Because of “rampant Islamophobia,” to stand in “solidarity” with hijab-wearing Muslim women.
Great. But who stands in solidarity with Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it? Or with Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab? Or the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; or Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; or Amira Osman Hamid, who faced whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; or the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; or the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; or the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; or the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; or the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; or the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; or the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; or the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents; or the fifteen girls in Saudi Arabia who were killed when the religious police wouldn’t let them leave their burning school building because they had taken off their hijabs in their all-female environment; or all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab?
Who is standing in solidarity with them? Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence. At the same time, the women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who speaks for them?
lasslax says
I wish you sent your questions to that hyppocrate president of Austria.
Custos Custodum says
Van der Bellen was only naturalized as an Austrian citizen at the age of 14.
People like VDB are the reason that the U.S. Constitution requires the President to be a “natural born” American.
Nietzsche says
Natural Born Austrians supporting the Green Party are no better. #notmypresident
gravenimage says
Yes–but I’m afraid there are plenty of native Austrians who are dhimmified, as well.
TassieR says
So, “Day will come when we ask all women to wear headscarf”? I’m sure Austrians knew perfectly well whom exactly they were electing, but probably their experience of dictatorship under Anschluss is just too old to remember that any Social-bureaucratic “We ask to…” ought to be translated as plain “We order to”.
gravenimage says
Tassie, I imagine a lot of Austrians are still in denial over the threat of Islam. I know that is true in her in my “blue state”.
Truth in Advertising says
http://derstandard.at/2794641/Nazi-Disput-Van-Staa-gegen-Van-der-Bellen—mit-Kommentar
Alexander van der Bellen’s father Alexander Konstanin von (sic) der Bellen was apparently a senior National Socialist functionary.
During the presidential campaign, van der Bellen faced rumours that his father had been a senior Nazi. He expressed outrage, but did not actually deny the facts.
Van der Bellen demanded proof of the rumours against his father who died 1966 when the son was about 22. Of course, all records had been carefully cleaned up before the election, and amnesia about the Nazi era is still acceptable in Austria.
salim says
With him and his likes in office, the day will come when all women will be forced to wear hijab, not for solidarity but for survival.
Karen says
Yes. It will begin with “asking” in a phony show of “solidarity”, but will morph into a requirement before anyone can blink twice.
And as Mortimer points out above, the hijab is a signal about who can, and cannot, be raped. Who stands in solidarity for the would-be rape victims, i.e., those who do not wear the hijab? You would think that removing a hijab would be more appropriate/compassionate/socially just.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Precisely Karen. This clown should lose the “ask” altogether; muzzrats never “ask” for anything. They DEMAND.
And if you don’t do what they demand, they kill you.
Johan Elzinga says
His majority is fragile. It has been but a few votes that put him in office. Now he will be kicked out soon, I hope. There is no place here in the West as far as I’m concerned for people who force women to wear headscarfs, nor is there place for politicians who sympathize with such ideas.
Sarah says
As a Western born, Caucasian female, I say without any melodrama or hesitation that the day I am ‘required’ to wear any form of covering instituted by Islam, will be the day I die.
I will never, ever, under any circumstances, bow to any pressure to show even the slightest sign of tolerance or respect for Islam. It is a cancer to the human race as a woman, my body is my own and no-one else’s.
gravenimage says
Don’t die–fight back!
Jeanette says
I suspect that’s what she means – she will fight and be killed by the better-trained and much more vicious Muslims.
Kay says
How easily we lose civilization!
Sam says
I really wonder that myself. Islam is winning so easily it is mind boggling.
Sam says
I really wonder that myself. Islam is winning so easily it is mind boggling.
Tony says
And soon we will be giving the Hitler salute to those dirty Moslems.
RichardL says
that guy won by a very small margin and he conned voters by running as an independent when he is a member of the communist wing of the Austrian Green Party. Former econometrics prof and one of the best universities in Europe. Published almost nothing. Typical Green totalitarian.
Jeanette says
If he defrauded the voters, one would think there might be some recourse for them against him.
Westman says
Austrian Women still, while not wearing a hijab, have the right to vote this man out of office.
Is there some malaise in Europe that desires to be ruled with an iron fist instead of democratically governed? Is there a “serf-pawn” gene?
Tom says
It’s called the lemming effect. See my comment below.
