• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Trump at CIA: “We have to get rid of ISIS. We have no choice….This is a level of evil that we haven’t seen”

Jan 21, 2017 4:38 pm By Robert Spencer

“We have to get rid of ISIS. We have no choice. Radical Islamic terrorism, and I said it yesterday, has to be eradicated, just off the face of the earth. This is evil. This is evil….This is a level of evil that we haven’t seen. And you’re going to go it and you’re going to do a phenomenal job, but we’re going to end it. It’s time. It’s time right now to end it.”

As I said when he said it yesterday, it isn’t possible to eradicate “radical Islamic terrorism” (which is actually orthodox and mainstream in Islam) as long as there are people who believe the Qur’an is the perfect and eternal word of Allah. There will always be some believers who get the idea that they can please Allah by killing and being killed for him (cf. Qur’an 9:111). However, Trump’s declaration, while hyperbolic, was a welcome indication of his apparent determination to speak honestly about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, and to combat it and roll it back.

Also, to call it “evil,” after eight years of moral equivocation and obfuscation, is as refreshing as Ronald Reagan’s calling the Soviet Union an “evil empire,” in the midst of a similar period of equivocation and cowardice. It is welcome to have that kind of moral clarity back in the White House. President Trump clearly hopes to emulate Reagan by destroying the Islamic State just as Reagan’s actions led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. That collapse didn’t end Communism, which is alive and well in the Democratic Party and on U.S. university campuses, but it did deal it a significant blow. If Trump ends the Islamic State, it won’t end Islamic jihad, but it will deal it a significant blow. After so many years of ignoring, enabling, explaining away, and blaming itself for that jihad, the United States is finally getting back on track.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: CIA, Donald Trump, Featured, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh) Tagged With: Mike Pompeo


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Champ says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 4:45 pm

    GO TRUMP!!

    • Champ says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 5:16 pm

      What an awesome speech!! Wow on day one Donald is already making America great again!! FINALLY as Americans we have *great* LEADERSHIP!! And I finally I feel real Hope & Change …for a change!! 😀

      • Kay says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 8:11 pm

        Champ, your excitement is refreshing.
        I live in a city where the police had to be out yesterday to control violence and businesses closed early to avoid it and today thousands marched and even preschoolers talk about the new President as a bad guy and jerk.

        It’s good to know there really is celebration!

        • J D S says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:25 am

          If all of America don’t believe in a Trump plan..he will have a hard time putting his plans to work..Note idid not say he would NOT be able. too implement his plans just he. will have a HARD time.

          Like Robert said in the above piece…eradicating Islamic radicalism is impossible unless muslims first learn that if they kill or are being killed for killing. ..they will go to hell and not paradise

        • Anne Smith says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 11:45 am

          Unfortunately Kay’s experience is only too common. I have just returned from a Conference where I was stunned by the stupidity of the women shouting and shrieking about how awful it was that Hillary was defeated by a “sexist racist oaf”. There seems to be a sort of stupidity about these women that is beyond any reasoned argument.
          When i asked about Hillary – the so called “feminist” – taking support from misogynistic, women stoning Saudi Arabia and Qatar I was treated as an idiot who didn’t know what she was talking about.
          We have a long way to go to get these daft Clinton supporters to pipe down and face reality. They are so noisy and aggressive that people who disagree with them and know better are cowed into silence.

        • TERRY says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 5:45 pm

          I would ask those idito women, about Hilalry Clinton DEFENDING A RAPIST OF A 12 YEAR OLD. OF BAD MOUTHING AND DEFAMILG ALL OF THE WOMEN THAT HER HUSBAND SLEPT WITH, AFTER MARRIAGE.

          AND, IF PRESIDENT TRUMP IS SO BAD-HOW COME-OUT OF 3,144 COUNTIES IN THE US (IN LOUISIANA, PARISHES, SAME THING) HE WON (EITHER) A PLURALITY OR MAJOIRTY IN 3,044 ( NUMBERS FROM GOOGLE SEARCH).

          IF, AS PER WALL STREET JOURNAL, REMOVE 6 COUNTIES IN THE NEW YORK CITY AREA AND LOS ANGELES CAL., AREA- PRES. TRUMP WOULD AHVE HAD A SOLID MAJORITY OF THE POPULAR VOTE.

          NOTE- BOTH THE N.Y.C. AREA AND L.A., CAL AREA HAVE LARGE NUMBERS OF ILLEGALS- WHO MAYBE VOTED (PROBABLY, AND D) OR NOT ( DOUBTFUL, BY ME).

          SO, IN 3,084 COUNTIES, THE MAJPORITY OF THE PEOPLE ARE STUPID?

          ( MY EYES HURT- EASIER TO READ AS I TYPE, IF IN CAPS, NOT YELLING)

        • Rob Porter says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 4:00 pm

          Kay and Anne Smith, as a foreigner who has travelled the U.S. extensively, enjoyed great times and met some truly good people in camp sites, on aircraft flights, in restaurants and during business trips when I was treated me with great hospitality, it makes me sad to see America so divided and so full of irrational, hate-filled people who have no time for logic or truth. Such was the mentality of most of those women demonstrating yesterday. What an absurd and stupid lot many of them were! There was and is no interest in facts, truth and logic. Just absurdly mindless and plainly ugly.

          The thoroughly evil Barack Obama presidency spawned evil within the country and out of it. Rectifying this and creating a new spirit is going to take considerable effort, not only effort but a fight while the treacherous and treasonous left, aided and abetting by a thoroughly rotten media, makes every effort to destroy this presidency and bring down the country. Their ignorance and stupidity is astounding! The left is that evil and I hope that of this Donald Trump has no illusions, but he is a stubborn and determined man, rightly contemptuous of the left and it’s rotten media that he’ll do what he considers best and to hell with what the rotten left says or thinks – while they rant and rave. Possibly that mindlessly stupid women’s demonstration was good in this respect, it will have forewarned him graphically of the evil created by Obama and the vile George Soros. For all his treasonous or seditious actions in his land of adoption, hopefully Trump will find grounds for either putting Soros in prison, or rescinding his citizenship and sending this miserable skunk packing to a county where they will make short order of a truly disgusting creature.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 7:58 pm

          Yeah–my experience is like yours, Kay. Wall to wall protests, including an offshoot of a “drumming circle” noisily making its way up my street, constant helicopters overhead. All the local free papers are featuring ridiculous letters to the editors where everyone talks about their crying jags, and stupid articles on how to leave the country, which none of these leftist idiots are actually going to to. So tedious.

        • Champ says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 2:58 am

          Thank you, dear Kay! 🙂

        • Martin Ronczkowski says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 10:03 am

          The Problem is that all the Followers of Mr. Trump have Problem with fact´s – the truth.
          But time will tell

      • Gary says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 7:38 am

        YES!!!! Hope and change!!!

        …and this time, there will be action,(For good, and not evil), not empty words.

      • Peggy says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 8:29 pm

        I love Australia and have never wished to live anywhere else but now I wish I lived in the US.
        Americans have hope now. You have a president who really cares about his country and is brave to go to work fixing problems the traitors have left.
        I wish we had someone like Donald Trump. Yes, we have some politicians like Pauline Hanson and a couple of others but the system is different here. We don’t have a president so getting one of those small parties elected is near impossible.
        The best we can hope for is to have enough patriots elected and united to force the two main parties into working for us.

        Congratulations to you all. I am truly happy for you and the world is a little safer now.

        • John C. Barile says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 11:10 pm

          Best wishes to you, Peg, from the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.

    • Champ says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 5:33 pm

      Robert, thank you for bringing us this video! …and the MSM probably won’t offer it.

      • Champ says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 7:48 pm

        I should clarify: thank you for bringing us this video in it’s *entirety* …since FOX just showed a very small segment of President Trump’s speech, at CIA Headquarters, but of course they didn’t show (not yet anyway) the portion where President Trump mentioned the importance of getting rid of ISIS; and how “evil” they are—apparently the unvarnished *truth* about ISIS is too hot to handle.

        • t. says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 9:40 pm

          Thanks Robert for the video, I hope that president Trump will stay the course till the end!

          What a mother f*cker of an ideology and belief system; the blood and charred flesh of hundreds of millions of human beings, over its 1400 years history, are on its hands!

        • Mr John says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 2:46 am

          Found exactly 6 distinct 666 hand sign from his speech;
          9:25, 9:44-9:49, 10:30-10:34, 11:42, 14:44 and 15:37.

          Watch him carefully! 😉

        • Kenneth Olson says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:27 am

          That 666 reference is odd at best. I suppose “Thumbs Up” means something somewhere. This is not a politician and please don’t try to find a”hidden” agenda. He will have a great staff to keep him on task.

    • Champ says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 5:53 pm

      Newsflash: Spicer just delivered a televised press release from the White House addressing the very issues that President Trump raised in this video regarding media dishonesty and how they’re going to “hold the press accountable moving forward”!! Woohoo what an exciting day!

      • Don McKellar says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 7:42 pm

        Agreed. A highly impressive first day from Trump and team. Putting notice on Islam, getting the rank and file of the CIA on team as HUGE Trump supporters and crushing the MSM lies, starting the process to end Obamacare with actual signed legislation the day before and continuing the process full-on, and hitting back hard on the mainstream media’s lies and attempts to shade the administration and putting them on their heals in front of the American public and proving they lied. Stunning. Absolutely stunning.

        • Champ says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 8:00 pm

          “Absolutely stunning”

          Indeed! When the press release broke and Sean Spicer spoke I was applauding because I was sooo excited that the Trump Administration boldly set the record straight and that they put the press on notice—about time someone did. Bravo President Trump!

        • Terry says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 8:16 pm

          The media still lies.

          Background- a few days ago, Castro-head of Housing Dept. announced- effective Jan 28, a 1/4 of 1% decrease in the cost of FHA (proper name MIP) insurance. Trump rescinded it.

          HEADLINE- TRUMP INCREASES TAXES ON MIDDLE CLASS.

          One.- would only apply to NEW LOANS closed after Jan 28. Two- they have a figure of $500 per year- don’t say where they get that figure (or, if they did, I missed it) (I used to be a mortgage broker).

          The FHA is a good source- but the insurance fund has to be kept solvent. UNDER OBAMA THE PREMIUM FOR THE MIP WAS RAISED A FEW TIMES.

          The down payment (on most) FHA loans is only 3.5% and the seller can pay 6% towards the buyer’s costs.

          There was no increase in “taxes on the middle class”. Never see that from reading the headline.

      • Carolyne says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:17 am

        I am very impressed by Mr. Trump’s first full day in office, but Obama’s minions are still around and still control the MSM so Mr. Trump will be challenged at every step. I think he is up to the task.

        I would prefer not to see that 666 nonsense, but I suppose everyone has a right of free speech, idiotic though it may be. I saw only A OK.

      • Carolyne says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 3:46 pm

        And the press didn’t like it one damn bit. Earlier, a Time magazine reporter had that the Bust of Martin Luther King had been removed from the oval Office. It had not. In fact, President Trump said that it was still there, but that a bust of Churchill had been returned to the Oval Office. He said it not the original bust and that PM May asked him if he wanted the original back (Obama had returned it to the English) and she said she would bring it with her,

        The reporter apologized to his “Colleagues” but not the President. It is Mr, Trump about whom he lied, not the press. They would never lie about each other, Just the President.

    • gungadin says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 2:43 am

      GOD…….I wish I had my youth back…I’d be there enlisting all over AGAIN !!

      GOD BLESS TRUMP !!

      • dsinc says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 9:48 am

        Hear, hear. Me too.

    • Ned Kelly says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 3:32 am

      One day they will thank him….

    • Bill says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 8:44 am

      What scares me most about this is that Trump seemed to be having to convince the CIA of the threat. Brennan has got to go and fast. Patriots within the CIA have to step up and disclose to their new superiors the full extent of Islamic infiltration of the CIA and other levels of government.

    • JIMJFOX says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 4:06 pm

      As others have said, he must include CAIR, INSA & all other Islamic support groups in the USA;
      plus expunging Obama’s coterie of Islamist ‘advisers’… first, define Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organisation.

    • VampireJack says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 5:58 am

      Inch Allah.

      The war that the islamists have been waging against the non believer finally has a POTUS who recognises it for what it is. FINALLY.
      It’s time for us to reclaim our lands.
      Black and white, and all in between.
      Christians/Hindus and all the other faiths.
      It’s time to unite and end the scourge of islam once and for all.

      And while we’re at it, can we get rid of the butthurt millennial snowflakes too?
      Our great ancestors will be rolling in their graves at our weak and pathetic the modern generation of western students have become.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 5:38 pm

        Vampire Jack, good to see you back.

  2. john spielman says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 4:49 pm

    AGREE! we all must work to discredit islam- which a doctrine of evil not seen by the western world since WW2 and Nazism. To me it is obvious that muhammed was a demon possessed mass murderer thief liar and pedophiel perevrt false prophet and allah is Satan of the Bible
    Why can’t western elites like the govt of the UK Canada France Germany etc see this truth??

    • PRCS says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 6:03 pm

      Discrediting islam is THE key.

      • Alexius Comnenus says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 6:23 pm

        Thanks be to the Almighty God to have finally a real President with love for this country and who is so anxious to expose and to contact the craziness of islam.
        The liberals, the perverts and the obamanites leftist are going nuts with these rallies.
        Let them march until they get tired.
        God bless America and this President and his Administration.
        It was a long eight years.

