• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Canadian poll: Only 14% like anti-Islamophobia motion M-103

Mar 17, 2017 7:32 pm By Christine Douglass-Williams

Very good news is coming out of Canada, despite the forcefulness of the “anti-Islamophobia agenda” and the slackness of Liberal immigration policy, which has led to unvetted asylum seekers streaming into Canada from the U.S.

A new poll out by Forum Research reveals that only 14% of people support M-103, the anti-discrimination motion put forward by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid that singles out so-called Islamophobia.

Another poll has shown that 74 percent of Canadians want to see a “Canadian values” screening test for immigrants.

Any truly reformist Muslim should reject “anti-Islamophobia” initiatives, which are an element of the stealth Islamization of the West. Canada’s anti-Islamophobia motion M-103 is a follow-up to another motion, e-411, which was passed in parliament in October. E-411 “suggests that attributing terrorism to Islam is Islamophobia.” It stated:

We, the undersigned, Citizens and residents of Canada, call upon the House of Commons to join us in recognizing that extremist individuals do not represent the religion of Islam, and in condemning all forms of Islamophobia.”

No one should be making declarations in the Canadian parliament about who represents Islam. Motion e-411 omits discussion of Muslim Brotherhood strategies for the Islamization of the West via peaceful means. For instance, Dr. Ewis El Nagar’s preaching that the Islamic ruling on slave girls was not abrogated would not appear to place him into the category of “extremist individuals” as defined by e-411, yet preaching such Sharia doctrines clearly is calling for violation of Western laws.

Liberal MP Raj Grewal revealed an ominous intention of the “anti-Islamophobia” motion during the M-103 parliamentary debate of February 15, 2017:

“One of the most important things about the motion that Canadians should understand is that it encourages a committee to collect data and to present that data in a contextualized manner so we, as members of Parliament elected to this chamber, can study it and propose laws.”

“Propose laws.” Part of the argument in support of M-103 was that it was not in the form of a bill, but Grewal has now clearly stated that it is intended to guide attitudes and help in formulating policies that lead to legislation.

Western nations should not be allowing the imposition of religious edicts upon its citizens. The “Islamophobia” scheme of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to silence the freedom of speech in the West and impose Sharia blasphemy laws is no secret.

“Nobody likes M-103, new data reveals”, by Anthony Furey, Toronto Sun, March 13, 2017:

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is crying “Islamophobia” after his government ministers weren’t allowed to campaign in the Netherlands over the weekend in support of his bid to expand his presidential powers.

It’s just another reminder of why this vaguely defined buzzword should never be officially recognized by Western governments.

Thankfully, the vast majority of Canadians also see it this way. A new poll out by Forum Research reveals that only 14% of people support M-103, the anti-discrimination motion put forward by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid that singles out so-called Islamophobia.

Most respondents want to see some sort of change to the wording that brings it in line with suggestions made by Conservative MPs to either mention all religions or none. When broken down by political support, even 71% of Liberals are against the motion’s wording.

Nobody seems to like M-103. And you can’t blame them.

The main argument I’ve made against it is that the term is ripe for abuse. In many countries, “Islamophobia” is criminalized, used to punish apostates or critics of Islam.

Every year, Canada welcomes tens of thousands of people from these countries. While many are coming to escape such nonsense, others will be acclimatized to a broadly-defined “Islamophobia” and support its aggressive application here.

Erdogan’s use of the term is nowhere near as robust as how some Middle Eastern countries employ it.

But it’s still troubling given the context. Turkey has become increasingly Islamist in recent years. Since Erdogan first became prime minister over a decade ago, the federal religious affairs directorate has greatly expanded its budget and overseen the construction of 10,000 new mosques.

While the headscarf was once banned in the public service, it’s now encouraged and even worn by women for career advancement. The Economist notes the governing party has a “subtle but relentless Islamising influence”.

Last summer’s coup, if it had been successful, would have likely put an end to this religious encroachment. Previous coups, like the most recent in 1997, had similar goals.

