Not all the defendants have Muslim names; the two with Sikh names and the one other name could be converts to Islam, or non-Muslim degenerates who got in on the action. The other 26 are Muslim names, including two (hijabbed, and hence unmolested, cf. Qur’an 33:59) women who apparently helped the men use and destroy these non-Muslim girls.
Why would they do that? Perhaps because in Islamic law, it is normal: the seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or whom their right hands possess, for they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)
It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)
The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
Iraqi Ayatollah Al-Haeri said in April 7, 2016 that a man could offer slave girls to a friend for sex.
The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction.
“29 people in court over 170 charges of sexual exploitation of 18 children,” by Richard Hartley-Parkinson, Metro.co.uk, April 13, 2017:
Twenty nine people have appeared in court facing a total of more than 170 charges relating to the sexual exploitation of 18 children.
The 27 men and two women appeared before a district judge at Huddersfield Magistrates Court charged with offences including rape, trafficking, sexual activity with a child, child neglect, child abduction, supplying drugs and making of indecent images of children….
The allegations are non-recent sexual offences, dating back to between 2004 and 2011, and relate to 18 women, who were children at the time. The youngest child involved was 11 years old….
The defendants are:
Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 34, Huddersfield is charged with 54 offences. He is charged with 21 counts of rape, 14 counts of trafficking, as well as inciting a child to engage in sexual activity, sexual assault, sexual touching, possession of indecent images of a child, racially aggravated assault and inciting a child into prostitution.
Raj Singh Barsran, 33, Huddersfield. He is charged with sexual touching and rape.
Abdul Rehman, 29, Sheffield. He is charged with rape, trafficking, supplying drugs, supply of a controlled substance with intent to engage in sexual activity and sexual touching.
Nasarat Hussain, 28, Huddersfield. He is charged with three counts of rape, attempted rape and inciting a female to engage in sexual activity.
Irfan Ahmed, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with six counts of trafficking, sexual assault, making indecent images of a child and inciting a child to engage in sexual activity.
Zubair Ahmed, 30, Huddersfield. He is charged with rape and possession of extreme pornography.
Mohammed Riswan Aslam, 29, Dewsbury. He is charged with two counts of rape.
Mohammed Kammer, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with two counts of rape.
Mohammad Nahman, 31, Huddersfield. He is charged with trafficking, sexual assault, and two counts of rape.
Hamzha Ali Saleem, 37, Old Trafford, Greater Manchester. He is charged with three counts of trafficking.
Zahid Hassan, 28, Huddersfield. He is charged with eight counts of rape, five counts of trafficking, racially aggravated assault, supplying drugs, inciting a child into sexual activity, child abduction and attempted rape.
Mohammad Azeem, 31, Bradford. He is charged with three counts of rape.
Sajid Hussain, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with three counts of rape, facilitating the commission of sexual activity on a child and inciting a child into sexual activity.
Mansoor Akhtar, 25, Huddersfield. He is charged with rape, attempted rape and two counts of trafficking.
Mohammed Asaf Akram, 31, Huddersfield. He is charged with seven counts of rape, three counts of trafficking, child abduction, supplying drugs, sexual assault and making threats to kill.
Zulwarnain Dogar, 29, Huddersfield. He is charged with sexual touching and trafficking.
Manzoor Hassan, 37, Huddersfield. He is charged with supply of a noxious substance with intent to injure, annoy or aggrieve a female, supply of Class A drugs and inciting a child into prostitution.
Mohammad Ifraz, 28, Huddersfield. He is charged with trafficking a female within the UK with a view to her sexual exploitation, rape, false imprisonment, child abduction, taking indecent images of a child and inciting a child to engage in sexual activity.
Wiqas Mahmud, 36, Huddersfield. He is charged with three counts of rape.
Faisal Nadeem, 30, Huddersfield. He is charged with supplying drugs, rape and possession of extreme pornography.
