• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Muslim cleric: Wife-beating “is more of a psychological beating, the purpose of which is to humiliate the wife”

Apr 16, 2017 2:15 pm By Robert Spencer

“The beatings must not be hard.” The problem with that is that “hard” is a subjective judgment.

The mandate to beat one’s wife is in the Qur’an:

“Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34

Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?” — Aisha (Sahih Muslim 2127)

“Kuwaiti Cleric on Wife Beating: Not Hard and Not on the Face,” MEMRI, January 31, 2017:

In a fatwa session posted online, Kuwaiti cleric Othman Al-Khamis cited the Quranic verse pertaining to wife-beating, and said: “The beatings must not be hard. It is more of a psychological beating, the purpose of which is to humiliate the wife.” He further explained that “he shouldn’t break her bones, and he shouldn’t beat her on the face.” A video of his statements was posted on his YouTube channel on January 31.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Kuwait, Muslim clerics, Sharia, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Othman Al-Khamis


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. VRWC member77 says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 2:46 pm

    “psychological “?………….from a previous post, how is this “psychological”?

    *****Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Salik) – Classic Manual for Islamic Law ******

    m 10.12 – DEALING WITH A REBELIOUS WIFE , page 540:

    “When a husband notices signs of rebelliousness in his wife whether in words, as when she answers him coldly when she used to do so politely. or he asks her to come to bed and she refuses. contrary to her usual habit; or whether in acts, as when he finds her averse to him when she was previously kind and cheerful). he warns her in words without keeping from her or hitting her, for it may be that she has an excuse. The warning could be to tell her, “Fear Allah concerning the rights you owe to me,” or it could be to explain that rebelliousness nullifies his obligation to support her and give her a turn amongst other wives, or it could be to inform her, “Your obeying me is religiously obligatory”. If she commits rebelliousness, he keeps from sleeping (0: and having sex) with her without words, and MAY HIT HER, but not in a way that injures her, meaning he may not (A: bruise her,) break bones, wound her, or cause blood to flow. (0: It is unlawful to strike another’s face.) HE MAY HIT HER whether she is rebellious only once or whether more than once, though a weaker opinion holds that he may not hit her unless there is repeated rebelliousness.

    • Michael says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 4:14 pm

      VRWS, I hadn’t heard of this book. Ordering it. Thank you. Apparently this is ‘the book’ given to converts? So they know the lay of the land? Precisely how to live their lives to avoid death, beatings, and other tortures demanded by the Koran?

      • The Confessions says

        Apr 16, 2017 at 4:19 pm

        Hi Michael, I found a copy online but it’s better to have the real thing. ‘Umdat al-Salik is one of the classical manuals referred to for Sunni Muslims, at least for the Shafi’i school.

        I wrote about this issue recently in case you’re interested: https://theconfessionsweb.wordpress.com/2017/04/14/hizb-ut-tahrir-wife-beating-and-the-confusion-of-silma-ihram/

      • gravenimage says

        Apr 16, 2017 at 6:34 pm

        Michael, the Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Salik) is the classic compendium of Sunni law. It is a very grim read, but key to understanding how Islam works in action.

        Thanks to VRWC member77 for his citation.

        • Michael says

          Apr 16, 2017 at 7:41 pm

          Thank you, gravenimage. I’ve ordered it. Very interested to read the manual itself, and find my jaw dropped to the floor many times more.

    • Libby says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 4:15 pm

      Fk rite off!

      • VRWC member77 says

        Apr 16, 2017 at 7:48 pm

        Libby,

        Just in case, my intention was not to say that psychological abuse toward one’s wife was ok where physical abuse wasn’t. I was just trying to point out the absurd leap this cleric was making by saying beating your wife is actually a “psychological” beating as opposed to an actual physical beating.

        I don’t believe in ANY type of abuse towards a spouse, psychological or otherwise. Islam is such a perverted cult and sometimes it sucks a person into a discussion such as wife beating as if there’s actually some rational discussion to be had on such an outrageous behavior.