        • gungadin says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 2:46 am

          AMEN !! And Well Said !!

      • Demsci says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 12:15 am

        Agreed! For ” audiences” like teenagers, young adults, fence-sitters, undecideds. To give counterjihadists lots of knowledge and ammunition to argue with the political corrects and Muslims. And finally for those 2 categories themselves, with the hope to change the opinion of at least some of them and eventually, yes, to let (smart, honest, logical) Muslims leave Islam on a big enough scale.

        If Islam’s historic narrative will get thoroughly and widespread discredited, hopefully that will have the same effect on Islam as the effect that bible-criticism had on Christianity. Says Jay Smith, the man who shows how false the official historic narrative of Islam is.

        And David Wood painstakingly discredits Islam and especially Mohammed in his video’s where he analyses Quran and Hadiths very precisely and logically, in ‘fun Islamic facts”. And he does this, he says, every time a jihadist goes on a rampage!

        And to think that the administration of the US is agreeing with this ……!

        I guess I am as hopeful and cheerful as Champ right now!

    • Lukas says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 9:07 pm

      Now, how to do so without plunging Islamic countries to economic problems or civil war? Yes, I live in one (Indonesia). I willing to accept some of the radicals being killed, but not mean all muslims were shooting targets..

      Greetings from an Indonesian Christian.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 10:07 pm

        No one is talking about randomly shooting Muslims. Where did you get that claptrap from?

      • Demsci says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 12:27 am

        Well, when we act democratically and broadminded in the West we can say: Look, there are 2 sorts of societies; Democratic and Islamic. Yes, it is true that we call Islam “bad, evil, useless” etc.

        BUT we can abundantly show, through Islamic texts examination, showing the thinking of Islamic leaders and teachers, MEMRI TV etc. That our disapproval is in no way a one-way-street. But that “the other side” Islams texts and Muslims, gives us much vitriol as well, and much more at that.

        So finally there is balance and I guess the vast majority of democratic citizens is quite OK with the existence of Islamic countries and let the people of those organise societies in their own way.

        Just leave democratic and islamic nations alone and accept that both sides have criticism and even contempt for each other’s systems.

        But we can respect Muslims minding their own business on their own turf and leaving us to mind our own business on our turf.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 4:48 am

        Lukas

        How much *do* you know about Islam?

        have you read the Quran in a good translation (you also need to read the Sira of Ibn Ishaq, which is the canonical “Life” of Mohammed, and the Sahih Hadiths – Sahih Muslim, Sahih Bukhari, and Sahih Ibn Dawud are the main ones that matter)?

        If you have not read Mr Spencer’s “The Truth About Muhammad”, you *should*. The other two books you *must* read, as a Christian, in Indonesia, are by an Australian Anglican priest and linguist, Rev Dr Mark Durie. He first encountered Islam on the ground, in Aceh, when he was studying the language (as a linguist) and reading their jihad epics (all their ‘classical’ poetry is about jihad). He then began to study up on Islam, and has written two very important books – “The Third Choice: Islam, Dhimmitude, and Freedom”, and “Which God?” The second book examines the character of the Biblical God, with lots of references from the Old and the New Testament, and compares and contrasts with the character of ‘allah’ as described in the Islamic texts. The conclusion is that although Muslims will *claim* that they worship ‘the same god’, they do not. There is NO comparison, no overlap. Allah is a deceiver, a despot, hateful and capricious and does not love nor seek a relationship; the muslim believer is the grovelling slave of an uncaring despot. YHWH is faithful, loving, truthful, covenant-keeping; He calls us to be his beloved *children*.

        Durie has also written a short book to go with “The Third Choice”. It is called “Liberty to the Captives” and it is about the spiritual and psychological healing of those who have been either dhimmis or Muslims but have shaken off those chains.

        If you read Durie’s account of the Dhimma system you will understand a great deal about the way that Islam messes with the minds of non-Muslim persons who live within Muslim-dominated countries or regions. You will also understand exactly why it is so hard to get a new church built in Indonesia, and why so often a screaming Muslim mob turns up to attack a new church or to prevent it from being built – because *even though* the full Dhimma system is not in place ‘de jure’, **Muslims know** that non-Muslims in a Muslim state – and the Muslims *know* they are dominant numerically and politically in Indonesia – are NOT PERMITTED to build a new church or even fix up an existing one that requires repairs.

        I have every sympathy for you. But you are best served by being entirely free of any illusions about Islam, and Muslims.

        Even the nicest and apparently-quietest and friendliest Muslims around you are in thrall to a Death Cult, a religion of blood and war, a religion of Murder. They *might* apostasise and become Christians (at risk of their lives, because of the apostasy law of Islam); but on the other hand, they could, at any moment, and quite suddenly and unpredictably, Go Jihad. Or side with those who do. Christians in Iraq and Syria have been betrayed and ratted out to ISIS by Muslims with whom they had lived seemingly peacefully for years; Muslims that they thought were nice people, good neighbours. But when the crunch came, those very same nice, smiling Muslim neighbours were perfectly happy to hand them over to the ISIS slavers and mass-murderers. Those nice Muslims became Mohammed’s willing executioners…

        • BlueRaven says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 11:44 am

          Excellent points you raised there DD

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 8:59 pm

          +1

    • t. says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 9:32 pm

      “Why can’t western elites like the govt of the UK Canada France Germany etc see this truth??”

      The previous govt. of Stephen Harper, saw it and the majority of the Canadian electorate made them pay for it in the last elections!!!

    • Anne Smith says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 11:49 am

      It is worse than Nazism because it has penetrated so many countries and many adherents hold high offices now.

      The Nazi party was limited to Germany, until it began invading Poland, Austria France etc.

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 12:15 pm

      This conflict won’t be reconciled without violence of a Biblical scale.

      Were Churchill, Chamberlain, FDR, or Stalin able to talk Hitler out his aspirations? No.

      Could we talk Tojo into reigning it in? No. This is why we fought WWII, losing 407,300 American patriots.

      Let’s suppose we convince every Kaffir on Earth today that Islam is evil and must be “eliminated from the face of the Earth.”

      Then what?

      As with Hitler, the Muslims truly buy into Islam, and we’re not going to talk them out of their aspirations of a Worldwide Caliphate. People willing to murder their own children to please a fictional deity are deadly serious about their cause. They’ve been working toward their goal for 1400 years.

      The Ummah believes they’re winning this war, because they are. They believe we’re in the 11th hour of End Times, and they can taste victory. The Iranians aren’t about to give up their nuke program.

      The Ummah will never give up, certainly not with words. The only thing that will end this war is an enormous show of deadly force. They don’t fear and respect us. Nuclear weapons are required to earn their respect. We must show a willingness to use them against Dar al-Islam. They must see that Allah is never going to save them from total annihilation.

      We’re WAY past the point of a conventional solution. Dar al-Islam stretches from Morrocco to the Philippines covering a 3000 mile wide swath. There are 1.6 Billion Ummah in 57 Islamic countries. They also live among us, convincing the useful idiots they’re our friends.

      We just spent 15 years trying to control just 2 of the 57 Muslim countries: At a cost of $6.5 Trillion US and 6500 of our finest and bravest Americans. And what did we gain for that? NOTHING. Afghanistan and Iraq are much worse today than the day we first set foot there.

      We simply don’t have the money, military, time, and especially the WILL to indefinitely invade and occupy 57 Muslim countries conventionally. Not going to happen.

      Let’s face it. This will only be reconciled with nuclear weapons. No other options. We have these weapons for a reason.

      The Ummah has a gun pointed at us, and the Iranians are loading it up as fast as they can. When people are pointing loaded guns at us, we need not wait for them to pull the trigger before killing them first.

      So, let’s get the stomach and the will real quick. We can either strike first, or we can wait for the Iranians to vape Tel Aviv, Manhattan, or DC first. They promise to do this to us. No guesswork necessary. So why are we waiting?

      If the Ummah hits us with nukes first, igniting the Apocalypse, we’ll go down in history as the stupidest fools who ever lived.

      https://medium.com/@dantriplett/islamic-jihad-is-total-war-for-all-marbles-6c858098b76e#.f4gf6daol

      • t. says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 1:54 pm

        You provided good solid information and insight in your above comment, Daniel. Meanwhile, I don’t think that the leaders of countries such as the US, Russia, France or any other western power with nuclear capabilities will ever contemplate using the N-bomb against any Muslim country.

        Nevertheless, separation between Muslims and non Muslims is more feasible if the majority of people on this planet become more aware of Islam’s true nature and belief system.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:49 pm

          DJT has already said he’d have no problem using nuclear weapons if necessary. I believe him.

          I’m paraphrasing Putin, but he also said about the Syrian situation, “While we hope nuclear weapons won’t be necessary, we will do we must do to prevail.”

          Besides, the tactics and rules of war are determined by the tactics and rules our enemy elects to use.

          Iran has already promised to nuke Israel and the US as soon as they gain the capability. WHEN that happens, how do you see the 7 nuke Kaffir Heads of State responding?

          Regarding your second paragraph, you seem to be suggesting that education among Kaffir will better allow us to segregate ourselves from them. But that’s not good enough. Islam is rapidly EXPANDING, for starters, by birthrates and al-hijrah against our will. Secondly, Iran is building nuclear weapons they promise to use to kill us. These aren’t just people living in tents, pissing in the sand. They have plenty of money and stolen technology to build WMD.

          So, containment or isolationism just won’t work. We didn’t want to storm the Normandy Beaches; we had to.

          Whether by ICBM, nuke on a container ship, or nuke in a U-Haul driven into Times Square, it’s going to happen unless we stop them first.

      • Nancy Albert says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 8:07 pm

        Central and South American people were converted, almost 100% to Christianity within 100 years. Their religions were so brutal it was easy. Their beautiful children were having their hearts ripped out in public ceremonies. Now there are practically zero Incans and Aztecs.

        We could make this happen to Islam but it must be a worldwide movement! The plight of women in Islam should be what the march in DC yesterday was about. Media, academia and think tanks…. all must educate Western women about Islam.

        My God, I was shoved into a “woman studies” in college (class of 73) and not once did they mention Muslim women.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 8:49 pm

          Unlike 100 years ago, or more, we now have advanced weaponry to hasten compliance with our National Will.

          It’s a two pronged strategy: Violence and education (indoctrination). Both are required.

          The Ummah has no interest in anything we have to say as long as they believe they’re winning the war, which they are. Not until they begin to believe we may be technologically and intellectually superior will they be open to our indoctrination.

          I’m not saying you’re wrong about the plight of Muslim women, and the shameful ignorance of the Western World’s women about their hardships. You’re right.

          But as I say, even if we convince 100% of all Kaffir today that Islam must end through criminalization, that doesn’t end the war. Violence is still required to finish the job.

          However, nothing scares our adversaries more than an American people 100% galvanized with our National Objective. They’re students of history, and know that’s a losing proposition for them. Americans with resolute hearts and minds are invincible.

          This would be the best case scenario, and result in the least violence and fastest surrender.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 8:51 pm

          Unlike 100 years ago, or more, we now have advanced weaponry to hasten compliance with our National Will.

          It’s a two pronged strategy: Violence and education (indoctrination). Both are required.

          The Ummah has no interest in anything we have to say as long as they believe they’re winning the war, which they are. Not until they begin to believe we may be technologically and intellectually superior will they be open to our indoctrination.

          I’m not saying you’re wrong about the plight of Muslim women, and the shameful ignorance of the Western World’s women about their hardships. You’re right.

          But as I say, even if we convince 100% of all Kaffir today that Islam must end through criminalization, that doesn’t end the war. Violence is still required to finish the job.

          However, nothing scares our adversaries more than an American people 100% galvanized with our National Objective. Our enemies are students of history, and know that’s a losing proposition for them. Americans with resolute hearts and minds are invincible.

          This would be the best case scenario, and result in the least violence and fastest surrender.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 8:55 pm

          [Sorry for the duplicate]

      • Peggy says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:19 pm

        True, it is necessary to prepare for all that but who will give us the ok?
        When we get so many brainwashed people gathering and following idiots like Ashley Judd ( I still feel sick after hearing her) we have a huge task ahead of us.
        First we have to educate our own population about Islam and I am afraid that so many people have bought into this “religion of peace” rubbish that a large portion of a generation is lost already.
        We have to concentrate on educating current students but by the time they are ready to be fully functional, Muslims will breed so fast that their numbers will explode.
        We already have far too many in our countries to reverse anything.
        This is a huge job and we all have to be on the same page. Europe has to be receptive to the change. US and Russia cannot do it alone, not when Europe is bringing in as many Muslims as fast as they can.
        At least if we have a sensible government and we succeed in forcing MSM to be more honest we can keep the Muslims here relatively under control.
        First thing to be done is to ban George Soros and his NGOs in our countries. He can go back to Hungary and I know they will know how to deal with him.

  3. Adrian says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 4:51 pm

    Too bad Trump repeated that it is not “understandable” why Islamists are so hateful and evil… it is very understandable if only our politicos and media made a small effort to learn the sources and history…

    Fingers crossed some knowledgeable people like Ropbert Spencer will be invited back to give briefings in Washington!

    • Michael Copeland says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 4:57 pm

      “….excellent pattern…between us and you enmity and hatred forever….”
      Koran 60:4

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 10:43 pm

      Adrian wrote:

      Too bad Trump repeated that it is not “understandable” why Islamists are so hateful and evil… it is very understandable if only our politicos and media made a small effort to learn the sources and history…
      ……………………….

