Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is now considering unspecified actions to hamper free speech and silence hateful criticism…. According to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) the Liberal government is prepared to “tackle any form of hate or threat” directed at Members of Parliament (MP).
Every member of Parliament — and indeed, every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence,” PMO spokesman Cameron Ahmad wrote.
Every citizen in Canada is also entitled to live in a country where he or she feels safe from jihad terror and the Islamic agenda of civilizational jihad and conquest outlined in the Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Plan for North America.
The controversy in Canada over hatred and threats allegedly directed to Members of Parliament (MP) is part of the larger controversy over Toronto-area MP Iqra Khalid’s efforts to force through “anti-Islamophobia” motion M-103. The Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs, among others, presented her with the option of promoting instead a motion against “anti-Muslim bigotry,” rejecting the term “Islamophobia” as “misleading, ambiguous, and politically charged,” but Khalid remains resolute in pushing her anti- “Islamophobia” agenda, which is widely seen as a first step to curb the freedom of speech. Her motion enables the current incursion of anti-democratic values into Canada, as we see from the example of Europe: the Muslim migrant chaos and rampant crime, including the rape of infidel women, has been arrogantly waved away by leftist politicians and leaders who insist that it is “racist” to point out the fact that Islamic texts contain justifications for such crimes. These rapes are not isolated cases, but are committed so frequently in part because of the justification for them within Islamic teaching:
(Quran 24:31) And tell the believing women to reduce of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.
If a woman does not cover up, she is fair game to be assaulted:
(Quran 33:59) O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.
Any Muslim who supports democracy and the rights of women is quick to maintain that the literal understanding of such texts are antiquated, barbaric and have no place in modern times.
Omar Alghabra, another Toronto-area MP, has resorted to arrogantly insulting Canadians for daring to question the obvious threat of introducing Sharia values into Canada. Back in 2002, Alghabra stated that he did not believe that Hamas (a Muslim Brotherhood proxy group) or Islamic Jihad were terrorist groups, prompting any reasonable Canadian to question Alghabra’s personal commitment to Canadian and Western values. Alghabra has also “openly stated that he favors Sharia Law for Ontario and that he was disappointed when he did not happen in Ontario after the 2003/2006 debate in Ontario.”
The “Islamophobia” agenda is being pushed at the highest levels. The former Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Ekmeleddin Mehmet İhsanoğlu, has stated: “The OIC has become an indispensable player at the international level, in many domains, notably in the realms of dialogue among civilizations, defending the image of Islam, and combating the phenomenon of Islamophobia.”
The OIC is an international organization with the objective of establishing global Sharia. Its activists exploit the generosity of Westerners as they aggressively beat down critics through intimidation and the imputation of guilt. In the case of M-103, Iqra Khalid uses the victimology narrative to promote her “Islamophobia” agenda…..
Iqra Khalid, the Toronto-area Muslim MP who introduced the divisive “Islamophobia” motion without defining “Islamophobia,” told reporters last month that she received a lot of angry emails over her potential legislation. Someone even called her an “idiot” and “scumbag,” she reported.
Another writer apparently promised not to shoot Khalid but said he was “going to be there to film you on the ground crying.”
While Khalid advances her schemes through guilt, she was in cahoots with the virulently anti-Semitic Muslim Student Association; she was its president while at York University as a student, and she has also allied herself with Palestine House in Mississauga, which was defunded by the Conservative Harper government for supporting terrorism.
“Trudeau Gov’t Looking At Ways To Protect Members Of Parliament From Hateful Criticism”, by David Krayden, Daily Caller, March 5, 2017:
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is now considering unspecified actions to hamper free speech and silence hateful criticism, says the Liberal-friendly Toronto Star. According to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) the Liberal government is prepared to “tackle any form of hate or threat” directed at Members of Parliament (MP).
The hatred in question is the criticism being leveled at many Liberal MPs for supporting Motion M-103, which targets what the motion’s author sees as an epidemic of “Islamophobia” in Canada. The motion has been debated in Parliament and is expected to easily pass with the Liberal government’s majority in the House of Commons.
The PMO cagily refused “to confirm or deny” the anticipated actions now being considered by the Trudeau cabinet but did acknowledge that the government is working on a plan to make an MP’s workplace safe from angry constituents.
“Every member of Parliament — and indeed, every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence,” PMO spokesman Cameron Ahmad wrote.
The concept of “hate speech” remains a controversial one in criminal law because it is subject to broad interpretation.
“As always, we remain eager to work alongside MPs, including opposition members, to tackle any form of hate or threat to ensure all MPs and their staff are guaranteed a safe working environment,” Ahmad said.
Iqra Khalid, the Toronto-area Muslim MP who introduced the divisive “Islamophobia” motion without defining “Islamophobia,” told reporters last month that she received a lot of angry emails over her potential legislation. Someone even called her an “idiot” and “scumbag,” she reported.
Another writer apparently promised not to shoot Khalid but said he was “going to be there to film you on the ground crying.”
Omar Alghabra, another Toronto-area MP who expressed enthusiasm for Khalid’s motion, suggested the government needs to stop hateful critics for the sake of staffers who have to read the noxious material.
“I’m the political candidate and I’m the representative, and I expect people will be saying sometimes tough things towards me, but I want to make sure that my staff who has maybe never seen this before . . . are protected, and know that everything is OK,” Alghabra said.
Alghabra dismissed criticism of Khalid’s motion as the work of people influenced by “misinformation and ignorance”….