Niaz Ahmed, 53, Slaithwaite, Huddersfield. He is charged with inciting a child into sexual activity and sexual assault.
Asif Bashir, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with four counts of rape and attempted rape.
Mohammad Imran Ibrar, 32, Huddersfield. He is charged with trafficking, facilitating the commission of sexual activity on a child, assault occasioning actual bodily harm, supplying drugs.
Aleem Javaid, 27, Huddersfield. He is charged with rape and supplying drugs.
Mohammed Saqib Raheel, 30, Dudley. He is charged with trafficking and child abduction.
Usman Khalid, 29, Huddersfield. He is charged with sexual assault, child abduction and sexual touching.
Everton La Bastide, 50, Huddersfield. He is charged with two counts of sexual assault.
Shahnaz Akhtar Malik, 55, Huddersfield. She is charged with one count of child neglect.
Naveeda Habib, 38, Huddersfield. She is charged with one count of child neglect….
Oliver says
In my view. The politicians who led to their importation should also be tried. And as it is now April 2017
Why if the cases are from 2004 through 3011 are they first being brought to court. Any answers. Other than Britain has no guts or morality.
Jayell says
The Chief of the CPS for the North region was a Muslim, named Azad I believe. Whether his patch covered Huddersfield I am not sure, but if it did it might explain a lot. Certainly this area is not far from Rotherham to the south, Keighley to the north, and Bradford to the east. The whole world must know about Rotherham by now, which has achieved a global reputation for long-term ingrained depraved Islamic corruption, likewise Keighley, and you might as well carry your passport for Bradford these days. So it wouldn’t be surprising to find some kind of all-pervading Muslim-mafia culture influencing things in the whole region, aided and abetted by a weak PC establishment that has no doubt been heavily infiltrated. With that background, it’s surprising if any cases reach the courts at all.
ECAW says
Jayell – You’re thinking of Nazir Afzal, the genius who proved that it had nothing to do with religion and the real cause was that “those controlling the night-time economy, people working through the night in takeaways and driving minicabs, are predominantly Asian men”.
Obviously the Guardian lapped it up:
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/sep/03/nazir-afzal-there-is-no-religious-basis-for-the-abuse-in-rotherham
kaboooooooooooooooooooooooooom says
Crikey one quarter (8) of these sick perverts are named after the “perfect man” pervert, pedophile, murdering necrophiliac, mad m0hamhead – although there were a few close proximities – mansoor and manzoor.
BC says
Cases need to be upheld in court in a legal system which requires witness statements and hard evidence
which is well known to be difficult to gather in rape cases, even with adults. This has to be done by overstretched police forces. Who also are constrained by ‘racial sensitivity’ I agree it should be more rapid but that is how it is. Your American arrogance is on display, are things so much better in USA? Reports suggest otherwise.
The question which needs asking what were the parents of these children doing at the time this was going on?
Oliver says
I did not think I eas being arrogant. As to justice in the US. I believe our land mass and population are greater than once great Britain.
VampireJack says
You do realise that the exact same thing is no doubt happening to American children too, right?
Just because it’s hasn’t been reported yet doesn’t mean it’s not happening – the same M.O. vulnerable young girls in the care system who are being picked up by their much older “Asian” (or perhaps in the US African American Muslim) boyfriends and shared about among their friends and family like uncovered meat.
You have a large amount of muslims in your area? It’s happening.
And, like it was (and still is) in the UK it’s being covered up so as not to appear “racist”.
gravenimage says
UK: Muslim rape gang in court over 170 charges of sexual exploitation of 18 children
……………………………….
It should, sadly, surprise no one that Muslim women were in on this, as well.
There is not only the case of female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, but there have been a number of rapists who have been aided by their mothers and other female relatives.
We tend to think of Muslim women as victims, and they often are–but many are just as intent on enforcing Islam as are their vicious male counterparts.
