The latest example of a Muslim cab-driver’s refusal to carry a blind fare’s seeing-eye dog makes timely the reposting of this piece from 2009. Many have wondered at the violent reaction of Muslims to dogs — here is one hypothesis worth pondering:
A recent story in the Reading Evening Mail describes a 71-year-old blind Englishman and cancer sufferer who was asked to get off a bus because of the hysterical reaction to his seeing-eye dog by some Muslims on the bus:
A driver told a blind cancer sufferer to get off his bus when a woman and her children became hysterical at the sight of his guide dog. George Herridge, 71, told how the mum flew into a rage and shouted at him in a foreign language. A passenger explained she wanted him to get off the bus during the incident on May 20.
Mr Herridge, from Tern Close, Tilehurst, said: “Her child was kicking and screaming and someone off the bus told me her child was frightened of my dog. The driver said, ‘Look mate, can’t you get off? I stood my ground. I had not done anything, my dog had not done anything and I was getting off the bus for no one.”
And a day after the latest bus incident a lady began screaming “I don’t like dirty dogs” at Mr Herridge at the Royal Berkshire Hospital.
A week earlier he faced further animosity from a couple at Asda in The Meadway, he said.
He is unsure what has provoked outbursts but said he thinks some have come from Asian people and that it may be due to religious or cultural differences.
Drivers have been re-instructed to convey the blind and the bus company has sought advice from the Royal National Institute for the Blind and hopes to speak with Muslim leaders. As part of a Muslim Council of Britain project, Mufti Zubair Butt, Shar’ia advisor to Muslim Spiritual Care Provision in the NHS, admitted Muslims “require some education” on guide dogs.”
Readers of Jihad Watch are familiar with many similar cases. For example, there are those Somali cab drivers in Minneapolis who refused to pick up blind passengers with seeing-eye dogs.
One needs to know exactly what is going on in all of these cases.
One thing is the extreme reaction that often characterizes Muslims in the Western, Infidel lands when they are being asked merely to accept what is a matter of course in those lands — such as the use of seeing-eye dogs. But for Muslims this does not provoke quiet distaste, but rather a kind of hysteria.
The second is the aggression in Muslim behavior, and demands. For it is clear that in no case was there any attempt to simply get out of the way of the seeing-eye dog; rather, it was the 71-year-old Mr. Herridge who was being asked to leave. And the woman who began shouting at Mr. Herridge, when he was at the Royal Berkshire Hospital, that “I don’t like dirty dogs,” was clearly committing an act of aggression against an elderly blind man. For she might not have liked “dirty dogs,” but she had no need to shout at the blind man who required his dog, and who had a perfect right to his dog, and in whose country this woman had been allowed to settle, though she appears intent on not accommodating herself, but in behaving outrageously toward the indigenes, even the most helpless and vulnerable among them. And when she shouts “I don’t like dirty dogs,” she is attacking Mr. Herridge himself, for she is denouncing his sole source of succor and solace.
Ibn Warraq once told me that while both Jews and Muslims do not eat pork, Jews are completely relaxed about it. No Jew would run rushing out of a restaurant screaming if he happened to discover that pork was on the menu. But Muslims would, and do. And it is the same with dogs. The hatred of dogs is not rational. It is simply based on the slavish acceptance of Muhammad’s strictures, in a well-known Hadith, in which he is reported to have said: “I will not enter a house in which there are pictures and dogs.”
This is a strange, and even mysterious coupling of two items deemed haram: “pictures and dogs.” Why, one may ask? I think I know the reason. Statues, of course, were to be found in homes of Christians, and if those statues are clearly declared to be haram, and if Muslims are told that Muhammad, the Perfect Man (al-insan al-kamil) will not enter a house with pictures (and by extension, statues), then no Muslim would do so either. That would be one bright line to distinguish Muslims from the Christians whose lands they conquered, and it would be one way to impose on those Muslims the duty not to become too friendly with Christians, not to enter their houses where there might still be statuary. And if Christians, in order to allow the members of the ruling Muslim class, to enter their houses, which might for those Christians be a desirable thing (they would need to curry favor with the Muslims who now ruled over them) they might find themselves more willing to themselves do away with statues and icons of every kind.
