• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Scotland: Anglican Cathedral Epiphany service features Qur’an reading denying Jesus is Son of God

Jan 11, 2017 11:27 am By Robert Spencer

Lord, what fools these Anglicans be. When is the mosque service featuring a New Testament reading affirming that Jesus is the Son of God?

The Qur’an reading at the cathedral was apparently part or all of this: “And mention in the Book Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a place toward the east. And she took, in seclusion from them, a screen. Then We sent to her Our Angel, and he represented himself to her as a well-proportioned man. She said, ‘Indeed, I seek refuge in the Most Merciful from you, if you should be fearing of Allah.’ He said, ‘I am only the messenger of your Lord to give you a pure boy.’ She said, ‘How can I have a boy while no man has touched me and I have not been unchaste?’ He said, ‘Thus: your Lord says, “It is easy for Me, and We will make him a sign to the people and a mercy from Us. And it is a matter decreed.”‘ So she conceived him, and she withdrew with him to a remote place. And the pains of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree. She said, ‘Oh, I wish I had died before this and was in oblivion, forgotten.’ But he called her from below her, ‘Do not grieve; your Lord has provided beneath you a stream. And shake toward you the trunk of the palm tree; it will drop upon you ripe, fresh dates. So eat and drink and be contented. And if you see from among humanity anyone, say, “Indeed, I have sworn to the Most Merciful a fast, so I will not speak today to man.”‘ Then she brought him to her people, carrying him. They said, ‘O Mary, you have certainly done a thing unprecedented. O sister of Aaron, your father was not a man of evil, nor was your mother unchaste.’ So she pointed to him. They said, ‘How can we speak to one who is in the cradle a child?’ He said, ‘Indeed, I am the servant of Allah. He has given me the Scripture and made me a prophet. And He has made me blessed wherever I am and has enjoined upon me prayer and zakah as long as I remain alive and dutiful to my mother, and He has not made me a wretched tyrant. And peace is on me the day I was born and the day I will die and the day I am raised alive.’ That is Jesus, the son of Mary – the word of truth about which they are in dispute. It is not for Allah to take a son; exalted is He! When He decrees an affair, He only says to it, ‘Be,’ and it is.” (Qur’an 19:16-35)

That last bit, “It is not for Allah to take a son,” is in direct contradiction to what the Anglican Church is supposed to believe: “And the angel said to her, ‘The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God.” (Luke 1:35)

The idea that Jesus is the Son of God is a central, foundational tenet of Christianity, held by all Christian sects, Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant. What kind of madness has overtaken the Anglicans in Glasgow, that they would allow what is ostensibly a central belief of their faith to be denied in the place that is supposed to be the site of the purest and most vibrant expression of that faith? Clearly their religion is not Christianity in any form, but Leftist multiculturalism. What they will ultimately find, to their shock and horror, is that their Muslim partners in this multicultural endeavor have no intention of reciprocating their generosity and hospitality, but will ultimately only subjugate them under the hegemony of Islamic law. They’re already halfway there.

“Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali Condemns Koran Reading At Anglican Cathedral Epiphany Service,” by Harry Farley, Christian Post, January 9, 2017:

Christians are familiar with the Bible texts that detail the conception and birth of Jesus to His mother, the Virgin Mary.

But they are not so used to hearing the Muslim version of the story read out in church. And especially not on Epiphany, which celebrates the incarnation of God as His son Jesus – a doctrine denied by Muslims.

Michael Nazir-Ali, a leading evangelical Christian in Britain, has now condemned the reading on a service at the Scottish Episcopal Church’s Glasgow Cathedral last Friday.

The congregation at St Mary’s cathedral heard the Muslim version of the Virgin Mary’s conception of Jesus, from the Koran’s Sura 19, sung by Madinah Javed. The passage explains how Mary gave birth after an angel told her God would give her a child.
Advertisement

Muslims believe Jesus was a prophet, and that He was a precursor to Mohammed rather than the Son of God.

Sura 19 states that Mary was “ashamed” after she gave birth, and that the infant Jesus miraculously spoke to her from his crib and claimed he was “a servant of God”.

It denies Jesus was the Son of God.

A post on the cathedral’s Facebook page describes the service as a “wonderful event”.

It ays [sic]: “The congregation was also reminded during the service that it is not only Christians who give honour to Jesus. We were joined by friends from two local Muslim communities.” The post also shares a video of the recitation.

But Nazir-Ali, former Bishop of Rochester condemned the reading and called for discipline against those involved.

“The authorities of the Scottish Episcopal Church should immediately repudiate this ill-advised invitation,” he said in a statement.

He also called for the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, to publicly distance the Church of England and the wider Anglican Communion from the event.

” Christians should know what their fellow citizens believe and this can include reading the Qur’an for themselves, whether in the original or in translation. This is not, however, the same thing as having it read in Church in the context of public worship,” he said.

“It is particularly insensitive to have this passage read in Church on the Feast of the Epiphany when we celebrate not only Christ’s manifestation to the gentiles but also his baptism and the divine declaration, ‘you are my beloved son in whom I am well pleased’.”…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: dhimmitude, Featured, Qur'an, Scotland, United Kingdom, Useful idiots Tagged With: Anglican Church, Epiphany, Glasgow, Madinah Javed, Michael Nazir-Ali, St. Mary's Cathedral


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Ecosse1314 says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 11:34 am

    To be fair the Anglican community in Scotland is very very small…..and have always been libtards.

    • Mark says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 11:46 am

      A little yeast effects the entire loaf.

      • Mark says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 11:48 am

        *affects *

    • JOHN SPIELMAN says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 12:53 pm

      except they have allowed Stan /allah into their midst by reading the quran, this doctrine of Satan, in the church

      • Peggy says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 8:06 pm

        Maybe they put too much faith in their minister and if he says it’s ok then it must be.
        They could be just simple folk who don’t know how bad this really is.
        Some sheep are smarter than others and won’t just blindly trust they shepherd.

        • Annak says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 3:36 am

          Simple souls not grounded in the faith they profess to believe in is no faith. The prophecied ‘great delusion’ and/or ‘falling away’?
          Sad, but also dangerous. This is / will be the easiest Islam take-over in Jihad history. Terrifying.

    • Bonnie Prince Charlie says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 2:27 pm

      But the Church of Scotland are also libtards and will no doubt embrace this. They certainly won’t speak out against it as that would leave them open to charges of Islamophobia.

    • Grace says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 10:18 am

      I would think it will get even smaller, if they insist on welcoming Chris-lam into their services.

  2. Thelastvirgingoat says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 11:51 am

    There are plenty of mosques in Britain why do they have to use a cathedral.

    • Ecosse1314 says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 2:08 pm

      If anyone is disgusted at this story you can email these left-wing libtards on scotland.anglican.org or even better phone them on 0131 225 6357

      • Vic says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 3:08 pm

        Good idea! Perhaps the whole article by RS should be forwarded along with all the comments. Will they be surprised?

    • Peggy says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 8:11 pm

      Because they want to take it all from us.

    • American-Pragmatism says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 10:08 pm

      Jihad demands fighting against all unbelievers until they are subservient to the koran and pay jizya.

      Basically they didn’t attack us in 9/11 because we support israel or put a mcdonalds in syria. It is because they are commanded to fight until sharia dominates the world.

    • Frank Courtney says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 4:27 am

      Because reading that passage in a Christian church was an expression of Islamic supremacism.

    • Gana says

      Jan 29, 2017 at 11:35 am

      To spread their Beliefs! They will weedle their way into our lives however they can and it is ultimately to spread their word. We must not be taken in, deceived, too trusting, too accommodating, too eager to let them integrate into our western society. East is East and West is West. It was blasphemy and the Scottish church was foolish to believe anything could be achieved by it. Wake up you people wake up.We have accommodated people in the UK from all over the world. What is done is done. What we shouldn’t do is allow their evils into our society churches politics law etc. Wake up you people wake up. Shame on the church that allowed it. Christians have been massacred in the middle east brits beheaded they want the West to convert. Have the Scottish been asleep all this time?? God so loved the world that he gave his only son, Jesus Christ.

