• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Murder victim’s father denies killing was jihad terror: “He said ‘Allahu akbar.’ It’s a bit like me saying I’m Jesus Christ.”

Feb 8, 2017 1:33 pm By Robert Spencer

In reality, it is nothing whatsoever like saying, “I’m Jesus Christ.” “Allahu akbar” is often mistranslated in the Western media as “God is great.” But the actual meaning is “Allah is greater,” meaning Allah Is Greater Than Your God or Government. It is the aggressive declaration that Allah and Islam are dominant over every other form of government, religion, law or ethic, which is why Islamic jihadists in the midst of killing infidels so often shout it. One primary purpose of shouting is to “strike terror in the hearts of the enemies of Allah” (Qur’an 8:60). See my article in Breitbart about it here.

The other murder victim’s mother wrote: “Much nonsense is being spoken in the press about her alleged killer,” who, she said, “is not an Islamic fundamentalist, he has never set foot in a mosque.” What’s more, “Queensland Police, the Australian Federal Police and the Joint Counter Terrorism Unit … investigated any links between Ayad and radical organisations, and they did not find any evidence of radicalisation.”

This is an example of the prevailing denial and political correctness that hamstrings our approach to jihad terror. Ayad wasn’t carrying an ISIS membership card, and wasn’t going to mosque, and so therefore there was no “evidence of radicalisation,” and President Trump is both stupid and evil to classify these murders as jihad terror. The problem here is that the paradigm that Ayliffe, Jackson, and even the Queensland Police, the Australian Federal Police and the Joint Counter Terrorism Unit are working from is false and erroneous. A Muslim who never goes to mosque and is not otherwise observant may be carrying around a rather large load of guilt. He may know that an easy way to offset all his evil deeds is to perform an act of jihad, as the Qur’an guarantees Paradise to those who “kill and are killed” for Allah (9:111). So in this case, Smail Ayad may indeed have been a bit unbalanced, and unhealthily fixated on Mia Ayliffe-Chung, and troubled by that or any number of other things, and conceived of an easy way to get back into Allah’s good graces: kill her and Tom Jackson. That he stabbed a dog would even be in keeping with this, as Muhammad ordered that dogs be killed: “It was narrated that Abdullah bin Umar said: ‘The Messenger of Allah used to order that dogs be killed, and I went throughout Al-Madinah, and we did not spare any dog but we killed it, to such an extent that we would even kill the dog of a woman belonging to the desert people.'” (Sahih Muslim 4018)

All this doesn’t make Ayad’s murders acts of terrorism akin to 9/11 or Fort Hood or San Bernardino. He probably didn’t think of himself as acting to advance the cause of the Muslim umma, or as an operative of al-Qaeda or the Islamic State. But authorities aren’t even aware of the possibility of killing as an act of personal expiation within Islam, and they should be.

“‘My daughter’s death will not be used’: Parents furious over Trump’s false terrorism claims,” by Avi Selk, Washington Post, February 7, 2017 (thanks to Darcy):

Her daughter had not yet been buried, nor had the newspapers finished turning up bloody details of her death, before Rosie Ayliffe began to write about her child’s murderer.

“Grief is a funny thing,” she wrote in the Independent last August — five days after a man chased her 21-year-old daughter through a hostel, stabbed her to death and killed another backpacker who tried to protect her. “I haven’t seen Mia for nearly a year, and so in my head she’s still alive, well and living in Australia.”

She was careful, even then, to write accurately about the accused killer. Smail Ayad had yelled “Allahu akbar” during the attack, the Guardian reported, but he had also rambled incoherently, stabbed a dog and “was apparently infatuated with” her daughter.

“Much nonsense is being spoken in the press about her alleged killer,” Ayliffe wrote. He “is not an Islamic fundamentalist, he has never set foot in a mosque.”

Likewise, police ruled out terrorism, and the Ayad murder case was transferred to a mental-health court.

The sensational stories eventually faded. The parents of Mia Ayliffe-Chung and Tom Jackson mourned and tried to move on.

Months went by.

Then, on Tuesday, both families saw their children’s murders on a White House list of terrorist attacks that hadn’t gotten enough attention, and Ayliffe said she felt she needed to set down words again.

“My daughter’s death will not be used to further this insane persecution of innocent people,” she wrote in an open letter to President Trump.

Her words were joined by the parents of the attack’s second victim, Jackson, who expressed their disbelief in an email to the White House and elsewhere.