        On a side note, speaking of wives, I agree with my wife (who is also my soul mate) that Pamela Geller is a modern day Harriet Tubman with her unassuming and discrete work of rescuing girls who become targets of muslim honor killings in the West.

        • gravenimage says

          Apr 16, 2017 at 9:02 pm

          Great post.

        • BC says

          Apr 17, 2017 at 4:09 am

          I think the word he is groping for is symbolic rather than psychological

        • gravenimage says

          Apr 17, 2017 at 2:07 pm

          BC, if this is intended to humiliate, then I do believe he meant psychological. Something that humiliates is not just symbolic.

    • BC says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 4:17 am

      Everything in Islam is subjected to their relationship with the so called ‘allah’ nothing else matters especially ‘man made law’

  2. Guest says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    Good to know. They just create wounds that never heal

    • StacyGirl says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 9:00 pm

      Genital mutilation, beatings. Marriage is a contract for these reprobateslike buying cattle. Marriage in Islam is not based on mutual respect. There’s no Qu’ranuc verse instructing a man to liove his wife as he does his own flesh. Christian marriages unite a man and a woman as one. Not possible to join one Muslim man to his 4 wives and concubines as one. He is over one or more wives and in charge of them.

  3. mccode says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 2:59 pm

    I’m glad he cleared that up for all of us.

    There I was, so confused about the ‘correct’ purpose of wife beating. This makes it all so very understandable and acceptable now.

    • mccode says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 3:00 pm

      Not

  4. Gen Jones says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 4:02 pm

    Islam is just a power relationship between the oppressor and the oppressed, whether it’s the Muslim majority needing to humiliate the minority Christians and Jews or the husband needing to humiliate his wife. You can’t feel love for someone you feel the need to humiliate. You feel contempt. And then the humiliated in turn feel contempt for the oppressor. There’s no trust, no partnership, no spontaneity just fear.

    • Libby says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 4:16 pm

      Well put!

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 6:41 pm

      Very important observation, Gen.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 6:41 pm

      Yes.

      At the core of Islam is the adoration of raw amoral brute Force.

      Willaim Palgrave saw that in the 19th century – he observed that Islamic ‘theology’ was “a pantheism of Force”.

  5. duh swami says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 4:26 pm

    One mans ‘beat her lightly’, s another mans bloody mess…

    It’s better to humiliate her, brow beat her, make her feel like sht..especially in public…She will love you for it…

    • Michael says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 4:34 pm

      Funny how ‘love’ isn’t a concept in Islam.

      the purpose is to humiliate her — which should beg the question why do you humiliate someone you love? to which we answer … you don’t. which is followed by there is no love in Islam. A desire for death, perhaps. A ‘love’ for everything evil.

      Love? I can’t see that it exists anywhere within Islam. Hate, darkness, evil, yes. Love? No evidence of it.

      • Manny says

        Apr 16, 2017 at 5:17 pm

        Excellent point.

      • gravenimage says

        Apr 16, 2017 at 7:13 pm

        Islam is a loveless creed. FGM, child marriage, forced marriage, polygamy, wife beating, summary divorce of women (the “Triple Talaq”), and “Honor Killing”–so none of this should surprise.

  6. Paula says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 4:51 pm

    Oh, and that is supposed to be that much better? Hey idiot, it’s called domestic violence and no matter how much you try to pretty up ugliness, it is still ugly and still abusive. Let’s try it on you and see how you feel about it.

    • Michael says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 3:10 am

      Paula, yes, wouldn’t that be the trick? Women, you are free to beat your husbands for any reason, at any time. Just not ‘too hard,’ don’t ‘break bones’ (internal injuries acceptable), no ‘hitting on the face,’ but other sensitive body parts are fair game!

  7. Manny says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 5:16 pm

    The beatings will continue until morale is improved. That’s not a joke in Islam. That’s reality.

    • Libby says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 6:02 pm

      Yip yr right. Equality does not exist in Islam. Sad on another level.

