• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK: Terror attacks have tripled in 5 years, London’s Muslim mayor bringing in 1,500,000 more migrants

Mar 5, 2017 8:25 am By Robert Spencer

What could possibly go wrong? Only racist, bigoted Islamophobes could possibly object, right?

“Terrorism in the UK more than trebles in five years with 10 per cent of offenders coming from just five wards in Birmingham, survey reveals,” Mail Online, March 5, 2017:

A major new study has revealed terror attacks in the UK have more than tripled in the last five years.

The shocking report also reveals that Islamist-related offences have doubled in the last five years, while the rate of beheadings and stabbings has increased eleven-fold.

London and Birmingham have been identified as housing the most offenders, with East London home to half of London-based offenders (22 per cent overall), the most common boroughs being Tower Hamlets, Newham and Waltham Forest.

The study identifies all Islamism-inspired terrorism convictions and suicide attacks in the UK between 1998 and 2015.

The 1,000-page report, published by the Hannah Stuart and the Henry Jackson Society, says Islamism-inspired terrorism remains the principal terrorism threat to both the United Kingdom and British interests overseas.

London was the place of residence at the time of arrest in 43 per cent of Islamism-related offences.

The second most common region was the West Midlands, with 18 per cent of arrests – 14 per cent of which came from Birmingham.

The report claims: ‘Offenders lived in neighbourhoods with both a higher than average relative deprivation and Muslim population.’

According to the society, there were 264 convictions between 1998 and 2015 involving 253 British or foreign nationals.

And the role of women in Islamism-inspired terrorism has trebled – from four per cent in the years 1998-2010, to 11 per cent in 2011-2015.

Some 72 per cent of those committing offences are British nationals, 47 per cent are in full time work or education and 76 per cent have been known to the authorities….

“Sadiq Khan boasts of 1.5 million new people to capital as he reveals shock ‘London Plan,'” by Siobhan McFadyen, Express, March 4, 2017:

SADIQ Khan made an astonishing admission that his administration is preparing for 1.5 million new people to move to London.

During an event in Surrey, the Mayor of London, 46, was challenged by a member of the public to come clean over his plans to make the over populated city’s air cleaner.

But in his response he has admitted for the first time that the UK’s capital will see an influx of as many as another 1.5 million people.

More than five million people have moved to Britain in 10 years with immigration figures showing that more than 66 million people live in the country.

However there are a number of estimates that say the figures are much higher.

Mr Khan told hundreds of people in the audience: “Going forward we don’t allow London to have worse air than is currently and worse pollution.

“And so there is a couple of big things, that I wouldn’t mind your input.

“One is we are publishing an environment strategy and we need your input into making sure we fulfil my ambition for London to be the greatest city in the world.

“You better remember that our population is rising, it is currently 8.5m, by 2020 it will be 9 million by 2030 it will be 10 million….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, immigration, United Kingdom Tagged With: Sadiq Khan


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Mac-101 says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 8:32 am

    It just goes to show you that the Libs Global Warming and environment concerns are just BS. Any farmer will tell you the more of a population of any critter you put on a given area, the more pollution and cost both increase exponentially. It must be Satan’s plan to destroy every vestige of Western Civilization so THEY can install Satan’s Beast at the head of THEIR Global NWO!

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 11:09 am

      Satan very likely being the same entity as the one called “Allah.”

      • Dacritic says

        Mar 6, 2017 at 9:45 pm

        Or the puppeteer behind it.

    • patriotliz says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 8:37 pm

      For where two or three or 10…100…1000…or more… are gathered together in the name of Allah, there is Satan in the midst of them…the destroyer of God’s creation.
      https://youtu.be/WIojqsHBWko

    • Charles Martel says

      Mar 7, 2017 at 12:04 am

      A MUSLIM mayor wants to bring in more Muslims? Big Surprise! EVERYTHING about the unarmed invading army is a LIE (the Crusades aren’t over….and Christian Europe is being conquered from within!). These aren’t REFUGEES…they are INVADERS!

      • Lioness says

        Mar 7, 2017 at 10:13 am

        The whole idea of any muslim politician is to bring in more of their brethrens and ultimately islamize the west. Khan is doing exactly what is expected of him.

  2. mortimer says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 8:42 am

    Well-meaning, ill-informed, virtue-signalling Libtardians voted for Khan with exactly that attitude: “WHAT COULD GO WRONG?”

    They failed to ask the IMPORTANT three questions: 1) “WHAT IS IT THAT A SUPREMACIST WANTS?” 2) HOW FAR IS A SUPREMACIST PREPARED TO GO TO GET SUPREMACISM? 3) HOW MUCH OF A SUPREMACIST IS KHAN?