But why the warning against dogs? It is likely, I have suggested before at Jihad Watch and am suggesting again right now, that because dogs were prized by Zoroastrians, and treated with great affection and reverence, Muslims would want especially to distance themselves from the same practice, even to hold up dogs as objects of hysterical hatred. In so doing, they would again, as with Christians and statuary, clearly distinguish the superior Muslims and their practices from those of the inferior non-Muslims, in this case represented by Zoroastrians.
In Europe, Muslims have already been reported as vandalizing statues. For Islam makes an exception for statuary that has been so vandalized as to have become an object not of veneration but of comical contempt. Then they can be endured. More than thirty years ago, in Beverly Hills, one of the many Al-Saud princelings bought an estate, and on that estate there were many statues. He didn’t destroy the statues, but he painted them grotesque colors, bright blues and greens. And stories were written about this, and pictures taken, and visitors came to gawk. But the great mystery that was never really asked, so certainly not answered was — “Why?” Why did he do it? No one among the reporters covering the story had any idea that statuary was banned in Islam, but that vandalized statuary could remain, as long as it could not possibly be an object of respect or veneration. The ignorance displayed in that small case had no important consequences, unlike the ignorance of Islam that so many among our rulers, among those who claim to understand the world (and that includes Islam), display. They claim to be able to protect and even instruct us, and yet do not know the first thing about Islam. It is extraordinary, and maddening, and frustrating, and they never seem to think they should be embarrassed by this colossal mental lapsus, nor do anything to remedy it.
It was recently reported that in the heavily Islamic municipalities in Turkey, stray dogs are being hunted, tortured, and killed by the hundreds, and that “at least two of the dogs had been sexually abused.” Western newspapers reported that “there is a myth among pious Muslims that dogs are unclean.” But this is nonsense. There is no “myth.” There is simply the Hadith of Muhammad saying he would not enter a house with dogs, and another that says that one’s prayer is invalidated if a dog or a woman passes in front of the man doing the praying. And that means that dogs are haram, forbidden, and that must mean, to most Muslims, that they are “najis” or “unclean.” Why call it a “myth” and not a teaching derived from the Sunna (that is, from the Hadith that form much of the written record of the Sunna)?
Muslim attitudes toward dogs, and the fiendish cruelty with which, in Muslim Iran, Zoroastrians and their dogs are treated, have been described by the leading historian of Zoroastrianism, Mary Boyce:
In Sharifabad the dogs distinguished clearly between Moslem and Zoroastrian, and were prepared to go…full of hope, into a crowded Zoroastrian assembly, or to fall asleep trustfully in a Zoroastrian lane, but would flee as before Satan from a group of Moslem boys…The evidence points…to Moslem hostility to these animals having been deliberately fostered in the first place in Iran, as a point of opposition to the old (pre-Islamic jihad conquest) faith (i.e., Zoroastrianism) there. Certainly in the Yazdi area…Moslems found a double satisfaction in tormenting dogs, since they were thereby both afflicting an unclean creature and causing distress to the infidel who cherished him. There are grim…stories from the time (i.e., into the latter half of the 19th century) when the annual poll-tax (jizya) was exacted, of the tax gatherer tying a Zoroastrian and a dog together, and flogging both alternately until the money was somehow forthcoming, or death released them. I myself was spared any worse sight than that of a young Moslem girl…standing over a litter of two-week old puppies, and suddenly kicking one as hard as she could with her shod foot. The puppy screamed with pain, but at my angry intervention she merely said blankly, ‘But it’s unclean.’ In Sharifabad I was told by distressed Zoroastrian children of worse things: a litter of puppies cut to pieces with a spade-edge, and a dog’s head laid open with the same implement; and occasionally the air was made hideous with the cries of some tormented animal. Such wanton cruelties on the Moslems’ part added not a little to the tension between the communities.”
