• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Trump vows to “eradicate completely” “radical Islamic terrorism”

Jan 20, 2017 4:40 pm By Robert Spencer

“We will … unite the civilised world against radical Islamic terrorism which we will eradicate completely from the face of the earth.”

Strictly speaking, it isn’t possible within four years, or eight, to eradicate “radical Islamic terrorism” (which is actually orthodox and mainstream in Islam) as long as there are people who believe the Qur’an is the perfect and eternal word of Allah. There will always be some believers who get the idea that they can please Allah by killing and being killed for him (cf. Qur’an 9:111). However, Trump’s declaration, while hyperbolic, was a welcome indication of his apparent determination to speak honestly about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat, and to combat it and roll it back.

“Donald Trump inauguration: President vows to ‘eradicate radical Islamic terrorism’ in first address to nation,” by Feliks Garcia, Independent, January 20, 2017:

President Donald Trump echoed his hard-line stance against “radical Islamic terrorism” in his first address as the 45th president of the United States.

“We will … unite the civilised world against radical Islamic terrorism which we will eradicate completely from the face of the earth,” he said during the Inaugural Address….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Donald Trump, Featured Tagged With: Inaugural Address


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. marina says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 4:42 pm

    Mr. Pres you should start with CAIR and Muslim Brotherhood.

    • nicu says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 4:51 pm

      Go for it , Mr. President !

      Green Party in germany of course are shocked about the speech – who cares ? they are hardcore muzzie lovers !

      • Seabird says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 6:02 pm

        Not entirely true, it was a leader of the German Green Party (a Turk) who introduced and passed a resolution recognizing the Armenian Genocide to the credit of his Party and the German Nation.
        Something Obama promised to do while campaigning but later reneged on
        as he didn’t want to upset his buddy, the Erdogan tyrant.

        • Mahendra Singh says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 8:26 pm

          Well, Turks are at least halfway civilized. They have had a tradition of democracy for a century. If it was an Arab Muslim, like one from N Africa, it would be different.

        • no_one says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 9:07 pm

          Turks are civilized. There are many Turks who don’t follow islam.

        • andra says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 6:38 am

          You should read the resolution and put it into the actual German political context. He did not recognize the Turkish guilt but introduced the German guilt for the Turkish genocide. It was only the next vehicle to built up a new guilt cult in Germany. On the same day this resoulution passed the Bundestag the German politicians started to work on the next gulit complex for Namibia.

          And Özdemir, the greenie, and his feollow Turks in the German Bundestag (and there are a lot of them) have only started this Resolution in order to take care of their own fututre. They have both the German and Turkish passport. By critizising Turkey they only want to avoid that they will lose the German passport one day and sent back to Turkey, where they belong as they only make Turkish politics in Germany. They will cry ASYL as soon as this might happen. And that´s all the resolution was for.

        • DFD says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 6:47 am

          Andra:

          100% SPOT ON!
          =============

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 11:15 pm

          Thank you, Andra and DFD.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 11:06 pm

      And Fethullah Gulen. Don’t forget him and his ‘Gulen’ movement. Out he should go, with a big kick up the backside; and ALL of his financial dealings and properties etc within the USA require to be investigated by forensic accountants.

      Apply RICO to both Gulen and the Brotherhood/ CAIR.

      And then there’s the House of Saud, and Qatar, and the Emirates, and all the *other* Islamic entities, both state and non-state, that are entrenched all over the USA and the West.

      Start with the Ikhwan, sure… but then proceed to the *rest*.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 4:35 pm

        Yes–he has a compound in Pennsylvania, and is running his “education” empire from it. No reason he should be in the United States.

    • f c king says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 2:44 am

      I agree fully. Religion is a person’s choice, so long as it does not harm anyone nor promote death to all that fail to convert to this religion or submit to it’s rule. Islam demands this of it’s followers.
      The Muslim Brotherhood is outlawed as terrorist in Egypt. CAIR is a Known affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood.. Does anyone remember what happened in Egypt when Hussein Obama backed the Muslim Brotherhood’s rise to power and the aftermath ? Many non-muslims in Egypt died because their “new Democracy” elected a radical islamic president ? The one obama backed.

      • Demsci says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 4:47 am

        You point out what Islam is literally teaching.

        Agreed of course. But you know how Muslims and Political Corrects (try to) weasel out from under that argument to resist Islam, don’t you?

        They will say that Christianity does the same, see the Old Testament. And that there are “extremists” in every religion. So hence; tatah; you are Islamophobic!

        So, you have to go a step further and point out the difference between Islam and Christianity (and other faiths).

        And point out that by now there are mountains of evidence, that while Christians interpret and practice ther faith almost entirely in harmony with Democracy, and support and promote it almost anywhere

        there are in this world at least hundreds of millions of Muslims who INTERPRET and PRACTICE Islam in a profound anti-democratic way, that is in profound contradiction to some very important democratic laws and values.

        • Anne Smith says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 1:05 pm

          Sharia is incompatible with democracy and the rule of law.

          All Muslims wish to implement Sharia.

          Ergo, Muslims are unable to embrace democracy and the rule of law.

        • Raja says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 7:21 pm

          Demsci,

          Agreed 100 percent. Good one.

        • billybob says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 8:25 pm

          “They will say that Christianity does the same, see the Old Testament.”

          They can say that all they want but it is not true. Christianity is defined by the teachings and example of Christ, not by the Old Testament.

      • Tom says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 5:28 am

        Religion is the real problem. To paraphrase Karl Marx: ” religion is the opiate of the masses”.

        You either believe in God or you do not. Period, the rest is fluff and most educated people know it.

        • ECAW says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 7:59 am

          You are not paraphrasing Marx but simply quoting him, but here is the full quote:

          “Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.”

          Doesn’t sound so one-way does it?

          This statement:

          “You either believe in God or you do not. Period, the rest is fluff and most educated people know it.”

          is fantastically ignorant and well, bigoted (a word I rarely use but you push me to it). How can anyone think it has no consequences which version of God you believe in? I wouldn’t invite Yahweh to tea. God seems rather more benign according to his PR man, but Allah is a sadistic ogre who knows nothing about his own universe and can’t wait to get you into his torture chamber.

          It is hardly surprising that they have given rise to such different civilisations.Yahweh and God have become largely house trained over the last few thousand years but Allah never will be. He needs to be kicked out of the house or he will take it over and turn it into a hell on earth just like everywhere else he has been allowed to gain a foothold.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 11:19 pm

          Tom wrote:

          You either believe in God or you do not. Period, the rest is fluff and most educated people know it.
          …………………………

          So–the difference between “love thy neighbor as thyself” and “kill the unbeliever wherever you find him” is just “fluff”?

          One does not have to believe in any God to see the difference in effect between faiths.

    • BC says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 3:28 am

      Agreed
      ‘as long as there are people who believe the Qur’an is the perfect and eternal word of Allah’
      In other words people who live in a world of delusion, not many realise that Muslims believe in evil spirits
      just like people did before the Rennaissance

    • Christianblood says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:54 am

      Dear Mr. President, to eradicate radical Islamic terrorism one should go to the root of the problem and the root of the problem is not radical islamic terrorism because radical islamic terrorism is just a symptom. The root of the problem, Mr. President, is Islam itself.

      • Peter says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 1:01 pm

        You are right .How would you do it! How will bell the cat!

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 11:20 pm

        True.

    • pbay says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 9:32 am

      They were obama’s advisers on Egypt. Should be really easy to locate them.

      Indite these co-conspirators

  2. EmHotep says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 5:01 pm

    Excellent to hear this, please do not forget İhvanü’l-Müslimin (muslim brothers) is directly related to erdogan.

  3. PRCS says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 5:07 pm

    RS wrote:

    “radical Islamic terrorism” (which is actually orthodox and mainstream in Islam)”

    Until the majority of the world’s “filthy unbelievers” understands–and publicly declares–that, the problem will remain.

    If our new president fails to do that……

    • FP says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 5:27 pm

      Absolutely correct. Islam, if practiced according to the Quran and Hadith, is the same as radical Islam. ISIS and the original followers of Muhammad are practically identical in practice and philosophy. If Muslims happen to be peaceful, it is merely because their various schools of interpretation have watered down the original teachings. At its root, it is violent.

      • Norger says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 6:10 pm

        Given human nature, I truly believe that most Muslims are decent human beings. Muslims are victims of Islam. It’s a terrible position to be in; born into a cult that you cannot leave on penalty of death.

        • Agha Ali Arkhan says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 7:05 pm

          We all face the penalty of death from muslims. Muslims should leave that cult to join our penalty of death.

        • roger woodhouse says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 3:12 am

          Yes it is true that Muslims are ‘victims’locked into a religion they dare not leave.We in the West have a duty to point this out to the muslim community.It should become mainstream conversation and laid bare without fear of recrimination.Why cannot this conversation take place?

        • Ron says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 2:18 pm

          Problem is that Muslims believe the tripe of intolerance, murder of innocents, mistreatment of women, world domination and grotesque punishments.

          Because critical thinking is not allowed under Islam, billions of people have been infected by the ideas of a delusional, illiterate sociopath.

          This hard to grasp until you consider that the average I.Q. in the Middle East is 82.

        • Leonidas says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 9:46 pm

          Islam is a political ideology ( >85%) -islamofascism, disguised as a religion ( <15%) ,which is a heresy of Judaism ( mainly from Deuteronomy),according to islam's " holy" book The Koran .Islam must be reformed or perish as president Sisi of Egypt requested of the mullahs in 12/14- see YOU TUBE
          TO DEFEAT BARBARIC ISLAM:
          1-Ban muslim immigration ,which is HIJRAH to infiltrate ,islamize and impose the barbaric sharia law on the world.Muslim refugees should go to vast , rich Saudi Arabia pending return to their countries.
          2-Liberate ALL muslim women from male subjugation imposed by the koran and give them Equality.
          3- Protect Apostates from Islam,Adulterers, Blasphemers, Homosexuals ,Hypocrites from death commanded by the koran.
          4- Denounce the Medina part of the koran and burn it
          as a hate book ,since it teaches the orthodox muslims to become jihadists,never to be friends with infidels, but to kill them ,if they refuse to become muslims or pay to them the jizya dhimmie tax in humiliation.Koran also says women are dumb and they will ALL go to hell , unless their husband says in the Last Day " he was pleased with her!!
          5- Denounce " prophet" Muhammad as a bloody criminal, since according to eye witnesses in sira and hadith he was a murderer,rapist,pedophile,bandit,torturer,liar and slave trader.

          6-Deny nuclear weapons to the Iranian jihadist government , as they will use them in their jihad to terrorize , kill and conquer all of us infidels ,as the koran commands them.

          Then millions of muslims ,especially women ,will abandon evil islam and it will collapse the way the Soviet Union did in 1989

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 11:54 pm

          Unfortunately, Leonidas, a lot of Muslim women are pious Muslims, just like their male counterparts.

      • no_one says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 9:09 pm

        I know peaceful Muslims from Turkey, but for the past few decades Turkey has been a secular country.

        • quota raven says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 9:39 pm

          to No-One, who posits, “for the past few decades Turkey has been a secular country.”

          In your dreams, No-One. What planet do you live on? Erdogan has been ceding power from the reformed, secular government instituted by Atatürk to Islamic forces (Erdogan himself closely allied to the Muslim Brotherhood) and most recently awarded monumental powers to the presidency of Turkey. He has been moving toward Islamist, religious government for the past few decades, and he has been consistent. Also, the women of Turkey, formerly “secular” have increasingly begun wearing the burkha and face coverings required by shariah and the Qur’an. I have a female Turkish friend who lives in NYC, and she has been horrified for twenty years about the direction the Turkish government and Erdogan are taking.

          In recent weeks and months, this has been all over the news, even MSM. Where have you been? Wakie, wakie!

          Cheers!

        • Kenin says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 1:09 am

          Quota Raven is correct. President Recep Erdogan of Turkey said the term “moderate Islam” is ugly and offensive. There is only Islam. Under his leadership, the Ministry of Education will include jihad as compulsory learning for 2017/2018 curricula according to an earlier article by Robert Spencer. All part of his goal to create a pious generation. Welcome to modern Turkey, same as Ottoman Turkey.

