• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK: Muslima shot by police as they foil active jihad mass murder plot

Apr 28, 2017 9:45 pm By Robert Spencer

“Counter-terrorism units have been making arrests on a near daily basis amid a huge effort to contain the threat to the UK.”

That is dramatic evidence that their entire approach to the jihad threat is wrongheaded and doomed to failure. But no one in the May government seems to be in a particularly reflective mood.

“‘Don’t touch my body!’ Dramatic moment police tried to treat burka-wearing terror suspect after she was shot in London armed raid to ‘foil active plot,'” by Martin Robinson and Thomas Burrows, MailOnline, April 28, 2017:

The 20-year-old Muslim woman shot by police as they foiled an ‘active terror plot’ was taken away on a stretcher in her blood-soaked burka yelling: ‘Don’t touch my body’.

The suspect screamed ‘get off – do not touch me’ as they tried to strip off her clothes and treat her wounds after the raid in Willesden, north London, at 7pm last night.

Dramatic video footage shows the moment elite Met officers smashed through the door, ran up to the first floor flat and then threw in CS canisters before ‘at least six’ shots rang out including two that shattered an upstairs window.

Neighbours heard a woman ‘screaming’ inside before the young suspect lay on the pavement bleeding from her arm and stomach while still wearing her burka.

One said: ‘Doctors were trying to help her. She was shouting: “Do not touch me, do not touch my body”.’

Another witness who saw the raid’s aftermath said: ‘They brought down a lady in a black burka. She had been shot the paramedics stripped off her clothing to get access to the wounded areas.’

The woman – believed to be the first female terror suspect in UK history to be shot by police – was rushed to hospital where she remains in a serious but stable condition and is too unwell to be arrested under the terrorism act.

Counter-terrorism units have been making arrests on a near daily basis amid a huge effort to contain the threat to the UK.

Activity by police and security services has been running at a high level for a number of years as they attempt to defend Britain against dangers ranging from lone wolf strikes to complex, mass-casualty plots.

Figures show there were 260 arrests for terrorism-related offences last year.

This was a slight fall compared to the previous year, but the number remained high compared with other recent years.

In March it was revealed authorities have thwarted 13 potential attacks in less than four years.

The official threat level for international terrorism has been at severe, indicating an attack is “highly likely”, since 2014.

While Islamic State remains a major focus of the work of police and intelligence agencies, security officials have repeatedly stressed that the threat posed from al Qaida remains.

Counter-terrorism authorities are also handling a rising number of cases of far-right extremism….

Yeah, sure they are. This probably refers to non-Muslims saying rude things to Muslims on buses and in supermarkets.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, United Kingdom Tagged With: London


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Oliver says

    Apr 28, 2017 at 10:06 pm

    What kind of mass terror attack.

    Any other Muslims shot.

    And. Will the paramedics who tried to treat her be charged.

    Refugees or home grown

    How come said muslim terrorists and not Asians

    Many questions

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 12:03 am

      What would the paramedics be charged with?

      • Frank Anderson says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 12:36 am

        GI, in the US the Muslima would start with the claim of “battery”, “harmful or offensive contact with body or something intimately connected with it.” Then she could claim all kinds of “civil rights” violations.

        Again in the US, the paramedics and similar people rendering aid have a strong measure of privilege, especially assuming they are well-trained and following accepted practice in rendering aid.

        Still in the US, a suit against the paramedics filed would almost certainly be dismissed very quickly under a state’s litigation accountability act or Rule 11 of the Federal or corresponding state’s Rules of Civil Procedure. I would expect sanctions (fines) against the attorney handling the case for court costs, defendants’ attorney fees and expenses, and court disciplinary action, up to disbarment from the court. And then the state bar could step in and finish off the lawyer with complete disbarment for bringing such a groundless case.

        In GB, observing the Muslim takeover’s progress, she would probably claim violation of Sharia law and win millions against the government and every person involved. What a difference an ocean can make?

