• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Canada: Imam says of Qur’an’s wife beating verse that “it means to hit the person with a twig, a small twig”

Apr 10, 2017 10:16 am By Christine Douglass-Williams

The imam who advised the Peel District School Board (PDSB) in Mississauga (bordering Toronto) “on religious accommodation explains Quranic verse on wife beating.”

The PDSB has been in the spotlight over its over accommodation to Muslims at the expense of many frustrated parents who are concerned about the Islamization of their children’s school.

Back in January, Jihad Watch reported that the PDSB:

is not only allowing Islamic sermons, but it is also refusing to monitor the contents of those sermons. This is despite the very real risk of the jihad doctrine being spread……a large assembly of the Peel District School Board listened to the lamentations from the Muslim community “that Muslim students feel stigmatized and targeted” because their Friday prayers were restricted to pre-approved sermons, whereas previously, Muslim students were free to use any sermon they chose that was approved by an administrator.

The board also bent over backwards, working for over a year “with 10 local imams to develop the six sermons to be used during Friday prayers”; these were intended to be used “as a starting point,” to be developed to “a collection of hundreds of sermons available to students.”

When protests erupted, Peel police intervened as though they were Sharia police.

The situation at the PDSB escalated to the point of another protest, more like an outburst of rage. In mid-March, about 80 protesters showed up to a board meeting to demonstrate against the Muslim prayer accommodation. One protester at the meeting ripped out pages of the Quran and then stomped on it.

As reported by the Toronto Star:

Brian Woodland, director of communications for the Peel board, said an email was sent to several imams asking what should be done with the Qur’an…

The Peel Board continued its kowtowing to the Muslim community by reaching out in apology and putting the ripped Quran back together again.

Now CIJ news reports that in November, imam Ibrahim Hindy of Dar Al-Tawheed Islamic Centre in Mississauga, who “helped to develop the current policy at the Peel District School Board,” went to great lengths to explain to the school board about what beating your wife really means in Islam. The minutes indicated that he substituted the word “beat” with “tap.”

It is stunning and outrageous that Islamic indoctrination has made its way into the Peel District School Board, replete with wife assault instructions and a flagrant disregard of rightly concerned parents.

“Imam who advised PDSB on religious accommodation explains Quranic verse on wife beating”, Jonathan Halevi, CIJ News, April 7, 2017:

Ibrahim Hindy is the imam of Dar Al-Tawheed Islamic Centre in Mississauga, Ontario who according to CBC “helped to develop the current policy at the Peel District School Board.”

On November 22, 2016, Imam Ibrahim Hindy appeared in front of the PDSB regarding the revised Religious Accommodation Operation Procedures for Jummah (Friday noon prayers). The following is an excerpt from PDSB’s minutes:

Delegation of Ibrahim Hindy re Friday Prayer Accommodation Ibrahim Hindy, an Imam of Dar Al-Tawheed Islamic Centre in Mississauga, delegated the Board regarding the Friday prayer accommodation. He later provided his speaking notes to the administration. Ibrahim Hindy spoke of his role of counselling young Muslim students, a majority of whom are struggling through consequences of Islamophobia, and he expressed concerns about what he felt was an authoritative implementation of the religious accommodation, after limited consultation with the Muslim community. He acknowledged that, while the procedure seeks to prevent inappropriate teachings within the public school, in his opinion, the more acceptable approach would be to include greater community consultation, specifically with the students who are most affected by the OP. Ibrahim Hindy suggested bringing together Board representatives, students and faith leaders together to ensure an inclusive, creative, and respectful solution.
In an interview with a representative of the Renew Church, “a multi-site church in the GTA that is committed to helping people find new faith, new focus and new frontiers”, Ibrahim Hindy explained the Islamic faith and it implications on the life of the Muslim believers. The following are excerpts from the interview that was published on YouTube on March 20, 2016:

Question:

There are a couple of verses in the Quran that seem to condone something that we would find very difficult, and that is a man striking his wife under certain circumstances, so Surah [Chapter] 4 [Verse] 34, 38, 44. There seems to be allusion to that. How are those passages to be understood?