Instead, Erdogan is now consolidating and expanding his powers. Government ministers are flying around Europe to cities with significant dual national populations, who are eligible to vote in next month’s constitutional referendum, to hold pro-Erdogan rallies. This understandably makes European politicians a tad bit nervous.

The Netherlands incident is far from the first time Erdogan has cried the “I” word. Last year he told CNN he supported “an official declaration that Islamophobia is a crime against humanity”. And right after Brexit he said it was Islamophobia that was keeping Turkey out of the EU.

A couple of weeks ago, German police conducted raids on the homes of four Muslim clerics who were accused of spying on behalf of the government. Religion was only a peripheral component in the police action, yet that didn’t stop the head of Turkey’s religious affairs directorate from denouncing it as “Islamophobia-based hatred.”

Make no mistake about it: There is a correlation between Erdogan’s stance against alleged Islamophobia and his power play to expand Turkey’s Islamist agenda. And it’s not a pleasant one.

Islamophobia is weaponized language and, whether this was Khalid’s intention or not, Canada’s legislators are being asking to give it a stamp of approval.

One of the biggest arguments the motion’s enablers push forward is that M-103 is no big deal because it’s just a motion. Yes and no. It does call for a committee study that creates a pathway to legislation……

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: "Islamophobia", Canada, Featured, free speech Tagged With: Forum Research Poll, M 103


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Bruce says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 7:53 pm

    Refugees have been welcome here for years and they still are .But Islam is not a friendly religion as they cause trouble wherever they go .Ask England and Germany and Sweden and so many other countries , and now they are trying to implement
    Sharia law in our country which gives them total control .They speak and use Taqiyya which is outright lying to get their way and if and when they get in they start right away abusing women and making them wear head covering called hijabs if these laws are implemented in Canada we are no longer free.
    Their desire is to eventually rule the world .NO, Definitely do not want sharia law in this country and before they are granted citizen ship check them out .

    • Robert says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 3:34 am

      why not make Christophobia and Buddhaphobia and Hinduphobia and Atheophobia also an offense???

      • Owen Morgan says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 4:16 am

        That is sort of the point. The muslims persuade cretins like Justin Trudeau to put islam on a pedestal and cretins like Justin Trudeau unhesitatingly oblige. In islam, there is only one kind of blasphemy: any sort of disrespect of islam. Admittedly, muslims interpret the word “blasphemy” pretty broadly; discussing, or even reading, the koran as a non-muslim makes you guilty of blasphemy and I’d hazard a guess that it qualifies you as “islamophobic”, too.

        Islam has invented this looking-glass world, in which it is simultaneously the persecutor AND the victim. Quite why anybody falls for this nonsense escapes me.

        • mortimer says

          Mar 18, 2017 at 5:03 am

          86% of hockey-loving Canadians were not tricked.

        • Anne Smith says

          Mar 18, 2017 at 8:36 am

          Possibly because the cretins only know one thing – they need votes and they see this as ensuring themselves of the block Muslim vote.

        • Jeanette says

          Mar 18, 2017 at 11:46 am

          Mortimer

          And those same hockey-playing Canadians probably weren’t called for this poll.

        • A Harris USA says

          Mar 18, 2017 at 12:14 pm

          Owen, Trudeau is a fool. Or he is a globalist minion.. How can a so called free country make laws that saying anything against Islam illegal??? Is this the forerunner of the globalist agenda? It has to be.. Look how many rant against Jews, Christians and others. I wonder if this law prevents a Christian preacher from saying from the pulpit that Islam is a false religion? I would assume it does. Does Canada plan on making Islam it’s only excepted state religion? Sure sounds like it… OH, Canada, you are doomed!!

      • God's Warrior says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 5:42 am

        Unfortunately as in America some uninformed actually attack Sikhs and Hindus thinking them muslims, Twin Tower terrorists.

        The other religions do not encourage, glorify, reward violence against non-adherents.

        We have no reason to fear them. That would be a legitimate “phobia”.

