Now it is clear why professor Jonathan A. C. Brown had our Jihad Watch correspondent, Andrew Harrod, expelled from this lecture before it began. It is also clear why he responded with such infantile rudeness when I accepted his challenge to debate. Brown would never admit it, but he has taken these positions because he is a Muslim: the Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30).
The Qur’an has Allah telling Muhammad that he has given him girls as sex slaves: “Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty.” (Qur’an 33:50)
Muhammad bought slaves: “Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported: There came a slave and pledged allegiance to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) on migration; he (the Holy Prophet) did not know that he was a slave. Then there came his master and demanded him back, whereupon Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Sell him to me. And he bought him for two black slaves, and he did not afterwards take allegiance from anyone until he had asked him whether he was a slave (or a free man).” (Muslim 3901)
Muhammad took female Infidel captives as slaves: “Narrated Anas: The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, ‘Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.’ Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives. She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet. The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr.’” (Bukhari 5.59.512) Mahr is bride price: Muhammad freed her and married her. But he didn’t do this to all his slaves:
Muhammad owned slaves: “Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah’s Apostle was on a journey and he had a black slave called Anjasha, and he was driving the camels (very fast, and there were women riding on those camels). Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Waihaka (May Allah be merciful to you), O Anjasha! Drive slowly (the camels) with the glass vessels (women)!’” (Bukhari 8.73.182) There is no mention of Muhammad’s freeing Anjasha.
So Brown’s attempt at a sly, pseudo-academic defense of these practices is no surprise at all. And it is an indication of how severely compromised Georgetown University really is by Saudi millions that this adolescent savage is on its faculty.
“Georgetown Islamic Studies Professor: Slavery OK, So is Non-Consensual Sex,” by Ian Miles Cheong, Heat Street, February 10, 2017:
A professor at Georgetown University is teaching his students that men do not need consent to have sex with women, and that slavery is justifiable under Islamic teachings.
Brown himself uploaded the lecture to YouTube.
According to Lee, Brown’s lecture was supposed to revolve around slavery in Islam, but the lecturer moved its focus to criticize the United States, United Kingdom and China. Brown described slavery in these non-Muslim societies as brutal, which they were, but lauded the historically inhumane practice in Arab lands and Turkey.
“Indeed, according to Brown, slaves in the Muslim world lived a pretty good life,” wrote Lee. “I thought the Muslim community was done with this dishonest North Korean style of propaganda. Obviously not.”…
The Islamic Studies professor said that in Muslim societies, “slavery wasn’t racialized,” unlike the United States. Lee points out that this is untrue, given that in the Arab world, black people are referred to as “abeed,” the Arab word for “slave.”Brown stated that slaves were “protected by Sharia,” omitting the various atrocities committed by slave-owners. Girls and women were forced into the sex trade and their male counterparts were often castrated.
“In general you don’t find the brutality that you see in American slavery,” said Brown, who described the historically common practice as “investments” and “walking venture properties” for slave-owners….
Historically, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams conducted warfare against vassal states of the Ottoman Empire to end the Barbary slave trade, in which North African pirates conducted constant raids into European coastal towns to capture men and women for slavery.Brown defended slavery, stating, “It’s not immoral for one human to own another human” by comparing it to marriage—a quid pro quo arrangement in which both slave and master benefited from the arrangement.
“I don’t think it’s morally evil to own somebody because we own lots of people all around us and we’re owned by people,” said Brown.
A female attendee asked Brown about the permissibility of sex with slaves, to which the professor stated that “Consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex,” and defined consent as a Western concept that emerged with women’s suffrage and female body autonomy. Brown, he said, believes that marital rape was an invalid concept in Islam.
Had Prof. Brown’s words been spoken by a practicing member of any other religion, they would’ve lost their jobs and shunned out of the academic world.

Richard Paulsen says
Seems as if indoctrination is preferred rather than education at Universities in the Western World nowadays.
