• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Prince Charles tried to halt Afghan invasion to “honor Ramadan”

Mar 31, 2017 8:46 pm By Robert Spencer

Imagine if Prince Charles had been around in 1944. Would he have tried to halt the invasion of Normandy to honor Hitler’s birthday?

(Yes, I know Hitler’s birthday was in April and the invasion of Normandy was in June. I am trying to make a point.)

“EXCLUSIVE The day Prince Charles tried to halt a war: How the future king phoned the US ambassador to ask for a delay on the Afghan invasion… because he wanted to ‘honour’ Ramadan,” by Sam Greenhill, Daily Mail, March 31, 2017 (thanks to Marc):

Prince Charles tried to halt the American invasion of Afghanistan to ‘honour’ Ramadan.

He made the plea to the US ambassador to London four weeks into the huge military operation launched after the 9/11 terror attacks.

The startled envoy asked the prince, ‘Sir, are you really serious?’ according to a book being serialised from today by the Daily Mail. Charles’s intervention appears to have been made behind the back of then prime minister Tony Blair.

Last night an officer who led UK forces in Afghanistan said the prince’s request was absurd. Critics described it as grossly irresponsible. Politicians in the UK are used to the prince trying to meddle in policy and his handwritten ‘black spider memos’ are legendary.

Twenty thousand American and British troops were ordered to Afghanistan by George W Bush and Mr Blair in October 2001 because the ruling Taliban had refused to give up Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden.

Around a month into the offensive – and two weeks before the start of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan – Charles placed an ‘urgent call’ to William Farish, Washington’s ambassador to London.

Interviewed for the new biography of Charles, Mr Farish recalled: ‘Prince Charles asked me if it would be possible to stop the invasion to honour Ramadan, and if I could convey that request to President Bush.’

The ambassador explained it would be rather difficult to halt a military invasion already in full swing, but the prince allegedly protested: ‘But Americans can do anything!’

The envoy asked: ‘Sir, are you really serious?’ and the heir to the throne replied, ‘Yes I am’….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: dhimmitude, Featured, United Kingdom, Useful idiots Tagged With: Prince Charles


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Vikram Chatterjee says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 8:51 pm

    Charles’ objection is dumb, but also slightly comical.

    There were many good reasons to not invade Afghanistan, but Raman was not one of them.

    • Vikram Chatterjee says

      Mar 31, 2017 at 8:57 pm

      *Ramadan

      Oops.

      • billybob says

        Mar 31, 2017 at 11:52 pm

        It’s “Ramadam”.

        • Jeanette says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 10:07 am

          No, it’s not; it’s “Ramadan.”

          I was in Saudi Arabia for eleven Ramadans.

        • billybob says

          Apr 2, 2017 at 8:23 am

          I always spell it “Ramadam”. Sometimes I spell it Rama-dama-ding-dong. Try to stop me!.

    • Havoc says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 12:23 am

      Charles has lived his entire life in fantasy land. It shows.

      • ECAW says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 2:59 am

        True, and what better time to invade Afghanistan than when the opposing forces are debilitated through thirst and hunger?

      • Lia Wissing says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 3:12 am

        At one time i was intensely sorry for the man, who could not marry Camilla and whose mother would not let him be king. Seems she had a point, at least with reference to the latter decision.

        • BINDON blood says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 4:59 am

          Queen Elizabeth could not just let him be King.If she abdicated it would be a major event requiring an act of parliament. Apart from that the people do not wanr the Queen to abdicate.

        • Jeanette says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 10:27 am

          Charles is not in the same league with Queen Elizabeth II, a person who has used wise and reasoned judgement for the benefit of her people through many trying times during the last many decades.

          Many people might not realize that at age 18, then Princess Elizabeth drove a truck (lorry, in British English) in the Women’s Auxiliary Territorial Service during WWII, after pestering her father for some time to allow her to do so.

          She is a living monument, and even though I am not British, I will hate it when she leaves us (the world).

        • Carolyne says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 6:26 pm

          Edward VIII abdicated to marry a twice divorced American. That is how the Queen’s father became King. He was the next oldest brother. If the Queen should abdicate, which she could if she wished, Charles, being the oldest son would succeed. The English law has changed to place the oldest child, son or daughter, of the sovereign as next in line to the throne. Since William’s oldest child is a son, it would have no effect on his succeeding his father.

          Many think that Edward VIII was forced to abdicate because he meddled in politics, in particular sympathizing openly with striking miners in Wales. England actually has no written Constitution.

          The Queen has no real power. Even when shew reads her address to the Opening of Parliament, not one word is her own. It was written for her by the ruling party. She must read it even if she were to disagree with it. Her power is limited to “Advise and warn.” But nothing more.