“I’m pretty sure he and his advisors know full well — or could very easily verify — that Tom and Mia died not as the result of an act of terror but rather through the actions of a disturbed individual,” Les Jackson wrote on Facebook.

“Of course, that doesn’t suit his agenda.”

“The fact anyone would want to make something political out of Tom dying is just beyond me,” Jackson told The Washington Post. “We’re still struggling to come to terms with it and probably never will. This has just brought the whole experience of last summer crashing about us.”

The two travelers had barely known each other — or their accused killer — when they intersected last August in a remote Australian hostel where backpackers stopped to raise funds for their travels.

Mia had just started working on a farm — picking up loose rocks, calling her family in England often, “whether it was because she was bored or lonely,” Ayliffe wrote in the Independent.

“Skills achieved; the ability to tell the difference between a rock and a clump of mud and throwing stones really far,” her daughter wrote in one of her last Facebook posts, according to the Guardian.

She had only just met Jackson, another English traveler who had been in the hostel for a few months — determined to see Australia after visiting much of the rest of the world, his father said.

Ayad was staying in the same hostel, writing Facebook posts of a different sort:

“I am victim of an international economic conspiracy. I think that I am going to die,” Ayad once wrote, according to Yahoo News. “Those who love me, follow me.”

The 29-year-old French national was also telling people in the hostel that he planned to marry Mia, the Guardian reported.

Police said they had no romantic relationship before the night of Aug. 23, when others in the hostel said Ayad got a kitchen knife.

“He roused Ayliffe-Chung from her bed and hauled her on to a balcony,” the Guardian reported.

She broke away, wounded, and scrambled through the building, according to the news outlet. Witnesses heard Ayad yelling incoherently as he chased her — “Allahu akbar” among other exclamations — then saw him dive head first from a stairwell, killing a dog and finally cornering his victim in a bathroom.

Jackson tried to help her. They were both stabbed many times. She would die in the hostel, and he a few days later in a hospital.

Early news reports made much of two words spoken during that night’s horror.

“He said ‘Allahu akbar.’ It’s a bit like me saying I’m Jesus Christ,” Les Jackson said. “It was initially reported it could be a terrorist attack, but we never took that seriously and it was quickly disproved.”

Ayliffe said she felt the same. In her first days of grief, she wrote in the Independent about “the TV engineer who visited yesterday [and] said, ‘Well we know what that was about, it was that Moslemic terrorism!’ Thanks for clarifying.”

Investigators ruled out the possibility.

“Queensland Police, the Australian Federal Police and the Joint Counter Terrorism Unit … investigated any links between Ayad and radical organisations, and they did not find any evidence of radicalisation,” the Townsville Bulletin reported.

When she planned her daughter’s funeral, Ayliffe included an Islamic prayer in the schedule — to oppose what she called “the misrepresentation of Mia’s death in the media as an act of terrorism.”…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Australia, Donald Trump, Featured, United Kingdom, Useful idiots, willful ignorance Tagged With: Les Jackson, Mia Ayliffe-Chung, Rosie Ayliffe, Smail Ayad, Tom Jackson


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Mac-101 says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 1:39 pm

    There is little hope left for Democracy when a Religious Fanatic can murder these people children and the parents will not even recognize the cause of their murder because they are too Political Correct!

    • Havoc says

      Feb 8, 2017 at 6:00 pm

      It sounds like another ‘Muslim Attack’ – very difficult to distinguish from the more common ‘Terrorist Atttack’.
      .
      To be safe …
      .
      No Muslims. No Mosques. No Apologies.

    • Custos Custodum says

      Feb 8, 2017 at 11:34 pm

      Clearly some highly paid PR agents worked very hard and very smart behind the scenes to get both parents – Ayliffe and Jackson – to play along and to lend their names to this demeaning Islam-pandering charade.

      The false parallel about “Allahu Akbar” voiced by Les Jackson is precisely the kind of rhetorical trick that PR specialists are paid big bucks for. Almost certainly, this talking point was put to him by a PR flak.

      One can understand that parents become “blind with grief,” and may have found it impossible to resist blandishments about their children’s deaths being given meaning in the fight against the evil American President, fighting discrimination, etc.

      Less charitably, one would say that both parents allowed themselves to become string puppets of the very forces who supported and brought to Australia their children’s deranged killer.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Feb 9, 2017 at 4:04 am

        They need not have been manipulated.

        They are, de facto, Dhimmis.

