“Masood was a ‘very religious, well spoken man. You couldn’t go to his home in Birmingham on Friday because he would be at prayer.'”
If Masood had been a “very religious” Christian, the establishment media would be investigating what was taught at his church, and publishing searching features about the crisis within Christianity. But since he was a “very religious” adherent of a religion that mandates warfare against unbelievers and thrice repeats in its holy scripture the demand that believers must “kill them” (2:191, 4:89, 9:5), the establishment media is busy doing what it always does after a jihad massacre: making sure that no one thinks ill of the killer’s motivating ideology.
“London terrorist Khalid Masood’s real name revealed as Adrian Russell Ajao probed by MI5,” by Joey Millar and Zoie O’Brien, Express, March 24, 2017:
KHALID Masood has been named as the terrorist behind the London terror attack – a violent, bodybuilding, career criminal born in Kent as Adrian Russell Ajao.
The Met Police said the 52-year-old, shot dead on Wednesday by police gunman after his twisted rampage, was a married father to three children….
Masood was not born a Muslim but converted to Islam. He was said to be a “fitness freak” and bodybuilder….
One source described him as “a big bloke, he looked like he was a bodybuilder, wouldn’t want to mess with him”.
He added Masood was a “very religious, well spoken man. You couldn’t go to his home in Birmingham on Friday because he would be at prayer”….
Chabuco says
#NothingToDoWithIslamWhatsoever
Eugene R Dutton says
I’m not Islamophobic, how about Islamopposjtionist?
762x51FMJ says
Samuel Langhorne Clemens (1835 – 1910), well known by his pen name Mark Twain,
That is a simple rule, and easy to remember. When I, a thoughtful and unblessed Presbyterian, examine the Qur’an, I know that beyond any question every muslim is insane; not in all things, but in religious matters.
Don Foss says
Reading now The Race for Timbuktu, an true adventure that covers a few decades of the British trying to find this fabled city in Africa and also map the Congo and Niger Rivers. The greatest danger to these brave men were not the elements like the Sahara or dysentery and disease. It was being Christian and from Christian lands. One early explorer was the victim of a particularly gruesome Muslim game of wrapping a long rope around the explorer’s neck and tying each end of it off to horse who on the slap of their holders bolted in different directions…a quite original way to behead a Christian. Also, read Into Africa, the story of Stanley and Livingston and their predecessors trying to map the Nile and find its source. Same damned thing: Islam and Muslims (besides their brutal slaving raids and sex slavery. Read Khartoum, and the story of Colonel Gordon. Same thing: Islam and Muslims. He met a sad fate. History is full of stories of Islamic and Muslim brutality to others through the ages, and probably 99% of it has been unrecorded and lost to history.
gravenimage says
London jihad murderer was “very religious”
……………….
Of course he was. And for a Muslim, being “very religious” leads to waging violent Jihad, murdering the “filthy Infidels”.
Pastor C says
When will we, in the West, ‘get it!’ I’m sorely afraid, the answer to that question is, “As soon as it’s too late!”
Terry says
Pastor C
Many people, including Pres Trump realize this. BUT the anal pores in Congress (Schumer, Pelosi, Muddy Waters; Blumenthal; McCain; Graham; etc –( to name just a few) and the courts, block him.
james.mich says
That is what people forget, or ignore: that having a religion is totally compatible with kicking puppies, practicing human sacrifice, and being an Omnicidal Maniac. Religious behaviour is unlikely to be peaceable, if the religion in question exalts or commands violence and hatred.
Anne Smith says
Substitute the word “devout” for “radicalised” and you have the answer.
mortimer says
All his neighbors thought the murderous Khalid Masood was a ‘nice, relaxed, calm, generous’ fellow.
IT’S THE IDEOLOGY, STUPID!
Michael says
The more religious, the worse it is … with Islam. He REALLY believed in killing infidels. Perhaps there are degrees.
‘I prefer others do it, but I’ll support the killers’ …
‘I’ll do it if I’m getting old and worried about my place with the virgins’ …
‘I’ll do it, but I sort of like my welfare handouts and the comfy life I have courtesy of the dhimmis. Do I have to?’ …
‘I’ll do it, just say the word’ …
‘I can’t wait to do it! What the hell was I born for?’
davej says
Allah would be proud of you, if he existed as anything beyond the superstitious vestiges of a criminal hatemonger and pedophilic mastermind.
Headline: Murderer was very Religious!
Well that’s the problem then, innit it?
Robert John Bennett says
I am mystified by the BBC’s reporting of a police statement that they may “never understand” why Khalid Masood carried out the attack at Westminster on Wednesday.