Bill says
Yes, I think there is such a gene. At least it is a gene in the European body politic. Even in England this political DNA is prevalent. It is worse though in Germany, France, Spain, Scotland, Sweden, Greece, Italy, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Ireland is a bit of conundrum, but they are slowly tending Islamic and are thoroughly beholden to the EU elites along with the rest of the EU principalities. Most, not all, but most Europeans just like the comfort of serfdom. They have consented to be disarmed, legally prohibited from defending themselves or their property, content to be on the dole, prepared to accept their lowest common denominator ration, and willing to let the elite care for them and protect them.
The funny thing is that the elite rarely protect them but live in kingly luxury, and when they condescend to offer protection, it is only with the blood and sacrifice of the serf.
TL says
Most living Caucasians are descended from Christians, and their ancestors were bred for more than 1,000 yrs to be stupid and sheepishly dependent. Most people who rejected shepherdocracy had their lines eliminated. So Europe’s leading political problem is basically genetic. Shaking off the chains of Christian superstition won’t correct the genetic defects accumulated during the many many centuries of dysgenic inbreeding. I believe also that communist activism during the past two and a half centuries is basically just a pseudointellectual reaction of conservatives who no longer accept Christianity but who are, of course, the prisoners of their bad mixtures of genes. Communism is an exercise in finding new excuses for shepherdocracy.
Michael Ray says
Welcome to Jihad Watch Herr Hitler. Nice of you to drop by and spew poisonous filth all over us.
Perhaps you could go f*#! off. Thanks again.
gravenimage says
TL wrote:
Most living Caucasians are descended from Christians, and their ancestors were bred for more than 1,000 yrs to be stupid and sheepishly dependent.
…………….
What claptrap. For one thing, Christians bravely fought back against Islam for hundreds of years.
You would not be here able to speak freely if this were not so.
And you waste your freedom babbling about genetic purity. Good grief…
By the way, the idea that Europeans are genetically inbred is anything but true.
Nietzsche says
63% of Austrian women, especially in the big cities, voted for this creep, after an incredibly onesided campaign for him in all the MSM, 24/7. Sometimes being a woman is embarrassing.
gravenimage says
You have no reason to be embarrassed–these idiots do, though.
Tom says
OMG who is it that votes these idiots into power? (Rhetorical)
It seems that Europe and Europeans have been teetering on the edge of a cliff for some time now and idiots like the Austrian President and the German Chancellor are bound and determined to push and push until they all go over that cliff.
The problem with these appeasers of Islam is that once over that cliff and into freefall it is too late to say “Oops we made a mistake” and the only thing that will stop that disastrous fall will be the hard rocks at the bottom of the cliff.
The French had a chance to stop the push but failed in the first round to do that. Le Pen was Europe’s chance to step back from the cliff edge but they didn’t take it.
janwaarbibi says
I don’t see a problem with asking Austrian women to wear a hijab – Austrian men already do.
TL says
FACILE VIRTUE SIGNALING: “Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence.”
Sane people, on the other hand, will understand that the Muslimah forfeited her right to peaceful and quiet enjoyment of life when she accepted the religion of ambush. Sane people will understand that the Islam problem is like a rat control problem, and every rat control solution must be focused on the female, without whom the rat control problem would soon disappear from this world.
Sane people do not care about how the Muslimah’s situation came about if the relevant knowledge does not help to achieve the goal. They are interested in RESULTS, not sentimental jouneys through brilliant rhetoric. They are interested in RESULTS, not sanctimonious posturing about punishing big bad “louts and creeps” who, whatever their faults, have a much better understanding about what must be done to rats who won’t readily abandon Islam.
mortimer says
TL wrote: “FACILE VIRTUE SIGNALING”
(YES! The president of Austria has done ZERO research on the Islamic veil which is the ULTIMATE PATRIARCHAL SYMBOL. The purpose of the Islamic veil is to DEFEND FIRST-COUSIN MARRIAGE and thereby to KEEP THE MONEY IN THE FAMILY!)
mortimer says
TL wrote: “FACILE VIRTUE SIGNALING”
(YES! The president of Austria has done ZERO research on the Islamic veil which is the ULTIMATE PATRIARCHAL SYMBOL. The purpose of the Islamic veil is to DEFEND FIRST-COUSIN MARRIAGE and thereby to KEEP THE MONEY IN THE FAMILY!)
gravenimage says
Dear Mortimer, TL is not saying that the witless Van der Bellen is virtue signalling–he is saying that *Robert Spencer* is, for noting that of course “hose who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence.”