        • A Harris USA says

          Mar 18, 2017 at 12:20 pm

          God’s Warrior, thank you for the reminder. I am Christian, Orthodox, but have many friends of other faiths, including Hindus and Sikhs, and they are wonderful, hard working Americans. They too, fear the Muslim savage pigs. In their homeland they to suffered terror from these murdering savages. Just ask any Christian who escaped from the hell of a Muslim country. Nothing good can ever come from Islam!! Never has, never will.

      • abobinmn says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 8:30 am

        Because those religions don’t still encourage their member to rape non members and lop off the head of nonbelievers Junior. That’s why.

      • abobinmn says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 8:30 am

        Because those religions don’t still encourage their member to rape non members and lop off the head of nonbelievers Junior. That’s why.

      • Jeanette says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 11:39 am

        Because Islam is the only organization (I won’t say “religion”) with an Operator’s Manual that instructs that everyone else be killed (unless we’re talking about juicy young children, of course).

    • mortimer says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 5:01 am

      Bruce wrote: “Islam is not a friendly religion”

      No, it is not. It contains an ‘essential’ doctrine called al Walaa wal Baraa (allegiance and disavowal) which is Islamic apartheid. That doctrine commands Muslims to ‘hate’ kafirs ‘for the sake of Allah’ as a precondition of going to Islamic paradise. This ‘hatred’ towards kafirs is REQUIRED both in belief and in practice and incumbent upon ALL Muslims.

      Islam is not ‘friendly’ at all. Muslims recite curses upon Jews and Christians 17 times a day.

      • kikorikid says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 10:06 pm

        Islam does not come to integrate or assimilate.
        Islam comes ONLY to: Conquer, Submit, Convert, or Kill.

      • gravenimage says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 10:15 pm

        All true, Mortimer.

    • Robert McKenna says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 7:20 am

      Mortimer:
      As long as you have a bed wetter like “Toodle-oooo” as the head man(?) It doesn’t make a damn whether 14 % don’t like the pro muslim legislation. You’re going to have it.
      The brave Canadian spirit is being legally killed in favor of non assimilating, whining, demonstrating, welfare sucking, muslims.
      :You will no longer be able to tell the truth about muslims 7th century, barbaric cult. Honor killing ? OK !
      Female mutilating for young girls ? OK ! Welfare for multiple wives w/ children ? OK ! Special use of taxpayer funded facilities for only muslims ? OK! taking part of your cities for only muslims ? OK !
      Enjoy ! The world will miss Canadians !

      • gravenimage says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 10:35 pm

        Robert, it is not that 14% of Canadians don’t like the pro-Muslim legislation, its that only 14% like it. In other words, *86%* of Canadians don’t like it.

      • Susan Cusack says

        Mar 19, 2017 at 1:31 pm

        Robert McKenna – We aren’t finished yet. If the world thinks Canadians will give up THAT easily, it forgets our past.

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 11:31 am

      I wondered the moment I saw the title of this article, about how the polls were done.

      Here in the US a poll can be made to say anything the pollsters want; they just make sure they are asking questions of the right people.

      I have even had a pollster hang up on me the moment he realized I wasn’t going to support his pro-Obama poll.

      I’m glad to hear one Canadian who doesn’t want to hand Canada over to the Muslims, and I would bet that there are a lot of “regular folks” in Canada who agree.