Tommy says
Idiot…scumbag If the suit fits, wear it!
jim hane says
All the atrocities done by ISIS were first done by Prophet Muhammad. All the sexual perversions prohibited in the Holy Bible were also done by Muhammad. All these are clearly and explicitly stated in the canonical texts of Islam – the Quran, the hadiths and the Sirasullah.
“Prophet” Muhammad was the exact opposite of Jesus and Buddha. To know whether a religion is inherently violent or not, we have to look closely at the character, conduct and teachings of it’s Founder. This means that we have to actually study the religion’s canonical texts!
He had about 11 wives, many sex slaves and concubines. He traded in slaves. He led armed gangs to rob, loot and rape non-Muslim villages and caravans. He called these “Jihad” holy war. We call these robbery and terrorism.
At the age of 50, Prophet Muhammad married a six year old girl named Aisha. This is stated in sahih Bukhari a very strong hadith. He raped her when she was nine years old. He often used to fondle, molest and rub her on his thigh (thigh her) until he ejaculated. Then, he asked her to wash the semen off his clothes. At a later age, he told everyone that he wanted to marry a three year old toddler. He was lusting after a three year old toddler.
He used to kiss the penis’ of small boys in his old age. He also used to kiss small boys and girls on their lips. He brought the corpse of one of his wives into his tent and started raping it! He also had sex with a goat.
He finally died with his penis erect! He was suffering from a medical condition called priapism – a permanent erection of the penis due to poor blood flow. He would rape anything he could get his hands on.
Prophet Muhammad was a filthy old bastard, a terrorist and a barbarian.
Bukhari Hadith 7.62.88. Prophet Muhammad at the age of 50 married Aisha when she was six year’s old and consummated his marriage with her when she was aged nine year’s old.
Prophet Muhammad married Aisha when she was six, and had sexual intercourse with her while she still remained pre-pubescent at the age of nine lunar years. This fact has been recorded many times in Sahih ahadith.
‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: “Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house at the age of nine.” (Sahih Muslim 3309) This is confirmed in many other hadith as well.
Narrated ‘Aisha:
I used to wash the traces of Janaba (semen) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible). (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229)
SEX WITH SMALL BOYS – a cock sucker
These hadiths are from the library of the Alhazar University – Sunni Islam’s most prestigious university. Islamic scholars say that they are authentic but weak hadiths. Weak hadiths become strong hadiths when they are repeated! This is the rule in Islamis jurisprudence.
“And there shall wait on them [the Muslim men] young boys of their own, as fair as virgin pearls.”
Hadith Number 16245, Volume Title: “The Sayings of the Syrians,” Chapter Title: “Hadith of Mu’awiya Ibn Abu Sufyan”:
“I saw the prophet – pbuh – sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the
prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire)
He (the Prophet) lift up his (al Hassan’s) shirt and kissed his (little) penis..”
روى أنه صلى الله عليه و سلم قبل زبيبة الحسن أو الحسين
He (the prophet) kissed the (little) penis of al Hassan or al Husein
رأيت النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته
He (the prophet) put Husein’s legs apart and kissed his (little) penis
Another Hadith. Majma al-Zawa’id, Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, 299/9 مجمع الزوائد لعلي بن أبى بكر الهيثمي
رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته
رواه الطبراني و إسناده حسن
translated into English: “I saw the Messenger of Allah pbuh putting Husein’s legs apart and kissing his (little) penis.”
Related by Al-Tabarani and it’s authentication is fully validated by Islamic scholars.
Hussein and Hassan is not the same name, so clearly this is of two accounts and he kissed more than one penis.
Muhammad would also invite young boys to see him wash his private parts:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Whenever Allah’s Apostle went to answer the call of nature, I along with another boy used to accompany him with a tumbler full of water. (Hisham commented, “So that he might wash his private parts with it.”) (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Number 152; see also Numbers 153-154).
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8331/universities-indoctrination
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2016/02/16/child-marriage-video-reveals-shocking-reality-for-37000-girls-a-day_n_9241404.html
http://data.unicef.org/child-protection/child-marriage.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWNNFXWHmDU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6U2nrRJ4HU
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/12/new-fbi-hate-crime-stats-show-yet-again-that-claims-about-islamophobia-are-false
The evil self-proclaimed prophet, Muhammad, LIVED and DIED with the medical condition known today as PRIAPISM.
Simply put, because his penis was erect all the time, it caused him pain, and in order to remove the pain, he had to copulate, and copulate he did, with anyone and with anything, mostly animals.
Proof of his priapism is the scene on his death bed.
“Muhammad’s Death Erection
Abu al-Fida (1273 – 1331 AD) was a Muslim geographer and historian. He relates that Prophet Muhammad suffered from a death erection. Ali ibn Abi Ṭalib, the fourth Rightly-guided Caliph of Islam (and also Muhammad’s son-in-law and cousin) washed his body after his death, and had exclaimed, “O prophet, thy penis is erect unto the sky!”
Do we know of any other prophet or important man, who started a following, who penis was still living when the rest of him died? He was a sexual pervert with a voracious sexual appetite!
carol says
@jim hane…
You’ve just done the impossible – uncovered an even seamier side of Mohammed and the ROP! Someone else did the same recently however – Canadian ex-Muslim Sandra Solomon. In an amazing and lengthy interview with Kevin Johnston of Freedom Report she shows just how surprisingly knowledgeable and fluent she is. Kevin BTW is the one who has a grudge against Iqra Khalid and wants to “film her as she lies crying on the ground”. He mentions her with undiminished malice in the video and his plans remain firm.
