The march has been described by the news media as a female protest against Trump, with reports that hundreds of thousands might attend.
This anti-Trump march – financed in part by George Soros — pretends to be about women’s rights, but the event represents a woeful “glitch” in our culture. The organizers of this march, as signified in the story below, demonstrate an unwillingness to confront authentic issues of human rights abuses against women. The women featured in the story were humiliated through serious sex abuse, but their plight was dismissed by leftists because of who the perpetrator is — much like the plight of women who are victims of abuse by Muslim men.
Jihadists and Islamic supremacists are a curse to women globally, treating them like dirt. Take, for instance: the Muslim migrant rape epidemic across Europe and the attendant cover-ups; the treatment of women sanctioned by Islamic jurisprudence (Muslim men are allowed to beat their wives and imprison them in their rooms); the sanctioning of the rape of infidel women and the taking of sex slaves, all of which we have been inundated with news coverage.
The female victims of Bill Clinton who are interviewed in this article are speaking out against rape; their voices serve as a reminder that the individuals who are organizing an anti-Trump protest right after his inauguration are missing in action when it comes to supporting real victims of serious abuse everywhere.
The official partner’s list for the Women’s March on Washington reads like a who’s who of the far-left, including groups such as CODEPINK, the Southern Poverty Law Center…… Many of the march “partners” are financed by Soros.
This “celebrity endorsed” march does not represent interest or compassion for real female victims of rape and human rights abuses, but instead shows them up for what they are: hard-hearted leftist ideologues who are overtaken by their own rage to the extent that they are blinded to genuine justice and compassion. It is unsurprising that “many of the march partners are financed by Soros.”
The mission statement for the march claims that the gathering is meant to send a message “that women’s rights are human rights.”
Apparently women’s rights are irrelevant if the perpetrator is a Muslim, or if the perpetrator is an individual whom the organizers support. The march organizers are insulting to women who have experienced unspeakable trauma at the hands of individuals or groups that those organizers favor; and are forcing a political agenda, while pretending to care about women’s rights.
“EXCLUSIVE: Bill Clinton Sex Assault Accusers To Anti-Trump Women’s Marchers: ‘Shame On All Of You’”, by Aaron Klein, Breitbart, January 15, 2017:
Bill Clinton’s famous sex assault accusers Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey are strongly criticizing the upcoming Women’s March on Washington, a celebrity-endorsed event planned for the day after Donald Trump’s inauguration.
The march has been described by the news media as a female protest against Trump, with reports that hundreds of thousands might attend.
The mission statement for the march claims that the gathering is meant to send a message “that women’s rights are human rights” and pledges to fight against those who have demonized “survivors of sexual assault.”
Speaking to Breitbart News, Broaddrick had strong words for the march organizers:
I am a survivor of sexual assault. I am one of the people you are supposedly marching for. I was raped by Bill Clinton. Did you hear me? I am one of many that Bill Clinton assaulted. Where were you ladies when I was hurting and scared? This past year, I once again told about my horrific encounter with Bill Clinton.
Where were you? You were silent because of your support for Hillary Clinton. Shame on you; all of you. I can finally move forward because your candidate, Hillary Clinton, and Bill Clinton, my abuser, no longer matter.
Willey stated, “Donald Trump has ‘demonized’ victims of sexual assault? How so? Exactly what do they call what Bill and Hillary did to us? They are the king and queen of demonization and defamation. Where were they when we needed them? I’ll be sure to look for them at the inauguration. I’m looking forward to looking them in the eye.”
Jones took particular offense at the involvement of Hollywood celebrities who are slated to participate in the march.
“Hollywood is insane and they are idiots. Most of America doesn’t care about what they have to say, as we all witnessed during the last election. These celebrities should only be there for our entertainment when we want to go see them. Otherwise they should shut up,” Jones told this reporter.