          My personal opinion is that Charles is an idiot.

        • gravenimage says

          Apr 2, 2017 at 2:02 am

          Yes–my aunt, who is 95, also drove supply trucks for the army during WWII as a young woman.

      • Cicero says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 6:28 am

        No Prince Charles is not living in fantasy land. He understands the sacredness to Muslims of the. Month of Ramadan. He knows that Islam is a religion of peace since that is what his Arab/Muslims fiends have led him to believe. Since he has deep financial ties with the Muslims in the Middle East he genuinely believes that’s the Muslims are overall of major benefit to non- Muslims in the rest of the world.

        Furthermore since he has his information on Islam from his Islamic friends he is unaware that’s they practice lying as a quintessential art. He is,also, totally unmotivated to read the actual Islamic Koran and Hadiths , preferring others to feed him the relevant knowledge.

        This means that HRH genuinely believes that the Muslim mindset is equivalent to the Christian mindset. He is tragically unaware of the true , mercilessand vicious nature of the ideology his friends espouse. He is demonstrating by his well intentioned intervention his compassion and empathy for the suffering Muslim communities in the Middle East.

        • Hector Archytas says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 6:52 am

          So, Prince Charles is a mahomedan blasphemor. Calling ramadan holy is blasphemous.

        • ECAW says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 7:12 am

          There you go then…living in fantasy land.

        • Jeanette says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 10:30 am

          So you are telling us that Charles APPROVES of raping babies, mutilating women, burning people alive in cages, crucifying small children, committing genocide, attacking innocent people, enslaving people?

          Like I said in a previous post, Charles is not in the same league as the Queen.

        • Carolyne says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 6:30 pm

          Charles likely approves of polygamy. He has since his late teens had a number of mistresses in addition to Camilla Parker-Bowles. One was an Australian, Dale, Lady Tryon who committed suicide by jumping out of a window of a mental institution where she was confined. He called her “Kanga.” Cute, isn’t it? He is a serial adulterer who should never become king.

    • Gordon Miller says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 2:11 pm

      In any case, the Prince looks like a jerk.

    • Chris in Texas says

      Apr 2, 2017 at 4:40 am

      Ramen …like the noodles ! I like it …from now on I’m going to call it the feast of ramen …?

  2. mortimer says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 8:57 pm

    Prince Charles did not know in his INSUFFICIENT STUDY OF ISLAM that RAMADAN is considered THE MONTH OF JIHAD.

    The greatest of Islamic victories over the dirty kufaar occurred in Ramadan.

    YOUR ROYAL HIGHNESS, I AM ADDRESSING YOU PERSONALLY:

    “RAMADAN IS THE MONTH OF JIHAD, SIR! REPEAT: RAMADAN IS THE MONTH OF JIHAD!”

    -over-

    • Karen says

      Mar 31, 2017 at 9:06 pm

      Interesting!

      • mortimer says

        Mar 31, 2017 at 9:15 pm

        Ramadan is considered the BEST time to launch a JIHAD ATTACK.

        • Keys says

          Mar 31, 2017 at 11:10 pm

          Yes, and as noted on this site during the past Ramadan, kafir attacks do increase. Also noted was that there is much over eating and indulgence when the sun goes down.

          Yes, Karen, interesting, as well as repulsive. Ramadan in 2017 will start on Saturday, the 27th of May and will continue for 30 days until Sunday, the 25th of June. Stay tuned to JW. Quite the contrast to Christian Lent, Holy Week, and Easter.

        • Keys says

          Mar 31, 2017 at 11:12 pm

          Prince Charles shames my generation.

        • mortimer says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 9:02 am

          Thank you, Keys, for the date. Western security should URGENTLY prepare for an INCREASE in JIHAD ACTIVITY after May 27, 2017.

          An act of jihad during Ramadan carries DOUBLE the reward.

          https://www.memri.org/reports/ramadan-%E2%80%93-month-spirituality-devotion-jihad-and-martyrdom

          Ramadan – The Month Of Spirituality, Devotion, Jihad And Martyrdom

    • underbed cat says

      Mar 31, 2017 at 11:42 pm

      So maybe he was right not to invade at that point since this is when they had the most previous victories.. but this is only hindsight since Osama was so protected…and as it turned out Afghanistan, now has sharia based leadership after many were lost. He ended up in Pakistan ….. The picture of Prince Charles now explains the problems Europe and Britian is facing….the information to know your enemy was also well hidden for years by a organization whose purpose is to do mislead and protect the ideology of the enemy, a well hidden enemy.