  8. Libby says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 5:59 pm

    Good women are obidient …. REAL men want a woman who can be their equal – not an obedient servant.
    Away n pull flowers ya spangle!

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 2:06 pm

      These are men who enjoy torturing and killing animals. It is not reasonable to expect them to be at any higher level in other areas.

  9. Frank Anderson says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 6:08 pm

    I have seen a substantial number of life-long marriages, many of them Christian and several Jewish, where wives were treated with honor and respect every day. I watched my uncle open every door for his wife of 50+ years unless he was on crutches or loaded with groceries. Only a gutless, ignorant coward would abuse his wife, or a raging maniac abuse her husband.

    One who encourages this evil behavior has no place in civilized society. Neither does any who follow this teaching. Whatever it takes to get out of this living hell is better than tolerating the torture. I have seen that too. Please remember the 2 Lessons of the Exodus, 1) God does not want ANY of his children to live in any form of slavery (and we are all given the choice to be God’s Children) and 2) Things change (No matter how good they start, things change).

    • Michael says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 6:15 pm

      Islam is not, as know, civilized society. It is barbarian. To live as a woman in Islam, is to live as a slave. It is the antithesis of everything we stand for. The story of your uncle is a good one, a reminder, and an inspiration to always treat women in those ways, with respect and kindness and love.

      • Carolyne says

        Apr 17, 2017 at 10:51 am

        Husbands and wives, too, should treat each other with respect and kindness and love.

        • Jeanette says

          Apr 17, 2017 at 2:11 pm

          Love is a four letter word to Muslims.

          How can people who, as an entire people, hate dogs love anything?

      • Jeanette says

        Apr 17, 2017 at 2:09 pm

        As one Danish man said in response to Muslim men raping Danish schoolgirls:

        Muslims are not civilized enough to live in civilized countries.

        Sadly, it seems that civilized countries’ “leaders” either aren’t smart enough to see that, or are intentionally allowing the attacks and murders of their own people.

        • Michael says

          Apr 17, 2017 at 10:48 pm

          Jeanette, I think you and I both see it as much more the case that the ‘leaders’ of these countries are letting in the hordes for the purposes of destruction. I just can’t accept that any leader, of any country, has gotten to that place without being fully aware of what is going on. Some may resist, and are. The real resistance is going to come from ‘we the people.’ And it is underway. The awareness of what Islam really is, is spreading. I don’t care what mainstream media does or says. Word is getting out more and more. Truth is getting out.

          As for civilized? Islam reduces people to a very primal, brutal, violent state. The very worst of human nature, or somehow pure evil which replaces human nature, I’m not sure which. it is demonic, evil without limits.

    • Karen says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 7:09 pm

      Agree! This *is* evil behavior and has no place in civilized society.

  10. Oliver says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 6:24 pm

    Many years ago, I knew a woman who had been abused verbally and psychologically by her parents and siblings ( the siblings with their parents permission and egging them on).

    She told me, that perhaps it would have been better if they JUST sexually abused her,, because that would ended (ie. the sessions of abuse) rather then the verbal and psychological which could and did go on for hours.

    (When I knew her, she had not seen or spoken to her siblings in well over ten years; wanted no contact with them; and could not ahve cared if they lived or died- but would have preferred the latter, with them having pain and suffering).

    • Michael says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 7:29 pm

      Thanks for sharing that about your friend, Oliver.

      We too often think of abuse as physical, which is obviously is and can be.

      emotional, verbal abuse can be even more brutal, in that it can absolutely crush a person’s spirit — who that person is. And as your friend pointed out, verbal abuse and emotional abuse are a constant attack on who a person is. There is no safety. Over time, you become not exactly paranoid, but extremely sensitive and wary about when the next ‘hit’ will come.

      To be a woman in Islam? It is abuse from birth. Of course I don’t indict every family, and suggest that there is no love or kindness. But the tendencies, nature and right as they are, toward kindness and love, are crushed by the Koran. The Koran despises love and kindness. It loves and embraces brutality without any limits.

