• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

University of San Francisco in uproar, persecutes former student for Snapchat “Allah akbar” emoji

Feb 1, 2017 8:27 am By Christine Douglass-Williams

A huge controversy erupted at the University of San Francisco over a student, “Rachel,” who has since graduated and moved out of the state, because of her “Snapchat shot of a young woman wearing a headscarf with an emoji of a bomb in her hand and the caption ‘Allah Akbar.’”

The law school dean’s office went so far as to contact Rachel, shaming her into a letter of apology, in which she stated her “heartfelt disappointment” in herself and “remorse” for the Snapchat emoji. This heavy-handedness from USF officials is redolent of Mao’s China during the Cultural Revolution.

The USF administration wildly overreacted. Its action comes against the backdrop of the serious and virulent anti-Semitism that is ubiquitous on campuses across America. Not far from USF, San Francisco State University recently partnered with a major Palestinian university, An-Najah National University in the West Bank, which is known for its support for and recruitment of jihadi terrorists.

Instead of reflecting on and taking action against that anti-Semitism, USF officials acted so harshly against Rachel as part of their bending over backwards to foster good relations with the Muslim community. “A national conference on Jesuit higher education’s relationship to Islam and Muslims” was held in 2015 at USF with the objective of “bringing together faculty and staff working on issues of Islam, Muslims, and Christian-Muslim relations at Jesuit colleges and universities across the country.”

“‘Allah Akbar’ and a bomb emoji prompt uproar at USF”, by Matier & Ross, San Francisco Chronicle, January 25, 2017:

A former student’s Snapchat shot of a young woman wearing a headscarf with an emoji of a bomb in her hand and the caption “Allah Akbar” prompted the University of San Francisco law school to schedule a community discussion on sensitivity Thursday night.

Under the school’s nonacademic student code, the image “is considered an ‘act of intolerance,’” USF law school officials said in an email to students. They said it had been brought to their attention by a group of students who considered it a negative depiction of Muslims and asked USF to respond.

Even though the former student — identified only as Rachel — has graduated and moved out of state, the USF law school dean’s office contacted her. And in short order, she issued a letter of apology, stating her “heartfelt disappointment” in herself and “remorse” for her actions.

In the letter, Rachel said she had posted the image “for four seconds.” When a friend alerted her of the “harm she could possibly cause,” she wrote, she tried to take it down — only to discover that a screen shot of the image had already been reposted on Facebook.

“I was blocked from the user(s) who posted the photo and I was unable to promptly issue a clarifying response and apology,” Rachel wrote.

The law school said Thursday night’s forum would be a chance for people to “share reflections” on how the image affected them. In the email, administrators told students that if they witness an act of intolerance, “please file a report”….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: "Islamophobia", academia, Featured, free speech, United States Tagged With: University of San Francisco


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Angemon says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 9:13 am

    “Rachel” was obviously wrong – the sentence should have been “allahu akbar”, not “allah akbar”.

  2. Nannette says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 9:33 am

    This complete chaos, where our heritage, culture, religion, way of life, education and free speech is being portrayed by the pseudo academia and media as intolerant, racist, colonialist, white supremacist and violent. On the other hand, everything Islamic is acceptable and desired, because it’s considered quaint and ethnic, so we are being forced to be more understanding and appreciative of what Islam and sharia have to offer us.

    It goes without saying that the Democrat and Marxist fascists will, at some point, try to enforce sharia law on the West, just so that they can bring some “order” to our fractured society.

    What these useful, indoctrinated idiots are completely unaware of, is the fact that it’s the goal of Muslim supremacists to create a global caliphate…. and they’re the enablers!

    It’s for the rest of us to fight for our freedom!

  3. Bill says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 9:34 am

    Assuming this report is really true, I have a few observations. I think “Rachel” proved herself to be weak and pathetic. Apologized?! Really? No apologies ever issue from the real terrorists who have murdered so many with the shout of Allah Akbar. She graduated, she moved. She is not subject to the Universities rules, regulations or dictates. She should be suing the University for stalking her and she should be getting a restraining order against the University officials involved.