  3. Terry says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 9:12 pm

    I had read, at various times, that when Charles was married to Diana, she cheated on him.

    I can see why. He has (in my opinion) more than a few loose screws and a great many rocks (rather than brains) in his head.

    If he were an American, the Dems would run him for a high office, he is so far from reality.

    • mortimer says

      Mar 31, 2017 at 9:16 pm

      Charles is a very fine man.

      • Terry says

        Mar 31, 2017 at 9:21 pm

        Yes, I saw that in the picture of him in the Saville Row suit and the sword.

      • john spielman says

        Mar 31, 2017 at 9:33 pm

        I Hope that is said in jest as Charles is supposed to be the DEFENDER OF THE FAITH( Christian faith not that of the saracen!)

        • Kate says

          Mar 31, 2017 at 9:52 pm

          Prince Charles declared decades ago that, when he ascends the throne, he wants to be known, not as “Defender of the faith”, (which has been part of the coronation oath since Henry VIII split with Rome to divorce his first wife and marry Anne Boleyn) but as “Defender of FAITHS.”

        • jayell says

          Mar 31, 2017 at 11:21 pm

          He said that he wants to be the ‘Defender of FAITHS’ (with the ‘S’). That.sounds hopeful, doesn’t it? If he makes it to the Big Flashy Chair wearing the funny metal hat with all those jewels, he’d be a ‘Constitutional Monarch’; which means (according to the rules) that he just sits on the Chair, wears the hat, and does as he’s told. The trouble is, no one.bothered to write the rules down, no one’s really entitled to write any rules down, and (on paper) he legally still owns the lot, rather as if Buckingham Palace was Trump Tower and the rest of us weren’t even shareholders. So it’s obvious why quite a few people over here would like to get shot of the Big Flashy Chair and flog off the aforementioned metal.hat on EBay before HE has a chance to get anywhere near either of them, because he’s likely to want to write his own rules. Interesting situation!

        • Jenny H says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 7:10 am

          John Spielman,

          That’s what I was thinking. He wouldn’t be capable of being a Defender of the Faith with those ideas. I also don’t see how he could be effective as a monarch in advising or counselling the Government of the day about Islam and would be incapable of giving effective advice to counteract the jihad threat and help preserve his country’s future.

        • Leon Degney says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 7:38 am

          Charlie has said he has no intention to be “THE DEFENDER of the FAITH” if and when he aquires the throne.

    • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

      Mar 31, 2017 at 10:04 pm

      No: Charles rejected Diana, for the older ugly Camilla. Diana loved him, but finally she got fed up.

      And I was going to say, before I read your post, that Charles has a long history of being a fruitcake. I mean this is the guy who talked to flowers and has had any number of other idiotic ‘ideas’. And any man dumb enough to reject Diana is definitely stupid enough to come up with this insanity!

      I wasn’t a bit surprised when I read this-this is HRH all over.

      • gravenimage says

        Mar 31, 2017 at 10:26 pm

        Spot on, Kathy.

      • citycat says

        Mar 31, 2017 at 11:26 pm

        Kathy Brown

        I heard that Diana was a spoilt brat and was executed for treachery

        Just saying

        • Jeanette says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 11:29 am

          DIANA was a spoiled brat? But not, or course, Charles?

          Is that because he is royalty, or because he is male.

          One can hear anything these days, probably even that Diana was an ET. It doesn’t make it so.

        • citycat says

          Apr 2, 2017 at 12:54 am

          Jeannette

          No

          That was from people that knew Diana

          .

      • Zulu2 says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 12:48 pm

        Remember too that Charles said the war in Syria is caused by global warming. Yes, he was serious about that too.

    • Rick Ash says

      Mar 31, 2017 at 10:42 pm

      Terry,

      I like the way you think. The “Royals” live in an entirely different world than most of us!

      Thanks for your comment.

      Rick

    • Northern Virginiastan says

      Mar 31, 2017 at 10:49 pm

      Post-Charles, Diana fell in love with Hasnat Khan, a Pakistani cardiologist. Cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan said that he had mediated with Dr. Khan’s family concerning marriage with Diana. I’ve read, but can’t confirm that she began seeing Dodi Fayed in order to make Dr. Khan jealous. What a tawdry way to die.

      I love royal gossip, and I don’t think that Camilla is the witch that she’s made out to be. Having mistresses was an acceptable practice among royals. Camilla’s great-grandmother Alice Keppel was King Edward VII’s mistress.

      I think that Diana was a besotted young woman who grew up reading too much Barbara Cartland. Moreover, Lord Mountbatten advised Charles to find a woman without a past.

