This is in most respects a typical Washington Post piece; indeed, it is typical of establishment propaganda media articles in general: it presents demonstrably true statements about the nature and magnitude of the jihad threat as if they were clearly false and evidence of a bigotry and hatred that should shock all decent, right-thinking people. (The only way in which it is not typical is that WaPo reporter Matea Gold actually allowed me to respond to the “anti-Muslim” smear, although she did not, of course, explain why anyone should take the hard-Left Southern Poverty Law Center seriously as an authority on “hate” when it includes no Leftist groups on its “hate” list.) More below.
“Bannon film outline warned U.S. could turn into ‘Islamic States of America,’” by Matea Gold, Washington Post, February 3, 2017:
The flag fluttering above the U.S. Capitol is emblazoned with a crescent and star. Chants of “Allahu Akbar” rise from inside the building.
That’s the provocative opening scene of a documentary-style movie outlined 10 years ago by Stephen K. Bannon that envisioned radical Muslims taking over the country and remaking it into the “Islamic States of America,” according to a document describing the project obtained by The Washington Post.
Absurd! Preposterous! Hatemongering! Fearmongering! Right? Well, Matea Gold didn’t bother to ask Omar Ahmad what he thought of this. Ahmad, Hamas-linked CAIR’s co-founder and longtime Board chairman, once said: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” He denies saying those words, but the original reporter still stands by her story. And Hamas-linked CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper once said: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.” Meanwhile, according to a captured internal document, the Muslim Brotherhood (to which all the major Muslim groups in the US are linked) is dedicated in its own words to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within, and sabotaging its miserable house….so that it falls, and Allah’s religion is victorious over other religions.” Then there is the Washington, DC imam who wants to “establish an Islamic State of America by 2050.”
But Gold mentions none of this, and if Infidels take note of it, they’re racist, bigoted, “Islamophobes,” according to the Washington Post.
The outline shows how Bannon — years before he became a strategist for President Trump and helped draft last week’s order restricting travel from seven mostly Muslim countries — sought to issue a warning about the threat posed by radical Muslims and their “enablers among us.” Although driven by the “best intentions,” the outline says, institutions such as the media, the Jewish community and government agencies were appeasing jihadists aiming to create an Islamic republic.
Much has been made of this as alleged evidence of Bannon’s “anti-Semitism.” Here again, unpleasant facts are no less facts for being unpleasant. Jews in the U.S. voted overwhelmingly twice for Obama and his policies of appeasement. Those Jews who didn’t are just as upset about that as anyone else, because they see how self-defeating it is. And as for government agencies, since 2011, by Obama’s order, scrupulously avoided any mention of Islam and jihad in connection with terrorism. It was essentially an official policy of appeasement.
The eight-page draft, written in 2007 during Bannon’s stint as a Hollywood filmmaker, proposes a three-part movie that would trace “the culture of intolerance” behind sharia law, examine the “Fifth Column” made up of “Islamic front groups” and identify the American enablers paving “the road to this unique hell on earth.”
The outline, titled “Destroying the Great Satan: The Rise of Islamic Facism [sic] in America,” lists Bannon as the movie’s director, as well as its co-writer with his longtime writing partner Julia Jones. The title page includes the line “A Film by Stephen K. Bannon” in capital letters….
The outline offers an early glimpse of Bannon’s belief that the West and “supremacist” Islam are headed for a “fundamental clash of civilizations,” as the outline says. Bannon later expressed this view publicly as chief of Breitbart News, a site that often features articles about radical Islamists and has provided a platform for the alt-right, a small, far-right movement that seeks a whites-only state.
This is, as commonly repeated as it is, an outright lie. The establishment propaganda media first equated the term “alt-right” with “white supremacist” and then tars Breitbart with it. In reality, of course, there is no white supremacist promotion at Breitbart.
“We are in an outright war against jihadist Islamic fascism,” he said in a 2014 talk via Skype to a group at the Vatican, according to a transcript first published by BuzzFeed. “And this war is, I think, metastasizing far quicker than governments can handle it.”
9/11. Fort Hood. Boston. Garland. Chattanooga. Orlando. San Bernardino. Etc. 30,000+ violent jihad attacks worldwide since 9/11. Was Bannon really exaggerating?