        • gravenimage says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 12:43 am

          Probably so, Frank…

        • Spike1033 says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 3:43 am

          BUT….since she is injured and in danger of dying by refusing medical help she could be charged with self-harm or attempted suicide. It is a criminal offense.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 8:11 am

          Spike, you may know more about the law in GB than I do. It is possible that criminal charges against her could follow several theories, such as conspiracy, planning or attempting murder, terrorism, . . .? But I believe GI was asking what could she claim in a civil suit or charge in a criminal complaint against the paramedics. I can’t help thinking under Sharia law the paramedics interfered with her jihad. As far as their touching her, doesn’t she need 4 male witnesses to make her case? I’m still learning about that. Still curious about what she expects for her heavenly reward?

        • Oliver says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 10:47 pm

          Spike.
          I am not an attorney. However it is my understanding that while suicide is a crime. But I have no clue how one can punish a successful suicide. I don’t think attempted suicide is a crime

        • Frank Anderson says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 11:12 pm

          Oliver, I am not sure who “Spike” may be, but an attempt to commit a crime is almost certainly a crime in the US. The elements (requirements) to prove the case may be different from state to state. Since many states follow others in codifying their laws, it is likely that the elements are very close to each other comparing again, state with state.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 11:15 pm

          I lost track of Spike in the previous posts and ask to withdraw my reference to him.

        • chris says

          May 15, 2017 at 10:44 am

          Considering that male firefighters will leave women to burn (if their house or car is on fire in most muslim countries) if they are not fully covered I think sexual harassment by an infidel might be the charge. And our bend over backwards governments would probably uphold it and offer a few million from the taxpayers in compo

        • Frank Anderson says

          May 15, 2017 at 1:17 pm

          Chris, I hope you understand the bitterness and sarcasm of my analysis. If I were the judge and the defense filed a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim upon which Relief can be Granted instead of an answer. I would rule for the defendant and dismiss the case. Not only that, if the right moves had been make before filing the defense motion to invoke Litigation Accountability law, and Rule 11, I would force the lawyers filing her case to pay all costs, expenses and attorney fees for the defense for filing a groundless complaint. If the government paid money to “settle” the claim I would look for any avenue to sue for dereliction of duty and corruption in office. Then I would help obtain any evidence of public corruption and turn it over to prosecutors. While some in government may be immune from civil suit, they are wide-open to criminal charges, convictions and jail sentences, if you can find a prosecutor who dares to enforce the law.

      • AleX says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 10:09 am

        The parameds would be charged with ‘inappropriate touching while trying to heal her wounds’ and in complete disregard with her reapeatedly saying ‘don’t touch my body’.
        The same as ‘don’t throw me in prison for life’ will work for her when facing the judge.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 8:54 pm

          Alex and GI, if the paramedics failed to render care, they would be exposed to a claim of dereliction of duty. I don’t know how that would come out. It’s a shame to me that their time and talent would be wasted in such a way (trying to save someone who wants to die a martyr); but generally speaking their intervention to aid her is almost certainly required, and equally as certain, that they would be protected from any legal claims or charges as long as they act within the rules of their training and practice.

          Remember the District of Columbia case where a number of women were held in a house something in the order of 14 hours by a gang, and repeatedly beaten and raped. The neighbors called the police multiple times because they could hear the blows and screams. The first time one of the gang members came to the door when an officer knocked and told him nothing was going on. The officer failed to go in and see for himself. Subsequent officers knocked on the door without answer and left. After the gang “got their fill” they left. One of the women crawled out the front door naked and bleeding. The women sued the police. They lost. The police have no duty to protect any individual. They can legally stand, watch our murder, do nothing, and no claim will stand against them. A recent case involving police encouraging an attempted murder of our host, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, could give a different result because of the active participation in the crime rather than the passive observation. I still believe it’s a case that could easily require a million dollars to present and no guarantee of recovering any part of what is spent.

          It is a good question that to my knowledge has not been answered whether and why the police have less of a duty to aid than a paramedic. Of course, the difference in law between the US and GB could cause amazing differences in results. I don’t think any of us reading would like to be finding out “first person”.

          Please consult a currently active and licensed attorney in your jurisdiction. I am retired.

        • gravenimage says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 9:58 pm

          Frank Anderson wrote:

          Alex and GI, if the paramedics failed to render care, they would be exposed to a claim of dereliction of duty.
          …………………….

          They probably would be, Frank. Of course, Infidel doctors and medical personnel always try to save their patients–even if they are repulsed by them personally. In Israel, Jewish and Christian doctors regularly treat Muslims screaming that they want to kill them.