    Answers: 1) a supremacists wants SUPREMACY for his own group 2) a supremacist will do everything possible to manipulate or exploit the rules, even thwarting the rules and destroying the rule of law to get his way 3) Khan is an Islamic supremacist who wants to impose Sharia law over Britain and will use a gradual ‘soft jihad’ approach until UK becomes a carbon copy of Pakistan.

    • Catherine says

      Mar 5, 2017 at 7:28 pm

      London is 50% Muslim. Of course they voted for Khan. They all have the same goal!

      • Itinerant says

        Mar 6, 2017 at 2:35 pm

        In the 2011 census Office for National Statistics, the proportion of Muslims in London was 12.4%
        The Telegraph reports
        “The highest percentage of Muslims is East London’s Tower Hamlets, with 45.6 per cent while neighbouring Newham has 40.8 per cent………Across the country there are now 3,114,992 Muslims with 1,554022 born overseas and they now make up 5.4% of the population of England and Wales.”
        http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/12132641/Number-of-UK-Muslims-exceeds-three-million-for-first-time.html

        Illegal immigration and people not on the census, will likely mean some of these figures are underestimates- it is demographics however, that make for grim reading but no need for fabrication- it’s nowhere near 50%…….not yet anyway.
        The unvarnished truth is hard enough to get out there at the moment. without figures plucked from the ether.

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 11:12 am

      The British elite arranged the Muslim invasion of Britain, and when there were enough Muslims there, they were able to vote one of their own into office.

      This is a replacement of western (white) civilization. It could only have happened after decades of schools being controlled by liberal, Marxist, Muslim-lovers.

  3. Pam Stein says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 9:01 am

    That’s exactly what’s happening throughout the west including the US. Apparently #Brexit and the election of Trump has had little impact on the agenda of the communist party -the liberal left. They’ve partnered with Islamist to gain control and then the freedom loving west communist. They think that once they gain power politically they won’t need the Islamist any longer, they’ll cast them aside.
    Their thinking is seriously skewed. Who’s using who? The liberal left is in for a rude awakening. If the people of Britain themselves don’t rise up RIGHT NOW before another 1.5M move into London you may not hold Britain. Pick up sticks, rocks, torches and pitchforks and go to war with your own power structure AND these Islamic idiots. If YOU don’t do it your daughters will be wrapped from head to toe in a sheet.

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 11:14 am

      And mutilated, a’ la Muslim Army of Charles Mansons.

  4. Crusades Were Right! says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 9:09 am

    Soon London will be as great a city as…

    …Cairo, Istanbul or Dhaka!

    Yay!

    ; ¬)

  5. Crusades Were Right! says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 9:38 am

    Well done, Londoners! You elected an Islamist for your Mayor!

    Your right-on friends will think you’re SO anti-racist…

    …and your children’s children will curse you.

    Glad to see you’ve got your priorities right.

  6. Troybeam says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 9:52 am

    We here in America need to look towards Europe and see all that is wrong with populating the world with Islamic refugees or a better name would be cultural warriors sent into a host nation to destroy the culture and people by violence and destruction.

    No matter what your Muslim neighbor says Islam has one goal, lie, cheat and steel a nations identity by any means possible and that includes invading government much like England and begin to have sharia law implemented in small ways at first than on a larger scale as the government is filled with nation born Muslims aka wolf in sheep clothing.

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 11:15 am

      The best name is Pamela Geller’s: The Army of Charles Mansons.

  7. underbed cat says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 12:18 pm

    The election of a London muslim mayor was the combined accomplishment of many elements. The absolute success of the deception and silencing of leaders, combined with total disregard of the sura’s of and the adamant explanation by muslim leaders as to the root of islam’s use of terror. It is not radical, as they want the public to believe it is directly tied to sharia laws that enforce the verses or commands to slay unbelievers found in the doctrine. But it takes quite an effort, and they were slowly working to publish books praising the doctrine in unrealistic terms, calming the public if they had any exposure to the terror that is used in the middle east. Being called a racist takes on new meaning as it really is a term to stop anyone from speaking the truth about sharia or the verses. So now they have a soft spoken pious leader to enforce the sharia slander laws, so the public will remain silent under fear of being a criminally charged, to speak about the knowledge that Winston Churchill knew about the enemy…very clever and catastrophic.

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 11:19 am

      Our forefathers had to take their lives in their hands and the Brits are going to have to do so now.

      There aren’t enough jail cells to hold millions of Brits, but if they don’t do something soon, they will be living in a jail called “Great Britain” – until the Muslims change it to another name in hideous, gutteral Arabic.