“I believe you should take a very, very, very aggressive stance against radical Islam,” he added, citing ancient battles between Christian and Islamic forces….
The 2007 film summary calls the Muslim Brotherhood “the foundation of modern terrorism.”Shadi Hamid, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who reviewed the outline for The Post, called it “propaganda” that was “designed to generate hate against not just Islamists, not just extremists, but Muslims writ large.”
He offers no evidence to back this up, and of course the WaPo reporter doesn’t ask him for any, because this is what she wants to hear.
“There’s no way you can look at this and Steve Bannon’s other comments and remarks and say Steve Bannon is a friend of American Muslims,” said Hamid, the author of “Islamic Exceptionalism: How the Struggle Over Islam Is Reshaping the World.”
“It’s remarkable that someone involved with a film like this is at the center of power at the White House,” he added.
And this is the idea: to intimidate President Trump into dropping Bannon, because the establishment propaganda media is convinced that much of what makes Trump Trump really comes from Bannon. They’re hoping that a Bannon-less Trump will be toothless and easy to control.
Tim Watkins, a producer who participated in discussions with Bannon about the project, rejected the idea that the film was driven by anti-Muslim bias.
“This is not because Bannon had a hate or dislike for Muslims,” Watkins said. “I believe that he believed that no society is without its radical fringes.”
Watkins said he and Bannon met with Steven Emerson, author of the 2002 book “American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us” and founder of the Investigative Project on Terrorism, at an Italian restaurant in Washington and discussed the project. After hearing about Emerson’s research, Watkins said he came up with the idea for the opening sequence featuring the reconstituted American flag flying over the Capitol dome.
“Based on what I heard, it seemed like a documentary in the making,” Watkins said.
Emerson, whose book asserts that many Muslim institutions in the West have provided ideological support for militants, is listed as an executive producer in the proposal. A section of the film was to be drawn from his research archives, according to the document.
“Steve Bannon and I definitely had some interaction at some point about a film, due to a mutual interest in the threat of radical Islamism,” Emerson wrote in an email, describing himself as someone who deeply respects Islam. He added that he did not recall ever seeing the outline, which he said contained material that was not drawn from his work.
“I believe there is a witch hunt and campaign of character assassination being waged against Steve Bannon for his comments against radical Islam like there has been waged against me for many years in order to silence critics of radical Islam,” he said.
No doubt about that.
The outline uses stark language to spell out the dangers posed by Islamist jihadists.
“The ideology is scary, and its ideologues will frighten small children as we bring to light an unbroken chain of ‘thinkers’ who epitomize the culture of hate,” the outline reads.
Part of the film would detail “the rise of a global holy war — financed by the cash flow of oil — to attack and destroy western civilization,” according to the outline.
The proposal names two dozen conservative writers and terrorism experts who could serve as potential on-screen guests, including Robert Spencer, director of the Jihad Watch website, who is labeled by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an anti-Muslim “propagandist.”
In an email, Spencer rejected that term as “a smear,” adding that he is “no more anti-Muslim than critics of Nazism were anti-German.”
Spencer, who has written for Breitbart and was interviewed by Bannon on Breitbart’s daily radio show, said he did not recall any discussions about the 2007 film proposal. But he said that he found Bannon “to be brilliant and extraordinarily well-informed about both the history and doctrines of Islam.”
The outline warns about “front groups and disingenuous Muslim Americans who preach reconciliation and dialogue in the open but, behind the scenes, advocate hatred and contempt for the West.”
It names the Council on American-Islamic Relations and the Islamic Society of North America as examples of such “cultural jihadists.” After The Post’s revelation of the 2007 script, CAIR officials on Friday urged Republicans to call for Bannon’s dismissal, saying that he promoted “virulently anti-Muslim conspiracy theories.”
Matea Gold doesn’t mention some salient facts about Hamas-linked CAIR and Hamas-linked ISNA. Why did she see fit to omit these facts, which would significantly change her readers’ views of Bannon’s critics? CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. As I noted above, CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) A California chapter distributed a poster telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI, and a Florida chapter distributed pamphlets with the same message. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.