          Clearly, this Muslimah was pretending that those trying to treat her had a prurient interest in looking at her body, which is absurd.

          As for the police, it is true that you cannot successfully sue the police in the US, not matter how neglectful they might be.

          But the municipalities the police work for have successfully been sued on occasion.

        • Frank Anderson says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 11:05 pm

          GI, I believe (MY OPINION) that there is a difference between failure to act and active participation. In Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) federal agents are held subject to suit for violation of civil rights. In Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991), which reversed Will v Michigan Department of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989) (holding both the state and the individuals employed by the state are immune), while the state may be immune, the individual state officers who violate federal civil rights are personally liable to suit.

          Distinguishing passive from active participation and overt encouragement of the commission of a crime generates a powerful argument to also distinguish the DC case where officers were more or less passive, and the Texas case where they were active, and therefore clearly exposed to claims. The officers involved in Texas are FEDERAL officers, subject to Bivens.

          The police in Berkeley this week and previously, who refused to stop riots, are a good example why we should be disgusted with their failure to act, just as we should be disgusted and seek prosecution of the Baltimore mayor who ordered the police to stand by and let rioters burn private property, which is almost certainly subject to an insurance clause excluding from coverage, “war, civil disorder, riot, etc.”

          But the possible different treatment of paramedics shows a hypocrisy in the law. If the police are excused from the indignities of performing the duties they swear to perform, why not also excuse the paramedics, in spite of their swearing similar oaths? I don’t have “the answer”. As a statistics professor loved to say, “Only God knows. . .”

    • jayell says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 1:35 am

      Apparently another muslima was heard to scream ‘don’t touch my body’ as undercover Met officers dragged her off a bus in pushed her into a shop doorway whilst (I believe) forcibly removing her veil. Well, apparently they DID touch her precious body and the press let us know about it. ‘Don’t touch my body’ indeed! Who the hell do these arrogant animals think that are? What were they planning to do to OTHER PEOPLE’S bodies? No doubt ‘other people’s bodies’ don’t matter.These reports seem to show that, despite all the claims of ‘oppression’, these females are at least as bad as the males, and you can sense that in the insolence of their manner when you have to talk to them. The Met Police operations here apparently involved dozens of officers in various locations, no doubt costing a small fortune. That’s on top of the £1.6 million that the Met have paid out for specially equipped SUV’s to deal with the antics of this scum. Add to that the £9+million they started spending a few years ago on extra MI5 officers because of these Muslims. Plus all the cash wasted on enquiries sorting out the trouble they cause in society because they think they’ve got the right to throw their weight around, all the cash wasted on their excess prison numbers because they don’t seem to think they have to respect our laws or our people, all the cash wasted on dealing with the victims of their criminality, all the £millions wasted on the social security/housing/education because they can’t/can’t be bothered to work or control their procreative other without scrounging off everyone else, all the time and money squandered on pandering to their ‘special sensitivities’, etc., etc…..

      ‘Don’t touch my body’ screams this muslima. Too right, we don’t our officers risking contamination – they are much too valuable, unlike YOU. I have a much better idea involving mechanical grabs, dumpsters and industrial waste-disposal plants.

      • Laura says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 5:05 am

        Spoken like a true moderate!

        • jayell says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 4:00 pm

          You guessed it! But I’m just watching my tax bill.

  2. TJ says

    Apr 28, 2017 at 10:59 pm

    My grandfather lost his leg fighting the Nazis in the battIe of the bulge near the end of world war 2. It is certainly true many of the allies lost their lives trying to get rid of an evil anti-jewish ideology. This is something we have in common with the Russians as they lost a lot of people too because of this evil entity. Now another evil anti-jewish entity is spreading around Europe and elsewhere. It certainly does threaten to usurp the allies victory.

    • Oliver says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 12:02 am

      The or rather one of the problems. Many of the leadersof these countries ALSO HATE JEWS.

      And the anti Muslim people. Worshipped here. Like LaPen have top people who are holocaust deniers. LaPen herself denied historical proof that the French collaborated with the Nazis to kill Jews..
      Her father’s top people were neo Nazis.

      I doubt that she is the Joan Of Arc of the 21st century

  3. Guest says

    Apr 28, 2017 at 11:19 pm

    What do you know the British actually have guns. Maybe they have some spine after all.