      • Phil Copson says

        Jan 29, 2017 at 6:37 pm

        Fine – but have you actually contacted the church concerned ? Telling us doesn’t achieve anything….

  3. Thelastvirgingoat says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 11:52 am

    There are plenty of mosques in Bbritain why do they have to use a cathedral?

    • Wellington says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 7:25 pm

      “There are plenty of mosques in Bbritain {sic} why do they have to use a cathedral?”

      Because, ultimately, Mohammedans believe everything belongs to them. Think Hagia Sophia.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 8:06 pm

        Exactly, Wellington.

      • DFD says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 1:35 am

        I agree with you. Referring to your question/comment: “…why do they have to use a cathedral?”

        Simple answer: Undermining, whenever and wherever possible. The magnitude of that is irrelevant, though, the greater the better. But irrespective, undermining, by statement, pretense, complaint, demand, at every possible opportunity.

        Undermining and propagating at every possible occasion. Appropriate or not, means nothing to a Muslim.

        • DFD says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 1:38 am

          PS: Just noted, question wasn’t yours. Sorry about that.

  4. Phil Copson says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 11:54 am

    No – fairness consists of telling the truth in full without fear or favour, and the people who organised this church service have betrayed their religion and the congregation.

    Church-going too often seems to be the hobby of social inadequates who don’t actually have any firm beliefs.

    I’m not religious, but I greatly dislike people who claim to be when it is obvious at a glance that they are simply self-important.

    Going off at a tangent here – Prince Charles’ wish to have himself described as the “Defender of Faith” is simply ludicrous – how can you believe in and defend things that are diametrically opposed to each other ? eg – “I believe in “A”‘s right to religious freedom and I simultaneously believe in “B”‘s right to destroy “A”‘s place of worship and kill “A” if possible.” The man is simply a fool.

    • Ecosse1314 says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 11:57 am

      Should have been a bit more specific. The episcopalian church in Scotland have always been extreme left-wing twats so no surprise this has occurred.

    • c m says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 12:01 pm

      I suppose “Defender of Faith (anything you wish to believe at the moment)” would fit better than “Defender of The Faith”.

    • james.m says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 12:21 pm

      Does the Vatican *really* want to ecumenise with Anglicans who combine sacrilege, heresy, blasphemy and apostasy, at a supposedly Anglican service, in a cathedral, on one of the most important feasts of Christ ?

      • Peggy says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 8:12 pm

        You think the Pope’s any better?
        There are stories about his treachery.

    • Kay says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 9:46 am

      “the people who organised this church service have betrayed their religion and the
      congregation.”

      I agree.
      They went in trust to hear God’s word spoken and to hear the story of Jesus, Savior of the world.
      Until there is condemnation of those involved, as advised by Bishop Nazir-Ali, the congregation won’t be able to trust what they might hear.

      Something similar happened in the US recently. Was it the Presbyterian convention where they invited an imam to speak?

  5. james.mich says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 12:07 pm

    More details here: http://anglicanmainstream.org/glasgow-quran-recitation-in-st-marys-cathedral/

    Video: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5tNnJAH45ZjMFN0dmhnSi0xbFE/view

  6. Mark A says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 12:07 pm

    The Anglicans in Scotland are losing their way.

    Here’s a link to a followup on this story….

    http://www.christiantoday.com/article/controversy.over.cathedral.koran.reading.deepens.with.denial.that.jesus.is.son.of.god/103780.htm

    • Christianblood says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 6:23 pm

      Liberal elites that are running the Western world and the majority of their postmodernist societies in the West truly respect and love islam and muslims deeply, including muslim jihadists but hate, despise and denigrate Christianity and Christians and other victims of the global islamic jihad.

      http://www.christianpost.com/news/signs-america-declared-war-christianity-163165/

      • Angemon says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 8:33 am

        Christianblood posted:

        “Liberal elites that are running the Western world and the majority of their postmodernist societies in the West truly respect and love islam and muslims deeply, including muslim jihadists”

        Citation needed.

        “but hate, despise and denigrate Christianity and Christians and other victims of the global islamic jihad.”

        It’s not the West who recorded a jihadi as a “hero” and named a bridge after him:

        https://meduza.io/en/lion/2016/06/18/police-say-protesters-may-have-committed-hate-speech-by-quoting-the-former-chechen-leader-who-just-got-his-own-bridge

        Nor is it in the West where you can be arrested for preaching the Gospel:

        http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-leaders-arrested-russia-law-banning-evangelism-outside-churches-goes-into-effect-168852/

    • R Russell says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:08 pm

      This is a Scottish Episcopal church, not an Anglican one. A moot point, but important

  7. andra says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 12:18 pm

    The leaders of Christianity are incredible chicken. It does not matter which country you pick. This event in GB, in France the cardinals did not hesitate to bow to Muslims after one of those killed a priest. In Germany the leaders of both churches took off their Christian symbols when visiting the Temple Mount in Jerusalem and the American catholic bishops in General take the same line, let alone the Pope.

    I really wished we had another Pope Urban or some political leader as Catherine the Great.

    • Christianblood says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 6:34 pm

      andra posted

      (..This event in GB, in France the cardinals did not hesitate to bow to Muslims after one of those killed a priest. In Germany the leaders of both churches took off their Christian symbols when visiting the Temple Mount in Jerusalem and the American catholic bishops in General take the same line, let alone the Pope..)

      You are absolutely right, Andra!
      There is a new modern, fashionable religion in the Western world and it is called “liberal democracy”. What is amazing is that there is nothing liberal or democratic in islam and muslims and yet the overwhelming majority of Western societies are deeply in love with islam and the quran, including muslim jihadists that are killing them and raping them. Something is very deeply rotten in Western societies and it needs to be identified and rooted out before it is too late!

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 7:27 pm

        Christianblood has no problem with the Orthodox Church appeasing Muslims–he only castigates the West.

        The fact is that few in the West have ever read the Qur’an–the assertion that everyone here has read it and are “deeply in love” with it is utterly false.

        The claim that Westerners love Muslims raping and murdering us is especially perverse.

        • Christianblood says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 7:55 am

          gravenimage

          Please tell me which Orthodox church that reads from the quran and denies the divinity of Christ. Where? When? Why are you denying the obvious, Graven? This kind of thing goes on all around the Western world all the time?

        • Angemon says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 9:04 am

          Christianblood posted:

          “This kind of thing goes on all around the Western world all the time?”

          Does it? BTW, are you living in a Western nation?

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 2:21 pm

          Christianblood, Patriarch Kirill chided the West for not taking in *more* Muslims–surely this is dangerous to Russia? Putin has claimed that Islam is the faith of Russia equally with Christianity.

          Unlike you, I care about the Jihad threat to *all of us*–and how dhimmitude almost everywhere unwittingly enables that threat.

        • Christianblood says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 6:36 pm

          gravenimage

          Dear Graven, I can assure you that NO Orthodox Church anywhere in the world would ever recite the Quran in its sanctuary and NO Orthodox Church anywhere in the world would deny the divinity of Jesus…Graven, Please watch patriarch Kirill in his own words:

          https://www.rt.com/shows/rt-interview/370482-patriarch-kirill-trump-us/

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 7:26 pm

          Christianblood, I notice that you completely sidestepped by question about Patriarch Kirill calling for the increased invasion of Russia and the West by ravening Muslims:

          “West should learn from Russia to accept Muslim refugees – Patriarch Kirill”

          http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=12354

          In it, he sneers at the West being nervous about increased Jihad terror.

          Then I watched the RT interview with Patriarch Kirill–your link does not work here in the US, so I Googled it.

          Patriarch Kirill briefly mentions being Christians being threatened in the Middle East–he *never once*, in an 18 minute interview, says that it is Islam that is threatening them. Instead, he assiduously avoids saying who is presenting the threat.