The video has about six interview sections each with varying focus. It provides a lot of insight and nuance (even to experts I’m sure). When an insider speaks out so well and so honestly it’s fascinating – I’d love to see her collaborate on a book with an official scholar like Robert Spencer. It’s over an hour long but each section is well worth the time:
Ex-Muslim Woman Told The Truth About Islam And What She’s Telling Will Shock You https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7ojKL8A7qQ
mortimer says
http://vesselnews.io/safe-space-government-trudeau-looking-ways-protect-members-parliament-hateful-criticism/
http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/05/trudeau-govt-looking-at-ways-to-protect-members-of-parliament-from-hateful-criticism/
Ned Kelly says
Rape is so common in Muslim countries, the local words for it are “Lie down”. (Grandfathers, father in laws, brother in laws etc,…they all live communal… all help themselves to any woman they can, knowing they cant say anything, or will be killed. )Read the book “NOT WITHOUT MY DAUGHTER”, written by an American wife who couldnt leave Iran without her child, so had to sneak out of iran with help from sympathysers, (for a lot of money of course)
Terry says
I read that book, years ago- like perhaps 10 or more; and one of my nephews told me it was a movie (possibly a made for t.v. movie).
However, I doubt that today ANY major network (ABC- AKA ALL BULL CRAP; NBC- NOTHING BUT CRAP; CBS- CONTINUAL BULL SHIT: CNN- Many names already posted for that one.) would show this today. Called censorship and don’t offend the lefties.
Paul Nielsen says
Islamophobia is the most nonsensical term of the last 100 years.
During the time of the Soviet Union, people in Western Europe and the US were very careful to not allow Communism to spread further into the Western world. Nobody was nonsensical enough to argue that the Western Europeans were simply “racist” and “Communistophobic”.
Communism was a political doctrine. Islam is also a political doctrine. This can also be seen in the fact that the majority of Muslims (in Western European countries) admit to prefer religious laws over secular laws. Such as preference would make no sense if Islam wouldn’t be a political ideology. This is actually really simple and straightforward stuff.
This is also why London’s mayor Sadiq Khan has a double loyalty. He is divided between his loyalty to Great Britain and his loyalty to the Islamic doctrine. This video explains this: https://youtu.be/kjI4zlYwPCY
Islam is a political doctrine and Muslims are the members of this political doctrine. One can have a phobia for spiders, birds or water, but not for a political doctrine.
Paul
gravenimage says
Good post–except I don’t think Sadiq Khan has any loyalty to Great Britain–just to spreading the foul creed of Islam.
Alexis says
How convenient exclusive to Muslim only .We have laws in place . This is yet another political rallying cry for the Liberals . They need the votes . We have hate laws , aggressive laws and stalking laws , you name it Canada has it . There is no such word as Islamaphobia it is a made up term by liberals a catch phrase . Shame on our government for excluding all the people of Canada except Muslims .
Irene Brekelmans says
I read all those Arabic names in governments and as MP, no wonder, you people of Canada will see how
“dom”, I did not want to say stupid, but that is what I ment, you are to give all those moslem people citizenships and jobs in you government and cities, with 100 of mosques built, I can only say: good luck,
because things will change rapidly and you will be sorry.
What goes around, comes around, This world is about to come to a total change, it will be the biggest event ever, and it has to do with a higher consciousness of people and peace on earth. You will be called upon your actions, everybody will as everything is known, every action, every thought even. No escapes
there. And that is a fantastic thing.
May your God help you (and us). But you are so dense, you can’t even see what is right or wrong.
john spielman says
the good news is that on CBC this am, in an article of M103, the liberal govt view point is being trounced 4/1 with opposition against it!
Em says
So tired of Trudeau’s vapid fat face and breathy pronouncements.
Dan says
“Every member of Parliament — and indeed, every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence,” PMO spokesman Cameron Ahmad wrote.
Then I have me a good case.
During my three year sail from Australia back to the U.S. we were attacked by Muslim pirates at the bottom of the Maldives, attacked by Muslim pirates in the Arabian Sea, (There saved by the U.S. Navy) ran dark for the couple days getting through the entrance area to the Red Sea, all the while listening to accented voices screaming on the radio, either, “We know where you are and are coming to cut your throats. Allah achbar.” or their faking distress calls with people screaming “Mayday, Mayday, Mayday! Please! They’re killing us! They’re killing us!”
In fact the only Muslim country we were near, where we didn’t face some kind of situation like that, was Turkey, (I bet because Israel tends to hang around that neck of the woods.) but even there, we had to deal with the woman in our crew being treated like an idiot trash slave, and taqiyya.
I swore I’d never go back to a Muslim country.
And that I’d make sure everybody here knew exactly what Muslim countries were like.
And all this happened back between ’99 and ’01.
Last I heard, things haven’t improved.
Dan says
The point about my rant, is that under the present circumstances, I am feeling less and less safe in my own country, because I KNOW how Joe Average Mohamed behaves in theirs.
Michael Ray says
The truth has a particular bite to it. Thanks Dan
Dan says
People who just visit these countries for a week or two on a guided tour have NO CLUE as to what the culture is really like.
All they see are the best performances by salesmen, and all good salesmen know how to size up the customer.
And notice I said sales MAN cause the women aren’t even allowed out 90% of the time, let alone the freedom to run a business that entails them talking to male strangers.
Kay says
I hope you’re telling lots of people about your experiences and I hope they repeat your stories to many more.
Dan says
Have been.
But l faces pretty much the same things Robert Spencer and Pam Geller have.
Except for being banned from other countries.
Robert says
I travelled through Yugoslavia with a few friends a few months before the war erupted there, back in the 90s. The women in our group were treated like meat by the Muslims.