JOHNNIEMAC says
Why does he stil have a job and why no treason charges?
Manual Paleologos says
Because being a sjitbag is not treason.
gravenimage says
He is advocating the rape and enslavement of non-Muslim women. This may or may not technically be treason, but it should certainly be grounds for firing from Georgetown University.
Manual Paleologos says
I am in absolute agreement, there.
Richard Paulsen says
Agree.
Johan Elzinga says
In fact he is very honest and he says what a lot of other muslim leaders do not tell us. One of the things he said is very significant: consent (of a women when she has sex) is a Western concept. He (correctly) states that in Islam women do not have a say in it, it has been decided for them by society and by men, their husband or their own family when they should have sex. So, where are the feminists now? Do we have any feminist left here in the West? Or are they forced to keep their mouth shut? Or do they not care because they think they themselves are not affected by this?
gravenimage says
Good post, Johan. But Jonathan Brown was only honest about Islam when he thought he would not be called on it:
“Georgetown prof Jonathan Brown now says Islam forbids slavery and rape, but in 2015 said it allowed them”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/georgetown-prof-jonathan-brown-now-says-islam-forbids-slavery-and-rape-but-in-2015-said-it-allowed-them
Bamaguje says
If a Conservative like Milo or Ayaan Hirsi Ali tried to speak on the same campus, the university authorities and their crybully brownshirts would shut him/her down.
But an unrepentant misogynistic Islamist is allowed to openly promote Islamic slavery and rape.
gravenimage says
Grimly true.
maghan says
He speaks the truth about Islam–all from the elf-eared horse’s mouth. Thus anyone who knowingly embraces Islam would be fully endorsing rape, slavery and murder–as good things.
Anne Smith says
This is certainly the case in UK. Students are now taught what to think, not how to think.
A Harris USA says
Richard, here is the deal.. I just want to see the stupid females dressed as vaginas line up for the Muslim men !!! This Islamic belief of rape, slavery, and treating women like less than human would be a good experience for them, to see what Islam is all about…since they think this lib professor says it is good, ok it is good for them to live the experience!!!
Angel Gabriel says
Anybody who has a youngster who is thinking about going to Georgetown — steer clear.
Any alumni of Georgetown — cease giving even a penny until that cesspool is cleaned-up. Indoctrination into Sharia is an abomination in a western “university”.
They have to be morons if they think people are going to pay $60,000 a year to have their loved-one indoctrinated, only to come out unemployable, or worse — a potential threat to national security.
jihad3tracker says
DO YOU WANT TO TELL THE PRESIDENT OF GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ABOUT THIS? Joseph A. Ferrara is his chief-of-staff, and this is an email path to reach him: jaf@georgetown.edu
Also, consider send the YouTube lecture to presidents or chancellors of OTHER CATHOLIC UNIVERSITIES. PLEASE INSIST ON A REPLY FROM THOSE PERSONS.
The time is LONG OVERDUE to cut this Muslim cancer from the bodies of institutions which are charged with true scholarship within the context of Christianity.
gravenimage says
Thanks for the contact information, jihad3tracker.
JawsV says
brownj2@georgetown.edu
Angel Gabriel says
THANK YOU JIHAD3TRACKER. Let’s express our feelings and opinions to Georgetown “University”. This type of thing is grotesque — cloaking pro-sharia (the most vile major ideology known to man) indoctrination as “education”, and getting paid for the crime. Shame on Georgetown and everyone involved in this abominable enemy (Islamic terrorism) propaganda dissemination effort.
Jaladhi says
This idiot, misogynist has to be a Muslim and nothing else to hold such abhorrent views!
JawsV says
He’s a convert to Islam. Brown is a moron and most probably a sociopath.
Mongoose says
So if you saying he fits right in?
I wholeheartedly agree.
.
I’m glad they are getting so cocky that they, like the left, are now showing their true colors.