[Chapter 4, Verse 34: “Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband’s] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance – [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.” (translated by Sahih International)]

Ibrahim Hindy:

We only need one passage of [Chapter] 4 [Verse] 44, that’s the one I would say problematic in that sometimes people do take it out of context. This verse, you know, let’s kind of, how do we interpret the Quran. Let’s go back to the basics, to the principals. We interpret the Quran based on what the prophet [Mohammad] said and did, but we also interpret the Quran based on how earliest Muslims understood it, right? So this verse talks about, you know, when there is a marriage discord, the husband should leave the bed, leave the wife in the bad for a while, and if that doesn’t work, then he could strike her, and if that doesn’t work, then to go for a divorce. Essentially this is what the verse says. Some people have, I would say, more of a liberal understanding of this verse’s interpretation, those say: the word for strike in Arabic could mean to take a path, to strike a path. So those say: This is simply to leave, both of them have to leave. I don’t really ascribe to that. I do think it is to strike. However how did Muslims really understand this? So I go back to earliest Muslims, all of them said: it means to hit the person with a twig, a small twig, like a pen or something, to hit a person with a pen. Now, someone would say: why would you do that? What is the reason of that? How that makes any sense? So the way that I look at the way that I preach about it, is that this verse is talking about, and I’m sure you have a long experience with this, where you have, you know, married couples and they are having problems, they are not communicating and all of a sudden one side says: I want a divorce. The other side says: Ow, that comes [by surprise], I didn’t expect that to happen, right? So, really it is a situation where there’s a breakdown in communication. One side doesn’t understand how bad it’s getting for the other side. So this verse is about when the verbal communication breaks down you need to still communicate in other ways. So one way to communicate is you leave the bed, so in that way the wife knows, hey, this is really getting to a point where he is even going to leave in the bed and sleep somewhere else. And if that doesn’t work, then you tap the person, this is a type of non-verbal communication, this striking with a pen, with a twig, to say: this has reached its limit, I don’t have any other avenue after this other than divorce. And if that still doesn’t work you get a divorce… so that’s how I understand the verse, and that’s how the majority of Muslims understand the verse. Unfortunately, there are some Muslims, and domestic violence is a problem in all cultures, in all countries, in this country see the statistics are terrible, the same in the United States, and the same problem, sure the statistics in the Muslim world as well, and unfortunately some Muslims probably are prone to beat their wives anyways…..

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Canada, Islamic supremacism, Sharia, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Ibrahim Hindy, Peel District School Board


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Transmaster says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 10:22 am

    Well of course beating your wife with cooked Asparagus is perfectly OK.

    • DFD says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 10:57 am

      Don’t let that be read by Bill Clinton, & Monica…

    • p says

      Apr 11, 2017 at 8:28 am

      Its bullshi**. I saw the videos. Lucky if they live

  2. Linda (Ontario,Canada) says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 10:24 am

    What a lying deceptive abusive load of crap. Had to say it,and yes, offence intended btw.

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 6:28 pm

      Yes–this is utter bs. So sorry this lying thug is in your beautiful country, Linda.

      • Linda (Ontario,Canada) says

        Apr 10, 2017 at 6:41 pm

        Thank you, again,you always have kind words of support. God bless you.

  3. salim says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 10:36 am

    The Quran ORDERS Muslims to beat their wives whenever they SUSPECT they might disobey. It is written in clear Arabic and no human can change the word of Allah.
    “…. and if you fear their disobedience, beat them …”

    Funny thing, in the English translations the word “lightly” is added to soften the order.

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 6:37 pm

      Not so funny–just more Taqiyya.

    • Tom says

      Apr 11, 2017 at 10:25 am

      It is my understanding that, to a muslim, the word of Allah is sacrosanct and must be strictly adhered to without question.

      This Imam is using Taqiyya to deceive the fools at the school board into believing that the words of Allah can be manipulated to suit their liberal left wing views.

      Women are equal to men in our western culture and for this school board to accept wife beating, in any form, is relegating women to second class human status.

      The school board must resign immediately.

  4. mortimer says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 10:38 am

    PREPOSTEROUS FRAUD!