        They are in a fog of denial; a fog of denial that has been created by a barrage of disinformation, about Islam, about its history, its doctrines, its Founder, that has been poured out in western countries at least since the 1960s and with redoubled force once the petrodollars to finance full-on propaganda and corrupt both media and academe really flooded in in earnest, from 1973 onward.

        If you read Mark Durie’s book “The Third Choice” you will understand what is wrong with them.

    • Anne Smith says

      Feb 9, 2017 at 7:28 am

      Probably because they cannot understand that a single Muslim can decide, off his own bat, to launch a terror attack. They believe “terror” has to be organised from Head Office i.e. ISIS and is part of a wider war, with proper “soldiers” fighting altogether against the enemy.

      Without an informed knowledge of Islam and the teachings of the Quran how could these people understand anyway? It is a difficult concept to grasp for people who have been raised and live in normality.

  2. jayell says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 1:49 pm

    ‘Allahu akbar’ means ‘I’m Jesus Christ.”? Just like “Islam” means “Peace”, as I heard once. I wonder where they get hold of their Arabic-English dictionaries. Reminds me of the Monty Python sketch about the Hungarian tourists and their dubious English phrase-books.

  3. Angemon says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 1:53 pm

    ~

    “He said ‘Allahu akbar.’ It’s a bit like me saying I’m Jesus Christ,” Les Jackson said.

    Yeah, in the same sense that someone being a member of the SS is “a bit like” you being a member of the boyscouts…

  4. Veka Fitzfrancis says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 2:04 pm

    It’s sad that this mother is letting her hatred of Trump overwhelm her common sense.

  5. JawsV says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 2:36 pm

    “Allahu akbar” has nothing whatsoever to do with Jesus Christ (God). The parents of their murdered-by-a-Muslim kids are PC morons.

  6. marina says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 3:25 pm

    Stupid parents. The words “Allahu Akbar” and “Jesus Christ” should not be even in one sentence let alone finding any similarity between these two..

  7. somehistory says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 4:11 pm

    The power of the beast, the power of satan to blind people to the true facts is so great.
    (not in the sense of goodness, but huge, strong).

    This is unreal. And an insult to everything good and virtuous. Screaming that awful phrase of supremacy while killing in murderous rage is nothing like a person of delusion claiming to be Jesus Christ.

    And, I would like to confront those parents who say these young people did not feel *terror* when this moslim slug was chasing and stabbing them to death…while screaming at them.

    It wasn’t a walk in the park, it wasn’t just being assaulted…it was murder and terror was a large part of it.
    Put this ignorant, self-important woman in the place of her daughter and see whether or not she is terrified. Put the man in the place of his son and see if it sounds like Jesus Christ is coming to his aid and comfort.

    These people are saying Trump is *using* their children’s death as political propaganda for his ruling on immigrants. They are the ones using their children’s deaths for their own propaganda and support of people who would also have murdered their children while screaming, IMO, an obscenity. And this too, is obscene.

    • Carolyne says

      Feb 9, 2017 at 9:13 am

      I do not believe in the concept of “The Beast” or satan or whatever, but if he existed, he would certainly be a Muslim.

  8. vladkoval says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 4:15 pm

    “is not an Islamic fundamentalist, he has never set foot in a mosque”

    Of course. Why should he be wasting his time in a mosque if he can redeem his sin of skipping the mosque in a very fast and easy way – by killing (sacrificing!) an infidel?

    • JawsV says

      Feb 8, 2017 at 5:44 pm

      The Muslim went straight to the Koran for his murderous guidance – no need for a mosk.

  9. P2 says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 4:23 pm

    I feel so sorry for this mother. By not facing reality she has found a sort of peace. I can only guess that the truth is too painful for her to consider. She is a textbook example of cognitive dissonance.

  10. Byzantium1683 says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 6:06 pm

    This makes no sense, even coming from Islam, which lacks sense like no other.

    God is Greater=I’m jesus christ.

    All those phrases have in common, is they are three letters long. There is absolutely no connection. I am made dumber for explaining this atrocity of a statement.

    • JawsV says

      Feb 8, 2017 at 11:01 pm

      “Allah is greater.” No way is Allah God.

      Jesus is God.

      Allah is Not.

      • Byzantium1683 says

        Feb 10, 2017 at 12:03 am

        Just as Jesus’s father is a god, yet claims to be the only one, Allah is also a god.

        However, I agree. The god of the Quran has almost no relation to the God of even the old testament.

        Mohammed is like a more twisted version of Joseph Smith, taking already common info (christianity) and trying to make a religion out of it, that seems legitimate enough to be true.

