Let’s hope Emmanuel Macron’s presidential hopes suffer the same fate as those of Prime Minister Manuel Valls, who said similarly:
“Times have changed and we should learn to live with terrorism,” Valls said at the time. The comments led to the socialist being cursed and jeered in public, and played a prominent role in terminating his own hopes of a presidential run.
No Western leader should be saying that terrorism will be “part of our daily lives” or that “we should learn to live with it.” Such statements essentially mean: “We have failed as politicians to protect you. We want the Muslim vote as well, so we do not intend to change our liberal immigration policy; nor can we curtail jihadism, given who we have let into our nation, so deal with it, people, suck it up and accept our failures.” Contrast Macron’s defeatist words with his opponent Marine Le Pen:
“We must take control of our national borders to know who is coming in…mass immigration” had not been “an opportunity for France, [but] a tragedy for France.”
“French Presidential Favourite Macron: Terrorism ‘Part of Our Daily Lives for Years to Come’ After Paris Shooting”, by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, April 21, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Emmanuel Macron, the current favourite to win the French presidential elections, has described terrorism as an “imponderable problem” which will be “part of our daily lives for the years to come”.
Speaking in a French radio interview reported by The Guardian newspaper, the centre left En Marche! candidate appeared to echo former Prime Minister Manuel Valls’s controversial statements following the Nice lorry attack on Bastille Day 2016, in which a Tunisian migrant mowed down 434 men, women, and children, killing 87.
“Times have changed and we should learn to live with terrorism,” Valls said at the time. The comments led to the socialist being cursed and jeered in public, and played a prominent role in terminating his own hopes of a presidential run.
In contrast to Macron, Front National leader Marine Le Pen had been highlighting the fact that crime and security had, in her view, been “completely absent” from the presidential campaign in a live debate just minutes before news of the Kalashnikov attack broke.
“It’s a major subject that nobody has mentioned,” she complained. “We must take control of our national borders to know who is coming in. We must reorganise the intelligence services, reinforce the means at the disposal of police and gendarmes, and attack the evil at its roots – that’s to say the communitarianism and the development of Islamic fundamentalism.”
Ms. Le Pen also said she would immediately deport all foreign nationals on the terror watch list if elected, asking rivals: “Explain to me why we should take the risk of keeping them in our territory?”
In a major speech on 18 April, the 48-year-old declared that “mass immigration” had not been “an opportunity for France, [but] a tragedy for France”.
She vowed to terminate France’s membership of the borderless Schengen Zone, criticised as an “international passport-free zone for terrorists” by former Interpol chief Robert Noble, and promised citizens: “I will protect you.”…
common sense says
Sadiq Khan’s political twin eh? What a Nutless monkey.
Jayell says
We know that Khan’s ‘British’ credentials are about as convincing as a Mickey Mouse dollar bill, so you wouldn’t expect HIM to be defending Londoners properly against his own chums’ criminal antics, but the hero of this article is supposed to be a REAL Frenchman. Or have we got Vichy version 2.0 here?
Lu says
Very good comment! Vichy 2.0 – how precise.
Pong says
“Londoners” have little to complain about. Electing a moslem and expect him to be different is very stupid. During his time in office he will promoted moslems to the key positions and push sharia and moslem immigration even harder. Of cause, moslems voted for him, but he couldn’t get to the office without non-moslem vote. Those, who celebrate Brexit, forgot that UK have surrendered its independence to islam and Brexit will not change anything.
Kiel says
These utterings by French presidential candidates are utter defeatism. How can they get themselves to expose their impotence in full public? Marine Le Pen seems to be the only individual with pants on.