Charli Main says
Well said. ISIS had/ have several women’s brigades in Syria and Iraq enforcing Sharia on local women. I’ve believe that these female ISIS enforcers engaged in the most appalling brutality against the defenceless women under their control
BC says
Probably out of religious zeal, after all we have unbelievable examples of women converting to Islam in the West, and of course Muslim women taking off to IS with their kids in tow.
It is also possibly a question of better to be a beater than a victim
Kay says
Well I was surprised. But I have much to learn. I keep thinking I have heard as bad as it gets. I keep being wrong.
It makes me sick.
Islam simply destroys anything or everything.
epistemology says
Very true, the American writer Jean Sasson published two books of Sultana’s stories (name changed) a Saudi princess. In one story Sultana is addressed by her Filipina maid whose friend another Filipina maid had been raped by the son of the family she served. The girl implored the rapist’s mother, she thought she could get help from another woman but encountered no empathy whatsoever, the mother said, her son needed sex and the Saudi women were sacrosanct consequently unavailable, and with the maid it doesn’t matter. Muzzie women are heartless bitches.
Know Thy Enemy says
The two Sikhs in this list are not necessarily converts to Islam. Many Sikhs tend towards becoming friends with Muslims. Perhaps this has to do with the fact that most Sikhs and many UK Muslims are both Punjabis and that they prefer friendship with fellow Punjabis. The fact that Muslims are a strong horse in UK only aids this phenomenon. The Muslims of course take full advantage of this tendency among Sikhs.
You become the company you keep, so I am absolutely not surprised that there are Sikh names in this list.
Hindu American says
Historically, muslims and Sikhs have hated each other. The Punjabi angle could be a new one.
Charli Main says
No much sign of that, here in Britain HA.
Sikhs and Hindus, for that matter, are pretty much sitting on the fence. It seems that the prevailing attitude is “the Muslims are not bothering us, let the Brits and Pakis fight it out among themselves”.
If only these folk would wake up to the fact, that when the Muslims have finished with the Christians, THEY ARE COMING FOR THEM.
Danny says
Charli,
wrf to your quote “the Muslims are not bothering us, let the Brits and Pakis fight it out among themselves”.
I think you’re wrong there mate, some hindu and punjabi girls have been caught in this grooming affair as well and since the british police is too busy not offending people’s sensibilities and appearing politically correct, the sikh’s have been busy making a movie to caution british girls about the grooming gangs so they could take precaution. Please check the link below
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQG9DIaTV28
Check this (sikh) man out, he’s giving talks about the extent of the grooming problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ISVWVAejwI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5LjIv7M65s
Maybe you can invite him for a talk at your place?
As for your other quote –
“If only these folk would wake up to the fact, that when the Muslims have finished with the Christians, THEY ARE COMING FOR THEM”
The sikhs are wide awake mate and doing their bit. The muslims don’t go methodically targeting one and then the next, they go against the kuffar all guns blazing, sparing none.
I’m not a sikh nor a hindu, but give credit where it’s due – to the sikhs.
Don’t bother thanking me for the youtube links, just pass them on to others who you think might benefit from them, thanks. Take care
Danny
Charli Main says
Hello Danny,
There is doubtless a SMALL core of Sikhs and Hindus doing their bit to warn about the Muslim threat just as there is a SMALL core of Brits doing the same.
However, the overwhelming majority of Sikhs, Hindus AND BRITS are in denial mode.
I have yet to see a few hundred thousand Sikhs and Hindus take to the streets decrying Muslim atrocities committed against their Christian country folk. There is NO Sikh or Hindu equivalent to the ELD
Kind Regards.
Charli Main says
Sorry for typo should be EDL
Danny says
Charli,
It’s not so much people being in denial mode, but a severe case of self imposed sanction against speaking the truth lest it hurt someone’s FEELINGS. It’s also evidence of the brittleness of the British people’s self-confidence in standing for what is right and just and cowardice in pointing the finger at the problem and calling out the group for its tacit support and encouragement.
