalling history of Muslim/kaffur interaction in Australia, from the siege of Broken Hill and earlier. Leaving aside some obvious recent examples – the Lindt Café siege, the murder of a Police accountant – could I just mention two egregious examples: the so-called ‘Cronulla Beach riots’ were precipitated by a group of Lebanese Muslims going up to an off-duty life guard and saying, in effect, ‘This is our beach now. If you don’t leave immediately, we will kill you.’ The life guard responded, saying – ‘ I spend my weekends here, rescuing people like you, so shove off.’ The gang then beat the man senseless. Egregious example two: The Skaf brothers, who happened to be Lebanese Muslims, went on an bextended rape spree in Western Sydney, targeting Christian women as victims. While the women were being raped, they were verbally abused as ‘Aussie sluts’ and ‘Aussie whores’ and were asked, ‘how do you like being fu**** Leb style?’ This is just the tip of the iceberg, and the situation will only get worse. Mr Tyrrell was fully justified in not giving this vermin any ‘benefit of the doubt,’ and in acting as he did.

  29. Ashley says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 9:18 pm

    ‘I would do the same thing again in a heartbeat, in fact I would do the same thing for any woman I saw in that situation not just my wife…’
    ____________________________

    This is why I feel safer with the Terrells and Undaunteds roaming this world…

    • Champ says

      Jan 4, 2017 at 9:53 pm

      Indeed, Ashley! Great comment and I completely agree 🙂

    • byzantium1683 says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 12:16 pm

      Im not sure he is helping in the war, but if there was an actual fight, or battle if you will, We do need people like Undaunted.

      Not to mention Tyrell, I support him with no reservations.

  30. BringBackTheCrusades says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 9:58 pm

    This story about ieutenant-colonel Tyrrell gives me hope that the tide is turning. I hope I can perform as valiantly when called upon to defend a woman from the savages .

  31. SoCalMike says

    Jan 4, 2017 at 10:52 pm

    And so many are “proud” the Aussies gave up their guns.

    Every time I hear one of them or like the recently-returned American I met the other night, he was proud of that.
    I was polite but had to take a shower after listening to this Europeanized Zombie.

  32. citycat says

    Jan 5, 2017 at 12:33 am

    @ mortimer
    Re words
    There’s a lot to be said for words really.
    I guess it makes a difference what words are used, maybe.
    Muslims like to whisper curses near your ear, thinking you can’t hear, as do the Chinese and Zoroastrians, i’ve heard, because they can’t get their own way when really they shouldn’t in some particular case.
    Muslims want their own way, irrespective of anyone’s wishes.
    They can’t be different while they follow the Qur’an.
    The power of words, gives pause for thought.
    The power of words is used against us, ie Islãmophobia for one.
    Time to destroy those verbal weapons of treachery.
    And then there’s words emmasse, used for all sorts, group chants, latin hymns, lots of religious stuff, black magic curses, i wonder what they say in the Mosques.

  33. LR says

    Jan 5, 2017 at 2:34 am

    Dang, some people sure got into it on this posting.

    A lot of people are scaredy cats these days. Have been for awhile.

    I use to tell punks blowin’ that subwoofer through the neighborhood to PLEASE turn it down…Of course, I would ask nicely. Most would reluctantly comply.

    I couldn’t believe how many people told me I would get shot. It’s always a possibility, but I really wasn’t worried about that.

    Many years back a woman friend started getting beaten up in her car by her boyfriend…She screamed for help, and NONE of the men around helped…A woman finally opened the damn door and got her out.

    Over the years, I have been amazed how many people are so wimpy, and fearful of confronting even silly little punks who aren’t brandishing a weapon, or anything.

    Maybe it is the 24/7 news? People think there is a murderer around every corner…I don’t know.

    A trained soldier is going to be a lot more brave than most other people.

    Thank goodness he was there!

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 6:26 pm

      The key is *trained*.

      People who are not trained, whether by the military, the police force, or a really good-quality martial arts teacher, are probably going to do more harm than good. It doesn’t mean that an untrained person relying on raw instinct couldn’t do anything, but… training helps. A lot. And experience.

      The three American blokes who took down a would-be jihadi aboard a Very Fast Train, in Europe, not so long ago, were *trained* soldiers. They weren’t just ordinary joes. They were 1/ close friends from way back, so they could ‘read’ each other’s unspoken signals as well as spoken, hence able to act as a team and 2/ they had military training.

      Me, speaking as the 53 year old Aussie matron that I am, with sons aged 26 and 16… I’d be more than happy if National Service for all (infidel) Aussies post-high-school, taking our cue from the Israelis, the Swiss and the Singaporeans, with a laser-like focus on Homeland Defence, were instituted. And then, like the Israelis, a ‘reserve’ system. (I would, btw, require *only* infidel Aussies to undergo this training and then become part of the Reserves).

      Because that means that every able-bodied man – and woman! – in your society has had proper, systematic, thorough, intelligent *training* in the use of weapons and the art of war..

      It is orders of magnitude different from being the kind of person who has acquired some basic fighting skills by getting into fights in the playground or outside the pub or can use a weapon because they go trap shooting or go hunting on weekends.