      • Terry says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 6:41 pm

        Northern V–

        I remember reading, that before Charles and Diana could be married, a “royal gynecologist” had to certify that she was a virgin.

        Around that time, I read about a Japanese doctor who had perfected a way to make it appear that a woman who had had her hymen torn, by having sex, could have it ( bad word, but best I can think of) repaired- to look intact.

        later, reading about Diana’s trysts (obviously, I never tried to confirm them- i wasn’t having sex with her)- like her instructor, etc-I wondered-she came from a family with money- had she had one of those? Nobody will ever know.

        • Caroline says

          Apr 3, 2017 at 1:02 pm

          That sounds very elaborate and most unlikely. They didn’t want a girl with a ‘past’ because former lovers may have come out of the woodwork to tell all. Diana was very young and naive when she fell in love with Charles and she didn’t have a past. The knowledge that her husband was in love with another woman was enough to unhinge an already fragile mind. Charles is a weak man and self- indulgent.

    • Anne Smith says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 1:27 pm

      Diana was a very stupid young woman, although she was treated badly. They did not look after her and after leaving Charles she hooked up with a Muslim doctor, apparently she was devoted to him.

      Then she went on holiday with a bunch of rackety Muslims and hey presto – end of Diana. Very sad, but she didn’t show a lot of nous.

    • jayell says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 4:29 pm

      Re. Charles & Diana. I don’t think either of them were quite in line for a Ph.D in Astrophysics, but both were known for domestic extracurricular activities. Diana’s last and chief ‘mentor’ in this respect was of course a muslim, and there are some who say that this had something to do with that unfortunate accident that she suffered.

      • Terry says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 6:24 pm

        I had read that long before the divorce, Diane was having an affair with her (either tennis or horseback riding) instructor, who was in the British military.

        The last one, the Egyptian, at least had some business sense (his family bought Harrod’s–which was originally started and run by Jews, or so i read; and when i wa sin England, sold beer and booze).

        But, what I don’t and never did understand about those who claim to be bothered by the “photographers” etc for the tabloids. How do these people know where the celebrities are? Or, are they publicity stunts-? I mean, one, maybe two, could come across a celebrity at a place, by chance. But numerous ones, at the same time, at the same place?

        Seems unlikely to be all chance.

        • Northern Virginiastan says

          Apr 2, 2017 at 8:54 pm

          There was a story going around that Dodi Fayed let the paparazzi know about their comings and goings.

    • Carolyne says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 6:35 pm

      Yes, after Diana discovered that Charles was still bonking Camilla, she had several lovers. One of whom, James Gilbey, is rumored to be Harry’s father. In fact, Harry looks just like him. When she died, she had broken up with a Pakistani Heart Surgeon in London and was trying to make him jealous with Dodi Fayed.

      IMO Charles was the cause of her death by his treatment of her.

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Apr 2, 2017 at 2:18 am

        Yes, Harry got so fed up with all the public rumors and speculation, that he demanded to have a DNA test to prove Charles was his father.

        Then the Queen stepped in and said, “Absolutely not. There will be no DNA test, and there will be no more word on the subject.”

        I think the Queen had a strong feeling about the truth.

        That all said, I have tremendous respect for Harry. The man is a British Infantry Officer, and wanted to go to the front lines in Afghanistan, which he did. But word leaked out to the bad guys, and Harry became target #1. That’s when the British exfiltrated him, against his strong protests. He wanted to stay with his men. Harry has a huge set of balls, which is more than we can say for Charles.

        William is a British Military Officer too. They never let him see action though due to his accession, even though he wanted it. He instead was a Search and Rescue (SAR) helicopter pilot, which is a job requiring huge balls in and of itself, whether or not in combat.

        • Caroline says

          Apr 3, 2017 at 1:07 pm

          I don’t believe rumours that Charles is not Harrys father. Harry looks like Charles, especially his eyes. The red hair comes from Diana’s side if the family.

  4. Stan Lee says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 9:57 pm

    Charles has been an “Arabist” longer than we know. Most likely his favorite British person has been T.E. Lawrence AKA Lawrence of Arabia. The story was most likely a romantic adventure for Lawrence, who saw the primitive Arab tribes of the World War 1 period and their war against the Ottoman Empire as a people fighting for their freedom. which obviously Charles took up as one who must have envisioned himself in the “Lawrence” role.

    .That the Arabs also schemed against each other as one tribe vs. another was the other part of the story, and where Lawrence came in with his dream of uniting the tribes. For a short time, those tribes fought alongside each other, but never to unite with each other.

