Hate crime is a booming business today: both Leftists and their Muslim allies are making as much of use of hate crimes as they possibly can in order to discredit foes of jihad terror and Sharia oppression as racist, redneck, violent yahoos who deserve no place in the public square. There’s just one problem: actual hate crimes against Leftists and Muslims are so thin on the ground that they have to be invented in order to keep this failing narrative alive. And so here we go again.
The London Muslim Mosque website says: “This afternoon, a young man entered the London Muslim Mosque during a prayer service, looking for food and assistance. After being provided with some food, he persisted in his asks. During a verbal confrontation, the situation escalated and he made threats to those present. Staff and volunteers at the Mosque have been trained to call London Police in any circumstance where there is any suggestion of a security threat, and this protocol was followed.”
They do not mention, of course, that the perpetrator was Muslim.
“Police charge man who allegedly threatened a mosque in London, Ont.,” The Canadian Press, March 20, 2017:
LONDON, Ont. — Police have charged a 24-year-old man after he allegedly threatened to shoot people inside a mosque in London, Ont.
London police say they responded to a serious threat at about 1:40 p.m. Sunday at the London Muslim Mosque and directed those inside to lock the doors.
They say they immediately arrested a man without incident.
Police say they didn’t find a gun and don’t believe the threat was racially motivated.
Omid Ghaffouri, of London, has been charged with uttering threats, disturbing religious worship and failing to leave a premises when directed.
Hindu American says
Noooo!!! I am shocked!! Shocked, I say, shocked!! This cannot be. What is the world coming to? Muslims lying? I hope the police took their shoes off before they entered the mosque.
Mike says
….. And also that they didn’t came in with dogs and female policemen ( in order , according to Islam sacred books ).
Robert McKenna says
OH ! Alley help us if one of those female policemen was wearing a Tampax ! HEH !
Jeanette says
They probably don’t have any policewomen who have been properly butchered, according to Muslim tradition.
Robert McKenna says
Surely this was a “Hate Crime” ! The food he was given must have caused him to develop gas.
Incidentally, does anyone remember where the “Hate Crime” designation came from ? Do you remember whose demanding, whining and simpering lobby caused it to be in existence ?
Perfect example of unintended consequences. From something with a good purpose to a “poor victim me”
vehicle for lying, demonstrating, filthy muslims.
Terry says
I remember seeing references to “hate crimes” at least 20 or more years ago–long before there was an Muslim infiltration ( except possibly Germany, were they were taken in by the thousands to do manual labor that was beneath the dignity of Germans to do.).
I THINK it was started to battle crimes against racial and religious minorities- .
Although, to me, what difference should it make if one was mugged because of his or her religion, color or the type of car one drove.
The penalty should be the same
A Harris USA says
Hindu, love the sarcasim !! I am sure the lying media in Canada will not put this as a headline either. MUSLIM was the one who made these threats, just the same old hiding the facts.. AMEN on the filthy Muslims, same old filthy tricks!!
john spielman says
figures!
Dawn says
Are you sure he is Muslim ? He must be white Christian male isn’t that always what they say, her sarcasm . Its a wonder the media don’t cover it up and say
Islamaphobia
Jeanette says
Some media person will – just wait.
salim says
Despite over 30,000 terrorist attacks since 9/11, many of them in the West, there have been no (or very few) backlashes. This unprecedented level of tolerance is both a fact and a credit to the West. However, governments should have taken some serious measures, as opposed to politically correct ones, to stop more terrorist attacks.. I am afraid its the lack of such measures that is worrying as it can only lead to public frustration that may force some idiots to act stupidly.
Stan Lee says
If the shooter is gunned down in self-defense. It is obvious that every detail cannot be left to government and the sooner people don’t expect a blanket of government coverage, the better the lives of the law-abiding and peaceful will be.
Jeanette says
In some parts of America, it would behoove the Muslims to depart, as the “idiots” are well armed, and many are crack shots.
HIPS says
“Police…don’t believe the threat was racially motivated”.
How is threatening to shoot dozens of people not a radical concept?
Terry says
I think the IMPORTANT WORD IS ” RACIALLY”. NOT RELIGIOSITY.
HE DID NOT THREATEN TO SHOOT (ONLY) WHITES OR (ONLY) BLACKS-JUST PEOPLE- SO, NOT RACIALLY MOTIVATED- AS HE DID NOT SPECIFY A RACE (OTHER THAN HUMAN) .