    -I have not seen any women suffering as much as the believing women.” -Aisha commenting on a Muslim wife whose skin was green from beatings (Sahih al Bukhari 5825)
    -“Hang up your scourge where your wife can see it.” Kash-shaf (the revealer) of al-Zamkhshari (Vol. 1, p. 525)

    -Sahih Muslim (4:2127) – Muhammad struck his favorite wife, Aisha, in the chest one evening when she left the house without his permission. Aisha narrates, “He STRUCK me on the chest which caused me PAIN.”

    -Sahih Muslim (9:3506) – Muhammad’s fathers-in-law (Abu Bakr and Umar) AMUSED him by SLAPPING his wives (Aisha and Hafsa) for annoying him. According to the Hadith, the prophet of Islam LAUGHED upon hearing this.

    -Abu Dawud (2141) – “Iyas bin ‘Abd Allah bin Abi Dhubab reported the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) as saying: Do not beat Allah’s handmaidens, but when ‘Umar came to the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) and said: Women have become emboldened towards their husbands, he (the Prophet) gave PERMISSION to beat them.” At FIRST, Muhammad forbade men from beating their wives, BUT he RESCINDED this once it was reported that women were becoming emboldened toward their husbands.

    -Abu Dawud (2142) – “The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife.”

    • salim says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 2:34 pm

      Mortimer: Excellent collection of hadiths. Muslims should be very proud of their prophet, especially women, who tend to be more religious than men!

      There is a growing trend among modern Muslims to distance themselves from any hadith (or all of them) that shames Islam. They find it an easier option, as it preserves Mohammed’s integrity. They find the vagueness of the Quran helpful to interpret the verses as they wish.

      • Rob says

        Apr 11, 2017 at 11:41 pm

        That’s the Mecca portion of the Koran (the “religion of peace” part). Unfortunately, the Medina portion of the Koran, which was “revealed” later in time, abrogates most (225) of the peaceful passages of the Mecca portion. Both portions of the Koran are considered valid but the Medina portion carries more religious weight. Since both portions of the Koran are valid and “holy”, the Mecca portion can be lived but the Medina portion cannot be criticized or denied. Coupled with the sanctification of Taqiya (allowable deceit), this duality of the Koran makes it virtually impossible for any non-Muslim to absolutely establish the true position and intent of any Muslim. Sad but true.

    • Hindu American says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 4:05 pm

      Thanks for the detailed hadiths, Mortimer. A western apologist/dhimmi, however, will be careful to mention just the “managed basic” sayings to prove how “forward thinking” muhammad really was:

      – Abu Dawud (2141) – Do not beat Allah’s handmaidens… Muhammad forbade men from beating their wives.
      – Abu Dawud (2142) – The Prophet.. asked: why he beat his wife?

      See how it works. Devil is in the details.

      • Marcello Luciano says

        Apr 12, 2017 at 8:35 am

        @hahahah Mr Hindu American why you do not post the whole Hadith Abu Dawud (2141) ?here is the whole hadith the best proof that you are lying>>
        Abu Dawud 11,2141: ” Narrated Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab:Iyas ibn Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab reported the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) as saying: Do not beat Allah’s handmaidens, but when Umar came to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) and said: Women have become emboldened towards their husbands, he (the Prophet) gave permission to beat them. Then many women came round the family of the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) complaining against their husbands. So the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: Many women have gone round Muhammad’s family complaining against their husbands. They are not the best among you.” [Source materials are from the University of Southern California MSA site
        Hadith eBooks converted from Imaan Star]
        [ http://www.quranexplorer.com/Hadith/English/index.html ]
        At first, Muhammad forbade men from beating their wives, but he rescinded this once it was reported that women were becoming emboldened toward their husbands. Beatings are sometimes necessary to keep women in their place and at the end he says those women who complain about their husband are not good!!!!

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 6:38 pm

      Thanks for the Hadiths, Mortimer.