    • Peggy says

      Apr 3, 2017 at 9:52 pm

      I think it’s worse than that. Charles wanted to be Camilla’s tampon. Inbreeding will totally rot a brain.

      http://www.smh.com.au/world/the-original-hack-20110730-1i5k4.html

  5. gravenimage says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 10:24 pm

    Prince Charles tried to halt Afghan invasion to “honor Ramadan”
    ………………….

    What a dhimmi tool. Does he have any idea what Ramadan actually commemorates?

  6. ElderlyZionist says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 10:30 pm

    ‘But Americans can do anything!’

    OhMiGawd. Did he *say* that?

  7. Rita says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 10:34 pm

    Once a tampon, always a tampon !

    • TrueToo says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 4:39 am

      So true. I’m wondering if that’s a gold-plated erection he has rising from his lap – probably induced by fantasising about being reincarnated as a tampon.

    • Carolyne says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 6:39 pm

      And he actually should be going ’round and ’round in a toilet as he once said to Camilla Parker Bowles in a recorded telephone conversation. You know, the one where he said he would like to live in her trousers.

      • ploome says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 7:53 pm

        a tampon does not live in trousers

  8. David, Thailand says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 11:03 pm

    Long Live the Queen.

    How did such a wonderful person manage to spawn a certifiable moron?

  9. JayT says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 11:15 pm

    No wonder Princess Diana was desperate to escape from him. Every time he takes the pacifier out of his mouth and speaks …

    • Peggy says

      Apr 3, 2017 at 9:56 pm

      Yes, but where was she escaping to?
      One Muslim wasn’t enough, she had to go for another one.
      She made some very bad choices.

  10. citycat says

    Mar 31, 2017 at 11:56 pm

    Maybe Charles was just being light hearted with the Americans

    And Charles just needs to go on a comedy course

    Easy to be flipped out with loads of dosh

    Maybe he was applying the law of ridicule to separate from the heaviness of the twin towers

    .

  11. Guest says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 12:02 am

    Our presence in Afghanistan makes it better

  12. Dry Academy says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 12:53 am

    This goofball has not, as far as I am aware, uttered a single word of protest against the mass Islamic grooming gang rapes of English girls that occurred during his tenure as Prince of Wales, or expressed any commiseration with the victims. Yet he wants to show “respect” for the stupid religious beliefs of the savages who committed them. He is unworthy of the title he holds, and a disgrace to the English nation.

    • ECAW says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 3:08 am

      Can we make that British please?

  13. PKG says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 1:40 am

    As he lives in a rarified world of kings, queens and castles, maybe he is slightly more prone than others of being a tad out of touch with reality….Douglas Murray wrote a brilliant book about him and others who are similarly infected by a syndrome called “Islamophilia”…..

    • Gwenie Mugliston says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 6:44 am

      Islamophilia…I have been accused of not knowing what that word means. Ridiculous.

      It is time for us to start calling a spade a spade and calling the media, msm, media what they and every damned politician who would have us be pacific toward the Islamists what they are, that is “islamophilists”.

      If we do achieve that one word choice, we may begin to get this mess in the USA sorted out. Otherwise we who object to mass non-vetted immigration are doomed and we, too, will become “.Islamophilists” as Sharia Law is imposed on us all.

      There can be no capitulation as we see from the invasion all over the world of the mindset that is Islamophilia.

      • Carolyne says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 6:43 pm

        Love your comments, Gwenie.

  14. Steven RSA says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 2:10 am

    I can just picture Sadat requesting that the Yom Kippur war not start on that day to honour Yom Kippur.

    • Lia Wissing says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 3:18 am

      Well said, Sir!

    • TrueToo says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 4:38 am

      Charles probably thinks it was just coincidence that Egypt attacked Israel on the holiest day of Jewish religious observance.

      That’s precisely how dumb and uninformed he is.

      • Peggy says

        Apr 3, 2017 at 10:01 pm

        Easter is coming so how many churches and monasteries are going to be safe?
        Muslims are known to attack on Christmas and Easter in the Balkans. They just might do the same for the rest of the world.

    • Terry says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 6:48 pm

      The Yom Kippur war was started that day FOR THAT REASON- JEWS WOULD BE PRAYING.

      A BIG, NO MAKE THAT, HUGE, MISTAKE.

      The roads were cleared; and the military knew where ALL of the military and reservists were.

      it was easy for israel to mobilize.

      WHERE ISRAEL WAS WRONG- THEY HAD INTELLIGENCE THAT THE ARABS WERE PREPARING FOR WAR, AND DID NOT TO A PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE. GOLDA MEIR WAS AFRAID OF ‘ WORLD OPINION”.