As for religiosity-it would stand to reason that the only people there would be Muslims.
In myy view, the POLICE WERE RIGHT-NOT RACIALLY MOTIVATED. MUSLIMS COME INA LL COLORS AND RACES.
gravenimage says
Right, Terry.
mortimer says
Is Omid Ghaffouri angry because the mosque denies certain ESSENTIAL ISLAMIC DOCTRINES, for sectarian differences or is he a ‘takfiri’ who has declared the mosque members to be kafirs and hypocrites who should be executed.
Stan Lee says
The Muslim bloke was not fooling about “jihad” in earnest. Before he really goes “public,” he just thought his brethren wouldn’t mind if he took a bit of shooting practice on them. Since they all aspire to martyrdom at one time or another, he figured “what’s the difference” if it happens here or any where else?”
Dov Berrol says
I am still waiting for the real truth to come out about who really incited that Quebec student to shoot Muslims in that mosque this winter. Strange that we don’t hear anything about the investigation or the court hearing or the trial. The silence is deafening. The Canadian media seem to be quite satisfied that it was an islamaphobic attack by a racist non-Muslim. But I have my doubts that he did this on his own. Do JW readers have any updates about this investigation?
BLC says
I have been waiting to hear what really happened there, too. I think if it were really Islamophobia that caused it, the MSM would not let the story die. We would have been hearing about it from the time it happened until now with no end in sight. Likely the truth does not fit the MSM Islamophobia narrative.
Dov Berrol says
Indeed. I hope that the JihadWatch community keeps their eyes and ears open for any updates on this possible “manufactured” hate crime in Quebec City.
Susan Longley says
I believe the court hearing was remanded until mid April when the case against the alleged attacker will be made public.
Richard says
We’ve had no updates other than being told that the presiding judge has placed a publication ban on all proceedings for the duration of the trial. Interestingly he has also permitted the mosque to have a team of lawyers present during the court proceedings as observers, ostensibly to ensure that the “interests of the mosque are protected”. That’s a pretty accurate quote to the best of my recollection.
gravenimage says
Yes–he was reported screaming “Allahu Akbar!”–but now that seems largely forgotten, and it touted as an example of “Islamophobia”. I would not be surprised if it is just more Muslim-on-Muslim savagery.
abad says
Time to close all mosques in the western world – they are breeding grounds for terrorism.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
… both Leftists and their Muslim allies are making as much of use of hate crimes as they possibly can…
In a free society, there can be no such thing as a hate crime. There can only be crimes. Why a person kills or assaults or threatens is irrelevant, the very fact of the murder, attack or threat is the crime. The widespread acceptance of hate crimes as established law is dangerous because it puts the government in the position of judging a person’s motives as part of the crime. Motive can only be used to prove a crime, but must never be used to define it. Moslems and globo-socialists understand this, which is why they trade in fake hate crime allegations. Hate crime is a super-crime, the payoff is big.
In fact, if there’s gonna be hate crime, then Islam and globo-socialism must be made entirely illegal given that both are world takeover belief ideologies.
FYI says
{sarc on/}
Well thank goodness for that because I was afraid it was one of those terrible Christian folk praising Jesus and spreading the Love of God……I mean you couldn’t have that sort of behavior in a mosque:it would enrage allah and his followers…any talk of Love.Or hymns,or singing…..allah hates that.
“Oh you can’t sing in here son.This is a mosque.allah will be furious.”
allah hates Love.
allah’s koran is evidence of that.
allah is not terribly nice.
As ayatollah khomeni said of his allah,”There are no jokes in islam.There is no humor in islam.there is no fun in islam” ..he said before apparently slipping on a banana peel,landing on top of a chicken coup killing three chickens,
knocking over a lantern,accidently starting a fire which resulted in the burning down of a mosque.*
God on the other hand,……IS Love.
There is also plenty of humor in God.
After all,He allowed the great ayatollah to delude himself into thinking that allah{a humorless,miserable caricature of God} .. was the same as God.That’s pretty funny.
*Ok,Ok that didn’t happen..
Ed says
I heard this the other day on a local London radio station.
The indicated the age of the guy and what had taken place but did not mention his name.
My first thought was “that’s strange, the media always tell us it Joe Blow intolerant Canadian threatening peaceful Muslims Any opportunity to push that agenda especially when the man is 24 years of age, there is no need to hide his name.”
Then I knew he was obviously Muslim, and that is why they did not mention his name. It goes against the Liberal media agenda.