Please read his post again. He is a nasty piece of work.
Michael Ray says
So you advocate the slaughter of women? Your pragmatic facism has brought you to the heights of courage and honor. We agree only in our opposition to jihad. Your diagnoses and remedies are repugnant.
gravenimage says
More fro the appalling TL:
FACILE VIRTUE SIGNALING: “Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence.”
Sane people, on the other hand, will understand that the Muslimah forfeited her right to peaceful and quiet enjoyment of life when she accepted the religion of ambush. Sane people will understand that the Islam problem is like a rat control problem, and every rat control solution must be focused on the female, without whom the rat control problem would soon disappear from this world.
……………………………
Civilized people do not mass slaughter women.
If you like this sort of thing, why don’t you just convert to Islam? *Ugh*.
mortimer says
The Austrian president clearly doesn’t understand that the Islamic veil is the ultimate symbol of PATRIARCHY and it is NOT religious apparel per se. The Islamic veil is a uniform of a jihadist army.
The purpose of the Islamic veil is to intimidate.
andra says
I am quite sure that he knows. These lefties want Islam to take over in Europe because they believe in Muslims to be controlled more easily. Van der Bellen and all the other Western lefities are working on the Islamisation of our word. I will never understand why they admire Islam and even less I understand why Van der Bellen has won the election in December. But it seems that most Europeans, unimportant wether they´re French, Austrian, Dutch, British, Swedish or German are more afraid of being called islamophobe than of being subject to Islam. – And I´m afraid that the Canadians and US-Americans in their majority see it the same way.
Vyx says
Will he also be OK with Muslims beating women? How about multiple wives? Will he be OK with Muslims molesting young girls? Will that all be normal and accepted?
Is this the Austria of the future?
andra says
Don´t you know yet that this behaviour is just an expression of a different culture? We have to accept that these people who come to Europe want to stay in their beloved way of living. IO
gravenimage says
Good questions, Vyx.
Jack Diamond says
“the day will come when we will have to ask all women to wear a headscarf-ALL!- out of solidarity toward those who wear it for religious reasons.”
The women of Austria have been warned, their President stands for the oppression and suffering of women and the symbol of their subservience, and the symbol of advancing sharia and its partner jihad, the symbol of “Islam is here, and taking over”. And you will “have to” as well.
Why stop with the hijab? What if the burqa and niqab outnumber the hijabs? What else can Austrian women do to show their solidarity?
Get a clitorectomy? Provide sexual services for Muslim fighters? Publicly endorse polygamy and wife beating and sex slavery and honor killing and child marriages, because, after all, it is their religious practice? Further, didn’t Muhammad teach that women are deficient in intelligence and therefore the witness of two of them is equal to that of one man…that they are subservient to men… that they are toys and sex objects, a man’s field to use as he pleases…that they are most like domestic animals?
Solidarity remember.
mortimer says
Excellent list from JD for NEW WAYS to show ‘SOLIDARITY’ with suffering Muslims women.
I offer one more method for Leftist women to ‘show solidarity’ with Muslim women
… VOLUNTEER TO BE PART OF MUSLIM MALE’S HAREM and remain captive for life, isolated in one or two rooms of his isolated Arabian home deprived of every human right, never to hear from your family or former friends who will all assume you are dead.
andra says
In a German blog there was a nice comment on this desastorous speech. It said: Speaking of solidarity – why not should all Muslim immigrants throw away their veils in order to Show solidarity with the rules and rites of their new homeland?
I liked that. But who on earth would ask for solidarity for indogene Europeans?
William mcCoy says
People like him are the real enemy ,to freedom and democratie
somehistory says
So, women can “wear what they want”…but they will be “asked”…translation …told…to wear a scarf.
Submission to the beast forced upon citizens.
Revelation 13 foretold it.
mortimer says
Yes, there will also be compulsory universal ADULT BREAST-FEEDING required at offices IN SOLIDARITY with Muslim women, of course!
Mohammed commanded women to BREAST-FEED ADULT MALES if they were required to do business with them regularly. That way, the man would become a ‘relative’ of the woman and not be permitted to have sex with her.