  11. mortimer says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 6:15 pm

    Robert Spencer wrote: “A Muslim who never goes to mosque and is not otherwise observant may be carrying around a rather large LOAD of GUILT. He may know that an easy way to OFFSET all his evil deeds is to perform an ACT OF JIHAD, as the Qur’an guarantees Paradise to those who “kill and are killed” for Allah (9:111).”

    When most Western people understand this, jihad will be half defeated.

    • JawsV says

      Feb 8, 2017 at 11:03 pm

      But, “Western people” have suddenly become ostriches in the 21st century. They understood Fascism and Nazism well enough – why not Islam? Why the Western REFUSAL to understand simple Islam and Jihad?

  12. Max Publius says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 6:54 pm

    What disgusting parents to de facto side with the killer against their own dead children. They know nothing about Islam, like so many others, but they even now, after their children are dead, STILL refuse to investigate the possibility of a religious murder. Pathetic and evil they have become, just like the killer. No sympathy for them if they display such wanton ignorance and cluelessness.

    Let’s not get hung up on the word terrorist, i.e., a member of an organized cell. Islam is a supremacist ideology, and any Muslim in a fit of rage against non-Muslims may be triggered to kill, organized or not. There are next to no mitigating verses or forces to stop him. It’s always been this way, read your history! In the Islamic world, murdering a non-Muslim is a traffic ticket compared to murdering a fellow Muslim.

    • JawsV says

      Feb 8, 2017 at 11:05 pm

      The mother had Islamic prayers at her daughter’s funeral!!! It’s unbelievable! What’s wrong with these people???

      • Custos Custodum says

        Feb 8, 2017 at 11:39 pm

        Clearly the mother has been “gotten to” by some very smart PR guys. See post above.

      • carol says

        Feb 12, 2017 at 9:05 pm

        I think the mother was objectively convinced other factors were at work and since her daughter had an open-minded attitude toward differences she wished to honor that.

        Robert Spencer’s point is one that more people should be aware of but I think readers here are more inclined to expect the worst in regard to denial. Reading a handful of articles there is oddly no mention of his or his family’s religion or ethnic background . The name is Middle-eastern but they say he never attended a mosque. He shows signs of schizophrenia, is a champion kick-boxer, had been smoking – likely marijuana – just hours before the attack, sang the Marseillaise before ranting and attacking the girl (one account says he DID say Allahu Akbar when arrested). Police have been bitten and harmed and are having a very hard time handling him. I suspect the phrase was just part of his colorful bag of emotions.

  13. Angry Aussie says

    Feb 8, 2017 at 7:50 pm

    I’m in Queensland. It is very much viewed as an act of terrorism despite what the media, police and parents say. Australians are not stupid. Some of our political elite may be, but for the better part, the rest of us are not.

    • Anne Smith says

      Feb 9, 2017 at 7:31 am

      Well perhaps you should vote in some politicians who are more in tune with your way of thinking.

      Go Pauline Hanson!

  14. Jean-Francois Morf says

    Feb 9, 2017 at 3:28 am

    Allahu Akbar means: Satan is greater (then God+Jesus Christ).
    Satan is unique, intolerant, and want to kill all christians and all jews: Satan is Allah!
    Google: Allah Satan

  15. dumbledoresarmy says

    Feb 9, 2017 at 4:18 am

    This is being gleefully reported by our Islamophile dhimmified ABC, as well.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-08/mia-ayliffe-chungs-mother-criticises-white-house-terrorism-claim/8250410

    And the *son* of Curtis Cheng, who was murdered by a black-clad allahu-akbaring Muslim youth who *had* come *straight* from a mosque – who had indeed set foot in a mosque directly prior to the killing, a mosque at which he had *received a weapon** – is *also* railing against Trump and denying, point blank, that the murder of his father was an act of jihad terrorism.

    It is crazy, and it is also incredibly sad.

  16. dumbledoresarmy says

    Feb 9, 2017 at 4:27 am

    From the article – “Much nonsense is being spoken in the press about her alleged killer,” Ayliffe wrote. He “is not an Islamic fundamentalist, he has never set foot in a mosque.”

    NEVER??

    Never never never? Never in his life? Or ‘never’ whilst he was in Australia?

    How can she claim, so categorically, that that is the case?

    How on earth could she possibly know?

    He might not have been to any mosques whilst in Australia – though, how would one find out? – suppose he *had*, does anyone here believe for one second that any mosque mobsters would ever acknowledge, in public, that he *had*?? Muslims lie, Muslims lie, Muslims lie.