Same question for Gold regarding ISNA. Federal prosecutors included ISNA on a list of unindicted co-conspirators in the Hamas-financing prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF). ISNA is listed among “individuals/entities who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood.” ISNA’s conferences have featured pro-jihad rhetoric: at the 2009 convention, for example, panelists expressed extreme anti-Semitism and support for Hizballah.
Omissions like these demonstrate why I call the Washington Post and its ilk the establishment propaganda media. They aren’t anything close to news outlets. They are propaganda centers for globalism and Islamic supremacism.

efoc says
Yeah Matea Gold, don’t let facts get in the way of doing your job. Yes – facts….what a journalist used to research and insert into their articles.
IQ al Rassooli says
CAN A MUSLIM BE A LOYAL AMERICAN?
This article is for all those Politically Correct dim wits and their liberal retards. I hope that all those who LOVE their country to read it from start to finish and send it on to others. One can replace American with any other none Muslim nationality on Earth and the result is the same.
The ONLY ‘refugees’ in world history that will NEVER Assimilate or Integrate within any non Muslim society are the Muslim INVADERS (not refugees) who come to Europe, USA, Canada etc while not a SINGLE Muslim or Arab country would WILLINGLY allow any of them in theirs and not a single Media, Academia, Politician or Clergy tell the American people WHY!
To make sure readers appreciate how accurate it is, I challenge anyone – especially Keith Ellison, CAIR, ISNA, AMJA and Haroon Moghul – the sum of $100,000 to prove me wrong.
Theologically – NO. . . Because his submission is only to Allah – originally the name of the supreme rock god of Pagan Arabia- and hence most definitely not the same as the God of Jesus, Moses or Abraham.
Religiously – NO. . . Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Submission to Allah).
Al Imran 3: 85 “If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah) never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter he will be in the ranks of those who have lost”
Scripturally – NO. . . Because his allegiance is to Sharia based upon Muhammad’s Quran and Sunna.
Textually – NO … Because Muhammad’s Quran is Hatemongering, Warmongering, Misogynist, Racist, Intolerant, Duplicitous, Hypocritical & hence UNGODLY.
Geographically – NO. . . Because a Muslim bows in reverence to Mecca in Arabia, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially – NO. . . Because his devotion to Islam forbids him from making friends with Christians and Jews ~
Al Mai’da 5: 51 “O ye who believe! take not the Jews [Yahood] and the Christians [Nasara] for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them…”
Al Tauba 9: 29 “Fight [qatiloo] those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His apostle nor acknowledge the religion of truth [ISLAM] (even if they are) of the People of the Book [Christians & Jews] until they pay the Jizya [onerous penalty for not being a Muslim] with willing submission and feel themselves humiliated”
Loyally – NO … Because his allegiance is primarily to ALL other Muslims all over the globe.
Ishaq:231 “Muslims are one ummah (community) to the exclusion of all men. Believers are friends of one another to the exclusion of all outsiders.”
Politically – No. . . Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual Leaders), who teach equal opportunity HATRED for ALL those who are not followers of Muhammad (currently 80% of humanity called Ummat al Kuffar/ Nation of Infidels) as well as calls for the destruction of America, The Great Satan.
Al Fath 48: 13 “And if any believe not in Allah and His Apostle We have prepared for those who reject Allah a Blazing Fire!”
Domestically – No. . . Because he is instructed to marry up to four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him
Al Nisaa 4:34 “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other and because they support them from their means. … As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct admonish them; refuse to share their beds; beat them …”
Legally – No. . . Because he cannot accept the American Constitution as binding since it is not from Allah’s Sharia as well as he believes the Bible is corrupted.
Culturally- NO… Because Muslims belong to a culture that prefers Death more than Life.
Ibrahim 14: 3 “Those who love the life of this world more than the Hereafter who hinder (men) from the Path of Allah and seek therein something crooked: they are astray by a long distance”
Constitutionally – No. . . Because Sharia is the nemesis of Democracy; it does not allow for freedoms of religion, expression or belief. Democracy and Islam is an oxymoron; a state of affairs that cannot possibly co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial, autocratic or theocratic and hence dysfunctional.
Spiritually – No. . . Because the USA declares ‘one nation under God.’ The Christians’ God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran’s 99 excellent attributes.
This is why American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about all the world wide atrocities allegedly committed by so called ‘radical’ Muslims.