Isn’t Islam practical? (sarc/off)
Grace says
So glad now that my parents emigrated out of Germany back in 1967 or I’d be a part of this s**t show already I imagine. At the time I had just turned 9 and my English vocabulary consisted of a handful of words. My first year here (Canada) was absolutely horrid. Each and every school day I was picked on, laughed at, called a Nazi and beat up regularly during recess. Not knowing anything of WWII or Nazis at that age didn’t help either. Plus I was always made to wear dresses to school where everyone else wore pants/jeans, so I was bullied for that as well. Never cried more in my life than at that time of my life. Probably why I am now somewhat of an introvert.
I already envision the events in Europe as a preview of what is to come to North America and am not
EVER going to appease those MOFO’s by dressing in bed sheets and scarves EVER. If I were working for a company that requires a uniform then that is where I draw my line. I will NOT be dictated a dress code in my lifetime.
They can shove their ‘show of solidarity’ in wearing a headscarf where the sun don’t shine.
I truly feel sorry for the younger children of today and what may be their life within a decade or so. Nothing is perfect but the lifestyle and freedoms we have now should be cherished. Bought a copy of the Koran, not the whitewashed study version, to read and from what I have read to date to me is very depressing.
Michael Ray says
It will only become more so. The koran is the worst collection of vile ideas ever assembled in one volume. It’s filthiness cannot be overstated.
Carolyne says
And yet, in Guantanamo our military personnel are required to wear gloves when handling this book of horrors, because Muslims think non-Muslims are dirty. It is they who are dirty and if I were in control of this, I wouldn’t even let them have a Koran. This was George W Bush’s doing. Of course he went around saying “Islam is a religion of peace.” He has friends in high places in Saudi Arabia. He was bad, but I won’t get started on how bad Hussein Obama was.
JawsV says
You got to be kidding!!! What happened to Austria???
David says
We have a massive corrupt government with our judiciary involved, no one here cares about us people… if some1 says anything against the mainstream opinion of our forced-charge financed state-TV-channel “ORF” he/she is called a “nazi”, a “Reichsbürger” or a “Staatsverweigerer” – just this week 26 people got arrested because they “denied state”… young families get their property stolen by corrupt judiciary (otherwise mine would be gone for more than 1,5 years now)… but if you are Austrian who has “human right problems” it is just “crying at a high level” for all those “welcome” and human right yellers, once we have been told “you can go to North Korea if you dont like it here” o.O
Carlos Danger says
The day will come when we “ask” all quislings to pi$$ up a rope.
David says
This “president” is a shame and the election was most likely rigged… even google already showed Norbert Hofer (Freedom Party) as elected president of Austria – before the postal votes came in… Bellen then was 30.000 Votes infront of Hofer >_< As we know now over 80.000 Turks have illegal dual citizenship, and already those votes have been enough in this case. Before the election the Mayor of Vienna, Michael Häupl, said that he "will do everything what is in his power to prevent Hofer"… sad to say but Austria is already lost.
Winston says
David,
What is the legal position regarding the dual-citizen Turkish vote for the Austrian president? Has it been addressed? Or even explained?
gravenimage says
Muslim Turks who have inveigled Austrian citizenship can vote in Austrian elections–even if they are also voting in Turkish elections.
Winston says
Mmm. I see. I think.
David says
This article written by a member of the austrian green party (and muslim by himself!) is very interesting (please translate for yourself): http://efganidoenmez.at/2016/10/24/arroganz-der-macht-die-kindesweglegung-der-spoe/
He says that the Viennese government is involved with radical-islamic groups like mili görüs or the muslim brotherhood… national newspapers reportet last year about massive corruption at tax money financed muslim kindergardens… we have tax money promoted associations here for “human rights”, but all just for foreigners, none for us citizens,… etc etc etc
gravenimage says
Very disturbing.
utis says
What kind of power trip is this loon on? Who the hell is he really, to tell all Austrian women what to wear? Moslems are brain-washed to see woman as an undifferentiated mass. This is precisely why I hate Communism, Islamism and any -ism that obliterates the individuality of human, making them as indistinguishable as an ant on an ant-hill.
And where are the damned feminists, protesting against President Bottom-Feeder?
gravenimage says
Austrian President: Day will come when we ask all women to wear headscarf
……………………….
Well, *f*ck that*.
