Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.
This special edition of the Glazov Gang presents the Dr. Bill Warner Moment with Dr. Bill Warner, the president of politicalislam.com.
Dr. Warner discusses How to Use the Elements of Islam to Vet Muslim Migrants, asking: Is the Koran wrong or right about wife-beating, sexual slavery, killing unbelievers and political assassinations?
Don’t miss it!
And make sure you watch Dr. Warner focus on The Self-Taught Revolution against Sharia, unveiling how intellectual guerilla fighters are breaking through the elite’s Party Line on Islam — and making the truth available for the common man: CLICK HERE.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account or GoFundMe campaign to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel and to Jamie Glazov Productions. Also LIKE us on Facebook and LIKE Jamie’s FB Fan Page.
John A. Marre says
Islam is incompatible with the Constitution of the USA. No person can practice both at the same time. Choose one.
murad says
I will choose islam because it’s the fashion now.
Michele Schiesser says
Would love to see what Dr.Warner and others have to say in writing.Those of us who live in rural areas cannot watch videos.Thanks
jihad3tracker says
DR. BILL WARNER IS ONE OF OUR TOP COUNTER-JIHAD EXPERTS.
Don’t let his bow tie fool you into thinking that this guy won’t shred (politely, of course) any apologist for Islam who is unlucky enough to get within conversational distance.
He has written plenty of FACTUAL, THOROUGHLY CITED BOOKS — and has them available for purchase at his website, www (dot) politicalislam (dot) com.
You could also drop a note of gratitude for the many years of time and effort in the ceaseless war to prevail against that sick cult of death named Islam.
Stephen Rohaty says
This technique won’t work because the koran allows mohammadans to lie to infidels.
jihad3tracker says
You are right about permission to lie, but Dr. Warner’s point is to get past WESTERN, NON-MUSLIM persons’ defense of Islam, by using individual parts of Sharia to confront those clueless infidels, and help them understand that when they take on the attitude of admiration for Islam, they are actually showing approval for the brutality of subjugation and violence.
quota raven says
Good observation, well observed, Jihad3.
Cheers!
quota raven
Lenore says
this was my thought too.
quota raven says
To Lenore and Stephen – Use this method when arguing with dhimmi apologists, as suggested by an earlier comment.
Cheers!
quota raven
Peter Clemerson says
To John Marre
If you have a cell phone handy, you can google the verse in front of the Muslim trying to deny the truth. Let him see your screen.
PRCS says
A sample question–for Muslims:
1. Do you believe a thief’s hand should be amputated as a punishment?
If the answer is yes, well…….
If the answer is no:
2. As Allah commands it, is he wrong?
jihad3tracker says
Hello PRCS — You have zeroed in on a superb way to get Muslim heads to explode, at least metaphorically, but some of the “deep thinkers” might carry that over into somatic reality.
For those of us who want a bigger amusement shovel, assemble a list of questions for pathological directives, several of which are in Surah 9 (especially the Verse of the Sword, of course).
If we want a refresher in their citations and the doctrine of abrogation, it is here: www (dot) citizenwarior (dot) com, found by typing “The Qur’an’s last word on non-Muslims” in its search box at the upper right.
But you would be well advised to have a pal standing beside you — just in case that worshipper of bloodthirsty Allah gets into high dudgeon and decides on physical retaliation.
PRCS says
Amusement shovel. Hhe!
Thanks for that link.
Hugh Fitzgerald suggested having several pals nearby in a recent post, too. Not for protection, but to be able to overwhelm mosque rats during those “get to know a Muslim” shindigs.
I like the idea for both reasons.
Tjhawk says
We should try to use conversational judo sometimes. Try to use islams arrogance and supremacism to your advantage. Try to frame questions in a way that kind of forces them to display this arrogance, all the while seeming so tolerant and nice yourself.
What drew you to islam?
Could you tell me about the perfection of islam and the koran?
How universal is the message of islam and the koran?
How clear is the message? Could anyone ever misinterpret a perfectly clear message?
What is the relationship muslims have with mohammed?
How perfect is mohammed?
How perfect is the life of mohammed? Are mohammed and his actions the perfect exemplars for people to use?
Could you tell us about the ummah and the deen?
Is there any way of living that could possibly be an improvement on the deen?
Try to get them to seem arrogant and supremacist without seeming to attack the nice muslims.
Tjhawk says
Also, get them to explain the concept of the “revert”
jihad3tracker says
An excellent series of questions, Tjhawk. But I would bet dollars against doughnuts (as an old expression goes) that a majority of Muslims in the age range of 20 to 50 here in the U.S. acquired Islam at birth — from their parents, and are really bereft of extensive knowledge.
If you and others reading this are not already aware of Dr. David Wood (Fordham PhD), and his brilliant videos, one in particular seems especially relevant: “The Jihad Triangle” — running a very comfortable 4:56. It includes David’s concise analysis of the “radicalization” process and why that may be successful or resisted.
Tjhawk says
Yes, you are right about the knowledge part. At least they will have to admit they don’t know much and can’t reliably speak for islam.
Then there is the problem that some will catch on to your “nice cop” routine and just start lying. Thereby forcing a more aggressive countermeasure.
I just don’t want Islam to completely control the narrative at interfaith kumbayafests and I want them to seem like the a$$h0!es and not me.
PRCS says
“they will have to admit they don’t know much and can’t reliably speak for islam”
Interesting thought.