One woman — a blonde — was groped, had her hair pulled, and accosted sexually — she only told us about it afterwards, she was so ashamed. The Muslim men were worse than animals — animals don’t act that way.
Only men who live in societies where male sexual desire isn’t properly managed and women are considered property would act the way those men acted. They were despots who could do whatever they pleased to foreign women.
Cretius says
A backlash against a direct attack on free speech in order to curtail the discussion of ideas was to be expected. Islam is not a race. Islam is a collection of ideas, a belief system. People have rights while Ideas have no rights. Examining Islam and dissecting it’s history and philosophy is no different than what has been done to all belief systems, religious and political. Shame on the Liberal party for promoting an attack on free speech. The Criminal Code already has sufficient regulations to protect ALL Canadians.
It should be remembered that Islam does not include free speech or democracy as values. In fact Islam condemns freedom and democracy. No wonder there is anger in the land.
M-103’s sole purpose is to shut down free speech as it pertains to the ideas that form the teachings and history of Islam. M-103 and the Muslim ‘Islamophobia/racist’ propaganda campaign are proof positive that Islam fears to be exposed for what it is, a supremacist, intolerant, misogynistic belief system hallmarked by barbaric Sharia Law with it’s campaign to destroy western freedom and democracy – both an enemy of Islam. Islam seeks a special status not accorded other belief systems and philosophies. Shame on the the Liberal Party Of Canada and their lackeys for being the Muslim shills in this scenario.
Em says
Very well said–thank you and Hear Hear!
Robert says
Yep.
Shmooviyet says
Wow– if all pols/governments could just “silence criticism” of themselves, or this n that favored voter bloc, imagine how long their careers could last!
Oh wait– been done.
Is Tru-duh going to start his own gulag system?
Mark Swan says
Good One Shmooviyet
somehistory says
Those moslims who began the whole thing to have honest discussion of what an evil thing islam is, said they have only just begun. There was an article in Gatestone about it. They are intent on making laws to criminalize anything they don’t want to hear.
Canada is heading for a moslim police state and the idiots are grinning all the way to their destruction. They won’t be safe from the consequences of their actions any more than the average citizen who can’t stop the madness will be safe.
gravenimage says
Canada: Trudeau examining ways to silence “hateful criticism” over “anti-Islamophobia” motion M-103
………………….
So–not only are you not supposed to criticize Islamic savagery in Canada anymore, you are not allowed to criticize the motion criminalizing it, either. Sounds like the “blasphemy laws” in Dar-al-Islam.
Terry says
…. According to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) the Liberal government is prepared to “tackle any form of hate or threat” directed at Members of Parliament (MP).
I am not an attorney, but even I know that there is a MAJOR difference between THREAT AND HATE.
Hate is (usually) not physical. A threat can be physical.
i dislike the thought of “hate crimes’-for example- does it matter if I am (I hope not) mugged because I am a white,jewish male and the mugger hates me for one or more of those -or, if I am mugged because I am handy and he needs money? Either way-I am mugged. Why should (assuming the perp is caught) be punished more severely if the victim was someone from a class (or classes) that he hates, rather than a random victim.
And, would the PM be considered a MP?
And, if Hate is outlawed- does that apply to a child who hates asparagus?
And, why can’t one hate politicians?
Angemon says
Huh, what? Criticism can never be hateful. It’s either valid/legitimate or not. Calling criticism you don’t like “hateful” is evading/deflecting scrutiny by ascribing someone a motivation, which is something that you can never prove. If I say “islam is a terrible religion because it commands its adherents to hate people because of their religion, as seen in such and such quranic verses and commentaries from islamic scholars”, accusing me of being “hateful” doesn’t address my points, it simply tries to sweep them under the rug of my alleged motivation. Do the quranic verses and commentaries I point out say what I claim they do? If so, is pointing to facts being “hateful”?
mortimer says
PM Selfie Zoolander said he admired ‘basic dictatorship’ and praised the butcher of Cuba, Castro.
This naïve trust fund rich kid thinks he can stop free speech in a country of hockey players! He underestimates hockey players if he thinks Canadians will not fight for their free speech.
richard says
Excellent!
dwight hogg says
Omar Alghebra brought in a hate preacher and when caught tried to weasel out of it by saying he wasn’t aware of this Imam’s hateful views. Sure
Guest says
” every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence”, super, Trudeau.
Then please ensure that misogynist, homophobic, antisemitic and anti-unbeliever parts of the koran become illegal to publish and preach. Because they ARE hate speech and the threat of violence.
Matthieu Baudin says
Canada – another country closing in on itself under the weight of its PC burden – Swedish style.
mortimer says
This is the HOLY OFFICE OF THE ISLAMIC INQUISITION!
This is tyranny and JUSTIN IS THE TYRANT.
mortimer says
This TYRANNICAL and DIVISIVE PM MUST BE FORCED TO RESIGN.
mortimer says
Things that all Canadians dislike about Islam: 1 No Golden Rule 2 No free speech 3 No democracy 4 Jihad – holy war of supremacism 5 Honour killings 6 Taqiyya – sacred lying 7 Taqlid – group think 8 Circular reasoning 9 Misogyny – repression of women 10 Rape of kafirs as jihad prizes 11 Genocide 12 Ethnic cleansing 13 Al-Walaa wal-Baraa – Islamic apartheid 14 Torture 15 Plundering 16 Cruel and unusual punishments 16 Backwardness – stagnation 17 Violence against women 18 Slavery 19 Discriminatory Sharia law 20 Hatred of the arts 21 No music 22 Pedophilia disguised as child marriage 23 Fifty generations of cousin marriage and genetic defects 24 Cruelty to animals 25 Extortion tax to humiliate disbelievers 26 No historic basis 27 Anti-intellectual obscurantism 28 FGM 29 Arab racism 30 Theocratic totalitarianism 31 Vigilantism 32 Amoral, opportunistic character of Mohammed that all Muslims must imitate.