          He has no condemnation for the savagery of Islam–in fact, he talks about how supposedly “reasonable” Muslims are–that they are in no way offended by Christians celebrating Christmas. Someone should tell their victims at all the bombed out churches that, and their victims at the Christmas Market in Germany, and all the victims of all the other Jihad attacks on Christians at Christmas.

          In fact, the only thing that Patriarch Kirill *does* castigate are civilized Western laws and values. He singles out the Western use of the term Xmas–which is not a negation of Christmas, incidentally, but a use of the Greek X for “Christ”. He is exercised by this–but not for Islam mass slaughtering people, including Christians.

          He does finally mention ‘extremism’–unfortunately, what he has in mind is secular societies which practice separation of church and state, not savage Jihad.

          He also says, referring to the legalization of gay marriage, that “for the first time in human history, legislation is at odds with the moral nature of human beings”.

          This is *just shocking*. Apparently he didn’t think the Gulag or the other injustices of the Soviet Union were at odds with the moral nature of human beings–nor that the horror of Shari’ah Law is at such odds.

          I don’t care what one’s views are on the morality of same-sex marriage–for his not to recognize the evil of stoning rape victims to death and the other horrors of Shari’ah while claiming that Western laws are “immoral” is truly appalling.

          Patriarch Kirill may not allow Muslims to read the Qur’an in his church–but he appeases Islam every bit as much as these idiots in Scotland.

          This presents a danger to Russian and other Christians–in fact, to all non-Muslims. I doubt that you care, though, because opposing the horror of Islam has never been your focus here–just slamming the West.

      • Angemon says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 8:29 am

        Christianblood posted:

        “There is a new modern, fashionable religion in the Western world and it is called “liberal democracy”.”

        Stop using words you don’t know, like “religion”, “liberal” or “democracy”.

        “the overwhelming majority of Western societies are deeply in love with islam and the quran, including muslim jihadists that are killing them and raping them.”

        Citation needed.

        “Something is very deeply rotten in Western societies and it needs to be identified and rooted out before it is too late!”

        That would be the leftovers of decades of your country’s attempts to undermine and implode them – the Soviet infiltration and co-opting of “civil rights movements” as a means to foment dissent and attempt to destabilise Western civil/political societies. Please watch the very educational video below where Yuri Bezmenov, a very brave man, who defected from the KGB, explains how this was done. But before that, I’d like to know why are you regressing to your pre-Trump rhetoric and if you are still living in a Western nation. I’ve asked you the latter a few times but you never answered. Why is that?

    • Kepha says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 7:31 pm

      Speaking as a Protestant Christian, I reluctantly agree with you, Andra. In the 17th century, the people would’ve rioted against the blasphemous reading of the infamous Qur’an in a church.

      It seems that every state–established church in Europe has gone rotten.

      • andra says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 7:27 am

        But we are no longer in the 17th century. Today´s churches are eroded by leaders who submiss the whole church to Islam. And I can´t see any differences between Catholics and Protestants

  8. RM says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 12:34 pm

    Does reading the Koran aloud in a church or cathedral cause that building to be considered a mosque under Islamic law?

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 2:11 pm

      Any building Muslims worship in is henceforth considered a Mosque. Muslims probably realize they are not in a position to follow through on this–but I’m sure they’re keeping it in mind for the future…

      • RM says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 6:40 pm

        Thank you.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 8:16 pm

      If the Christian symbols were removed and an Imam was conducting a service then yes, a church becomes a mosque after a cleansing ceremony by the Imam.
      I don’t think this has happened here but, baby steps. It’s obviously on their agenda.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 2:27 pm

        Agreed, Peggy.

  9. FP says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 12:47 pm

    When will the readings from the New Testament that claim Jesus is the Son of God be read in any Mosque anywhere at any time? Double standard? The reading of Christian Scripture in a mosque will only be allowed when Christian conversions of people other than one’s own family members and the building of Christian churches without special permits are allowed in Muslim countries (i.e. never).

    • Donovan Nuera says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 2:26 pm

      Exactomundo!!!

  10. Angemon says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 12:50 pm

    There’s two questions I need to ask:

    1 – Was the reading done in English or Arabic?
    2 – Did the organizers knew what was going to be read or what it meant?

    • Ecosse1314 says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 1:28 pm

      Apparently the reading was in arabic and the reader , a muslimah, apparently read more than was agreed. See the link on Mark A post above.

      • Angemon says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 9:05 am

        Thank you for the info, Ecosse1314.

  11. Walter Sieruk says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 1:07 pm

    Shame on the “Christian”leaders of that specific Anglican Cathedral in Scotland as professed Christians the should well understand the the Bible clearly teachers that Jesus of the Son of God. As seen ,for example in Matthew 3:16,17 . 1615,16, . 17;5 Luke 1:35. John 3:16-18, 36 Colossians 1:13. First John 2:23,34. 4:14,15. 5:12,13. So there no excuse for the so called “Christians” in that cathedral to allow the reading of the false teaching of the Quran in that place of worship which is said the be Christian.

    Furthermore , the Bible doctrine that Jesus of the only begotten Son of God of Father is the very foundation of Christianity . In addition the that Jesus is the one only only unique Son of God is part of the Christian doctrine of the Holy Trinity. This Bible doctrine of the Trinity the Quran and all of Islam is in denial of. Therefore the following message is very important

    The scholar as well as author, Nabeel Qureshi of the book entitled ANSWERING JIHAD who in the past was a Muslim but now a Christian had explained clearly that god of Islam is not the God of the Bible. For on page 113 in his book he informs the reader that “Islam roundly condemns worship of the Trinity [5:73], establishing in contrast its own core principle of Tawhid, the absolute oneness of God. Tawhid emphatically denies the Trinity; so much that it is safe to say the doctrine of God in Islam is antithetical to the doctrine of God in Christianity. Not just different but opposed.” Further on page 116 he elaborates that “Tawhid is antithetical to the Trinity, fundamentally incompatible and only similar superficially and semantically, Muslims and Christians do not worship the same God.” Therefore it’s fitting then to make a reiteration of the following essay on this very important subject.

    There are a number of apologists for Islam, some are imams and mullahs and strangely enough, even some so called “Christian” pastors, who have made the outstanding claim that Christians and Muslim both believe in and worship the same God. So it stands to reason that it’s important to know if this claims valid and true or invalid and false. The facts are that the god of Islam or the Muslims is a single being. In great contrast the God of Christianity, of the Christians consists as the Trinity. By the Trinity it means that “Within the essence of the one True God there are Three Persons. Being God the Father. God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. Not three gods in one But Three Distinct Persons in One God. Being the Tri-Personal Nature of God, Matthew 3:13-17. Second Corinthians 13:14. . The Bible teaches, the Father is God, Galatians 1:1.The Son is God, First John 5:20. The Holy Spirit is God, Acts 5:3,4. Not three gods but the one and only Triune God.
    As further explained in the Christian book MAJOR BIBLE THEMES by Lewis Sperry Chafer on page 39 which informs the readers that “Many believe that the doctrine of the Trinity in implicit in the use of the word Elohim, as the name of God which is in a plural form and seems to refer to the Triune God. “ Likewise, in the Christian magazine PERHAPS TODAY November/December 2013 on page 8 it reads about Genesis 1:1. “In the beginning God [this is the plural noun Elohim, meaning ‘more than one’] created the heaven and the earth.” Furthermore, a bit of a view of the inner workings of the Trinity together may be seen in that the God the Father raised Jesus from the dead. Romans 10:9,10. Jesus raised Himself from the dead, John 2:19,20. The Holy Spirit raised Jesus from the dead, Romans 8:11.The inner-workings of the Trinity of God may also be seen in the fact that the Father sanctifies, First Thessalonians 5:23. The Son sanctifies, Ephesians 5:26. Hebrews 2:11; 9:12,14;13:12.The Holy Spirit sanctifies ,Romans 15:16. Second Thessalonians 2:13. Getting back to the Bible book of Genesis. In Genesis 1:26 in reads “The God said let US make man in Our image , according to our likeness…” The words are the plural “Us” and “Our.” As in “We the Trinity” For the very next verse, 27, it further reads “So God created man in His own image…” In verse 26 it’s the plural “Us” and “Our” to the singular “His” That is Three Persons in One God. In addition, in the New Testament in Matthew 28:19 It further reads the Jesus said “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the the Son and the Holy Spirit.” [N.K.J.V] That is “name” not “names.” In conclusion the many apologists and propagandists for Islam for Islam who make the claim that Christians and Muslims believe in and worship the same God are make an untrue and outright false claim. For the God of Christianity, Christians and the Bible is not the god of Islam Muslims and the Koran.
    There is the Christian site http://www.answering-islam.org

    • R Russell says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:11 pm

      It’s NOT an Anglican cathedral, it’s a Scottish Episcopal one

      • Terry Smith says

        Jan 15, 2017 at 7:43 am

        I live in Edinburgh everybody knows the Scottish Episcopalian Church is part of the Anglican Communion it says so on the signs outside their churches.