So if you seek an explanation for Muslim cabdrivers in Minneapolis refusing to pick up blind American passengers with their seeing-eye dogs, or why in England 71-year-old Mr. Herridge was asked to leave a bus because a Muslim child became hysterical, and his mother, instead of calming him, or taking herself and her child off the bus, apparently encouraged the driver to insist that Mr. Herridge get off, you need not wonder or think it is based on some “myth” that “some Muslims” believe. Hatred of dogs as “unclean” is standard in Islam. And it comes in part from a Hadith that, at the same time, has led to the banning, in Islam, of all statuary. Hence that Hadith not only spells trouble for all dogs, and dog-owners, in the Infidel world, beginning but not ending with the blind and their seeing-eye dogs, but it also spells trouble for the statuary all over Western Europe. For what happened to the Bamiyan Buddhas, and hundreds of thousands or perhaps millions of other statues destroyed over 1350 years of Muslim rule?
And all because someone somewhere along the isnad-chain decided that Muhammad had denounced dogs and pictures, and that of course was done in order to distinguish Muslims from, and to encourage their hatred for, statue-loving Christians and dog-loving Zoroastrians.
Would that those in power began to study Islam, began to ponder what the ideology of Islam, its politics and geopolitics, its Muslim and Arab supremacism, really means for the world’s Infidels, their art, their science, their freedoms, their statues — and even their dogs.

miriamrove says
In Iran a lot of people have dogs but they try not to bring them outside for the fear of moral police not only about getting arrested but also losing their dogs. Yes the police, military and law enforcement all German Shaperds! m
Frank Anderson says
The obvious conclusion that must be drawn from this and all similar accounts is the Muslims are coming here to take over. They are not coming here to peacefully co-exist or assimilate, which is completely opposed by their final, perfect and unchangeable teaching. They come here and to European countries to conquer. See, e.g. Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, Spencer, and Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration. Hitler had his collaborators; Now Muslims have theirs.
There is no reason, justification or excuse for people to lie to our faces about the actions and motivations we see daily. Time to take note who is blowing the smoke in our faces and to support people who are willing to deal with the REAL truth before the future is lost for centuries or longer. Do you want your grandchildren to live the way Muslims want to force?
stan lee says
There also have been occasions with some Muslim taxi drivers, to refuse fair passengers carrying packaged alcoholic beverages, obviously if the cab driver recognizes packages containing alcoholic beverages. If they ask about it, and the passenger indicates that the package does contain alcoholic beverage, the fair is refused that taxi service and is back at a curb waving for a taxi.
I suppose depending upon the availability of taxis in a given area, potential passengers would be irate to find the only taxi available has narrow parameters for passenger selection.
Personally, if it was me being refused because my dog was accompanying me, or ride refused because I was boarding the taxi out front of a package liquor/wine store, I would rather wait to hail down a taxi driven I believed was not a Muslim. After all, taxis are usually licensed by state or city bureaus of commercial taxi licensing agencies for the expressed reason to offer commercial taxi services. I haven’t heard of any state /city licensing which precludes passengers with canines or packaged alcoholic beverages. What’s next, taxis with lit signs atop them identifying the taxi as “halal?”
dwight hogg says
A Muslim protest in Toronto -, Muslims carried their Hamas, Hezbollah and ISIS flags through the streets, their faces contorted in blind hatred and anger and shouting threats against Jews and infidels. A man walking his dog was accosted and his dog kicked. The police reaction was to tell the man and the members of the media to leave the area or they would be locked up. My peace be upon them.
Ned Kelly says
I saw the video of this, after attacking the dog owner, the dog returned + attacxked the Muslim, biting him badly, till the owner dragged him away, the Muslims were afraid of the dog.