        • TH says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 6:12 am

          Erdogan is rolling back secularism in Turkey at a fast pace.

        • DFD says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 7:07 am

          The idea of any secularism in Turkey is simply nonsense!

          There has been indeed a short secular period, under Ataturk, that was it. All else was makalatur. Barring a number of individual exceptions, sometimes the number of exceptions was relatively large. Be all that as it may, at its heart Turkey, and thus most or many Turks, is thoroughly a Muslim, an Islamic country.

          PROOF:
          =======.

          Google the ‘decline’ of Christianity in Turkey, since Ataturk and during Ataturk – and ongoing.

          PS: ‘decline’? Perhaps persecution and ethnic cleansing might be more appropriate.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 11:59 pm

          All grimly true, Quota.

          And as DFD notes, even during Attaturk, Christians were targeted. The last part of the bloody Armenian Genocide took place under his aegis.

      • Demsci says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 5:05 am

        I see something in the attitude of “Hate the sin, love the sinner”. Yes, Muslims are or seem trapped in Islam. But in my experience, they can be very nice and hardworking people. As all of us know I might add.

        We really want to separate Muslims from Islam. We can point out that we respect the fact that there are Islamic countries (although we want them to grow out of it eventually too) to go to for Muslims and with our respect for THAT choice,

        but alas, that in democratic countries, we have discovered that Islam is hindering, not helping, (in a huge eufemism!).

        Yes, why can’t we point out to Muslims how Islam is Untrue, with Robert Spencer, Tom Holland, Jay Smith, Dan Gibson, John Wansbrough, Gerd Puin et all at our disposal?

        and why can’t we point out that Islam seems so useless and obsolete in our modern society? Even if Muslims derive some benefits from Islam, they can as well derive them from other ideologies. Which means that Allah has provided NO IMPROVEMENT whatsoever! With the exception of the promise of afterlife, but that is for 99 % not to be trusted.

        And moreover; aren’t Muslims not a little bit concerned about the move of our society towards “singularity” a profound change, with Artificial Intelligence up and coming?

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 12:04 am

          There will be no intelligence of any kind if pious Muslims have their way with out society.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 12:06 am

          our society

    • Mitch Classic says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 3:21 am

      It seems that American politicians don’t have the courage to speak of opposing Islam without slapping the “radical” modifier on it. The fear is understandable — they’re afraid of criticizing “all Muslims” — but their solution is unacceptable.

      They could just say “jihadist” but they won’t say that, either.

      So if they must say “radical,” they should put the silly word in the noun position and let Islam be the modifier describing the particular type of subversion: Say “Islamic radical.” That way you’ve narrowed the definition of the enemy without distorting the meaning of the word “Islam.”

  4. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 5:11 pm

    Given that there is no such thing as “radical Islam” it is not possible to eliminate its terrorism. But at least he’ll admit that the halfass wishful thinking mirage exists. Prez Barack Hussein couldn’t, or wouldn’t, do even that.

    Any calls on what Trump will do on Islam? My guess is that he’ll back off extreme vetting of the Syrian “refugees” and will send few or none back to the hell-holes from which they came (many Syrian) “refugees” are not from Syria. But he should. All of them were brought in without consent from Congress. If he sent them all home, that would send blockbuster waves through the world, and elicit burning jealousy from citizens in Europe and elsewhere, even ultra-liberal Canada.

    • Custos Custodum says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 5:46 pm

      What we SHOULD do is ship all of these dubious migrants to poor third countries where they will have basic food and medical care, but nothing else. (Especially no Internet service and communications in writing only – let them be bored.)

      Shipping them to their “home” countries means we have to deal with 50 different “home countries” each of which will play games and try to blackmail us. Just set up safe but basic camps in two or three countries and pay them $150 a month for each person housed, $400 for a family.

      • Harvey says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 11:03 pm

        The organizations and leadership of your sponsored host camps will divert your charity to their accounts and as the camps go squalid, complicit media will indict your programs and require more money. Simultaneously, the camp populations will grow rapidly as word spreads with compounding misery. I’m not guessing, it’s prediction from repeated implementaton of that same idea countless times.

      • JMB says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 5:08 am

        #Custos, This has been what the Australian Stopping the Boats solution was all about. Sent illegals to an off shore 4th world location and pay those governments to look after them. A few have returned to their home countries. Obama was going to take some but somehow I don’t think that will now happen. Some (very few) have been transferred to 3rd party countries for re-settlement.. Needless to say the UNHCR is very unhappy with Australia and it’s off-shore detention policy.

    • Don McKellar says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 6:21 pm

      A national conversation will begin on Islam and what is in those texts and why it inspires terrorism. And a national conversation and debate will begin after than on de-religionizing Islam. With Islamic realists like Steve Bannon and Michael Flynn in the White House, this will happen. Get ready.

      • Demsci says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 5:07 am

        That gives me hope!

        • JMB says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 5:10 am

          #Demsci. It gives me a sense of relief that the USA no longer has a president who’s middle name was Hussein. Simple as that.

    • Katnis says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:29 pm

      Here are seven things I think Trump will do:
      1. I think that he will implement a vetting process. I don’t know what it will entail, but he will put one in place
      2. He will not honor commitments to take in “x” number of refugees from countries A, B, C, etc…
      3. He may ship some refugees home
      4. He will bring back a lot of the work on tracking and monitoring muslims living in the US – work that was erased under the Obama administration
      5. He will strengthen relations with Israel
      6. By stating the words “radical islam” (definition not addressed here), he will bring more attention to a concept that the Western world needs to be aware of… That sharia law is not compatible with western values and has no place in the United States. Previously subdued, the media will gain more power in discussing and exposing the evils of islam
      7. Learn about different groups like CAIR or Hamas and make adjustments accordingly. Maybe he will declare them terrorist organizations? Not sure, but he will take some sort of action.

      What else do you think he will do? What else do you think will happen?

      • PRCS says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 9:59 pm

        1. In truth, refugees are supposed to go home–when the peril they’re fleeing is determined to no longer be that.

        2. “Radical Islam” is a nonsense term which whitewashes written, Orthodox Islam. But, there is a silver lining–which you alluded to–in Trump’s using it: IMO the media won’t delve into the truth until more politicians begin to address the issue. On the other hand, politicians are waiting for the media to do that.

        3. Better, I submit, to say Islamic law instead of the non specific, confusing term “Sharia law”.

      • Joe says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 5:32 am

        A big part of the problem would cease, if it was defunded. Look at where ISIS gets it weapons and ammunition. They mostly come from the USA. That is not an accidental twist of fate.

      • Anne Smith says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 1:10 pm

        It is to be hoped that he will weed out Muslims who are in key positions and dishonestly using those position to forward their own agenda.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 12:15 am

        Good call, Katnis.

  5. Bill says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 5:13 pm

    Just the fact that he used the words “Radical Islamic Terrorism” made my day. For starters, I am hopeful that organizations like CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood, which were given unfettered access to our Government by Obama, will be denied that access.

    The promise of eradicating it will be tough to deliver, but eradicating it from the halls of our own Government is a welcome first step. I think it sets a helpful tone for those citizens of European Nations that are struggling to free themselves from Islam’s death grip, a death grip strengthened by their own treasonous leaders.

    Obama made his final White House telephone call to Angela Merkel, his Islamist sympathizing soul mate. I hope Trump makes his first call to Angela Merkel, and start’s it something like this :”Hallo, Angela, before we get into the details, just tell me, “who’s your Daddy”. 🙂

    I hope the citizens of Europe have enough left to take back their destinies but every time I read a new story, that hope seems to grow even more dim.

    I read about the “Build Bridges Not Walls” protests in Europe. Government sponsored, most likely. Just like the violent and non-violent protests against Trump are being financed by Democrat Party supporters, NGOs and money men.

  6. John C. Barile says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 5:44 pm

    Amen, Mr. President. As you said, there’s nothing that we cannot do, and that a united American people cannot be stopped. Surely then, we can start.

  7. Alan Jennison says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 5:46 pm

    Fine words……And as a British Subject who was overjoyed by the Brexit vote, and as Brit who was overjoyed Trump won the POTUS election……

    Now we need actions against Islam……in the USA…..so we can take action against Islam in Europe.

    And YES……we need to dump the crap about climate change……the biggest con in history.

    • John C. Barile says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 7:06 pm

      I’m with you. (And, yes, I don’t believe carbon dioxide and methane are pollutants that our E.P.A. in the U.S. ought to regulate; otherwise, every last living creature on Earth is a pollution source–I don’t believe that these gases are the primary drivers of climate change. Rather, volcanic and cyclical solar activity, a 2-decree cyclical wobble of Earth’s axis, oscillations of the Sun’s magnetic field, and a periodic shift in the geometry of Earth’s orbit around the Sun coupled with a shift in the seasonal occurrence of apogee and perigee–those are the primary drivers of climate change.)

      • Kepha says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 10:07 pm

        Once upon a time, I recall an eco-freak speaker with the brash, confident look of the self-righteous Left, declare that raising cattle polluted the atmosphere due to their methane gas. You should’ve seen the killing look he gave me when I asked him if he really believed that a herd of bison or a herd of elephants didn’t f–t.

        I’m of the mind that there’s something to climate change–but a lot of it is probably linked to natural cycles that we don’t quite understand yet. After all, warm as we’ve gotten, we still can’t practice agriculture in southern Greenland, as the Norse once did.

      • Anne Smith says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 1:13 pm

        Carbon dioxide is essential for trees and plants and all living greenery to grow. If there has been an increase in CO2 it is reflected in the wonderful growth of foliage and trees and planting which we need to balance the horrible sprawl of cities and towns.

        The BBC is quite the worst offender on climate change, it never misses a chance – in any sort of programme – to have a moan about it.

        Thank goodness Trump has not been taken in by the climate change industry. May God take care of him, he will have many enemies.

    • Raja says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:45 pm

      Allen Jennison,

      BTW, in his presidential address he DID mention about harnessing energy from several sources indicating he would not be obsessed with fossil fuel.

      I hope I understood him right.

  8. davej says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 5:48 pm

    We’ve been waiting for someone to say that, now someone has and he’s the President of the United States!

    Not immediately achievable but it definitely sets the tone for an honest debate about the goals of Islam within our borders.

    When you look back at the bowing, kowtowing and delusions of Bush and Obama ever since 9/11 they seem unbelievably weak and even suicidal. At last we are on a new path of realism and pride.

    • Norger says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:02 pm

      “An honest debate about Islam” exactly. Will it become acceptable for our leaders & MSM to admit the fact of and discuss Islam’s death penalty for apostasy, adultery, blasphemy, homosexuality; the HONEST meaning of jihad, Islamic teachings on martyrdom, Jews, Christians, women? I’m still not holding my breath.

      • Kay says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 8:00 pm

        It’s kind of amazing that we aren’t able to discuss it when it’s written right in their texts.

  9. Guest says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 6:03 pm

    Trump is President and Obama’s gone… Because I love to say it I will say it again, OBAMA IS GONE!!!

    • JawsV says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 6:06 pm

      Say it again! Overjoyed. The Islam sympathizer is no longer POTUS.

      • Vic says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 7:48 pm

        I am overjoyed, too. But make no mistake. Obama is staying in DC. He understands full well that the Democrats have received a death blow and he is going to help build the party back up. Think back to his arrogant statement that if he had been the candidate running against Trump, he would have won. He and his party refuse to accept the results of the postmortem. Why? They believe that they are right. The elite who knows what is best for the rest of us populists.
        Additionally, Democrats and some Repubs, are scared to death that if DJT open the doors and allows the light to shine on all their shenanigans/ corruption, they would be exposed. Draining the swamp is good for starters. Calling the enemy by its rightful name puts the Islamic World on notice…the gig is up. We know you’re number. Many of our Congressional reps have taken monies from CAIR, the Saudis, Qatar and many others. All this will be exposed. In the meantime, we will have a fierce fight in our hands Every. Single. Day. from within and without.
        Don’t let up on your prayers. If there was ever a time for us to pray continuously for our leadership, it is now. Stay strong!