  12. marblenecltr says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 1:09 pm

    Prince Charles no longer considers himself Defender of the Faith, but, Deender of All Faiths.

    • Donovan Nuera says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 2:30 pm

      He would convert in a heartbeat, if he is ever anointed as King before he dies of old age, to islam just to appease any future rioters under Lord Mayor Khan in Tower Hamlets. I still harbor the feeling that a lot dhimmis and women converts (such as Tony Blair’s loser sister-in-law) are enthralled by the physical clothing, such as the niqab, as people are enthused about “dressing up” in “exotic” costumes that lend an air of S&M or ninja fantasy about them.Amirite???

      • Kepha says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 7:33 pm

        Or Chuckie Windsor is nostalgic for the days of Empire, and fancies himself a latter-day Lawrence of Arabia?

  13. Walter Sieruk says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 1:11 pm

    What ignorant men the head of the cathedral are for allowing that anti-Christian book, the Quran in be read and taught in a place that is supposed to be Christian.

    The way for a person to discover the truth concerning the nature of Jesus is found in the Bible verse Isaiah 8:20. This instructs “To the law of the testimony. If they do not speak according to the word, it is because there is no light in them.” [N.K.J.V.] In other words, if a religious teacher has teaching that are in contradiction to the Word, the Bible, then that teachers is a false teacher who teaches false doctrines. The Muslim clerics, as the imam and mullahs, teach and speak doctrines about God from the Quran .
    As the Quran in 112 teaches “He is God alone: God is the eternal begetteth not…” Likewise, this religious book which is the entire foundation of and for Islam further teaches in 19:35. “It is not befitting to God that He should beget a son.” In great contrast the Bible teaches in John 1:14. “The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory , the glory of the only begotten of the Father ,full of grace and truth.” Likewise John 3:16 teaches “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son… Then just a little further in verse 18 it is written about Jesus Who is “the only begotten Son of God. “ Other places in the Bible further teach that Jesus is the Son of God as in Matthew 16:15:16. Luke 1:35. John 3:36. First John 4:14. 15. 5:14,15. Moreover to be even more clear the Bible teaches that Jesus is the Son of God, Who is God the Father. As found in Matthew 3:16,17. First John 2:22,23. 4:14,15. Of course , it ,very much, needs to made even more specific . The Bible teaches that Jesus is also God the Son. As seen in Hebrew1:8 and First John 5:20. The imams and mullahs as well as the other apologists for Islam will try to “explain” this all away. As in they will try brush off all those Bible verse off by making the claim that the Bible had been corrupted, through time, by Christians and that’s why the Bible reads as it does. That claim they make actually underestimate the Power of God to protect and keep His Word safe and intact ,through time, and away from the corruption of men.
    In conclusion ,with the above instruction of the way to find doctrinal truth in Isaiah 8:20 and in the light of the Bible verse provided it may be clearly seen, by all those who are willing to see, that Islam is in terrible doctrinal error and it is therefore a false religion, Proverbs 14:12. John 14;6.

  14. Kay says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 1:36 pm

    Shameful.

    Thank God for Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali. I hope that the authorities listen and repudiate this shameful inclusion in Christian worship.

    • Donovan Nuera says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 2:32 pm

      I concur wholeheartedly. Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali is a good man.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 8:13 pm

      Yes–he is a real hero.

  15. gravenimage says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 1:52 pm

    Scotland: Anglican Cathedral Epiphany service features Qur’an reading denying Jesus is Son of God
    ………………………………….

    Well, that pretty much sums up the foolishness of this “interfaith dialogue”.

    The worst thing, of course, is that Muslims regularly *murder* Christians for believing Jesus is the Son of God. Do these dhimmi tools realize *that*?

    • R Russell says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:14 pm

      I have had to correct this several times. It is NOT an Anglican cathedral. There are only 2 Anglican churches in Scotland and this is not one of them

      • Chris Malan says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 11:48 pm

        You will find many of these articles and posts poorly researched and sensationalistic. Facts don’t matter here, only feelings.

  16. Anthony says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 2:23 pm

    A simple remark regarding Jesus being conceived by the Holy Spirit in Mary’s womb: God created all things, He created man, (male and female) with their reproductive capacity to have offspring according to their species. If the Creator put in place the natural mechanism for procreation, having the power to do such a thing, What is to prevent Him from simply acting upon Mary’s “seed” with His “creative” power, without the aid of a male, to bring about the conception of His Beloved, as Phillippians chap.3 states? This is commonly known as the “incarnation,” On what grounds can we “put God in a box” telling Him what He can o cannot do, if everything He does has a benevolent end or purpose, to promote and secure, as far as possible, the well-being of man?

    • Champ says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 3:47 pm

      Bravo, Anthony!!! Some get really hung-up on the idea that God did this miracle through the Holy Spirit, when in fact the whole of creation is miraculous!

      More here …

      Question: “Why is the Virgin Birth so important?”

      Answer: https://www.gotquestions.org/virgin-birth.html

      Excerpt:

      From these passages, it is certainly clear that Jesus’ birth was the result of the Holy Spirit working within Mary’s body. The immaterial (the Spirit) and the material (Mary’s womb) were both involved. Mary, of course, could not impregnate herself, and in that sense she was simply a “vessel.” Only God could perform the miracle of the Incarnation.

      • billybob says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 4:52 pm

        Far more likely that Mary had had an affair with somebody, or was raped, and the story of a “miraculous virgin birth” was a cover up.

        Actually, I don’t even believe that. I believe the story was made up by those who put the chapters of the New Testament together. This whole concept that the mother of Jesus must be portrayed as “pure”. What nonsense! As if there is something wrong with sex – especially between Marry and her husband.

        Making up such a story begs the question – why was she a virgin? What was the matter with her husband, or what was the matter with their marriage that it had not been consummated? And furthermore, is a marriage that has not been consummated still a marriage? In some cultures it isn’t. At a minimum, lack of consummation is grounds for simple annulment I think even in North America.

        I believe it was the Catholics who invented the story of the Virgin Mary to go along with their philosophy of the “Original Sin”. This idea is to generate guilt and make people easier to control.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 11, 2017 at 8:20 pm

          Your silly musings on Christianity are really off-topic here.

          The point of this story is Muslim supremacy, and this is a threat to everyone in the West whether one is Christian or not.

        • billybob says

          Jan 11, 2017 at 10:33 pm

          I often attack the Catholic Church, as it is a far greater problem than this little church in Scotland in terms how they promote Islam. I just read a very long piece on Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_birth_of_Jesus
          What I learned from that is that while my musings may be silly to you, there is a long tradition of such musings, and also, that the concept of the virgin birth of Jesus only crept into Christianity long after Christ was born. Muslims also believe in the virgin birth of Christ, so an attack on that concept is at the same time at least an attack on an Islamic belief.

          Furthermore, I am an iconoclast and like to attack religion in general in spite of the fact that I feel a strong sense of spirituality and also admire the teachings of Christ. I don’t equate religion with spirituality and would hope to loosen the hold religion has on people (and especially the hold it has on Muslims) and set them free, because I see the harm it brings into this word.