Anne Smith says
Good dog, defending his master.
DFD says
I once read, I don’t recall where, it was decades ago, that while Mohamed was in Mecca there was a particular, small black dog, which couldn’t stand the sight of him. And on more than one occasion he had to make a runner, ’cause the doggy was chasing him. (not exactly dignifying for a prophet…)
That wouldn’t or doesn’t surprise me, dogs are frequently very good at recognizing the truth, or the soul (or whatever you want to call it) in people.
Consider here the abundance of stories were wolves have reared human young, Romulus and Remus are one well known story/myth. Consider also that when dogs, and even wolves, make friends with humans, they defend the human if necessary to their own death.
You can’t have a truer friend than a dog. They often pick you as a friend first. Mine did, I didn’t realize it at first.
That Mohamed was hated by dogs, and that he in turn hated them for this, makes perfectly sense to me.
Mac-101 says
DFD I believe you are correct. Most likely Mohammad was hated by dogs, they can sense evil and therefore liked only cats as pets. Add to the fact that dogs warned caravans of the impeding Muslim raid would be another reason he would hate dogs. Anyone who hates dogs is a sick evil person and should be removed from a civilized nation. Dogs are the perfect example on Honesty, Trust and Loyalty. All traits lacking in Muslims!
Arthur says
Mohammad comes across as a textbook sociopath. Sociopaths, looking to get their joy out of torturing something in order to give them a sense of complete control, often torture animals like dogs. I suspect dogs quickly learn the non-verbal cues that someone is looking to harm them and react defensively. So, it would seem logical that dogs would not like Mohammad, and Mohammad would not like dogs.
It would be interesting to get videos of Muslims beating, killing, or torturing dogs and run an advertising campaign against animal cruelty with them. As long as the religious affiliation of the perpetrator is clearly evident in the video, one need not say anything more than the behavior is condemned and must stop. The (truthful) association would begin to grow in people’s minds.
davej says
They take great pleasure in insulting and vandalizing anything held sacred by infidels, or even things that are pleasurable to infidels, such as music, dogs, wine or depictions of beautiful women. (Yet seized jihadi laptops are typically full of hard core pornography).
They don’t stick to their own rules but insist that everyone else must, even those of other religions, atheists or those who find Islam to be intolerant and hateful. Nasty bunch of two faced control freaks.
Expat88 says
When I lived in Saudi Arabia they used to chase the dogs out of the city and throw rocks at them. The one dog that they ever tolerated was the Saluki Arab dog that some of the bedoins used in their lifestyle with sheep and camel herds. That was an exception.
The people there didn’t seem to have much respect for any kind of animal and they barely tolerated cats because supposedly Mohammad liked cats. But there were lots of stray cats that were not in good shape that were all around the city and were quite pathetic. Some of the Arab women were phobic and afraid of any animals and became hysterical even over a pet cat if they encountered it.
al norm says
Here are a few facts from the frontline to add:
Dogs are tolerated if they are working dogs – guarding goats and the like
If a dog touches them they cannot go to prayer but have to clean themselves numerous times
Black dogs have the djinn of the devil in them
Mo was a cat person – they believe he had a pet cat.
The conclusion is to use black dogs against Jihadis ( the Israelis already know this). Also they do not know how to deal with dogs. Even a small dog will terrify the women.
EmHotep says
In Turkey islamist hate dogs, they kill them by poisoning, by hammers, by pulling with cars and so on. Why because muhammed hate dogs and said if there is a dog at home allah’s angels will not enter. Islamist actually hate everything even a simple smile can be an offence to them.