    • VRWC member77 says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 6:40 pm

      Adding to mortiimer’s post:

      *********Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Salik) – Classic Manual for Islamic Law *********

      m 10.12 – DEALING WITH A REBELIOUS WIFE , page 540:

      “When a husband notices signs of rebelliousness in his wife whether in words, as when she answers him coldly when she used to do so politely. or he asks her to come to bed and she refuses. contrary to her usual habit; or whether in acts, as when he finds her averse to him when she was previously kind and cheerful). he warns her in words without keeping from her or hitting her, for it may be that she has an excuse. The warning could be to tell her, “Fear Allah concerning the rights you owe to me,” or it could be to explain that rebelliousness nullifies his obligation to support her and give her a turn amongst other wives, or it could be to inform her, “Your obeying me is religiously obligatory”. If she commits rebelliousness, he keeps from sleeping (0: and having sex) with her without words, and MAY HIT HER, but not in a way that injures her, meaning he may not (A: bruise her,) break bones, wound her, or cause blood to flow. (0: It is unlawful to strike another’s face.) HE MAY HIT HER whether she is rebellious only once or whether more than once, though a weaker opinion holds that he may not hit her unless there is repeated rebelliousness.

  5. RAB says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 10:44 am

    What has all this empty verbiage got to do with the presence and influence of Islam in a Canadian school? The explanation for wife-beating in the Koran given by this Imam is below the level of a Kindergarten child. The whitewashing of Islam here reaches the ultimate in absurdity and simply reflects the low intelligence of this imam, who apparently cannot see that the symbolism of wife-beating is at issue here, not the force or method of the beating. Even if the irate husband uses a feather with which to beat his wife, the message remains the same, the woman is inferior to the man in Islam, which is of course well-documented. How much more of this Islamic nonsense are we going to up with?

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 6:40 pm

      All true, RAB. There is no husband beating verse in the Qur’an.

  6. RAB says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 10:50 am

    Correction: How much more of this Islamic nonsense are we going to put up with? Sometimes I get so frustrated with all the taqiyya, the downright lies, and the utter stupidiy from Muslims, I type too fast. Sorry about that.

  7. gretel says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 10:58 am

    First part of the problem is, they OWN their wives. And it’s downhill from there.

    • Shmooviyet says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 11:25 am

      Yes!
      Ibby is trying to polish up a muslim “property right”, looking damned stupid to anyone who doesn’t believe in owning humans.
      ( which leaves out the virtue-advertising “I love my Muslim neighbors” crowd; apparently slavery is acceptable– IF it’s a cultural thing.)

  8. Shmooviyet says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 11:06 am

    The paragraph quoting Ibrahim Hindy is laughable!
    “Tap with a pen” or “twig”??
    “Strike a path”?
    Communication breakdown?!
    What a load of whitewashed STINK from this legion of evil, epic liars. Use of the word “religion” for a mask being the biggest lie of all.

  9. Ed Lee says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 11:08 am

    Mark Twain wrote, “First God made idiots. This was for practice. Then he made school boards”.

  10. Dan says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 11:42 am

    A long time ago, when the British ruled India, when local man died it was the custom that the widow be burned on his funeral pyre.

    The British demanded it stop.

    The Indians said it was their custom.

    So the British said, “Well it’s our custom to hang people who burn women alive.” and the practice eventually stopped.

    So Imams, tell your men this. It may be your custom for men to hit their wives. But it’s OUR custom to take men who do and lock their asses up.”

    • Hindu American says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 4:10 pm

      You have it all wrong. It was not a Hindu custom. It was a practice. Please learn the difference.

      • gravenimage says

        Apr 10, 2017 at 9:15 pm

        With all respect, Hindu American, it was a hideous practice, and I’m glad it is a thing of the past.

        • Hindu American says

          Apr 11, 2017 at 5:10 pm

          I do not want to digress but I agree with your point. It was a hideous practice but not a custom. “Custom” makes it mandatory. It took a Hindu reformer Ram Mohan Roy (and not the English) to banish this practice. There are other practices that have been expunged over the years – caste system, dowry… One thing about Hinduism. It self reforms and introspects with the changing time on a continuing basis unlike islam which is fixed in time and rigid in thought.

          Apologies for digressing.

      • eur says

        Apr 11, 2017 at 12:01 pm

        There is no difference, they practiced it. Inquisition and similar institutions also burned women accused of witches, heretics … (they were ignorant religious fanatics) and was not something Christian … but undoubtedly was practiced by the Christian authorities. That practice of Christian message has nothing. Muslims are bad bugs, their religion if they contemplate all the barbarities they do, they are not practices carried out by Muslims … they are Islamic practices.

