Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.
This special edition of the Glazov Gang presents the Mark Tapson Moment hosted by Mark Tapson, editor of TruthRevolt.org.
Mark discussed The Left’s War on Masculinity – Part II, unveiling how cultural Marxism on U.S. campuses is crippling America’s ability to defend itself.
Don’t miss it!
And make sure to watch Part I of this discussion HERE.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account or GoFundMe campaign to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel and to Jamie Glazov Productions. Also LIKE us on Facebook and LIKE Jamie’s FB Fan Page.
only the truth says
So true … These #LeftLiberal pussies have turned Europe into one big pee hole where these islamic terrorists are coming and pissing and shitting at will .. and doing as they please… Wake up pussy europe … WAKE UP … its already too late to unpussify you … but still….
citycat says
Very true. And worse. Teenagers are like clones that have had some sort of weird mindbending.
Their individuality filed down.
Peer pressured to surrender to the weak vibe state of being, like no free dangerous thought about dangerous wishy washy lies to control and guide the upcoming generation into the mouth of the hell of Islãm.
A Harris USA says
The hell of Islam will be exposed for what it is, once Trump comes into office.. Comey, on the way out, I would wager. Gen. Flynn, and others who KNOW what Islam is, and the threat they present to our country, are about to be in the front and center of this on going war.. Things will change, and the younger crowd will see what a real man, and men can and will do for the benefit of our nation.. Remember, this younger crowd have never seen a Regan, a Kennedy, or an Eisenhower and only know the weak idiots of Obama, and his minions.. Time to see what a real generation of men can and will do.. Obama is no example for any one, much less the younger set.
Westman says
Perhaps instead of passing out free condoms on campuses they should be passing out free “Low-T” supplements. A truckload to the nation’s capital couldn’t hurt.
I hear a refrain: “What is a man, what has he got? If not himself, then he has not…”
The commonality of Islam’s men and the weak men of the West is that neither is the captain of his own ship. The aggression of Allah’s unthinking men directed against passive unthinking men can only have one outcome – and it is an extremely horrific outcome for women.
FP says
You are correct, Westman.
(1) western men need to grow a spine and stand up against the Islamic invaders. If they do not, our women will be wearing burkas and our daughters will be subjected to genital mutilation within a few generations.
(2) although male violence should not be the default answer to all crises, violence is sometimes necessary. Some say violence does not solve problems. On the contrary, it does solve them sometimes, and quite decisively!
(2) western people may need to stop fixating on having sex for the mere purpose of pleasure (i.e. masturbation, casual sex using condoms) and begin having sex with their wives for the purpose of building families and supporting our civilization (our demographics are low, but that of Muslims is rising). As it stands, western nations are funding Muslims with our tax dollars so that they can have more children and, as a result of those taxes, we cannot afford to have more children if we so desired (we need to cut off their cash).
Tommy says
Clint Eastwood called this generation, “The pussy generation”
Eric Jones says
I do not believe that women want to be around vulnerable men. Nor do women want to be around men who put skirts on as a protest against the rapes in Germany.
Eric
davej says
The Islamic invasion is a perfect opportunity for real men to express their masculinity by defending women and children from the perverted depredations of Muslim men. These guys are big talking cowards who rely on surprise attack and rallying a gang of like-minded savages to support them. They could be easily defeated by men with castration knives, some guns and a grim determination to rid the world of assholes.
The feminist leftists are in for a shock when their favorite barbarians get a little closer.
scherado says
Can anyone imagine what is required of the brain to support a male-dominated, femanine-suppressive “lifestyle” AND embrace, AS A FOUNDATIONAL TENET, a male-suppressive “doctrine”?
I KNOW I hurt myself contructing that sentence–there is no other outcome when charged with the task of conveying a Leftists “brain-salad”, a.k.a. “belief”, “principles”–
Tom S. says
I think he is missing the bigger picture of the damage being done. This badly damages the already terrible demographics of the West. The wusses being created by our culture aren’t going to be up for having a big family. At a micro and personal scale, I can’t imagine my heroic daughter marrying any of the little boys she goes to school with someday.
Daniel Sebold says
I grew up during the Vietnam War and witnessed the feminists in 1969 hands-down reject the gay rights movement. I have seen feminists like Gloria Steinem give their political support to Al Gore who has a history going back to the nineteen eighties of his friendship with Tennessee’s Reverend Phelp’s “God hates fags” movement. I have never seen any evidence that feminists want to effeminize men. Effeminate boys, momma’s boys, or whatever you want to call them come from a traditional marriage where boys are exposed to the influence of an-at home mother who is loving and affectionate. Boys who have distorted views of machismo and who are violent come from single parent families with often feminist mothers who suffer from misandry and who often take out violent revenge on the male sex through their defenseless sons, making sexist comments about their sexuality and slapping them around for sexual issues like masturbation.
There was far more gender bending among normal heterosexual boys going on in the sixties and seventies when mothers were still at home than what is going on in this distorted macho hip hop culture, and that is because we young males then didn’t want to be associated at that time with the Vietnam War, so long hair, earrings, short shorts, especially short gym shorts and basketball shorts, flower print Speedo bikinis were available to the male gender and at the time were not considered unmasculine or “gay” as they are now. You would be hard pressed to find a feminist in today’s university who would be willing to be seen on a beach with a young man in a flower print bikini or any kind of bikini or in a shopping mall with a boy in short shorts. It doesnt happen today. Open your eyes and look around. Go to the beach and start counting all the women in bikinis and g strings on the beach and then count the zero number of men out there wearing the same. It is that way because the feminists want it that way. They never say anything against this type of sexism.
It is a terrible mistake to allow feminists to define our masculinity, because their perceptions of what a man or a boy can be is wrought with unconscious homophobia. There are stories on the net written by feminists mothers who tell their fourteen year old sons that they cant wear short shorts in public or bikini Speedos to the beach. That is outrageously sexist and hypocritical of the feminists who said in the past that they wanted to get rid of sexism and create a society of sexual equality. Feminists today don’t know what equality is. They want equality for women on women’s issues, but they want to put men in a straight jacket, have us walking on the beach in burka shorts while they wear whatever they choose.
Only we as males have the right to define our masculinity the way we want. In Japan, where men still have a say in the family, school boys run around in Hanzubon hot pants in some schools and bikini Speedos at the beach and are not considered effeminate or homosexual. On the contrary, in Japan, in Tokyo, old men sit in cafes in mini shorts and sometimes thongs and are considered Shinto macho. Japanese women celebrate masculinity by hanging wreaths on huge marble phaluses in Shinto Temples.
We males need to take back our proper roles as men and allow our boys to define their masculinity, not “liberal pro gay” Target Stores which claim to be gay tolerant but dont sell Speedos or short shorts for men and boys because they are too homophobic. Back in 1970 during pre homophobic times, that is, back when most of us from that time period in our youth were unaware that there was such an issue, Sears and Macy’s sold all these things to men and boys and we were not considered “faggots” for wearing such attire, especially on basketball courts and on swimming teams. If you don’t believe what I am saying, go to the net and type in 1970 male fashion from Mc Calls Magazine and you will be shocked at how “gay” males looked back then, but keep in mind, that wasn’t gay and isnt gay. Gay males today wouldn’t dare wear that stuff in public. They are too homophobic