They also love torturing animals… Watch it there is no penalty for this;
Keith Gilbert says
I have a beautiful medically prescribed service dog, she is a 90 lb. German Shepherd…trained in Germany and responds to commands in several languages…none of them islamic. I have found it good sport to go into Safeway and other grocery stores (she must be admitted) and basically ‘herd’ the islamic filth before us…given the opportunity I’ll walk her close enough to a muzzie to let her waging tail brush them; once went into a Halal grocery store with her…the male clerks literally got up onto their counter…and I was very nice all the while asking about some of their hot sauces which are, by the way, quite good. My precious black German Shepherd Dog is better than carrying a .45 pistol…and probably deadlier.
Yes, I despise these evil people, all of them, there are no exceptions…they want to kill me…others tried and failed and now I’m too old to really give a shit about their intent…my will is stronger than theirs.
LR says
Keith…
Just want to point out, that there are those Muslims who have put their lives on the line, worked with our military and saved lives.
Not all of them want to kill you.
Angemon says
Don’t worry, lady, I suspect the dog doesn’t like you either – he may drink from the toilet and eat vomit, but damn it, he has standards!
Cecilia Ellis says
?
Shmooviyet says
Lols here too.
The dog was no doubt too well-behaved to bark back at her.
Dogs are angels to their suffering people; my Sammy was a lifesaver after multiple surgeries.
Mark Swan says
All Righty Then—that made me laugh—thanks Angemon.
overman says
What sort of bus-driver would ask a blind man to get of a bus because of some mad hysterical muslim [unless he was a muslim too]..
Yes, lt’s apparently because the Archangel Gabriel wouldn’t go into mohammeds’ house, one day, because angels don’t enter a house where there’s a dog or a picture of a living creature – give me a break lol.
l believe some places [lran] it’s 75 lashes for walking a dog [some do have pets] and the dog is also killed.
l’d put a dog, or any animal, before a muslim, anyday.
” DOGS STOP THE ANGELS
From Bukhari Vol. 4, #448
Narrated Abu Talha: “I heard Allah’s Apostle saying; “Angels (of Mercy) do not enter a house wherein there is a dog or a picture of a living creature (a human being or an animal).””
From Bukhari Vol. 7, #843
Narrated Salim’s father: “Once Gabriel promised to visit the Prophet but he delayed and the Prophet got worried about that. At last he came out and found Gabriel and complained to him of his grief (for his delay). Gabriel said to him, “We do not enter a place in which there is a picture or a dog.””
From Muslim, #5276:
Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger as saying: Angels do not accompany the travelers who have with them a dog and a bell.
From Muslim, #5279:
Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger as saying: “The bell is the musical instrument of Satan.”
COMMENT
The story behind these hadith was mentioned earlier. A little puppy stopped an angel from entering the house because it was “unclean”. Note that angels do not enter a place with a dog, or accompany people who travel with a dog”
l think the last sentence might explain the bus incident with the blind man –
‘or accompany people who travel with a dog’
Dexter L. Wilson says
In the United States, to single out a person with a service dog, and try to tell them to leave the dog outside, you can be arrested and you can be fined. See what happens when the elderly services ever see someone mistreat a person with a service dog. You want to get sued go ahead see what happens. I was warned by my supervisor about never assuming a dog with someone inside a restaurant or business was not a service animal because the service animal even though they may not be on a chain or handle, the person may suffer from heart problems or fits that the animal is used to sense such conditions therefore I was not to tell them to remove such animals since I was a health inspector. So Muslims, keep that in mind unless you want to be sued or arrested in the US.
Westman says
It would seem that a successful way to stop up those illegal prayer groups, who enjoy blocking the streets in France to have their numbers seen, would be the police walking a service dog past the front of the group.
Michael Casmer says
Where are those groups who protested that dentist who killed a lion recently? Why aren’t they protesting the treatment of animals?
Frank Anderson says
In everywhere/or at least most places in present conflict, the police are more likely to arrest anyone with a dog than they are to bring a dog. In the US it would be interesting to see how an Americans With Disabilities Act suit against the cab company and driver would progress through the courts and licensing bodies. Cabs, like many other business establishments are “public accommodations” which had better have a really good reason for practicing discriminatory conduct. See, e.g. Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964). Not only is the company and driver at risk for damages, but also ATTORNEY FEES. Make the law work for a change.