Addressing the march organizers, Jones stated,
What did they do for us when we were sexually assaulted by the man that they actually support? I mean their brains are so twisted and so fried. Where were they when we were out there telling our stories again about the Clintons, and how Hillary enabled him to do what he did, and then she covered it up and smeared us. What about us? We are women and nobody came to our defense, especially from Hollywood.
Celebrities who have confirmed attendance at the so-called Women’s March include Chelsea Handler, America Ferrera, Unzo Aduba, Scarlett Johnansson, Debra Messing, Padma Lakshmi, Julianne Moore, Hari Nef, Yara Shahidi, Constance Wu, Olivia Wilde, Monica Ramen, Katy Perry, Cher, Danielle Brooks, Patricia Arquette and Zendaya.
The mission statement for the march reads:
The rhetoric of the past election cycle has insulted, demonized, and threatened many of us – immigrants of all statuses, Muslims and those of diverse religious faiths, people who identify as LGBTQIA, Native people, Black and Brown people, people with disabilities, survivors of sexual assault – and our communities are hurting and scared. We are confronted with the question of how to move forward in the face of national and international concern and fear.
In the spirit of democracy and honoring the champions of human rights, dignity, and justice who have come before us, we join in diversity to show our presence in numbers too great to ignore.
The Women’s March on Washington will send a bold message to our new government on their first day in office, and to the world, that women’s rights are human rights. We stand together, recognizing that defending the most marginalized among us is defending all of us.
Last week, Breitbart News reported the march is backed by a who’s who of far-left organizations, including scores of groups financed by billionaire George Soros.
Activists Gloria Steinem and Harry Belafonte are serving as honorary co-chairs.
In 2005, Belafonte founded the Gathering for Justice group, which has since been the recipient of numerous grants from Soros’ Open Society Foundations.
Open Society also supported the New York production of a play starring Belafonte titled “The Exonerated” about wrongly convicted death row inmates. Soros’ foundation sponsored a series of “talk back” conversions after the play “where justice advocates and death penalty experts from across the country will speak and field questions from the theater audience.”
Belafonte serves on the board of the Advancement Project, which was one of four primary recipients of money from a group created in 2008 called the Election Administration Fund. The Fund reportedly raised between $5.1 million–$1 million from Soros’ Open Society Institute.
Meanwhile, the official partner’s list for the Women’s March on Washington reads like a who’s who of the far-left, including groups such as CODEPINK, the Southern Poverty Law Center and 350.org.
Many of the march “partners” are financed by Soros.

Mac-101 says
I sure looks like to me the Neo Bolshevik Global NWO is using Islam as their major tool in the destruction of Western Civilization and Freedom as we know it. These Women libbers, Gays and Atheist and ALL others who do NOT value Freedom are worst than Useful Idiots! There is not one Islamic Paradise that any sane person would want to live in who is middle class to lower middleclass, let alone poor!
Kay says
I’m fed up with Americans being used by Soros to cause unrest in our country.
Gloria Steinem is not a baby; she ought to be standing up for women around the world who are enslaved and abused by Islam.
Dee says
I agree completely. On both counts.
Ross Lloyd says
All anti-Trump activists are pro-Islamists.
Westman says
It almost seems obvious that, like the SPLC, the women’s rights groups are segueing into other areas to restore relevance. Where have they been for the last 20 years?
Considering the timing, this will just lead to more division, as it won’t be viewed as anything but an intentional affront to a new POTUS. We can fully expect shouts of, “He’s not my President”, while some of them hold fond memories of Jack Kennedy; who was blackmailed by the FBI’s Hoover over the White House pool parties and womanizing.
This will be perceived more as sour grapes over Hillary losing than gaining anything positive for women.
Trump may be a good POTUS or not. If I really care about this country, and I am a Patriotic citizen, then I will allow him to determine that through his own stewardship in that office, without my interference.
This march, to take place before he is even in office, is sedition in a “Women Against Abuse” wrapper.