  8. jayell says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 12:47 pm

    Khan…….“One is we are publishing an environment strategy and we need your input into making sure we fulfil my ambition for London to be the greatest city in the world.”

    ‘His’ ambition, is it? Really?

    London has been in existence at least since the Roman Empire. Dr Samuel Johnson thought that London was more than a little unique well over 2 centuries ago, and many others have had similar opinions before and since then. At the height of the British Empire (over 100 years ago), London was being described as ‘the greatest city on earth’. I recall it as a very nice place to be 50 or 60 years ago, and that was even when there were still bomb sites all over the place and things were still rundown after WW2 . Something tells me that all these accolades were achieved without any help whatsoever from the likes of Khan and his motley crew, so why this obnoxious, swaggering alien impostor thinks that he’s going to create something that the proper British already created ages ago, defeats me.

    I’m afraid that, if anything, the opposite is now true. Social and crime statistics and recorded general impressions from various sources suggest that the legacy of Khan and his ilk has led to a marked deterioration in the general qualities of London, evidenced by the speed at which tradional Londoners of up to many centuries’ standing have done their best to escape the place in recent years. The Chinese tourist industry, whilst strongly recommending London as a venue for their increasing clientele, warned about many no-go areas that have come into existence for reasons that the likes of Khan should understand very well (we never had quite THAT sort of thing before!!(). And things don’t look like they’re getting any better. Yet the Great Khan is going to make things great, even though we’ve already been there before, but much, much better?

    Well, I never voted Kahn in.

  9. Angemon says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 2:19 pm

    Some 72 per cent of those committing offences are British nationals

    And 28% – almost a third – are non-British nationals – i.e., foreigners. What’s the percentage of foreigners in the overall population? If it’s 28%, then it’s distributed as expected. If it’s larger than 28%, then they’re under-represent, and that’s a good thing. If, however, it’s less than 28%, then they’re overrepresented, and you have a problem in your hands – foreigners are more terrorism prone than nationals, thus justifying stricter immigration laws. This, of course, assuming that “non-British nationals” are an homogeneous group, which they aren’t. I bet that if one were to break out the details of “non-British nationals”, you’d find many from third-world, majority-muslim countries and little from, for example, Western Europe or America.

    “You better remember that our population is rising, it is currently 8.5m, by 2020 it will be 9 million by 2030 it will be 10 million….

    Maybe I’m missing something here, but where’s he saying that the 1.5M extra people on London over the next 13 years are going to be “refugees”/”migrants”?

  10. Phil Copson says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 2:26 pm

    Quote: ” ‘Offenders lived in neighbourhoods with both a higher than average relative deprivation and Muslim population.’…….

    Deprived ? Deprived, you say ??? Compared to living in a shanty-town in Kashmir, they’re rolling in it !

    If they felt “deprived” they’d go home, wouldn’t they ?

    No, my report-writing friend, these people aren’t so much “deprived” as utterly depraved…..

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 11:21 am

      How could they be deprived, when they only have to spread their resources around ten or twenty children?

  11. John A. Marre says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 4:11 pm

    From what I can see, Britain is lost to the civilized world. There is no stopping the expansion, once they are established. You can be sure that Britain will rush to see how fast it can accommodate their new guests, especially in the matter of allowing them to have four wives so they can multiply rapidly.

  12. Wellington says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 8:35 pm

    Britain is in such a sorry-ass state, due in part to Muslim immigration, 1960s nonsense pushed into future decades a not insignificant factor either, whereby British culture has been mocked to death by Brits to a point which has become both tedious and suicidal. Enough already of Monty Python and a destructive film like The Ruling Class. Initially such parodies were humorous but they can now be seen, in hindsight, for the monumental calamities which they were.

    And where has the monarchy been in all this demise? Why, it’s been located in Absentville—-protecting its own “turf” and nothing more. What the hell is any office good for if you can’t put said office on the line from time to time? The closest the Queen ever reached such a “state” was to publicly criticize Margaret Thatcher, easily the greatest Prime Minister, whatever her faults, since Winston Churchill. Speaks volumes about the Queen and her skewed priorities.

    The Queen, a woman I used to respect but do no longer, has gone along with the ongoing destruction of her nation with nary a word opposing such destruction. Then there is that monumental fool, one Prince Charles, who not only has been silent while his nation is in dying mode but who has actually been in the forefront of defending the worst religion ever created by man——–Islam.

    Oh yeah, the UK is in deep shit. Very deep feces. Probably not extractable shit but I do very much hope I am wrong here. Wanna’ be. But the present Mayor of London does not inspire confidence in this regard, to put it mildly. Quite to the contrary, the bastard only proves my overall assessment here. And, even worse, this Muzzie has allies, for instance the last four Prime Ministers——Blair, Brown, Cameron and Sharia May.