If there is one group in denial, that would be the feminists and politically left groups who’re enabling and supporting this behaviour, and why they do this is beyond me? It’s bizzare that it’s mostly middle-class, white, college educated, professional women who condone the pakistani muslims’ behaviour, when it’s the white girls that are being targeted.
Every Brit, be it white, sikh, hindu, black or purple, needs to come together and put an end to this nonsense, why should it just be Tommy Robinson or EDL fighting for Luton or the whole of the UK, everybody needs to chip in.
Recently heard these lovely chaps from pakistan have been equally generous to the white girls in Toronto and Montreal as well.
Until the day EVERY Brit of every hue can confidently, openly and without fear say that islam is incompatible with democracy and western values, this cancer will only metastasize and consume the whole being – or is it racist to say that?
Bsrat says
No surprise this had gone on for far too long in the UK with the blessing of social carers and the police force as they felt it was islamophobic as all these barbaric perpetraters (preditors) were from the same background and same religion.
If a society can’t protect the most vulnerable in this case for fear of been labled racist or islamophe and community cohesion.
what’s next might as well start paying Jiziya tax or even better rename UK britanistan and call it a day, let them run down UK just like the hell holes they come from.
Power to JW and Tommy Robinson EDL for highlighting this issue consistently.
Gee hadn't says
Know thy Enemy, I beg to differ. Sikhs have been defending themselves against Islanic tyranny for 1400 years, it is highly unusual that they would be friends.
Tom says
hope they get live in prison, but its UK/Europe they might get a few weeks of social service, picking up garbage ,or weeding the gardens.
tom parry says
A public hanging in the market square would be fair. (Oh forgotI live in the age of nonsense, )
Pal says
Pew:
2050-2070 World Muslims will surpass Christians; 2100 Muslims 34,9%, Christians 33,8%:
http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/#beyond-the-year-2050
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/06/why-muslims-are-the-worlds-fastest-growing-religious-group/
Pal says
“2050 India with most Muslims in world” (Indonesia?)
http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-to-have-largest-muslim-population-by-2050-report-4552015/
Susan B says
Islam will be gone by then. In fact I would not trust those numbers millions of muslims are bailing from this cult, many hide in the closet to keep from getting murdered.
AleX says
This is the last drop in the glass for the patient Briton.
The scandal is bigger than Rotherham and much more painful now..
Toughest sentences will ensue as an example for the rest of the islamic pack still free in Britain.
AleX says
Errata: what I wanted to say, compared to Rotherham is thus: this last episode will impact more the public outrage because it happens again and the recent memory of the Englishmen is hurt.
Oliver says
2004 through 2011. Not being sarcastic. But is the average Britisher able to recall and think of incidents that long ago.
And. As i asked at the begining.
Why so long before before being charged.
Is there a Statute Of Limitations.
Is that. The clock running out
So bring charges then cannot do anything because of the time lapse
Spike1033 says
This hasn’t been mentioned on British TV news. No surprise.
ShandyLover says
Unfortunately putting this muzzie scum in a British prison will be akin to delivering them to the nearest holiday camp.
In jail over here the muzzies get special, preferential treatment and it is well known that when they leave after completing their sentence that are completely radicalized, if they were not already, and ready to kill kuffirs for allah.
Deportation to the lands of their parents or grandparents are the only thing that can made a difference but that will never happen. The authorities over here are too fearful of doing anything which upsets ‘community cohesion.’
That’s why Rotherham, Oxford, Luton etc happened for over 20 years, and continues to happen. Why after the muzzie terrorist attacked parliament recently the first thought in the assistant commissioner of Scotland yard’s mid was to re-assure the muslims the police was watching out for reprisals on them. Never mind the poor souls killed and maimed. As the French Prime minister said after Nice we will all just have to get used to it.