Wellington says
The idiocy and hypocrisy of Leftism on display again.
billybob says
These women really care about women’s issues. They will be a positive force for change. For sure we will be seeing many dozens of signs protesting the imposition of female genital mutilation upon millions of helpless girls around the world. Besides that, there will be many protesters holding signs up high protesting honour killings and child brides, lack of education for girls, the misogyny of Islam, restrictions on women’s freedom in Islamic countries etc. There are endless issues of which these women will elevate to a high profile. I for one will be watching for these signs and cheering on the marchers as I see them held high.
Wellington says
Fine sarcasm, billybob.
Ah, women en masse on the Left so deserve it, ignorant, hypocritical and just plain stupid are so many of them.
Meanwhile for these rubes (rubettes?) Trump is the real enemy. Of course he is.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
devil trump will always oppose sharia,because sharia says no to nudity which trump cherish to touch all sensitive positions of women without lawsuits.these protesting women are saying no to that abuse.
Wellington says
You just keep posting, ibrahim, and thus by doing so further discredit the worst religion ever developed by man. Yep, you just unwittingly keep doing your “bit.” Countin’ on it.
Here’s a thought for you: Forced virtue is sham virtue. Islam is King here. Only when people can freely choose between what is right and proper as opposed to what is wrong and improper, does liberty exist. Islam of course, an eternal enemy of freedom, the ultimate control-freak religion, has never grasped this. It never will. Nor it seems will you. But then liberty for Islam is an inveterate enemy and if this isn’t telling about Mo’s creed, then nothing is.
I know what I have just written will escape you, but then so much over the centuries has escaped the deluded adherents of the spiritual totalitarianism which is Islam. Always has. Always will. And this is why Islam must be discarded with no foolish attempts to reform this heinous belief system since you can’t reform putridity. Oh yeah, you won’t get this at all. A “given” here.
Can’t make rot not rot, you know. And this is why those who prize freedom, and comprehend just how precious and fragile it is, will ALWAYS oppose ignoramuses like you and what they believe in. Have a nice day, ibrahim.
billybob says
Well spoken!
gravenimage says
Good post, Wellington.
Debi Brand says
” this is why Islam must be discarded with no foolish attempts to reform this heinous belief system since you can’t reform putridity.”
Amen, Wellington, my Friend. Amen.
Lesley says
High 5, Wellington :-))!
Rachelle the Patriot says
Great job, Wellington!
gravenimage says
Witless Muslim supremacist ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
devil (sic) trump (sic) will always oppose sharia,because (sic) sharia says no to nudity which trump (sic) cherish to touch all sensitive positions of women without lawsuits.these (sic) protesting women are saying no to that abuse.
……………………………
Where to start with this claptrap? Firstly, is muhammed still claiming that Donald Trump is going to mandate that women attend his inauguration in the nude–or did even he realize that his makes him look like an idiot?
Then, the idea that Shari’ah “says no to nudity” is ridiculous. As muhammed would have it, any woman not immured in a Hefty bag is “nude” and can be raped.
In fact, it is under civilized Infidel law that rape is criminalized–not under Islam.
And the idea that these women are in danger from Donald Trump, but are safe with hordes of invading Muslim rapists is just grotesquely false.
Debi Brand says
“…Donald Trump is going to mandate that women attend his inauguration in the nude….”
Yes indeed, thus, at long last, an inauguration I can attend, can I say, comfortably.
For that reason, I for one, for darn sure, ibrahim, plan on being there. Likewise, likley will drive there, and do so as you have stated, in accordance with Trumps above cited “mandate.”
gravenimage says
Hilarious, Debi! 🙂
Debi Brand says
Thanks g.i.
Glad you enjoyed that.
As they say, a woman’s got to do what a woman’s got to do.