      The constant abuse of women in Islam, breaks the spirits of most of them. A few may escape. Why they have the strength to do so, I don’t know. Nor do I know why a few women escape from abusive husbands, and most stay with the abuser, or find another. with one’s spirit broken, one is basically dead. To defend oneself becomes impossible. There is a point of no return, I think, where it is not possible to reject it. Especially in Islam, where there is ZERO support for a woman. She is truly alone, and to stand up for herself, will likely get her killed, or beaten even worse.

      There are many, seemingly endless, reasons to reject Islam. The brutality it shows to women — and to children — should be all any civilized person would need to know, to go, Not for us. Not her. Not now. Not ever.

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 2:43 pm

      Sexual abuse is almost always accompanied by physical and psychological abuse.

  11. gravenimage says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 6:29 pm

    Muslim cleric: Wife-beating “is more of a psychological beating, the purpose of which is to humiliate the wife”
    ………………….

    Oh, well–if it’s just intended to humiliate, it’s A-OK…sarc/off

    Compare and contrast with the Bible:

    Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for her
    –Ephesians 5:25

    In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.
    –Ephesians 5:28

    • Karen says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 7:05 pm

      Beautiful!

      • gravenimage says

        Apr 16, 2017 at 7:21 pm

        Thank you, Karen.

      • Oliver says

        Apr 16, 2017 at 8:27 pm

        In Genesis, there is a phrase, where G-d tells Abraham, “listen to your wife”.

        Some people have told me that that is the truest and wisest line in the entire Torah (Old Testament) in their view. (I am long divorced, so no opinion on that matter).

        However,I do listen to and respect the views of women. s my sister once (probably more than once) told me, women and men can look at the same object- the same everything- and come away with different views and interpretations. (So can people of the same gender).

        OFF TOPIC BUT INTERESTING:

        Some years ago, in New York City, there was a dermatologist, whose wife was always into various cultural venues. Most of which her husband, the dermatologist, had no interest in.

        One Sunday, a museum was having an exhibit of photos of people.

        The wife dragged the husband to it. He looked at one particular photo , of an elderly man. he looked for the name of the photographer, and asked for a phone number of the photographer.

        When they got home, the doctor called the photographer. The doctor asked, “the photo in the museum of the elderly man. Do you know who it is. This is not a crank call. I am a dermatologist- Dr X– (his information). There is a mark on his cheek. I don’t like the looks of it. Take him to a good dermatologist.” The man in the photo was the photographer’s father-in-law. The mark turned out to be a malignancy.

        The dermatologist saw the skin blemish. Other people saw a photo of an older man.

        Interpretations.

        • Michael says

          Apr 16, 2017 at 8:40 pm

          Very, very interesting, Oliver.

          What we ‘see’ changes with every person. We often see what we are looking for, or are trained to see, or are ‘told’ to see. Some very interesting experiments — I experienced one myself — where we were told what to look for. We concentrated so hard on what to see in this video (how many times two fellows bounced the ball back and forth between them), that we literally did not see a man in a monkey suit cross the stage right in front of them.

          I had to watch the video 3x to finally ‘see’ the man in the monkey suit. I have never forgotten that.

          When we are told what we to look for by authority — and this was an ‘experiment,’ a game, at a seminar I had gone to — then we literally are blind to other things. I was astounded by it then, and still am today.

          re men and women — we are far more different than we are like. Each of the sexes offers incredibly important gifts to the world.

          I had always wished my wife had listened to ME … but she refused! the complexities of the sexes, the differences, are quite astonishing. Unfortunately, men expect women to see things as men do, and vice-versa.

          Perhaps on point, when people are conditioned — by mass media, universities, and churches themselves — to see Islam as a religion of peace, then that is ‘all’ that they can see. Even if murders and rapes and brutality are right there in front of them, they have been told, by ‘authority,’ what to see — and literally cannot see the brutality that is literally in front of them.

