“Half the work that is done in the world is to make things appear what they are not.” –E.R.Beadle
Recently there was a terrorist attack in London, England. Police confirmed there were five dead and forty injured. The attacker, a devout Muslim, was shot by police, but not before he stabbed to death one of the officers on the scene. In a statement to the British public, the Muslim Council of Britain announced, “We condemn this attack,” but that “it is still too early to speculate on the motives” – as if there were any question as to what were the terrorist’s motives. As if those motives did not exist in the Muslim world.
We now expect after every Islamic terrorist attack to hear the disclaimer that it had nothing to do with Islam, and that the peaceful message of Islam was “hijacked” by the terrorists. The Western world is by now becoming inured to the slaughter of innocents by Muslim madmen. And more often than not, the victims of this slaughter are Muslim. That this is happening under the gaze of an insouciant Western world says everything about why Muslim fundamentalists are invigorated and believe a universal Islamic caliphate is a tangible objective. But it says even more about how delusional the Western world is for believing that the encroachments upon our democratic freedoms was not a direct consequence of accommodating the Islamic supremacists who walk among us.
It has been discovered that the Jordanian cleric Sheikh Muhammad bin Musa Al Nasr, an invited guest of the Dar Al-Arqam Mosque in Montreal’s Saint-Michel neighborhood, delivered a sermon there in which he quoted a verse from a hadith demanding of Islam’s faithful, “O Muslim, O servant of Allah, O Muslim, O servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.” The CBC reports that “the president of the Muslim Council of Montreal, Salam Elmenyawi, wants to know why the imam was invited.” Apparently the Muslim Council of Montreal is not privy to the many anti-Jewish verses in the Quran and its hadiths. Apparently this same Muslim Council of Montreal had no prior knowledge of Sheikh Muhammad bin Musa Al Nasr’s scheduled appearance, or of the type of anti-Jewish message he must certainly be famous for. CBC reports that Imam Ziad Asali of the Association of Islamic Charitable Projects was “mystified” as why this particular imam was invited “to come and give a sermon and spread this hatred in Montreal against any community.” Apparently here is yet another Muslim organization unaware of Islam’s anti-Jewish rhetoric. Let me guess: the Quran’s definition of Jews as “the sons of apes and swine” is not really anti-Jewish. Perhaps the Quran is referring only to Jewish Zionists, because we all know how particularly evil they can be.
Imam Asali reassures “infidel” Canadians that for any cleric to “use the themes of the Prophet to spread hatred is actually something that is disrespectful towards the Prophet himself.” Forget how disrespectful (and injurious) such themes are to the Canadian Jewish community; he wants us to overlook that and be more concerned about how such themes are “disrespectful towards the Prophet himself.” The imam went on to say that there are “mosques in Montreal that embrace a more extremist message.” Really? This tells me that the AICP is not concerned with Canadian “extremists,” only Jordanian “extremists.” Perhaps Imam Asali is suggesting that non-Muslim Canadians should also not be concerned with Canadian “extremists” in our midst, but only with Jordanian “extremists.” Canadians are to carry on as if there were no terrorists living among us.
Tacitus wrote, “Candour and generosity, unless tempered by due moderation, lead to ruin.” There is not a more definite description of political correctness than this. The Western media, the collective that gave birth to the very idea of political correctness, exalts itself as the sole authority on what is to be deemed good and what should be condemned as evil; all other points of view be damned. Therefore, all Muslim immigrants are good, border security measures against possible Islamic terrorist infiltration bad; CNN faultlessly honest, Breitbart and Fox racist and xenophobic; Islam “hijacked”; jihadists merely misunderstood, their detractors nothing but shameless populists and Islamophobes.
The New York Times, in a recent article about Muslim refugees avoiding official border stations and crossing into Canada from the United States illegally, said this can be “freighted with emotion, happen quickly and can seem almost procedural, occurring over and over every day in recent weeks.” No mention of the fact that many Canadians are furious about this totally unacceptable situation – a situation condoned by a globalist Prime Minister who is more concerned with his personal appearance than with the security and deteriorating national identity of the country and the citizens he has sworn by oath to protect.
The list of contradictions between the real world and the world fabricated by those who work tirelessly every day to “make things appear what they are not” is long. This force of untruth is growing stronger every day. It was “us” against “them” long ago, only nobody seemed to notice. Now both sides of this conflict are completely entrenched, one side for good, the other for evil; one side for democracy, for freedom, the other for tyranny and fascism. In his recent Front Page Mag article, “The Civil War Is Here,” the ever-prescient Daniel Greenfield writes: “The left is a treasonous movement. The Democrats became a treasonous organization when they fell under the sway of a movement that rejects our system of government, its laws and its elections. Now their treason is coming to a head. They are engaged in a struggle for power against the government. That’s not protest. It’s not activism. The old treason of the sixties has come of age. A civil war has begun.”