          Finally, just recently there was an article on Pamela Geller’s site called For the first time, US appears on list of countries that persecute Christians. It promoted as fact the notion that “Christians in the US are facing constant attacks in the media, where they are portrayed as bigoted, racist, sexist, and close minded” and “In essence, the courts are deciding that you only have full religious freedom and expression in the church and your home. In the public domain, your religious views and thoughts must be restrained and controlled”.

          I found that article quite upsetting, being in agreement with those two premises above instead of being rallied against them as the article would have hoped, and knowing how the Republican party likes to promote the evangelical perspective. I firmly believe in the separation of Church and State. My greatest concern, however, is that allowing religion more power to shape the laws of the country is opening the door to allowing Islam to also have more power to shape the laws of the country when the Democrats return to power. That whole idea has been festering within me ever since and making me more cynical.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 2:33 pm

          billybob, you can question Christianity or any other faith to your heart’s content. I just question how salient that is here–this is not Christian Theology Watch.

          As I noted, this Muslim supremacism–though aimed at a church in this particular case–is a threat to *everyone* in the West, including Agnostics and Atheists.

          Also note that many Muslims consider you a de facto Christian simply for living in the West. You are a target, just as believing Christians are.

        • Champ says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 2:44 pm

          Also note that many Muslims consider you a de facto Christian simply for living in the West. You are a target, just as believing Christians are.

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Brava, Graven! …*precisely* the point!

        • R Russell says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 3:17 pm

          The virgin birth was prophesied and recorded in the Old Testament. But I don’t expect you believe in any supernatural intervention. Expand your mind and heart and get to know this virgin born Son of God and God the Son

        • Chris Malan says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 11:52 pm

          I’ve read the Bible through several times. Not once have I come across ‘God the Son.’ Son of God, yes. Also, there is no mention of God the Holy Spirit. There is just Jesus saying the Father is ‘the only true God’ (John 17:3) and Paul saying ‘for us, there is one God, the Father.’ And also, of course, Jesus saying the Father is his (Jesus’s) God and our God.

        • Champ says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 4:05 pm

          The virgin birth was prophesied and recorded in the Old Testament.

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Indeed, R Russell …

          Question: “Where does the Old Testament predict the coming of Jesus Christ?”

          Answer: There are many Old Testament prophecies about Jesus Christ. Some interpreters place the number of Messianic prophecies in the hundreds. The following are those that are considered the clearest and most important.

          Regarding Jesus’ birth—Isaiah 7:14: “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.” Isaiah 9:6: “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” Micah 5:2: “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

          Concerning Jesus’ ministry and death—Zechariah 9:9: “Rejoice greatly, O Daughter of Zion! Shout, Daughter of Jerusalem! See, your king comes to you, righteous and having salvation, gentle and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey.” Psalm 22:16-18: “Dogs have surrounded me; a band of evil men has encircled me, they have pierced my hands and my feet. I can count all my bones; people stare and gloat over me. They divide my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing.”

          Likely the clearest prophecy about Jesus is the entire 53rd chapter of Isaiah. Isaiah 53:3-7 is especially unmistakable: “He was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, and familiar with suffering. Like one from whom men hide their faces he was despised, and we esteemed him not. Surely he took up our infirmities and carried our sorrows, yet we considered him stricken by God, smitten by him, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all. He was oppressed and afflicted, yet he did not open his mouth; he was led like a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth.”

          The “seventy sevens” prophecy in Daniel chapter 9 predicted the precise date that Jesus, the Messiah, would be “cut off.” Isaiah 50:6 accurately describes the beating that Jesus endured. Zechariah 12:10 predicts the “piercing” of the Messiah, which occurred after Jesus died on the cross. Many more examples could be provided, but these will suffice. The Old Testament most definitely prophesies the coming of Jesus as the Messiah.

          https://www.gotquestions.org/Old-Testament-Christ.html

      • Kepha says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 7:42 pm

        Regardless, I will continue to confess that Christ was “conceived of the Holy Ghost” as the Creed affirms. The angel also said to Mary, “the Holy Spirit shall come upon thee, and the power of the MOst High shall overshadow thee: (Lk. 1:35). The same Holy Spirit who hovered over the face of the waters at the first creation (Gn. 1:2) is there at the inception of the new creation.

        The importance of the virgin birth of Christ is that it shows there’s a new beginning for humanity, a second Adam (for we confess Christ’s complete and true humanity as well as his complete and true deity).

        Billybob, as a Protestant Christian, I’m not throwing mud at the Romans here. As for original sin, some of your saints of the scoffing cult, such as G.B. Shaw, used to say it was the one Christian dogma that could be empirically proven. Further, for people who are easy to control, just say some piece of nonsense prefaced with “Science Says”, and you have the supposed “skeptics” by the 外卵.

  17. JawsV says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 2:44 pm

    Morons. Scottish morons.

    • Ecosse1314 says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 2:48 pm

      Actually the Pisky church is mainly attended by English incomers. Just thought i would mention it.

      • Carlos Danger says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 3:05 pm

        white settlers

        • Ecosse1314 says

          Jan 11, 2017 at 3:08 pm

          Ha ha…you said it not me

    • Achmed says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 3:11 pm

      That is why, to this day, The Church of Scotland (many sincere thanks to John Knox) is still the official Scottish Church. They leave the Anglican Church to English islamophiliacs.

      • Ecosse1314 says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 3:16 pm

        Really!!!!!…think you will find the Church of Scotland almost as liberal as the piskys.As for John Knox never forgiven the bastard for the murder of Cardinal Beaton………ok not a great Cardinal but a great fighter for the continued Scottish independence.

        • R Russell says

          Jan 11, 2017 at 4:27 pm

          Looks like you think the horrors at the Reformation were one sided. They were not. Read the biography of John Knox. Life wasn’t easy for him either. Then read the Reformation in Scotland to have your eyes opened.
          You do not understand how this also continued when the Scottish king took over the English throne and found out he could control the people because he was head of the Anglican church in England. Jamie Saxt tried to make Scotland Anglican as well for church and state are separate in Presbyterian Scotland. Scots had to fight to keep their way of life and the National Covenant was signed. Jamie saxt put all Presbyterian ministers out of their churches and it was punishable by death to go to worship under their ministry. Charles 1 continued the persecution. The Scottish Episcopal Church became the church of those who wanted to curry favour with the king.
          Look up what Jenny Geddes shouted out in St Giles Cathedral. It is amusing today but was deadly serious then, (and I mean deadly)
          End of history lesson.

      • R Russell says

        Jan 11, 2017 at 4:12 pm

        The church of Scotland is now heretical in its own way too. Many, ministers and members have left for that reason

        • Ecosse1314 says

          Jan 11, 2017 at 4:45 pm

          Mr Russell….i am quite au fait with my countrys history. I am merely quoting my views if that is ok with you.

    • R Russell says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:20 pm

      Your insults and hatred have been noted by the One who died and rose again for those who need his sacrifice – and that includes you.

      • Phil Copson says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 4:32 pm

        R Russell – you are as mad as a muslim.

        You don’t like what someone has to say, so you threatening to set your vengeful god onto him.

        This makes you far worse than the person with whose views you disagree.

        Lucky there isn’t one really with people of your gang-mentality about.

        • R Russell says

          Jan 13, 2017 at 5:52 am

          By name calling you are trying to silence me. You can believe what you like by name calling the Judeo-Christian God. Many people do that so they can feel superior to him.
          You are entitles to your views about me – someone you have never met. Go ahead!! It tell readers more about you than it does about me

  18. Ecosse1314 says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 2:58 pm

    Just to confirm the make-up of Scotland re: the last census was roughly 35% presbyterian 16% RC …..muslims are 1.4% and i suspect the episky church is around 1%. Sadly about 35% were atheist or agnostic.

  19. Carlos Danger says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 3:04 pm

    This is an outrage.

  20. Salome says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 3:57 pm

    Unfortunately, Epiphany has been the Feast of Religious Relativism for many years in some circles.

