• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Why Prisons Are Breeding Grounds for Jihad Terrorists

Apr 11, 2017 7:19 am By Ming Gordon

Recent headlines have lamented Islamic sharia control of entire prison housing blocks in Great Britain. At home, American political leaders are beginning to recognize and assess the threat of religious radicalization in prisons. It is a growing threat, in need of vigorous oversight and management. But efforts to combat this serious homeland security threat will flounder so long as well-intentioned but constitutionally unnecessary religious liberty legislation continues to be extended beyond the general public to inmates. It’s one thing to address the encroachment on religious free exercise that was rampant in the Obama years, as witnessed during its death throes. And legislation passed in the early 1990s was necessary to protect free exercise by law-abiding religious believers, as evidenced by Obamacare’s preventative care mandate that requires coverage for potentially abortion-inducing drugs. Designed as a shield against government intrusions on religious liberty, hostile inmates and their allies will use it as a sword to harass and intimidate prison chaplains, administrators and policy makers. Extending extra-constitutional protection to inmates is a recipe for trouble that will undermine correctional officials and embolden radical elements. The danger is easily remedied if Congress has the will and the courage to retract an unwarranted extension of religious liberty legislation known as RLUIPA as it applies to prison populations, and leave inmate free exercise issues to be governed by the First Amendment. Unless this modest remedy is advanced, prison radicalization will deepen and correctional authorities will soon face a crisis.

US prisons are not free to develop their own policy about religion based on First Amendment standards. As odd as it may sound, local jails and state and federal correctional institutions are bound to a higher standard than is established by the First Amendment. And the reason is that politically conservative religious liberty advocates have required it. Here, in brief, is the backstory.

In 1990 Justice Antonin Scalia authored Smith v. Oregon — his one great error. Smith held that laws of general applicability that are religiously neutral yet have an incidental impact of religious free exercise are not constitutionally suspect and are reviewed in court challenges by a low standard: is the law rationally related to some legitimate government power? If so, the incidental impact of free exercise is part of life. That is termed the “rational relationship test” — usually an easy test for government to satisfy.

In response Congress and 22 states have passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). It elevates the standard in all such cases for federal government action (and state action in states where similar state laws have been adopted). That standard is that the government must show a “compelling government interest” that cannot be achieved by any alternative means that is less restrictive of religious free exercise. That is “strict scrutiny,” and is often fatal to challenged government action. That is critical, and is the reason the Hobby Lobby case defeated the Obamacare mandate for an employer with a religious objection to provide its employees with “preventative care” insurance coverage that included emergency contraception that the employer and the FDA said may be an abortifacients. Hobby Lobby was an RFRA case.

Jump ahead to the year 2000. Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). It amended RFRA and applies it to all prisoners. It thus applies  “strict scrutiny” to any action that constitutes a “substantial burden” to an inmate’s practice of religion and defines religion so broadly that it includes everything from typical religious activity we are familiar with in the USA to anything an inmate sincerely professes – things such as Tarot cards, Wiccan practices, and Santeria are all protected, and so are “religions of one” in which the inmate is the only person in the world who holds a particular belief, so long as it is sincere. Of course, the law covers Judaism, Islam and Christianity. It has some good results — such as kosher meals for sincere Jewish inmates, etc. But there are problems brewing. Here is the key: RLUIPA’s strict scrutiny is not required by the Constitution. US Supreme Court case law holds that when you go to prison, part of the penalty for crime is potential restriction of religious liberty. If a prison has a “legitimate penological justification” for restricting some religious practice — say, inmates drinking communion wine or possessing a dagger for a Satanic ritual — that is enough to limit the free exercise.