Benedict says
“O Muslim, O servant of Allah, O Muslim, O servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.” –
Islam is the extended, relentless pursuit of a scapegoat. No wonder it found the Jews who invented the concept and perfected it thus causing unquenchable envy in the Muslim camp. –
Mimetic desire breeds terror.
john spielman says
what? the Jews DIDNOT “invent ” the term “scapegoat” when applied to themselves. The concept is that the sin of the people was transferred to the goat who was then set free in the wilderness. It illustrated the concept of the forgiveness of God, after the blood sacrifice of the another animal- which would be manifest generations later in the life and death of Jesus ” the lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world”
islam sanctifies( makes holy) the concept of LYING to unbelievers as a way to gain advantage over them. It illustrates the demonic evil origins of islam which proves that allah is NOT God but Satan! as allah is said by muslims to be the “greatest deceiver”
Benedict says
John Spielman: I know that the Jews didn’t “invent” the scapegoat and that also goes for the scapegoat that was not “themselves”, but I am putting it a little curious.
Anyhow, if Muslims – and indeed the entire human race – would appropriate the “lamb of God” you proclaim, terror, hate and resentment would dissipate as a mist before the Sun, so I appreciate your comment.
Chris Newcombe says
Would you mind explaining your comment.
Carolyne says
The bible says, and I think that most Christians believe, that a snake spoke to Eve, telling her to eat an apple. I believe that a talking rock is as likely as a talking snake.
I do not believe a rock will talk to a Muslim and I do not believe a snake will speak to any human.
RationalVoice says
The God concept is just a hangover from a less knowledgeable past (I didn’t want to use the world ignorant in case it offended someone) .Everything which follows from that ridiculous, stupid belief (oh be offended then !!!) is false and a delusion handed down from parents to children and brainwashed into them by religious schools and churches.
We have seen the results of this down through the centuries as an excuse for war and other horrible practices. Today we have the Islamic threat to our lives and liberties. It difficult to shake off this religious programming even for established Atheists/Rationalists. Science cannot be programmed into people in the same way because it can be complex and does not offer the simple and simplistic “certainties” of the ancient religions such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam. But come on people, talking snakes and rocks, flying horses, virgin births, heaven, hell and all the other codswallop. No one in 2017 on planet Earth should still be believing and misusing their wonderfully evolved brain like that !!!
Nigel GFF says
First rate piece Mr Devolin.
The alchemical treatment of Islam by the self appointed arbiters of ‘correct speak’ (I mean non-hate speak), is quite perplexing given the immutable nature of the words transmitted via the ‘perfect’ conduit Muhammad. These folk, our ‘elites’, wish to suggest, nay demand, that the text is golden not base. They insist we are criminal in our base assertions that a correct reading, an examination of history and even archaeological evidence, can lead to a greater understanding of the threat that Islam adherents represent.
There is no pot of gold at the end of the globalists’ rainbow and no billions thrown down their wishing-well will ever make it appear so.
“All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.”(Tolkien, LoR).
Westman says
Imam Asali reassures “infidel” Canadians that for any cleric to “use the themes of the Prophet to spread hatred is actually something that is disrespectful towards the Prophet himself.”
If any proof is needed that doublethink is a product of Islam – here it is. If the theme of actions actually said or performed by the “perfect” Muhammad are disgraceful then they should be ignored rather than bring “slander” upon the Prophet, however, all good Muslims should – “Follow The Example Of The Prophet.”
That some Muslims break this doublethink and choose to actually follow in Muhammad’s footsteps is no surprise. The dangerous part of this doublethink instablity is that it can be influenced in both directions as when a genocide occurs and we read, “We were neighbors for generations, respecting our different religions, and then they started killing us.”
Angemon says
Indeed.
Politicianphobia says
Onward Christian soldiers
Jeanette says
If the leftists/Marxists want to commit suicide by allowing Muslims to kill them, it could be argued that it is their right to have themselves killed.
But when they arrange for others to be killed by Muslims, that is murder.
davulek says
Western denial of Islam’s nature and intent is reminiscent of the denial of some German Jews under the Nazi’s. Those Jews could not believe that anyone would attempt to wipe out an entire segment of their own countries population.
They were obviously wrong. So is the west.
afrostreetwise says
Davulek “Those Jews could not believe that anyone would attempt to wipe out an entire segment of their own countries population.
They were obviously wrong.” I really can’t blame those Nanzi error Jews. If you have never seen it happen before, Most people of ordinary sanity would not believe it can happen. i still find it hard to grasp how any human being can devise a scheme of such evil magnitude and especially, how he convinced so many people into the scheme.