Anne Smith says
In England there have been a number of instances of Muslim taxi drivers refusing to take people with guide dogs. Not one of them has lost his licence, even though this behaviour is in breach of the law.
Taxi driving is one of the (few) occupations that Muslims do in great numbers.
The Rotherham rape scandals were facilitated by Muslim taxi drivers who used to transport the victims from school gates to “parties” where they were raped. Some drivers also participated. When – sometime after the scandal broke – the useless Rotherham Council decided to put CCTV cameras into the cabs the Muslim drivers, predictably, all rioted against it. The idea was quietly shelved.
citycat says
The cctv is like the eye of a picture. Some muslims have said that the eyes of a picture can act as a portal through which ‘other’ beings may spy on them, or have a ‘influence’ upon the person present there.
Noah T says
“Dirty”Dogs are much cleaner than Muslims. Dogs could possibly be put to use to fight the Jihad. There should be dogs and pigs put on every airplane and in other terrorist targets. In Israel, they once wanted to put pigs on every bus to put a stop to the bus bombings that were occurring very frequently.
Twerzig says
To be fair dogs do carry disease. Hydatids particularly and also Rabies. Having large numbers of wild Dogs is a recipe for trouble. But other domestic animals also carry disease. Cattle carry tuberculosis and Brucellosis and it will endemic in most of these countries.
But inspite of this Dogs make wonderful friends. My cousin says that Dogs came with us. Meaning they have been our friends for 100 thousand years. It may be that normal social development requires interaction with furry creatures.
My old man kept dogs but he also beat them. Their was something wrong with my old man.
Phil Horaia says
The Muslim attitude towards animals in general stinks. Not much gets me angry but cruelty to animals does. I’ve just been reading an article http://www.barenakedislam.com/2017/02/01/what-do-you-wanna-bet-this-dog-was-mutilated-by-muslims-too/ about a dog that has had its ears and nose cut off and there are other injuries. In all likelihood it’s been done by the Allah wackjobs. The religion makes savages of people and attracts scum to it.
davmc says
I live in the UK and being dog lovers we have millions of dogs.I cannot understand why muslims still live and move here as to them the whole country is unclean.We stroke and hug dogs and the natural oils rub off on our hands and clothes.Part of these oils are absorbed by the skin.When we touch something after stroking we leave some of these oils behind for the next person to take up.Cash machine buttons,door iandles,supermarkets trolleys and stock.Any muslim coming after us is contaminated.Do they become infedels?
Then you have to dogs droppings,yes they are wiped up but a residue is left behind and trod around and taken indoors.Children playing on the floor would come in contact as would children playing on the grassPlus childrens play in the park on the grass.
Of course,bacon and sausage sanwichs,pork pie and scratchings residues are a whole new ball game too
davmc says
Sorry for spelling mistakes,not checked before posting.
TH says
It’s the whacky religion they have invented by a primitive maniac. The Bible, in its very first chapter about the creation of the world, states that God saw that all He had created is good. If Allah HATES all those who refuse to submit to Mahommed’s weird cult, then it should be no surprise that they would hate dogs.
reyol says
All true and especially true for money — which they love so much!
dumbledoresarmy says
Here are two articles that illustrate just why the Mohammedan ban on dogs and brainwashing of humans to *hate*, abuse and despise them, is so abominable, and indeed, perverse and deeply antihuman.
Here is the first, about the symbiosis of humans and dogs. We have been together so long that we are genetically programmed to ‘relate’. (The same point was made in a documentary I and my family recently watched. Put a young human child and a puppy together, and they will ‘connect’ very quickly and easily; it’s as if they are pre-programmed to notice and ‘bond’ with each other).