    I would never hire her as a lawyer to represent me in any matter. “Rachel’s” purported actions inform me that she has no fight in her, no guts, no capacity to stand to an adversary. I say that, but even though she has her law degree, she may not actually be practicing. I cannot imagine someone so easily cowed being capable of standing to the rigors and obligations of that profession. To “Rachel”: you had a chance to stand tall, assert yourself, fight Jesuit bigotry, hatred and intolerance, and instead you just turtled up and crawled away. Shame.

    I would hesitate to trust any lawyer graduating with a University of San Francisco law degree if that University’s actions and her behavior are exemplars of what the law school teaches and the spinelessness of the students they graduate.

    As for the University of San Francisco, they appear to be another Jesuit institution acting in concert with Pope Francis, academic apologists and intellectual enablers of Jihad terror and invasion on a global basis. They may not finance the terrorists, they may not detonate the bombs or pull the triggers, but in every death at the hands of the terrorists, they shoulder some of the responsibility.

    • Lucretius says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 1:43 pm

      Seems like the University did its work well. As Jordan Peterson asserts, the sensitivity training of such places is resilience destroying.

    • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 8:25 pm

      Mega dittoes!

      This ‘caving’ by this woman; esp. an attorney at law? Is pathetic. In doing this, ‘Rachel’ has abdicated her right to be aggrieved by SF’s appalling tyranny.

      But as a 1st Amendment lawyer working on our campuses, I see this every single day. Now it is understandable when the professors tyrannize the students; they are utterly reliant on their professors for their grades, which open the door to their dreams: Law School, Medical School, the professions. And even so every day we receive formal complaints from present students, who-young as they are, still fight back. And we always win, for the 1st Amendment may not be suppressed by entities which take State/Fed taxpayer monies. All these colleges do just that, SF included.

      But ‘Rachel’ is not subject to SF. She is free. Alas! she apparently is unwilling to defend her freedom; thus, she has lost it.

  4. Jaladhi says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 9:35 am

    Yeah right – shouting allahu akabar while murdering non-Muslims is not a negative depiction of Muslims but if an infidel calls allahu akbar then all the hell breaks loose!! What a bunch of hypocrites. Oh I get it now – allahu akbar is strictly Islamic phrase and infidels are not allowed to use it!! Ha, ha,..halal..

    • Jaladhi says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 9:35 am

      Oops it should have been Ha, ha,.. haram!!

  5. miriamrove says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 10:02 am

    “is considered an ‘act of intolerance,……

    What a bunch of PC Dbags. Muslims feelings and hurts supersede free speech. m

  6. mortimer says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 10:04 am

    BRIBERY is the root of the loss of free speech in the West.

    Gulf oil money BRIBERY of Western politicians is causing measures against the freedom of debate.

    Freedom of speech is required when ideas are not the RECEIVED ideas. What is important is whether ideas are TRUE or WELL-FOUNDED in FACT… not whether an idea is ‘popular’.

    The Left believes in its own infallibility. They are not infallible.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 7:33 pm

      Mortimer, the idea that every appeaser of Islam is being bribed by Saudi Arabia is simply not borne out. There are plenty of ordinary citizens who are just immersed in denial over the threat of Islam.

  7. mortimer says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 10:07 am

    There should be no apologizing for the hijab-bomber symbol. The Islamic veil is the uniform of an Islamic supremacist. The veil is a political statement of the suppression of women.

    If there were any real Feminists left, they would also criticize this REPRESSION OF WOMEN and ISLAMIC GENDER APARTHEID which is the next step after veiling.

    • Charli Main says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 12:20 pm

      Agreed. Time to stop apologising to Muslims. If Muslims don’t like it, tough s**t.

      If the TRUTH about Islam hurts or upsets the Muslims, I’m all in favour of shoving that truth down their throats at every opportunity.

      • gravenimage says

        Feb 1, 2017 at 7:38 pm

        This wasn’t even Muslims demanding an apology–just the dhimmi tools at her old college.

  8. mccode says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 10:09 am

    All the university needs now is to station muezzin in the minarets….oops, I mean the towers on campus….

  9. Shmooviyet says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 10:28 am

    “Bend over and take it, Rachel.
    We reserve the right to monitor your future behavior.”
    What was the threat if she didn’t properly prostrate herself?