Now, those examples are obvious, and would likely survive even strict scrutiny analysis. But recently, some state’s correctional systems, under the pressure of RLUIPA litigation, have recognized groups previously considered “disruptive groups” as religions – including the Nation of God on Earth, a.k.a. the 5% or Five Presenters. It is an offshoot of Nation of Islam. In another case, one state yielded to an adult inmate who converted to Islam and wanted a circumcision. Prison authorities were obliged to accommodate him and transport him to a hospital for the procedure.  The standard in those cases was not the constitutional test of “reasonable penological justification” — with its deference to correctional experts to identify security and safety risks — but strict scrutiny under RLUIPA. So as a result, we may see challenges in the future that go to the heart of what may be fertile recruiting ground for radicalization — prisons — like the problem that is happening in Great Britain. This could be about any religion.

In the federal system, Muslim inmates at Terre Haute, a maximum security federal compound that holds special monitoring inmates, are allowed to participate in group prayer, which is led by one of the inmates who is elected as the leader. That includes the “American Taliban” guy.

But the Constitution and federal judges are not the ones who mandate this. Congress is. It is all about RLUIPA. And religious conservatives are its main supporters. They have championed the law in some worthwhile cases, but the broad reach of the law is dangerous. In many states, no inmate is permitted to “lead” a group religious activity, as it may give him power or influence over other inmates. But challenges are sure to come, in view of the federal prison system yielding on the issue. This is why RLUIPA is a bad idea. But the conservatives don’t think so. They point to Judge Gorsuch’s decision in Yellowbear v. Lampert. But RLUIPA opens up the breeding ground for radicalization — and not just in one religion, but also in any, although jihadis are clearly taking concerted advantage of this situation.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Jihad in prisons Tagged With: RFRA, RLUIPA


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. God's Warrior says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 7:33 am

    Prison is where Baghdadi-baby perfected his delusions of grandeur, making him number one nutjob amongst the bored holy martyrs, allowing him to ascend to his invented post of super-caliph unchallenged.

    Soon decent people will avoid prison just to not have to deal with their insanity.

  2. Buford says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 9:21 am

    That can be stopped in Prison they HAVE few if any Rights Quran’s run against
    the US Constitution & should not be allowed in any Detention Facility that garbage is not a religion it encourages violence & terrorism.

    • PRCS says

      Apr 11, 2017 at 2:20 pm

      Provide the inmates with an “approved” Qur’an.

      One in which hateful, supremacist, violent passages have been blacked out.

      • Guest says

        Apr 11, 2017 at 11:00 pm

        Yes, that would save on printing, too – not much left after that :).

  3. salim says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 9:24 am

    I think vulnerability is a keyword here. Muslims target vulnerable individuals and prey on them. Inmates often suffer of a feelings of being rejected and the fragile family bond doesn’t help especially when contrasted by the strong brotherhood spirit among Muslims. Muslims work in groups, others don’t.

    Why Christian inmates convert to Islam but not other religions? because other religions don’t proselytise and and don’t care if you follow them or not, only Muslims take this seriously.

    Muslim students do similar things in university campus. They do not get as many converts as in prison but they quickly take control of students unions and use them to advance their political agenda.

  4. mortimer says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 9:37 am

    DEPROGRAMMING IN PRISONS MUST BEGIN

    It must first be recognized that Islam is a Personality Cult, Rape Cult, Rage Cult, Extortion Cult, Theft Cult, Death Cult and Prevarication Cult rolled into one.

    ALL THESE CULTISH ATTRIBUTES OF ISLAM ARE CLEARLY VISIBLE AND COMMON KNOWLEDGE TO AN ORDINARILY REASONABLE PERSON.

    Islam should not be allowed in ordinary prisons and Muslim prisoners should be segregated to reduce an increase in cultic behaviors which are all undesirable.

    Prisons should be centers of the MOST ADVANCED DEPROGRAMMING TECHNIQUES. Prisoners should be rewarded for taking rigorous courses in Islamic Deprogramming using the LATEST TEXTUAL, ETHICAL and HISTORICAL research which debunks and removes the possibility of Islamic belief. Inmates should view films, read books, write essays, join discussions and pass exams on the course material of Islamic Deprogramming.