    • medaber_emet says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 5:10 am

      i didnt know that british policemen were allowed to carry guns
      i thoght they only allowed a wissler

      • Keith Jordan says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 12:23 pm

        What in heck is a “wissler”?

        • gravenimage says

          Apr 29, 2017 at 10:16 pm

          I think he means a “whistle”.

    • Gary Dorion says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 5:15 am

      Never estimate the fighting ability and courage of the Brits who have proved it countless times.

  4. gravenimage says

    Apr 28, 2017 at 11:58 pm

    UK: Muslima shot by police as they foil active jihad mass murder plot
    …………………

    *Good*. But with these Jihad terror plots mushrooming, they are not going to be able to get them all.

    And notice this vicious Jihadist–her only concern is that some “filthy Infidels” might look at her while they are patching her up. Stupid bint.

    • Michael Copeland says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 4:12 am

      The filthy kaffir male paramedics touched her, as is their medical duty.
      She is now contaminated.
      Her male owner’s “honor” (male supremacy) has been disrespected.
      The only Sharia course of action to restore it is for him to kill her.

      • Anne Smith says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 12:52 pm

        What a pity they bothered to give her any medical attention. Might have been better to let her die of neglect. One fewer problem to worry about.

      • gravenimage says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 10:24 pm

        Islamic “logic”, Michael.

      • Oliver says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 10:54 pm

        Good. And many more terrorists. Male and female y

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 10:25 am

      And do we know what “bint” means – literally, not as used daily?

      Normal use means “daughter” but I was told when I lived in Arabia that it translates literally to “slit one.”

      There you go, as you stupid western women support Muslims, that is what they are calling you.

      • Jeanette says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 10:26 am

        That was a message to western women in general, not to graven!

      • gravenimage says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 10:45 pm

        Jeanette, I was not using the term “bint” in any directly Islamic sense–although one theory is that the word used in Britain does have its linguistic roots in Arabic.

        It is a UK slang term that means stupid or silly woman.

        http://www.yourdictionary.com/bint

        And I also was not being misogynist here–I am a woman myself. I would call an ugly and vicious guy a “stupid bastard” in just the same way.

        You are quite right that a lot of Western women are completely clueless about how Islam hates women.

  5. dsinc says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 12:37 am

    Counter-terrorism authorities are also handling a rising number of cases of far-right extremism….

    Yes, Tommy Robinson tried to walk down a street in Tower Hamlets and was arrested for it. He’s not far right, he just wanted to turn right.

    • Sekigahara says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 9:21 am

      I have noticed a trend whereby many governments/security authorities now claim that right wing extremism is a problem, but strangely they never provide any specific examples.

      • gravenimage says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 10:49 pm

        So true…

  6. Undaunted says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 12:45 am

    Lady jihadists cannot and should not be considered less of a threat than their “male” jihadist counterparts. The girls may be more inclined to prove their machismo – devotion to the cause – on any given operation and so may shoot you quicker and stomp on your throat harder and longer than the boys in the band.

    If a muslima is involved in an attack – as a shooter or a bomber or … – don’t hesitate to end their deadly actions with your own deadly force, if that’s what the totality of circumstances tells you – a reasonable person – at the time.

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 10:22 am

      Female or broodmare jihadists, but not lady jihadists.

      Female Muslims are dangerous even if they do nothing but breed.

  7. mortimer says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 2:01 am

    HATRED OF THE DIRTY KAFIRS ‘FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH’ is NORMATIVE Islam, rather than an aberration.

    Rage is considered to be normative Islamic behavior and self-control is considered weakness when Islam is under scrutiny from blasphemers.

    The scene described is almost comical. A woman in a burqa who has been shot and wounded is bleeding copiously and refuses to let medics provide first aid.

    Sad or hilarious, your choice. I say, ‘Tragically sad.’

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 10:20 am

      Throw a net over her, or roll her up in a rug, and deposit her on the doorstep of the Muslim Mayor.

  8. Davegreybeard says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 2:38 am

    With all due respect Undaunted, it is not a “lady jihadist,” it is just a smaller target.

  9. Benedict says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 2:45 am

    What is the reward granted a female “martyr” in the Islamic paradise? Boys, virgins, raisins? Couscous with halal bacon and vodka? –
    Does anyone know?