RodSerling says
If Warner’s exercise here is merely rhetorical to educate non-Muslims, I think it is more educational to discuss why his proposal is not viable in present-day Western society.
Islam apologists, and many Muslims, already have answers to pretty much any issue such as the ones Warner raises. Islam’s policies of deception aside, lots of people, Muslim or not, talk differently to an out-group, especially a more powerful out-group that has something they want, than they do in privacy to their in-group. People from poor countries and/or countries that lack freedom who want into the West, will say whatever it is they think the immigration officials want to hear.
Also, Warner has not even considered the fact that huge numbers of people who work in immigration are actually highly sympathetic with Muslims–and indeed some are Muslims. These officials are not likely going to turn someone away, even if Warner’s elements-of-Islam test were official policy and a candidate failed it.
What Warner is talking about is too simplistic. Like practically everyone in the counter-jihad who has made such proposals, he has not even taken a look in detail at actual immigration policies, much less actually consult some experts who agree with the need for ideological screening.
Sure there will be some Muslims who will out of pride or cluelessness answer his questions about wife-beating and the Qur’an, etc. But most will engage in deceptive apologetics and denial, examples of which are also easy to “find on Google” as any fact about Islam. Those who intend to harm us will be especially motivated to lie.
Any vetting procedure must take into account the fact that people will lie. Therefore the vetting should not rely entirely on verbal or written responses, but rather more on objective information and a risk assessment. Where objective information about an individual cannot be found and verified, the risk must be deemed too high to allow that person’s entry. In many cases, we already know enough about Muslims’ views from surveys within a country of origin that it would be pointless to engage in vetting of individuals–the vast majority of Muslims there will fail at least one crucial, deal-breaking item on an ideological test, so it would be pointless, time-consuming, and expensive to process them when other more viable candidates could be processed. (Exceptions might include those who have in public, in their countries of origin, been persecuted as dissenters or apostates, but these too should be vetted). This is to say nothing of known violent crime rates of people from certain countries, e.g., people from North African countries who are in Europe. These crime data, to a sensible authority, would be grounds for a complete ban on entry of any such individuals from these countries-of-origin–regardless of what they say or even truly believe at the time of the screening. Unfortunately, our authorities in many Western countries will either not collect this information in the first place, or if they do then suppress it, or in any case not act on it. Our authorities and media are much more interested in prosecuting Islamophobia than they are in keeping out jihadists, violent criminals, thieves, and welfare tourists.
Rik says
Warner’s just trying something, he knows his business believe me . But I agree taqiyya is always a problem.
What you say about those who want to do us harm being motivated to lie though :
the sneaky or clever ones maybe , but I find those hate preaching jihadist morons refreshingly honest about the hatred of the west . The morons seem to lack the caution of taqiyya practitioners.
Jerry says
Bill Warner is awesome, been watching his vids for a long time. I don’t know why, but he looks to me like a brilliant accountant that hates numbers. lol. I have no idea what that means. Anyway, he rocks.
DFD says
They lie through their teeth. A westerner will lie differently from a native Muslim.
A Muslim is a risk and should be excluded from western society. That’s it, that’s all there is.
Only exception: Apostates. Western converts usually leave Islam after 2.5 to 5 years. That refers to about 65 to 75% of converts. Those who stay and remain Muslims have no place among us. And that’s that!
DFD says
PS: Not disrespect to Dr Warner. I distribute DVDs (picked that up from the ultra right wingers), though by hand, through letter boxes. About 20 a week. Some of his videos are always included.
And always his 1,400 years, what are we afraid of…
Just in case of undue criticism.
Angemon says
Superiority of men over women? Wife beating? B-b-but, muslimas say that islam is the most feminist of religions!!!
Rik says
LOL “femimist religion” ??? Seriously ?
That muslim whore was lying with every breath as well as crowd surfing for sympathy. Self proclaimed victims make me sick!
common sense says
The conversations, plans and policies of our elected leaders and appointed judges are all being tapped by the NSA, CIA.
It’s George Orwell’s nightmare come true. Great explanation here by a true patriot Larry Klayman who sued the NSA in 2013 and won for doing what they are doing right now against judge Robert’s ruling order. Whoever is behind this need to be arrested by the fbi and investigated. A special prosecutor and grand jury is in order.
http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/02/emergency-hearing-sought-to-stop-nsa-spying-on-trump/
sliverp says
Very relevant, but, one word: Taqiyya.
Idea: mass deportation to their beloved muslim states.
Gerald Mucci says
Reminder: There is no Islam without Sharia, without wife beating, without the inferiority of women and kafirs, and without political assassinations and the supremacy of Islam. They are inseparable. Be careful thinking there can be a “moderate” Islam without these elements.
solange silverman says
Yes, but Muslims are commanded to lie to infidels for the purpose of forwarding the agenda of jihad.
Ade says
The Dr. places far too much emphasis on wife beating .. There is one verse on wife beating in the koran compared to well over 100 jihad verses .. Clearly islam is more about jihad than it is about wife beating
mortimer says
The misogyny, bigotry, hatred of disbelievers, cruel punishments, taqiyya and kitman, jihad-warfare against disbelievers, supremacism of Sharia law, Islamic segregation and apartheid and belief in slavery are all incompatible elements in a future American citizen.
I don’t see how Muslims can take the American oath of citizenship with the smallest amount of sincerity. If Muslims were wired to lie detectors during the oath taking ceremony, I am sure the alarms on the LIE DETECTOR MACHINES WOULD ALL GO OFF TOGETHER and the machines would EXPLODE.