      One can read ” not understandable” in two ways, Adrian. The first is that Trump has no clue about why they are doing this; the second–and how I saw it–is that he is saying there is no excuse for it, and that he is not sympathetic to their viciousness, as are so many bleeding heart leftists..

      • Lesley says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 7:50 am

        @gravenimage: agreed. I take his comment to mean that their evil cruelty is not acceptable.

        President Trump is not a talker, but he is a brilliant guy and a doer.

        He’s going to fix this big league!

      • PRCS says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:23 am

        It is difficult to imagine that no knowledgeable member of his staff (I’m sure there a few) has explained the basics to him.

        Hoping he gets up to speed on this quickly.

        To Lesley: I hope he makes clear what drives that cruelty, that such beliefs have no place in the 21st century, and that he does it in a manner that puts our Muslim “allies” on the spot.

        • Anne Smith says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 11:50 am

          I would think Steve Bannon is well aware of the thrust of the Koran judging by some of the articles in Breitbart.

      • Adrian says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 2:41 pm

        Thanks graven image, i really hope u are correct!..

        My fear is that the political pressure might become so overwhelming that Trump might have to dilute his stance… (Recently on Charlie Rose, Paul Ryan again dragged out the old canard that we will not discriminate against any “religion”)…. at least there was no fawning gesture to have an Imam at the Inauguration.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:04 pm

          Lesley and Adrian, I hope so.

          As for things being diluted, I assume they will be–if not his actual stance, then through obstruction. This always happens; I expect it. But if we just generally move in the right direction, I will be happy.

        • Custos Custodum says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 9:12 pm

          Ryan is a weasel, as of course, for all his would-be sophistication, is Charlie Rose.

  4. Daniel Triplett says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:03 pm

    “As I said when he said it yesterday, it isn’t possible to eradicate “radical Islamic terrorism” (which is actually orthodox and mainstream in Islam) as long as there are people who believe the Qur’an is the perfect and eternal word of Allah. There will always be some believers who get the idea that they can please Allah by killing and being killed for him (cf. Qur’an 9:111).”

    With great respect Robert, were it possible to criminalize the “practice or promotion” of Islam, making it a capital offense, with police searching for offenders, and if they even get a whiff of someone “practicing or promoting” Islam, they get hauled off to jail and prosecuted, then perhaps that would reduce the number of people willing to be Muslim. And after a while (months, maybe years), Islam would wane, and eventually cease to be a World threat.

    Of course, there will always be devout Muslims, but If it’s a crime, we reduce their ability to organize, recruit, and plan nefarious actions. Eliminating all mosques would really help.

    Granted, the Muslims are much more devout than the Nazis ever were, Muslims being willing to die for their false deity. However, the “practice or promotion” of Nazism is a crime in Germany. People walking down the street wearing a swastika shirt will get jacked up by the police. Are there still neo-Nazis? Sure. People still believe in Nazism. But when it’s a crime, we really take the wind out of their sails. Neo-nazis won’t be building nuclear weapons. Muslims won’t either if we force criminalization.

    I know about the Communications Decency Act 1996 Section 230, so I’m not asking you to respond to me here. But maybe you could write a book on what YOU see as the solution. Explaining what we must do in your expert opinion to do as President Trump wants: “Eradicate Radical Islam, ISIS, [ISLAM] from the face of the Earth.”

    I’ve bought most of your other books, and would really like to see what you see as the ultimate solution.

    • somehistory says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 6:11 pm

      The government legal experts…Trey Gowdy was a prosecutor…could exam the way the moslims set up their organizations, their centers, etc and see whether they could be labeled a *criminal enterprise.* Or, if the barracks itself is a place where conspiracy to commit a crime..such as drug smuggling, dealing, or gaining children for sexploitation, or really any crime…and then the place and the clerics that are in charge could be charged with operating a criminal enterprise. The RICO law was written to get mobsters. It has been used otherwise and it covers a whole lot of legal territory.

      cair was involved in funding terrorism back in 2007-08. It most likely is still from all of the reports that have come out since then. That is a crime. Anyone who engaged in it or talked about engaging in it, could be charged. Conspiracy only takes two people and neither one has to commit any other crime outside of the planning for them to be charged with conspiracy.

      • Bezelel says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 8:03 pm

        I read on here over a year ago that RICO should apply to islam, enforcement is about the only thing that has been missing.

        • somehistory says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 8:20 pm

          o would never have allowed them to be charged with that. That is why he always fought against any terror action being labeled as islam inspired or moslim committed.
          From what I have read about what goes on inside the barracks, and what some have written in e-mails regarding things they planned to do, or text messages such as the guys in CA used, there seems to be plenty of evidence to charge them with conspiracy and go from there.
          And all of the centers and mosques have those men who are in charge and know what, when and where. It’s pretty cut and dried if they wanted to outlaw it as a criminal enterprise. They sure rake in a lot of money off their activities and that is one of the things looked for in making the charge.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 5:22 am

        Yes, there’s more than one way to skin a cat.

        It might also be worth looking at how the British went about tackling the Thuggee cult, back in the day.

        Islam is more practised at deception, better at goodcop/badcop when ‘weak’, better at lying low…

        but the very fact that Australia had to create a “Middle Eastern Organised Crime Squad” as *soon* as our percentage of Muslims reached ‘critical mass’ in Sydney and Melbourne, surely speaks *volumes* about the nature of Islam.

        Like the mafia or other organised crime entities, not all members of the mohammedan mob are the active *enforcers* (not everyone in the mafia gets involved in the application of concrete boots) but … they all *benefit*, to some extent, from the proceeds, even if only in terms of prestige… knowing that their Gang is terrorising the dirty infidels.

        Reframe it as a crime syndicate blended with a mind-control cult, and heavily involved in slavery, drug pushing (and manufacture), welfare fraud, extortion and blackmail, and every *other* form of organised crime under the sun (which, so often, it is), then… apply our existing laws, accordingly.

        • somehistory says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:31 am

          Back in the ’60’s, the Aryan Brotherhood came to be in San Quinton prison. It was organized by two white guys to protect themselves and other whites from the gangs like the Bloods, Crips, etc. who were gangs inside and outside prison walls.

          In the ’80’s, whites in prison in other states did the same thing. Unknown to some people, they have a *religion* connected to their gang, which (gang) has been labeled a *criminal enterprise.*
          It is not against the law to *belong*, but it is against the law to engage in doing what they do. They call their meetings *church* and have the code of “blood in-blood out”…kill to get in, die to get out.

          Not all of those people who are a part of the gang are actually “members” but help, support, etc.
          If this group can be held accountable for crimes they commit, so can moslims who really practice islam as there are crimes involved.

    • Demsci says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 12:44 am

      well, counterjihadists can brainstorm and propose experiments and when these are done learn from the feedback.

      If we carefully examine Islamic texts and the interpretation and practice by hundreds of millions of Muslims we may well discover and believe that Islam teaches Muslims to break democratic laws and go against democratic values. And is n;t that then a crime?

      That then, combined with holding a person accountable for choice of religion, can be used to yes, treat Muslims differently from the rest of citizens. And risk the condemnation of “discriminating against Muslims” which so many view as “not done, unthinkable, immoral, even racist etc”.

      And how will that be translated in laws? Outlawing Islam? Or in something less severe but more feasible? Like ending Muslim immigration, asking loyalty oaths from Muslims in black and white, then extensive monitoring of Muslims and Mosques in Democratic Nations.

      we can remember the treatment by the English parliament and government of Catholics, from the time of the Armada (1588) until 1829, when the Catholics finally were “emancipated”. In that period Catholics were to be tolerated, but not to be trusted, because of their supposed supreme loyalty to a foreign power, the pope. THEY at that time were clearly discriminated against!

      • gungadin says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 3:01 am

        Demsci………I think a BIG STEP forward would be to END ALL ISLAMIC immigration…..At least going forward from that point, we’ll have only what’s HERE in this country to deal with.

        Sadly that’s more than generations of work…….BUT the longest journey starts with the smallest steps…..

        God Bless Trump

        • dumbledoresarmy says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 5:37 am

          Yes. I think that pushing to end Muslim immigration is where we must begin. Just keep hammering on the obvious – “Got Muslims? Got Jihad”.

          Probability and statistics. Risk management. And.. the saving of money. LOTS of money.

          The smaller the Muslim presence *inside* any given country, the smaller the ‘homeland security’ headache AND the law enforcement headache. And the smaller the social security bill! (given the mohammedan capacity for ‘milking’ and ‘gaming’ this system to the max, far far more than even the most egregious infidel ‘welfare cheat’; btw I am quite, quite sure that at the *other* end of the social scale, *wealthy* Mohammedans are probably up to their necks in every form of tax avoidance and other forms of rort and corrupt financial dealing known to man, again most likely more so than their infidel counterparts in business or the professions.)

          If we didn’t have any Muslims in Australia we wouldn’t *need* the “Middle Eastern Organised Crime Squad”… which is being **run off its feet**, and I am sure, at the cost of vast amounts of money and man-hours that, if they weren’t having to try to deal with the fallout of a/ Mohammedan criminal activity aimed at kuffar and b/ Mohammedan internecine gang feuding, could be devoted to *normal* law enforcement.

          To all of our elected reps, whether in the USA or anywhere else that *historically* until quite recently did not have many Muslims, but into which Muslims have migrated and are now causing ever-increasing misery and expense and disruption (all the while whining, showing off, and gaming the system), we must keep on making the point that Mr Spencer’s friend ‘Hugh Fitzgerald’ has made thusly:

          “The large-scale presence of Muslims in the countries of Western Europe has led to a situation, for the indigenous non-Muslims and for other, immigrant non-Muslims, that is far more unpleasant, expensive, and physically dangerous than would be the case without such a large-scale Muslim presence.”

          If American: find some way of shortening that, or cutting it up into bite-sized chunks – Tweet-suitable chunks – and then… Tweet it to Trump, as you beg him to STOP Musilm immigration into the USA, period.

          But it isn’t just Americans – and western Europeans – that need to make this point over and over and over, to their elected reps and to any *aspiring* politicians, and to the people around us, whenever the subject of the latest jihad attack or plot, comes up. It’s all of us infidels in all countries that, historically, until very recently, have had NO Muslims at all, or so very few that they lay low and refrained from causing too much trouble.

          It’s Aussies, Canadians, New Zealanders.. and *Fijians* (the ethnically-Indian Muslims represent a growing menace to everyone else in Fiji) – and people right across the Americas, where Muslims are more and more creeping in.

          There are countries in sub-saharan Africa where Muslims are pushing in and preparing to cause trouble.

          Everywhere, Muslim migration – the Hijra – *has* to be stopped.

          Once it’s stopped, and the sooner it’s stopped the better, then there is a short breathing space within which to move to other measures, to deal with the ones that have already got in. (And a TOTAL ban on polygyny, forced ‘marriage’ and child ‘marriage’, with massive punishments for any infractions, and strict enforcement of laws against welfare fraud, should help curb mohammedan forced-breeding , a bit; *real* protection for apostates would also help).

        • Demsci says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 9:20 am

          Yes, I completely agree with you and DDA.

          However, for that which you propose to be implemented, there has got to be “Discrimination on grounds of choice of religion”, a HUGE TABOO at this time, among people from the left to the right on the street and of politics.

          so to them it is either letting immigrate people from ALL religions or lack thereof, or no immigration at all, or immigration based on other criteria.

          The first political step for what you propose therefore seems to be make a good case of reasons why to DISCRIMINATE AGAINST MUSLIMS ON GROUNDS OF THEIR CHOICE OF RELIGION. And in the process define precisely where this discrimination is allowed and where not, and how far governments, city councils, police, military, civil servants may go with this.

          for this discrimination to be legal and doable we need a majority of the citizens or in parliament. This was impossible, unthinkable a short while ago. And it is still soooooo difficult nowadays, but there is a “big change in the air”” now, we sense.

        • Custos Custodum says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 9:31 pm

          It is true that discrimination against Muslims based on their choice of religion is a POLITICAL problem across a broad swath of the political spectrum among unsophisticated consumers of politics.

          There are, however, two plausible and legally workable shortcuts:

          (1) Ordinary Americans must be reminded that – notwithstanding decades of propaganda slyly implying the opposite – foreigners outside the U.S. have NO human rights under the U.S. constitution for purposes of immigration to the U.S.

          (2) The U.S. government can designate countries that are considered risky as sources of immigration by reference to objective criteria, e.g.:

          (a) crime rates among recent immigrants from those countries to the U.S.,
          (b) availability of alternative destinations for refugees/migrants from those countries,
          (c) education level of refugees/migrants as independently verified by U.S. testing institutions.

          Reasonable knowledge of English may also be a useful discriminating factor, but this needs to be handled with care given that some populous Muslim countries such as Pakistan and Bangladesh were part of British India.

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 3:35 pm

      You guys made some excellent inputs on here. Lots of good, specific detailed ideas for solutions.

      I hadn’t thought of RICO. RICO does include terrorism, among many other crimes.

      Trey Gowdy is one of my heroes. I wanted him to be AG. But he’d be the perfect legislator to place in charge of this project to persuade the House to criminalize Islam, and articulate why.