The man was a convert to Islam. The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call on Muslims to make war on unbelievers. To take one example, Sura 2, verse 191 proclaims: “And kill the unbelievers wherever you find them….”
What is it about that statement that the police may “never understand.”
TheDane says
Yep! We could have told them that. All these moslem monsters are very religious, and we can just start wondering how many of these ‘very religious’ scumbags we have inside our borders. How many worldwide? 10 yrs ago I read that someone estimated that there was 350 million potential jihadis worldwide.
What a sick bunch, those moslems! Imagine how they get up in the morning, drink their halal-coffee and then contemplate how to go and kill innocent women, men, children and even babies!? Their manual is the quran.
John A. Marre says
Practicing their religion means killing infidels. Not hard to understand.
Martin says
It’s astonishing that with the consistently high number of Muslims that seem to have misunderstood their religion, that no Western government has proposed any type of supervsion program for what is taught in mosques. That apparently is unacceptable, but there appears to be no amount of victims dead at the hands of Muslims that have misunderstood their religion that is similarly unacceptable.
They write “hate speech” laws to silence people that point out these inconsistencies and failures in policy, but when the “radicalized on the internet” narrative can’t be employed and we know the jihadi frequented mosque, then what? What is the policy then? What measures are put into place to help ensure it doesn’t happen again? There aren’t any!
Sanity would dictate that whenever a mosque is affiliated with a jihadist, that mosque should be put on some type of official supervision. Instead, our leaders only see an opportunity to form an envoy to go to the mosque and assure its leadership that they in no way suspect them or will attempt to hold them accountable for what they are teaching the people who attend. To put them on supervision is not to indict them, but you have to do something. To ignore the association between the jihadist and the mosque and accept every denial of accountability at face value is insane.
How high does the pile of dead non-Muslim bodies have to get before they start seriously considering such measures? Does it have to blot out the sun?
Kay says
+ 1
It really doesn’t make sense. All our leaders ought to be aware of what happened (most lately) in London and speaking up about it. If for no other reason than an American was killed. Am I missing their statements? Around me, it’s so “pc” that no one mentions it at all–not even to say it’s sad or scary. We’ll see what happens at church today.
Jeanette says
I posted this on another article, so anyone who saw it there, please excuse!
Why are elites protecting Muslims?
The Muslims are being protected by the elites for a reason. That reason can’t be that all elites have IQs below 80. It can’t be that all are sleeping with Muslims. It can’t be that all are being paid off by Saudi Arabia, because Saudi Arabia is seriously short of cash right now.
So what could it be? It has to be something that Muslims can provide for the elites, so what do Muslims do well?
About the only things that Muslims excel at are killing and reproducing. Both would be useful in overwhelming and then eliminating the main block to the globalists’ plan of massive world population reduction: western civilization. Most westerners are too decent to support massive global depopulation.
I submit that this is why these globalist elites stand by while Muslims slaughter westerners. It’s also why Muslims are allowed to practice herd breeding in countries where polygamy has been illegal for at least hundreds of years. And it’s why the elites disarmed most western countries before they began dumping hordes of Muslims on western populations.
Sound crazy? Research U.N. Agenda 2030.
2030 is not far off.
dumbledoresarmy says
You speak continually of ‘globalists’ and ‘elites’.
NAMES, please.
Come on.
Where is the list of NAMES?
Who *are* these ‘globalists’ and ‘elites’ of whom you so darkly speak?
And – who, in *any* government anywhere in the world, at any level, from county dog-catcher on up, is NOT ‘in on it’, this vast intergenerational omnipotent omniscient network of puppetteers??
Paul Ashley says
“You couldn’t go to his home in Birmingham on Friday because he would be at prayer.’”
And what was he praying about, hmmm? According to many firmer muslims, Friday prayers consisted mostly of prayers for the death of infidels.
vecta says
This is about culling the West. It always has been. The average IQ of white Christian males is quite high, higher than Muslims’ who clearly have low IQs. Bright, fit, healthy, active caucasians are a very real threat to the so-called elite now that they have no need of us due to computers and robot technology doing all the work in the future. They want this lot to replace us, they are prone to perversion and their children will absorb all their gay propaganda, the mosques will eventually close due to apathy, laziness and greed just like the churches are closing now!
dumbledoresarmy says
‘Always’???
Since WHEN, exactly?
And once again, as I ask all those who posit a vast intergenerational international conspiracy (seemingly untouched by the vicissitudes of Time, Chance and Death) that comprises the ***real** ‘rulers of the world’, WHO?
Come on, dates.
Local habitations and names.
Or perhaps I should ask y ou to specify who ISN’T part of The Conspiracy, and .. how do you tell they are not?