  21. R Russell says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 4:10 pm

    There is an error here. There are only 2 Anglican churches in Scotland. This is NOT one of them. This church is correctly called within the text of the article as a Scottish Episcopal cathedral. It is NOT an Anglican cathedral.
    http://thecathedral.org.uk/
    Scroll down the website and you will see the sign for all Scottish Episcopal churches.
    Strangely it also offers a course on basic Christianity.
    It also has an article about this matter reported here.
    That aside chrislam appears to be alive and well in the Anglican Communion.
    They don’t seem to know the Muslims and Christians worship different Gods.

    • Ecosse1314 says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 4:47 pm

      Mibbe aye mibbe naw. In Scotland most people regard the pisky church as an arm of the Anglican church.

      • R Russell says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 3:24 pm

        I doubt there are many in Scotland who could explain the difference between the Church of Scotland and the Episcopal church in Scotland. I also doubt they would know it is part of the Anglican Communion.
        However what is to be noted in your post is your dismissal of my correction.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 8:26 pm

      They don’t seem to know the Muslims and Christians worship different Gods
      =====================
      Allah is not God. He’s the other guy.

      • R Russell says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 3:25 pm

        You mean the god of this world?

        • Peggy says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 5:31 pm

          Would that be Obama?

  22. Brodie says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 4:46 pm

    The whole reason for Jesus taking on the tent of human flesh through the seed of a woman is to be kin to mankind. Since the fetus develops it’s own blood and is completely separate from the blood of the mother, Adam’s cursed blood is not in him. This one thing allows Jesus to take on the sins of all mankind and drink from the cup of God’s wrath in our stead. If Jesus had one drop of Adam’s curse tainted blood in him he himself could not be the pure Sacrificial Lamb, and all hope for us would be lost. That is why Jesus is the only BEGOTTEN Son of God, no other human can stand before God blameless and take the punishment we so richly deserve.
    .
    To deny Jesus’s devine conception is to deny just who Jesus is and what he did. That IS the Unpardonable Sin, the one thing that will condemn you to Hell, and eventually the Lake of Fire. Deny Jesus and he will deny you to the Father.
    .
    If you find that your church follows along this silliness, saying that Jesus is not the son of God; or even allows this kind of message to go fourth – RUN from it, DO NOT LOOK BACK. They have forsaken the truth and are headed for damnation; don’t let them take you down with them!

    • Peggy says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 8:29 pm

      You’re absolutely right but not everyone can think like you do.
      I feel for the poor simple folk who have put all their trust in their pastor and don’t know any better.

      • Kay says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 10:56 am

        We must pray that God shields them. But for those of us who can run or speak, we must.

  23. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 4:49 pm

    mr spencer,are you scared that reading the quran to the hearing could lead to the collapse of your mithraist christianity,?in that case many blindfoded followers could be enlightened to undstand that it is a supidity to the core for someone to believe that god the amighty,the powerful,could have a son among human beings, and this human son became god himself to be worshiped.this is a carbon copy of pagan mithraism of old inspired by the devil.

    • billybob says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 5:01 pm

      Ibrahim – Believing Jesus to be the Son of God is no harder than believing what the Quran says about the physical nature of Allah. Watch this…

      Allah the Man God, Part Two: Allah’s Body and Solid Shape
      https://youtu.be/tdta81E8IY4

      • R Russell says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 3:34 pm

        He’s just winding you up. Don’t respond, he is demonised and making a fool of you.
        After all he believes a horse flew Mohammed to heaven, but it took years to find out (convenient) that he took of from Jerusalem.

        • Peggy says

          Jan 12, 2017 at 5:35 pm

          It wasn’t the flying carpet?

        • R Russell says

          Jan 13, 2017 at 5:45 am

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buraq

    • Ecosse1314 says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 5:03 pm

      Idiot….even in your saddo cult it is accepted God cannot be bound. Therefore if God chooses to appear on earth as his son then so be it.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 8:45 pm

      Muslim supremacist ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:

      mr (sic) spencer,are (sic) you scared that reading the quran (sic) to the hearing could lead to the collapse of your mithraist (sic) christianity,?in (sic) that case many blindfoded (sic) followers could be enlightened to undstand (sic) that it is a supidity (sic) to the core for someone to believe that god the amighty,the (sic) powerful,could (sic) have a son among human beings, and this human son became god himself to be worshiped.this (sic) is a carbon copy of pagan mithraism (sic) of old inspired by the devil.
      ………………………………

      What rot. The issue is whether Christians should have to host such dishonest, supremacist Muslims. There is no reason why they should.

      Would muhammed be fine with those critical of Islam preaching in Mosques?

      And muhammed’s claims about Mitharism are ridiculous. MIthraism has nothing to do with Christianity. But Muslims constantly claim that Christianity is “pagan”, in attempts to discredit it.

      Far more salient, Muslims regularly *murder* Christians for believing that Jesus is the Son of God.

    • CogitoErgoSum says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 10:16 pm

      Ibrahim, your comment indicates that you need to do a little more studying concerning the nature of God as set forth in the New Testament.

      Look at John 1:1: “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God.”

      By “Word” John means Jesus. John tells us Jesus did not become God; Jesus always was God and always will be God. He is the Alpha and the Omega and He is one of the three making up the Holy Trinity …. which always was and forever will be.

      I realize the concept of one God consisting of Father, Son and Holy Spirit is difficult to grasp but when commenting upon the nature of Christ and God, one should at least know the basics about the Holy Trinity.

      But then again even Muhammad got the Trinity wrong. He thought Christians believed Mary was part of the Trinity. Muhammad seems not to have had any inkling at all about the Holy Spirit …… such was his limited knowledge concerning this matter. His ignorance of what most Christians believed (and still believe) about God is quite evident … as is yours.

    • FYI says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 12:03 pm

      And “allah”/mahomets encouraging the breaking of God’s commandments by the koran is OK is it??
      The koran contains teachings that violate God’s commandments.
      How amazing that muslims don’t understand that!!

  24. dragaozao says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 5:21 pm

    Ah! The Western civilization… so lost! So confused!

  25. davej says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 5:34 pm

    Groveling idiots. Don’t they realize that Islam is strictly a one way street?

  26. mortimer says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 5:48 pm

    Mark Durie an Anglican theologian in Australia has explained why all Christian churches should avoid prayers with Muslims for the reason that most Muslim prayers contain supremacist parts that call for the defeat and destruction of Christianity. Michael Nazir-Ali whom referred to above is actually the Anglican BISHOP Michael Nazir-Ali, now one of Britain’s leading counterjihadists.

    His website contains his denunciation of the clergy in Scotland: http://www.michaelnazirali.com/

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 9:39 pm

      Yes–important stuff.

  27. mike ryan says

    Jan 11, 2017 at 6:35 pm

    This sickens me, and I’m a Jew. I have NO respect for “Christians” who betray their faith.

    • Peggy says

      Jan 11, 2017 at 8:34 pm

      Sadly, both Christian and Jews have traitors ready to pull the rest of us down.
      I too am horrified that so many Christians and Jews are ready to hand their people to the devil.
      We need each other now more than ever.

  28. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 12:45 am

    billybob,it is a lie.allah is not an image.he is spiritual.no one ever saw him,except after death which is spiritual .he is beyond human comprehension.you can only communicate through intensive spiritual activities.this is what the quran told us.but your mithraist pagan bible says god can descend so low to human son who became god himself, killed by mortal humans.this is a stupidity believing that this process is a way of forgiving your original sin, which is also an injustice for one to be punished for sin he did not commit.this fallacy attributed to prophet isa(alaihissalam)was designed by the devil couched from mithraism inspired by the same devil.

    • billybob says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 6:27 am

      I must admit I have difficulty with the concept myself. But I have far more difficulty believing Muhammad was a prophet.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:03 pm

      More from ibrahim itace muhammed:

      billybob,it (sic) is a lie.allah (sic) is not an image.he (sic) is spiritual.no (sic) one ever saw him,except (sic) after death which is spiritual .he (sic) is beyond human comprehension.you (sic) can only communicate through intensive spiritual activities.
      ……………………………………………

      “Intensive spiritual activities”? You mean like these?