      As if the world or the Useless effing nations gives a damn about israel.

  15. yoga guru demon baur from underworld says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 3:41 am

    Boss,
    Everything is ready for the arrival of Islams Mahdi to fulfill prophecy and judgement of Muslims. Mahdi may be Maha lady, Maha id, Maha guest etc. If Muslims are not satisfied then on the spot we can bring Mahdi(a big slap).

  16. stefanie sleep says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 4:11 am

    Poor old Charlie Boy is as nutty as a fruitcake! always was, always will be, he has to be, choosing the old trollop over, dearest, loveliest Diana. Gawd help us if he ever becomes King! Bring on King William, a boy after this mother’s own heart. Not going to happen though i am afeared.

  17. Dacritic says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 4:38 am

    The whole British royal family is a waste of space anyway. The monarchy should be obliterated and those blood suckers be made to live like every other Brit.

    Now that Islam is so deeply embedded on British shores bringing with it all its problems and what is the…”queen” saying?

    Nada. Zip. Zilch.

    You gotta be kidding me. You’re the Queen for crissakes.

    Not a single poop.

    “We don’t like Islam, it is against British culture and I don’t want it in my land!”

    That should shut Theresa May up effectively.

    The Muslims might want to consider driving a car bomb into Buckingham Palace or to wherever these royal cowards are hiding.

    • ECAW says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 4:55 am

      Scarcely cowards. They are at risk of terrorist attacks wherever they go, just as they were from the IRA. Joe Bloggs has taken the brunt so far but a really determined suicide attack would be hard to stop, as I’m sure they know.

      They’re good for tourism too.

    • Carolyne says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 6:45 pm

      The Queen is not allowed to meddle in politics. She is reported to have said at a private dinner party that she saw no benefit in the EU. If she could speak, I would love to know what she would say.

  18. Ethel Red The Unready says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 4:44 am

    Its the expression on his face that slays me. I read (Oh I hope Mummy can see me now) what a dope, and I had forgotten about his desire to be the Rottweilers tampon. He also looks like he would really enjoy being strapped down and having the soldiers that raped Lawrence in the movie work on his ugly ass.

  19. Dominic says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 4:45 am

    The invasion was based on a lie, so that was wrong. And Charles is a sell out to Christians and the UK. He sold out to Islam, not only property so they could build Mosques in the UK, but also sold out the UK to the EU Zone, which is fully controlled by Saudi Arabia and Germany Alliance dating back to WWII, which allowed a despotic Murdering Sharia Law Islamic Empire to invade the UK through EU Zone open borders. He allowed the entire British Government to Collapse and hand over their Government Jobs to Brussels the surrogate control center of Islam for Saudi Arabia and Germany. What is even worse he sold out his dear wife Lady Diana, who was caught in the Web of Islam he allowed to take over, where she died in a Car Crash, where she previously revealed in a letter her husband was sabotaging the car to kill her. Everyone thinks she was referring to Charles but he was not her husband then. It was Dodie. Charles cheated on Diana, that led her into the Islamic World Charles supported and created in the UK. Essentially he did kill her, by his naive Islam acts on another level. If I remember right there was a previous King of Britain named Charles who had his head removed for betrayal. Charles really needs to correct his mistakes, and repent for God’s intervention and forgiveness. Seriously.

    • Joy Greggo says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 5:47 am

      He should remember what happened to the first King Charles for treasonous acts against his own people. Hopefully, Elizabeth will outlive him. The British Jerry Brown?

  20. Dominic says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 4:48 am

    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/who-created-eu-zone-hitler-islam-dominic-jermano

  21. Infidel Lass says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 5:29 am

    This is precisely why the majority of Brits prefer Charles would stand down from the throne when the Queen dies, and pass the throne directly to his son William. https://www.google.fr/amp/s/www.express.co.uk/news/royal/704340/sorry-Charles-oll-shows-more-than-half-Brits-want-Prince-William-take-throne/amp

    The British ruler is the head of the Church of England. Gives me shivers to think what he’d do with our Church as he’d have full powers to whore the kingdom out to Islam.

  22. Richard Paulsen says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 5:51 am

    When will the arab countries look after their own countries instead of fighting eachother and others and forcing themselves on others?
    All the time before and since 600 it has gone on. Shia against sunni, sunni against sunni and all the other mess.Others should not have to pay as is the case today.

    • Leon Degney says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 7:55 am

      Richard, the West has contributed heavily to the woes of the Middle East. I do agree though, that they are their own worst enemy in many cases.

      • Richard Paulsen says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 10:48 am

        Lots of trouble there. Hopefully things will change to the better.