        • rubiconcrest says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 8:07 pm

          The longer Obama stays around the better. I cannot explain his popularity but I like what he has done to the Democrat party. So he should keep up the good work. As his legislative record shows he is one of those who are ‘all talk and no action’.

    • Susan B says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 2:16 am

      Happy NOBOMA day.

      • quota raven says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 10:20 am

        Well said, Susan B – It’s amazing how much easier one breathes, non?

        I’m telling everyone I know “Happy Nobama Day”!

        Cheers!

        quota raven

      • Peter says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 1:08 pm

        I agree .Welcome Trump/Hannity/Specer. Bye Bye Obama,Hilary/bill/greatest of all the idiots Burney /Lyndsey/!

  10. JawsV says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 6:04 pm

    There’s no such thing as “radical Islam.” Islam is Islam. Islam is inherently radical, extremist, militant. The phrase “radical Islam” is redundant. As Erdogan of Turkey has said: “There is no moderate Islam. Islam is Islam.”

    President Trump (yay!) doesn’t understand what he’s dealing with. Unless Islam is entirely eradicated the planet will always have Islamic Terrorism. Jihad – it’s in their war manual, the Koran.

    Wonderful there was NO Muslim presence at the inauguration. No hijabs, no imams, yahoo.

    • Keith Gilbert says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 7:07 pm

      Nuke Mecca & Medina and a few other so called islamic holy sites and you’re off to a good start…and that is what it will take for it makes a lie of islam and all their books, pedophile prophets, etc. Those not burned by the ‘holy’ flash of enlightenment when a neutron bomb or worse will quickly turn to ways more acceptable to a civilized world.

      There are simply no alternatives…the savagery of islam proves it every moment of every day!

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 2:46 am

        A man who understands. Great attitude Keith.

        Though I respectfully debate your FIRST DAY targets.

        First step is to prevent any counter-attack with WMD.

        So, were I in charge, on DAY ONE, I’d strike the N Korean arsenal and sink all their submarines, destroy the Pakistani nuke arsenal (I’m sure India has excellent Intel on the locations), destroy the Iranian nuke production facilities, and glass Raqqa.

        Hardware first, threatening population centers later.

        The idea is to first protect ourselves. Then start scaring the shit out of them with population strikes.

        Here’s the problem with hitting all their religious shrines first. It doesn’t prevent a counter-attack. And there’s a chance that more than scaring them, we’ll just infuriate them, and have Kaffir getting mowed down with tractor-trailers Worldwide.

        Imagine if the Muslims in one day destroyed the Vatican, all the most beautiful, oldest churches in the World, such as St. Paul’s, Westminster Abbey, St. Patrick’s, Statue of Liberty, US Capitol, etc. Would that break your Will to Fight and scare you? Or would that piss you off and make you want to retaliate like nobody’s business?

        The objective is to “Break their Will to Fight,” not increase it.

        • quota raven says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 10:30 am

          To Daniel Triplett – As always, Daniel T, your comment is reflective of thoughtful attention to (possibly “unintended”) results of what we do next and first. The product of reasoned analysis and clearly written, what you say has the ring of truth…and authority.

          Thank you, as ever, for your smart input.

          Cheers!

          quota raven

        • quota raven says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 10:34 am

          Daniel T – LOL: my first sentence above is a bit of a muddle (I have so far eschewed coffee this ayem), but you know what I meant. It is meant to be complimentary. Your comments are always arresting, and they are always reflective of deeper thought than most people employ.Cheers! qr

      • Peter says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 1:16 pm

        Agree! We should have mini models ot twin towers erected in every city /town and village in America to show what Islam could do to us and what we can do against Islam . God bless America!

      • Susette says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 7:39 pm

        Islamic holy sites is an oxymoron…

    • Katnis says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:03 pm

      I was equally delighted to see no mooslim presence. While not all commenters here have a relationship with faith – which is perfectly OK – I do, and I was pleased to see conversation and ceremony directed to God (not Allah), the bible (not the koran) and higher values.

      • JawsV says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 8:52 pm

        To my knowledge the only time the Moslems’ war manual the Koran has appeared at a swearing-in ceremony is at Muslim Keith Ellison’s, who claimed to have Thomas Jefferson’s copy, as though Jefferson admired Islam. Jefferson owned a Koran to Know The Enemy.

        Jesus is God.

        Allah is Not.

        • davej says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 12:14 am

          Correct. Jefferson was forced to learn about Muslims and made the appropriate judgement.

          Those who try to use his possession of a Quran as an endorsement are practicing takiyya big time.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 12:21 am

          Exactly, Jaws and dave.

      • Carolyne says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 11:12 am

        I was happy to see no dirty old smelly Mullah pray or caterwaul at the inauguration. It was a hopeful sign.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 22, 2017 at 12:33 am

          Yes, Carolyne–agreed.

    • no_one says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:19 pm

      Trump may know very well that Islam is Islam and it is radical, but in the current situation it is hard even for him to say it.

    • Louise M. says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 12:04 am

      Someone who knows Islam very well, Dr Wafa Sultan says: All Islam is Radical

      http://gatesofvienna.net/2016/09/wafa-sultan-all-islam-is-radical/

      ”Islam is not a religion, it’s a political ideology…..”

    • Debi Brand says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 5:09 am

      “Wonderful there was NO Muslim presence at the inauguration. No hijabs, no imams, yahoo.”

      Indeed. What’s more, that so at this stage of “the game,” damn gutsy.

    • Anne Smith says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 1:15 pm

      And the Rabbi read an excellent lesson and it was very moving. Needless to say, the BBC cut that bit out altogether, and made no mention of it in any news item.

      • Peter says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 1:21 pm

        BBC has become an unparalleled apologist to left wing and Islamic causes. May be it is on Saudi pay roll .

  11. Seabird says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 6:07 pm

    If he (Trump) starts talking about our “close allies like the Saudis, Turks and Pakis”—-
    We’re finished.

  12. PRCS says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 6:09 pm

    A good first step (IMO): remind our neighbors and friends that our constitution’s 1st amendment does not permit religious ACTS which violate U.S. law.

    Carrying out Qur’an 5:38’s command to amputate thieves’ hands (as but one example) is ILLEGAL in this country–per our manmade law.

    Muslims around the world need to be reminded of that, too.

    • Norger says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:21 pm

      Among other things, the First Amendment doesn’t protect sedition. Thanks to the Saudis, that’s what is being preached in mosques all over the US.

      Jihadist mosques should be closed.

      • Jaladhi says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 9:47 pm

        All mosques teach jihad and therefore all of them should be closed. No imam can preach Islam without teaching jihad. It is as simple as that!

        • Debi Brand says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 5:10 am

          Amen, Jaladhi. Well stated.

        • Peter says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 1:24 pm

          All preaching in the mosque should be subject to prior approval by the state(authorized English translation) and should be closely monitored by the state as a first step towards taking legal action including closing down the mosques that violate the rule .

        • Raja says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 7:58 pm

          Jaladhi,

          I admire your comments as they are spot on and very objective…. Keep up the good works..

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 2:47 am

        Then bulldozed to the ground.

        • Debi Brand says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 5:12 am

          “Then bulldozed to the ground.”

          Roger.

        • Laura says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 8:05 am

          Then till in some porcine offal….that should keep ’em away for a while!

  13. Don McKellar says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 6:10 pm

    Yes, on a practical level impossible.

    Yes, on a philosophical and policy level for the United States, EXACTLY RIGHT!

    The national conversation about the truth about Islam is about to begin. Everything that Jihad Watch stands for — telling the true, politically correct facts about Islam and the texts that are the source for jihad terror and Islamic supremacism across the world, will now start to work their way into the national conversation. Political correctness about the topic will gradually become ridiculed and cast aside, just like the fantasies about the Nazis and the communists in decades past.

    Islam will, I predict, become de-religionized in the United States. Yes, I know that is hard to imagine. But so was a president Trump. And a president Trump with Islamic realists like Steve Bannon and Michael Flynn in the White House with him was really hard to imagine a year ago. But all you Jihad readers — GET READY. Just like I led the charge for Trump and made his case on here way back when and all the way through, I am telling you now. This will happen. America will lead the world out of this intellectual Dark Ages. You watch.

    • Don McKellar says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 6:11 pm

      Politically INCORRECT facts about Islam.

      Gee, what can I do to be able to edit my posts on Jihad Watch and fix typos?

  14. Lesley says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 6:16 pm

    This part of President Trump’s speech made my day– and he said, “civilized world” as in uniting against radical Islam… I loved this distinction.

    Give the world a choice to join us in the civilized world against radical (= back to its basic root Islam– that’s how I hear it). I think we can eliminate islamic terrorism in the USA and adequately protect our interests in the next 4 years.

    I didn’t take this to mean that Islamic terrorism would be wiped from Yemen or any other Crapistan– but if LePen gets voted in in France, and Wilders gets voted in for the Netherlands… and whomever else wants to join our efforts to shut this nonsense down, it most certainly can be done.

    Further, if you cut the financial supply to sponsors of Islamic terror, Islamists will have no money to do harm more than scaring goats with firecrackers in their native Crapistan…

    Things are going to change for the better. We now have a master of commerce in the highest office of American government. Business and war share many principles– many people study Sun Tzu’s classic, “Art of War” for business… Islam has always used interruption of commerce as a form of warfare, and there is a lot we can do to ruin their business interests without firing a single shot 🙂

    • PRCS says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 11:20 pm

      “against radical (= back to its basic root Islam– that’s how I hear it”

      IMO–with no facts to back me up–that a “man on the street interview” would result in most folks thinking it refers to a perversion of Islam, rather than a reference to Islam’s core/root/radix.

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 2:54 am

      Remember the UN vote against Israel a couple of weeks ago? Virtually every country on Earth voted against them.

      I’m not real confident on the “Civilized World” concept, and would be much more content if we could simply ally with the Kaffir nuke states, which will take a lot of work in and of itself.

      This conflict will only be reconciled with nukes, unless we want the conflict to continue for decades or centuries.

      So, US, France, UK, Israel, India, China, and Russia. Those are the only states that really matter. This alliance could force our will on the entire planet in a matter of months.

      https://medium.com/@dantriplett/islamic-jihad-is-total-war-for-all-marbles-6c858098b76e#.9cz7jhgon

  15. ibrahim itace muhammed says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 7:00 pm

    clueless mad devil trump has not been specific as to who are these radical islamic terrorists.if he means all those who believe in political islam or that sharia shall govern their entire life even if they do not engage in any act of terrorism will be fought by the united states, then all muslims will be confronted by devil trump govt.if that is what mad devil trump means, then from today we declare war against barbaric trump and his allies in evil.emhotep, a kafir ,said those to be fought should include erdogan to restor atheist secularism to turkey.emhotep, you are just dreaming, kufr is already dead in turkey like kemal ataturk(may allah curse him).mad trump cannot do that job for you the agents of the devil. sharia defenders will emerge victorious at the end in this mighty confrontation. we will start in the name of allah. mr spencer said as long as muslims believe that the quran is supreme words of god, terrorism will remain; because terrorists are the main stream in islam.it is a lie,terrorists are tiny minority.but all muslims believe that quran is the supreme.we are waiting for mad trump to force us to denounce this belief for him to see what will follow then.we are eager to see that mad trump make such attemp to take him by suprise.we will render all the nukes and other weapons in possession of enemies of the quran ineffective.that is the newest technology supported by our intensive supplications.

    • Richie says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 7:05 pm

      Go back to screwing your goats, you are delusional

    • Keith Gilbert says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 pm

      Gosh, I for one certainly hope you keep to that ignorant islamic shit, make that pig shit, because every time anyone with a brain hears or sees it their eyes are open to the evil face of evil, islam!

    • ElderlyZionist says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 7:25 pm

      Dear ibrahim. The shattered corpses of your friends are burning in the desert tonight. I am so glad you haven’t joined them yet. You have so much to experience. I will miss you, little fellow.