        • gungadin says

          Apr 14, 2017 at 4:25 am

          I received from my local library branch yesterday an announcement of a presentation “An Introduction to Islam” by (whomever)

          My response to their message to me was my asking if “we are soon to see “Introductions” to other great world religions”

          And then I listed a few.

          Seems to me this “sensitivity” to the “needs” of recognition to Islam has gone beyond the pale.

    • God's Warrior says

      Apr 11, 2017 at 6:01 am

      In India, widows did not want to be raped by the invading Muslim hordes, so they would rather die in their own time on their slain husband’s funeral pyre.

      Indians with firm faith in the ancient Vedic scriptures know that the eternal soul cannot be burned or cut, having once been it never ceases to be, and that “samsara” (i.e. the transmigration of the soul or reincarnation) explains that material life continues on until they have perfected their love for God. Hence they are a vast country of Koala bears, sweet, happy and peaceful old souls.

      80 million murdered in India alone! It is especially for that reason that I curse all jihadis throughout all time to spend billions of years living as worms and slugs under rocks, never seeing the sun. If it is darkness they want; then let them have it in abundance!

  11. Stan Lee says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 11:52 am

    More lying to cover up what this Imam Hindy thinks the koran means. Islam ought to state what it really means without the intercession of this imam who is trying to convince a school board of officious morons that Islam doesn’t mean what “is written,” that Islam is actually benevolent.

    Perhaps the next alibi will be a statement that beating doesn’t really mean “beating,” that slitting of throats, an act assigned to all “believers” does not mean murdering, that the words of one Muslim revealing that a Jew conceals himself behind said Muslim, plus that Muslim’s request for another Muslim to kill the Jew, doesn’t mean what the words in the koran state.

    Since all the murderous directives of the koran really do not mean what the words describe,according to Hindy the imam, then it remains for Islam, in the 21st century, to officially reinterpret its Arabic , which utilizes murder resulting from the hate it teaches, to words it really means in the 21st century.

    Plus, Islam should refute what it has lived by in approximately fourteen centuries.and have all korans recalled in exchange for the “true words” in a new koran that Islam really means what (according to imam Hindy,) the religion really is by its writings.

    How stupid is this Canadian school board? Do they really believe that Islam in Ontario Province, Canada is far more benevolent in their school district, than Islam is in Germany, UK, or Sweden?
    Islam does not deal in benevolence, once again it proved what it is with two Coptic Christian church bombings, killings innocents in prayer in those churches, on Palm Sunday in Egypt!

  12. mortimer says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 11:52 am

    According to Islamic law, a husband may strike his wife for any one of the following four reasons:

    – She does not attempt to make herself beautiful for him (ie. “let’s herself go”)
    – She refuses to meet his sexual demands
    – She leaves the house without his permission or for a “legitimate reason”
    – She neglects her religious duties

    Any of these are also sufficient grounds for divorce.

    -Respected Quranic scholars in the past interpreted verse 4:34 with impressive candor.
    -Tabari said that it means to “admonish them, but if they refused to repent, then tie them up in their homes and beat them until they obey Allah’s commands toward you.”
    -Qurtubi told wife-beaters to avoid breaking bones, if possible, but added that “it is not a crime if it leads to death.”

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 1:03 pm

      Allah’s commands towards women. There are many, and being worth half a man means twice the reason to obey. Congrats to Gloria Steinem and Pat Ireland for their fearless criticism of Islam.

    • eur says

      Apr 11, 2017 at 12:05 pm

      the most feminist religion…hahahahahahahahahahahaha

  13. marina says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 12:16 pm

    School is for education not islamic prayers. Why do the Moslems get all the attention. Canada is going to come to a bad end if they don’t stop this caving in to the mahommedans.

  14. Carole says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 2:28 pm

    So since some say that Islam is gender equal, then women can “tap” their husbands too.

    If Islamism is going to be allowed in schools, then every other religion should get equal time.

    Or….. every religion should be practiced off of school grounds. Religion should NOT be allowed in public schools supported by tax payers.