      • Ted says

        Mar 19, 2017 at 9:43 am

        I bring this subject up to many of my fellow Canadians and I am not surprised by their reply as we as a people are capable of determining what is best for us as a nation. Trudeau who was pictured sitting in a Mosque in his white garments in the front row with his Islamic buddies. On his holidays riding in the Agha Kahns helicopter with his family to the Aghas island and then conspiring with a small minority of his party to create a bill which would cause us to be thrown in jail if we dared to be critical of Islam. I want Trudeau to have a referendum and ask the Canadian people to see if they want Islamic Sharia, to have a standing in our country. The questions would be. #1-The penalty for refusing to become a Muslim and being killed for refusal. Yes or NO. #2 All women must be required to fully cover themselves with cloth so as not to cause a man to be tempted, must be worn at all times other than in the home. Yes or No.#3 All Jews must be eliminated from our society even if they want to convert to Islam. Yes or No. All females must be circumcised .Yes or No. All music, and sports or arts are to be practiced. Yes or No. Women must have 4 male witnesses to obtain a divorce and Males need 1. Yes or NO. Families are permitted to kill any relatives who are thought to bring dis-honour on there family name. Yes or No. These I believe are legitimate question which have raised concerns by Canadians caused by the horrible actions of Islamists in Europe, The U.S.A. and in our own country. I am sure we could get Robert Spenser to recommend a good interpreter of the Koran if need be. This is what Herr Trudeau owes to us the people of Canada if he wants to announce to the world that his policy is what we are in agreement with. The referendum must cover all the legal citizens of Canada.

        • Susan Cusack says

          Mar 19, 2017 at 1:27 pm

          Ted – Surely by now you realize that The Little Dick Tater in Ottawa isn’t going to allow us any say in anything. His goal is to destroy Canada so the UN can take control of our money, food, water, land and resources. That can’t be done if Canadians stay strong and independent so he’s welcoming savages to end that. If we don’t address this issue NOW, we are in for decades of violence. Turdo, of course, will be kept safe and live a life of luxury, as will all global elitists who are causing the death of Capitalism so that they’re the only ones on the planet who have money and power. Do you want to live as a slave, or see your children live that way? That’s the goal. It’s no coincidence that Turdo and many European politicians welcome moose slimes; islam mindlessly uses violence to achieve submission.
          The recent vote in The Netherlands tells us that Europe is all but finished. Canada is next and is considered an easy win because of our obvious stupidity. Americans tried to resist this take-over, but with the coup d’etat going on there, they’ll ultimately fail – UNLESS President Trump finds and jails those in security organizations who are feeding lies to the press.
          Meanwhile, back in Canada, the flood of undesirables coming from the south will be added to the ones Turdo is welcoming and quicken the pace of the death of Canada.
          The West needs to separate from Canada immediately. It’s our only hope of survival. No politician of any stripe can – or will – save us. They’re all in on it – except Brad Wall.

    • Susan Cusack says

      Mar 19, 2017 at 1:04 pm

      Justa Turdo told us clearly before he was elected that he preferred dictatorship. Why would we now be surprised when he imposes one on Canada? Many Canadians see what’s going on with i slam and think, “I won’t worry. That can’t happen here.” The people of Sweden, Belgium, Germany, France and England thought the same thing and their countries are now so completely infested that it would take 15 years of civil war to clean them up. Is this what we want for Canada? If we do nothing, our children and grandchildren will never forgive us. We have the power to stop it but only if we do it RIGHT NOW. Three years from now it’ll be too late.
      As if that wasn’t a big enough problem, we now also have the worst kind of Mexicans oozing across our southern border. They’re every bit as nasty as moose slimes. Will Canadians grow a backbone and defend their country or will they submit and give it away to savages?

  2. Matthieu Baudin says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 8:06 pm

    Your average citizen has a clear head about these things, being more intent to protect themselves and their families than trying to save Traditional Islam from itself or shielding it from outside scrutiny.

  3. concerned canadian says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 8:08 pm

    Canadians are apathetic.Quebecers
    are more outspoken of us all.
    i am watching islam closely.
    Everyone i know i weary of it.
    Not the moderates… usual follow up..
    but the dudes who choose to pray
    at a 401 rest stop or any other oublic place.

    i see these idiots washing there feet. one dude with socks on. i know its comin. i say wtf buddy!!!, then i will be labeled a vety very bad man jerry!!!

    • mortimer says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 5:04 am

      The 14% are the hard-core idiots who voted for Turd-d’oh’s hair.

      • Skep says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 8:35 am

        Turdo has such sexy hair, but under that, not much in brains unfortunately.

