Subscribe to the Glazov Gang‘s YouTube Channel.
This special edition of the Glazov Gang presents the Anne Marie Waters Moment with Anne Marie Waters, the Director of Sharia Watch UK.
Anne Marie unveils the Easy Guide to Debating the Useful Infidel. Part I: “Not All”, exposing the cowardice and malice behind the Left’s Jihad Denial.
Don’t miss it!
And make sure to watch Anne Marie focus on The Islamic Darkness Descends on Europe, where she unveils the horror that is now here and warns that now is the time to stand up and reclaim our civilization: CLICK HERE.
Please donate through our Pay Pal account or GoFundMe campaign to help The Glazov Gang keep going. Thank you!
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel and to Jamie Glazov Productions. Also LIKE us on Facebook and LIKE Jamie’s FB Fan Page.
Jerry says
Thanks Anne Marie Waters for all you do. I’m puzzled why you don’t get a bigger audience, you have so many good things to say on the issue. What you just said here is unassailable logic and brilliant. You made it perfectly clear, there can be no moral or legal defense for islam’s humanitarian crimes simply because not all muslim men are guilty. Such an assertion is fallacious on a childish level, but that’s what I hear all the time from apologists. But this is the moral reasoning of islam’s defenders, simply defer to some larger good thing and the lesser evil disappears. Let’s see, not all dogs have rabies and bite, so let’s ignore rabies. Um, not all snakes are poisonous, so let’s ignore the black mambas living under my house. I mean, this is the kind of intellectual sh*t they expect us to eat for islam, too. I’ve had my fill of their assanine ways. I swear, these fools could use a well placed slap on the face.
Jerry says
Oops, I said that backwards. I meant to say, “simply defer to some lesser good thing and the larger evil disappears.”
Keys says
Great analogies, Jerry. The problem is the the nature, the essence, of Islam.
overman says
Thanks Anne Marie. There are certainly many of these ‘useful lnfidels’ out there. lt seems to me that every time l hear a debate involving one of these lslamic Apologists, they are making this ‘not all’ claim – all part of their victim-hood agenda.
Only last night l heard a white australian saying 99% of muslims are like every other australian [debatable] and never cause any trouble [again debatable]. his is the problem. ln the mind of the ‘useful infidel’, they believe only a very small number [1% according to this guy] are implicitly involved in lslamic Jihad – when actually a vast number are carrying out the different types of Jihad [most don’t realize there’s more than one kind of Jihad]. This 1% myth is being broadcast everywhere, and makes the ‘not all’ taqiyya lie much easier to swallow.
overman says
Sorry, missed the typo –
“his is the problem”
Should be – ‘This is the problem’
Montedoro44 says
This is well worth implementing in conversation, even though it is predictable that the conversation is likely to end there when playing the bigot-card doesn’t work.
But there is one important element missing here, and that is, in addition to naming the predators as Muslims, explicitly stating that they are acting in the name of Islam, doing their deeds to please Allah, assuring their own salvation, et al. That’s the bridge between the common thread of their Muslim identity and their holy acts, and it is also a major point of contention in argumentation with apologists. Making this connection may also help to pre-empt defenses like these behaviors come from poverty, colonialism, victimization, insanity, or other.
Michael Copeland says
Good observation, thank you.
Lt. Col. Allen West’s phrase is useful – “doing exactly what this book says”.
Lauri Heikkilä says
Does this actually work? It’s the exact opposite of what I’ve read about effective debating tactics. Supposedly, accusations will only make your opponent dig into their position, no matter how illogical it is. Rather, appealing to their decency is supposed to be a good way to gain their understanding. But I don’t know, I don’t have enough experience on the matter to have a really informed opinion…
Spike1033 says
All these arguments are all very well but these muslims love to argue from their ‘We are superior because we love Allah’ standpoint. Many years ago when I was at school we had a little class bully who told the teacher that if he were caned then his dad would come and injure the teacher. The teacher hit him very hard and then gave him six of the best. The teacher, who was 6ft 5ins and an ex-soldier stood over the (now crying) little bully and said:
“In this classroom I am the boss. You will do as I say. If your father or your uncle want to complain I will deal with them in the same way.” The class bully didn’t give him any more trouble.
It’s a pity we don’t have any of those teachers in charge of our political parties. We only seem to have a bunch of wimps who will cave in at the first opportunity.
Dan says
Accusations that we on the left want bad things to happen and that we want white people crushed. I’mam white why would I want my own race destroyed?
Guest says
I think we need to be even tougher on the useful infidels: “If you support an ideology that uses violent, fascist methods against women, jews and infidels, YOU are the new fascists of Europe!”
Throw it right back at them. *They* are supporting racism, *they* are supporting slavery, *they* are supporting domestic violence, *they are supporting rape and murder of infidels. They are the new fascists of Europe.
gravenimage says
Anne Marie Waters Moment: Easy Guide to Debating the Useful Infidel. Part I: “Not All”
…………………….
I hadn’t seen Anne Marie Waters before. Thank you.
PRCS says
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=anne+marie+waters+islam
Monty says
I like to compare Islam with Nazi Germany. After all, Islam is the only religion that Hitler respected. Not all Germans were Nazis. Not all Germans supported Hitler. Europe sat on its hands and hoped that Hitler would not go to war. Hitler had declared his intentions already in “Mein Kampf”. The appeasement policies led to WW2 and around 60 million casualties. Europe has learned nothing. The Koran expressly relates how Islam is to dominate the world and its followers are carrying out the strategy. Not all Muslims, but enough to bring about a catastrophe that will erase liberal democracy from the planet.
c. says
Is this what they teach in schools? Hitler never had any intention of going to war with Europe. The rise of Hitler and National Socialism was a reaction to the violent Communist takeover in Russia. It was European leaders like Churchill that were looking for any excuse they could come up with to declare war on Germany. The banking cartel was very angry that Hitler dissolved their control over the banking system in Germany, so they pushed the other countries to “do something about it”.