  34. Pumbar says

    Jan 5, 2017 at 4:08 am

    I grew up on the streets in the days when the streets were hard and not soft, flabby streets like you get now. I was raised in an age when punks were punks and zips were had in parts of your trousers where no fly or pocket should belong. A grimy, rough assed, stubbed out Marlboro butt end of a one horse town with no horses, ladies, orthodontists or antibac handwash. A place were a kid had to eat his own leg just to make it to the mine for the chance to work a two day shift in one hour to pay toward his no good daddy’s badger baiting debt.
    I’d still take my hat off (if I could afford one) to this guy though.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 7, 2017 at 8:48 pm

      🙂

  35. Steven says

    Jan 5, 2017 at 5:12 am

    Good on REAL man Kyle!!!!!….. he have huge bull balls for standing up and protects his wife Liana…….. not likely his Victoria Premier Daniel Andrews (two-faced bias).

  36. waterdog says

    Jan 5, 2017 at 8:54 am

    Australia needs to enact a version of the 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and deny that right to Muslims. Before all of you get your panties in a wad over my “racism,” the truth of the matter is the Muslim immigrants are an invading army of stoneaged savages who have no respect for anything other than Islam. You wouldn’t keep wild animals in your house so why allow feral, uncivilized apemen into your country?

    • Marty says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 9:21 am

      Well said waterdog.
      i can’t improve on or add to your comments, save by this —
      I thought, & prayed, that Australia/N Zealand would be the last stronghold of Western
      civilisation, apart from the very vulnerable Israel.
      Europe & the UK fail to defend themselves against invading savages, indeed,
      encourage it, & the US pretends it is not happening there by small increments.
      Australia & New Zealand, have always been selective about immigrants.
      trouble is, let a heterosexual mohammedan couple in, & you’ve got one kid
      dropped annually. And then there’s the matter of extended family rights plus
      polygamy.
      There are decent people from mohammedan backgrounds, but they’re secular,
      ie ex, muslims.
      The devout ones have no place in the West.
      They’ve got masses of land already.
      just look how they’ve fouled it up.

    • londo says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 11:00 am

      I can’t agree with you more. The fact of the matter however is that here in Europe, the reverse version is already a fact. Illegal firearms are mostly in muslim possession while law abiding Europeans are largely unarmed. I truly fear a Rwandan type of massacre event where one Friday evening they get coordinated at Friday prayers and kill thousands or tens of thousands of people. They surely have the capability to do it. We are totally defenseless.

      • LR says

        Jan 6, 2017 at 12:53 am

        londo,

        If criminals get weapons…I am sure there are ways of good people who want to defend themselves with guns and such to get a hold of them.

        • londo says

          Jan 7, 2017 at 5:32 am

          I am sure. However, I have a family to support. 6 kids. One breadwinner. How will they fare if I would face prison time because of illegal weapons? I live in a country with ridiculously strict gun laws.

  37. londo says

    Jan 5, 2017 at 10:54 am

    He is my hero. I only had to fight 2 and the oldest was only 18. They are a bunch of cowards. When they got beat up, they run away to get the rest of the extended family. I wish I could carry a concealed firearm. You can not expect to win too many fights, even if it is only one-on-one and If you loose, they have no qualms hurting you really bad while we do.

  38. Don Foss says

    Jan 5, 2017 at 1:06 pm

    I saw Muslims fight often during 7 years as a civilian in 3 different countries on the Arabian Peninsula. It’s like this, always: Back-peddling, taking off their sandals or shoes and throwing them at their opponent who is also back-peddling and throwing his shoes. A lot of yelling in a stern voice though. Then sending a kid into the middle to grab their shoes. The world;s biggest pussies, Arabs.

    • Don Foss says

      Jan 5, 2017 at 1:09 pm

      They do, however, like slapping around their Filippina, Indian and Sri Lankan maids in public. Real tough guys.

  39. duh swami says

    Jan 5, 2017 at 3:23 pm

    De programing…Any Muslim who shows up is not a Muslim…

  40. Champ says

    Jan 6, 2017 at 1:03 am

    Australia: Eight Muslims attack woman, her husband fights them off

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Should read: Eight mohammedan *COWARDS* attacked this woman …

    mohammedans are always cowards whom attack those vulnerable and weaker than them and in mobs too; and generally they hide in the shadows and attack without warning at the slightest provocation. And they attack without provocation, as well. Sick savages! ..islam is the ‘religion’ from hell!

  41. Daniel Triplett says

    Jan 6, 2017 at 6:21 am

    Watch this two and a half minute video of 30 Muslims getting their asses kicked by 30 Russians in a street fight. The Russians know what they’re doing, wearing knuckle gloves, and even removing their shirts, because shirts can be dangerous to wear in a fight.

    I’ve watched it dozens of times, always with a huge smile on my face.

    For your enjoyment:

    https://youtu.be/bsIykHP_D_U

  42. Lenore says

    Jan 6, 2017 at 12:21 pm

    Thank you Mr. Terrell for being a man and a hero for sticking up for your wife. You should be emulated.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Infidel on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.