    • Champ says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 7:40 pm

      “ibrahim itace muhammed” wrote:

      emhotep, you are just dreaming, kufr is already dead in turkey like kemal ataturk(may allah curse him).

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      Wow only an evil mohammedan like “ibrahim itace muhammed” would *pray a curse* on someone else. Very telling, eh? Yeah islam produces very bad fruit …

      “By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?” — Matthew 7:16

      • Norger says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 9:26 pm

        Attaturk nearly pulled Turkey out of the darkness of Islamic fundamentalism. Erdoğan is dragging Turkey back to the 7th century.

        • quota raven says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 9:54 pm

          to Norger, who points out, “Erdoğan is dragging Turkey back to the 7th century.”

          Yes, Norger, and he’s doing so out in the open and at a pretty fast clip.

          Cheers!

          quota raven

      • Debi Brand says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 5:19 am

        ” ‘By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?'” — Matthew 7:16, cited Champ.

        Indeed, ibrahim itace muhammed; thus we note in the vileness you regularly spew here, from the vile vileness spews forth.

    • Katnis says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:07 pm

      You seem like you are excited to find an opportunity to incite violence and destroy lives. Don’t you see? Your words are *exactly* why people want to get rid of “radical islam” from the world?

      • Norger says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 9:31 pm

        Which is exactly why free speech works. If America truly learns what Islam in fact teaches, Islam will be confronted and defeated.

    • eur says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:42 pm

      Your repressed homosexual orientation makes you act like an alpha islamic male. In addition to being a theocratic religious fanatic you can see that you are a repressed, unhappy person. Being homosexual is not a bad thing, denying that you are … is insane. Make up, dress with skirts and heels. We support you Ibrahim.

    • no_one says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:28 pm

      The religion of devil is called Islam. Americans should follow American law, not sharia. Whoever wants to follow sharia should go to Saudi Arabia.

      • boakai ngombu says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 10:10 am

        we must outlaw SHARIA, prohibit even minor observance “because it’s culture”

        • ECAW says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 10:16 am

          Even the bits about which foot to enter the toilet with? Shouldn’t we only be concerned about those bits which contradict the host country’s laws and those bits which claim supremacy over non-Muslims?

    • t. says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:35 pm

      “as muslims believe that the quran is supreme words of god, terrorism will remain; because terrorists are the main stream in islam.it is a lie,terrorists are tiny minority.”

      ibrahim, after reading the above, you lost any remnants of any kind of respect that may have been still there, in me, for you!

      It’s only one of two possibilities- either you’re trying to deceive the readers of your comment, which will never happen on this site, or you’re completely delirious, have a split personality and/or completely ignorant about your so-called religion, that which can be accurately described as an evil cult on a massive scale.

    • billybob says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:37 pm

      “Terrorists are tiny minority.” Muhammad himself was a terrorist, and he is “the perfect example” for Muslims. All Muslims believe he is the perfect example so all Muslims condone terrorism.

      Ibrahim – before you get all excited because I called your idol a terrorist, I ask you to to view him from the perspective of the Jewish tribe of Arabia at the time of Muhammad, or view him from the perspective of the Bedouin tribes he conquered as well. These people, whether Jewish or Bedouin, had their life, their traditions, and their culture for centuries before the warlord Muhammad came marauding. Think of the thousands he killed, the women he raped, the possession he pillaged, the weeping and gnashing of teeth. One day they had a life, and the next day they were slaves, or dying wounded, or dead. This was unconscionable! Muhammad was truly an evil man.

    • billybob says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:42 pm

      Good luck with that Ibrahim.

    • bernie says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 10:24 pm

      “The bulk of the Shariah–apart from the 5 basic pillars of Islam–is merely the legal opinion of a committee of Sunni legislators who constructed it in a certain time and place.”
      (Ziauddan Sardar, a Muslim intellectual in Britain)

    • FYI says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:47 am

      ‘@Ibrahim

      “All muslims believe the quran is supreme” you say.Supreme?
      The quran doesn’t even… agree with God’s Commandments.That’s how pathetic your book is.
      If all muslims believe the quran is supreme and the quran contains teachings that violate God’s Commandments then the quran isn’t terribly supreme is it?

      And it was quite nice to see a prayer service at the inauguration with a Jewish rabbi and Christian clergy
      invoking the guidance of the True God,the Heavenly Father.
      And not the antiChristisn,antiJewish,Commandment-ignoring islamic “allah”(or ..baal).
      For your islamic”allah” is an insult to Almighty God.
      The God of Moses,Elijah and Jesus Christ.The God of the commandments:Our Heavenly Father.

      There is One God and He has spoken through many prophets.
      mahomet wasn’t one of them.
      islam will not win against the True God.

    • LouiseM. says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 10:10 am

      ibrahim.i don’t know how you got so many replies.i refuse to try to decipher your sloppy post turned into gibberish by default of capital letters and space between your sentences.you will not hear from me anymore.bye.

    • Anne Smith says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 1:18 pm

      What a load of useless waffle.

    • Susette says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 7:57 pm

      “but all muslims believe that quran is the supreme.we are waiting for mad trump to force us to denounce this belief for him to see what will follow then”

      Hahaha…LOL…Your hallucinations are funny to me, by now, you are probably being investigated by the FBI for your threats. If you live in one of those dismal muslim-majority countries, perhaps you are safe. Come to America and you are doomed.

      The koran is only supreme in Dante’s 8th circle of Hell where mohammed resides: “muhammad and his cousin and son-in-law Ali (the fourth Rightly-Guided Caliph of Islam) in the eighth circle of Hell, a circle that punishes the fraudulent – those guilty of deliberate, knowing evil.” Yep, there’s your prophet and his unholy koran! Burn, baby, burn…

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 10:49 pm

      Appalling apologist for Muslim savagery ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:

      clueless (sic) mad devil trump (sic) has not been specific as to who are these radical islamic (sic) terrorists.if (sic) he means all those who believe in political islam (sic) or that sharia shall govern their entire life even if they do not engage in any act of terrorism will be fought by the united (sic) states (sic), then all muslims (sic) will be confronted by devil trump (sic) govt.if (sic) that is what mad devil trump (sic) means, then from today we declare war against barbaric trump (sic) and his allies in evil.
      …………………………….

      We all know that muhammed fails to consider such matters as conquering the West, forcing Christians to convert to Islam, stoning women to death, and murdering gay people and apostates to be terrorism–all things he has advocated–so this is all meaningless.

      And Muslims declare war against anyone who fails to submit to Islam.

      More:

      emhotep (sic), a kafir ,said (sic) those to be fought should include erdogan (sic) to restor (sic) atheist secularism to turkey.emhotep (sic), you are just dreaming, kufr (sic) is already dead in turkey (sic) like kemal (sic) ataturk(may (sic) allah (sic) curse him).mad (sic) trump (sic) cannot do that job for you the agents of the devil.
      …………………………….

      In other words, Turkey has reverted to a vicious Muslim hell hole, just like Afghanistan and Somalia.

      More:

      sharia (sic) defenders will emerge victorious at the end in this mighty confrontation. we (sic) will start in the name of allah (sic). mr (sic) spencer (sic) said as long as muslims (sic) believe that the quran (sic) is supreme words of god, terrorism will remain; because terrorists are the main stream (sic) in islam.it (sic) is a lie,terrorists (sic) are tiny minority.but (sic) all muslims (sic) believe that quran (sic) is the supreme.we (sic) are waiting for mad trump (sic) to force us to denounce this belief for him to see what will follow then.we (sic) are eager to see that mad trump (sic) make such attemp (sic) to take him by suprise (sic).
      …………………………….

      The only thing muhammed considers “terrorism” is Muslims who declare that Muslims like himself are “insufficiently Islamic”–but he is fine with murdering any Muslims that *he* considers “insufficiently Islam”–this is quite common.

      And of course Trump is not going to force anyone to denounce the Qur’an–but he may well come down on those who put its vicious diktats into practice by waging violent Jihad against us.

      More:

      we (sic) will render all the nukes and other weapons in possession of enemies of the quran (sic) ineffective.that (sic) is the newest technology supported by our intensive supplications.
      …………………………….

      Well, this is hilarious–now muhammed believes that “intensive supplications” to Allah render nuclear weapons ineffective? And note that he considers this headbanging to be “technology”. No wonder Muslim countries are so abysmally backward.

      Given some of the other things he believes–such as all Americans being born in “baby factories” and that Trump decreed that all women appear in the nude at this inauguration, this latest idiocy should not surprise.

  16. Richie says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 7:04 pm

    First off, declare CAIR a terrorist group. Secondly Robert Spencer needs to be hired to inform and educate the government on the realities of Islam

    • Katnis says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:09 pm

      I’m not sure he’s a fan of Robert Spencer. However, I think there is a chance that he may come to appreciate some of his work. Time shall tell.

    • Vic says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:36 pm

      Aye! Aye!
      How about DJT forming a forum of counsellors who have for years indefatigably kept the truth about Islam in front of our eyes, at their own personal loss and peril–Robert Spencer, Hugh Fitzgerald, David Horowitz, Jamie Glazov, Frank Gaffney, Brigit Gabriel, Anni Cyrus, Giulio Meotti, Raymond Ibrahim, David Wood, Jay Smith, Christine Williams, Nonie Darwish, Sebastian Gorka and many others I can’t remember now.
      We could start by delegitimizing Mohammed stories (newer research puts his birthplace in Petra, rather than Mecca) and the Koran…new information tells us that it was written and re-interpreted by his followers at least 1-2 centuries later. See Tom Holland’s new research.
      IMHO, I believe that if one reads the Bible and sees how God has dealt over the ages with His people, Israel, we can learn some lessons. He used pagan empires to deal with His apostate children to teach them a pragmatic lesson. If you follow other gods, I will let them overtake you. But, if you follow Me, I will bless you.
      Today’s hordes of Islam (that we call immigrants with unknowable numbers of jihadis) are the same as the Babylonians, the Assyrians and the Mongols. They worship foreign gods and are enemies of Our God. If we sit on the sidelines and watch them hit on Israel and we do nothing, then let’s not be surprised to find the hordes storming Europe as well as our land, destroying us with their terrorism in the same way. God is just allowing us to have a taste of what Israel goes through on a daily basis.
      Remember, “I will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you.”

      • Demsci says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 2:15 pm

        Excellent forum choices. Love your suggestion to expose the blatant untruth of Islam through historical examination.

        An intelligent approach by the Trump administration could be to experiment with a tough approach towards Muslims based on both their choice of religion in democratic countries and the teachings if that religion and the practices of it’s followers world wide.

        AND after the pressure has been increased to try also another tactic; that of, yes, attempting to convert many Muslims out of Islam by exposing it’s historical and other weaknesses publicly.

        Historically as Jay Smith and Tom Holland, Dan Gibsen (he from the qibla pointing to Petra instead of Mecca in the beginning) do and in explaining Mohammed’s teachings in finer and mercilessly clear detail, as David Wood is doing so masterfully now.

        Those whom we persuade to convert out of Islam will be no longer a problem, will they? By and large their genes are OK!

  17. David says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 7:06 pm

    Hale the new President (Trump)!

    • billybob says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:39 pm

      We welcome our new overlord Trump!

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 10:53 pm

        The American president is not an “overlord”.

  18. Richie says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 7:07 pm

    Will this inspire Europe to wake the hell up? Sweden is in its death throes

    • Sam says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 1:08 pm

      I am of the opinion that Sweden is a lost cause. However miracles happen. Look we have Trump as president.

      Europeans should fight against Islam themselves. We Americans should (hopefully) show the world how to defeat Islam by border control,mosque control, campus control by encouraging free speech indicating how evil Islam is. Stop muslim immigration and discourage Islamic activities.

  19. Richie says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 pm

    Inspired by Winston Churchill, when he said:

    “We cannot see how deliverance will come or when it will come, but nothing is more certain that every trace of Hitler’s footsteps, every stain of his infected, corroding fingers will be sponged and purged and, if need be, blasted from the surface of the earth.”

    I hope the similar scourge of radical Islam can also be blasted away from the surface of the earth

    • ElderlyZionist says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 7:27 pm

      Amen.