Walter Sieruk says
That jihad –minded Muslim who murdered the police officer,in Paris, as well as his attempted murder of the other two police officers was awful wicked and wrong. That jihadist shooter might not have had care if he even died in that heinous action of Islam terrorism. This is because he and other jihadist /Muslims are so extremely deluded and irrational because they really believed in the nonsensical, strange and far –fetched doctrine contained in the Koran, of sex-filled paradise with black eye- houris, virgins, in it for the male Muslim who dies as a “martyr” for the cause of Islam fighting in the jihad. As, this bizarre Islamic doctrine of a houris -filled place is found in the Koran in, for example, 4:54. 55:56. 78:31. So this odd and outlandish Koranic doctrine inspired many young Muslims males to commit many horrendous, ruthless, heartless and murderous actions of jihad violence. Those vicious jihadists’ massacres that occurred in Paris was most wicked and hideous. That extreme deadly evil caused by those jihadist/Muslims with their firm but blind unquestioning belief in the weird and false doctrine from the Koran of such a houris, filled paradise that had the outcome of mass murder and chaos in the city of Paris. This is a strong reminder of the wise statement written by the French philosopher, Voltaire, who wrote “As long as men continue to believe in absurdities they will continue to commit atrocities.”
Ciudadano says
The sensual paradise promised by Mohamed to his followers just shows one more time the pagan leaning of Islam and that the koran is made up of misstranslated and twisted tales and traditions plagiarized from other religions. The word houris used in the koran is a mistranslation of the arameic word for “raisin”. It was borrowed from an ancient christian tradition according to wich there are grapes in paradise because Jesus said in the Last Supper “I tell you, I will not drink from this fruit of the vine from now on until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.” (Matthew 26:29)
http://tinyurl.com/hlxusud
http://tinyurl.com/kgngsyn
Walter Sieruk says
As for that jihad murder in Paris of that police officer and the attempted murder of two other French police officer by that jihadist/Muslim. The “holy book’ of Islam, the Quran , instructs in jihad warfare in Sura 9:123. “O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you , and let them find harshness in you…” Shooting police officers in Paris, who are “disbelievers is a very effective way to show them harshness. Nevertheless there are still some who still call Islam a “peaceful religion” What a false claim. What Bull !
Walter Sieruk says
That murderous jihad shooting attack Paris, France further exposes the violent and deadly nature of Islam. Many times the jihadist members of different Islamic terror entities, as those of ISIS, have gathered together and chanted the words “We love death, they love life.” Likewise those jihadist/Muslims don’t stop with those awful words; they carry through with jihad suicide/homicide attacks. Any sane person would ask “Why do those jihad –minded Muslims have such a mindset of murderous madness?” The answer is that they obtain the way of thinking and believing from the “holy book” of Islam, the Koran. As some people call it the Qu ‘ran. For example the Koran in Sura 9:111 instructs “The believers fight in Allah’s Cause, they slay and are slain, they kill and are killed.” Therefore it may be conclude that Islam is actually a death cult. In great and wonderful contrast to the death cult which is Islam there is Christianity which is centered on Jesus and His teachings. For Jesus did not teach killing and death but taught and gave life, a good peaceful well lived life and more. For example Jesus declared “I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.” John 10:10. [K.J.V.]
Lilythewise says
If I were French I would have many words for this tool. None of them words that should be uttered in front of children though.
Jayell says
Interesting comment. What sort of ‘tool’ would he be? Foam-rubber hammer perhaps? Or might that look too threatening?
Lilythewise says
LOL!
Rufolino says
You could call him a manufactured, plastic politician, which he is par excellence !
Ciudadano says
only jihad terrorism? What about FGM or women beating or acid attacks?
Let’s continue islamic cultural enrichment of western societies. paraphrarsing mr Troudox “Time to go from tolerance to acceptance and then complete surrender.”
Weapon used in Muslim countries / 454 acid attacks in London, 74% more than the previous year
http://tinyurl.com/lu2y72x
Ed Lee says
Question: How many French troops does it take to defend Paris?
Answer: Unknown – it’s never been attempted.
miriamrove says
What a f…idiot. m
Charli Main says
Terrorism ‘Part of Our Daily Lives for Years to Come’
Yes—-because dog turds LIKE Y0U allow Muslims to behave the way they do and get away with it.