      I read that 80% of US mosques preach the standard Orthodox violent Islam, just as required by Allah. The other 20% are just better at hiding it. The mosques and madrasas all qualify as meeting places to conspire crime. They should all be secretly monitored, to develop a list of conspirators, then the edifices should be razed to the ground: Not converted to anything. No place that has worshiped Satan ought to be allowed to stand.

      We all know Islam is just a criminal enterprise dressed up as a religion. In examining the Koran, Sira, and Hadith, we can find at least 50 serious felonies that are preached in the “instruction manuals” for all Muslims. In addition to the RICO violations, I’d think Sedition and Conspiracy to Commit Genocide are right at the top of a long list of very serious felonies.

      We’re certainly not required to tolerate this just because a 7th Century psychopath said so. It’s completely undeserving of any Constitutional protections. In fact, applying the Constitution to it is like shining a black light on a blood splattered room, revealing how truly criminal Islam is.

      No one could start Islam today. Were Muhammad alive now, he’d be sitting in a small cell on Death Row in a SuperMax.

      It’s funny, but it’s not, but if we removed the binders from the Islamic source texts and spread out all the pages on a table, any FBI agent would obviously see the 50+ felonies. Our Capitol Hill Legislators and President Trump would see them too. But when we put the binders back on all those pages, assembling them into books called Koran, Sira, and Hadith, they’re magically transformed from felony crimes back into “religious doctrine,” becoming something we’re all required to respect, tolerate, and place under the protective umbrella of our Constitution.

      This is the craziness that must end ASAP. Every Muslim is a criminal. We don’t even need to pass more laws. The laws are already there. We just need an acknowledgment from the President and AG, then start enforcing the laws, secretly gathering Intel from mosques/madrasas on names of conspirators and whom to arrest, prosecute, and execute, then bulldoze all those demonic buildings to the ground.

      Although, to make this enormous endeavor easier for domestic enforcement and the terms of surrender we force on Dar al-Islam governments, instead of sorting out all the 50+ felonies, and trying to determine whom is guilty of what, we should just create a new law that says “practicing or promoting Islam is a capital offense.” This would simplify enforcement and adjudication, without having to determine which guy committed which of the 50+ felonies. Practicing or promoting ANYTHING included in the three Islamic source texts would be a Federal Felony, punishable by death. This is what we must force every Muslim sovereignty to do as well.

      But perhaps a brief period of Amnesty would be in order, giving Muslims involved only in the conspiracy, and never acting on it the opportunity to apostatize. A period not to exceed one month, or perhaps less. Arrest and charge them first, then offer them the conditional Amnesty or death.

      We can’t immediately round up and execute all persons who’ve ever attended mosque. That would be like genocide, hence the brief period of Amnesty. So, the difficult part will be developing a Taqiyya-proof method of determining the veracity of each Muslim’s Declaration of Apostasy. This will be a great challenge, and I don’t pretend to have the answer. Perhaps to seek such answers, we should have experts like Robert consult with Imams who’ve previously apostatized. These apostate clerics/caliphs would know how and what to ask to determine the truth.

      During the Spanish Inquisition, when Monarchs Ferdinand and Isabella tried expelling every Muslim from their kingdom, the Muslims tried blending in by pretending to be Catholic, all sanctioned under Islamic law for them, because their lives were in jeopardy. So, if they kept Allah in their hearts, they could use any lie they deemed necessary to shield them from peril.

      This was all happening over 500 years ago.

      They’ve had all that additional time to develop their trade-craft of lies and deception, so this won’t be easy. “Extreme vetting,” as our President says, to sort out bad Muslims from good is but a fantasy I’m afraid. Apostasy or death must be the choice during the brief Amnesty period, and we ought to have our best Kaffir experts in Islam, like Robert, consult with longtime Imam Apostates to determine a fail-safe method of determining the sincerity of Declared Apostasy. “Longtime Imam Apostates,” and not just some guys who figured out how to game the system during the brief Amnesty period.

  5. cluck james says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:07 pm

    Dear Robert

    I wish Donald Trump reads your blog. I wish you were one of his advisors. Can’t you see if you can influence him to force Islam to reform?

    A threat of nuclear raidation, Mecca medina, will do that trick.

    • cs says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 6:30 pm

      True, but his chief adviser, Steve Bannon, is very familiar with Islam, he is very close to David Horowitz and Pamela Geller, who are both close to Robert, so I am sure he gets it.

      • Demsci says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 12:47 am

        That is great to hear and contemplate! Thanks for the information and the thought.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 10:45 pm

      I don’t think threatening to nuke Mecca would get Muslims to reform–not in the least.

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:35 am

        Agreed.

        War is a Battle of Wills. The side which loses the Will to Fight first loses the war. So, the objective is to “Break their Will to Fight,” not increase it.

        I have a feeling watching their Kaaba get nuked would piss them off royally, increasing their Will to Fight, not reducing it, and by the next day we’d watch tractor-trailers mowing down Kaffir Worldwide.

        In much the same way we’d feel if the Vatican, St. Paul’s Cathedral, Westminster Abbey, St. Patrick’s Cathedral, or the US National Cathedral were attacked, to include symbols of pride like the Statue of Liberty or Twin Towers, attacking these targets would be a grave error in strategy on the part of the Ummah. 9/11 infuriated us, versus scaring us as the Ummah had hoped. Likewise, we must select our targets carefully too.

        First step is to target their capacity to counter-attack with nukes. That means on Day One, nuking the N Korean and Pakistani nuke arsenals, along with the Iranian nuke production facilities. For good measure to show we’re not screwing around, Raqqa would be a great target for the first day too.

        As our grandfathers knew well, major wars between civilizations can’t be won without breaking the Will to Fight of the civilian population. We essentially razed to the ground every German and Japanese large city, bombing every man, woman, and child in sight. We wouldn’t have won the war if we didn’t.

        By the time August 1945 arrived, our Manhattan Project strategic planners wanted to use the new Atomic Bomb on a target city never previously attacked, so we could accurately assess the damage potential of this new weapon with post-attack Battle Damage Assessment photos. There were only a handful of medium to large cities left from which to choose. We had already leveled about 66 major Japanese cities.

        The primary reason for using the A-Bomb on Japan was for the safety of American Forces. For the same reason, we should use nuclear weapons now. During WWII, we famously launched bombing raids with formations of 1000 airplanes just to target 1 city. Many aircrews wouldn’t return, especially in Europe.

        Today, we can use one standoff nuke missile at a fraction of the cost, to meet the same objective as 1000 airplanes using conventional bombs. So, what’s the difference really? Why shed Allied blood when it’s totally unnecessary? A nuke strike is arguably more humane than TNT bombs or incendiaries anyway because death is instant.

        An effective method to break the enemy’s Will to Fight is to scare them. Nothing scares people more than getting nuked. But nuclear weapons don’t scare anyone unless we show we have the will to use them occasionally. Furthermore, watching ammo dumps and munitions factories get bombed scares no one. Watching your neighboring cities get glassed and worrying about the safety of your own family does.

        That’s why I believe incremental random Strategic Area Bombing is the answer. “Incremental” (i.e. 1 strike every 72 hours) to minimize enemy damage and casualties, giving them an opportunity to rethink their loyalties to Allah. And “random,” such that every Muslim in Dar al-Islam believes he and his family could be next.

        The pressure the population puts on their governments to comply with Allied terms would be overwhelming. The fear would be immense. The refugee crises would be unprecedented, and of course we’d shut the doors on al-hijrah, not allowing any of them inside Dar al-Harb.

        I don’t think this type of campaign would take long at all. It’s the fastest, least expensive strategy. It would also mean near zero Allied casualties, and minimize Ummah casualties.

        The objective is not to “Nation Build” the World, but to force Dar al-Islam governments to criminalize Islam themselves.

        Lesson learned from the first Gulf War: Don’t disband the enemy’s government, police, and military. Leave their infrastructure intact, inasmuch as possible, destroying it just enough, and killing just enough of them to force their surrender to our will. Not one soul more. If the government doesn’t resist at all, we wouldn’t target any of their territory. For Muslim sovereignties who resist, they watch their cities get vaped one at a time until they no longer resist. Then we replace the executive leadership with Apostate native leaders of our liking, but leave the bulk of the bureaucracy in place.

        The strategy I propose is nothing new. As I’ve said before, the US Military teaches this strategy to all Majors and above. What I’m proposing is essentially an identical strategy we used to defeat Japan, minus the bloody island hopping and staggering casualties on both sides.

        The strategy works, which is why we still teach it.

        The only difference today, versus 75 years ago, is that we can fight the campaign from Start to Finish in several months, instead of 3 1/2 years, due to the advances in weaponry we have at our disposal.

        As I’ve said before, Trinity the first atomic weapon test, was on 16JUL1945. The Hiroshima strike was less than 3 weeks later on 6 August. If our grandfathers had atomic weapons on 7DEC1941, would they have sacrificed 407,300 of our finest, bravest Americans, and waited 3 1/2 years before using them? Of course not. They weren’t stupid. They, like we, must use the most efficient weapons available to get the whole mess over with as early as possible. War isn’t pretty. This Islamic War is a zero-sum conflict for all the marbles.

        This whole business coming from the Ohammad Administration about waging war with zero civilian casualties and no collateral damage is total non-sense that would only ever be advocated by a civilian leader untrained in warfare, or a traitor. Obama is both.

        WWIII can and should be fought from a cubicle dug into the bottom of a Wyoming mountain. There’s no reason for us to lose one Allied serviceman’s life.

        https://medium.com/@dantriplett/islamic-jihad-is-total-war-for-all-marbles-6c858098b76e#.y343lc6ij

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:20 pm

          Daniel, I’m not saying we shouldn’t target Mecca because it would piss Muslims off–just that I don’t believe it would end Islam, as some others appear to think.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 11:15 pm

          Agreed. It wouldn’t end Islam.

          I simply offered an explanation of how it would possibly expand Islam. At least that’s what I was trying to do.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 5:42 pm

          Thanks for your reply, Daniel. I’m not sure it would expand Islam–one already has to be attracted to that foul creed–but it would not end it.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 7:48 am

          Excellent point gravenimage. I fully agree.

          My articulation was poor, and yours is excellent, which makes mine look even worse.

          Blowing up the Kaaba isn’t going to convert a Christian to a Muslim. If you inferred that, the mistake was mine.

          Perhaps you’ll agree though, and what I was trying to say, is that watching the Kaaba be blown-up might be enough to make a less devout Muslim more fully devout. That’s what I was trying to say.

  6. common sense says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:10 pm

    Too bad Muslim Imams were allowed to preach “diversity” this morning at the traditionally held church service for the new POTUS and vice POTUS. I hope they told him that Trump could not do something, that way he’ll do the opposite as usual and shove it in their face. Those feckwads should not even be allowed in a church of our praceful Lord Jesus Christ.

    BTW- ISLAM is the most illegitimate so called religion on the planet not our President.

    • Kiel says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 5:14 pm

      You are right, it’s even not the same god. These muzzies always freak me out.

    • Alexius Comnenus says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 6:25 pm

      Amen.

  7. Kiel says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:10 pm

    Triumphant Trump! Amazing president, and a grown up man. Thank you, Mr. President, for leading this country.

    • Alexius Comnenus says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 6:25 pm

      I agree with you. Your are a true American.

  8. davej says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:19 pm

    Wow. As much as I support Trump’s patriotism and more realistic take on Islam, that was one of the most disjointed, rambling and narcissistic speeches I have ever heard.

    Perhaps he was just over-fatigued but if I didn’t know better I’d say he was on drugs.

    • Don McKellar says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:34 pm

      SILENCE, conman. It was classic Trump. Big laughs from the audience, five minute standing and cheering ovations. The rank and file of the intelligence community are now Trump’s biggest supporters.

      • davej says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 9:34 pm

        @Don: your “Silence Conman” retorts are a little harsh. Most of us here respect free speech and share both our disgust with Islam and our support of Trump’s honest intent to deal with it.

        I thought his inauguration speech was pretty good, especially the “eliminating from the surface of the earth” part. I want him to have good relations with and the support of the intelligence community, if he has that I’m happy.

        Nevertheless, IMO, this particular 16 minutes was meandering, off target and self-serving to the extreme. Maybe I’m wrong – others seem to think it was OK. I watched it with CC on and thought it was an embarrassing train wreck. I’m hoping that he was just a little frazzled from the inaugurating and dancing late into the night with that good looking Melania gal…

        Just remember that calling for the silencing of other opinions is kind of, well, um, Islamic.

        I’d like to think that all honest comments are welcome here, except maybe that weird Ibby guy.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 10:49 pm

          Many of us have noted that Trump is *far* from perfect, including in his grasp of the Islamic threat. Just having someone in office who actually loves America and is willing to say that Jihad is evil is a step in the right direction, though.

          I think we would be mistaken if we expect a completely coherent plan to fight Jihad, though. I am *not* being negative here–just realistic.

        • Oliver says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 10:59 pm

          The quote perfect candidate end quote. Or leader does not exist. They are human.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 9:47 am

          @gravenimage

          War plans take time to produce. That’s why the Pentagon has a whole library of ready-to-go, off the shelf war plans for just about any scenario.

          He’s been President for just a day and a half. I’m confident he’ll eventually find the plan that works. And if you want to help steer him in the right direction, he does read his Twitter account. You can reach him there. He doesn’t Email at all, but he’s addicted to Twitter. If you need more than 140 characters, write an unlimited length essay on medium.com, then link it to your Twitter post. That’s what I do.