Mr. Bigcockston says
What a revolting person. He should be fired.
maghan says
The fool is doing all this because he was first fanatically obsessed with the P of a muslima. What a perverted ass.
Walter Sieruk says
First,shame on Jonathan Brown for that outlandish and outrageous statement of tying to justify Muslim slavery and rape of females. This is unconscionable of him. If he has a daughter he needs to stop and think how he would feel if such Islamic vile wickedness happened to her. ?
Second, as for those brutal, cruel and vile ISIS jihadist /Muslims kidnapping girls and women and using them as sex slaves. This actually started with the founder and prophet of Islam, Muhammad . Who all Muslims look to as an example of how to behave. It’s revealed in the book JESUS AND THE JIHADIS: CONFRONTING THE RAGE OF ISIS by the Christian authors Graig A. Evans and Jeremiah J. Johnson For on page 124 it informs the reader about Muhammad that “he endorsed sex-slavery as a gift from Allah, and enjoyed offering sex-slaves as gifts…” Further on the very next page it also exposes that “Islam has enslaved more people than any other culture.”
gravenimage says
Walter Sieruk wrote:
First,shame on Jonathan Brown for that outlandish and outrageous statement of tying to justify Muslim slavery and rape of females. This is unconscionable of him. If he has a daughter he needs to stop and think how he would feel if such Islamic vile wickedness happened to her. ?
………………………
He’s a Muslim, Walter–he does no sympathize with the victims of Islam.
gravenimage says
not sympathize
utis says
Where are the goddamn “feminists”? They should be picketing his campus office and shaming the … out of him. Attacking ethnic muslims may be a campus no-no, but this academic clown volunteered for his brain-washing. Let him hang out to dry, girls.
Face it, ladies, Islam is patriarchy. Brown is a clear misogynist, and probably embraces Islam so he can let his misogyny out of the closet. You gals should be sweating about all the other closeted woman-haters who will gladly drop Western values just to put you back in your place. If you’re afraid to fight Achmeds, at least stand up to Professor Browns!
Manual Paleologos says
They don’t care about women. They only care about Lefturd ideology.
simpleton1 says
Bias Response Teams. or Bias Education Response Teams. or Bias Incident Response Teams
Just google it.
Have been set up in many universities.
Surely a tool that is used to safeguard all that is sacred to the Left, and perhaps can be used also to show up their propaganda points, or simply used against that Professor.
Georgetown has its own version
https://biasreporting.georgetown.edu/
Whether it fits into their criteria for a complaint , do check out their guidelines any way. as they do have many different policies on different things.
Inherently they were set up to control and modify dissent, to certain perspectives, which has grown in recent years.
Manual Paleologos says
Rape is a Democrat Family Value.
Mac-101 says
Unfortunately, with the large prevalence of American women who seems to love Bad Boys and be treated badly, in combination with the amassing continued success of the Shades of Gray with their BDSM, is this what lib women really want? They sure support Islam and Muslims far more than is actually healthy for them and their daughters!
gravenimage says
Most Western women–just like men in the West–are in denial about the threat of Islam. The idea that women in the West *want* to be raped by Muslims is utterly false.
Mac-101 says
Did I say they wanted to be raped? I KNOW you know at least half a dozen women who go from one bad boy to the next bad boy time and time again. Do they WANT to be treated badly. Most likely NOT, since they are always crying about it, but they end up repeating the same cycle numerous times. I’ve only known a couple women who broke out of it and ended up with a good guy who treated them right.
.
The back bone of the Lib Democrat Party is Minorities and White women. Why would they support policies that are soft on crime since they and their daughters generally will at some time in their life suffer from it? Do they want to git Murdered, Mugged or Raped? I doubt it. However their actions increase the possibility exponentially. And this is applicable since open borders and mass Islamic immigration is NOT beneficial to free women who pride themselves at being independent and treated equally.
.