      Get ready for it, ibrahim.

    • Vic says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:38 pm

      Amen and Amen!

    • eur says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:44 pm

      Radical islam? islam itself is radical.

      • JawsV says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 8:59 pm

        It’s redundant. It’s like saying a “carnivorous lion.” Hopefully he’ll start saying “Islamic Terrorism” and drop the redundant “radical.”

        • Daniel Triplett says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 2:56 am

          I’d like him to just say Islam, and refer to this as the “Islamic War.”

  20. Wellington says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 7:29 pm

    Eradicating “radical Islamic terrorism” must eventually entail comprehending that “radical Islamic terrorists” are representatives of Islam at its “best.” Short of this truth being realized, and optimally very publicly pronounced, only tactical victories here and there will occur unless the putrid Islamic faith in its ENTIRETY is condemned. Trump represents a positive step in this direction to be sure, but only a step, though after the many backward steps taken by his predecessor his rhetoric on this most crucial of matters remains inspiring.

    But it is still not enough. Not by a long shot since Islam, all of it, has wrong written all over it.

    Still a long road ahead if the West is to preserve itself from the ugly totalitarianism and parasite which is Islam. Still a very long road ahead. I do wax optimistic like but only barely so because Islam, ALL OF IT, has not yet been called out by any Western leader for the monstrosity which it is.

    • Norger says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 9:34 pm

      You’re one of the best posters here Mr. Wellington.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 11:06 pm

        Hear, hear!

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 3:21 am

      @Wellington

      I wrote to you a couple of days ago, in response to your post to me, but most of my posts on that thread were deleted. I came off the top rope on another poster, who shall remain nameless; doesn’t matter anyway. I went blood sport on him, and wasn’t being much of a gentleman about it.

      Anyway, in reply to your post—

      Wellington says
      January 17, 2017 at 5:05 pm

      Thank you for your reply, Daniel. You laid out your case very well. Here is mine.

      First, Islam must be identified as a negative. No more games about radical Islam versus Islam or Islamism versus Islam. I know you think this is too soon. I don’t. Can’t fight an enemy if you’re concerned about naming it. Trump, you know, said as much during the primaries last March when he stated, “I think Islam hates us.” He didn’t say radical Islam hates us or some Muslim hate us. Nope. He said what I quoted. Here you and I disagree. You still want to wait awhile before the truth is told about Islam. I don’t. Put the Islamic world on notice that we think their religion sucks and is totally incompatible with such things as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and equality under the law.

      Second, move as much to energy independence as possible. Trump will do this. Alternative energy sources can be explored but no pie-in-the sky rot. Get off of Middle Eastern oil as much as possible. Here I don’t think we will have a disagreement.

      Third, ally with various Eastern European states. They are far more trustworthy than Russia.. And if you add up the collective military might of these states like Poland, Hungary, etc. they do not equal something negligible. Besides, and you yourself stated on this thread, Russia has loads of internal problems, including many broken down military elements. Hell, I’ve seen where perhaps as much as 50% of the Russian military are alcoholics. Moreover, as Tom Clancy noted, your average Russian soldier can’t do much at all——drive a truck, fix something that is broken (the example Clancy gave here is that if something breaks on a US submarine nine times out of ten the guy fixing it will be an enlisted man; on a Russian sub it will almost always be an officer because the enlisted don’t know much), etc. Oh, I don’t mean we should be actually hostile to Russia. Work with them to the extent we can but we must let Putin know that he can no longer get away with the shit he has (e.g., annexing the Crimea, which went against all norms of international law, and which no President of the US should ever recognize).

      5) Stop further Muslim immigration to the West. Find whatever legal pretext to do so and do it. Also, deport any Muslim who violates Western law in the name of Islam. If the violation is a violent one, execute the bastard or lock him up for life, preferably the former.

      6) Put Muslims on notice that they have been had and encourage them to leave Islam. This of course can be very dangerous for many Muslims, which itself functions as a huge black mark against Islam, but it should be tried and programs put in place to insure safe havens for such ex-Muslims.

      7) By all means, work with Putin as much as possible, as I already mentioned in point three, but demonstrate to him (and to the Chinese) that we will always deal with him from a position of strength. If he pouts and does bad things, punish him with truly onerous economic sanctions.

      8) Do what we can to bring Western European nations to their senses about Islam. Endorse people like Geert Wilders and let the current crop of Western leaders (and the EU) that they are dhimmi fools (you don’t have to call them as such but let them know that we think they are weak, wrong and horribly hurting their own nations). In short, America must lead again because the world is messed up and without a strong America it only ever gets worse. Obama has never understood this. He never will. Reagan clearly understood this. So does Trump I believe.

      Well, this is just an outline of what I would want to happen. Thank you for the exchange and again thank you for your service.

      Daniel Triplett says
      January 19, 2017 at 2:04 am

      @Wellington/17JAN2017/5:05 PM

      Thanks for your reply sir. I’m happy to respond.

      First:

      I must have misspoken when I proposed we all play the “Radical” Islam game with a TMOE hijacking a great religion.

      I’m totally on board with you. Aside from the seven Kaffir nuke Heads of State who’ve not yet allied nor developed a war plan, preparing to win WWIII quickly, I believe every human on the planet should call out “Islam” as the satanic criminal enterprise it is. No word games with prefixes or suffixes, just Islam. I’ve believed this for decades.

      Regarding Trump, I heard the quote to which you referred, “I think Islam hates us.” And I’ve never been more proud of the man.

      I don’t think he’s since raised his opinion of Muslims, however, perhaps because of a logic like the logic I surmise of the Heads of State, President Trump has since walked back his remarks a bit. I’ve heard him use “just the criminal Muslims we need to keep out.” And, “there are plenty of good, peaceful Muslims.” This has been disappointing, but I’m hoping it’s just a rhetorical strategy against the Ummah until he has time to prepare for the Big Fight.

      And you probably heard him say “radical Islam” at the Inauguration today. However, that he aims to “eradicate it from the Earth,” is a blessing from God.

      Second:

      I go back and forth about the energy thing. Let me say unequivocally, we must exploit and develop 100% of our energy. But when do we want to do it (when do we want to blow our wad?) With the Alliance, we must force an embargo against ALL Muslim oil. Because if we don’t buy Saudi oil, but someone else does, then what have we gained?

      There’s only so much oil in the Earth. This may be a reason to #1. Use all their oil first, which leaves the Kaffir with the only remaining oil. OR (maybe better) #2. Let’s just take their oil.

      I’ve read estimates of between 40 years of traditional oil remaining, to as much as 200 years, if we include the much more expensive to develop shale oil.

      Why is it “Muslim” oil? Because by accident of geology it’s underneath their feet?

      The West discovered it.

      The West extracted it.

      The West developed it.

      None of which the Muslims could ever have done on their own.

      They’d still be living in tents, pissing in the sand were it not for the West.

      To them, it’s all jizya, and it’s funding the massive expansion of Islam and construction of mosques/madrasas Worldwide.

      Why would we want people who seek our extermination to be in control of a commodity we need for our survival?

      Moreover, we’re in a World War we didn’t start. The people with 2/3 of the oil want us dead. All’s fair in love and war. So let’s take the oil. There’s only so much of it, and it’s going to be a Mad Max scenario when the wells run dry.

      Ought not the oil belong to those who can defend it, versus those who happen to be standing on it…the same principle used to violently take our house lots from the native-Americans who formerly owned it, so that we may live there? That’s the way the World has ALWAYS worked. It’s human nature, and there’s not a thing wrong with that. Ask the Alpha-male lion how it works too: The strongest survive, and the pride belongs to the Alpha.

      Third:

      I agree with most of what you say.

      But, here’s what Russia has that Eastern Bloc states don’t: Nuclear Weapons. And that’s a huge difference.

      The nuclear fraternity is the most coveted in the World, because the 7 Kaffir states who belong to it are essentially immune from attack, and get to make the rules for the rest of the World. That’s why every nation wants to belong to this very exclusive club.

      My off-the-charts left-wing only (younger) brother once said to me, after telling him as a USAF Officer I’d have no hesitation launching a nuke strike on a city after spending four-seconds confirming the POTUS code, “Hey Dan, what right do we have telling N Korea what they can do? They’re a sovereign state. They can do whatever they want. We have nukes. What right do we have telling them or anyone else they can’t have nuke weapons too?”

      Then I had to explain to him, in a huge argument, “Jason, it’s never been about what’s fair. It’s about what’s best for America. That’s the way it’s always been, and always will be, and you’d better thank God your military believes that.”

      You’re probably right about Crimea, were we to be fair and righteous. Personally though, I don’t think hostile action with Russia over Crimea is worth destroying our relationship with Russia for what really matters: Winning WWIII. I hope you too can see that winning the Islamic War, the biggest war the World has ever faced, isn’t going to happen without a strong Russian alliance. Could we win it without them? Sure. But it would be a lot more difficult, and many Westerners and Americans would die, versus little or none with a Russian Alliance.

      To me, the choice is easy. Crimea (and Ukraine) are small ball. Within 10 years time, the National boundaries on that side of the planet will be dramatically redrawn anyway.

      If the Ukrainians had been storming Omaha Beach with us, perhaps I’d feel differently.

      Fourth:

      (You forgot a fourth)

      Fifth:

      I believe we agree on this. Islam is a criminal enterprise dressed up as a religion. We’re not required to tolerate it. No one could start Islam today. If Muhammad were alive today, he’d be on Death Row in a SuperMax.

      How do you deport Muslim citizens? Even if we could, how does Containment protect us from ICBMs, nuke on a container ship, or nuke in a U-Haul driven into Times Square?

      My solution: Forced Worldwide criminalization of Islam, making its “practice or promotion” a capital offense.

      Sixth:

      Great idea.

      I’m not convinced, however, that Muslims refrain from Apostasy for fear of punishment.

      Otherwise, why doesn’t every al-hijrah Muslim apostatize the moment he sets foot in Europe or N America, where they’re protected by our Western laws? They don’t.

      And why don’t Western Muslimas envy our Western women and divorce their husbands (owners). They don’t.

      I believe most all Muslims truly buy into that evil.

      Seventh:

      Agreed, but I believe the economic sanctions are laughable and useless against them.

      Eighth:

      Agree with all. Consider this though: Let’s say we convince every Kaffir on Earth tomorrow that Islam is evil and must be extinguished. Will that change the minds of any Ummah? No.

      So then what? My point: Violence on a shock-and-awe Biblical scale is unavoidable.

      War is a Battle of Wills. The first side losing the Will to Fight loses the war.

      The Ummah won’t be talked out of this. We must scare the shit out of them with incremental, random nuke strikes to break their Will to Fight.

      Won’t happen any other way, IMHO.

      Thanks once again for the acknowledgement of my service. Best, yet toughest years of my life by far. I so wish I was younger to do it all over again.

      Stay strong Brother. I always learn from your posts. You’re a scholar and a Gentleman.

      • Wellington says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 3:52 pm

        Thank you, Daniel, for your detailed reply. I see we agree on many things. I also see that you think massive martial conflict is unavoidable. I’m not sure of this but it is certainly possible if not probable.

        As for Russia having nukes, I look at this almost as a technicality. They’re not going to use them against us and we’re not going to use them against them. One Cuban Missile Crisis is enough and I think both sides get this. Besides, Putin is a bastard but he’s not a crazy bastard. As with so many previous Russian leaders, the one thing he understands and respects is force. So, America must be forceful to the point where we don’t piss him off enough to do something terrible. This of course calls for delicate judgment. Yes, we should try to work with him but we must never trust him nor let him think that he is so valuable to us that we dare not oppose him.

        And of course he will test Trump soon enough, just as the Chinese will, to see how tough he is. I strongly suspect Trump will be quite tough. Hope so. Better be. And I do believe economic sanctions against Russia can have the desired effect should we have to go to that option because in so many ways Russia is a third world nation and its economy is horribly and stupidly not diversified nearly enough. America economically easily has the upper hand where Russia is concerned and we should not refrain from invoking that advantage if Russia behaves badly beyond a certain point (N.B., Russia will always behave badly until it “gets” freedom and it never has gotten freedom, only the degree of bad behavior thus being a variable).