  15. Peter Wagner says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    Is there a corresponding husband beating verse in the Quran?

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 10, 2017 at 6:21 pm

      Good question, Peter–of course not, this is all one way.

    • Rob says

      Apr 11, 2017 at 11:07 pm

      The prophet Mohammad slugged his adolescent wife in the stomach and then ridiculed her for thinking that he wouldn’t do it. “Beat” means beat.

  16. Shmued B Dovid says

    Apr 10, 2017 at 7:24 pm

    It must therefore be OK to slit the throats of muslims with a small knife as opposed to a larger one.?

  17. God's Warrior says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 4:48 am

    CANADIAN BROWNOPHOBIA!
    These imams lie, thinking we are all stupid. But I tell the truth, revealing God’s revelation, and yet still I am stonewalled by the government:

    I am currently trying to get tax-exempt status for the real religion as revealed to me a while back on the Holiest day. I had begged God to reveal Himself, and suddenly everything disappeared and all I could see was beautiful brown everywhere. And know this now, my children: God’s name is Brown. There is no brown but Brown!

    Since then His demands for His true followers have been revealed to my mind:

    1) Any male not dressed completely in brown is to be killed. They are to be hung by their ankles, and then have their throats cut, spilling their blood on the ground, pleasing Brown by creating a glorious maroon stain on the earth. Such is Brown’s absolute mercy. But know directly, my children: beige and tan are never brown; indeed, they are an abomination in the eyes of the Lord!

    2) Any female not wearing brown (or combining other colours with brown) shall be raped. If the Brown-Shirts find this task too inconvenient at the time, they may kill them as though they were male, assuring them the glorious maroon death mercy of Brown.

    3) As yet we have no written laws, but still, if anyone does not accept my vision and revelations based solely on the words of Brown’s servants, the most glorious Brown-Shirts, they are to be punished as above, that they may receive Brown’s mercy after their glorious maroon death.

    4) Brown’s servants shall observe the following social conventions: no one can marry under the age of six, items brown in colour may never be burned.

    My religion was at first rejected for tax-exempt status by the Brownophobic bureaucrats, but soon my Brown-Shirt flock will occupy those government posts so the legislation will pass, and Brown will be worshiped in all the world!

    Stay Brown!

  18. Politicianphobia says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 10:03 am

    It is called assault in Canada. If you can not follow Canadian law get out of our country.

    • eur says

      Apr 11, 2017 at 12:08 pm

      nopppp they will stand there and you and while you will work and can hardly pay your mortgage and have a child they will live on your taxes and have seven children.

  19. Steve Brown says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 10:55 am

    What ridiculousness. If the early Muslims thought this then Allah’s instructions were ludicrous which makes them false. “Tap” her with a twig. Is that like throwing down the gauntlet. Some symbolic gesture to indicate displeasure? What foolishness. If the passage meant tap her lightly with a twig why doesn’t it say tap her lightly with a twig? I thought the Qur’an was supposed to be clear. More Muslim lying to non-Muslims with the stupid PC Liberals saying “D’uh…ok!”.

  20. steve says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 11:09 am

    As an Englishman I acknowledge and regret that fact that my country is in a state of actual subservience to Islam.. How long will it be before the Oxford Dictionary is ”Islamised” to the satisfaction of the Muslim Council of Britain, who else ?? So, the entry for ‘TWIG’ will read, noun, a word misused in English, erroneously believed to be related to ancient Dutch word twijg, [two] As kufr will realise, there is no history before the Koran so such claims are not only irrelevant but dangerously un-islamic. For correct meaning see Holy Koran. The description of use in chastisement of any individual branch will need immediate confirmation by Islamic scholar. Kufr are advised against any written or spoken misuse which WILL be considered contradiction of the Koran . Penalty death .

  21. Rob says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 11:03 pm

    The prophet Mohammad slugged his adolescent wife in the stomach and then ridiculed her for thinking that he wouldn’t do it. “Beat” means beat.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Mount Zion on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • James Lincoln on Islamic Republic of Iran: Turkey’s Erdogan champions Islam only as a tool to further his own interests
  • James Lincoln on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • terry sullivan on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Keith O on India: Police make first arrest for ‘love jihad’ under new law

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.