      “He said that raping me is his prayer to God”

      https://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/08/he-said-that-raping-me-is-his-prayer-to-god

      “Hamas: ‘Killing Jews is worship that draws us close to Allah’”

      https://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/11/hamas-killing-jews-is-worship-that-draws-us-close-to-allah

      Yes–these atrocities are what Muslims consider “spiritual”. *Ugh*.

      More:

      this (sic) is what the quran (sic) told us.but your mithraist (sic) pagan bible (sic) says god (sic) can descend so low to human son who became god (sic) himself, killed by mortal humans.this (sic) is a stupidity believing that this process is a way of forgiving your original sin, which is also an injustice for one to be punished for sin he did not commit.this (sic) fallacy attributed to prophet isa(alaihissalam)was (sic) designed by the devil couched from mithraism (sic) inspired by the same devil.
      ……………………………………………

      billybob, didn’t I note that muhammed would regard you as Christian–despite your not only making it clear that you are not Christian, but your being actually critical of that faith?

      I know you’ve said before that you hope muhammed and Muslims like him come to the West to see how nice we are–are you *still* sure you consider that wise?

  29. Champ says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 1:06 am

    What insanity allowing the unholy quran; a verse which denies the son of God, be read in a Christian church—shame on the leadership!

    • ibrahim itace muhammed says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 1:36 am

      champ, your mithraist evil bible was inspired by the devil.are words of the devil holy?never,they are filthy!!

      • Baucent says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 2:28 am

        What about the so called “Angel Gabriel” who spoke to your prophet? The Devil masquerading as an “angel of light”. It was a masterly deception that continues to trap fools like you to this day.

      • CogitoErgoSum says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 3:03 am

        Ibrahim, look at Quran 5:46, 47:

        46. “After them we sent forth Jesus, the son of Mary, confirming the Torah already revealed, and gave him the Gospel, in which there is guidance and light, corroborating what was revealed before it in the torah, a guide and admonition to the righteous.

        47. Therefore let those who follow the Gospel judge according to what God has revealed therein. Evil-doers are those that do not judge according to God’s revelations.

        According to the Quran the Torah and the Gospel (which I assume was very different from the New Testament) were correct during the time of Jesus. If the current Torah and the Gospel (which is now the New Testament) are corrupt the changes must have taken place sometime after the disappearance? of Jesus. It is a miracle of the Satanic kind that no traces of the “original” versions have ever been found on the face of the Earth. If your god, Allah, is not capable of protecting his words from corruption before, what makes you so confident that the same thing has not happened with the Quran? The Quran was put together from various scraps of verses found after Muhammad’s death and that would have left the door wide open for the compilation of a book so corrupt that not even a single word in it can now be trusted. In fact, I think that is exactly the case.

      • Kay says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 3:56 am

        i-
        None of what you said is true.

        Champ reads the Word of the true God. God asks us to choose life. Compare what you know to that standard: does it promote and protect life?
        The devil can be deceiving, speaking with partial truth, attempting to allure and confuse.

      • FYI says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 11:50 am

        Given that your koran encourages evil and promotes the breaking of God’s commandments given to Moses it is obvious that your unholy book was inspired by the satanic,mass murdering,polygamist, false prophet mahomet.

        My God.how blind you muslims are to the Truth!How lost are your souls!

        Mithraism,by the way, died out in the 5th Century.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 3:14 pm

        ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:

        champ, (sic) your mithraist (sic) evil bible (sic) was inspired by the devil.are (sic) words of the devil holy?never,they (sic) are filthy!!
        ……………………………………

        What sort of things do Muslims consider to be inspired by the devil?

        “…Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.”

        “Do to others as you would have them do to you.”

        “Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good.”

        “Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers over a multitude of sins.”

        “There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear…We love because he first loved us.”

        “Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails…”

        *These* are the sort of things pious Muslims consider “filthy”. *Very* telling.

  30. Baucent says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 2:23 am

    Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali is a good man who has frequently spoken out against Islamization. He himself a Christian of Pakistani origin, he knows what he is talking about and has the courage to speak.

    • Kay says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 4:05 am

      I wonder if he has something for our Catholic bishops’ conference to hear.

  31. Chris Malan says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 2:58 am

    The point, completely missed in this article, is what the person who read this bit out of the Koran had to say about it. Was it to show how mistaken Islam is? Did this person endorse this part of the Koran, saying in effect Christians have it wrong?

    Unless one allows contrary views to be examined, one is just making propaganda. My faith is fact based, it can withstand other points of view by putting what I believe next to these other points of view and dispassionately examining both.

    • Kay says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 4:03 am

      Chris,
      I’m glad your faith is strong and you are not tossed here and there.
      There is a difference between merely reading something or even reading to study it and proclaiming something as part of a worship service.
      Reading from the Koran does not belong in a Christian worship service.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:20 pm

      Chris, this is not about debating the tenets of faith–this is about supremacist Muslims being allowed to preach hatred of Christianity from the pulpit during a church service.

      This will only embolden supremacist Muslims, and that puts *everybody* in the West in further danger–Christian or not.

      • Phil Copson says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 4:48 pm

        Chris – that is “a” point, not “the” point.

        If Christians and Muslims wish to discuss the meanings of each other’s texts, that is their choice, but this should be carried out as a meeting with contributors from either side, and in neutral territory.

        The pulpit is for making declarations, not for airing discussion points.

        The fact that the reading was made in a language that the Christians couldn’t understand, shows that the intention was not to impart information or to spark discussion, but simply to mark their “territory” by peeing up the Christians’ lamp-post.

        As Marshall McLuhan didn’t quite say: “The muslim was the message.”

      • Chris Malan says

        Jan 12, 2017 at 11:59 pm

        Not if Islam is clearly shown to have only one basis, belief that Mohammed REALLY got revelations from the angel Gabriel in a cave or caves near Mecca and both Christianity and Judaism have real history behind them with corroboration from outside sources.

        Allowing only one position to be heard and suppressing all others is propaganda. Paul said, examine all things, keep what is good. If a position is suppressed, there will always be people wondering if it is not true, after all. Better clearly show it to be false.

        • Kay says

          Jan 13, 2017 at 2:05 am

          Chris,
          A debate floor or discussion hall or even blog commentaries are places to voice all opinions.
          If you are wondering what is false or true, please talk in person to people you trust.

          A church service is not a discussion hall, nor was the Muslim chanting the Koran as part of a discussion.
          A church service is where God is praised, where the word of God (i.e. the Bible) is spoken and sometimes commented on, where prayers are made to the God of the Bible in faith and participation in worship is undertaken by faithful Christians.

          It’s not really that hard to understand. With a risk of seeming to minimize religion, I’ll give you an analogy. One might like to figure out whether one likes basketball or lacrosse but the middle of a soccer game is no time to start playing those games.

        • Peggy says

          Jan 15, 2017 at 5:54 pm

          A church service is not a debate. People who subscribe to that belief are not there to debate whether they are right or wrong or whether another religion might have good points.
          They are not there to be offered samples of other religions in order to decide if they are in the right place.
          There is a time and place for everything and a debate on religion does not belong in a church. It belongs in a lecture hall or some seminar.

          Do you not get that? How confusing would it be for people to attend their Sunday service to hear how wonderful Islam is?
          Is a church a recruiting centre for other religions?

  32. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 3:58 am

    cogitoergosum,the quran is refering to the messages sent by allah to prophets issa and musa in injeel and taurat.but your evil bible was concocted centuries after the departure of prophet issa by assembling some hearsays about prophet issa and mixed them with pagan doctrines from mithraism of old.tell me was the bible recorded in the presence of prophet issa(jesus)as the quran was recorded in the presence of prophet muhammed who checked what was recorded and confirmed it?note, the quran as final revelation from allah serves as criterion and filter(furqan)to flush out falsities imported into the messages sent to previous prophets.this is a directive from almighty god the sender.but you disagree and stick to falsehood.what will be your fate who disagree with what the original sender decreed?your deeds will not be accepted.you are just wasting your time and energy.