So I leave it up to you. Are they just plain Stupid or mentally deficient and can NOT recognize a very visible threat or perhaps are susceptible to the wiles of Satan?
.
American Women have encouraged the Legal, Political and Social climate in this country to remove G-d and destroy the family which drastically affects the security and the income of the average women by expanding the nuclear family into some kind of organizational blob nightmare which at times one needs a chart to sort it out.
.
In the end we are ALL poorer for it.
gravenimage says
Mac-101 wrote:
American Women have encouraged the Legal, Political and Social climate in this country to remove G-d and destroy the family which drastically affects the security and the income of the average women by expanding the nuclear family into some kind of organizational blob nightmare which at times one needs a chart to sort it out.
…………………………..
Not all of them–certainly, most white women in the US in the US voted for Trump. You ignore all the patriotic women in this country.
As for liberal women, most are in the same kind of deep denial that liberal men are in regarding Islam being a threat.
And I do take your point, Mac–but I grew up in an abusive home and I decisively broke that cycle. It *can* be done.
Mac-101 says
Glad you escaped. I’ve tried to help at least a dozen women over the last 50 years and only two managed to break the dependency of abuse. Over half were intelligent women who supported themselves.
.
Hopefully American middle class women have woke up and realize that their is NO free lunch and these massive deficiets and transfer payment gotta stop and we gotta put America back to work at meaningful jobs, Real life ain’t Purdy and the world is eating our lunch!
.
PS: I no way meant to imply ALL, However, since the Great Society 55% of middle class women have been voting for the Democrats against their and the countries interest. Any open minded person had to see Clinton as the Liar, thief, and traitor that she is. Thankfully they shifted to TRUMP even though the majority did NOT like his personality, but KNEW what had to be done to protect the country, themselves and their children. Unfortunately we have found out in the last decade the RePug establishment has been owned by the same Puppet Masters. So is TRUMP really an outsider?
.
Pray Trump will break it ALL up and bring back common sense. He needs to awaken at least 60% of the people to insure America stays on track.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Mac.
Manual Paleologos says
I suspect the attraction of “bad boys” is atavistic, probably hardwired into the psyche. I suspect that Cro Magnon bad boys were the best hunters and providers.
That doesn’t help the women, though, including at least one of my daughters.
Stronger women appear to not be as troubled with this.
Mac-101 says
Unfortunately you most likely are correct. Hopefully your daughter will wake up and end up in her older age with someone who can a partner instead of a major obstacle to her and her children’s situation.
gravenimage says
Good luck to you and your daughter, Manual.
dumbledoresarmy says
“I suspect the attraction of “bad boys” is atavistic, probably hardwired into the psyche. I suspect that Cro Magnon bad boys were the best hunters and providers.”
I’m not so sure.
A good hunter has to be patient and intelligent and persevering and creative; the brutal impulsive boofheads are not going to be able to stalk and capture elusive game. Also, a lot of traditional hunting involves planning and cooperating with *others*, sometimes over a period of days or even weeks.. it’s not about marching out there by yourself and whacking away with a club.
My own suspicion is that in *bad* times it was the lady married to the quiet, nice, clever, patient guy who found her man bringing home that extra protein more often than not… whilst the stupid brutal boofheads were coming home emptyhanded. And the ladies married to nice guys who could work in a team did better than the ladies whose husbands picked fights with everyone.
Genesis offers some interesting insights. Who do the Jews descend from? Not from Ishmael the hunter. Not from Esau the ‘hairy man’, stupid and impulsive (another hunter). They descend from Yitzhaak, who patiently kept on digging wells till the well-stealers gave up and let him be. They descend from Yaakov, who used his wits much more than his muscle, though he could use muscle on occasion. And they have survived everything that history has flung at them.
gravenimage says
Good post, DDA.
There have always been foolish women attracted by bad boys, but I think they have always been a minority, and have not often fared well.