          All that said, the best laid war plans become just a general guide as soon as the action starts, because there’s no way to predict exactly what problems we’ll encounter, or what the enemy will do.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:23 pm

          Thanks, Daniel. I agree.

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 9:37 am

      President Trump is a bazillionaire who speaks and thinks like the rest of us. He’s the same on camera as he is off camera. He’s genuine. Nothing phony about him. That’s what most of us like about him.

      He’s plain spoken, and his delivery was not much different than if you or I were to deliver it, except he has a lot more charisma and confidence. I much prefer that than watching Obama stare down his arrogant nose at the peasants during his speeches. A phony fool who can’t give a three minute speech to a class of second graders without a teleprompter (no kidding, I watched him do it).

  9. Oliver says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:20 pm

    And, I am sure that Mr. T-as Sec. Of State will NOT use a private server for his emails and have the names and locations of agents in his emails.

    Good start.

    Now clean out the corrupt slime in the ENTIRE intelligence community. Both Muslims and fellow travelers.
    A shame cannot do so in Congress as well. (As an aside- AS PER THE WALL STREET JOURNAL- IN A VIDEO ABOUT POLITICS–NANCY PELOSI HAD A SIGN OUTSIDE HER OFFICE. LET’S MAKE AMERICA SICK AGAIN.

    (Then she took it down- when thought (?) it might upset people.

  10. cs says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:48 pm

    Dear friends, I hope Trump don’t fxck up with the CIA, or he is a dead man, the same that happen to JFK, Robert Kennedy, may happen to him, so he must be careful there, and don’t stretch himself too much, otherwise it is a liability.
    Mazal Tov to him.

    • cs says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 5:49 pm

      typo: the same thing that happened to JFK*

    • Wellington says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 6:50 pm

      The CIA had NOTHING to do with JFK’s assassination. Neither did the KGB, the Mafia, Castro, the Federal Reserve, et al. JFK was killed by a lone loser who happened to be a very good marksman (Oswald received the second highest award for marksmanship when he was in the Marines and any Marine is an above average shot). All the conspiracies theories about JFK’s assassination are loon material. If you doubt me, then read Gerald Posner’s CASE CLOSED, which demolishes one conspiracy theory after another and demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK with no help from anyone. It is a tome of over 500 pages and replete with many, many details but, as very significant historians and journalists like Stephen Ambrose and Tom Wicker noted, there is no way you can read this book from cover to cover and conclude anything but that Lee Harvey Oswald, and he alone, killed the 35th President of the United States.

      The reason why I responded to your post is that in the battle against Islamic supremacism and other battles like getting rid of fools in the federal government (e.g., John Brennan), there is no room for error, especially error proffered by fallacious conspiracy theorists, who will only have the effect of discrediting legitimate causes by putting forth nonsense as truth. Accuracy is imperative for good to survive. False conspiracy theories hinder this noble quest. :Learn this.

      • billybob says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 6:58 am

        So why was Lee Harvey Oswald killed by a supposed patriot, Jack Ruby at the earliest opportunity, and how did such an opportunity arise in the first place?

        I remember that clearly. I was there, watching it on black and white TV during the six o’clock news on the day it happened. He was killed to silence him.

        Jack Ruby was a criminal low life who began with a troubled childhood and adolescence, marked by juvenile delinquency and time spent in foster homes. Ruby later went on to manage various nightclubs, strip clubs, and dance halls. Ruby developed close ties to many Dallas Police officers who frequented his nightclubs, where he provided them with free liquor, prostitutes and other favors. You can read much more about him on Wikipedia. This guy was hardly a “patriot”, so what was his real motive?

        • Kepha says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 9:08 am

          I would be the first to say that the killing of Lee Harvey Oswald, before he had a chance to really talk, looks pretty fishy on the surface. However, given Oswald’s Communist ties, and what I know of both the FBI and CIA, my guess is that those two agencies would’ve been the last to want Oswald dead. Rather, they would’ve liked to have him somewhere safe (maximum security prison) where they could access him to pump him for information about possible Soviet and Cuban support for revolutionary terrorism in the USA. Indeed, I strongly suspect that had Ruby not killed Oswald, the FBI and CIA would’ve worked behind scenes to plea deal to have Oswald sentenced to life imprisonment rather than death–or, failing to impress a Texas jury, they would’ve worked behind scenes to keep Oswald from his appointment with the electric chair long enough to pump him dry of the information they might want.

          While Jack Ruby was a lowlife with ties to the mob–and the Kennedy clan’s patriarch was old friends with the mob–I doubt that the Mafia would’ve wanted a high profile “payback” killing of Kennedy’s assassin, lest consequent interrogations of Ruby expose some of their own dealings, and possibly compromise some of their own allies in positions of power. Organized crime actually likes things quiet, or at least below radar. It’s high-profile killings (as opposed to foot solders in a tiff over turf) are usually for the enforcement of the underworld power structure, unwritten rules, and other things that keep the underworld running at a relative equilibrium.

          Jack Ruby was a loose cannon who thought he could give himself fifteen minutes of fame; possibly make himself a folk hero (“Son of impoverished immigrants wreaks vengeance on Commie scum assassin!” or something like that). Yes, he probably did see himself as a patriot–as many other lowlifes have before him (and I do not mean to impugn all patriots as scoundrels, even if some scoundrels turn themselves into patriots).

          A last point: Had Oswald missed his bus, or had some other employee in the textbook depository found his cached rifle and reported it, or some other similar turn of the screw, and Kennedy had lived, he would’ve been the politician whom the Silly ‘Sixties would’ve brought low, and his brothers with him. His supposed “martyrdom” made him into a legend.

          For the life of me, I do not think the assassination of JFK was a good thing, and I would never advocate political assassination (I love the peaceful transfer of power too much).

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 7:24 pm

          Yes–I think Jack Ruby thought much of the country would be impressed with his taking out Oswald–of course, most people didn’t condone any such thing. Ruby would not become the folk hero he had hoped. One can abhor what Oswald did–I certainly do–without wanting to see him assassinated, either. It is more my love of democracy and the rule of law than the individuals in question.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 10:52 pm

      The idea that the CIA had Kennedy killed is just malicious bosh.

      • Kepha says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 9:10 am

        I agree completely.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:36 pm

          🙂

  11. Angemon says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:53 pm

    This is evil. This is evil….This is a level of evil that we haven’t seen.

    What has ISIS done that hasn’t been done before in history by equally devout muslims?

    • eur says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 6:01 pm

      I was going to write exactly the same thing. Muslims in Europe (Spain, Greece, Serbia, etc.) did exactly as Isis does. In Africa with the slave markets … is that Islam has always been like that.

      • no_one says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 6:09 pm

        I agree. Why do politicians and many people refuse to learn from history.

        • roger woodhouse says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 4:40 am

          Untill we elect leaders who are prepared to ackn owledge the threat we face from islam nothing will be achieved.That is the first step to be taken before anything else.The spoken word is only the beginning.With the electing of President Trump I pray that the process is now underway hopefully followed here in Britain.I fear though we here in Europe have got to suffer many more deaths before this will happen .Our pathetic leaders are still very much in a state of denial (and ignorance) re.that so called religion .The leftwing media still controls the narrative here with the BBC leading the pack.Only the success of Donald Trump can offer any us hope .Islam has to be removed from the West hopefully peacefully but I fear violently because of our total lack of conviction when it mattered.

    • Alien Republican says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:13 pm

      “What has ISIS done that hasn’t been done before in history by equally devout muslims?”
      —
      Actually there are still things ISIS hasn’t done yet as far as I’m aware of. Flayling alive like the Venetian Marcantonio Bragadin or impaling on a grand scale by the Ottomans.

      • eur says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 2:23 am

        Now the Muslims are in Italy, I do not know what else can happen to insult the memory of Bragadin … unearth the skin of the Venetian and eat it?
        Maybe they think he was murdered in the halal style. The Muslims do not study history, they teach them a sweet story where they are the conquerors who follow the chivalric rules and the infidels were barbarians. Never admit that Islamic history is full of robberies, murders, conquests, rapes, profanations, slavery … they always speak of self-defense …. that is because Islam has always considered that if someone resists then it is a statement of War so is not considered innocent.
        To this day the Muslims who have come from North Africa to Europe are undocumented people who truly believe that their civilization is peaceful … but superior to any other. They truly believe that they have to Islamize Europe, the different European cultures do not care.
        It is true that they often play with the local nationalists, they show that their children learn the language of the region to the satisfaction of the nationalists … but it is all so evident …. they do not participate in any local tradition and if they can forbid them in The neighborhoods where they are majority.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 10:38 pm

          Muslims know how violent Islamic history is–they just don’t admit it to the “filthy Infidels” unless they are in full power.

    • Wellington says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:18 pm

      You are of course correct, Angemon, and this points out a deficiency about Trump, to wit, that while he is highly intelligent and has great street instincts (e.g., his saying last March that “I think Islam hates us”) he does not have enough pure knowledge. Understand, he is light years ahead of his predecessor, as I’m sure you will agree, but he doesn’t know as much as he should know. Let’s just hope that what the great historian, Paul Johnson, said about Harry Truman can eventually also be said about Donald Trump, i.e., he was ignorant but he learned fast.

      • Kepha says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 7:47 pm

        In fact, Harry S. Truman was a fairly avid reader of history, both American and other.

        But I agree that Trump is probably a fast learner. You can’t survive in the business world if you’re not one.

      • PRCS says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 9:20 pm

        “Understand, he is light years ahead of his predecessor, as I’m sure you will agree”

        Based upon the things he’s said about Islam, I don’t believe for a moment that Barry O is ignorant about Islam.But I do agree that our new president needs to get up to speed on the subject ASAP–if not sooner.

        A few things he could do:

        Drop the radical modifier.
        Better yet, say Muslim terrorists instead of Islamic terrorism.
        Make it clear the 1st amendment does not license “religious” acts which violate U.S. law.
        Read a few passages (like 5:38), in public, from the Qur’an that CAIR gives out and ask “our” Muslims to denounce them

        I imagine others here have many additional suggestions.

        • Wellington says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 10:49 pm

          One, PRCS, can be quite knowledgeable about a subject but still be very much behind the eight ball.

          Put another way, I have never said here at JW that Obama was ignorant of Islam, only that he was ignorant overall. After all, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and members of CAIR are not ignorant of Islam but they are still ignoramuses, now aren’t they?

        • Demsci says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 1:00 am

          For a president or a member of the government or press secretary of the white house to read a few abominable damning actual quotes from Quran or Hadiths, wouldn’t that be great, in today’s context, stunning even!!!

          Obama and other VIPs read Islamic texts with the intention to whitewash Islam. And in the process they lied, both about it’s real meaning and about giving the impression it was like all of Islam’s teaching, that is, in their propaganda, peaceful etc.

          But for a president, press secretary of the White house, to do the opposite and discredit Islam, wow, can that happen?

          And, such people are both well protected and influential.

        • PRCS says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 2:05 am

          Re: One….no doubt.

          Don’t know if ignoramus is the right description–for this discussion–but if so, it seems to be working pretty well for the boys at CAIR.

          Put another way, I can’t say–though I wish I could–that they’re behind the eight ball.

          And hope that will change.

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:33 am

        I think Robert will have President Trump’s ear via the Pamela Geller – Steve Bannon connection.

        As I’ve said, Robert needs a window office in the West Wing.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:50 pm

        Good post, Wellington.

    • Don McKellar says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:29 pm

      In the modern era. In our lifetimes we have not been witness to honest Islam as we have now. That’s what Trump was saying.

    • Terry says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:44 pm

      I don’t know. Did Muslims in the past put people in cages then burn them alive? Have children-LITTLE CHILDREN- WELL BELOW PUBERTY- kill people? Strap young children with bombs?

      Yes, many of these were done before, both by Muslims, Viet Cong, North Koreans, etc. But, IF I HAD TO TAKE A GUESS, WHAT PRES. TRUMP IS GETTING AT–ON THE SCALE-OF ALL COMBINED- NEVER BEEN DONE.

      • Wellington says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 9:19 pm

        Mohammed, Terry, had a man, Kinana, burned alive for not revealing where a certain amount of treasure was (see Ibn Ishaq’s biography of Mo for confirmation here). Mohammed also had a woman (Asma bint Marwan), while breast-feeding her baby, killed for the great crime of criticizing him (the 100 year old poet Abu Afak too for “this great crime”). He additionally had some 600 men from the Banu Qurayza tribe beheaded in just one day (that’s a lot of severed heads). Mohammed said, “He who changes his Islamic faith, kill him.” {Bukhari Hadith 9:84:57}

        The rot starts with Mohammed and that is why I have said before that if you destroy Mohammed, you destroy Islam. I mean just look at yet another monstrous instructive proffered by this seventh-century psychopath by way of his saying: “I have been made victorious with terror.” {Bukhari Hadith 4:52:220} Yes, he surely was, but no such person has any business founding a major religion which, to the great detriment of mankind, he successfully did.

        Mohammed is the key to the eradication of the worst religion ever developed by man. Oh, and as for children—not killing themselves but in another way being abused—Mohammed, when in his fifties, had sexual intercourse with nine-year old Aisha. I trust you get my overall drift here.