      • Jeanette says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 12:07 pm

        Right – it was the West that told the Muslims to kill everyone else. And it is the West that supports crucifying small children, mutilating women, burning people alive in cages, raping babies as young as one year old.

        Although many LIBERALS in the West support the behavior of the Muslims, the decent people don’t. It was the Muslims’ very own, much-regaled Mohammed that trained the Muslims to be monsters, not the people of the West.

        I refuse to take even one drop of blame for what the Muslims do. I resent having to pay even ONE PENNY to support anything for them, including helping to support the litters of children that they often produce to drop on the taxpayers of western countries.

        Further, if the liberals were forced to pay everything that goes to Muslims (since the liberals are the only people who support the monsters), support of the Muslims would drop sharply.

        • Carolyne says

          Apr 1, 2017 at 7:00 pm

          (Applause) for Jeannette.

    • carol says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 10:52 pm

      Richard Paulsen: “All the time before and since 600 it has gone on. Shia against sunni, sunni against sunni and all the other mess.Others should not have to pay as is the case today.
      —–
      You’ll probably find the comments of Sandra Solomon interesting on this subject. Watch from about 7:50 on:

  23. Mark says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 6:03 am

    Just think, one day he could be head of the Church of England

    • Leon Degney says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 7:57 am

      Charlie has stated that he has no intention of being “The Defender of the Faith” therefore it is highly unlikely he will be crowned. He may be “crowned” in other ways though.

      • ploome says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 7:46 pm

        he want to be ‘defender of faiths’..faiths, not ‘The Faith’

        easier to do from Mecca

        (if you know what I mean)

  24. Pal says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 6:06 am

    Nidal Hassan (meaning “Struggle” “Beautiful”), Fort Hood shooter, says he’s going on ‘hunger strike’:
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/31/fort-hood-shooter-says-hes-going-on-hunger-strike.html

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 12:09 pm

      Good. Let’s hope it turns out to be fatal.

      Just wish he had done it before the American TaxVictims were forced to support him for so long.

      • Pal says

        Apr 1, 2017 at 12:57 pm

        He mass-murdered in the name of enemy ideology in order to be fed for free and for years by its damaged enemy…

    • Carolyne says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 7:21 pm

      Anne is married to Timothy Lawrence, a military officer who has risen astronomically in the military since his marriage. She was having an affair with him while married to her first husband and her love letters were stolen and offered to an English tabloid but they refused them. The Queen allowed her to divorce her first husband and she was married in Scotland to her second, because the Church of England doesn’t allow divorced people to remarry.

  25. Graham says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 6:21 am

    For some reason, when I saw that photo, I just got the image of Charles sat in a deckchair on Blackpool beach commanding the tide not to come in!

    • jayell says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 4:35 pm

      Now, that could have been convincing at Southend. (The rise goes out a mile).

  26. Graham says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 6:22 am

    It’s fitting that that photo was posted on 1st April!

  27. Halal Bacon says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 6:25 am

    Well the Sunni and Shiite used to stop fighting when Benny Hill was on, so you know it only makes sense

  28. Troybeam says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 8:26 am

    It’s a crap shoot on who dies first, Queen or Charles, On Diana, no one is perfect however I will honor this woman for the way she brought up her sons, she rejected the royal coldness that Charles was brought up in and gave her sons a dose of reality that real people live in, she put the children first and mainly Diana showed the world she was a Mother first above all else, As for Charles he’s a product of the old royal school of not seen or heard unless needed which explains somewhat of his erratic behavior all his life, in other words a spoiled brat even to this day. Charles is not fit to wear the crown, never will be.

    • Myrtle says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 10:09 am

      I think the queen has already named her grandson to succeed her, therefore she must agree with you!!!

    • Shmooviyet says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 10:44 am

      Agreed.
      Diana had only her sons and did her best for them as she did not want them growing into men that would behave as the one she married. Charles was quite the celebrated baby; he couldn’t agree more with his own ‘extra-specialness’.
      Lord M. would have given up on the Prince long ago.

  29. God Almighty says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 9:51 am

    Born a pudding head, he will die a pudding head.

  30. Florida Jim says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 10:40 am

    Prince Charles is about as sharp as Michael Moore. Why do the English even allow these rich frauds to live in England put them on some Newfoundland island.Brixit should insist upon this to improve England.

  31. Hummer says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 10:50 am

    Hope the Queen does not relinquish to this idiot and I keep hoping against hope Harry is put in though he would have to defer to William. Prince Harry has the stomach for war if necessary and likes it-that’s what they need to inspire the UK if they are going to continue to have royalty.