Certainly, no woman attracted by Muslims–luckily, this is uncommon in the free West–is going to do well.
no_one says
This is not a professor, but a savage. My people were subjected to turkish slave trade and it was not fun. Notice how I try not to use a capital letter for the country turkey. This is how much I respect them for what they did. They loved to torture the beautiful white women and man from my country. He things that girls Instead of being free and go study some real science like STEM should be raped by savages. muhammed is really the biggest savage of all.
gravenimage says
Yes–he is a Muslim barbarian in a suit.
Angel Gabriel says
Turdkey has one of the bloodiest history of any country (Armenian genocide, perpetual warring against the Greeks and others). Erdogan is a psychopathic crybully that is an abomination to humanity.
dumbledoresarmy says
What’s even worse is that it’s not as if he is a “cradle Muslim” brainwashed from birth and knowing no better.
He is a *convert*. So he is openly and voluntarily embracing and defending EVIL.
He disgusts me. Personally, I think the police should take an interest in him: he is *altogether* too rapt with the concepts of slavery, rape, and sex with minors (his defence of mohammed’s rape of poor little Aisha). I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if he has, under his bed, a huge pile of jihadi porn and hardcore kiddie porn and other nastiness; perhaps he drools over that ghastly ISIS ‘prospectus’ that lists female sex slaves for sale, with prices given… the highest prices being attached to the obscenely-youngest, the girls under 8. I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if the younger female students find he makes their skin crawl. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he lurks at online forums under fake names, trying to ‘groom’ underaged girls.
Manual Paleologos says
In general Arab slavery was far more brutal than Western slavery, although Caribbean and Brasilian slavery were probably worse. The Arabs commonly castrated their slaves, a process which had an very high mortality rate.
Robert Crawford says
The descendants of slaves taken to the New World are easy to find.
Where are the descendants of the slaves taken to Arabia?
gravenimage says
Exactly, Robert. There is very little evidence of the descendants of slaves in Dar-al-Islam. Many of them were simply worked to death.
Manual Paleologos says
As I said, in general Arab slavery was far more brutal than Western slavery. There are Negro Arabs, but not that many, and my understanding is that they are shit upon. The Arabs took a lot of White slaves, too.
dumbledoresarmy says
And when the women bore children – i.e. mixed-race babies, part African, part Arab or, in Turkey, part African and part Turk – their Muslim masters simply killed the babies.
I can’t give the reference but there was I think a 19th century visitor to Muslim Turkey who remarked upon this: that although black african women were routinely used as sex slaves, there did not seem to be *any* surviving offspring running around.
gravenimage says
DDA, a fellow named Mustafa Olpak founded the first officially recognized organisation of Afro Turks, the Africans’ Culture and Solidarity Society (Afrikalılar Kültür ve Dayanışma Derneği). Olpak claims that in modern Turkey only about 2000 African former slaves have survived and live in modern Turkey.
This is from an article, “Afro-Turks meet to celebrate Obama inauguration”, from Today’s Zaman in January 2009.
If Mr. Olpak is correct, it is shocking that there are only 2000 descendants of African slaves there, considering African women were used as sex slaves there for hundreds of years.
Zimriel says
Re Jabir’s hadith Muslim 3901, “he did not afterwards take allegiance from anyone until he had asked him whether he was a slave” –
This hadith if it’s authentic to Jabir (and I’ve no reason to doubt it) has to do with the situation under Abd al-Malik in the 70s / 690s. MANY dhimmis were converting to Islam, or pretending to, in order to get out of paying jizya. They were also fleeing the farm to get out of kharaj. It’s reasonable to suspect that slaves were escaping their plantations in the Dead Sea and Khuzistan to get out of the (horrible) conditions there, too.
somehistory says
satan the devil sits on this scum slug’s shoulder and he listens intently to the demon, speaking for the demon to mislead and corrupt.
His eyes, his soul, are dead. He speaks in demon language. Who can listen to such evil and not wish to puke?