        • Jeanette says

          Mar 18, 2017 at 11:34 am

          Of course!

          There has undoubtedly been some hideous, murderous, evil dictator who had nice hair. So what? !!!!

        • Susan Cusack says

          Mar 19, 2017 at 1:32 pm

          He has his father, Fidel Castro’s hair.

    • Ted says

      Mar 19, 2017 at 9:51 am

      I had an e-mail last week and I don’t know if it is true or not but the source is I believe dependable. I read that the feds want to install a section in the Pearson Airport that is exclusively for Islamics to pray in, It would include feet washing facilities and allow them to pray in private. Why do we taxpayers have to pay for a small minority to practice an Ideology that proposes to kill us?

      • Susan Cusack says

        Mar 19, 2017 at 1:34 pm

        Ted – Why? Because they think we’re too polite to do anything about it. We need to prove them wrong.
        If we don’t start physically resisting this bulls**t, it will continue and get much, much worse.

  4. livingengine says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 8:26 pm

    Check out this community meeting with a Canadian MP. How easy is it for you to identify with these people?

    • David G. says

      Mar 17, 2017 at 10:14 pm

      Great video. Thanks for posting.

    • WTF is wrong with people says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 12:59 am

      That isn’t the first time I have heard complaints about schools in Milton. I watched a video on Kevin Johnston’s channel, Freedom Report. He was interviewing a woman who had some rather disturbing complaints against the school. Eventually she just pulled her kids out and put them in private school.

      • Jeanette says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 11:42 am

        Great for her kids, but many people can’t afford private school, especially if they still have to pay taxes to support the abusive public schools.

    • billybob says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 1:01 am

      That was a very interesting video. People of different ethnic background earnestly trying to work things out. They were obviously very stimulated by the topic. Seems the vast majority are very much against the legislation against “Islamophobia”, and they are clear on the irony of that word that trivializes justifiable fear of a religion that wants to kill us. I don’t think the word is going to fly in the legislature. These politicians of all stripes must realize this by now. Certainly that Pakistani Khaled or whatever her name was who raised the bill has been deluged with what she calls “hate mail”, as have been people on the committee. They should just drop M-103 like a hot potato. It is generating more hate than existed before it was proposed. It’s fine with me if they pretend it got preempted by something more pressing to save face.

  5. Oliver says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 8:46 pm

    I would vebnture that of the 14% who like the bill, most are Muslims.

    But, i would want to know: HOW MANY PEOPEL WERE POLLED?

    And where-and what was the wording?

    I ( and others) have posted that polls (in the US, anyhow) are based on a small sample- say 1,000 or 1,00 people.’

    And, resuklts could vary-as to where the questions are asked, and how phrased.

    And meanwhile, I am sure, that the Canadians, like many of the assholes in the US who ar ein postions of power, will keep on voting for the incumbents- who feather their own nest and fatten their offshore bank acocunts.

    • gravenimage says

      Mar 17, 2017 at 11:34 pm

      Oliver wrote:

      I would vebnture that of the 14% who like the bill, most are Muslims.
      ………………..

      Oliver, Canada is only 3.2% Muslim–so unless this sample was *very* skewed, which seems unlikely, then at least some of these supporters had to be clueless Infidels.

      • gravenimage says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 11:13 pm

        They should not be in a place like Canada in the first place.

  6. David thatcher says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 9:41 pm

    One of the alarming things concerns the number of people, including me, who had their FaceBook accounts blocked because of innocent comments published in Canada’s National Post news outlet. Comments that expressed concern about M-103. I was initially annoyed that FB required that I submit proof of ID, including photo ID as in Passport, until I found out that I was only one of many who experienced the same thing. Then I became very alarmed that something untoward was going on.

    • David thatcher says

      Mar 17, 2017 at 10:13 pm

      Pay attention to the vast majority of Canadians, Mr. Trudeau. Neglect them at your peril, if you are thinking about re-election.