    Not lookin’ good for Britannia, though the Brexit vote last June was inspiring. Much more “inspiration” needed. Soon like.

    • Rufolino says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 3:41 am

      Fact. It is constitutionally impossible for HM the Queen to take a partisan stand on such issues. No matter what her private views are (we can guess !) she is condemned always to go with the flow of governmental decisions, good and bad. To survive, the Queen must be above politics.

      Sometimes there are incidences in which the Queen’s opinions are revealed, but they are only revealed obliquely. The Queen never publicly criticised Mrs.Thatcher, the idea is preposterous given the Queen’s acute attention to her constitutional position. The most one can say on this point is that the Queen’s private view of some of Mrs.Thatcher’s policies was (unfortunately) leaked by a member of her staff who should have known better.

      • Anne Smith says

        Mar 6, 2017 at 5:19 am

        The Queen made a point of attending Mrs Thatcher’s funeral, very publicly and against the wishes of many politicians. This clearly demonstrated her support of Mrs Thatcher.

        Immigration policies are not within the remit of the London Mayor, however much Khan wishes they were. They are the province of the Government of the day, not the Mayor.

        • Wellington says

          Mar 6, 2017 at 11:58 am

          I am aware of the constitutional stricture you mentioned but the Queen’s nation is in huge trouble. It may even be dying. Time to put the office on the line. Way overdue. As LBJ said, what good is an office if you can never put it on the line.

        • Wellington says

          Mar 6, 2017 at 12:04 pm

          My 11:58 A.M. post was meant for Rufolino.

          Now I am directing my comment to Anne. It is this: I remember very clearly that the Queen and Mrs. Thatcher had a rather public disagreement on how to handle the apartheid question in South Africa. The details I have forgotten but it was very well known that these two women did not see eye to eye on how to “engage” South Africa. As for the Queen attending Thatcher’s funeral, I don’t believe the monarch, strictly constitutionally speaking, would not be able on their own initiative to attend the funeral of any Prime Minister.

      • Jeanette says

        Mar 6, 2017 at 11:24 am

        The Queen WON’T survive (except possibly in well-funded exile) if the British don’t stop the takeover of GB by the Muslims.

        Does anyone think they won’t behead her or burn her alive, as they have so flagrantly done to thousands of other people?

  13. davej says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 8:54 pm

    Deprived or depraved?

    Depraved, by a long margin.

  14. Eric Jones says

    Mar 5, 2017 at 9:34 pm

    The sooner Article 50 is invoked the sooner Britain can get control of its borders without EU interference.. This should stem the inflow of muslim immigrants.

    In the mean time is there any serious political movement or candidates that can defeat Khan in the next election? Is any likely to develope?

    Eric

    • catherine says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 1:25 pm

      paul golding on facebook as Britain First they are a good group

  15. brane pilot says

    Mar 6, 2017 at 2:12 am

    Climate change is driven by global human overpopulation.
    But no one will even mention the word overpopulation.
    It is an unbreakable, multicultural taboo.
    Growth until collapse and catastrophe is the official dogma and agenda. Everywhere.
    The last person to grab a fistfull of dollars before it all comes crashing down, wins.
    Trump is right.
    Climate catastrophe is baked in, so it is pointless to ‘combat’ it.
    It doesn’t matter what he or anyone else does at this point. It is a done deal.
    So do whatever it takes to stay in power.
    And make those borders secure. Build that wall strong and high.
    Or you will wind up like London, with people living on top of each other, fighting one another like mad dogs..
    A Tsunami is coming. A human Tsunami.

    • Jeanette says

      Mar 6, 2017 at 11:29 am

      The mention of overpopulation stopped at the same time that the Zero Population movement suddenly disappeared, around the late sixties.

      The globalists WANT a huge population; they will use it to justify their gleeful murder of 13 of every 14 people on Earth, as U.N. Agenda 2030 (previously Agenda 21) instructs.

      The more people there are, the more the globalists get to kill; do we need to know anything else about them? They are likely eating up the murderous atrocities they see the Muslims commit; that’s why the liberals love the Muslims – the globalists are elite liberals.

  16. Kenneth says

    Mar 6, 2017 at 12:18 pm

    Khan should declare independence from UK and declare direct allegiance to the emerging luciferian global Calliphate. By 2025, given the continued Islamic invasion / accelerating demographic shift, he will get the green light from his globalist masters. London is its own sovereign state like the Vatican, another coveted conquest of the Calliphate.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • James Lincoln on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration
  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.