John A. Marre says
If a Republican had said that, he would have been fired within two minutes. A Muslim gets a free pass because liberalism worships Islam, in its insane quest to rid the world of Christianity.
abad says
Brown, like so many other university professors, whitewashes and rosy-paints Islam to make it appear desirable when it isn’t.
And – you know, JMHO since a lot of college students are not thoroughly grounded in the Bible, they become potential targets for brainwashing.
Just one more reason I have always credited my faith in the Lord during my higher education years and I was an adult student, too.
Kepha says
Ditto. No matter how much the Leftists whine that the Bible is “indoctrination”, as opposed to the “education” they offer, a good grounding in the Bible, with its no-nonsense willingness to expose the sins of the saints and report the victories of Assyria and Babylonia alongside the defeats of Israel, gives lots of people an excellent BS detector.
But I also think that a major problem with a lot of our SJW’s and Snowflakes is that they are terribly, terribly provincial.
gravenimage says
abad wrote:
Brown, like so many other university professors, whitewashes and rosy-paints Islam to make it appear desirable when it isn’t.
……………………
Brown is actually much worse than the run-of-the-mill whitewasher of Islam. Most of these tools just want to believe that Islam is no worse than any other faith and is fully compatible with civilization and democracy.
This is dangerous, but not necessarily evil in motivation.
But Brown is *acknowledging* that slavery and rape are intrinsic to Islam, but then is trying to present this as acceptable.
Angemon says
Where are the “feminists” protesting and trying to shut down his platform? Also, doesn’t that violate Georgetown’s internal policies regarding consent?
https://sexualassault.georgetown.edu
On that page there’s a link to the University’s Sexual Misconduct Reference Guide“, which reads, on the very first page:
Shmooviyet says
@Angemon: no apple-polishing intended– but it’s been priceless reading you, @gravenimage, et al go up against this snivelling spitball flinger. He’s a thumbtack in your hand, pressed firmly into the earth up to his scrawny lil neck.
I’d hope he’s read ALL the comments on these articles the last few days–but it’s unlikely, if he so fears Mr. Harrod even attending a lecture.
gravenimage says
Thank you for your kind words, Shmooviyet–and I very much agree with you about Angemon.
gravenimage says
Angemon, this creep is sneering at the whole concept of consent. And this should not surprise–in Islam, “silence is consent”–in other words, if a girl or woman is too terrified to say no, then raping her is Halal, even is she is just nine. And, of course, there need not be even this level of consent if the victim is an Infidel sex slave.
avi15 says
The man is clearly a brainwashed idiot. He doesn’t even have the intelligence to hide it very well, either. The University should fire him.
gravenimage says
Georgetown prof Jonathan Brown justifies slavery and the rape of female slaves
…………………………….
I looked up Brown’s lecture on the “’Aren’t You Tired of Writing Your Stupid Articles?’ Georgetown Prof Jonathan Brown Expels Critic From Lecture” thread–I hope no one minds my reposting my comments there; I feel they are most salient here:
Here is Jonathan Brown’s–I wonder what his Muslim name is?–repulsive article “Slavery and Islam–part 1: The Problem of Slavery”:
https://yaqeeninstitute.org/jonathan-brown/the-problem-of-slavery/
In it, he pretends that the meaning of slavery is vague. Of course, there are a few fringe issues–debt slavery, human trafficking, indentured servitude, employer coercion–but there is no real confusion over what slavery is, and there *should be* no hesitation in condemning it in all its forms. Brown’s only point appears to be to gin up false complexity in order to whitewash slavery in Islam.
At one point, for instance, he compares slavery in Islam *favorably* against marriage in modern America. He then goes on to sneer at the entire concept of freedom.
That this is going on at a major American university is utterly appalling.
If we want to see what slavery *really* looks like in Islam, all we have to do is look at those enslaved for generations in Mauritania; at Christians seized and enslaved in Sudan, and at Christians and Yezidi girls used and sold as sex slaves in the Islamic State.