There’s a common thread between the banking cartel and the Communists, I wonder what that could be?
Will Doohan says
So what are you implying c? That the Communists and the British and the ‘banking cartels’ were controlled by the Jews and that they were responsible for starting the war against an innocent Nazi Germany that only wanted peace? … Balderdash!
You must be a neo-nazi yourself to believe an idiotic theory like that.
Dan says
Islam will not dominate the world. The Muslims who say this are stupid morons with delusional problems,
mousey says
She conflates saying “not all” with “lets not make a big fuss of it, these things happen,” and that is error. The 2 MAY be within the same person but not necessarily. They are 2 distinct ideas.
Dan says
More or less what she said,
And as for her assertion that we “not all Muslims” want bad things to happen and want white people crushed was like
1357911 says
Anne Marie –
Thank you for the video and the air-tight argument. Unfortunately, it won’t work on ALL useful infidels, as was the case for me when I posed a nearly identical argument to two, young German men, who were visiting the place where I live, part time. Their response was:
“Well, yes, that’s true, but what’s the use of doing anything about all of the violent migrants in Germany; they’re just going to do it somewhere else, so what can we do?”
_______________________________________________
I was simply Gobsmacked and gave up, at that point. Maybe after your, “But the Bible” segment, you could address this nonsense.
LR says
Dang, that is bad….And thee are young German men? That is scary.
LR says
‘these’…not ‘thee’…
Dan says
What is a useful infidel? Anyone who says not all Muslims are bad? Yee fads
Matthieu Baudin says
Very good Anne Marie. Keep the flame alive.
Benedict says
Looking forward to the “but the Bible” part.
It is not a simplification to say, that with the gospels and St. Paul, the earthly and local confined belligerency around the Holy Land, portrayed in the Old Testament, was transmuted and directed “against spiritual wickedness in high places.” (Eph. 6) This “greater jihad”, that Muslims might call it, is never and cannot be advanced by military force (the Muslim sword) but solely by “the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.” (Eph. 6)
And this is the problem with Islam:
Islam is religion as politics and politics as religion. These conjoined twins cannot be separated without both of them die. It is therefore ridiculous and schizophrenic when politicians suggest, that we should support and promote religious Islam in the West in order to modify and pacify political Islam and avoid radicalization. It won’t work! You don’t quench a fire by pouring petrol on it. Religious Islam is the oxygen for political Islam is the meat of radical islam.
In the end, though, Islam will self-detonate and suicide bombers are thus a fitting symbol of this devilish inspired hate towards all of humanity. In the meantime we should make room for “the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.”
Lioness says
Not all muslims are terrorists, rapists, murderers or pedophiles, “only” about 30%. That’s 400 million, more than the entire US population. Another 30% of muslims are not terrorists or murderers, but they don’t oppose terror, they support islamic supremacy and sharia, which allows for rape and pedophilia. The rest are peaceful muslims who peacefully hate infidels, and wish that all Jews and Christians would peacefully disappear from the planet.
Dan says
Oh dear,
Gen Jones says
Thank you, Anne Marie. I like your direct calm style. This “Not All” attitude is similar to the popular “The odds of you or your loved ones being shot in a grocery store hold up – or slipping in the bathtub – or whatever random freak occurance they cite – is much greater than the odds of you being killed by a terrorist. This “fact” is supposed to calm the irrational islamophobe who sees a terrorist in every corner while pointing out the superior intelligence and moral superiority of the useful infidel. What the useful infidel is actually saying is “You aren’t special enough to be killed by a terrorist”, while ignoring the fact that the odds are 100% that someone else’s loved ones will be.
tim gallagher says
I admire all these brave people, such as Robert Spencer, Ann Marie Waters, Brigitte Gabriel and ex-Muslims like Wafa Sultan, Ibn Warraq, etc, because I know they’d all receive threats from Muslims and could be killed for their work in fighting against Islam. Her saying to the leftie idiots that they are showing that they just don’t care about the innocent victims of terror, rape, etc is a good thing to say. It might get through to some of them. But, of course, this “not all Muslims” line is just moronic anyway. I mean so what if not all Muslims are potential terrorists or violent criminals. Far more of them are than any other group. When I write to our politicians in Australia calling on them to end Muslim migration I just say, “Look, we have no trouble from our Buddhist, Christian, Jewish or agnostic migrants. We have trouble out of all proportion from our Muslim migrants. ” It’s indisputable. It’s the same everywhere in the world. So keep them out. It’s the only possible answer. Of course, our politicians keep right on importing the problem. Maybe one day they’ll wake up. I hope so.
.
Dan says
This the same argument feminists use about the “not all men” argument in general. That those who say not all men care not for the victims of rape and domestic abuse and they just care about the feelings of men not being hurt.
Yet this argument usually provokes outrage amongst many on the Right where as they opposes the “not all Muslim men” defence .
Dan says
Trust me I do not want white people crushed of terrible things to happen. If someone IS saying all Muslims are… then I will oppose it as it’s just dumb.
Dan says
What I am not getting is Anne objects to being labelled racist but she’s labelling people “useful infidels”. This is hardly constructive and just as counterproductive as labelling anyone who criticises Islamic extremism as racist.
To say we want to crush all whites is just ridiculous. That’s not even an argument, it’s just silly