        • Westman says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 2:58 am

          And torture for booty still goes on: “But there was no treasure. Most artifacts had been moved out of Palmyra as ISIS approached. The group stands accused of rampant looting and smuggling, and Abdel Karim thinks they were angry Asaad didn’t answer their questions. They beheaded him in front of dozens of people, then displayed his corpse with a sign accusing him of being a supporter of the Syrian regime.” http://www.npr.org/2015/08/19/432910251/prominent-syrian-archaeologist-killed-by-isis-in-palmyra

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 11:00 pm

          Yes–this savagery goes back to the beginning of Islam.

          The West had succeeded in taming some of the very worst excesses of Islam over the past couple of centuries in some places–but over the past few decades, Islam has been resurgent.

          But if you want to see just how savage Islam can be, just read the horrific accounts of the Armenian Genocide, which are as bad as anything going on in the Islamic State today.

    • vlparker says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 10:38 pm

      Nothing. But Trump is learning. He has come a long way from the Donald Trump who criticized Pamela Geller for holding the draw Mohammad contest. Hopefully, his education in islam will continue and he will quit saying the redundant ‘radical islam’. Time will tell.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 11:01 pm

      This is true, Angemon–but it is definitely the nastiest expression of pure Islam we have seen in modern times–even more horrifying than the Taliban when they were in power. I’m willing to cut Trump some slack here.

      • somehistory says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 12:01 am

        When a person enters a class on anti-terrorism for the first time, there is much to learn…and unlearn. It doesn’t all click the very first day, nor even the second. It takes a little time to learn the different forms and causes, etc.

        If he is sincere, he will learn as anyone here has learned. No one is born knowing just how evil islam is. And the true nature and scope may bring a shock or two to the one just having his eyes opened to it.

        • dumbledoresarmy says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 6:01 am

          I hope that his Czech connections are admirers of one Milos Zeman, a former Prime Minister of the Czech republic (served 1996-2002)

          *This* is what Mr Zeman had to say about *Islam*: about the Ummah, back in 2011.

          At a conference held in June 2011, Mr Zeman said *this*:

          “The enemy is the anti-civilization spreading from North Africa to Indonesia. Two billion people live in it and it is financed partly from oil sales and partly from drug sales,” Czech news servers quoted Zeman as saying about Islam at the recent conference. ”

          And there’s more! –
          “Zeman said on Thursday that Muslims believe in the Qur’an like Nazis believed in racial supremacy and anti-Semitism and communists in class struggle and dictatorship of the proletariat.

          “He continued to say that Islam is far more aggressive and intolerant than present Christianity, Buddhism, Confucianism and other world religions.

          “He added that the Qur’an includes passages calling for the subjugation, enslavement and even elimination of non-believers.” END QUOTE

          Upon which, of course, all the usual suspects went into paroxysms of horror and rage; but it is and was ALL TRUE.

          Perhaps Mr Trump (or one of his staffers) should have a nice phonecall with Mr Zeman. Or even …maybe Mr Trump in time to come should do a visit to Europe, and *visit* the Czech Republic (after all he has two half-Czech american children) and *meet* with Mr Zeman.

          Mr Zeman was uncowed by the tantrums of the Muslims and the Islamophiles, for in 2014, he essentially told the OiC to go boil their heads. (Now, wouldn’t it be refreshing if, after a period of time within which he quietly ‘got his ducks in a row’, so to speak, President Donald Trump were to do similar?)

          http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/54482

          “On the occasion of Israel’s Independence Day, the Czech Republic President, Milos Zeman, gave a speech at the Israel Embassy in Prague.

          “It was stunning in its clarity regarding Islamic hateful doctrine towards Jews and by inference Christians and virtually all unbelievers and apostates….

          “They [Zeman’s remarks in that speech] have since generated an acrimonious and courageous exchange with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) who alleged that Zeman had committed blasphemy by accusing Islam of not being a religion of peace and tolerance. Anything but. …”.

          The Muslims demanded an apology.

          Mr Zeman came right back at them:

          “President Miloš Zeman is not going to apologize for his statements in which he linked Islamic ideology with violence. His words were conveyed by his spokesperson Jiří Ovčáček: “President Zeman definitely does not intend to apologize. For the president would consider it blasphemy to apologize for the quotation of a sacred Islamic text.”

          Oh, nice one.

          (Said text being one of the nastiest in the Islamic canon, and cited by Mr Zeman to demonstrate the continuity between observed mohammedan atrocious conduct, and the instructions in the founding texts of Islam..).

          To which the OIC reps had no reply.

          And yet more, from the Czechs. Mr Zeman isn’t the only clear-headed Czech politician. I’d love to know whether Mr Trump’s Czech in-laws share what seems to be a fairly common Czech clarity of perception.

          http://www.newenglishreview.org/blog_direct_link.cfm/blog_id/65023

          Here is just one paragraph from Samkova’s corker of a speech (and note the absence of mealymouthed qualifiers; she speaks simply of ISLAM, as such).

          “…Unfortunately, Islam doesn’t want to be miserable on its own. It wants to take the rest of the world down with it.
          Islam doesn’t respect development, progress, and humanity. In its despair, it is attempting to take the rest of the mankind with it because from the Islamic viewpoint, the rest of the world is futile, useless, and unclean…”.

          All completely true, and demonstrable from the texts and from all the work of erudite non-Muslims who have patiently waded through the swamp of mohammedan texts in the original languages, and through the rivers of blood and piles of skulls and smoking ruins left behind by Islam in the historical record.

  12. no_one says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 6:11 pm

    Trump promised to repeal Obamacare and what he signed yesterday does absolutely nothing. I hope he is not just talk about islam.

    • Don McKellar says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:32 pm

      SILENCE, conman. He did exactly as he said he would: signed legislation to start the process. Score one for Trump.

      • no_one says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 2:07 am

        Shut up. You are the conman. I have to deal with the Obama sh*t. And stop yelling at me like an idiot. You are not an American. Why do you care? I am joining the next anti-Trump protest.

        • John C. Barile says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 6:51 pm

          I hate the Affordable Care Act, too. I’m happy that I don’t have to incur a penalty for not having it. I thank President Trump for that. What I hate most about the ACA–Obamacare–is that it dictates what kind of policy I must have, and what it must prescribe for me, whether or not I need it or choose it.

          Our President has done his part, acting with the authority he has–but it is the U.S. Congress that must present him a bill to repeal it, as it was Congress who enacted it to begin with.

  13. underbed cat says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 6:13 pm

    Can somebody who tweets…explain to Trump the roots of terrorism, jihad, and the religion of peace….just exposing the doctrine would do more than warfare, there has to be information first and understanding of their warfare before engaging to stop the violence. There is a doctrine which all of the many terror groups use…that is the problem.

    Or maybe he knows…just a little nervous.

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 10:44 am

      Steve Bannon, Pamela Geller, and Robert Spencer will give him the 411.

      That doesn’t stop the rest of America from informing him too though. Use Twitter and medium.com. President Trump never Emails. Strange. Bill Clinton has never written an Email either. And Bush 43 didn’t have a cellphone.

  14. Alexius Comnenus says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 6:30 pm

    America has voted for Donald J.Trump. He is the lawful President of the United States, because we the people voted for him and put him there for a reason. He knows that and that’s the reason he spoken boldly and straight just a feet away from the ex POTUS who brought America to a moral degradation, a pro islamic administration for eight years, has created the international chaos, and destroyed the economy and tried his best to prove atheism at all level.
    Trump speech has shown to the whole world what we the people of America desire.

  15. kessler says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 6:34 pm

    Hopefully Trump already know the connection between what we refer to as “extremist” islam and orthodox islam. But given the insane amount of hate, smear and threats he is receiving at this point, perhaps it’s a good idea to keep some things under the lid for now.
    I am just so happy and relieved that a president with guts and intellect to call out Islam is in charge.
    I hope Europe will follow as we need it more than ever.

    • eur says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 2:43 am

      Nop, Europe is doomed.
      Here in Europe politicians, media … speak of Islam as if it is another religion. They will never admit that it is an incompatible civilization, Muslims are creating political parties … do you imagine Buddhist political parties? As long as Muslims create their religious political structures citizens who see what is happening we can not do anything. We see how our cities are transformed, as it was possible to walk at night and now it is impossible …. it is all terrible. Their political parties talk about restoring moral values ​​… it’s incredible.

      • gungadin says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 3:21 am

        eur………that’s why Trump MUST halt ALL immigration from Europe and beyond……at least until there is a way to better VETT all those who apply for entry into the US .

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:49 am

        Europe is headed for Civil War. Too many enemy inside the tent already.

        The Germans must remove Merkel NOW. No time for elections. Martial Law would be a great solution. Get the top General to turn on her. She’s powerless without the military.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:06 pm

        Don’t give up, eur.

      • Custos Custodum says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:21 pm

        Note that the Muslim invasion of Europe happened to coincide with the administration of America’s first Muslim president, Barry Obama.

        Obama apparently spent a year in Pakistan while at college. The Saudis spent a fortune to have Barry’s actual background wiped clean and/or prettied up.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 7:29 pm

          Oh, it had started much before Obama–and the atrocities of the Madrid Train Bombing and the London Tube Bombing predate him, as well. But things have gotten *much worse* there in the past eight years.

  16. marina says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 6:40 pm

    @Daniel Triplett , he said criminalize the “practice or promotion” of Islam, making it a capital offense”. It would be a big problem with the so called moderate muslims also not only the extremists. Some of these are cultural muslims only, don’t pray or go to mosque or would really harm anybody. They have no idea that koran contains violent verses. But any mention of the negative aspects of islam makes them offensive. It doesn’t matter that we are talking about wiping out radical islam. They think the rest of the world is at war with them. They think “Muslim Ummah” should always stick together.

    Pres Trump will have a real challenge in front of him

    • PRCS says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 9:36 pm

      A few thoughts.

      The “extremists” you refer to are the best Muslims; trying their best to comply with Islam’s every command, demand, and expectation.

      Unless there are data to validate your claim, the idea that cultural Muslims don’t know what Qur’an says si speculative.

      The term “radical Islam” gives the false impression that a “moderate” version exists.

      But, you are correct in noting that President Trump has a real challenge in front of him.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 11:07 pm

        All true, PRCS.

        • Mark Swan says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 4:04 pm

          Absolutely “The term “radical Islam” gives the false impression that a “moderate” version exists.” Good Point PRCS.

    • EmHotep says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 11:52 pm

      Marina, by first hand experience, I can easily tell you that, those so called cultural muslims, when they reach enough numbers, will start oppression against non muslims and it will be followed by torture and beheadings .. The only way to tackle them is “zero tolerance”. If they are real cultural muslims then they should give up islam.

      Greetings from Turkey.

      • PRCS says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 9:23 am

        Agree.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:08 pm

        Very true, EmHotep.

    • Demsci says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 1:17 am

      You formulated the challenge for Trump and Western governments and people very well.

      The “cultural Muslims” don;t know Islam, yet respond in an offensive way when it is attacked and they tend to join ranks with a worldwide “Ummah”, perceiving war with all Islam and Muslims, rather than thgt they identify with a national identity. And even if such Muslims are patriots, then still they might disagree with their nations democratic system and want shariah for it.

      For me, in such a conundrum it helps if I remember not only what I am against, but more emphatically what I am FOR. I can be enthousiastic about that,

      and I dare declare that Muslims are Kuffars to MY democratic ideology, that they are MISSING something great,.

      and I can say that that ideology developed after Islam and that it is much better than Islam. And that it is more accurate to call the Democratic system anti Islam than it is to call the Islamic system anti-Democratic. I feel very comfortable to be FOR some Ideology, societal system. Instead of being only AGAINST ISLAM.

      • PRCS says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 9:23 am

        Interesting perspective.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:14 pm

        Yes, Demsci–it is not just opposing Islam, but also defending our own civilized values!

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 11:28 am

      @Marina

      There is no Radical Islam. No Moderate Islam. Those are Western terms invented by arrogant leftists.

      “Moderate Muslim Myth by Bill Warner”
      https://youtu.be/Y46rmJnSr0Q

      There’s just Islam. How could any Muslim read the peaceful revelations in the Koran, but not know about the 75% that’s violent?

      Do you know about Abrogation? The later violent Medina revelations make the earlier Mecca revelations obsolete. They no longer exist and may as well be removed from the Koran. That’s one way Muslims like to fool you: By pointing to the obsolete peaceful passages and claiming Islam is a religion of peace. But with Abrogation, if that peaceful revelation is later contradicted by a different revelation, the later version replaces the older version, the older version meaning absolutely nothing. It’s a bait and switch.

      Did you know that Islamic law allows outnumbered Muslims to attend Catholic Mass, participate in Christian rituals, and accept the Holy Eucharist? How could we possibly “vet” Muslims willing to do that? We can’t. They’re trained liars from birth, and they feel no guilt when lying, as you and I do.

      “Taqiyya by David Wood”
      https://youtu.be/INAjqzW5cT0

      The Koran and Sunnah are mandatory, as is the emulation of Muhammad. This is non-negotiable. According to Islam, no human on Earth gets to pick out which parts of Sharia to follow, and which to ignore.

      They consider the Koran to be the literal word of Allah. To reform it would be to deny the initial “perfection” of Allah’s word, and Muhammad as the perfect man. That’s why reformation, or “moderation” of any kind is never going to happen. This is called Blasphemy, punishable by beheading.

      Do you know about the 3 Stages of jihad? In Stage 1, where you likely live, Muslims are commanded to pretend to be kind and peaceful when they’re outnumbered and they couldn’t possibly win a fight. It’s all just a lie. As their numbers grow, so does their level of aggression.