*This* is what the superficially civilized Jonathan Brown is paving the way for here.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/02/arent-you-tired-of-writing-your-stupid-articles-georgetown-prof-jonathan-brown-expels-critic-from-lecture/comment-page-1#comment-1614052
David Scoltock says
Arab slavery was not on racial lines?
Someone should educate this chap on the Janissaries, an entire slave class drawn only from Eastern European nations.
gravenimage says
Or in Africa, where Arabs were behind the sub-Saharan slave trade, and where Arab Muslims still enslave blacks in places like Sudan.
Terry says
Back a little over 20 years ago, at a doctor’s office, I picked up a ( then) current issue of Time or Newsweek or similar.
THE LEAD STORY was about SLAVERY IN MAURITANIA. (CURRENTLY- THEN- now this was the tail end of the 20th century).
ALL of the slaves were black. I doubt if much has changed.
By the way-IN THE US- DURING THE DAYS OF SLAVERY:
1. It existed in the north also, but was more limited-due to the fact that the north has harsh winters, ( and this was the pre-industrial age)and expensive to keep slaves-who produced nothing fro half the year (approximately).
2. In the north (probably the south also)- BUT ALMOST ALWAYS IGNORED: THERE WERE BLACK SLAVE OWNERS.
I remember reading, by a black author, about how his family talked about another black family, in the 1800’s (pre-Civil War) in OHIO who had black slaves. (I cannot recall the book; but that was the first I ever heard about slavery in the north, also)
gravenimage says
Yes–almost 20% of the population of Mauritania is enslaved.
And you are correct that there were some black slave owners in the US, both in the South and outside it.
jewdog says
I guess if you apply to a job at Georgetown you can list slave ownership on your resume, as long as you’re Muslim. I bet this prof would make a good house servant – treated well of course, meals and board included, secured with an electronic leg monitor.
Champ says
Get out of our country you traitor. This evil perp is teaching criminal behavior and should be fired asap. And if I could buy him a one-way ticket to the middle east I WOULD. How/why is he getting away with teaching such students to be criminals unhindered just blows my mind–crazy!
Stendec says
Jihad is the primary duty, collectively and individually, of Muslims. So every doctrine and concept in Islam is designed to bolster the Jihad,” to bolster the prime imperative to purify the world by attacking and subjugating the infidel and by obliterating his culture. The “greater jihad” is always deceptively touted as being noble and nice, because it is supposedly about self-improvement. But like everything in Islam, self-improvement does not mean what you, the gullible infidel, think it means. It does not mean become a better person by becoming a good neighbor and a better contributor to society. Rather, it means become a better person (only Muslims are defined as persons; infidels are the “vilest of created beings”) by becoming a more effective lesser jihadist. To wit: To develop your physique so you become a better head chopper and stone thrower (for stoning adulteresses). To develop your oratory skills so you can become better at spreading dawa and taqiyya. To develop your scientific and engineering skills so you can become a better bomb maker, and can design new infidel killing techniques. And, most of all, to deaden your human instinct for empathy with other human beings so you can be a better throat slitter, a better crucifier, a better “bury them aliver,” a better honor killer of your own daughters, and a better infidel mass-murderer. Once you have thus self-improved yourself, you become a better “slave of Allah,” with shark eyes and cold-blooded determination to dominate and kill. The “greater jihad” is not some nice, or passive, aspect of Islam. There are no nice, or passive, aspects of Islam. Everything about it is terror-inducing, and aggressive, by design. End of sermon.
Terry says
He is saying that NON CONSENSUAL SEX IS OK.
If that is the case, why, (starting-I think) with Barack Obama’s administration- on college campuses throughout the US, if a FEMALE STUDENT SAYS SOMETHING THAT THE FEMALE STUDENT-PERHAPS A DAY OR TWO LATER-DECIDES IS WRONG, OR DEMEANING OR WHATEVER- CAN BRING CHARGES AGAINST THE MALE. NO DUE PROCESS. A KANGAROO COURT- GUILTY UNLESS PROVEN INNOCENT.