Singh The Sikh says
That’s explains beautifully, in a nutshell, Islam’s evil core. It’s not merely theoratical. It’s real and practical. The consequences of the idealogy are felt on an every-day basis. Everywhere there is Islam, there are untold problems. To top it off, Muslims still have this superior, holier-than-thou attitude. They represent the worst (or is the best) example of delusion, denial and lack of self-awareness. This is to be expected: critical thinking is not allowed so retardation sets in. Combine that with inbreeding and you realize how serious the problem is. The arrogant Muslim attitude in the face of fuck all achievements and contributions to society, and cause of countless misery worldwide, makes one sick to the stomach.
BLC says
Beautiful! These two comments sum it all up.
dumbledoresarmy says
You observed – “The arrogant Muslim attitude in the face of fuck all achievements and contributions to society, and cause of countless misery worldwide, makes one sick to the stomach.”
Yep. There was a Catholic priest, years and years ago, one J L Menezes, who said exactly what you just said, only at greater length, in a book called “The Life and Religion of Mohammed” (1912). It’s one of the most scathing denunciations of Islam ever produced.
Here’s what he says, at length. It simply scorches the paper!
“The Mahommedan religion on the whole with all its dogmatic and moral principles, and with all its positive and negative laws has been a curse to human society.
“Mahommed pretended to confer by his religion a boon, at least on his own countrymen, by giving them in place of gross idolatry a purer faith, and surer moral habits, but in this attempt he has miserably failed and has hopelessly fallen into the very sin he so vehemently assailed.
“Mahommedanism has penetrated into barbarous countries and has forced its inhabitants to accept it as their saving religion, but in doing so it has not succeeded in elevating man’s condition to a higher level – or at least to a level any higher than that of Arabia in Mohammed’s time.
“The Partial and specious reforms which it may have attempted to effect, are vitiated by the fact that they tend to exclude the higher and nobler virtues;
“and as their inner life of families, the whole, the whole tone of society and the intellectual and moral standard of a people depend on the principles of the ruling religion,
“it is hopeless to expect that Islam will ever cease to be what it hitherto proved, the most formidable obstacle to the dawn of a progressive and enlightened civilization.
“How can it be otherwise?
“**No permanent house can be built on a foundation of sand; what permanent civilization and progress then can be expected from a people professing a religion founded on fatalism, polygamy and slavery?** {my emphasis – dda}.
“Their blind belief in inevitable fate, and their antagonism to liberty of thought and action have rendered reform next to impossible; and the professors of this religion seem never to realize their obligation and duty towards the people under their rule, of spreading true civilization, good government and the cultivation of the peaceful arts.
“The natural consequence of this ignorance and blindness has been despotism, mal-administration, bigoted persecution and oppression of their co-religionists.
“In the countries of the Mahommedan world anarchy, rapine, revenge, strife and murder are the order of the day,
thieving, lying, usury and oppression are looked upon more as virtues than vices;
unrestrained licentiousness is carried to unimaginable excess.
“Dirt and filth are things that never come seriously before the attention of Mahommedans;
they seem indeed to prefer living in the most dirty and filthy environment.
“**They are generally illiterate and at the same time self-conceited
and their vainglory in their religion and the nothingness of their own acquirements makes them scorn every other religion;
the meager education which they generally receive when young, makes them believe that there is not much left for them to learn in the world.** {my emphasis – dda}
“In short, Mahommedan countries are the chosen homes of
ignorance, bigotry, tyranny and brutal vice,
and rendezvous for a filthy, unprincipled people, as well as for brigands, felons and freebooters.
“While all other countries not influenced by Islam have made rapid progress in every direction and enjoy the blessings and peace of true civilization,
“Mahommedan countries have remained absolutely opposed to change and reform;
nay, rapacity and extortion have reduced them to a most deplorable state.
“Such is the boon conferred on human society by the Mahommedan religion, and what a benefactor Mahommed has been to his country!
“Who was pleased to give to his country, nay, to the whole world, a religion which, claiming a divine origin as the final and irrevocable standard of morality, has kept its followers sunk in ignorance and barbarism, and has become an insuperable barrier to the regeneration, civilization and progress of the Eastern world.”
Here’s the paragraph that chimes *exactly* with what you posted:
“They [Mohammedans] are generally illiterate and at the same time self-conceited
and their vainglory in their religion and the nothingness of their own acquirements makes them scorn every other religion;
“the meager education which they generally receive when young, makes them believe that there is not much left for them to learn in the world.**
gravenimage says
Good post, Mortimer.
Singh The Sikh says
Why did Canadians elect a rat for PM in the first place? A rat who is leading his country down the path of destruction.
Meanwhile latest pandering to Islam by the Aussie PM which requires a firm rebuttal from Robert Spencer:
http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/malcolm-turnbull-responds-to-pauline-hansons-muslim-comment/news-story/4e0bac39e47aa88589c2edac55e81fb1
Guest says
Because, for a rat, he’s rather good-looking. I honestly believe it’s only his film-star looks that got him into office :(.
Cretius says
Yes, Trudeau did not get elected based on his CV. He is the least qualified of any Prime Minister in Canadian history. The man’s ignorance makes him a dangerous fool and a threat to our freedom and democracy.
brane pilot says
Criticism of the government is now ‘hate speech’ and a crime.