    Did the French homeland security people have a record of his movements for his entire life before he came to Australia? Did *they* tell her he had never been to a mosque, not ever?

    I would be prepared to bet good money that, even if he stayed away from mosques whilst in Australia, he probably DID visit a mosque, every now and again, whilst in France.

    There *is* also something else. Have not some jihad organisations, quite recently, explicitly *told* their operatives to behave exactly as “Smail Ayad” behaved? – To behave in an *un*-Islamic manner – *including staying away from contact with mosques* – so as to allay suspicion during the lead-up to an attack? (And provide plausible deniablilty for the ummah, precisely as we see in play in this particular case)?

    • Carolyne says

      Feb 9, 2017 at 9:17 am

      These parents are overwhelmed by guilt and are desperate to find a reason their child was needlessly killed. The mother couldn’t possibly know the life story of this Muslim, whether he ever went to a mosque or not. I feel sorry for her that in her grief, she has become blind.

  17. FatherJon says

    Feb 9, 2017 at 4:54 am

    One only has to read Ayad’s entries on his Facebook page to see that he carried the usual Muslim chip on his shoulders. Whether he took direct orders from Al-Baghdadi or was just self-motivated is irrelevant. He saw himself as a jihadi serving the will of Allah.

  18. Buford says

    Feb 9, 2017 at 11:38 am

    That Father is a sick S O B & is proof of why the Quran is a bunch of BS anytime one of these creatures decides to start killing they start out with that Allah Snackbar Crap partition off part of the Desert in Syria & give it to these Monsters & stop them from coming to Western Countries they are like Cuntzoo vines in the South once they get started they take over

  19. Glen says

    Feb 9, 2017 at 6:00 pm

    I heard the dead girl’s mother recently interviewed on the BBC radio 5 live afternoon slot. She came across as very condescending in a way that only liberal elites can be, particularly towards the UK public, and was scathing toward Trump.

    She said that her daughter was seeking cultural enlightenment and was gaining knowledge of the world seemingly suggesting that your average Brit is a backward, knuckle dragging luddite who just doesn’t understand the real islam or its followers.

    Her every word was straight out of the BBC manual of deception and lies, in fact it could have been penned by the BBC’s chief appeaser, Nicky Campbell, himself, or, in fact, 99.99% of BBC employees. The interview was a stain on her daughter’s life, it was excrutiating, is she that blind that she believes that spouting her hoilier than thou garbage on the BBC would make people look at muslims in a different light?

    I feel pity for this woman’s daughter, what did she die for? What was the point of her short life? Did she die so that her mother and the liberal MSM could prove a point? The liberal scum would use any tragedy to further their warped ideology. How many people did we see interviewed after the Bataclan massacre spouting the same appeasing shite. What a waste of a life.

    This woman didn’t deserve to have a child as nice as her daughter seemingly was, she said she was grieving but I felt that disproving the motive of her killer was more important, I just don’t get people like this, maybe the situation has given her some comfort, who knows? Maybe she needed to make some sort of sense of her child’s death and religion isn’t cutting it?

    Either way I’m glad that this country didn’t have the same attitude when the Nazi’s came knocking or this post would have been written in words of a Germanic form.

  20. Jackson03 says

    Feb 9, 2017 at 7:56 pm

    “Allahu akbar” is often mistranslated in the Western media as “God is great.” But the actual meaning is “Allah is greater,” meaning Allah Is Greater Than Your God or Government. It is the aggressive declaration that Allah and Islam are dominant over every other form of government, religion, law or ethic, . . . ”

    I’ve read or heard “Allahu akbar” a thousand times over the past years and have never heard or read it properly translated as it is here. I’ve often noted the correct translation when the subject comes up with acquaintances, but the implications of the true meaning simply goes over peoples’ heads. Poor America.

  21. garegin says

    Feb 10, 2017 at 6:52 am

    I’ve heard this moronic argument before. Oh yeah, Christians kill too, what’s the difference? The difference is that people don’t scream RELIGIOUS SLOGANS when shooting up a deli for cash.
    Jealous guys don’t say “Christ is Lord” when attacking someone. If Muslims want to stop people calling these crimes religiously motivated- they should stop using religious language when commiting them.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Infidel on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • gravenimage on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Infidel on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • iconoclast123 on India: Police make first arrest for ‘love jihad’ under new law
  • gravenimage on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.