    • billybob says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 6:37 am

      Ibrahim – here is irrefutable logic showing that your position is unsustainable…

      The Islamic Dilemma regarding the Quran and Bible explained by David Wood
      https://youtu.be/v2_0Z62-GO8

      • ibrahim itace muhammed says

        Jan 13, 2017 at 4:54 am

        billybob, i have gone through the david or devil wood’s fallacy.there is no dilemma for muslims.the quran affirmed what prophet isa and musa taught,not the bible concocted centuries after the departure of jesus. i did said the bible is a mixture of some hearsays of what jesus taught and pagan doctrines couched from mithraism.i also cited what transpired between prophet muhammad and catholic christians from najran who paid him courtesy visit where he observed that their mode of worship resembled that his brother in monotheism prophet isa,except that they missed the truth along the line that jesus was not god or son of god,which is a pagan doctrine of mithraism inserted in john of the bible.in fact it is because of such traces of jesus’s teachings,even though mixed with paganism, that the quran invited ignorant pagan arabs to ask christians and jews in possession of written books then to confirm the stories narrated in the quran.according to some islamic scholars the israelite stories can be used to interprete the quran,but with caution because of lies mixed therein.in one of my debates with a christian evangelist called sam shamoun i thrashed this sickness of christian critics of islam that the quran affirmed the bible in many suras. i said no, it is not the bible perse that the quran affirmed.it affirmed the original teachings of all previous prophets, including jesus and moses the traces of which can be found in the bible.hence, any part of the bible that condicts other verses of the quran rejecting pagan doctrines inserted in the bible shall be deemed not taught by jesus and moses.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:46 pm

      Of course, ibrahim itace muhammed is unable to answer CogitoErgoSum’s questions. This should not surprise.

    • CogitoErgoSum says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 8:50 pm

      Ibrahim, I have shown you that Allah says in the Quran that the Torah at the time of Jesus contained the truth. Jesus used the Torah as part of His teachings …. teachings which the Quran identifies as the Gospel. But what were the teachings of Jesus if the Torah we have now is not the one Jesus used? What was the Gospel of Jesus if what we have now of the “Gospel of Jesus” is a lie and its truth lost? If everything that Jesus taught was corrupted or lost, what did Jesus achieve in His time upon the Earth? According to Muhammad the answer is absolutely nothing. According to Muhammad Jesus was a completely inept and ineffective Prophet who was benched before the game was over …… which is an insult to Jesus In fact, according to the Quran and Muhammad every Prophet who came before Muhammad was a complete failure and the message of each and every Prophet was lost until Muhammad came along to set things straight. That entire claim rests on the word of one man and one man alone …….. Muhammad. This is absolutely too much for me to swallow.

      It is perfectly clear to me that Muhammad was a self-serving liar. I’ll say that again: MUHAMMAD WAS A SELF-SERVING LIAR and I will be proud to repeat it if God asks me about my beliefs on judgment day. Anyone who believes any word in the Quran is being played for a fool by a dead man who believed that all other men were fools to be manipulated and used for personal gain.

      Sorry you have been fooled, Ibrahim. If you follow the Quran it will lead you to a dead end and its logic will leave you twisted in knots.

      You can believe me or not …… it’s up to you ….

  33. Brian says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 6:36 am

    As an Anglican with Scottish ancestry I am very disappointed at this back down to a vile pseudo political/religion of hate. I feel ashamed to now acknowledge my ancestry.

    • R Russell says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:38 pm

      Why are you ashamed? Did your ancestors do this heresy?

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:47 pm

      Don’t be ashamed–fight for your proud heritage.

  34. Rev Donald Spitz says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 9:17 am

    This is blasphemy against the Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Bible. As the author said, one does not see any Bible reading going on in the mosques.

    • Chris Malan says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 11:42 pm

      That is because Islam is all propaganda. It cannot stand factual comparison to either Judaism or Christianity. Any truth based position can stand comparison to other positions. Like Pauls said, test all things, keep what is true.

  35. R Davis says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 12:51 pm

    QURAN (19: 23)
    Then the birth pangs drove her to the trunk of a palm tree and she said: “Oh, would that I have died before this and had been all forgotten.”

    It sounds very dramatic .. doesn’t it .. poor Mary with sever labor pains .. stumbling about outside. In fact .. women of Mary’s time gave birth at home surrounded & assisted by the other women of the family.

    But this did not happen in Mary’s case .. Joseph .. her lawful husband & she were said to be on their way to Bethlehem to attend the Census of Quiriniu.
    I personally believe that Joseph & Mary were running for their lives .. that they were actually on their way to Egypt where they had friends & family. Had King Herod’s soldiers caught them & realized that the Mary was carrying the child that they were looking for .. they would have cut Mary’s belly open to get at the unborn child .. Joseph would have tried to assist Mary & all three would have been slaughtered.
    Mary fell into labor .. most likely as a result of fear & distress & the stress of riding the donkey .. was Jesus a premature birth ?.. it is entirely possible .. Mary was about 14 -15 years old & Joseph was about 18 years old .. mere children.
    God .. in His infinite wisdom chose innocent children to bring Jesus into the world of mortals.
    Jesus was the result of one cell dividing – a miracle conception.

    • R Davis says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 12:55 pm

      Regarding the conception & birth of Jesus Christ ..
      GOD DID THIS – NOT MAN.
      It is not for any man to know or question the Hand of God & His Infinite wisdom.

    • R Russell says

      Jan 12, 2017 at 3:41 pm

      If it was one cell dividing he would have been a girl for there is no Y chromozome

  36. Michael Johnson says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 3:13 pm

    What kind of coward pastors are these who does this if I was a pastor no way would I even think of reading the Quran in the Church no way

  37. UNCLE VLADDI says

    Jan 12, 2017 at 11:10 pm

    Of course they did.

    These are dishonest and self-servingly hypocritical religions-salesmen, not truly honestly religious people.

  38. Thomas Wakefield says

    Jan 13, 2017 at 6:11 pm

    Another complete miss on the context of what the church was doing. Robert and the rest of You complainers go READ the whole story GET THE CONTEXT on the church making the point on how wrong the basis of Islam actually is. I really appreciate Jihad Watch AND Robert you’ve got blind spot where You miss context and screw up the credibility jumping to conclusions.

  39. Sara Hedvicak says

    Jan 14, 2017 at 5:42 am

    Maybe consider fact-checking your story before publishing it and disseminating unnecessary hatred next time 😉
    http://thurible.net/2017/01/13/keeping-the-faith/

    • Robert Spencer says

      Jan 14, 2017 at 11:28 am

      There is not a single detail in the piece to which you link that contradicts anything in the report we posted. In fact, the piece to which you linked even has Kelvin admitting that the Qur’an was read in the cathedral, and that the passage denied the divinity of Christ. He just justifies doing so. We disagree. But your claim that our report contains factual errors in itself needs to be fact-checked, and has been found wanting.

  40. Michael Irvine says

    Jan 16, 2017 at 7:46 am

    I am deeply distressed as my heritage comes directly from the Lay Abbots of Dunkeld and the reburial place of St Columba from Iona after the Viking invasions of the Western Isles. St Andrew, St Columba and St Margaret must be in tears with our Lord and our Lady over this blasphemy.

    we must all pray for peace, and who is to say that an Islamic person present at St Mary’s may convert to Christianity. God’s ways are not our ways. He must have his reasons for allowing this to happen.

    As far as Christianity being a religion of peace and tolerance as it is, Jesus himself threw the Merchants and money lenders out of the temple upturning tables etc. He was defending his Father’s house.

    Imagine if a neighbour came into your home, sat and had a meal and your company, then stood up and called your Mother or Father by obscene names, what would you do.?

    This action by the Episcopal church will hopefully make true believers in Christ stronger and non believers weaker. It always looks darker just before the dawn. Hope for a beautiful future for it is at our doorstep for those whom believe in the one true church.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Infidel on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.