    • Saleem Smith says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 3:22 am

      Hello Benedict,

      What is the reward granted a female “martyr” in the Islamic paradise?

      More slavery to the details of Islamic theology and law.

      We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that Mohammedanism is a terribly dangerous and harmful fraud. Mohammed the prophet of Islam is considered to be the model man by the majority of Muslims.

      >>>>>

      The Sexual Powers of Prophet Muhammad

      Many Muslims believe that the prophet Muhammad was a man endowed with super human powers in the realm of sexuality. Muslim males are especially proud of this Islamic tradition and often use it as material for jokes and boasting.

      During my days in Islam, I remember a product being sold in an Islamic book store that was designed to give men extra sexual energy. It was a glass jar containing a mixture of pistachio nuts and honey as well as some other ingredients.

      The guy working the cash register was grinning from ear to ear trying to make fun while explaining that studly Muhammad had the sex drive of thirty men and used to bed all of his women in one night when the horny little freak got the urge. I just smiled back at the guy and laughed at his stupidity.

      Here is an authentic hadith documenting the great sexual prowess of one Muhammad of Arabia:

      Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 5, Number 268:

      Narrated Qatada:

      Anas bin Malik said, “The Prophet used to visit all his wives in a round, during the day and night and they were eleven in number.” I asked Anas, “Had the Prophet the strength for it?” Anas replied, “We used to say that the Prophet was given the strength of thirty (men).” And Sa’id said on the authority of Qatada that Anas had told him about nine wives only (not eleven).

      See, Muhammad really was a playboy who scored with the ladies! So what if some of those women were in actuality slaves and concubines, right? It is likely that both Muhammad’s slave and non-slave women would have left that disgusting little pig were it not for fear of losing their lives. After all, he had killed some of their husbands.

      Jihadis are blowing themselves up and killing both Muslim and non-Muslim peoples on a daily basis trying to get to “the goodies” waiting in Paradise that “Muhammad promised them”. Those deluded fools think that Mr.Allah up there in 7th heaven is going produce an endless supply of perfect virgins for them.

      These programmed robots are trying to kill their way into Paradise so that they can “get busy with all of those willing cuties”. The Qur’an, that hideously evil piece of trash that was Muhammad’s ticket to “the good life”, contains many passages describing the carnal rewards of Islamic heaven.

      Here is a small sample of what Muslim males expect to enjoy when they die:

      Qur’an, 056.012-039: They shall recline on jeweled couches face to face, and there shall wait on them immortal youths with bowls and ewers and a cup of purest wine (that will neither pain their heads nor take away their reason); with fruit of their own choice and flesh of fowls that they relish. And theirs shall be the dark-eyed houris, chaste as hidden pearls: a guerdon for their deeds… We created the houris and made them virgins, loving companions for those on the right hand…

      055.054-059: They shall recline on couches lined with thick brocade, and within reach shall hang the fruits of both gardens. Which of your Lord’s blessing would you deny? Therein are bashful virgins whom neither man nor jinnee will have touched before. Which of your Lord’s blessings would you deny? Virgins as fair as corals and rubies. Which of your Lord’s blessing would you deny?

      055.072-075: Dark-eyed virgins, sheltered in their tents (which of your Lord’s blessing would you deny?), whom neither man nor jinnee will have toughed before. Which of your Lord’s blessing would you deny?

      Muslim males actually expect 72 virgins each when they die and go to heaven! Muslims believe this nonsense because it is specified in a Hadith contained within the Al-Tirmidhi collection: (volume IV, chapters on The Features of Paradise as described by the Messenger of Allah [Prophet Muhammad], chapter 21, About the Smallest Reward for the People of Paradise, Hadith 2687).

      “The Prophet Muhammad was heard saying: ‘The smallest reward for the people of paradise is an abode where there are 80,000 servants and 72 houri, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine, and ruby, as wide as the distance from Al-Jabiyyah [a Damascus suburb] to Sana’a [Yemen]’.”

      The sensual pleasures that Muslims expect to experience in Paradise have been described in graphic detail by Egyptian scholar and Islamic theologian, Imam Al-Suyuti (died 1505). He wrote:

      “Each time we sleep with a houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [ie Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetizing vaginas.”