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-30/mans-friendship-with-dogs-may-be-genetic,-new-study-suggests/7893206
And here is the second, a sweet little story from Australia about a beautiful black part-Labrador dog – a dog that Muslims would view as “the devil” – who has become very much the guardian angel of a child who suffers from Autism.
Click on the link, read it, and just look at the picture of the dog.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-31/autism-assistance-dogs-for-children-can-turn-family-life-around/8223710
How an autism assistance dog turned a family’s life around
Florida Jim says
Th world must change to accommodate muslim’s or they will behead everyone, isn’t this their threat?
Alex says
I walk my beautiful and friendly dog twice a day for 40 minutes, every day of the year. On the pathways and sidewalks, I have crossed *hundreds* of Muslims showing high contempt at the sight of my dog (their facial and body language doesn’t lie). In many cases, they walk around in a wide circle fashion just to be sure my dog won’t touch them. I have started barking at those ones just to see their reaction and believe me, it’s a lot of fun. Even funnier, my dog has recently started barking at them too! Good dog.
BC says
Personally I do not like dogs having been subjected to unprovoked attacks twice, I do not trust them. However I know they are very popular with most people. This exposes the outright bigotry of Muslims,
who do not care about anything except their own righteousness. It is their business not to like dogs or statues, alcohol or pig products, it is not their business to impose their objections to these things on non Muslims but of course they like to. In any case the matter of pork and alcohol is not to consume them, not to refuse to accept their presence. Taxi drivers, transport drivers and cashiers in shops should just do their job and not force their prejudices on non Muslims.
common sense says
Labrador retrievers can be trained to sniff out cancer in a person of course they can identify a “sneaky rat”.
I’ve seen him identify the selfish, smug person the room multiple times. Usually by using his snout to gently ram the persons legs or jump up in their face which he never does.
I love my Lab and he loves my family, woe to those who’d harm a dog.
Aardvark says
What a tremendous pity that mohammed didn’t say ‘I will not enter a country that has dogs or pictures’.
It would have saved us all a great deal of grief!
reyol says
Ultimately, it’s all about sticking it to the infidel. Some Mohammedans genuinely have canine phobia due to their culture. But others know it’s not about the dog: it’s about the dog lover; it’s about making Islam supreme.
b.a. freeman says
islam is repulsive and evil beyond the comprehension of westerners; i can see few other explanations for the *COMPLETE* lack of knowledge of islam among non-muslims in the west. most of us don’t bother checking things out, even though the internet has made that quite a bit easier than going to the local public library; since most of us aren’t running the country, that’s not really a problem.
the people who are running the country should know better; instead, they cry crocodile tears and claim that those who speak out against the evils of islam need to become better people and stop being haters. one would think that leftist leaders would have somebody prepare a detailed report showing these rightist idiots that islam really is a religion of peace. of course, one would also think that a rational leftist (if there is such a thing) would question why there is no such report, and go looking for himself so as to put idiot rightists in their place when they start hating islam.
maybe it just means that there are two kinds of leftists: those who were educated into it, and don’t think about the consequences of their actions too much, unless their favorite celebrity is advocating for or against something, and the hard-core leftists, the true believers, who coldly plot to seize power in their nation, regardless of who will die, or how many will die.
Frank Anderson says
my sincere compliments for your post.
Boghos L. Artinian says
The Turks were the pioneers in torturing dogs
In 1911, in an event called “Hayırsızada Dog Massacre”, the Governor of Istanbul ordered the stray dogs in the streets to be rounded up and exiled to Sivriada. About 80,000 dogs were killed during the ordeal, mostly due to hunger and thirst on the barren land of the island, and some due to drowning as they tried to escape the horrible conditions of the island. A severe earthquake which immediately followed the event was perceived by the local as “a punishment by God for abandoning the dogs.” That is why the island is known both as Sivriada and Hayırsızada (“the useless island”).[2][3][4][5]
References