Well, we have arrived. Haven’t we?
Way to go Canada.
I will always remember Dudley Doright. RIP.
Martel says
” If a woman does not cover up she is fair game to be assaulted”
I speak German, and let me tell you what is happening now there is truly shocking, even reporters being sexually assaulted live on air, such is the arrogance and contempt of the mohammadans there now on the streets. What is Germany’s present will be your future Canada unless you do all you can to legally remove these naive fools from power.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn-RBMGDozk&feature=youtube_gdata_player
View the destruction of a beautiful society in Germany and think oh Canada
gravenimage says
Martel, this is *terrifying*. Do you know where in Germany this happened? Was this this the attack in Bern, Switzerland, or was this another attack?
Jon says
Looks like Canada’s going the same way as Sweden where such criticism is open to prosecution. Currently in Australia we have a case underway in Melbourne where the leader of the United Patriot’s FRont is being prosecuted for ‘religious vilification’ due to his criticisms of Islam –
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-06/ufp-court-appearance-sparks-rally-outside-melbourne-court/8327504
Sounds like something out of the Middle Ages!
gravenimage says
This insanity is happening in more parts of the West. Freedom of speech is the cornerstone of our freedoms, and is under attack everywhere.
dumbledoresarmy says
Maybe the Resistance needs to stage some sort of gathering outside of the court as well, and up the ante.
These guys are being hauled into court because they did a mock beheading in order to draw graphic attention to the *fact* that Islam teaches beheading and that many mohammedans *practise* it in accordance with the doctrine.
Well… there’s lots else that could be dramatised, lots more consciousness-raising to be done.
imagine a skit that dramatised “the betrothal and marriage of Mohammed and Aisha” (using puppets, perhaps). With flyers available with the canonical texts right there for everyone to read.
Imagine dramatising the assassinations of the poets! (especially the assassination of Asma Bint Marwan as she lay sleeping in her bed in her own house with her little baby at her breast)… and then reminding people of what was done to the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists, and to Theo Van Gogh.
Lots of factual documented material that needs to be graphically presented before people’s eyes.
BLC says
“every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence”…
…except for all infidels / kafirs.
p says
If they didn’t vote liberal, you mean
gravenimage says
Even if they did vote liberal, they are still at risk from Muslim violence.
p says
His day is coming.. Once they start smoking big buildings with Canadians in them, the sheep will turn and write a nasty letter to him. That will show him!
Soros got him elected.
Robert says
From the article:
” ‘Every member of Parliament — and indeed, every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence,’ PMO spokesman Cameron Ahmad wrote.”
At least two glaring problems in this short paragraph.
1. ‘Every Canadian is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech.’ Only someone who doesn’t understand liberal society would make such a grossly illiberal statement. Free speech is foundational to liberal society and Western Civilization. Free speech sometimes includes words, phrases, sentences, diatribes (whatever) that offend and are hateful. You’ll survive.
2. ‘Hate speech and the threat of violence.’ Ahmad conflates two very different things making them seem like the same thing. But hate speech and the threat of violence are not the same thing. It’s a sleight of hand that’s very intellectually dishonest.
If our nation continues on the trajectory it’s on, then in ten or fifteen years we won’t be free to say anything except what the government has ruled is appropriate. We are following a path that will lead to a closed society, where the liberties we now enjoy will be largely gone.
Trudeau’s vision of Canada, taken to its logical conclusion, includes book burning of some form. Because M-103 demands that anyone who demonstrates any critical thinking against Islam should be scrutinized and condemned for Islamaphobia — and that includes authors, bloggers, websites, publishers, journalists, novelists, academics, public thinkers. Listen again to what the PMO’s spokesperson said — hate speech is the same thing as a threat of violence (remember he conflated these two things) and Islamaphobia, according to M-103, is a form of hate speech.
Every elected politician who votes yes to M-103 betrays our fundamental freedom to say what we will without fear of government reprisal.
Maggy Bastawros says
I am threatened to be put in jail because I express my anger to Justin Trudeau’s gouvernement through twitter. I’m twitting usually to the federal representer of my district…I lived most of my life in persecution and discrimination in Egypt. And now I see things become similar slowly in Canada. The liberal gouvernement is doing irreparable mistakes. They are deeply manipulated by Islamists and they are threading constantly our well being, our life and our freedom.
As a Canadian Citizen, is there any way to immigrate to the USA or to be a refugee from Canada? I know it’s so difficult, but what is the alternative? Yes I’m living my grief. But I am unable to imagine living in a totalitarian, fascist place like this. Please advice me…I’m suffering daily.
dumbledoresarmy says
Maggie – look up the website “Pointe de Bascule”.
And… try to find out who organised the “March for Freedom”, and join the *next* March, when they do it.
Tell your story – you are a Copt? – to your MP. And tell it to every non-Muslm religious leader in Canada. Warn them: this is what life is like for non-Muslim religious minorities, when Muslims dominate.
Halal Bacon says
Call me an islamophobe if I believe the role model of islam, mohamhead is a sexual predator, rapist and murderer (just to start)
mortimer says
Once Sharia law is imposed NO ONE IN CANADA WILL BE SAFE, because Sharia goon squads will patrol and be above the law. They will do what ever violent crime they want and the law enforcement will look the other way.
This is already happening in Sweden.