      “3 Stages of jihad by David Wood”
      https://youtu.be/ERou_Q5l9Gw

      There are no “good” Muslims. Good Muslims apostatize and divorce themselves from the evil. The ones left, who truly buy into it have hearts and souls manipulated by demons. So, trying to sort out the good Muslims from the bad ones is impossible. If they were good people, they wouldn’t be Muslim.

      Did you know only 7% of Germans were Nazi? Our grandfathers had not the money, time, nor method to sort out the good Germans from the bad. So we bombed every German man, woman, and child in sight until they surrendered unconditionally. We wouldn’t have won the war if we didn’t.

      We’d best develop the stomach and will to do the same.

      Objective: Worldwide forced criminalization of Islam. Mandatory Apostasy.

      • Peggy says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 8:46 pm

        They have a perfect built in self defence mechanism.
        They are allowed and even told to adjust any way they have to in order to fool us.
        How do you go up against that?

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 8:55 am

          Great question Peggy. As trained liars from birth, encouraged by their “deity” to proudly deceive, most could likely pass a polygraph during any kind of “extreme vetting” process we could devise.

          We must force their apostasy, for certain. But how?

          I don’t pretend to have the answer for that. However, an expert in Islam like Robert, in consultation with longtime Imam/Caliph Apostates may be able to develop a Taqiyya-proof vetting system.

          I emphasize longtime Imam/Caliph Apostates, versus those developing an on-the-fly (Taqiyya) method with which to fool us after we have a gun to their heads once our war on Islam begins.

  17. abad says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 7:05 pm

    President Trump can do it – and moreover, any Muslim in the United States of America who is caught committing a crime like Ft Lauderdale, Orlando, San Bernardino, or Boston, should be deported. Such people need to lose ALL citizenship privileges.

    American citizenship is a privilege, NOT a right.

    Go Trump!

    • Terry says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:50 pm

      The perps of San Benadino ( well they are already dead), Ft Lauderdale Airport, Ft Hood, should NOT BE DEPORTED.

      JUST EXECUTED.

      And that goes for the wife of the Orlando killer. Who KNEW WHAT HE WAS GOING TO DO- AND DROVE HIM TO THE NIGHTCLUB.

      Which, (if answered-I never saw it)- why-after she was questioned once, was she not arrested, (knowing- then that she had driven him, and that he was armed-and a rifle is not a self defense weapon in a bar), not watched and allowed to be -basically incommunicado for what? A year plus? Was this the Comey FBI operating under the Loretta Lynch idea of (In)Justice for women and minorities? (Incidental point, that night there was a Latin music thing also, so some(?) (many?) of the people might not have been gay, just music aficionados.

      • gungadin says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 3:27 am

        Loretta Lynch was another POS of obozo’s administration………GOD there is SUCH a HUGE swamp to drain in and around DC !!!

        Good Luck Mr. President, I and millions of others are behind your efforts !!

      • abad says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 3:42 pm

        OK I respect your wanting to see them executed but I still think that by denying Muslims – you know, those people who hate us so much they want to kill us – access to our nation’s soil is a far more severe punishment for them.

        Kick them all out before they can do any further harm to us.

        And I do think at some point in his presidency Trump will make it illegal to become a Muslim.

        Islam has not now nor will ever belong in the United States of America.

        Period.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 9:08 am

          ICBMs, nuke on a container ship, nuke smuggled into Times Square in the back of a U-Haul, submarines:

          There are plenty of ways to hurt us badly from abroad.

          Deportation of Muslim citizens with no birthright is a great idea, and I’m on board with you. However, that won’t eliminate the Islamic threat or win the war for us.

    • Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 9:15 pm

      “American citizenship is a privilege, NOT a right.”

      Not according to the Fourteenth Amendment:
      “Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

      • PRCS says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 9:37 pm

        Thank you.

      • Demsci says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 1:34 am

        I see.

        I wish there was some distinction between on the one hand; American citizen, who is just an “. Inhabitant” of America. And on the other hand an APDC; Accountable Patriotic Democratic Citizen. A class higher.

      • eur says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 2:54 am

        Nationality should be removed from any Muslim in the West. Anyone who professes Islam should renounce nationality and citizenship. Islam is not a religion. All the West should be in a state of exception against Islam.

        • gungadin says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 3:29 am

          AGREE totally eur !!

        • Peggy says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 9:41 pm

          First we have to revoke the title of religion from Islam because that is the only way we can outlaw it.
          We relabel it a cult or a terrorist organisation.

      • abad says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 3:45 pm

        Oh really?

        Then why does deportation exist?

        Keep in mind I am talking about people who come here, become naturalized, then start committing all sorts of crimes on a mass scale.

        A right cannot be revoked.

        A privilege can be revoked.

        And, lest I forget. 🙂

        Coming into the United States of America and deciding to make one’s home here is NOT a right.

        It is a privilege.

        • abad says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 3:48 pm

          And as a footnote, since Muslims are so incredibly vocal about hating the United States and slaughtering us they NEED to be looked at VERY carefully when they decide to come here.

          No.

          They have no “right” at all to come here.

          They DO have the Absolute Right to stay in their own Middle Eastern nations though.

          They will never be welcomed here.

  18. Don McKellar says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 7:27 pm

    The comparison of Reagan vs. Communism and Trump vs. Islamic supremacism is a terrific one I hadn’t though of. That is exactly how he is framing this. Absolutely fantastic to hear from Trump. And absolutely the correct way to look at it.

    True, you can never completely wipe it from the face of the world (communism or Islamic supremacism) but you can take all the air out of it, drain its gas tank (mixing metaphors), crush it into irrelevance on the world stage. You can never wipe out a philosophy, but you can stomp and demoralize and delegitimize the great mass of supporters and their enablers who threaten the modern, advanced world to such an extent that they are no longer a factor in anything serious. And that’s Trump’s real goal. It can be done.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 11:10 pm

      Great post, Don.

    • Demsci says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 1:37 am

      Great post, Don, I second GI.

      I add: Somehow you can REPLACE the abominable ideology. In the minds of allies, but also in the minds of Muslims, in the long run.

    • abad says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 3:57 pm

      Containing Islam really is the best solution – Saudi Arabia, Syria, probably both – that way they can have their Paradise Caliphate(TM pending).

      According to the Quran, ISL’s Syria is supposed to be Paradise in Islam – why are not more Muslims flocking to that nation? If that is what they truly desire then they should want to be a part of it.

      Instead of escaping into Europe under the guise of “refugee”, wrecking havoc all over the place.

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 12:36 am

        “Containment” of N Korea and Iran has resulted in their construction of nuclear arsenals though.

        That’s the problem with the Containment plan.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 7:41 pm

          Iran hasn’t been contained *enough*. They’ve had Russia enabling their nuclear program, and under Obama the US funding them. I hope the latter ends under Trump.

        • Peggy says

          Jan 23, 2017 at 8:54 pm

          Unless we want to wipe most of them out, containment is all we have.
          Just looking at it from software point of view. You either clean or quarantine the virus. You cannot leave any trace of it behind.
          But, if we choose to quarantine then we have to make sure they can’t get out and they can’t import anything they can use against us. Sort of make their countries their prisons until they start to evolve.

          I sound like a real dictator now.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 10:38 am

          @gravenimage

          Isn’t the genie already out of the bottle on the “Containment” plan, about 45 years too late?

          Pakistan began their nuclear weapon project in 1972, and tested their first Atomic Bomb in 1984. As far as we know though, to date, all of Pakistan’s 100 – 120 warheads are of the Atomic fission design (A-Bomb), versus the vastly more lethal Hydrogen thermonuclear fission/fusion (H-Bomb) design, which are much more difficult to produce.

          However, N Korea and Iran seem to be partners in crime, with N Korea detonating its first H-Bomb in 2016. Iran always has a team of scientists present at every N Korean test.

          But Iran is more advanced with the missile technology, which may suggest the two “contained” nations are working together to share technology.

          Although Russia has irresponsibly helped Iran develop nuclear reactors for energy, in my opinion, they haven’t shared any WMD weapons technology with them.

          Same with N Korea: I’m certain China has neither given either the fat punk or his dead father any of their 20 warheads nor instructed them how to build them. If that were the true, N Korea would’ve had H-Bombs decades ago, and have viable technology for ICBMs like the technology Bill Clinton handed over to the Chinese in exchange for DNC donations. This, being treason of the worst kind for which Bill Clinton should be hanging from the end of a rope.

          An aside: China tested its first H-Bomb in 1967, but lacked delivery vehicles to put them on American targets via ICBM. Clinton, however, traded “commercial” rocket technology to them (for DNC cash) to put harmless television satellites into Low Earth Orbit (LEO). But it’s the same technology used to put nuke warheads into LEO.

          On top of all that, the Chinese had spies in Los Alamos that stole both our Neutron Bomb technology, which the US stupidly banned, along with our highly coveted Multiple Independent Re-entry Vehicle (MIRV) technology, which allows us to put up to 10 warheads on just one missile, put the missile into LEO, then peel the warheads off one at a time whenever and wherever we like with GPS precision. The Chinese know how to do all of that now. They’re masters of intellectual property theft: Everything from cell phones, TVs, Neutron Bombs, and MIRV ICBMs.

          Bottom line: Even if we contain all the bad guys into their Dar al-Islam shitholes, they still have the WMD already (Pakistan), and Iran is just months or weeks away from their own H-Bomb tipped ICBMs. So, they can devastate us from the other side of the planet, regardless of any containment measures from us.

  19. Muhammad's Ghost says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 8:08 pm

    I hope that his administration has the courage to name the problem at its source: Quran, Hadith, Sharia.

  20. EmHotep says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 8:13 pm

    IS is the result not the cause, the cause is islam !

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 11:11 pm

      So true, EmHotep.

  21. Mark A says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 8:18 pm

    President Trump is off to a good start. I totally support everything he said in this speech to the CIA.

  22. gravenimage says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 10:05 pm

    Trump at CIA: “We have to get rid of ISIS. We have no choice….This is a level of evil that we haven’t seen”
    ………………………………

    As noted, just having someone calling this savagery *evil* is a breath of fresh air.

  23. Joe says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 1:02 am

    Trump knows the problem. He has Sebastian Gorka as advisor and I’ve seem him often in video clips at Trump tower. Trump cannot drain all the swamps in one day and a half. He has to climb his way up.

    As Mr. Spencer said, you cannot destroy an ideology completely. Because an ideology is a thought or several thoughts.

    What Trump can do and what he will do is destroying this new caliphate project first.

    I think to destroy Islamic terrorism completely he/we have to destroy the Islamic Umma completely. What do I mean by that? Like with the Nazis we would have to destroy their leadership and their troops and all buildings related to that. Which are all mosques and “holy” sites. Possible? Yes. Likely? Not in the short future.

    I think we will see a catalyst to destroy it: The carnage in Europe in the next 10-20 years. When people see how really brutal and evil Islam is, they will understand what needs to be done. Until then we can just clean our country from the moles and corrupt dhimmis. To be ready when the time is right for the great war. President Trump will not be in office anymore after 8 years, so we can just hope he does the best to prepare the country and that the leaders after him know what they’re doing.

    That’s how I see it.

    • Lu says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 2:29 am

      Joe, that’s very interesting thought – in your last paragraph; realistically, if he accomplishes that “cleanup”, the progress would be enormous. We have to see the big picture and must be patient, making small steps, one at a time. And yes – Europe will succumb to it. If one starts thinking about the avenues of European events unfolding in the next 10-20 years, the word “war” or “carnage” gives the only logical outcome … I am sorry to say this; I myself am European and seeing my continent in this fatal spiral of surrender pains bitterly …

      • Joe says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 7:07 pm

        Stay strong Lu! There’s also still the possibility to move overseas. I think what happened last century in the Forties is the blue print for the war coming. Just Islam this time and not the Nazis. All the best to you my friend!

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 12:40 am

      We can criminalize the “practice or promotion” of Islam, and force that on Dar al-Islam.

      The “practice or promotion” of Nazism is illegal in Germany, and they’re having great success with that law.

      • Joe says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 5:27 pm

        Daniel, that is exactly what needs to be done! Islam needs to be revealed to the world at what it is: A war, death and pedophile cult.

        Imo every hope Islam will change and can be formed to a peaceful religion is for ignorants. 1400 years and it didn’t change. Why should it change now? Just because we hope so?

        The scriptures of Islam and Muhammad are the source of all evil.

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 24, 2017 at 11:15 am

          @Joe

          Good points Joe.

          Jihad is compulsory for all Muslims.

          They’re either in the Ummah or they’re not. Muslims won’t criticize their brothers, and why would they? They’re all following the rules of their source texts. They believe the Koran is the literal word of their deity. Remember, no one gets to debate Allah. This is why Islam will NEVER be reformed. It can only be criminalized.

          Reforming Islam would deny the initial “perfection” of Allah’s word and Muhammad as the perfect man. This won’t happen in 10 years. This won’t happen in 10,000 years.

          Islam hasn’t changed in 1400 years for a reason: It’s illegal. To even suggest reformation is called Heresy or Blasphemy, usually punishable by death.

          The Koran, Sira, and Hadith are non-negotiable, compulsory for every human on Earth.

          Emulating Muhammad (the liar, mass murderer, robber, rapist, and pedophile, “the perfect man”) is also mandatory.