    • Bill says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 11:07 am

      I wonder about the threat too. That’s why I thought her better response would have been to get an injunction against the University for stalking her and seek a personal restraining order against any officer or employee of the University that had threatened to do anything to her, whether physical or not. Nowadays, I can imagine that you get get a restraining order to stop cyber bullying.

      • c matt says

        Feb 1, 2017 at 12:59 pm

        I can’t imagine that they could revoke her degree for actions AFTER you graduate. If you have completed the requirements and the degree has been conferred, you are done with the institution. Don’t know if it was a law degree (the law school is mentioned – wonder if they offer sharia studies), but if she has a law license, maybe the school could cause trouble with that. But that should be up to the state bar where she is licensed, not the school.

        • Bill says

          Feb 1, 2017 at 3:34 pm

          That is why I have some doubts about the authenticity of the story. It just does not make sense for the reasons you state. While it might have happened in the narrow sense of that word, it also might have been staged cooperatively, as sort of an example of how passionately engaged the University is in combating “Islamophobia” — sort of virtue signalling on steroids.

        • gravenimage says

          Feb 1, 2017 at 7:43 pm

          No, I’m sure it’s true, Bill. She probably just wants to maintain a good relationship with her university as an alumna. And the University of San Francisco is a small, close-knit college, with much closer ties to its alumni than many larger institutions. I’ve been there for quite a few events.

          That being said, of course, was no reason for the to cave. She could have been polite and yet still have stuck to her convictions–and there is no excuse for the university to have stuck its nose into her affairs.

        • Oliver says

          Feb 5, 2017 at 1:00 pm

          I agree- and also- SHE MOVED OUT OF STATE- so the Cal. bar would have no sway. And, her comments should be considered free speech.

          Although, seems like ( she) was doing something that looks like a waste of time.

  10. Mike says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 10:33 am

    I guess we’ll meet her at the re-edukashon kamp.

    Some opinions aren’t allowed. They’re offensive.

    Funny how the Constitution doesn’t have a right to be free from offence…

  11. Westman says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 10:38 am

    This is Communism without the economic controls. How long will it be before there are enough non-producers, sympathizers, and opportunists, created by the Universities, to create a communist revolution?

    Of course, they would give it a different name, but it would be the old story of the means, mostly wealth transfer and societal controls, being justified by vision of a blue-sky “equality for all”. Maybe they could call it the “Zakat Revolution”

    They are already Godless and funding their pet causes from your pockets. Has Mr. Soros considered that he will eventually be their target?

    The irony of the Godless supporting all aspects of a foreign-God-centered ideology, one that is dedicated to their destruction, is astounding to the logical mind. It is like volunteering to be a sacrificial victim in an ancient Aztec ritual. They seem to be concentrating on the momentary euphoric heights without realizing what comes before the descent.

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 7:47 pm

      For what it’s worth, this university is not “godless”–it is a Catholic college–but one infused with stupid “interfaith outreach” to Islam, and an unfounded belief that Islam presents no threat to us. Here is one such example:

      “Fostering Interfaith Understanding
      USF Conference Examines Muslim Studies and Jesuit Universities”

      https://www.usfca.edu/news/fostering-interfaith-understanding

      • c matt says

        Feb 2, 2017 at 3:34 pm

        Well, from what I understand it is a “Jesuit” college, which, for some time now, has not been Catholic even in name. However, I would not want to malign the entire order of Jesuits for the failing of the 99%.

  12. pdxnag says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 10:54 am

    Islamists and their sympathizers, including so-called moderate Muslims and tyrannical government, deserve ridicule — at least 17 times a day, in five sessions.

  13. Troybeam says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 11:02 am

    Islam is the subject in the non subject world of free speech, Islam is allowed to raise protest signs with the words :BEHEAD THOSE THAT SLANDER ISLAM” and yet anyone else is charged with a hate crime. This is what people are missing here, Islam is silencing those that speak against it yet Islam itself is free to speak whatever it wants when it comes to non Muslims.

    This is part of the internal Jihad Islam is imposing on the non Muslim world, creating a segregated victim mentality that Islam is a victim therefore we non Muslims must be silenced and punished for our First Amendment/Freedom of speech while Islam its self is free to express its hate and thoughts without penalty.

    • no_one says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 12:51 pm

      I agree with this. We don’t have freedom of speech anymore. There are many useful idiots who agree that criticizing islam is a hate speech and try to silence critics.