    It’s time for Western countries to admit the fact that Islam is an EXTREMELY DANGEROUS, classical cult. Islam teaches criminals that their criminality can be used by Allah in his cause of subjugating the earth.

    • salim says

      Apr 11, 2017 at 11:41 am

      Good points, but do you think it will happen in your life time? I doubt it (and I assume you are young).

      • mortimer says

        Apr 11, 2017 at 3:45 pm

        It will not happen until the all-out jihad begins in the West.

  5. John A. Marre says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 12:50 pm

    It’s not a religion like the others. It’s primarily a political movement that seeks to expand to all world governments. It uses the religious aspect to get special privileges in the USA. It should get none. It is not a religion.

    • mortimer says

      Apr 11, 2017 at 3:48 pm

      ‘Deen’ means a ‘juridico-governmental system’, rather than ‘religion’ as it is translated. The religion and government are combined seamlessly.

  6. Benedict says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 2:07 pm

    Resentment, rejection, hatred and compulsion for revenge fit the demands of the Quran perfectly, so if the shoe fits, wear it! Any destructive emotion can be used in the service of Islam. It even justifies them and sanctifies them and adds or bolsters the most deadly of them all: pride. And this might explain the appeal Islam has to criminals and terrorists in the making. –
    So what glaring naivety or stupidity to provide prisoners with a Quran!

  7. Northern Virginiastan says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 8:32 pm

    BTW I received a tweet from Randall Todd “Ismail” Royer of the Virginia jihad network. He had spent time in the CMU at Terrre Haute. I was shocked to learn that he had been released from prison in December 2016.

  8. Northern Virginiastan says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 8:44 pm

    Johnny Walker Lindh was quite willing to accept money from his Dad, who left his Mom for a man, and use it to finance his Islamic studies.

    Sometimes I wonder if Lindh converted to Islam for some structure in his life after growing up with a couple of flaky parents. The same goes for Bowe Bergdahl and Lindsay Lohan.

  9. billybob says

    Apr 11, 2017 at 9:45 pm

    The dual nature of Islam must finally be recognized by the Law. Islam is BOTH a religion AND an insidious and seditious political ideology. The Law must recognize this, as it does an infinite range of other complex human issues. Once that recognition is made, we could do thing like: When a Muslim is practicing the religious aspect of his faith, he has all the protections of any other religion, and when he is practising the ideological aspects of his faith, he may be dealt with accordingly, even up to being charged with treason.

    We could evolve a test like is common in law: We look at the potential outcome of some behaviour. If the outcome is seen to be benign, the behaviour is interpreted as religious. If the outcome is seen to be seditious, then the behaviour may be deemed to be ideological.

  10. UNCLE VLADDI says

    Apr 12, 2017 at 5:16 pm

    Islam is the “religion” of crime, wherein the “holy mobster” gang members get to blame a sick twisted version of a “God” for their own criminal desires and actions.

    “Submission, the religion of Pacification” = “Extortion, the religion of Thieves!”

    Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as exemplified by the collective words and deeds of it’s Founder:

    “I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping and ransoming, enslaving, raping and murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

    – Muhammad –

    Muhammad was really only a con-man and bandit-king, an arch-criminal who always blamed “god” for his own penchant for committing crimes. If Moe got away with committing a crime (and he tried them all, enthusiastically, more than once, but instead of ever showing contrition, bragged about how much fun it was to commit them, and advised everyone else to join in the fun, too), then it was held to be “obvious” that “god” wanted him to get away with having committed those crimes!

    EVERY IMAGINABLE CRIME IS OFFICIALLY COMMANDED TO BE COMMITTED BY ALL muslims AGAINST ALL THE NON-muslimS IN THE WORLD FOR ALLAH!

    9:120 promises Muslims that any hardship endured in aid of trespassing against disbelievers will be imputed to them by allah as a righteous good deed.