  7. somehistory says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 9:59 pm

    And all 14% are either moslim or supporters of moslims. The average Jane and John Doe of anywhere in the world would not want special rules that prohibit one from speaking freely about whatever they wish to speak if it had been explained to them just what was being asked…
    Furthermore, IMO, anyone who agrees with moslims on their code or wishing to stop the truth from getting out…is already a moslim at heart whether they claim to be moslim or not.

  8. Tokenn says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 10:20 pm

    M-103 is clearly a trial balloon by the government to see how far they can push pro-Islamist and pro-Sharia censorship. Nobody should be fooled by the assertion that the motion was ‘non-binding’. Fortunately the trial balloon has been shot down…

  9. Sassy says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 10:26 pm

    The motion mentions a ”holistic approach”. This means forced indoctrination by rehabilitation in a mosque for a few weeks.

    • mortimer says

      Mar 17, 2017 at 11:05 pm

      Sassy, it means creating a NEW BRANCH of government that will perform WITCH HUNTS to track down everyone who makes a TWITTER comment or verbal comment in PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS. They will then be EXPOSED, SHAMED AND PUNISHED by FIRING or preventing them from ever receiving GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS.

      That will guarantee that ONLY MUSLIMS will get any GOVERNMENT WORK and they will then infiltrate and CONTROL ALL OF CANADA within a few years!

  10. Stan Lee says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 10:44 pm

    If Canadians feel the way they do about being driven by their government to “mind their P’s and Q’s” concerning speaking out against Muslim excesses, they didn’t show it when they elected the second Trudeaux. Perhaps they fail in making a distinction between a “globalist” and a “patriot.” Trudeaux is a “globalist” as much as Obama was in the U.S.A, and I’m so thankful he’s gone. He was the worse “flop” in American history.
    If 74% of Canadians don’t support the M-103 thing, they cannot allow themselves to be intimidated by their government, a government that by its nature presumes that Canadians may not treat the imported Muslims as long lost relatives….which they are not. They (Arabs) may as well realize, early on, that Canadians will not invite them to do as they would have done in their former homeland, had it remained an “as usual” Arab country before even worse Arabs, pledged to conquest by terrorism took the lives of hundreds of thousands in what amounts to Syrian civilians suffering persecution by murderers fighting and terrorizing to bring a population to its knees for a caliphate.
    Trudeaux is requiring Canadians to make overly liberal allowances to these new immigrants, instead of him having a program for them to understand how the real Canadians function peacefully. Obviously, Trudeaux has been insulated from middle-class Canadian life, so it’s not solely incumbent upon Canadians to observe rules and regulations created with the Muslims in mind, PM Trudeaux needs to learn how the people of Canada truly feel, too. Canadians, in any of my experiences with them, are friendly, good, people and not the kind who will take advantage of anyone, and they love their country unconditionally.

    • BLC says

      Mar 17, 2017 at 11:11 pm

      I can tell you that at least with this Canadian, the unconditional love is wearing a tad thin these days. First, I watched Pierre Trudeau introduce multiculturalism, now I’m watching Justing Trudeau introduce Sharia law, (M-103). In another decade or so, this country is going to be unrecognizable to the veterans who fought in two world wars for freedom. There’s not much to love about a country like that.

      • WTF is wrong with people says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 12:34 am

        Don’t give up on us. Younger generations haven’t forgotten about the brave patriots who fought and continue to fight for us. My husbands grandfathers both fought and so did both of mine. The West will always stand strong. Trudeau has very little support on this side. Especially with his stance on Alberta. The West takes that as a personal attack, believe me. I know it looks hopeless somedays but I can guarantee there are more of us willing to stand up than what they report or show. It is a ploy by the media. They don’t want to show patriots protesting or report that they are fighting this garbage because they know more will fall in line. Alot of people just follow with the group they think is winning because they are cowards. True Canadians love their country. I know I do, and I refuse to roll over and let it be reduced to garbage for my kids to grow up in.