Adrian Johnson says
Wow — Islam thinks it can legislate morality with Sharia law. Got news for you: the ritch and virtuous politicians in the USA decided with the “prohibition laws” to outlaw all alcohol production and sales in the 1920’s. Result? for Muslims, it was probably a very “Islamic” moment. However the average citizen, even those who didn’t drink alcohol much or at all, resented the Government legislating “morality”. They started making boot-leg wine and whiskey in their bathtubs (hence the term “bathtub-gin” and a huge underground economy helped poverty stricken people make illegal income; and it also fueled a huge increase in Mafia activity which consumed the energies of the police in all the States so that they could not police other crime. So at the end of the decade, the Government came to its senses, repealed the “prohibition laws” and the crime wave collapsed, alcohol consumption went way down, and people got on with their lives. I wonder if you get the moral of this?
Free people naturally chose to be virtuous. The wicked will be wicked no matter what the legal system. Islam doesn’t believe this. Sharia has so morally crippled Muslim men that it makes them believe that they are incapable of self-control around women, and therefore women must be “covered up” so as not to “tempt” weak-willed Muslims who are slaves to their “uncontrollable” lust. How pathetic is that !
Noah T says
Mohammed is the devil! Keep your Sharia Garbage in Saudi Arabia!
Jack Holan says
Their benefactor Soros a 1 per center who wants the World to redistribute its wealth just not his because then he would lose his control and power to pursue programs designed to weaken the USA and eliminate Israel. These fools know something about Islam and women it’s not that they are blind, or defective in their brain; they simply have hardened their hearts to stone. As far as Hollywood, the name says it all. I entertain myself by watching them act however I don’t confer with them to discuss scholarly topics. Why would I rely on their perspectives?
Guest says
Even the left wing doesn’t completely buy this march. Despite some nonsense in this article, even this writer admits that Trump has been pretty good on women’s issues: http://theweek.com/articles/667163/why-womens-march-washington-already-failed:
“Sure, he is a sexist pig who likes to go after high-profile women — Rosie O’ Donnell, Megyn Kelly, Alicia Machado — who cross him.”
“But here’s the curious thing: On women’s issues, there is a wide gulf between Trump’s character and his policy positions.
For much of his adult life, Trump claimed to be pro-choice on abortion. Now he insists he’s pro-life, and is threatening to appoint pro-life justices to the Supreme Court. This is a genuine problem for women (like me) who strongly believe in reproductive rights. However, in other respects, Trump has made a concerted attempt to extend an olive branch to the feminist lobby. He has embraced gender wage parity, government-mandated maternity leave, and child tax deductions in defiance of his own party. One can debate the wisdom of these ideas, but not that they are intended to help women. And then there are his three female Cabinet appointments, and a fourth woman as U.N. envoy.”
I find this interesting. What do people really want – someone who is a sweet darling but weak on equal rights policies, or someone who can be a total jerk but actually makes decent policies?
Guest says
Reading this makes me so happy that Clinton didn’t win, and that she doesn’t have long to live
Guest says
That’s the other guest. I don’t write such nasty things, horrid though Clinton can be.
gravenimage says
Yes, Guest–I’m not looking for Hillary Clinton to die; I just want to see her out of politics.
Roger Dodger says
Women seem to have zero idea they can be beaten or stoned to death under Sharia law—for NOTHING.
And gay women have zero idea they could be thrown off a rooftop and freeking DIE on the pavement below.
This is becuase their is a severa mental disorder in Liberals.
The demented, god-cursed LEFT will try to deny Trump, lie about him, obstruct him, and hurt him at every single turn—and this includes hurting ordinary people like you and me.
—And MY LIFE MATTERS! (MLM!)
And so does yours, and the lives of your families. These are times that try our souls. Lift up the banner of of your sacred honor, life, liberty, and Fortune’s favor:
?If the left’s lips are moving, they are apparently lying or deluded. The same applies to their supporters, enablers, Fake Newsers, and advocates.
Don’t buy their CDs or the products they hawk on TV, don’t go to their inane movies, don’t visit their stupid sites, don’t listen to them on the radio.
Don’t watch them on their Fake News TV, don’t buy tickets to see them do ANYthing, and especially don’t watch or attend their dumb, leftist-activist “shows.”