    So, what criminal wouldn’t love to learn that none of it was his fault in the first place, and that by committing his crimes, he wasn’t showing evidence of his own sickness, but of a holy right and duty as assigned to him by God himself?! OF COURSE islam shouldn’t be taught in prisons (or anywhere else)! It’s illegal to call for or endorse the commission of crimes, but the clueless retards we laughingly call “our leaders” never let a good crisis go to waste; after all, their motto must be “There’s No Money In Solutions! (so: Please Give Generously – AGAIN)!”

    According to their own Eastern histories, islam has an official 1,400 year history of “holy” lies, extortions, robberies, tortures, arsons, kindappings, slaveries, rapes and 270 million murders: that’s OVER A QUARTER-BILLION INNOCENTS SACRIFICED TO ALLAH, so far!

    For a detailed breakdown of historical islamic depredations by region and era, just Google for: “Tears of Jihad.”

    Islam has a larger death-tally than that of EVERYONE ELSE, both secular and religious, COMBINED, and with an historical average of less than 1% of the global population to have committed it with, too!

    Do the math: 270 million divided by 1,400 is almost 200,000 per year, or over 500 per day, or over 20 per hour or about one person every three minutes being murdered by Muslims ever since Islam was founded.

    So, simply and precisely because of their “THOU SHALT KILL!” cultural Indoctrination, MUSLIMS ARE STILL FROM BETWEEN FOUR AND SEVERAL HUNDRED TIMES MORE LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN MURDER (and all other crimes,) THAN EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD!

    According to Paris-based Iranian sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar, “of France’s 64,000 prisoners, up to 60% are Muslim. (Muslims are thought to compose only 8% of the population.)”

    Based on data from 2011, Pew Research Center estimated that Muslims made up 9% of the 1,598,780 state and federal prisoners in the United States. Pew also reported that as of 2010, about 0.8% of the U.S. population was Muslim, up from 0.6% in 1990. Data allegedly provided by the federal Bureau of Prisons reported that, as of 1997, Muslims made up 7.27% of the federal prison population.

    In other words, Muslims are overrepresented in the French prison population by 7.5 times their percentage of the population. In the United States, although their overall percentage is smaller, Muslims are overrepresented in the prison population by 11.25 times their percentage of the population.

    Here’s the most recent American prison-inmate-by-religion stats:

    US Inmate population religious preferences

    58% Christian
    29% Muslim
    13% Other (including Atheist)

    Since muslims are at most 3% of the total population in America, it’s obvious they are TEN TIMES more likely than their numbers would indicate, to be in prison.

    And I believe Americans in general poll at 80% Christian, so they are under-represented in prison, by at least 30% or one third less than one might have otherwise expected, based on population percentage alone.

    But it’s not surprising, really:

    ALL muslims are criminals: by their own rules, they must endorse in public every word in the Qur’an, which tells them that they are so “superior” to all non-muslims, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being muslims:

    “Slay the non-muslims wherever you find them,” (Qur’an 9:5), “Strike upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip,” (Qur’an 8:12) and “Fight them until there is no unbelief and the religion, all of it, is for Allah” (Qur’an 8:39).

    And they have no choice – islam isn’t cafeteria catholicism, it’s all or nothing (sura 2:85) and so if they give evidence they aren’t toeing the line, the others must murder them for hypocrisy (4:86).

    Therefore all muslims call them selves “muslims” and not “islamists,” or “radicals,” or “moderates!”

    So the Qur’an is a clearly-written, us-versus-them hate-crime book, endorsing a permanent might-makes-right death-threat. In fact, it’s quite accurate to note that the Qur’an is what you’d get if Hitler had written the Bible.

    The Qur’an tells it’s muslim mind-slaves that they are in fact SO “superior” to all the non-members of their war and plunder cult, that it’s not only their right, but also their holy duty to their god, to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims in the world, simply for the “crime” of not being muslims!

    So “muslims” are nothing more than criminals, pedophile murderers who dress up in the robes and beards of religious men, waving fake bibles, yelling about “god” to cover up their criminal natures to get closer to their victims.