  14. Badger says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 11:47 am

    Shame on you Rachel. You should have told them to plss off.

  15. David says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 11:58 am

    Wear T-shirts that say. Sharia law vs. First amendent! And even pass out small books of the us constitution! And then wait and see how long it will take college students protest & say they don’t want persons to know their rights! And colleges will back the students! All of these snowflacks live in melt down dream world!!! I do wear a T-shirt that says Sharaia law vs. first Amendemt. And other persons tell me that they are offended. I do not care about political correctness. It doesn’t been anything!!!

  16. Bill says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 12:13 pm

    Its San Francisco, thats what they do. (Every day!)

  17. DFD says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 12:19 pm

    Looks like a mosque to me… How does it go? Form follows function – or is it the other way round?

    If that *is* a San Francisco law school, one cannot help but wonder, in abhorrence, what the San Francisco town/city council *is* (or whatever you call the local gov. over there). Probably the same as over here in western Europe… I wouldn’t be surprised if ‘they’ wont get enough signatures for their Californian “independence thing”. And thereafter: “Viva Mexico!”

    Further: “…The law school said Thursday night’s forum would be a chance for people to “share reflections” on how the image affected them. In the email, administrators told students that if they witness an act of intolerance, “please file a report”…. “

    Yup, denunciate, like under the Stasi, KGB and Gestapo. Under those, schoolchildren were asked and encouraged to report on their parents, if they discussed taboo or (the then) politically incorrect matters – so that the state could help them, of course.

    **NOW**, that is the case again in Finland! Schoolchildren are being asked to report if their parents are critical of the refugee policy, of the *Hijrians* themselves or their ‘religion’. Prediction: Soon in other schools in western Europe {insert: Who’s first? France or England? Too risky in Germany, too obvious, fresh memories} with the US following shortly. My bet: England, Theresa. France wont risk it, too risky because of Le Pen… For the time being. After the election? Different matter.

    Here is what needs to be done, and what I doubt will be done: ***SERIOUS PURGES!*** Will Trump have the guts for that? Or the AfD, the FPÖ, Le Pen/FN, Wilders… Should they actually win. After all, purges require measures that are nearly as unpalatable as the disease. ‘Should they actually win’? The death grip of the regimes upon the MSM is practically 100%, or just a touch below that.

    PS: Fellow Europeans: Please stop referring to them as ‘elites’, they are not. They are governing, controlling regimes!

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 7:51 pm

      The Board of Supervisors in San Francisco is pretty dhimmified over all, as you might imagine.

  18. Tommy says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 12:32 pm

    What about ‘Piss Christ’? What about the Virgin Mary in a pile of dung? Or other attacks against Christianity? Those are called free speech?

    • DFD says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 12:36 pm

      To us dumb-arse Kafirs, yes! Just ask a journalist…

    • c matt says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 1:03 pm

      I guess those are so obviously false, they cannot be considered offensive. Now a Mohammed with a bomb in his hand – that hits too close to home.

  19. John C. Barile says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 12:33 pm

    Charged by USF with a thought crime–THINKCRIME in Newspeak.

  20. davej says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 2:28 pm

    I wonder exactly how they leaned on Rachel. The fact that we don’t know just demonstrates more repression of the truth. She probably had to agree not to disclose that as part of the forced apology.

    The fact that it was a law school that extorted her is shameful and ironic.

    “Behead those who threaten the free speech of others!” Or is that too “radical”?

  21. DFD says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 2:56 pm

    More on what you can expect; as reported in “Junge Freiheit” based upon a report in the UK’s “Independent”:

    Students of the London School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) have demanded that white philosophies and philosophers be removed from the curriculum. The focus should be on African and Asian philosophers and philosophies. The “structural and recognizable inheritance of the colonial area must be appropriately addressed.” … “Emphasis should be on the largest part of philosophers from the ‘south’” … “Should it be necessary that white philosophers have to be regarded, then it should be done ‘under a critical aspect’ so that the colonial context is recognizable.” … “A cultural and democratic curriculum should be independent (?) of the origin of the lecturer … in view of the global and national priorities in the 21st century.” Stated by Deborah Gabriel, who added that the criteria of the discipline is too narrow and too eurocentric. Actual article in “Junge Freiheit Archiove”, here, in German: tinyurl.com/hbhawks

    You think that’s it? How about this: Students (Antifa) ‘practising’ to blockade the next G20 meeting in Hamburg in July 2017. Here’s a picture of them: https://assets.jungefreiheit.de/2017/02/Sitzblockade-860×360-1485966011.jpg Lovely kids, students, aren’t they?