          The mass conditioning of people has been going on since always — print, then radio, now tv and the internet. It plays a huge role in people NOT seeing what Islam is, even though it literally is right in front of us.

        • gravenimage says

          Apr 17, 2017 at 2:53 pm

          Interesting. I think the main point is that no matter how different–or how alike–men and women are, that we should treat each other with respect, and that in loving relationships most of all.

    • Carolyne says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 11:06 am

      “Women should be silent in church,”

      • gravenimage says

        Apr 17, 2017 at 2:57 pm

        Women are certainly not forced to be silent in most churches.

        In Islam, most women are not even allowed to worship with men, and usually have to enter by a side door.

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 2:14 pm

      Islam and Christianity are opposites. And deliberately so, I suspect.

  12. mortimer says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 9:22 pm

    ‘HUMILIATE’ … that’s the KEY WORD in Islam. Islam HUMILIATES women and dirty kafirs constantly until they SUBMIT to Muslim males.

    HUMILIATION (and how to avoid it) is the underlying purpose of most of SHARIA LAW… a primitive DESERT CODE of 7th-century Bedouins.

    Sharia law’s BACKWARDNESS has no place in the modern world, especially its HUMILIATION.

  13. jewdog says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 9:23 pm

    Since Islam was probably invented in order to justify and regulate the Arab conquests. It’s likely that wife beating pertained to female captives who became “wives”, but were really just sex slaves.
    True Story:
    One day my wife was doing the laundry when she discovered a piece of paper in my pocket with “Linda Lou” written on it. I hastily explained that she knew that I played the horses, and that Linda Lou was a horse, and so she calmed down. Later the next week, she snuck up on me and clobbered me with a frying pan. Dazed, I asked her what that was for. She yelled: “Your horse called!”

    • Michael says

      Apr 16, 2017 at 9:31 pm

      jewdog, lol … thank you for a very hearty laugh!!

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 3:27 pm

      I think Muslims have beaten their wives as well as their sex slaves from the beginning. After all, the “Prophet” struck his child bride and approved of his Companions beating their wives, as well.

  14. Stan Lee says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 9:29 pm

    When Muslim males employ “their right” of wife-beating, predicated upon the inferiority complex of the “husband wife-beater,” the wife who is raised from childhood to expect it and not resist it, or it can lead to worse. She still is the victim who only knows she must absorb the beating with no inkling of how long, how severe, it will be.
    The Muslim male obviously needs a female victim or multiple female victims, all because he is inferior no matter how Islam puffs him up. It is very questionable whether he really knows the difference between treating a wife with gentility or raping to assure himself of his masculinity. Conquest is the theme of existence in Islam and beating a female or raping a female are both acts of conquest.

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 2:16 pm

      It’s evil behavior, and there is no excuse it.

  15. Millard Stanford Brown Bunson says

    Apr 16, 2017 at 11:58 pm

    The ‘you can’t break the bones’ thing has always been a major concern of mine. Rupturing the internal organs, okay. Breaking the bones, Mo Mo No No. got it.

  16. jayell says

    Apr 17, 2017 at 1:12 am

    In UK law (and elsewhere) any kind of physical assault is a criminal offence unless it can be shown to be a necessary act of self-defence. End of story. Likewise, in the UK at least, any threat of physical violence, verbal or othewise, if witnessed by a third party in spoken or written form, can theoretically end up in court as a case of ‘threatening behaviour’. You should note that the law does not allow for any exceptions on grounds of gender IN EITHER DIRECTION. So that puts any Islamic ‘legal’ advice involving this sort of thing right OUTSIDE the law, in the UK at least.

    So if it’s agreed that the.male of the species does not have any licence to.commit acts of violence on the opposite gender, or make threats thereto, perhaps we might now see a corresponding courtesy from.the current Western female towards the male? Or would that contravene her apparently-assumed ‘special.status”?

    • Frank Anderson says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 2:23 am

      Jayell, please tell us whether this law is enforced?