Not once has there been a major demonstration – whether in Europe or the USA – by the so called ‘silent majority’ Muslims expressing their revulsion at acts of terror committed by these alleged ‘radicals’ shouting out loud “NOT IN OUR NAME!”
Muhammad said: SILENCE means CONSENT!
Therefore, after much study and deliberation…. Perhaps Americans should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in their country.
Muslims obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you will, these are the FACTS based entirely in chapter and verse upon their scripture.
Americans had better believe it. The more who understand these realities, the better it will be for Americans and their future generations.
This is NOT a clash of Civilizations but a clash of Beliefs.
Footnote: Muslims have PUBLICLY and repeatedly declared their intention to destroy the USA from within.
FREEDOM NEVER COMES FREE.
IQ al Rassooli
Kafir & Proud!
http://www.alrassooli.com
MAGA & DTS!
Westman says
The establishment media represents the big cities where a person’s relationship is more defined by economic transactions, the fight for recognition, and power. It sees itself qualified to dictate the immorality of its adherents as virtues for the rest of the society. The degradation that it has injected into Hollywood over 70 years is stunning, as is the nightly TV carnage and sexuality that our youth are absorbing.
Even as an agnostic, I can see how the media has destroyed the moral core of this nation by running down every institution, including the US government, to where many citizens have no purpose, patriotism, and only demonstrate when something threatens their selfish desires. Whether they intend to destroy the US as a nation, or not, they are doing it.
The media is frightened for its very existence as other voices have entered that that have a new influence. The old big media never wanted real democracy and tried to consolidate the outlets into a few society-shaping hands. That model is falling apart as new communications, deservedly, fractures the media.
The more rural America is now speaking up and the liberals can’t handle the truth about themselves. The “right” wants a nation defined by borders and a future – and they will have it. Liberals can’t shame them because it’s the liberals who should be ashamed.
Government needs more Steve Bannons, who actually care more about preserving the US as a nation than following Europe to its destuction.
Geraldine says
Nor is it just the Capitol:
“I want to see flag of Allah flying over Downing St”
Anjem Choudary
Oh, and he also had his sights on the White House flag pole.
Dismiss him as a clown, as some have done, at your peril.
BRYAN O"CONNOR says
A moslem brotherhood operative gets ‘ PRIMETIME ‘ speakers slot at the DNC 2016 . The father of ‘ Orlando Gay Nightclub ‘ schooter gets prime seating at Clinton campaign speech . A known jihad & sharia supporter, marches openly promoting same at ” WOMENS’ MARCH ” ! Conclusion; DNC and Enmedia support jihad !!
Terry says
The Washington Post is a liberal mouthpiece. Run by the elite, , the “intellectuals” who know best.
I think that they are going the way the NYT is going- down the toilet. Of course, they know better then the majority of the people people who, in 3084 of the 3,144 counties in the US voted for Trump.
davej says
Just because some people were paying attention and not just accepting the ROP pablum does not make them racists, right wingers or white nationalists. It actually makes them Patriots, more in the tradition of Paul Revere.
The goal of the Muslim Brotherhood and it’s many offshoot pressure groups is to overthrow Democracy and replace it with Sharia law. They have stated this plainly and it has the whole Islamic ideology behind it.
Angemon says
The Washington Post called Milo Yiannopoulos “one of the most visible faces of the [alt-right]”. Milo is an Jewish born covert to Catholicism homosexual with a preference for black men. I’m not a WaPo journalist, but it seems to me that white supremacists would despise him based on any of those characteristics, let alone ALL of them. I take Milo as an example of what the Wapo has been doing for some time now: anyone they don’t like is an “alt-right”. Alt-righters everywhere. And yet, they are here claiming that the “alt-right” is a small movement. Heck, they even dedicated an article explaining how the “alt right” was not about white supremacism but while male supremacism, so they’d be a fringe inside a fringe, right? Why is it, then that the WaPo dedicates so many articles to it and seemingly sees alt-righters everywhere while claiming they’re a small movement?
davej says
WaPO needs a boogieman and can’t bring themselves to recognize the real threat, even tho “white nationalism” is a far more racist term than Muslim.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Until recently he was a harmless guy who added a lot of value to the economy. At this point, maybe it’s time to organize a boycott of Amazon. It’s an awful thing to think, but maybe Jeff’s company should be forced to start paying the taxes paid by his brick and mortar competitors, those that still exist.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
The Washington Post is correct in pooh-poohing the idea of “Muslims taking over the country and remaking it into the “Islamic States of America”.” The new name of the country is all wrong. Here’s a map:
http://www.robertferrigno.com/map_.htm
Westman says
Zombie Zone of D.C. ? Diabolically amusing map!