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 12:10 pm

      I agree.

      Live long, Queen Elizabeth!

    • Daniel Triplett says

      Apr 2, 2017 at 2:31 am

      Agreed about Harry. The man is a war fighter for whom I have tremendous respect.

      Keep in mind though, William is also a Military Officer and trained Search and Rescue helicopter pilot. If you know much about combat ops, SAR pilots have enormous balls, and see a whole lot of action.

      William wanted front line action, but they wouldn’t let him due to his accession.

  32. Mahendra Singh says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 12:13 pm

    How about adding a beard ( but no moustache) to the make-up ? As of now he looks like a cartoon character.

  33. Bosch Fawstin says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 12:24 pm

    My Prince Charles as Mohammad cartoon http://fawstin.blogspot.com/2016/12/prince-charles-urges-brits-to-think-of.html

    • carol says

      Apr 2, 2017 at 12:04 am

      Bosch…I recognized your name and am borrowing one of your quotes:
      “That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.” -P.C. Hodgell

      Although it’s off-topic from Prince Charles I’d like to add your most interesting 2014 interview with Jamie Glazov and I hope you don’t mind. We need to hear from insiders:
      The Glazov Gang-Bosch Fawstin on “The Infidel, Featuring Pigman.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=Pgxi3sExLrM&app=desktop

  34. BLC says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 12:44 pm

    Prince Charles, the dolt.

  35. birchstick says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 1:37 pm

    This guy is nothing but a retard. With any luck he’ll kick the bucket before his mom so we don’t have to tolerate a “Sofa King”. ( He is a sofa king. Sofa King we todd did.)

  36. John A. Marre says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 2:13 pm

    He will do whatever it takes to hold on to power. Christians are fading away, and most don’t believe in anything anyway. So he’s looking to the rising tide of Muslims to assure that he and his family stays in power for as long as possible.
    So what if the Muslims will eliminate his family, in much the same way as the French rid themselves of their monarchy? Immediate power is worth any price that has to be paid later.
    When does he have St George’s Cross removed from the UK flag?

  37. tony46 says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 2:48 pm

    HH Dhimmi.
    .

  38. Rob says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 4:08 pm

    Having, for decades, observed the antics of loony “Prince” Charles, I can only hope that Queen Elisabeth tends toward immortality.

  39. jewdog says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 4:14 pm

    People who dress as he’s shown there generally say “Trick or treat?”.

    • Terry says

      Apr 1, 2017 at 6:17 pm

      I don’t think that “trick or treat” is done in Europe (and Britain).

      I recall, some decades back, i was with a firm that did a lot of business in Switzerland, and around Halloween ( this was before email and faxes) using telex MACHINES ( SIMILAR TO A CROSS BETWEEN EMAIL AND TEXTS AND FAXES) my co-worker and I asked them about this. We were told (via the machine) that there was no such custom in Switzerland, and, as far as they knew, in western Europe.

      otherwise, i agree with you

      • carol says

        Apr 2, 2017 at 12:27 am

        No, you’re wrong Terry. At least in Ireland Halloween is celebrated in numerous ways (snap apple is one of the favourites):
        http://www.irishcentral.com/roots/top-ten-irish-traditions-for-halloween-see-photos-105754748-237724251

  40. solange silverman says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 5:50 pm

    The “royal family” are notorious antisemites, so I am going to say yes. Yes, he would probably have honored Hitler’s birthday in that way.

  41. ploome says

    Apr 1, 2017 at 7:24 pm

    The Kings and Queens of England have always been ‘Defender of the Faith’, but Charles has said he will be ‘defender of faiths’….

    and of course the rumor that he has converted to Islam

  42. Daniel Triplett says

    Apr 2, 2017 at 2:34 am

    Skip Chuck and put Wills on the throne.

    Wills and Kate would be outstanding for tourism too.

    William and Harry are both war fighters.

  43. Ric says

    Apr 2, 2017 at 11:33 am

    Prince Chuck has always been delusional, lost between his elitist boyhood and latent adulthood. God forbid the Royal Family, the entire UK when he becomes the King. Charles has always been enraptured by the religion of peace… the cult of bloodletting. It is rumored, he is a closet Muslim which, of course, would not shock and awe me or most with an inkling of this aspirant King’s madness. One can only hope, perhaps pray that Her Majesty outlives this certifiable Royal nutter. God Save the Queen, God Save us all.

  44. PRCS says

    Jun 23, 2017 at 2:12 pm

    C:\Users\Bob\Desktop\Test.docx

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Apathy Rules the World on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • tim gallagher on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Keith O on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Mount Zion on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • James Lincoln on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.