      How many laws are “on the books” but not enforced everywhere around the world? If the police don’t take the calls and file the charges; if the prosecutors don’t bring the charges in court; if the courts don’t try and convict the charges, the law makes no difference and gives no help.

      Look at the joke the US gov’t makes of drug laws by failing to enforce them in states making drugs “legal”. Article 6 Clause 2 of the US Constitution says that states are bound by Federal law, not the other way around. But states are defying the Constitution while the Feds sit back. State officials should be going to prison by the bus load. Is Sharia compliant “wife beating” another case where the “law” looks the other way?

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 2:18 pm

      No Muslim honor killings that are gotten away with there?

      How nice.

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 2:21 pm

      What do you suppose the stats are regarding men being beaten, abused and murdered by western women, and women being beaten, abused and murdered by Muslim men?

      I’m not a gambler but I know which situation I would bet on as being much more common than the other.

  17. mortimer says

    Apr 17, 2017 at 3:58 am

    Kuwaiti cleric Othman Al-Khamis wears a medieval desert Bedouins costume, sitting on a golden throne, teaching medieval Bedouin law.

    When will these BACKWARD ARABS get it? WE HAVE LEARNED A FEW THINGS SINCE THE 7th CENTURY!

    We have learned that most of the things people ASSUMED in 7th century Arabia WERE WRONG!

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 2:24 pm

      And whoever helped Mohammed set up Islam knew that that would be the case several hundred years later.

      So polygamy was built in so that they could outbreed us, and taqiyya was commanded to keep us ignorant of what they really are until it’s too late for us to stop them.

      • dumbledoresarmy says

        Apr 18, 2017 at 2:55 am

        It isn’t polygyny but forced-breeding of women from first menarche to menopause that multiplies Muslims.

        Because roughly even numbers of boys and girls are born in each cohort. Fertility rate refers to how many children, on average, every female in a society has.

        One man and 1000 women, if each woman only has two kids, will have no more children that 500 men, each with just one wife, who each father two kids per wife.

        But what happens in a polygynous society is that a minority of the men ‘corner’ most of the women, which means that a lot of the men can’t find wives… unless they go next door and *steal* them (ie. it’s about creating an unstable society with a large pool of lonesome hound dawgs who can be used as cannon fodder, with the lure of next door’s females as the reward for warfare). A polygynous society is therefore parasitical on and wars against its neighbours, because it never has enough females to go round. IF it is *prevented* from stealing females from its neighbours, then it will only have more babies than its monogamous neighbours if its *women* have more babies per woman.
        And there’s something else… if a polygynous society is UNABLE to pinch girls from next door so that all its men can have a wife or wives, then lots of its men DON’T get to reproduce. Which means that the children in each successive generation represent fewer and fewer male genetic lines; the society becomes more and more genetically homogenous. Meanwhile, the monogamous society next door – if resolutely defending its women from being stolen by the stupid polygynists – maintains a healthy level of genetic variety, because there, most of the male lines get a chance to perpetuate themselves.

        If the Infidel world were to separate itself cleanly and permanently from the dar al Islam, and deny dar al Islam access to modern medicine and stop selling them food and technology, and grimly and resolutely defend the boundaries of the dar al Harb against all attempts by mohammedans to ‘cheat’ by stealing fresh genetic material (that is: our women and kids), then… in the space of a few generations, the mohammedan world would implode. It wouldn’t be able to feed itself. And its habit of killing off and in all sorts of ways abusing and killing its women – which helps exacerbate the ‘girl-drought’ already caused by polygyny – would mean that it would have fewer and fewer women to force-breed, in the first place. And it would be growing more and more dangerously inbred.

        • dumbledoresarmy says

          Apr 18, 2017 at 2:58 am

          Sorry. Correction – One man and 1000 women, if each woman only has two kids, will have no more children that 500 men, each with just one wife, who each father two kids per wife, should have been “One man and a caliph-style harem of 1000 women, if each woman only has two kids, will have no more children that 1000 men, each with just *one* wife, who each father two kids per wife.”