The same is true of consensual sex ( both being of age)- if the female later decides it wasn’t good or whatever, it was rape, the male is screwed (not sexually, this time)- again the kangaroo courts, etc.
SO WHY IS THIS PROFESSOR ALLOWED TO SAY/PREACH- THAT IT IS OK?
I realize that he later said slavery is not right- with double talk.
rosemary hopkin says
ThIS fucker needs to be ousted. He IS IS -probably A CLOSET MUSLIM. Domination of WOMWEN probably appeals to him. TWAT.
gravenimage says
rosemary hopkin wrote:
ThIS fucker needs to be ousted. He IS IS -probably A CLOSET MUSLIM.
……………………………
Rosemary, Brown is not a “closet Muslim”–he is quite openly a convert to Islam. Read the story above again.
Anne Smith says
If this man is teaching that rape is permissible should not some official action be taken against him?
Islam the religion of killers says
““Consent isn’t necessary for lawful sex,” and defined consent as a Western concept that emerged with women’s suffrage and female body autonomy. Brown, he said, believes that marital rape was an invalid concept in Islam.”
Brown is teaching / preaching rape,,,,, there must be laws, there must be laws somewhere ?
………………………………………………………………………………….
Sex for Muslim woman must be the most incredible thing,
No water in the oasis,,, nothing but body odor there
Hair all over the face,,, so no pleasure there
Clitorus cut off,,, no pleasure there
Selection of other woman,, so no pleasure there
No choice in the matter,,, so no pleasure there
Foreplay, at least a couple of sentences
And with about 750 million female Muslims in the world,,,,,
the most incredible thing about sex for Muslim woman is how many of them bought it …..
gravenimage says
Recently an Imam told a Muslim woman that her reward if she went to heaven is that her husband would sexually satisfy her.
Nothing a Muslimah can hope for in this world, apparently…
dumbledoresarmy says
Georgetown University.
Okay.
Somebody should have brought up the life story of Saint Josephina Bakhita, who was seized by Muslim slave raiders as a child (her family were killed in the raid), taken from her family, forcibly ‘converted’ to Islam, and would surely have been raped by her various Muslim masters. She was so traumatised that she could not remember her original ‘birth name’, the name given by her non-Muslim parents.
She was *tortured* – branded – by one set of Muslim owners.
Eventually she was bought by an Italian Catholic diplomat then in the Sudan; she became a servant in a Catholic Christian family where she was treated far better than in any of the Muslim households she had previously served; and when she went to Italy with the Italian family **she was set free**. She was no longer a slave. She converted to Christianity and became a Catholic nun, “little brown Mother”, respected and universally beloved. Yet even on her death bed she had flashbacks to her experiences as a slave, crying out about the weight of the chains.
The despicable Mr Brown should have been asked, point blank, whether he thought Sister Bakhita was better off as a terrorised and tortured slave of brutal Muslims, than as a free woman in Italy. Whether he thought the beatings, the rapes, the tortures inflicted on her by her Muslim masters and mistresses, were justified and justifiable. Whether he approves of her having been snatched from her family as a young child, by brutal muslim slave-raiders.
Alternatively, he should have been confronted by some of those Sudanese Christian men who have *experienced* being slaves of Muslims. Imagine if Simon Deng had been able to stand up in that lecture room and confront him. Imagine if one of the Yazidi girls who have emerged from the horror brothels of the Islamic State – which are probably much much more like the historic harems of the dar al Islam, than any rosy fantasy perpetrated by writers of romantic fiction in the west – had been able to stand up in the lecture hall and recount *exactly* what it is like to be used and abused, treated like a *thing*, tormented, degraded, beaten, and raped, raped, raped until your body and mind are shattered.
this man is an agent of Evil.