      Though fear and hatred are the real engine of Islam, sex and other luxuries are a damn close second! No wonder so many Muslims are eager to kill and die and go to heaven!!

      • Benedict says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 9:34 am

        You almost made me convert to Islam, SS. I suggest that JW delete your comment. –

        BTW SS: If I should decide to become a Muslim, do you – or anyone else – know where I can rent a flying donkey, so that I can visit the place you describe in a proper prophetic manner?

      • Jeanette says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 10:19 am

        It sounds like the Muslims might be a major reason that we are losing the rhinos on this planet.

        If that is the case, another black mark for Muslims to add to their already black abyss.

    • Bill W. says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 6:58 am

      Restoring her private parts back to there original showroom order like a new car, maybe with that new car odor. Maybe that is her idea of 7 heaven.

    • gravenimage says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 11:34 pm

      All female “Martyrs” in Islamic Paradise get is to watch their husbands f*ck those virgins, and they don’t have to go to hell. That’s about it…

  10. Saleem Smith says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 3:49 am

    Mohammed was the perfect man of peace. Muhammad was probably the most evil man to have ever lived. Sharia law is Islamic theology applied.

    Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:

    “One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur’an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way…

    The statement continues,

    Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.”

    • Jeanette says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 10:16 am

      Mohammed is certainly responsible for more deaths than any other single human being – 270 MILLION, according to American Thinker.

      And, he is responsible for the enslavement of 185 million people.

      Perhaps he wasn’t merely bereft of human compassion; perhaps he was bereft of humanity, period. He certainly behaved as we might imagine an alien intent on destroying humanity to behave.

      Mohammed as Predator … hmmmm ….

  11. Charli Main says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 5:35 am

    Won´t be long before the ” feminists”, the ‘uman rights brigade and assorted Muslim huggers start screaming about police ” brutality” and the barbaric way these poor little Muslims were treated.

    The ” hug a refugee” lawyers will be licking their chops at the prospect of all the compensation claims that will be served on the police for sexual assault, racism, bigotry and Islamophobia.

    No doubt Paki Khan will be making a statement demanding a full, in depth investigation into the way this operation was conducted.

  12. Graham says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 7:55 am

    The BBC coverage of this event was bizarre! (Almost comical!) Because they refuse to use the words ‘Jihad’, ‘Muslim’ or ‘Islam’ you came away from listening to this news item on BBC 4 with the impression that some radical, new, up until now unknown terrorist group were attacked by the Police! Who could this new group be? Was this another ‘Waco’ like event? It was very puzzling! That is until you realise two things – The BBC’s pathetic agenda, and the fact that EVERY TERRORIST ATTACK IS ISLAMIC! It is hilarious though to listen to the BBC’s attempts to hide this. “Shhhh! Don’t mention the terrorists names!”

    • Charli Main says

      Apr 29, 2017 at 10:51 am

      Have you noticed that the BBC almost always sends Paki/Muslim reporters to cover these events. ??

      • gravenimage says

        Apr 29, 2017 at 11:57 pm

        Yes. These bylines are even starting to crop up in the US. *Ugh*.

  13. John A. Marre says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 9:18 am

    Muslims don’t change when they go to live in a country that is not dominated by Islam. They expect everyone else to change. They are not there to enjoy the personal freedom that is part of Western Civilization. They are there to destroy it.

  14. Jeanette says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 10:11 am

    “‘Don’t touch my body!’ Dramatic moment police tried to treat burka-wearing terror suspect after she was shot in London armed raid to ‘foil active plot,’” by Martin Robinson and Thomas Burrows, MailOnline, April 28, 2017:

    UK: Time to start carrying big fishing nets especially for female Muslim terrorists?

  15. davej says

    Apr 29, 2017 at 11:55 am

    OK, so “Sorry we cannot render medical aid to any Muslims as it would be disrespectful”. We just leave them bleeding in the street while they wait for Allah to hoist them into Heaven for their jihadi rewards.

  16. Mahendra Singh says

    Apr 30, 2017 at 3:26 am

    Compared to UK, the US police are far more efficient. The woman would have joined all \her jehadi brethren at the doors of paradise if a US policeman had shot her.. You see, now she will claim
    thousands of pounds in compensation, plus a long treatment. I did not even bother to read why the
    shooting occurred. If she was a Muslima, reason enough.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.