Frankly, I fear our future generations are doomed. In the West, just as before WW2, appeasement not decisive action is the first course. With Hitler it was almost too late before anything was done and the war was only won because Hitler made terrible decisions.
Sadly, it all has a ring of seen it all before.
ECAW says
These offences date from the period 2004 to 2011.
I expect we will see follow up trials of the police and local government officials who were complicit in these crimes and therefore also broke the law. Or perhaps not.
mortimer says
Muslim women, as we see here, can be RELIED ON to help enslave and exploited DIRTY KAFIRS if it is a benefit for Islam.
Islam removes the conscience of women in the matter of crimes against humanity when MUSLIMS MALES DO IT.
Muslim women become willing accomplices by identifying with the EVIL NARRATIVES of their MALE CAPTORS.
This is a perfect example of the ISLAMIC STOCKHOLM SYNDROME. Muslim women who are VICTIMS themselves, then become PERPETRATORS IN JIHAD…warfare against the dirty kufaar. .
Elaine McMurren says
Don’t give the women a pass. There is NO EXCUSE for what they did. Being victimized does not make you an evil monster. That is 100% personal choice.
dumbledoresarmy says
I counted no fewer than *eight* “Mohammeds” amongst this particular lot of Abusers.
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com.au/2015/07/millions-and-millions-of-mohammeds.html
Sunday, July 19, 2015
Millions and Millions of Mohammeds
Posted by Daniel Greenfield
TL says
Yes, the case has a high Muhammad Coefficient, and the Muslim Coefficient is even higher.
TL says
What evidence supports the sweeping generalization that “only in Islamic law does it [sex slavery, etc] carry divine sanction”?
The claim may be true, but it reads like Trumpish hyperbole. Even worse, maybe it’s false. Either way, insisting that it is true will tend to divert attention from a critical issue in favor of a debate that doesn’t need to take place before one condemns Islam. So it would have been much better to ask a rhetorical question instead. For example: What other religion of sex slavery is wildly popular among communists, secular humanists, Labour, and the Democrats?
Susan B says
TL, islam is the only “so called” religion that does sex slavery with the blessing of their satanic god allah. BIG DIFFERENCE. Remember that mohammad had over 40 sex slaves. Other groups are not religious and know that they are committing a crime.
Crusades Were Right! says
Islam is an abomination on the face of the earth.
When am I going to hear the BBC, CNN, the Guardian, and all the other “champions” of “human rights” discuss Islam’s endorsement of slavery?
Can it be that the ONLY type of slavery the “do-gooders” aren’t concerned about is the type that threatens Christians and Europeans?
Anne Smith says
Don’t mention the BBC – it is staffed and run by many Muslims these days. Just look at all the presenters. Not a programme without a Muslim somewhere.
The advertising on other channels is now stuffed with them.
It was quite amusing listening to the BBC on today this morning, choking up about Trump dropping a very large bomb on ISIL headquarters in Afghanistan. They simply don’t know what line to take on it.
Oliver says
The Afghan defense Secretary seemed pleased about the bomb
moeped says
This obviously has nothing to do with the religion of peace. It’s due to western colonialism and the patriarchy and The Noble and Righteous Crusades and all that stuff.
Jeanette says
All of these court cases are going to drain a western country of money even further than it has already been drained for the benefit of Muslims.
Surprise, surprise.
Mandy says
Why does not country address this when admitting Muslim refugees to their country? The true war on women and girls is this non-action by others against Muslim men and their mistreatment of girls and women.
Ade says
off with their heads
Matthieu Baudin says
“…Not all the defendants have Muslim names; the two with Sikh names and the one other name could be converts to Islam, or non-Muslim degenerates who got in on the action. ..”
As usual a fairminded approach by Robert Spencer, to a fiasco that will continue to grow in Great Britain for years to come. When will the apprentice PM Teresa May get off of her high horse and drop the travel ban on Mr Spencer. Members of the Conservative Party should show some indignation that this nonsense has gone on too long.