  24. sidney penny says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 1:45 am

    Robert, you say”If Trump ends the Islamic State,”

    Should the focus also be on Boko Haram ( even if they are localised)

    Michelle Obama did not bring back the girls

    • ECAW says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 6:04 am

      Didn’t Boko Haram declare themselves a branch of ISIS a while ago?

      • John C. Barile says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 9:53 pm

        Yes, they did declare their allegiance to the Islamic State.

  25. f c king says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 2:48 am

    It is good to hear an American President calling Islamic Terrorism and jihad what it is. Hussein obama has done everything in his power to help spread this menace, his religion of peace.
    Hopefully, severe restrictions will be place on all that try to enter our country from the Jihad belt. We should also get rid of the huge number of Somalis that were brought over as relatives of ones living here, but were not. Treat all of these frauds as what they are and send them home.

  26. Ronen says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 3:09 am

    How dare he tell the troth?

  27. Champ says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:02 am

    Anyone marching in protest of Trump as their president, feel free to keep marching South to Mexico, or North to Canada. Better yet, head on over to China, Cuba, or the Middle East (outside of Israel) and send a postcard about how that women’s rights March goes for you. Weren’t some of you moving to Canada anyway, “If Trump won?” And since your so big on marching and protesting for human rights, I trust we will be seeing y’all at the pro-life March as well, yes?

  28. duh swami says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:52 am

    ‘Now is the time for good men to come to the aid of their country;…

    And who steps up? President Donald J Trump…The ‘great work’ haws just begun and when it’s done, we will have won…Go Prez Trump…

  29. BC says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 6:04 am

    Actually DT we have, The activities of ISIS mirror the Nazis exactly

    World domination
    Death to ‘dissidents’
    Master race, Best of people.
    Lying propaganda.
    Jews blamed for everything
    Slavery
    Women belong in the home
    Everyone is out to destroy Germany/Islam
    Complete contempt for those who are infidels, non Aryan
    Everything is permitted to extend the influence of Islam/Aryan race

    It is obvious that Hitler is their inspiration and model.
    Fortunately they have not been able to extend their territories to the extent the Nazis did.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 5:11 am

      It’s the other way around.

      Nazism was a cheap knock-off of ISLAM.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 7:51 pm

        Yes–Muhammed much predated Hitler.

      • Peggy says

        Jan 23, 2017 at 9:00 pm

        Great post. Islam has been able to expand much further than Nazis did. Most of Europe is infested with them and no prospect of getting rid of them. At least the Nazis knew they were going back home eventually but Muslims just made themselves at home.
        Nazis didn’t reach as far as US but Islam did.
        Nazism was never defended by the west but Islam is. How do we defeat an enemy which we throw support at?
        There has never been or will be anything to match Islam.

  30. Marty says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 6:25 am

    He’s correct of course.
    Just one point.
    ISIS is a direct product of Saudi Arabian ideology & is
    identical in values to the Saudi Regime.
    The Saudis are armed to the teeth by the West, notably the British.
    The disgusting Cameron even put them on the UN “human rights” committee.
    It’s not smart to attack a minor gang, while arming & supporting the top
    mafiosi.

    • ECAW says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 6:36 am

      Small correction Marty. ISIS don’t approve of monarchs placing themselves between Allah and the ummah. Oops.

  31. LairdKintyre says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 6:35 am

    The more I see the more I am convinced Trump has been carried up to Power by God Himself. I am certain he shall be going down in History as a 21st century Jan Sobieski. He will bring Western Civilization togeather and the Islamic menace will be dealt with once and for all. I am not American. I live in Canada. But I am 100% behind this great man. God bless You, Donald Trump. God bless America. There is a great work to be done.

  32. billybob says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 7:05 am

    Where is Ibrahim Itace Muhammad when you need him? I was looking for his usual comments on “Mad Dog Trump” and denying that “radical Islamic terrorism” is actually orthodox and mainstream in Islam. Perhaps he has finally realized the truth. Of course the truth is obvious just by examining the life of Muhammad (may the fleas of a thousand camels infest his armpits). Muhammad was a radical terrorist if there was ever one. Just ask his victims all over the Arabian Peninsula that he murdered, pillaged, raped, and enslaved.

  33. duh swami says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 7:07 am

    If God is involved, expect a miracle …If not, hard work is required,,,Wiping ‘Radical’ Islamic terrorism off the face of the Earth is a really bug task…

  34. Ali Bey says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 8:52 am

    Dear Donald: Forget those bitches who shout in the streets of Washington and London against you but they never rally-manifest against the oppression of women in Muslimistans nor against the harassment by immigrants, and free us from radical islamism . Amen.

    • abad says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 4:02 pm

      Amen!

  35. Sam says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 9:19 am

    Please Support Trump, Geller, Robert and other heros. The enemy; Islam and Liberals will not stop hating America. If we dont start making headway in fighting Islam with Trump it wont happen again in our life time.

  36. Ajay Singh says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 9:52 am

    Thank You Mr. President,

    Its the time to get united to combat the evil perception that creating the basis for terrorism and war.

    Presently, the achievements of scientific insight are resurrecting beyond the process of Nature, and the graces of spirituality are descending to a dangerous abyss.

    In fact, our money and gun power are not potential enough to combat the thoughts of terrorism that conceals their sins behind religious narcissism that enthralled in mazes of terrestrial and political issues.To overcome the perils of “hate religious campaign” and terrorism, we’ll have to clarify the roots of faith and the facts of the materialism disgracing all believers and atheist alike. Till now, we are only destroying the embodiment of terrorism, ignoring its brutal ideology still invincible before the entire world.

    It had been always lethal to write or address in favor or against the institutionalized faith of human being divided by several religious and political strictures. For a “unanimous conclusion” to tackle the clashes between religion and state, theism and atheism, We will have to explore for the unification of the public perception according to our contemporary needs. Even it is essential for the success of any sustainable development and secure the safety of our oncoming generation and rescue humanity from the shadow of Nuclear weapons.

    Lei us unify to uproot the basis for terrorism right now.

    https://www.change.org/p/define-the-basis-of-moral-education-by-unification-of-all-the-religious-definitions-in-one-notion

  37. Ajay Singh says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 10:00 am

    Many complicated questions confront the world’s leadership and all leading religious instructors who thirst for a unanimous conclusion for global security in the current predicament of nuclear proliferation, terrorism and war, within the context of the moral crisis in political ethics and religious conflicts.

    1. Is our world leadership united and coherent enough to combat the sources of terrorism and war given the rise of scientific insights that continue to design and manufacture lethal weapons for mass killing (that is, nuclear weapons)?

    (In fact, the effect of our genetic nature had always forced us to use whatever we have created for individual conceptions of safety and peace)

    2. Is it possible for the entire world led by God for human beings to uproot the sources of religious conflicts that erupt in the blood of massacre?

    (No! They are enthralled in the strictures of their own religious tradition. It is impossible for them to surrender their own religious profession to transcend their own faiths to fill in the religious gaps that divide human perception)

    3Do UN bureaucracies and administrations have enough potential to lead the global community on the path toward peace and propel those in positions of leadership to overcome complicated political issues, humanitarian crises, and religious conflicts?

    ( No! The UN embodies potential political ethics are beyond the reach of the general public)

    4Are we safe neglecting these larger issues that force us to an unnatural end?

    ( No ! Never!! )

    5 Do we have ample, sufficient, and appropriate ideas and resources to combat those masterminds that have converted humankind into “lethal bombs”

    ( No ! The current world’s political race is based mostly on professional issues, neglecting the true facts that separates the existence of humankind, within the mazes of religious and political views)

    To solve these contemporary controversies’ of this current human race armed by lethal Nuclear weapons, We’ve tried to approach the world literate community, beyond their inherited political and religious thoughts, to help the United Nation to overcome the perils of terrorism and war, by promoting the sources of MORAL education within the scientific and professional academic system.

  38. Dan King says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 11:08 am

    ISIS went from a jv local terrorist group to a Worldwide Varsity Champion terrorist movement under obama’s CIA chief Brennhan (muslim coverted in Saudi Arabia before obama moved him up to the top) direction. Wonder why? Both obama’s pick of him and the growth to worldwide terror under the muslim CIA chief?

  39. Noel says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 1:23 pm

    From here in Wales Trump seems like a breath of fresh air in a room full of old farts.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 11:23 pm

      🙂

  40. William says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    ISIS should be paranoid right now for they can expect the unexpected. Trump isn’t going to broadcast any action he plans to take against them. They will be shocked to find bombs on their heads in the most inopportune places, American soldiers kicking down their doors at any hour of the day or night, sabotage, infiltration, kidnapping, deception, subterfuge, betrayal, and all manner of warfare. And there won’t be a word about it from Trump. The fanatics won’t know what hit them. The days of playing nice is over. In war, all’s fair.

  41. davej says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 3:22 pm

    The American Media needs to step up to it’s responsibilities and show the depth of savagery and the extent of the destruction of civilized life now going on in Europe. This is typical Muslim behavior and is already starting to spread to America. Forget that it is politically incorrect to report the truth – Americans must be made to see what awaits them.

    An accurate portrayal of Islam and the results of immigration is essential to getting the popular support that Trump needs to fight this menace. Left to themselves many Americans are content to bask in isolationism and legendary exceptionalism, but these will not save them from the Islamic plan for America.

    This country was very reluctant to get involved in WWII but this changed dramatically as the size of the Nazi forces were revealed and of course on December 7th. We had our modern day Pearl Harbor in 2001 but our leadership went all mealy mouthed and chose appeasement instead of recognition of the danger.

    Better late than never.

  42. Rich says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:19 pm

    isis isis isis – is just another smoke screen!!

    ITS ISLAM, ITS THE QURAN, AND ITS CENTURIES OLD

  43. Sovereign Man says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 4:37 pm

    “This is a level of evil that we haven’t seen.” No Donald, it’s a level of evil most of the world has refused to see until just recently. Those who have lived under and on the borders of Islam have experienced this level of evil continuously for the past 1400 years.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 5:08 am

      Exactly. A reading of Serge Trifkovic’s “The Sword of the Prophet” or of Andrew Bostom’s “The Legacy of Jihad”, or of K S Lal’s account of the atrocities wrought by Muslims in India, is quite sufficient. or a reading of any account of the jihad genocide of the Armenian Christians at the outset of the 20th century… placed side by side with a reading of what the Muslims of north Sudan did to the non-Muslims of the south, and to black Muslims in Darfur, or a reading of the exploits of the Mahdi in the 19th century… and on , and on, and on.

      A constant reiteration of the same horrors, century after century, in places far apart from one another in space and time, but united in one thing only: that the victims were not Muslim, and the sadistic perpetrators, revelling in the pain and terror of tormented, raped, mutilated victims, were Muslims.

  44. Joe says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 7:39 pm

    “If Trump ends the Islamic State, it won’t end Islamic jihad”, as stated above, I agree totally. I also find that it is a relief to finally have someone in the USA that has the desire and the authority to do something to slow it down, I hope!!!

  45. Pal says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 8:09 am

    Where is my text that I posted on that thread yesterday ??????????????????
    Why is it removed ????????????????????

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 5:14 pm

      If you think a comment has been removed, Pal, you can contact Jihad Watch at the “Contact Us” box on the right-hand side or bottom of the page, depending on your screen configuration.

      Once or twice I have thought a post was missing, when instead it was on a similar story–for instance there are a couple of stories about Trump confronting the Jihad threat right now.

  46. John A. Marre says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 9:18 am

    He gets it. That’s why the left hates him.

  47. Pal says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 9:30 am

    1. Bravo, Robert Spencer, to you and your article, its point, and esp the “radical” Islam moment!
    I would advise you to expand it a bit and offer it to be published in a media such as at least of The Hill scope. It must be regarded a kind of reading that millions must read from now on.

    2. The point with Trump team emulating Ronald Reagan team and Evil empire fight is very correct, in his message and in your text. Only a vast Western effort brought the empire of evil, of the Communism and the left to the ground.
    “We will reinforce old alliances and form new ones and unite the civilized world against radical Islam”, Trump said.
    Communists and leftists are Godless people.
    Ronald Reagan was a Godly one, and he regularly spoke of “One nation under God!”. That was a message of unification and of an aim.

    3. First and very quick approval of Trump’s secretary was that of General Mattis (second – of DHS secretary Kelly) and his first visit after inauguration was to the CIA.
    That means much.
    The earlier “radical” Islam is being addressed the better.
    The later we do it – it knows what to do with the world around it, and already carved 56 Islamic countries out of the rest of the world, with many more Islamic territories in non-Islam lands.

    4. TomSJr and PRCS, I find what you say about discrediting Islam as very relevant. Here I see a role of people like Mr Robert Spencer. We need cohorts of them, not separate individuals. A stream should shape up, not only individual voices that are more easily to suppress.
    Communism discreditation was one of the main international tool for the success against it, in parallel to the huge transnational military, economic, else components of the march against it.
    At first, two things should be made very clear to largest possible public: that Jihad fight and all those “radicals”, “wolves” with their “ideology” are a part of islam, not standing outside of it; and that
    ”islamophobia”, “islamophobes” is only a narrow-minded invention that serves Jihad and smashes free understanding.

  48. Salome says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 3:48 pm

    CBS is putting out that the President brought with him his own 40-person cheer squad. Any responses to this?

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Infidel on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.