        On the specific matter of Crimea, which is truly an egregious taking on Russia’s part, we don’t have to go to war over it but we can do what America did back in 1940 when Stalin took over Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, to wit, never recognize such annexation. We went through the entire Cold War and dealt many times with the USSR but we stuck to our guns about the Baltic states and that’s what we should do with Crimea. If Putin doesn’t like this, tough.

        As for oil, I find it highly instructive that we keep locating more of it. I saw one article which asserted that we have tapped, at most, only 20% of the earth’s oil supply (Remember Jimmy Carter saying when he was President the world was going to run out of oil by 2000?). I figure by the time we really do run out of oil we will by then have synthetic fuels that will take its place. And I’m not sure about forcing others into not buying Saudi oil, Muslim oil. We can encourage other states to do that but a highly developed nation like Japan has virtually no oil (or hardly any other major natural resources) and must buy it somewhere. This is a tricky one since we want allies but we simply can’t tell them what to do. Besides, America alone being energy independent, a distinct possibility if we have the will, would still cripple the Saudis et al. but best of all it would enable us to act with even greater boldness; we would have far more leverage geopolitically as well as economically. The less America needs from the rest of the world the better. In any case, not exactly sure how to proceed here on this oil matter except that America must do everything it can to be self-sufficient.

        Just taking the oil of Muslim states that have it would definitely mean outright war. Could make the Gulf War and Iraqi War look like small potatoes. Not sure I want to go this route unless absolutely necessary and right now I don’t see it as that. I rather think we must let the rich Muslim states (rich because of oil which as you said the Mohammedans on their own would have never figured out how to extract) know we’re the boss and they must accede to our wishes. There are numerous diplomatic, economic, military hardware, etc. options we should explore before outright war. But if it comes to this, then so be it.

        Deportation would be limited to the worst Muslims and perhaps we could make deals with certain Muslim states to take them if in return we gave them certain things, such as some military equipment. Conversely, if Muslim states won’t take the worst Muslims in then we restrict things for them even more. I don’t want to emphasize this whole deportation matter too much. It would be marginal and nothing truly extensive. As for encouraging Muslims to give up Islam, I think it’s worth a try but of course this could only occur AFTER we very publicly identify Islam for the barbaric fraud which it is. Not much downside here I would argue, though we should remain quite realistic about the number of Muslims who would defect, but I do believe that Islam is now under a kind of scrutiny that it has never been before and that it will not be able to stand up to this scrutiny, and since it is so awful I remain somewhat optimistic that a mass exodus from Islam could actually occur over the next several decades. 50/50 here.

        I don’t believe we have to criminalize Islam in America (assuming we could, which constitutionally speaking would be deuce difficult, to put it mildly) anymore than we criminalized Nazism during WWII or Communism during the Cold War. But identifying Islam properly as a giant negative must occur and thereafter Muslims will be looked upon as losers, confused human beings, fools, etc. and then the social ostracism will set in which will allow Islam to remain legal but never respected and thus only existing on the margins of society. In fact, if this doesn’t occur, if we continue indefinitely to play what I call the Great Pretend Game (GPG), i.e., that Islam is fine and it’s just that some radical version of it isn’t and is a betrayal of the good, noble and peaceful religion founded by Mohammed, then NOTHING above that I have written will do much good at all. The corner of corners that must be turned, and turned soon, is that ALL of Islam be identified as the spiritual totalitarianism which it is and there is no reforming any totalitarian ideology. Also, such a stance on Islam would then allow us to find some legal pretext to end Muslim immigration.

        Dangerous world. Bastards and crazies everywhere. All the more reason America must lead because when it doesn’t the world only gets worse, as it has under the worst President in American history, Barack Obama. And imagine a world without America. It would be, as Mark Steyn has said, a world that would be subject to the tyrants of the earth.

        You know, “all” a polity needs to be optimally successful are four things: 1) freedom, 2) capitalism, 3) a proper moral foundation. and 4) an enlightened legal system. If even one of these four are missing, expect trouble. When all four are missing, as they are in the Islamic world, expect disaster. I would close here by asserting that a new containment policy must be put into place by the West with America leading the West. Perhaps Trump will do this and do to Islam what Truman did to Communism——-begin the containment of it. Then a few decades later, assuming we’re still around, another President in the mold of a Ronald Reagan will move from containment to outright winning. This is my vision long term. Hope it becomes a reality. Had better or the world will enter into the darkest of dark ages ever.

        Good to have this back and forth with you. Take good care, Daniel. And please keep posting at JW because you have a lot of valuable, challenging and provocative things to say.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:04 pm

        Great exchange, Daniel and Wellington.

    • Debi Brand says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 5:23 am

      Amen, Wellington. Once more, laying facts to the line.

    • Angemon says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 6:40 am

      +1

    • t. says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 2:59 pm

      “Eradicating “radical Islamic terrorism” must eventually entail comprehending that “radical Islamic terrorists” are representatives of Islam at its “best.” Short of this truth being realized, and optimally very publicly pronounced, only tactical victories here and there will occur unless the putrid Islamic faith in its ENTIRETY is condemned”

      Perfectly and brilliantly said, Wellington! Now this fundamental truth should be transmitted to all world governments and its heads.

    • epistemology says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 10:52 pm

      You hit the spot as usual dear friend, I once put it this way way Islam is a disease worse than cancer, AIDS and Ebola combined. Islam has been the evil of mankind from the moment it emerged from the tents of some loony Arabs who wanted to have a monotheism of their own.

      As you said, no Western leader has named Islam the monstrosity that it is, hope Geert Wilders will become a European leader one day, he names it.Thank you once again for your succinct and insightful comments.

      All the best to you and yours my friend take care

  21. William says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 7:55 pm

    Many things will be needed to defeat Islam, including the use of the military. But as Sebastian Gorka has noted, Jihad needs to be delegitimized. The political ideology of Islam must be countered using a massive information campaign, via social media and others, to destroy its appeal to the Mohammedans. It must be discredited like nazism and communism.

    • common sense says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:03 pm

      No doubt about that.

  22. Islam_Macht_Frei says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 8:09 pm

    “radical Islamic terrorism” is just a euphemism for “Islam”

  23. common sense says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 8:11 pm

    Temporarily increase the enlistment age up to 50 years old and get the politics out of the way. Give us one path and one task without hinderance. We would see our enemies dissapear quickly. I’m ready and I know there are a world full of team players out there ready to go. Why should the young be sent in harms way without us? Many of us have done what we need to do for those around us, it’s now enough let’s free the world from those barbarbarians. Now is the time.

  24. Mahendra Singh says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 8:19 pm

    An impossible task. Terror is generic to Islam, just like biting is natural to rattlesnakes.
    But certainly its eradication is possible in the USA under his leadership.

    • Vic says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:41 pm

      With God, nothing is impossible!

  25. Champ says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 8:22 pm

    Trump vows to “eradicate completely” “radical Islamic terrorism”

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    GO TRUMP!!!

  26. Richard Paulsen says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 8:44 pm

    Make America great again. Yes, we can. Europe too, I hope.

    • eur says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 8:46 pm

      Too late for us. Europe is doomed.

      • Richard Paulsen says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 8:50 pm

        No, never surrender.

        • quota raven says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 9:02 pm

          Richard Paulsen – who sez, “No, never surrender.”

          I agree, Richard. Always good to see you commenting here. Keep up the good work from Sweden. To surrender is to deny any control one has over one’s life and culture. It is wholly denying human choice. Submission is simply too appalling to contemplate.”

          Cheers!

          quota raven

        • FP says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 11:29 pm

          I see that at least one Viking heart still beats in Sweden.

      • JIMJFOX says

        Jan 20, 2017 at 9:55 pm

        Exactly what Islam is designed to do- terrorise you into surrender. Europe has been in far worse conditions until the defeat of Islam in France, Spain, Italy & most of the states of Europe in the 14& 1500’s. It can and WILL happen again but first you must rid yourselves of the Appeasers and Sympathisers.

        • Richard Paulsen says

          Jan 20, 2017 at 10:27 pm

          Thank you. Right.

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 3:01 am

        Plenty of options still for Europe.

        Including but not limited to criminalization of the “practice or promotion” of Islam, making it a capital offense.

        If it gets bad enough Martial Law is an option too. Declare an all out war on the Seditionists. The good guys have most all the guns in Europe.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:07 pm

        We stand with European patriots, eur. Please don’t give up!

  27. Ren says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 8:47 pm

    What a difference with Dumbama! What a lovely change!

  28. Jaladhi says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 9:43 pm

    Great goal but how!!

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 11:27 pm

      Bit by bit.

      Starting with the US homeland. Secure and ‘clear’ that, first.

      Starting with banning the Muslim Brotherhood and evicting it and all of its identifiable operatives OUT of the USA. Identifying, surprise-raid-and-searching, shutting down, and razing, all Muslim Brotherhood-associated mosques. And raid-and-search *any* mosque that a known jihad plotter or attacker (whether foiled, failed, or ‘achieved’) ever attended; and shut it down permanently if anything ‘dodgy’ is uncovered by the search.
      ‘
      Further possible measures?

      Investigate and kick out Fethulla Gulen and ALL of the network and operatives *he* has established. Turn the forensic accountants loose on his finances in the USA….

      Raid all the “Muslims of the Americas” compounds/ aka military bases, and shut *them* down, permanently – raze to the ground, seize assets.

      This is a war, and the first thing that needs to be dealt with, and cut right down to size, removed bit by bit by bit, is the Fifth Column, the colony that the Ummah has established within the gates.

      Wall to the south to stop jihadis ‘blending in’ amongst non-Muslim Mexicans etc.

      Ban all Muslim immigration. ‘

      Evict all non-citizen Mohammedans, beginning with the known criminals and the fraudulent and the inciters of Jihad.

      Cut off ALL Mohammedan-country funding of *any* American place of education. Put the Islamophile treacherous dawa-peddling likes of John Esposito out of a job.

      That’s just a few ideas, right there.

      Then moving on to *other* Islamic entities, one by one by one.

      • Demsci says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 2:33 pm

        What the many leftists, political corrects and also many fence-sitters, young “novices in politics” could fail to understand is the WHY of this. And not merely NOT understand, they will TWIST it too and present those measures in a very bad light, as if a Trump Administration doing this is “racist, fascist”.

        So PR about the WHY a Trump administration might do this seems essential to me. With many elements in it, and especially with a few essential WHY’s; first the positive WHY, a comprehensive PR broadcasting in favor of Democratic patriotism, Democratic values, the whole Ideology. So that detractors can no longer creditably emphasize how anti-Islam measure are only hateful oppressive “anti-Muslim-prejudices and measures, painting the Muslims with a broad brush” but in defense of that Democratic system.

        And second of course all these explanations of Islamic texts and tenets and how hundreds of millions of Muslims interpret and practice them, in this profound anti-Democratic way.

        I think it is important to continually emphasize the contrast, even if it seems like stating the obvious and boring.

        • Jaladhi says

          Jan 21, 2017 at 8:48 pm

          >”And second of course all these explanations of Islamic texts and tenets and how hundreds of millions of Muslims interpret and practice them, in this profound anti-Democratic way.”<

          The problem is "hundreds of millions of Muslims" do not understand or interpret Quran by themselves – they rely on the mosque imam to interpret Quran passages to them. They totally believe their imams, mullahs, sheikhs,.. or who ever is the cult leader as these guys are the direct pipe line of allah to them. And you what these imams are going to teach them!! There is no chance that any alternative explanation of Quran verses are possible. But the funny thing is the same mullahs while talking to a non-Muslim questioning the meaning will obfuscate the meaning for them and will never admit that meaning of the word "murder" in any verse is murder. They will always bring out their inner taqiyya mode to lie about it.

          And these are same imams who lead their millions of Muslim flocks.