Stop pandering to Muslims. If they refuse to integrate and adapt to the society that has rehomed them–deport the scum back to Islamistan.
Check Noorish says
If we must get used with terror, it might be the time to do the same. So they can also get used with. And stop paying taxes, as long the state is no longer in charge.
IQ al Rassooli says
CAN MUSLIMS BE LOYAL CITIZENS AMONG INFIDELS?
This is very informative and everyone needs to read it from start to finish and send it on to others.
Theologically – NO. . . Because Muslims submit only to Allah – originally the supreme god of Pagan Arabia- and hence most definitely not the same as the God of Jesus, Moses or Abraham.
Religiously – NO. . . Because no other religion is accepted by Allah except Islam (Submission to Allah).
Al Imran 3: 85 “If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah) never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter he will be in the ranks of those who have lost”
Scripturally – NO. . . Because Muslims’ allegiance is to Sharia based upon Muhammad’s Quran and Sunna.
Textually – NO … Because Muhammad’s Quran is Hatemongering, Warmongering, Misogynist, Racist, Intolerant, Disloyal, Duplicitous and hence UNGODLY.
Geographically – NO. . . Because Muslims bow in reverence to Mecca in Arabia, to which they turn in prayer five times a day.
Socially – NO. . . Because a Muslim’s devotion to Islam forbids him from making friends with Christians and Jews ~
Al Mai’da 5: 51 “O ye who believe! take not the Jews [Yahood] and the Christians [Nasara] for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them…”
Al Tauba 9: 29 “Fight [qatiloo] those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His apostle nor acknowledge the religion of truth [ISLAM] (even if they are) of the People of the Book [Christians & Jews] until they pay the Jizya [onerous penalty for not being a Muslim] with willing submission and feel themselves humiliated”
Loyally – NO … Because a Muslim’s allegiance is primarily to ALL other Muslims all over the globe.
Ishaq:231 “Muslims are one ummah (community) to the exclusion of all men. Believers are friends of one another to the exclusion of all outsiders.”
Politically – No. . . Because Muslims must submit to the mullahs (spiritual Leaders), who teach equal opportunity HATRED for ALL those who are not followers of Muhammad (currently 80% of humanity called Ummat al Kuffar/ Nation of Infidels) as well as calls for the destruction of Western Civilization (Christianity).
Al Fath 48: 13 “And if any believe not in Allah and His Apostle We have prepared for those who reject Allah a Blazing Fire!
Domestically – No. . . Because Muslims are instructed to marry up to four women and to beat and scourge their wives when they disobey them
Al Nisaa 4:34 “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other and because they support them from their means. … As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct admonish them; refuse to share their beds; beat them …”
Legally – No. . . Because Muslims cannot accept the American Constitution as binding since it is not from Allah’s Sharia as well as they believe the Bible is corrupted.
Culturally- NO… Because Muslims belong to a culture that prefers Death more than Life.
Ibrahim 14: 3 “Those who love the life of this world more than the Hereafter who hinder (men) from the Path of Allah and seek therein something crooked: they are astray by a long distance”
Constitutionally – No. . . Because Sharia is the nemesis of Democracy; it does not allow for freedoms of religion, expression or belief. Democracy and Islam is an oxymoron; a state of affairs that cannot possibly co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial, autocratic or theocratic.
Spiritually – No. . . Because the Christians’ God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran’s 99 excellent attributes.
This is why Muslims in Europe and the USA are so quiet and not speaking out about all the world wide atrocities allegedly committed by so called ‘radical’ Muslims.
Not once has there been a major demonstration – whether in Europe or the USA – by the so called ‘silent majority’ Muslims expressing their revulsion at acts of terror committed by these alleged ‘radicals’ shouting out loud “NOT IN OUR NAME!”
Muhammad said: SILENCE means CONSENT!
Therefore, after much study and deliberation…. Perhaps Europeans and Americans should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in their country.
They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and good Europeans or Americans. Call it what you will, these are the FACTS based entirely in chapter and verse upon their scripture.