Halal Bacon says
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
“Ultimately, the Badesha decision should serve to remind those with an interest in advancing religious freedom that despite the bolstering of religious freedom in Canada’s laws and jurisprudence, “not every action will become summarily unassailable and receive automatic protection under the banner of freedom of religion. No right, including freedom of religion, is absolute.”[19] In quoting this statement from the Supreme Court of Canada, Justice Blacklock underscores the reality that religious freedom is indeed subject to limits.”
ninetyninepct says
Every Member of Parliament who is an infidel, not a Muslim, has to be extremely concerned for their safety. The Koran clearly and repeatedly calls for death to infidels. Their fellow Members intend to kill or oppress them.
“Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire,hooked iron rods,boiling water,melt their skin and bellies”
koran 22:191
“Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the koran” koran 8:12
“Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize islam” koran 5:33
“When opportunity arises kill the infidels wherever you find them” koran 9:5
gravenimage says
Unfortunately, all too few Infidels know this.
BLC says
Pierre Trudeau and Justin Trudeau are the epitome of wolves in sheep’s clothing. They’re two socialists / globalists who either have or are running the Liberal Party.
Justin Trudeau thinks Canada is “post-national”, and has “no core values”. By the end of his term, Canada is going to be nothing more than an address for so-called “refugees” to pick up their welfare cheques.
Even when they weren’t running the Liberal Party, the Liberals had people like Jean Chretien, an old Trudeau man, as the leader. The Liberals can’t seem to shake off the Trudeau hex even in a very different time and age.
The Liberal Party needs to change with the times and NO ONE WITH THE TRUDEAU NAME SHOULD EVER BE ALLOWED TO RUN FOR PUBLIC OFFICE AGAIN.
One day Canadians may wake up and wish they had a leader like President Trump or at least wish they had Stephen Harper back as prime minister, but by then, it will likely be too late.
Who can you blame? You get the government you deserve.
Elizabeth Lawson says
With the greatest of respect to the body politic in Ottawa, and specifically to Justin Trudeau, the direction of your governance is leading, disastrously, to that of France. Enabling an already outrageously undemocratic bill…..Islamaphobia’ thus silencing free speech. This proposed bill, is an affront to all free thinking citizens. Jews, Christians, and a host of other citizens are equally in need of protection from slanderous and vile attacks. I cannot recall a representative of either of these groups calling for the deaths of anyone.but all one has to do is listen to madmen ( and women) in mosques) preach on ‘death to infidels’ to get an understanding of ‘phobia’…..these are the groups that need to protected from a wave of incivil ideologues from far away lands. Beginning with Charles de Gaulle’s settlement of thousands of immigrants from Algeria and other Muslim lands, , and ending with the policies and actions of cowardly French ministers in NOT defending their countrymen against broad Muslim assault, France now sits, perilously, on the edge of civil war. Mr. Trudeau, by any measure, you are both intellectually and politically unfit to deal with such weighty matters. Stop this ridiculous first step in destroying. Canada, you know, and we know, that your appeasement will lead to a very bad outcome.
Brian Hoff says
I hear no just talk in the mosque I goto. trump will be driven from office in disgrace.
gravenimage says
Why–for daring to act to protect Americans from Jihad terror?
Sounder says
Muslims don’t need to push for Sharia law, we implement it our selves, and they knew we would.
Lawrence Tierney says
If we are to expose Radical ISLAM in Canada, Then Canadians must be made aware, that the Terrorist Organization “The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD” has infiltrated the LIBERAL Party at the Highest Levels in both the provincial and Federal Governments. MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD Operatives, OMAR ALGHABRA is an advisor and close Friend of Justin “The JUDAS” Trudeau and AHMED HUSSEN is Minister of Immigration.
Please remember that not all Terrorists carry Weapons or wear Suicide Vests, some wear nice suits and have positions of power and trust. These are the Fifth Columnists.
The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD is an Islamic Terrorist Organization whose stated goal is the Destruction of Western Civilization, The creation of a World Wide Islamic Caliphate, the establishment and enforcement of SHARIA LAW over the world (ISLAMIC WORLD DOMINATION) and the eventual cultural and physical Genocide of all Non-Muslims.
The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD is a Very Real and Credible Threat to the Security of Canada.
MUSLIMS Elected to Canada’s Parliament in the 2014 Election
11 Muslim MPs were elected in the last election, 10 are Liberal and one is Conservative. The Liberal MPs are Omar Alghabra (Mississauga Centre, Ont.), Iqra Khalid (Mississauga-Erin Mills, Ont.), Salma Zahid (Scarborough Centre, Ont.), Arif Virani (Parkdale-High Park, Ont.), Majid Jowhari (Richmond Hill, Ont.), Ali Ehsassi (Willowdale, Ont.), Yasmin Ratansi (Don Valley East, Ont.), Ahmed Hussen (York South-Weston, Ont.), Maryam Monsef (Peterborough-Kawartha, Ont.) and Marwan Tabbara (Kitchener South-Hespeler, Ont.). The lone Conservative Muslim MP is Ziad Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning, Alta.).
If Any of MUSLIM Politician in Canada has any ties or links (PAST OR PRESENT) to the following Organizations (KNOWN FRONTS FOR THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD) in any form, they are Members of the Terrorists Organization “The MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD”.
The Organizations are the Council on American-ISLAMIC Relations (CAIR, CAIR-CAN), Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), North American Trust (NAIT), Muslim Student Association (MSA), Canadian Council of IMAMS (CCI), National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM Formerly Known as CAIR-CAN), the Muslim Association of Canada (MAC), The Windsor ISLAMIC Association (WIA) and others not yet identified.
For Example: OMAR ALGHABRA had his political Campaign Financed by the ISNA, IQRA KHALID was a former President of the University of YORK Chapter of the MSA and AHMED HUSSEN who attend YORK UNIVERSITY and has ties to MAC and the MSA. All Three are recognized Fronts for the “MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD”. It was IQRA KAHLID that Initiated M-103, the ISLAMOPHOBIA Motion.