          It’s just that in the first case you have 1000 women who have two babies each, but those 2000 babies all have the same father. In the second case you also get 2000 babies, but they represent 1000 different male lines.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Apr 18, 2017 at 8:15 am

          DDA, with your correction you are correct. The underlying result is to create a large group of males who have no wives available; who therefore must go outside the society to find and take their companions, or become homosexual, which is punishable under Islam by death. Celibacy is hardly an option where sex is so much a basic part of the forbidden, and also so much of the natural process of continuing the “species”. Hormones win!

          Consider the impact of selective abortion of females, which among other things tells women they should have never been born. That also creates a large group of males who have no females available, similarly setting the stage for conquest.

          What kind of evil strives to unbalance an entire population?

  18. AleX says

    Apr 17, 2017 at 9:06 am

    When feminists voice their outrage vis-a-vis islamic impression of women, crickets have field day.

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 2:25 pm

      The feminist movement is not about women; it’s about power and control.

      They wouldn’t allow abortions of female babies otherwise.

  19. Florida Jim says

    Apr 17, 2017 at 10:12 am

    How ignorant must anyone be to want to humiliate their wife? This is straight from Satan and we should send all muslims home before Thursday.

  20. Danny says

    Apr 17, 2017 at 10:24 am

    One of my neighbours, who is a muslim beat his second wife so bad that she had bandage over her head and was in the hospital for a few days. He disappeared after she filed a police complaint, later she divorced him and this chap is on to his third marriage. I’m sure he didn’t watch this video, if he had, his second(ex) wife would instead have had a poke or two from the sewak twig, unlucky for her.

  21. Jeanette says

    Apr 17, 2017 at 1:58 pm

    And of course, any of the 90% of Muslim women who have been genitally mutilated is really UPSET when that nasty, smelly, gonads-on-the-hoof monster won’t share her bed.

    It’s so much fun to be in agony due to what is left after her mutilation procedure.

    Right.

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 3:36 pm

      Jeanette, the problem is that if a Muslim “banishes his wife to beds apart” she cannot enjoy it, because she knows it is a precursor to his beating her.

      • Frank Anderson says

        Apr 17, 2017 at 4:42 pm

        GI, what is being described, sadly with great accuracy, is living hell. Wafa Sultan, MD, gave an eyewitness account in her book A God Who Hates. Best wishes and great respect always.

  22. eagle says

    Apr 17, 2017 at 8:20 pm

    How does this pompous religion of peace get a pass for assault and battery. This is against the American core beliefs, the constitution of America the only law of the land,. Islam was banned from the USA in 1952, but Obama doesn’t want the American people to know that nor does he respect or uphold US law. The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 revised the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, and nationality for the United States. That act, which became Public Law 414, established both the law and the intent of Congress regarding the immigration of Aliens to the US and remains in effect today. Among the many issues it covers, and in particular, found in Chapter 2 Section 212, is the prohibition of entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by “force, violence, or other unconstitutional means.”
    This, by its very definition, rules out Islamic Immigration to the United
    States, but this law is being ignored by the White House. Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the US government, the Constitution, and the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life’s guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and it’s form of government. The American people need to know there is a censorship of the migration of the Muslim body to the United States. The Wahhabi Invasion of America is alive and well and will be the end of the American core beliefs, the basic Judaeo-Christian beliefs. I could hitch hike 15 miles to a farm to work in the fields without fear of being raped or abused. We cannot do this today!!

    • Michael says

      Apr 17, 2017 at 8:43 pm

      eagle, thank you for the specific legal references. these are very good to know.

  23. Lilythewise says

    Apr 17, 2017 at 8:39 pm

    This Cleric is a bold faced liar. Islam permits wife beating and other injustices against women.

  24. D3F1ANT says

    Apr 18, 2017 at 10:36 am

    And then the Liberals will tell us we’re all equal and that all cultures deserve the same respect. It’s a sick joke. Islam is nothing but a horde of cavemen. They don’t deserve the respect of the civilized world. They need to join the rest of the world here in modernity!

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.