    ALL muslims are criminals, as being members of the ancient, ongoing global extortion racket called islam. In sharia law texts, muslims are SUPPOSED to be regarded as threats (as “objects of fear”) by all the unbelievers, whether or not the individual muslim has itself actually committed any crimes.

    (As documented in the Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, INSTITUTES, on pages 154 & 157); Qur’an 8:57 & 60.

    That’s why we have laws against simply being a MEMBER of a crime-gang or ‘criminal enterprise’ because their membership endorses the inherent threat. Threats are crimes in themselves: they are psychological attacks, also known as intimidation, bullying, coercion, duress, harassment, activist agitation, extortion, and “terrorism.”

    And even any “only” attempted crimes are still considered by civilized people to be crimes.

    The Qur’an clearly and very specifically tells muslims the Bible is wrong and also that all Christians and Jews are infidel criminals who worship a false god, and who must therefore be extorted, enslaved, and murdered for their “crime” of not being muslims:

    Sura (Chapter) 47:1-4 of the Qur’an:

    1: non-muslims are bad, (allegedly because they insult allah by dividing his nature*);
    2: muslims are good, [allegedly because to them allah is the cause of everything (3:151];
    3: Allah made them both like that;
    4: So muslims should chop off the non-muslims’ heads.
    (“Allah could have done it himself, but he wants you muslims to do it for him”).

    So don’t go looking for what actions of yours may have offended or provoked them; they have been taught from birth that your existence alone offends their god, and so should offend them.

    Muslims have been officially taught to believe that they are the “best of people” (Qur’an 3:110) and that unbelievers are the “most vile of created beings” (Qur’an 98:6).

    So, if and when you consider islam to be a religion, you must agree with it’s main tenet: that God is a violent murderer who wants his muslim tribe to violently conquer the world by extorting, enslaving, and murdering all the non-muslim humans, right?

    At WORST, all REAL religions only say:

    “Obey our silly rules, or GOD (/’the gods’) will get you!”

    …but ONLY islam says:

    “Obey our silly rules, or WE will get you (‘for god’)!”

    A forced ‘Faith!’ ISN’T a “Faith!” at all – it’s only extortion, and extortion is always a CRIME.

    Bottom line: Muslims must be told straight out, unequivocally: “If you decide to believe in “allah,” you have declared yourself a criminal, and so must be arrested, indicted, tried and convicted. Your confession of “faith” in your crime-god will help us to do so.”

    Further, here are some more teachings from the Koran, “valid from eternity to eternity”:

    2:191 Slay the unbelievers wherever you come upon them.
    9:5 Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.
    2:98 Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers.
    30:45 Allah does not love the unbelievers.
    3:28 Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.
    3:85 If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah) it will never be accepted.
    8:12 Cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.
    8:60 And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy.
    4:89 Anyone trying to leave islam must be murdered for it.

    Got that yet? “Kill them wherever you find them!” is from (2:191, 4:89, AND 9:5).

    There really is not any room for doubt. Islam is a MURDER-gang / extortion racket posing as religion.

    So the ultimate aim of islam is to MURDER US!

    Once they have the world, their scriptures declare that the “pay the jizya” protection racket option will become null and void, leaving only “convert or DIE!”

    That’s their own, officially declared end-game aim!

    Why not skip all the intermediate steps, as so many of them obviously feel perfectly god-mandatedly free to do, and cut to the chase?!

    How do you compromise with an existential enemy Hellbent on genocide?
    7.167, 8.67, 47.4 Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177

    How does one ‘compromise’ with declared assassins and robbers?

    Agree to let them only half-kill you? To kill “only” half of your family?

    Allow them to only steal half your stuff (today, and half again tomorrow)?

    When is enough suicidally masochistic appeasement enough, to liberals?!

  11. heather says

    Apr 15, 2017 at 2:56 pm

    You have certainly done your homework! Wonderfully put together and explained. I-slam is the devil and the perfect cult for the depraved.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.