And now my suspicions are confirmed.
Pathetic “news” media.
gravenimage says
Yup.
Florida Jim says
How much proof do we need that muslims are dishonest and want to take over the world state by state and then behead everyone who doesn’t believe Islam. Unless we start deporting Muslims there will be too many to vote against freedom, as they want.
tony46 says
In another news:
CP24 –Toronto news channel– said yesterday:
”Residents of Emerson, Manitoba becoming annoyed with some of the refuge-seekers attitudes”
Is that a beginning??
Bruce says
Yes, the beginning of the end for us all…. sigh
Jeanette says
Amazing how quickly this was designated as terrorism. The elites and the elite MSM are a lot slower to do that when their valuable derrieres aren’t endangered by terrorists.
Jeanette says
Sorry, I’ve got the sound of the ambulances on the TV, with the reporting on the attacks in London, and momentarily shorted circuited back to the comment section on that event, where I was a few minutes ago.
Thus the comment that doesn’t apply to this situation.
gravenimage says
Understandable, Jeanette.
And I agree–the only good thing is that this was acknowledged to be Jihad in London very early on.
Angemon says
He made threats instead of shooting – must be a “moderate”…
London Jim says
>Breaking news< UK London, Parliament attack, 4 dead inc attacker.
UNCLE VLADDI says
IT’S ALL SLANDER.
And who commits slander? ONLY criminal extortionists trying to enslave their victims!
Even the “Left-wing/Right-wing” gang-wars scenario is utter nonsense, and, you guessed it: slander!
The “right wing” doesn’t exist – it’s just a false gang accusation made up about individualists by leftopathic extortionists to justify their own perpetual extortions and slavery attempts as “defensive!”?
Socialism is slavery.
Fascism is slavery.
Islam is slavery.
Conservatives are proud individualists.
The whole “right-wing radicalization” slander attempt is typical of the criminal islamo-communazis’ immoral relativism – their #1 alibi to excuse their crimes is the Argumentum Tu Quoque “Two wrongs make a right!” fallacy: “We extortionist gangster criminals (i.e: “leftists/fascists/muslims”) aren’t evil because you all do it, too! Whee!”
So, in order to “prove” this fallacy, they need to cherry-pick (or mock up fake) “evidence” that others “do it too!”
These libertine “liberals” (criminal gangster extortionists) love to blame their victims!
These generalizations are slanders against large groups, (like the alleged “privileged white males” class-ification) the use by which they hope they won’t be sued for libel, because the groups are so large as to not have leaders.
The reason they don’t provide any specific examples in comparison is that they can’t.
“Socialism” is criminal gangster extortion leading to slavery. That’s really all it is.
And despite it’s fluffy label, there’s nothing “sociable” about any of that at all, ever!
“Right wingers” are only normal people who don’t like being extorted by “socialist” gangsters.
Gangster victimologists always feel endangered by proud individualists.
Honestly, people – “right wingers” don’t actually exist. Hitler was a National SOCIALIST.
And even “Fascism” was invented by Benito Mussolini, the devoted Italian SOCIALIST.
So, what’s a “right winger?” It’s any normal person who wakes up enough to take a bit of time off from minding their own businesses to temporarily band together to vote to not be extorted any more by group-might-makes-rights-worshiping “socialist” gangster criminals.
gravenimage says
Canada: Man charged with threatening to shoot people inside mosque is…Muslim
……………..
This should surprise no one. I still wonder about the Mosque shooting in Canada, where the shooter was reported to be screaming “Allahu Akbar!”–I have not heard anything further about that aspect of the case.
B. Murphy says
You have to be stupid to expect anything but biased propaganda from the majority of the media today , with the CBC leading the way. No wonder ,as they were promised even more taxpayer money by our imbecilic P.M. during the election campaign . I don’t understand how that is acceptable as it was a blatant move to curry favor and buy votes. Certainly not ethical but the trained seals of the Liberal party don’t trouble themselves with such concepts , considering their hefty salaries and pensions . Remember P.E.T. was riding around Montreal on a motorcycle sporting a swastika while Canadian’s were doing their best to combat real racists. How far did this Muslim ass kisser fall from his family tree ? How convenient that the Quebec attack occurred just before the Islamophobia motion started getting attention from the media , but not soon enough to stir up a hornets nest of opposition sufficient to stop it.This country needs to wake up and confront and reject sunny days before he does even more damage than his father.