Are they the oily, lying, “Shmuck Shroomer,” political type?
Or the lying, insane, “You can Keep Your Doctor,” I-rule-the-world, type?
Or the “Pajama Boy,” t-Shirted, Marxist-indoctrinated, spoiled, over “educated,” multi-multi-billionaire, web or silicon mogul type?
Or the blathering, “Holy,” Islamist, devoutly corrupt, Marxist, “priestly” type, from some other world?
Or the radical, leftist, multi-millionaire, arrogant, self-agrandizing “media” liar type?
If so, they would be your leftist, Islamist, One-World, slave-master wannabes. Your Rulers in waiting. And they are coming after you and your family, just as they are coming after Donald Trump and his family.
And…you have only to see the bloated, vacuous, debauched-looking face of their newest poster shill, John “The Tea Party Spit On Me” Louse,” the failed, “great civil rights leader,” to see how they roll in their own, filthy, stinking lies about Donald Trump and you.
Their despicable “heroes,” like John Louse, and—Her The Stumbling Zombie Witch of New York—they demonstrate they stop at Nothing to grasp and clutch at their rotting, stinking, filthy goals for YOU.
Don’t believe any lying word they say. Ignore their lies. Defund them; block their plots.
“Find them; fix them in place; isolate them; and ridicule them.” (To paraphrase their leader, Saul Alinksky)
Think: would you maybe wipe them out financially, or have them praising Trump, in about 6 weeks? ??
.
Will you pass these ideas onward and forward to your mailing lists and resources? It’s your Move, isn’t it?
.
.
M.C.M.Zarook says
Why this Aie Hoi about Sharia Law. Any knowledgeable, thinking, unbiased man will know 90% of the Laws in the US and other European countries form part of Sharia Law. Very many thinks in terms of what is going on in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is not the Vatican of the Muslim. Brutal practices of Saudi Regime is to keep them in power. Chopping the head and Chopping hand is mostly done in Saudi and Iran. Muslim men and women are guided by the Quran to dress modestly. Many of the readers of this forum must read the Quran and are entitled to dismiss them having read it. We came to world as human beings thereafter one may be a Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu and the rest. Welfare of the humanity is much important at this moment of time.
gravenimage says
M.C.M.Zarook wrote:
Why this Aie Hoi about Sharia Law. Any knowledgeable, thinking, unbiased man will know 90% of the Laws in the US and other European countries form part of Sharia Law.
………………………………
Of course, this is utterly false. Under Shari’ah, women and unbelievers are systematically oppressed–there is no institutionalized inequality like this in the West. There are no “Blasphemy” laws in the civilized world. Women are not prosecuted for “Zina”.
And this doesn’t take into account the sorts of things that *aren’t* prosecuted under Shari’ah law, such as “Honor Killings” and kidnapping and raping Infidels.
More:
Very many thinks in terms of what is going on in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is not the Vatican of the Muslim. Brutal practices of Saudi Regime is to keep them in power. Chopping the head and Chopping hand is mostly done in Saudi and Iran.
………………………………
The idea that brutality under Shari’ah is restricted to Saudi Arabia and Iran is meretricious nonsense. 75% of the women in prison in Pakistan and Afghanistan are in for “crimes” of Zina, such as resisting forced marriage or fleeing an abusive marriage. Victims suffer amputations for petty theft in Nigeria, Sudan, and under the Taliban in Afghanistan. There is stoning on the books in such diverse places as Nigeria, Somalia, Indonesia, and the Islamic State. There are many other examples.
More:
Muslim men and women are guided by the Quran to dress modestly.
………………………………
And no mention that women can be beaten or even murdered if they resist the Hijab or Burqa.
In fact, the veil has *nothing* to do with modesty. Qur’an 33:59 reads:
“O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known and not molested.”
“Not be molested”–that is, unveiled women may be raped with impunity.
More;
Many of the readers of this forum must read the Quran and are entitled to dismiss them having read it.