And this dhimmi tool uses the imperative–we will *have* to ask all women to wear the headscarf. He also appears uncertain as to whether Muslim men wear headscarves. What a moron.
Here’s more stupidity from Van der Bellen:
“Austria’s new president calls for a tolerant nation and united Europe”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/26/austrias-new-president-calls-for-a-tolerant-nation-and-a-united-europe
We all know what that means–stick with the EU and its untrammeled importation of hordes of ravening Muslims, and show tolerance for the rape and mass murder which follows.
He says “change generates fear”–as though any rational person would not be afraid–or just enraged–over Muslims raping women and small boys with impunity in Austria.
His opponent was *much* saner on Muslim immigration.
dumbledoresarmy says
I would rather wear the Star of David in solidarity with the Jews who are being attacked and driven out of Europe by the invading Muslims.
I would rather go and get tattooed with the Coptic Cross on my wrist or my forehead, in solidarity with the persecuted Christians of Egypt.
Either or both of those gestures would actually mean something.
Whereas putting on a hijab in solidarity with Muslims is as if someone in the Allied lands in 1940 were to don a Swastika armband in solidarity with all those poor, poor misunderstood and persecuted Nazis…
This Austrian FOOL needs to have *that* pointed out to him, over and over.
Is there anyone brave enough to do some street theatre? Or even just a cartoon.
Three figures strutting down a street side by side: one in a KKK hood and robe, one goose-stepping with a Swastika armband, and.. one in the Mohammedan female Slave Hood/ Sharia Badge.
Caption: “Supremacists All, in Their Gang Uniform”.
Here’s another suggestion: a cartoon showing 1/ a Thuggee cultist despatching a victim with the strangling cord and 2/ the two Allahu-akbaring Muslims about to murder that priest in Rouen in France.
Caption – “Death Cultists Engaging in Acts of worship”.
Darryl Kerney says
great example of being VolunTold to do something…..
berserker says
Women voted overwhelmingly for this man. Now they can wear their Hijabs in solidarity. Well done!
Alexander says
Idiot.
ketzel says
Why doesn’t he wear a headscarf, or at least the male equivalent? Muslim men wear funny clothing too, he should dress like that in solidarity, and grow a huge beard. Or does he expect women to do all the work?
Carolyne says
I wonder what it is with religion and women’s hair. Until fairly recently women were required to cover their heads when entering a Catholic Church and still must do so when in the presence of the Pope. Muslim women must cover their hair or face severe penalties, even death.
The whole thing is ridiculous. If there were a god who didn’t want women to show their hair he would have made them bald.
ibrahim itace muhammed says
christian women should also be require to clean their private parts with water after sex,shits,menses and urination to avoid horrible bad smells associated with christianity inspired by the devil the owner of bad smells.why Christians refuse to adopt islamic system of hiegene not provided in their evil bible?But learn that many christian nations have incorporated sharia compliant financial system due to its tremendous advantage in accelerating their economy.why not Islamic hiegene system to free Christians from producing disgusting bad smells.the Australian pm is right to require Christians to use modest dressing,not savage animal way of life.
Lyn Gray says
By the way it’s the AUSTRIAN President not the AUSTRALIAN Prime Minister. You really are a revolting person with your demands. There is nothing more unhygenic than a man with a bushy beard or who wipes his arse with his hand after going to the toilet. We now have the problem of muslim men shitting in the streets.
Please don’t preach to me or anyone else about cleanliness because you just don’t have a clue.
gravenimage says
Repulsive Muslim apologist ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
christian (sic) women should also be require (sic) to clean their private parts with water after sex,shits,menses (sic) and urination to avoid horrible bad smells associated with christianity (sic) inspired by the devil the owner of bad smells.
…………………………….
ibrahim itace muhammed has flogged this idiocy here before. The fact is that Westerners are *far* more hygienic than are Muslims. And no–women do not have to be threatened with violence to maintain cleanliness.
In fact, the Hijab–and especially forms like the Burqa are extremely *un-hygienic*. This is not about cleanliness–it is about forcing women into compliance.
More:
why (sic) Christians refuse to adopt islamic (sic) system of hiegene (sic) not provided in their evil bible (sic)?
…………………………….
The Bible is actually taken up with spiritual matters. It is only Muslims who think that bathroom superstitions should fall under religion. And yet–as in all such matters–Westerners are far more hygienic than are Muslims.