        • BLC says

          Mar 18, 2017 at 1:16 am

          You’re right. Come what may, we have to do what we know is right.

        • Jeanette says

          Mar 18, 2017 at 11:52 am

          NEVER GIVE UP!

          Winston Churchill

      • Kepha says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 10:26 pm

        I’ve always thought that Canada probably has vast numbers of bedrock, commonsensical people of whom the MSM never speaks. You’ve got a cheering section among your southern neighbors.

    • berserker says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 6:09 pm

      Canadians in Trudeau’s riding elected him. There is no direct election for the post of PM.

      • Jean says

        Mar 20, 2017 at 8:31 pm

        i believe soros, clinton and the muslims got that slime into office so it was really voted fraud. remember ppl our votes don’t count. i didn’t vote for the slime anyways coz i knew he was bad news.

  11. BLC says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 10:52 pm

    Justin Trudeau could have had Canadians vote in a referendum on whether we wanted to flood the country with Muslims who aren’t even real refugees before he just arbitrarily went ahead like a dictator and did it anyway. That was about the first thing he did when he was elected. Who asked him to do it? It wasn’t the Canadian people.

  12. mortimer says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 10:59 pm

    M-103 is a WOLF IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING!

    They are introducing M-103 as a PROTECTION FOR VICTIMS… HOWEVER, IT IS ACTUALLY INTRODUCING SHARIA LAW!

    Sharia law is DRACONIAN and punishes BLASPHEMY WITH DEATH!

    All Canadian citizens are at risk of LOSING THEIR FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION FOREVER!

  13. gravenimage says

    Mar 17, 2017 at 11:25 pm

    Canadian poll: Only 14% like anti-Islamophobia motion M-103
    ……………………………….

    Excellent news!

    More:

    Another poll has shown that 74 percent of Canadians want to see a “Canadian values” screening test for immigrants.
    ……………………………….

    As is this. Patriotic Canadians offer me hope.

    • mortimer says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 4:52 am

      If 14% of in favor of M-103, then 86% are against it. This is more evidence that the hockeyplaying Canadians will slam these Libtards against the boards in the next elections.

      • Jeanette says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 11:58 am

        Canada would be better off if it could recall or impeach and throw out Trudeau.

        America couldn’t get her non-Marxist, non-communist legislators off their derrieres to do that to Obama, but it wasn’t because millions of us didn’t try!

      • gravenimage says

        Mar 18, 2017 at 11:32 pm

        I hope so, Mortimer.

  14. No Fear says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 1:22 am

    Was Mohammed an extremist? Is he an “excellent example” for mankind? I would like to see the Govt of Canada answer those two questions.

  15. Native jo says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 4:01 am

    It’s a horrible rule. It make Canadians guilty at the whim of any Muslims accusations. Even though there has been hoaxes, and the hate crimes they report are mostly rude comments, or even true statements about their religion and “prophet”.

  16. God's Warrior says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 4:10 am

    Now it’s time to implement a Nonislamophobia Law. Bill M-108.

    We already have hate speech laws, pedophilia laws, bigomy laws, wife-beatng laws, (honour-) killing laws, but now we need to aim our disapproval at the Nonislamophobia that fills their add-on warlord scriptures. After sponsoring 1400 years of indescribably vicious violence, that aggressive stance towards everything that is not Islam must be eradicated.

    Divine justification to murder/rape/rob/enslave every Canadian must be rejected and considered unlawful here; and quoting it or possessing it should be considered a crime against humanity, against Canadian law.

    Do I have a second?

  17. mortimer says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 4:50 am

    It’s a POLITICAL TOOL to stop criticism of the Libertard government’s ALL-MUSLIM IMMIGRATION POLICY.

  18. claudepio says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 7:44 am

    Do you think the Canadian government especially this one gives a hoot about what Canadians want?

  19. duj swami says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 7:49 am

    Allah is gong to be pzzed when he hears of this…

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 12:01 pm

      Does any decent human being care if Satan is pissed off?