    Do they look familiar? Yes, you have them too! Probably not under the name of Antifa, but something like that. Same followers of the School of Frankfurt, Kalergians and Hootonians.

    Incidentally, I believe it was Churchill who said that in the future the fascists will call themselves antifascists – that is the literal translation of the abbreviation of antifa, AntiFaschisten. Trust me, you are as infested as we are.

    One of their latest: A traditional student group calls itself “Balmung”, the name of Siegfried’s sword in the Nibelungs. Sure enough, they are immediately identified as NeoNazis – as are *ALL* members of traditional, normal student groups, as well as everybody else who doesn’t belong to the left. Those are frequently lurked on, and attacked by antifa. Often enough, the victims end up in hospital. Culprits caught? None! Although there frequently were accurate descriptions, and even cell phone pictures, Merkel’s Germany… So, back to Balmung, their members were ‘observed’ by antifas, and they found that one of the members of Balmung visits frequently a restaurant/bar which had also been visited by a young Adolf H. The restaurant/bar doesn’t advertise that fact, and why should they? Antifa’s actions? They started a campaign declaring them, Balmung, to have “CONTACT GHUILT” with Adolf, no kidding. Finding out about the ‘history’ of that restaurant goes to show how thorough and well organized the antifa is. I wonder how many of the restaurant’s staff members know about this, probably none.

    So, Americans, near future, think before you pick-nick! There could have been an Injun massacre at your pick-nick spot. And if you use white bedlinen, be careful if you wash them in a public laundry, particularly so if you are Christian and you wear a cross around your neck.

    Trump will…? Only if he’s willing to perform **massive** purges, and only then. Though, I could be wrong – hopefully!

    • gravenimage says

      Feb 1, 2017 at 7:53 pm

      Yes–I’ve seen lots of this sort of stupidity, DFD.

  22. gravenimage says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 7:27 pm

    University of San Francisco in uproar, persecutes former student for Snapchat “Allah akbar” emoji
    ………………………..

    *Disgusting*. And please note: the University of San Francisco is a Catholic university, and is generally more conservative than is the better known San Francisco State University.

  23. Arthur says

    Feb 1, 2017 at 9:19 pm

    I suspect Rachel’s emoji must have shown up on some university-related facebook page. Evidently Rachel feels a need to keep in touch with the University or classmates, and that is probably a factor in her quick capitulation. I suspect the University’s leverage was more of the soft, University: “We will have to drop you from our facebook feed if you continue to use that emoji.” Rachel: “Oh, I’m sorry, I’ll not use that.”

    Rachel should understand how to play the game. Instead, say Rachel: “Oh, well if I am blocked from participating in the University’s facebook feed then I suppose I would not be able to continue my donations to the Alumni Association. I’ll let all my friends know that I’ve been blocked and that they may also wish to discontinue their donations to the Alumni Association to show their solidarity with me. We’re really good friends, you see. I guess a time comes when you have to let go of school and grow up.”

  24. Merklexit says

    Feb 2, 2017 at 3:41 am

    Don’t judge her too harshly: if she did not apoogize quickly and correctly the ‘youths’ she offended would kill her to prove their tolerance.

    Oh just joking!

  25. JDow says

    Feb 2, 2017 at 3:57 am

    I think the watchword for the school is “You lose!” I bet she does not make any contributions to the school and leaves nothing to them in her will now that she sees it’s new colors.

    {^_^}

  26. bostongal912 says

    Feb 2, 2017 at 5:35 am

    These colleges and their super sensitive students and professors really need to lighten up! Where’s the outrage when students are harassing and making their life a nightmare for the Jewish students? The pro- Palestine students are relentless and they get away with it. It’s such a double standard! Makes me so angry!

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Infidel on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • iconoclast123 on India: Police make first arrest for ‘love jihad’ under new law
  • gravenimage on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Brando on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.