We invented indoor plumbing–Muslims invented wiping with stones. Compare and contrast.
More:
But learn that many christian (sic) nations have incorporated sharia compliant financial system due to its tremendous advantage in accelerating their economy.
…………………………….
muhammed has made these ludicrous claims here before, as well–the fact is that the West is wealthy and innovative, and Muslim countries–even those with unearned oil wealth–are stagnant sh*tholes.
Can muhammed explain why the Muslim world trails not just the West but so much of Dar-al-Harb if “sharia compliant finance” is so good for the economy? Of course he can’t.
More:
why (sic) not Islamic hiegene (sic) system to free Christians from producing disgusting bad smells.the (sic) Australian pm is right to require Christians to use modest dressing,not (sic) savage animal way of life.
…………………………….
Once more, muhammed is confusing Islamic ritual “purity” with actual cleanliness. This should surprise no one. Really, he is not very intelligent.
Note, also, that he confuses Austria with Australia, which is half-way around the world. Again, the ignorance of Muslims can never be overestimates.
And he appears to believe that Van der Bellen accepts Muslim ideas about ritual purity, which he did not even mention.
Really, the semi-literate ibrahim itace muhammed is *very* indicative of the caliber of Muslim thought.
Lydia says
Not me!
The only headscarf I would ever wear by my own will would have to have a cross on it, or many crosses so they know I’m a Christian. A headscarf is not necessarily ‘muslim’ in and of itself. In the middle east during earlier times, all women did this and Christians did too. The virgin Mary is seen depicted in one in all Nativity scenes as a result. Many churches have traditions of head coverings to this day as a result. I even wear one because of what it says in one place in the New Testament during certain times, and it is an exclusively Christian act. But that is another issue, just so that no one would confuse me with a muslim, I would also have a big cross around my neck and on the headscarf so that no one could miss it that I am a Christian and NOT a muslim. Thank you.
: D
Cecilia Ellis says
“Austrian President: ‘Day will come when we ask all women to wear headscarf'”
. . . . . . . . . . .
It, instead. would have been a laudable act of leadership for the Austrian President to say: “The day will come when we ask all Muslim men to wear a straitjacket . . . to prevent them from raping women, from stabbing the elderly and those in wheelchairs, from driving vehicles, building bombs, holding guns (knives, pressure cookers, telephones, box cutters, axes, swords, etc.), from pointing that one-finger sign to Allah (not to be confused with the anti-jihadist, one-finger sign to Allah ?), from trying to build a defense case of “mental illness” after slaughtering infidels, in accordance with Islamic canonical text mandates, to screams of “Allahu Akbar!”, or from grovelling on the floor five times a day.”
I am sure that creative JW readers can add to the list . . ..
The Austrian President has failed immeasurably in safeguarding Austrian non-Muslim citizenry. Indefensible!
Schrödinger says
Might we contemplate the day we ourselves will politely request all muslim women to remove their headscarfs, hijabs, niqabs, burkas, burkinis — any and every manifestation of oppressive female muslim attire — in sympathy and solidarity with non muslims for the rampant Kuffarphobia inherent in islam? Dare we envisage a day muslims themselves will make this simple request of all muslim women?
Both questions are risible. Particularly the latter.
If someone should make any assertive reference to this term “islamophobia” in your presence, or even accuse you of it, just ask them what they mean by it. That’s right, it’s a fake term, oxymoronic in terms of it’s very construction, a cynically contrived neologism to be deployed routinely, even ubiquitously, whether casually and thoughtlessly or calculatedly and viciously, to reinforce the false muslim victimhood narrative by both muslims and their Dhimmi apologists, by inducing confusion, shame and fear — especially fear — to help silence all criticism of islam and all opposition to the jihad.
Not once but twice brave, outnumbered Austrian armies repelled the islamic hordes at the gates of Vienna, possibly saving all Europe from subsequent islamic conquest.
Nowadays, as the astute, conservative Canadian political commentator Mark Steyn has dryly observed, the enemy is all among us and there are no gates.
Jay says
The hijab is just as much a symbol of supremacist totalitarianism as was the Nazi swastika and other Nazi paraphernalia in WWII. I see no reason not to verbally question and criticize people wearing hijabs, just as people would verbally question and criticize others wearing the swastika. As for people carrying ISIS flags, those should be arrested and prosecuted as enemy operatives in time of war, under military tribunal.