Humanity had better believe it. The more who understand these realities, the better it will be for humanity and their future generations.
This is NOT a clash of Civilizations but a clash of Beliefs.
FREEDOM NEVER COMES FREE.
IQ al Rassooli
Kafir & Proud!
Paul N Silas says
It’s simple, the Frog is gutless, playing the “Islam Card” to get elected.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
The reason Jihad mass murder (aka terrorism) is imponderable as Macron says is that we Infidels aren’t willing to ponder the problem. That would entail thinking and saying unthinkable things, so at most they’re thought but left unsaid. Returning millions of Moslems to Dar al-Islam is unthinkable. Without that the progression of Moslems marches forward, marked by the occasional mass murder event. That’s how they operate, so get used to it. Adapt.
Paul N Silas says
Adapt or arm yourself?
Give me Liberty, or give me death!
Ghe de la Scularie says
In Europe, honest men can’t arm. I am sure if from tomorrow europeans are free to buy guns, after tomorrow all have guns.
andra says
There are much more People today who have legal weapons than they used to. Especcially in Austra and Sweden the number of legal weapons is increasing immensely. Even in Germany which is very restrictive with legal weapons (while at the same time very generous against people with illegal ones) the numbers are significantly increasing. But here you only have the choice of the so-called “smal firearms licence” which allows you to Keep an alarm pistol on your grounds. If you want sharp weapons you have to prove that you have been trained in an official Shooting Club and must have had a minimum of training shots and so on.
Guest says
Thank you for throwing the race and giving it to Le Pen. Because we all know we want to hear our leaders openly admit to giving up and taking abuse.
davej says
Only if you have already surrendered, you idiot!
Why should we be murdered so that moronic Muslims can get their illusionary pie in the sky?
Pal says
Christine Williams,
Brilliant introduction!
A must-read aloud before French, European and American leaders.
But will they ever be willing to listen?
The answer is “no”.
“Islam-based political parties rising in Europe”:
https://www.investigativeproject.org/6038/europe-rising-islam-based-political-parties#
no_one says
A few years ago I was happy I chose to visit Russia and not Germany right before the end of communism, although I was young and didn’t appreciate it much at the time. My parents only had money for one excursion. I though it was unsafe in Russia post communism and western Europe could be visited any time. Not any more. Not safe.
Tom Thumb says
If my own father/mother/son/daughter/brother/sister/wife said what that guy said, I would campaign for his opponent.
Voytek Gagalka says
If they will elect such “president” then of course they will have terrorism as “part of their daily lives for years to come” (at least until such “president” will be removed). So, why waste precious time for such candidates? Is Hollande’s lengthy term not a waste already?
John A. Marre says
So the race is between someone who wants to bring in more Muslims to destroy France, and someone who wants to keep France from being overrun and engulfed by hordes of screaming savages who like to shoot French people and drive trucks into crowds.
Guest says
If this is not the stupidest political move, in the history of politics then I don’t know what is.
JayT says
I saw a news video clip months ago where U.S. Congressman Elijah Cummings said pretty much the same thing about we need to accept terrorism as part of our daily lives from now on.
I have tried to find the news article echoing this on the web, but it’s about as elusive to find as the video broadcast where on live TV a member of Egyptian president Morsi and his fellow Muslim Brotherhood members stated they were at war with America, but must move in secret.
bleeps says
Self MENTAL Resignation attitudes shouldn’t ever be allowed! MACRON SPEECH WILL BE ODD FROM NOW ON IF HE SLIPS THE PILL(INTENTIONS)!!!!
shoehorn says
He just lost. No-one promising more terrorism beats a patriot.
Rob says
Don’t bet too much on it…self-delusion is a powerful thing. Look at what is happening on American college campuses where students are opposing fundamental free speech. Look at “enlightened” and liberal American women marching in the name of “women power” while wearing hijab – a symbol of the sexualization, repression and exploitation of women. As others have said, there is no cure for stupid.
Mockingjay says
“The roof is on fire. We’re just gonna let it burn.