………………………………
Actually, many of us here *have* read the Qur’an–see above–and the Hadith and Sira and compendiums like the “Reliance of the Traveleller”, as well.
Shari’ah law is hideously brutal everywhere, and on just the same lines–and this is no accident. It is based entirely on the actions of “Prophet”, who amputated limbs, crucified people, and stoned victims to death.
More:
We came to world as human beings thereafter one may be a Christian, Jew, Muslim, Hindu and the rest. Welfare of the humanity is much important at this moment of time.
………………………………
Well, that sounds lovely–except that it is your coreligonists who are slaughtering people all over the world right now in Jihad terror attacks.
On your own site, you threaten that if Muslims become “frustrated”, that they will slaughter more innocent people another Charlie Hebdo attack. Incidentally, this is *also* based on Shari’ah law, to prevent “blasphemy”–that is, to crush freedom of speech, as well as to murder people.
You also sneer at freedom and human rights–no surprise there.
https://www.facebook.com/mohamedcassim.mohamedzarook
Lesley says
I have distanced myself from my female leftist friends for reasons of personal dynamics and principals that are of the same flavor as their ridiculously misplaced outrage.
There’s such a myopic focus on their own selfish self-indulgence, and God forbid that they have to confront their own behavior– this triggers either overt histrionic rage, or condescending relational aggression.
They are just fine with ignoring your feelings and boundaries, because they are clearly more noble, virtuous, and informed, and the offense of their sensibilities are the only offenses that matter.
Everyone gather round and warm your hands on the virtuous fire of their smouldering smugness and imaginary martyrdom.
I chuckled to myself the other day that it has been a blessing I had already fallen out with my leftist female friends. The friendships probably would have ended in a fist fight regarding the election, otherwise.
Joyce Lorraine Beck says
These women are standing up for women’s rights as human rights. The unending assault on women’s choice, patriarchal supremacy, and economic inequality supported by the American radical right is sickening and disgusting to me. George Soros is not behind the Women’s March on Washington. Women are. Open your eyes. When you begin to treat women with respect, they will quit protesting against you. No, Islamic women are not all terrorists or the supporters of terrorists, and those who are not deserve support from American women and men, not condemnation. Radical right so-called “Christians” are different from Islamic right-wing radicals only in degree. They all have contempt for women. That includes you.
I have appreciated your exposure of the many wrongs committed by radical Islamic terrorists, but you need to take a look at your own wrongs. Why is the Christian God always portrayed as male? It is, in fact idolatrous to equate God with masculinity and blasphemous to worship an all male God in the place of the true God Who includes and transcends both genders. Do you really believe that God is a dude who created women for the convenience of men? I suspect so.
There are many terrible passages in the Bible, indeed, “texts of terror.” When King David’s son rapes his daughter Tamar, the great king laments that his poor son will be labeled as a “rapist.” He has no compassion for his daughter, but totally disregards her. There seems to be no problem when Joshua’s army invades Canaan and slaughters every man, women, and child. Read Matthew and Revelation on how non-believers are to be treated, first by Israelites, then by Christians.
The best Muslims, probably the Sufis, like the best Christians find the heart of their religions’ message, which is love, peace, and righteousness and attempt to practice it. The right-wing autocrats attempt to kill, insult, or dismiss those who do not belong to their “one and only true religion.” They conquer women, attempt to steal their bodies, silence their voices, and rob them of their liberty and free choice. Radical Islamic men treat women awful, but that does not excuse you.
Carolyne says
Ms. Beck, I pity you because obviously something horrible has happened to you at the hands of some man. I have never experienced any of the things you mention and I am an atheist so don’t believe there is a God, male or female. I am sorry you hate men. I was married to a wonderful man who treated me as an equal because he believed that I was his equal. When he died, part of me died with him but I don’t hate men because my husband died. You are very bitter and I fear it is bending your perception of life and depriving you of the love and companionship one finds with another person.. Get some professional help to perhaps soften your hatred toward others.