Stan Lee says
Printed by the Washington Post, from a WaPost reporter who secured the story based upon information from “The Southern Poverty Law Center.” Don’t let the name ot that law center fool you, folks. The SPLC kept the name from its original owner when he sold the operation to its present owners.
The SPLC today is a”confidential” component of the Democrat-Socialist propaganda network, its name has remained to fool people of color that the organization lives only to represent them against the alleged “bigotry” of people who are not Democrat-Socialists..
Its original owner, Attorney Morris Dees, formed that operation to represent victims and claimants against the KKK, which at that particular time was operating in defiance of the federal government. Mr. Dees took them on and went to court against them, gaining judgements of substantial financial awards against them.
The need for his professional services diminished to a degree where he finally sold the law office to the present owners, whose operation became more of a political type of practice.
But, it still exists under SPLC and Socialist-Democrat newspapers like the Washington Post use it as a “Reliable source.” More fake news? I think so, the President’s political enemies have been after Steve Bannon for a long time, not just because he’s with Trump. Bannon was an chief editor in the Breitbart News Organization, before going to work in President Trump’s campaign. Breitbart is a distinguished conservative news operation still reporting reliably..
don vito says
If these putz were not so stubbornly wedded to their hideous narrative, I would contact them, but I do not believe the truth appeals to the WP or any other of the liberal/left/progressive/Marxist/moslem/black bloc true believers. Therefore a waste of time contacting them, when the term racist can be used so easily used to discredited their opponents ( in their eyes). WP can’t be trusted.
dumbledoresarmy says
Perhaps Matea Gold should go to Amazon or suchlike, and look for a book by an American convert to Islam, one Jeff Lang, entitled “Even Angels Ask”.
It was published in **1997**. And it includes an account of a conversation that occurred at least ten years previously.
Years ago, a poster here at jihadwatch, who had obtained and read this most illuminating book, shared some excerpts. I can’t link to the relevant part of the archives, because all comments threads from longer ago than 2013 have disappeared, having gotten lost along the way, it seems, as jihadwatch has shifted from platform to platform.
Anyway: here are those excerpts from “Even Angels Ask”.
On Muslim jurisprudence and interpretation and application of the founding texts:
“A minority of Muslims … believes that we must remain cognizant of the historical context of Muhammad’s actions and sayings and that if we are to apply his example correctly, we must be alert to the many differences that exist between his time and ours…
“The main assumption behind the stricter approach [which is followed by the majority] is that the best and most efficient way to derive moral and spiritual benefit from Muhammad’s life example is by imitating him as closely as possible. (p. 104)
And,
“Almost all (note that ‘almost ALL’ – dda) Muslim religious leaders … uphold the classical dar al Islam/ dar al harb concept …
“**This poses a very difficult personal dilemma for many converts, because it seems to them that to become a Muslim, they are required to become enemies of their own countries** [my emphasis – dda] (p. 119)
The jihadwatch commenter then added –
‘And Lang writes of his own experience attending a Muslim lecture at an American mosque in the early 80s (nota bene – we are talking about something that happened **in the early 1980s** – dda)
“The second lecture was given by Hisham, a very bright medical student who had been studying in America for almost two years. I liked and respected Hisham very much…
“Hisham spoke that night about a Muslim’s duties and responsibilities…
“His speech was very moving and had been running about an hour when he closed it with the following unexpected and stern remark.
“Finally, we must never forget–and this is extremely important–that **as Muslims, we are obligated to desire, and when possible to participate in, the overthrow of any non-Islamic government–anywhere in the world–in order to replace it by an Islamic one.** [my emphasis – dda]”
“Hisham!” I interrupted. “Are you implying that Muslim American citizens are to commit themselves to the destruction of the U.S. government?– That they are to be a fifth column in America–a secret revolutionary group seeking to overthrow the government? Do you mean that when an American converts to Islam he must commit himself to political treason?!”