OMAR ALGHABRA and others in the LIBERAL Government are acting as FIFTH COLUMNISTS For ISLAMIC Terrorism.
Fifth Columnists are people who undermine a larger group—such as a nation or a besieged city—from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation. In this, case ISLAM and the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD.
The activities of a Fifth Column can be overt or clandestine. Forces gathered in secret can mobilize openly to assist an external attack. This term is also extended to organized actions by military personnel. Clandestine fifth column activities can involve acts of subversion, sabotage, disinformation and espionage executed within defense lines or a Nations Borders (CANADA) by secret sympathizers with an external force.
For more information, please refer to the articles Linked Below
The TERRORIST & SECURITY NETWORK of CANADA
“HAS THE LIBERAL PARTY BEEN INFILTRATED BY EXTREMIST CANIDATES”
http://tsecnetwork.ca/2015/10/09/has-the-liberal-party-of-canada-been-infiltrated-by-extremist-candidates/
“Are Canada’s Islamists Calling the Shots”
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9184/canada-islamists-silence#.WKczXmw2z9E.facebook
Mackenzie Institute Article: “The Muslim Brotherhood in Canada: Civilization Jihad” by Tom Quggin.
http://mackenzieinstitute.com/muslim-brotherhood-canada-civilization-jihad-2/
Teresa Bolen says
I have a very real fear of Islam and its teachings. There is no irrational phobia here. I believe Islam is incompatible with Canada as a whole. There is one law for everyone in Canada already. Just follow it. People can have any religion they want in Canada. I just don’t want Islam to impact my life economically, spiritually, emotionally or physically. The practices within that religion, such as honor killings, female genital mutilations, wife beatings, and lack of equality women is something our Government should protect us ALL from. In doing so, there would be no outrage except from the Muslims who want Sharia law and special consideration for their religion in our schools, workplaces and on the street.
Carlos Danger says
Don’t allow politicians to take away YOUR freedom of speech. Once it is gone, it will be damned difficult to claw back from those grasping wankers.
Infidel says
https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=oGJRlUEx8EY
Lydia says
I will continue to call it like it is… Islamic terrorism, sexual sin, whatever.
If all these isis jihadis want to invade like a trojan horse and slay everyone, I certainly will not call it ‘gate crashing a wedding’ and ‘joking with plastic knives’!
The only way to preserve the right is to continue to exercise it and that is what I do. I am not afraid of any consequences be they what they may be.
It’s all part of their rhetoric for their agenda, I see the puzzle pieces every day.
Rob Steenwinkel says
Trudeau is also payed by Qatar, Saudi Arabia and George Soros!
Trump To Declare George Soros ‘National Security Threat’
TRUMP DECLARES GLOBALIST SOROS AS “NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT”…USING OBAMA’S 2014 EXECUTIVE ORDER
https://conservativedailypost.com/trump-declares-globalist-soros-national-security-threat-using-obamas-2014-executive-order/
http://yournewswire.com/trump-george-soros-national-security-threat/amp/
https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2016/08/19/de-lange-arm-van-george-soros-3868791-a1517088
https://www.jdreport.com/george-soros-trump-is-een-bedreiging-voor-de-new-world-order/
http://overpassesforamerica.com/?p=19007
Hungarian law targets Soros, foreign-backed NGOs
http://www.politico.eu/article/hungary-vs-civil-society/
ninetyninepct says
“Every member of Parliament — and indeed, every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence,” PMO spokesman Cameron Ahmad wrote. ”
Every single infidel MP had better be very afraid of the Muslim MP’s simply by referring to Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code of Canada.
The Koran violates 318 regarding hate literature and Islam violates 319 – threatening violence against an identifiable group. That “group” is infidels.
Obeying laws based on the Criminal code will require that the Koran and Islam be banned from Canada.
Cretius says
It seems leftist politicians only apply the Criminal Code to non-Muslims. Two standards under Trudeau. He is working to curtail free speech as it pertains to the Islamic belief system. Also, Liberal actions are undermining democracy by favouring the supremacist belief system of Islam.
JCCourt says
“trudeau-examining-ways-to-silence-hateful-criticism-over-anti-islamophobia-motion-”
It is not hateful to have grave concern with the gradual establishment of Sharia in Canada.
Sharia is against Liberal / Western values. Thanks.
Dum Spiro says
How Islam took over the politics of a city in Quebec, Canada
Canadians can be strong enough — if they act decisively now — to prevent the law of Islamic saturation (google it) from forever altering the future for their children and subsequent generations…
— Spero
Helene Shaw says
HE IS A TOTAL DICTATOR!!! He doesn’t care about Canada at all. He’s already calling us the “first post-national country”… they’ve SOLD US OUT FOLKS!!! WORLD BANK’S BEEN PULLING THE STRINGS FOR A WHILE… Just look it up… All started after WWII… Treaty of Versailles… Federal Reserve… World Bank… IMF… United Nations…
They want to destroy who we are so they can control the monetary, political, religious, moral values… of the world. One little bite at a time… for a “good cause”… for the “common good”…
Exactly what Hitler understood and did… brainwash the youth… sell liberal ideas that sound like a great cause when they are really to remove a freedom, a right… Control the propaganda (geoblocking & CRTC).
Ever notice how people try to escape Communist countries, but not free, capitalist countries?
Ayn Rand said it best. “The smallest minority is the individual”. Once you start taking away our basic human rights as individuals, that’s not just bigotry… that’s fascism.
CANADA… THIS IS WHERE WE ARE…