  20. Brenda Romano says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 7:55 am

    “Western nations should not be allowing the imposition of religious edicts upon its citizens.” Aren’t “blasphemy laws” against Islam a religious edict? According to Sharia anyone criticizing Islam = a death sentence.
    “An official declaration that Islamophobia is a crime against humanity.” It is not a “crime against humanity” to point out tenets of a religion that are dangerous to Western civilization. BUT BEHEADINGS ARE A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY!

  21. Crusades Were Right! says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 8:30 am

    Only a bigot and racist could possibly object to the accommodation of a group who believe in aggressive warfare, colonial expansion, supremacy, the right to possess slave-girls, sexual inequality, persecution of those of other faiths and the genocide of any group that won’t bend the knee to them.

    Natch?

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 18, 2017 at 11:59 am

      Works for the Muslims!

  22. von says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 9:32 am

    I attended an anti M-103 protest last week at the local city hall ,if according to the latest polls 86% are against M-103 it certainly did not show in the numbers in attendance, we were greatly outnumbered by the pro Islamophobia group and their Mohammedan puppet masters. There is another protest this week on sunday let’s hope the “good guys” show up in large numbers , our freedom of speech is at risk like never before with Jihadi Justin Turd-O in the drivers seat.

    • gravenimage says

      Mar 19, 2017 at 12:02 am

      Good for you for attending, von.

  23. DanC says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 9:51 am

    Making matters worse and more confusing, Patrick Brown (leader of “Conservatives” Ontario) voted FOR islamophobia motion in provincial parliament Ontario. He’s supposed to be Opposition – bring arguments, fight Liberals, be FOR the people that elected you as MP.
    No, in Ontario the motion against islamophobia was unanimous! 🙁 How stupid is this?!?

  24. ECM says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 3:24 pm

    Another poll has shown that 74 percent of Canadians want to see a “Canadian values” screening test for immigrants.

    “Canadian values”* are what led to the country rapidly becoming an Islamic outpost.

    *A noxious strew of multi-culti bromides that Muslims are all-too-happy to take advantage of…for the time being.

    • gravenimage says

      Mar 19, 2017 at 12:06 am

      I don’t believe those are Canadian values. If this is what most Canadians meant then they would not be opposed to M-103.

  25. davej says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 3:44 pm

    Some good news here but it points up the urgency of learning about Islam’s intent and acting against it before there are even more Muslim voters or Muslim MPs. All it would take is the combination of Muslims, leftist sympathizers and the ignorant or apathetic to approach a majority and it is game over forever.

  26. Angemon says

    Mar 18, 2017 at 8:05 pm

    A new poll out by Forum Research reveals that only 14% of people support M-103, the anti-discrimination motion put forward by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid that singles out so-called Islamophobia.

    Another poll has shown that 74 percent of Canadians want to see a “Canadian values” screening test for immigrants.

    Why, I never imagined there would be so many “racist bigoted islamophobes” in Canada!

  27. talker says

    Mar 19, 2017 at 3:50 am

    I know it complicates matters but the average born Muslim in the sense that they hate and detest Islam, and live their lives much as the rest of us do doesn’t deserve discrimination. They did not choose to have the word “Muslim” stamped all over their birth certificates. Children should not be the target for religions. There should be protection in place from forcing children to religious observance. They have better things to learn.

  28. Elizabeth Lawson says

    Mar 19, 2017 at 2:10 pm

    With the greatest of respect, Mr.Erdogan, exhort your Turkish apologists to have their five children at home in Turkey, at the expense of YOUR government and long suffering citizens. We all know that you are setting yourself and your country up as the new hegemonic power in the Middle East. Having heavy influence in the West would unquestionably aid your driving ambitions. The West neither needs nor wants your questionable ‘expertise’ in governance nor population matters, nor might I hasten to add, your Islamic convictions. My advice to you, sir, is stay home, and keep your own citizens at home as well, unless of course they become full and enthusiastic supporters of democratic principles and Christianity.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • James Lincoln on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.