“I thought that by presenting Hisham with a very extreme scenario, it would force him to soften or qualify his statement.
“He looked down at the floor as he pondered my question momentarily.
“Then he looked at me with an expression that reminded me of a doctor about to break the news to his patient that his tumor is malignant.
“”Yes,” he said. “Yes, that’s true.” (p. 117).”
FROM JIHADWATCH THREAD, 4 August 2009.
To repeat. Two people – one an expert and devout cradle-Muslim, a guest lecturer at a mosque in America, discussing the ‘duties and responsibilities’ of being a Muslim – and the other, a native-born American convert to Islam.
The Musilm states, “”Finally, we must never forget–and this is extremely important–that as Muslims, we are obligated to desire, and when possible to participate in, the overthrow of any non-Islamic government–anywhere in the world–in order to replace it by an Islamic one.”
See that? – “…as Muslims, we are obligated to desire, and when possible to participate in, the overthrow of any non-Islamic government–anywhere in the world–in order to replace it by an Islamic one.”
The American convert, who seems not to have previously heard of this aspect of his new faith, responds: “”Are you implying that Muslim American citizens are to commit themselves to the destruction of the U.S. government?–That they are to be a fifth column in America–a secret revolutionary group seeking to overthrow the government? Do you mean that when an American converts to Islam he must commit himself to political treason?!”
And then the born-and-raised Muslim replies – with one word – YES.
Kay says
Well, *this* should have made front page news then and repeatedly until everyone was talking about it.
No wonder they’re working to make marijuana legal state by state until the whole country falls. They need a highly controllable population.
dumbledoresarmy says
In the same place where I filed a copy of the above exchange, as soon as it was shared with us at jihadwatch, I found also something else, another “handy quote” which I thought it good to squirrel away for future reference.
Here it is.
“Lebanese Islamists in Favor of ‘Offensive Jihad’ to Conquer the World and Impose Islam,” from MEMRI, July 21 2009.
“Following are excerpts from a public address delivered by members of the Islamist group Hizb Al-Tahrir in Lebanon, which aired on Al-Jazeera TV on July 21, 2009.
“In principle, Jihad is an offensive Jihad, which was instated in order to spread Islam throughout the world.” – Muhammad Ibrahim, member of the advisory council of Hizb Al-Tahrir in Lebanon.
And yet the Useful Idiots, like Matea Gold, think that Bannon was making things up??
Now, here’s something else of interest – a link at which you should be able to watch a ‘time lapse of terror” from the 1980s to the 2010s.
Not sure whether it represents *all* the Muslim jihad atrocities within the time period mentioned – in fact I suspect it doesn’t – , but it’s very interesting to watch, nonetheless, because what it shows is a clear *escalation* and also an *expansion* of the Jihad, over the past thirty years.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/224082
Further thought: the video itself is a nifty idea, and could probably be further refined. Besides the red ‘bursts’ representing jihad terror attacks one could also include some sort of symbol representing a plot that either failed/ was foiled in the attempt, or else was nipped in the bud, before getting so far as the attempt. (*That* visual representation of attacks that would have caused injury and/ or death, if they had not failed, or been averted, would give people pause; because there would probably be at least as many again, as the red splats that represent successful attacks).
Clever people might also think of some way of representing the *body count*: killed and wounded.
Westman says
If this ran as an advertisment during the Superbowl, the WaPo and NYT would be treading water while removing foot from mouth.
Geppetto says
Abject ignorance in a self absorbed, elitist, smug, indoctrinated, predisposed media makes for an ignorant readership incapable of even considering an alternate view that’s supported by the facts but immediately rejected as the product of the Muslim invented psychosis, Islamophobia. Let’s hope that this “expose” has the opposite effect intended; i.e., Bannon’s stature is elevated as a critical member in President Trump’s inner circle.
The Left has joined the Islamic Jihadists in their disturbingly successful quest to suppress the truth. America desperately needs a strong, aggressive, unintimidated, realist to lead it and the rest of the free world out of this rapidly encroaching miasma of psychotic, barbaric, brutal, hatred for all things deemed un-Islamic by these Jihadist nut cases