Meh.”
utis says
As I understand, most of the people not dragged to this country in slave ships, came to get away from oppression and subjugation. Any Frenchmen who vote for this goof deserve what they get. I’m not betting a big amount, but I’m betting Macron comes out dead last in the first race.
Peter says
Jihad terrorism will be “part of our daily lives for the years to come.” Really? Only if you allow, accept, and/or enable it. Jihad can be contained, rolled back, and defeated, but that requires “bon courage.”
dumbledoresarmy says
Exactly.
Got Muslims? Got Jihad.
And THAT means – fewer Muslims? – less jihad. NO Muslims? – no jihad (or, at least, none from within the gates, one still does have to take measures to prevent jihadis from raiding across the borders).
If every identifiable Mohammedan in France, beginning with all those who do not possess French citizenship or are dual citizens, was simply rounded up and deported from France, back to their country of origin, and at the same time, ALL further entry of identifiable mohammedans was STOPPED henceforward and forever, the risk of jihad would, in the long run, be reduced, because the number of Muslims inside France would be significantly reduced.
Surprise-raid and search all known mosques, beginning with those that are *known* to have dodgy associations past or present, and shut down and raze to the ground (bulldozers, or controlled demolition) ALL that turn out to have funny stuff going on – e.g. the search finds traces of explosives or dangerous chemicals or quantities of the precursors to same, or hidden safes or false floors/ walls or hidden sub-basements or tunnel entrances or weaponry or large stashes of real or counterfeit cash and/ or illegal drugs and/ or faked identity documents and/ or the fingerprints or DNA of persons on the criminal database (or that match up with DNA or fingerprints on the ‘unsolved crimes’ database)..
THAT would cut Islam in France down to size, quite a bit, I suspect. How many mosques would pass a surprise inspection? (made by army sappers and sniffer dogs and forensics experts). I’d hazard the guess. . not too many.
Remove their military bases and they would be rather more constrained in operation.
ALL French-passport-holding Muslims known to have gone off to Syria (or any other jihad hotspot), should be stripped of French citizenship forthwith. and every effort made to deny them re-entry; if they sneak back in and are caught, they get instantly deported.
Matthieu Baudin says
France will have it’s first Woman President before the United States does.
eD says
Another Spineless mainstream pip-squeak. If the French vote this fuckwit in then they are simply asking for it.
Richie says
I love Marine LePenn, but she has a snowballs chance in hell of being elected
Carolyne says
I remember similar comments made about Donald Trump.
Lu says
The statement of delusional Mr. Macron is a coin with two sides. Saying that terrorism will be “part of their daily lives for years to come” also means that the other side – battered, abused and terrorized native French peoples – will react – somehow. Whitewashing what causes such “terrorism” will only exacerbate the “years to come” – until everything flares up and explodes – in the country whose president this fool desires to be.
andra says
I´d say, Macron is rigtht. If the French vote for any other than Le Pen they will have to live with increasing jihad-terror. And even if they vote for Le Pen they will have to face more attacks as we cannot expect the Muslim invadors to leace France or even Europe on a peaceful base. We will have war in Europe whatever choice we pick.
duh swami says
G3t in line stupid, you’re next…
Carolyne says
If the French have any interest at all in saving their country, they will elect Marine Le Pen. However, they are not noted for their courage when their country is faced with danger.
mortimer says
Robert Spencer’s comment bares repeating: “No Western leader should be saying that terrorism will be “part of our daily lives” or that “we should learn to live with it.” Such statements essentially mean: “We have failed as politicians to protect you.”
POLITICIANS ARE FAILING TO DO THEIR JOB OF COMBATTING POLITICAL ISLAM, the IDEOLOGY that fuels jihad.
POLITICAL ISLAM is the enemy. Without destroying POLITICAL ISLAM, the fight will continue. All Western governments should invest in a PHILOSOPHICAL and IDEOLOGICAL WARFARE against POLITICAL ISLAM.
Rob says
Anyone know what this jerk is winking at?