Lesley says
@Joyce:
The violence in the old testament is descriptive, as opposed to prescriptive and directive as it is in the Koran and Hadith.
How many humans have been raped, trafficked, or beheaded by someone emulating Jesus? Zero. Can the same be said for Mohammed with a straight face?
Devout Christians can sometimes be annoying, but they are not nearly the same, only differing in degree.
Maybe Trump could offer a one-way ticket to safe zones in the Middle East for leftists who gripe about the God of the Bible being referred to as male. Then the rest of us could get some hard work done, and it would probably refreshingly raise the collective American IQ by one standard deviation 😉
Kay says
@ Joyce Lorraine Beck:
This is for you, (from the God of the Bible):
[The Lord answered] “Can a woman forget her nursing child
And have no compassion on the son of her womb?
Even these may forget, but I will not forget you.
Now, who is the “you” in your post?
gravenimage says
Ms. Beck, are you unaware that women are being raped, subjected to FGM, child marriage, forced marriage, “Honor Killings”, and stonings under Islam?
And I’m afraid that your idea that Sufism does not embrace brutal Shari’ah law is mistaken:
“Sufism Without Camouflage”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2005/02/bostom-sufism-without-camouflage-beyond-stephen-schwartz
duh swami says
Lindsy Lohan has converted to Islam and moved o the UAE…
She is a role model for all these women marchers to look up too…Maybe follow…
gravenimage says
That was, of course, a hoax.
gravenimage says
Actually, Swami, I could be wrong:
“Robert Spencer in The Hill: Lindsay Lohan may have made her worst life choice yet”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/robert-spencer-in-the-hill-lindsay-lohan-may-have-made-her-worst-life-choice-yet
Her mother has denied it, but it is unclear what is going on.
Troybeam says
Soros, needs to be removed from America, as for the Hollywood Conceits they need to worry more about China buying out all the studios than Trump running the nation.
Kay says
+1
Carolyne says
Reading that so-called “Mission statement,” I can only wonder when Mr. Trump professed any of those beliefs. I listened to many of his speeches and heard nothing like that. However, if they were to march against Islam with the same “Mission Statement,” I’d agree with them and likely join them.
Angemon says
My 2 cents:
There’s a “pecking order” – a totem pole, an hierarchy – of victimhood for the progressive left. The higher you are there, the more you can get away with. White Christian Straight Males in Western nations can’t get away with anything, whether the accusation is true true or imaginary (“micro-agressions”, “manspreading”, “mansplaining”, etc). Western Women are above them because historical “patriarchy”, so “feminists” can get away with saying, for example, that whenever a women cries “rape” or “sex assault” it is to be assumed that an actual “rape” or “sex assault” took place – and having a consensual sexual encounter but thinking the next morning “that was terrible, I wish I hadn’t done it” means that the consent is retroactively withdrawn and what happened was rape. But when the perpetrator comes from a third world nation, things take a 180º turn. Sure, women are to be believed and the perpetrator is to be presumed guilty, but the perpetrator is above them on the pecking order – coming from a third-world hellhole which, as “everyone” “knows” was surely the result of historical Patriarchal Western Imperialism, colonialism and plundering of resources (again, as “everyone” “knows” you can’t make money out of thin air so for Western nations to be wealthy they surely plundered the valuable natural resources of places like Pakistan or Malawi) grants them a free pass, because they have no other way to express their hatred of Western Imperialism other than coming to Western nations and raping women while living off welfare.
Carolyne says
Yes, when a woman cries “Rape” leftists want us to assume they are truthful, except if the accused is named William Jefferson Clinton. Then the woman is lying.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Stupid victimology-spewing extortionists.
Terry says
I don’t watch television and don’t consult weather guides on the net. BUT PERHAPS –A NICE HEAVY RAIN STORM, OR EVEN BETTER- SNOWSTORM, ON THEIR PARADE. RAINSTORM, THEN AGAIN, MIGHT BE BETTER.
Make them as all wet physuclaly as they are intelelctually.