  29. billybob says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 9:52 pm

    I thought you folks might find this article interesting…

    Hillary Clinton Aide Huma Abedin Wears All Black to the Inauguration
    https://www.yahoo.com/style/hillary-clintons-aide-huma-abedin-wears-funeral-attire-to-inauguration-210632676.html

    The picture itself is worth a thousand words. If there ever was a woman more thoroughly defeated.. after Weiner’s betrayal, and after sharing defeat with Hillary.. this poor woman is in mourning for all that could have been for her but never was, poor thing.

    • Cecilia Ellis says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 10:38 pm

      Wow, Billybob! What a stark contrast. Also, did you notice that she was wearing sunglasses … ? She really does look sad.

    • Demsci says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 2:42 pm

      Interesting. Logically, from her viewpoint she is devastated. But why doesn’t she lay the blame for her huge disappointment with her betting on the wrong horse? Why doesn’t she blame Islam for being a much rejected religion? With good reasons. Ditching Islam can give her a new great start in life, she is still young and very pretty!

  30. citycat says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 10:59 pm

    Radical Islãmic Terrorism is the symptom of an earlier illness which was committee to verse via the Qur’an writers.
    Who knows who they are?
    Who would have written about the writers of the Qur’an?
    Trump referred to God as the Creator for ALL.
    Sure, in theory.
    But no religion will agree with another that they have the same God, because if so then all the prophets, except at most one, are lying.
    So no God joy there.
    If i see a mosque, a synagogue, a church, a hindu temple, a sikh temple, a buddhist temple, a satanic temple, all in a line next to each other in the high street, what a laugh that will be, tourists might even visit.

  31. dumbledoresarmy says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 11:30 pm

    Dear American jihadwatchers

    do not lose a moment to share with the 45th president the insights of the sixth president, John Quincy Adams.

    It is instructive to remember that Adams was *also* America’s first ambassador to…RUSSIA.

    His writings on the Russo-Turkish war, and on the Greek war of independence – the first being a war of self-defence by a Christian power (Russia) against its malevolently-aggressive and duplicitous Mohammedan neighbour, the Ottoman empire, and the second being a war of independence in which a subjugated and abused dhimmi nation rose up and threw off the iron yoke of its Muslim imperial oppressors – are marvels of lucidity.

    Adams hated and opposed slavery (he is one of the main characters in the story of the “Amistad” – remember the movie); he acted with decency toward Native Americans; it is no surprise, therefore, that he *also* understood exactly what Islam was all about, and how thoroughly horrible it was (and is), and he describes and condemns it in paragraphs of a ruthless clarity unmatched either before or after.

    His father, John Adams, had already had some pretty scathing – and perfectly truthful – things to say about Islam. Not ‘radical Islamic terrorism’. ISLAM. MOHAMMED.

    “…John Adams, in his report to Jay, wrote of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, and called him a “military fanatic” who “denies that laws were made for him; he arrogates everything to himself by force of arms.”” (from Keith Farrell’s, “What the Founders Thought About Islam, In Their Own Words”, as published online at ‘The Federalist Papers’ blogspot:

    http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/us/obama-claims-islam-part-of-founding-heres-what-our-founders-wrote-about-mussellmen

    Anyway, back to the formidable John Quincy Adams, whose name, and whose words, and example, Trump would do well to remember and publicly call to mind.

    Here is Andrew Bostom bringing to public notice, and discussing, what Adams said about Islam.

    http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=11283

    “JOHN QUINCY ADAMS KNEW JIHAD”

    By Andrew G. Bostom
    FrontPageMagazine.com | Wednesday, September 29, 2004

    Here, as cited at length within Bostom’s article, is John Quincy Adams, discussing Mohammed, and the cult that Mohammed founded.

    “…In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth.

    “Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle.

    “Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust, by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion.

    “He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy;

    ” **and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. ** {my emphasis – dda}

    “THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE. [Bostom indicates that the capitals are in Adams’ original. – dda]

    “Between these two religions [that is, between Christianity (which Adams had previously summarised, before describing Mohammed and Islam) and Islam – dda] thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged.

    “That war is yet flagrant; nor can it cease but by the extinction of that imposture, which has been permitted by Providence to prolong the degeneracy of man.

    “While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men…”.

    (I am reminded of the words of British PM William Gladstone who, some forty years after J Q Adams wrote these words, held up a copy of Koran in the House of Commons, declared it an “accursed” book, and stated that “so long as there is this book, there will be no peace on the earth”. – dda)

    And then, a bit further on, Adams sums up the whole business of jihad in one searing paragraph that Trump – along with all his homeland security and foreign affairs advisers, and his generals – would do well to commit to memory:

    “…The precept of the koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God.

    “The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute (i. e. the jizya – dda);
    ‘
    the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace (i.e. the hudna – dda);

    “and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective.

    “The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force ..”.

    (Imagine if every Infidel general, diplomat and politician, world-wide, were to take *that* summary of Islam, of its goals and its methods, seriously, and respond accordingly in order to defend themselves and their nations against the Jihad in all its multifarious forms. In order to repel any part of the Umman when it attacks, and to prevent any part of it from taking root in our midst. – dda)

    • PRCS says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 12:30 am

      “every Infidel general, diplomat and politician, world-wide, were to take *that* summary of Islam, of its goals and its methods, seriously, and respond accordingly in order to defend themselves and their nations against the Jihad”

      Their minds are like steel traps.

      The trick is to get them open.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 23, 2017 at 8:00 pm

      Great stuff, DDA–thanks.

  32. dumbledoresarmy says

    Jan 20, 2017 at 11:37 pm

    Those who wish may like to have the original reference for Adams’ essays in which he analyses and criticises Islam.

    “Unsigned essays dealing with the Russo-Turkish War, and on Greece, written while JQA was in retirement, before his election to Congress in 1830” [Chapters X-XIV (pp. 267-402) in The American Annual Register for 1827-28-29. New York, 1830.”

    The entire text has been digitised and can be read online at the following link:

    http://www.archive.org/stream/p1americanannual29blunuoft

    Imagine a speech, presented in Jerusalem, and in Moscow, and in New Delhi and in Mumbai, presented by an American president, that began and ended by quoting, with any sort of qualification or ‘watering down’ or beating about the bushes, what the deeply-learned and worldly-wise John Quincy Adams, one of America’s greatest diplomats and statesmen, had to say about.. Islam, Islam, Islam. Words that have not dated one iota.

    And that declared an implacable refusal to cede even one inch of ground to the advancing Jihad, and a determination to remove the Ummah’s deadly Fifth Column colonies, root and branch, from within the Lands of the Infidels, and to drive it back and contain it grimly within those lands it has already blighted with – as Adams put it – “desolation and delusion”.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Jan 20, 2017 at 11:39 pm

      Grr. Did not adequately proofread.

      Correction. For “…and ended by quoting, with any sort of qualification or ‘watering down’ or beating about the bushes”, read “…and ended by quoting, without any sort of qualification or ‘watering down’ or beating about the bushes..”.

      • John C. Barile says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 3:09 pm

        We knew what you meant to begin with, DDA; even without your proofreading and correction. Those who know you know. [I myself am wont to conceal unpleasant truths–to give them a softer edge–for fear of hostile scrutiny or regard for human respect.]

  33. Terry Gain says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 12:26 am

    A measure of how far we are removed from rationality is that we can’t say we want to eradicate Islamic terrorism, we have to limit ourselves to eradicating RADICAL Islamic terrorism.

    Islam is the scourge of the earth. Deal with it accordingly.

  34. dumbledoresarmy says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 12:52 am

    Here is what Sir Winston Churchill wrote, in his book “The River Wars”, that chronicled the British Empire’s campaign against the Mahdi in the Sudan (the “Islamic State” of that era), when it finally got going.

    “No terms but fight or death were offered.

    “No reparation or apology could be made. . .

    “The red light of retribution played on the bayonets and the lances, and civilization—elsewhere sympathetic, merciful, tolerant, ready to discuss or to argue, eager to avoid violence, to submit to law, to effect a compromise—here advanced with an expression of inexorable sternness, and rejecting all other courses, offered only the arbitration of the sword.”

    • dsinc says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 2:27 am

      Thanks dda, excellent comments, as always.

    • Michael Copeland says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 5:37 am

      “No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”
      Churchill
      Churchill on Islam: Wallet Cards – print your own
      http://www.libertygb.org.uk/news/churchill-islam-wallet-cards

  35. citycat says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 1:12 am

    Radical Islãmic terrorism could voluntarily vanish, as a directive from Islãm.
    The Muslims have to be only simply as nice as pie, and as accommodating as you like, and breed and be merry, and wait, and plot and plan.
    They may see themselves as the pilgrims on the Mayflower did.
    The Islãmic invasion remains, terror or no terror, the tide of Islãm vibrates in ebb, waiting, growing, waiting, growing, as ‘peaceful’ as you like, plotting, planning, smiling, lying.
    Allah is a mass of Muslim souls, the right catalyst may cause it to explode, releasing souls that will migrate somewhere.
    A new religion is due, i hear, every 7? hundred years.

    • LouiseM. says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 11:11 am

      Too bad this is true. The numbers make all the difference. And yes, they can wait, and plan, as they already did, and are still doing, all around the world…..
      Something has to be done to prevent another Obama finishing the job with his strong enough Islamist gang in the future.

      Agreements were signed with Islam by Western Governments. They should be made public, and undone.

      See ISESCO Strategy…In the Seventies, Islam wanted to come to the West to acquire the West’s knowledge and technologies, while pretending to bring in exchange, its oil, its cheap labor and … its ”moral superiority” to the West. They demanded that the Muslims living outside Islam be able to live there as if they were still in Islam.

      http://www.isesco.org.ma/the-islamic-cultural-action-outside-the-islamic-world/

  36. Richie says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 1:17 am

    I hope President Trump means this and is serious.

  37. More Ham Ed says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 2:20 am

    Trump vows to “eradicate completely” “radical Islamic terrorism”

    There will still be quite a few copies of the unholy ko ‘ran floating around.

    It won’t be possible to stop everyone from following the violent verses, which are obviously meant for current-day followers, because the overall theme doesn’t teach otherwise.

  38. duh swami says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:40 am

    President Trump will go for the throat , if he can find it…
    The first step toward eliminating terrorism is to stop using the word ‘radical;,,,when I hear kuffar use it, I know they don’t really understand Islam and then can’t really know the enemy…If you don’t know the enemy, you will underestimate the enemy, and you will lose…

    • JawsV says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 8:26 am

      Exactly, swami. The “radical” has got to go. It’s just Islam, Islamic Terrorism (Jihad). Now if Trump starts using “Jihad” that’s even better.

  39. vladkoval says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 5:40 am

    Yes!
    I hope the world is really on the verge of Big Change. The Real Change We Need.
    Make no mistake – it’s not only the muslims who are trembling now, but many other assholes, like Russia, and Ukraine too.
    Putin was sure Clinton wins. His brain didn’t go farther than the idea that he who controls the Media – he wins. He miscalculated.
    Now by inertia his propaganda machine is still singing Trump, but it’s hypocritically and temporarily. Putin knows that his establishment is incompatible with the Trump’s course. Here and there in Russia already some secondary Media (also run by Kremlin) start step by step taking anti-Trump stance. They are preparing the masses in Russia to the full-scale “antitrumpism”.
    As for the Trump’s dossier.
    I am 300% sure Putin has the video with the prostitutes. It’s a common trick of FSB – they trace every Westerner coming in Russia, let alone an American billionaire. Trump personally is not a monk. And the video 300% exists. But it doesn’t matter. That will not help Putin the pedophile who destroyed his own video with a kid, when he got to the power. Thanks god MI5 found out about it and warned that such thing can happen. Puttie is angry now. When he puts the video on YouTube it will not have the effect the wanted.
    Why Putin is against Trump?
    Because both Russian and Ukrainian corrupt establishments were sure that post-1991 era is never-ending. The era of which they benefited.
    It’s easy to play a “tough guy” pointing with the finger at the West (USA) saying – look, they all are “effeminate gays” there, and their leaders too (therefore I will rob you, put the stolen money in the Western banks and keep bullshitting you). But the party is over. I don’t know what exactly will be, but I know the big changes are inevitable.
    And hey libtards!
    Now you say Trump is Putin’s puppet?
    Since when you became so patriotic and anti-Russian?
    I remember what you told in 2014. You blindly believed everything what Putin told you through his propaganda outlets.
    That was enough to show you the idiots from Azov battalion, whos number is no more than 100 persons, and you screamed “Putin is right, He is fighting Nazis in Ukraine”!
    Admit, libtards, commies, dems, – you loved that shit then? You post your stupid anti-Trump pictures trying to show how smart you are. But when you are showed Budapest Memorandum (signed by your Bill Clinton) you scratch your head saying: “well…you know… yes, buuuuut…..mhm.. don’t fuck show me anymore this shit, we signed by mistake too many time ago”. Ok.
    Thus, it was you (your Obama) who screwed the real social-justice revolution in Ukraine. Therefore, GO FUCK YOURSELF! And deal with Trump!

  40. unbeliever1 says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 7:37 am

    Obama must have squirmed when Trump said, “Radical Islamic terrorism”.

    • JawsV says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 8:28 am

      I think Hussein was squirming throughout! Heh! Hillary, too. Did you see the grimaces on their faces during Trump’s speech? So funny!

  41. bytheway says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 9:48 am

    Honestly, I am pleased as punch. I love watching the idiots on the left squirm, especially muslims and their ‘beloved’ shariah law. There is no doubt that people are being paid to riot and disrupt. I do not hale from the US, but I certainly wish our leader was Trump, refreshing to hear a person speak his mind and he has every right to put America first. The rest of the world is acting like America owes them, well no it doesn’t. They have every right to put themselves first and to protect their own people. I think I should like to immigrate now…

    • LouiseM. says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 10:41 am

      ”There is no doubt that people are being paid to riot and disrupt.”

      It was SO refreshing yesterday to SEE the reality with our own eyes. For years, Obama, Clinton, the Leftists, the medias, Soros, have made us believe that they represent the majority, and that the rest of us are miserable racists and islamophobes.

      Well, yesterday, we could see where the majority truly was: acclaiming Mr Trump wise speech.

      The pretense of the hired Soros’ protesters to prevent this innumerable joyful crowd from attending the inauguration made this criminal gang known for what it is:
      a few noisy organized savages pretending to impose their wicked will on the sovereign People.

  42. Pong says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Trump’s war on “radical islamic terrorism” will be as effective as the war on drugs, war on poverty, war on terror and so on. It is like to treat headache caused by a brain tumor. It will make a patient more comfortable, but the problem is stii there and will likely get worse. The disease is islam. If islam continues to be a legal ideology, terrorism will continue. Only by making islam as illigal as some other cults, war on terror can be successful. American congress might pass a law banding islam after 2 or 3 more 9/11ns.

    • Demsci says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 2:55 pm

      With all due respect Pong; the war on drugs is already a war on something illegal. And as you implied: “not winnable”.

      So we cannot be sure if “outlawing Islam” will be a better strategy than outlawing drugs has been. Just saying.

      But happily Western Democratic Nations can be broadcasting what their laws and values are FOR, and where Islam is AGAINST them. Besides fighting Islam, we can primarily think about and promote what we are FOR. Even though this seems so self-evident that we take it for granted and don’t think about and don’t appreciate it much any more.

      Just like we can legalize drugs and then stop fighting the drug-users and their drug-use and the drug-dealers, and only let the police make the situation bearable, while at the same time promoting healthier lifestyles, especially for youth.

    • Demsci says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 2:55 pm

      With all due respect Pong; the war on drugs is already a war on something illegal. And as you implied: “not winnable”.

      So we cannot be sure if “outlawing Islam” will be a better strategy than outlawing drugs has been. Just saying.

      But happily Western Democratic Nations can be broadcasting what their laws and values are FOR, and where Islam is AGAINST them. Besides fighting Islam, we can primarily think about and promote what we are FOR. Even though this seems so self-evident that we take it for granted and don’t think about and don’t appreciate it much any more.

      Just like we can legalize drugs and then stop fighting the drug-users and their drug-use and the drug-dealers, and only let the police make the situation bearable, while at the same time promoting healthier lifestyles, especially for youth.

      • Keith Gilbert says

        Jan 21, 2017 at 4:44 pm

        Killing islam is all that works, notions of enlightening or educating them to our ways lead to nothing but more waste…kill the lot of them…either they are done or we, all of US, are.

  43. vlparker says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 10:49 am

    Great idea, Mr. President. Start with “America First” and ban all muslim immigration to the US. Also, deport all muslims who are not US citizens and close down all mosques for sedition. Islam mandates an establishment of the islamic religion,. The first amendment prohibits the establishment of religion Therefore, all islam is seditious.

    • Keith Gilbert says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 4:45 pm

      The US has no sedition laws.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:12 pm

        You are mistaken, Keith:

        https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-115

  44. Florida Jim says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 11:09 am

    Mr. President Trump will deal with Islamic terrorism much better than Obama who simple declared “it is not a problem” now they are looking to behead him I fear.CAIR an all muslims will now double-down on beheading and lying.

  45. Charles Martel says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 1:28 pm

    It’s a good start by Trump but we need to stop using radical, militant, hijacked, fundamentalist or any other qualifier for Islam. Spencer is correct to label it orthodox and mainstream Islam. (I wouldn’t dare argue with him anyway).

    • Rob says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 3:33 pm

      It’s a great first step. Next is breaking through the wall that protects us from honestly discussing where the inspiration for the Jihadi’s comes from. We all know the answer to this, however, it is still, at this moment, verboten to know and say this. Let’s hope that Trump leads the charge to change this!! He will take a lot of fire if he leads this movement to bring the truth of islam into the light for all to see. Only the bravest of people have the makeup to do this. Robert Spencer is honorably on the front lines of this fight. Kudos to him. My song ‘Nothing to do with islam’, is my small contribution to this fight. Here it is:

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:14 pm

        Thank you, Rob.

  46. Rich says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 8:25 pm

    There is no such thing as a Moderate Muslim, only Apostate ones, and there is no peace in the Religion of Islam, only a cult of death and ruination….we had better stop this practice of surrendering ourselves to our sensitivities and start acting on our rights to Self Preservation, because we are at war with Islam and despite what you are told, there is no such thing as a MODERATE nor Peaceful Islam…
    If you are a Muslim that Practices Quranic, Sharia Law, than you are Devout Muslim. You’re Not a Radical nor have you Radicalized Islam, and you certainly didn’t Hijack the Islamic Faith, You Are in fact a DEVOUT Muslim to your Quran and a loyal follower of your prophet Muhammad.
    If You are a Muslim that does not adhere to Quranic Law than you’re an Apostate and many are irresponsibly and dangerously labeling them as MODERATES, of which, they are not. Matter of fact, they are even more dangerous because their actions are the most hidden.
    stumpknocker

  47. Rich says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 8:26 pm

    There is no radical or moderate islam. There is only islam. There is only the Quran.
    Islam has been warring within itself for centuries: Sunni vs Shia.

  48. Rich says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 8:27 pm

    There is No Such Thing as “Radical” Islam

    What Americans should expect is violence, because violence is an integral part of Islam. First, racism has nothing to do with religion. Affleck needs to read a dictionary.
    Muslims who follow Muhammad’s teachings practice and engage in honor killings, child marriage and institutionalized domestic violence. They are not minorities—they are following the Qur’an.
    Their goal is not worldwide totalitarian rule.
    Muslims commit violence because they are following Muhammad and the Qur’an. Islam, literally translated, means “submission” to Allah—or death. The Qur’an, Hadith, and the Sunnah all clearly articulate that Islam is a political ideology designed to implement worldwide totalitarian rule through Shari’a Law.

    http://constitution.com/no-thing-radical-islam/

    • Jaladhi says

      Jan 21, 2017 at 9:03 pm

      Agree with you! There is no such thing as radical Islam and moderate Islam because Islam is all radical and nothing else!

      Muslims commit violence following Mohammad as he is their ideal man to be followed. They want to terrorize the world as Mo said “I have been made victorious by terror”. That is why any Muslim can become a terrorist at any time as he sees it to be his holy duty to terrorize non-believers.

      And of course it is their goal to bring the entire planet earth under allah’s rule and they will do anything to achieve it.

  49. Les says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 9:09 pm

    Trump triumphed over Treason and he’ll bring hell to ISIS and he Will Make ISIS WASWAS

  50. eternal vigilance says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 10:16 pm

    It is quite simple! The believers in Islamic Jihad are irrevocably committed to death or enslavement of the infidel, which is most of the civilized world. They are irredeemably committed to conquering every nation not committed to Allah. For the infidel, you and I, it is life through the defeat of all Islamists. There is no middle ground, no compromise, no acceptance of civil law by the followers of Allah. Their promises are worthless as they are instructed by Allah to lie to the infidel

    Their complete defeat is best accomplished by brutally attacking them before all of their loose groups unite. There can be no quarter, no mercy, only their death as we meet them on the field wherever and whenever the opportunity arises!

  51. gravenimage says

    Jan 21, 2017 at 11:13 pm

    Trump vows to “eradicate completely” “radical Islamic terrorism”
    ……………………..

    No, this is not possible–but just consistently defending against Jihad, which is certainly implied in the above, would be wonderful.

    • David, Thailand says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 12:32 am

      Do you really think so?

      The concept of fighting to survive in the knowledge that your best outcome will leave you preparing for the next battle is a doomed effort, when the correct course is to fight to secure a future with fewer and lesser threats.

      Charles Martel made that mistake, fighting for the moment. To be fair he knew little about Islam, or that it was the fuel for many genocides between the death of Mohamed a hundred years earlier and his Battle at Tours. A thousand years after Martel and the Polish king Sobieski did much the same by uniting a vulnerable and frightened Europe to dissuade the scourge at Vienna. Between these two great events and since, Europe has treated Islam as a traditional enemy, one to be pushed back just hard enough to force a temporary retreat after which it could lick its wounds, rearm, retrain, probe, prod and try again. In more recent times, as we became ‘civilised’, soldiers of Allah do this within our borders with our money and weapons.

      But now we have no excuses; we know that Islam aspires to world domination and that its core beliefs do not allow it to coexist with non-Muslims. We know because there is no shortage of Muslims citing their own holy texts to tell us, yet we prefer to keep punching ourselves in the face because that’s easier than addressing a force that cannot be beaten within the constraints of liberal values and principles. The world may be big enough for several religions, but not when one of them is Islam.

      While it is easier said than done, especially within the strictures of a fat and complacent democracy throttled by political correctness, the correct formula must be to set aside democratic principles for long enough to eliminate existential threats, currently Islam, which is supported by the equally toxic ideology of the Left, so that future generations will not need to fight in order to survive the same hazards that any self respecting society should have dealt with.

      Instead, our leaders trample over each other to demonstrate how tolerant we are, and invite and sponsor a hate-fuelled ideology to form fifth columns in our midst.

      Our future generations will scratch their heads in disbelief.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 22, 2017 at 11:18 pm

        We have successfully isolated Islam before, David. If you believe we can actually wipe it out, go to it.

  52. David, Thailand says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 12:25 am

    A bit ambitious, and clueless, but at least he’s prepared to call a spade a shovel, which is closer than other world leaders.

  53. stephanie wilson says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 2:28 am

    interesting coming from the same man who falsely accused bush of starting a war based on lies. 9/11 was not a lie. i’m sorry, pres bush was doing that. fighting radical islamic terror. what a hypocrite.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 22, 2017 at 11:21 pm

      I don’t think Trump meant that 9/11 was a lie–he is not a “Truther”. I believe he was saying that “weapons of mass destruction” or Iraq’s involvement in 9/11 was incorrect.

  54. LairdKintyre says

    Jan 22, 2017 at 3:07 am

    This is the attitude the Commander in Chief should have had on Sept 12 2001? Why was it not so?

  55. Priyant Mangat says

    Jan 23, 2017 at 6:18 pm

    There is finally hope for the forces of civilisation.It seams that the tide has turned from the favour proggresive into the favour of civilisation.I feel relief sensing that under President Donald J Trump there will be catastrophic defeats inflicted on the forces of Jihadism.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Infidel on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.