A teenager accused of fatally stabbing a service station worker in an ‘ISIS inspired’ attack has been segregated for allegedly threatening to rape and kill a prison guard ‘in the name of Allah’.
As is well documented on this site, jihadis routinely commit brazen crimes and issue threats against innocent people in the name of Allah. Yet as commonplace as this is becoming, Western officials appear more concerned with appearing “tolerant” than with dealing with this threat realistically. Even as he threatens to rape and murder in the name of Allah, his religious observances will be allowed him, as a “reasonable accommodation.”
“Teenager accused of fatally stabbing service station worker segregated for ‘threatening to rape and murder prison guards in the name of Allah'”, by Stephen Johnson, Daily Mail, May 7, 2017:
A teenager accused of fatally stabbing a service station worker in an ‘ISIS inspired’ attack has been segregated for allegedly threatening to rape and kill a prison guard ‘in the name of Allah’.
The 16-year-old boy and another juvenile, aged 15, were last month charged with murdering Caltex worker Zeeshan Akbar, 29, at Queanbeyan, in southern New South Wales.
They were arrested in nearby Canberra over the death of the Pakistani national, after they had allegedly written ‘IS’ in blood on the front of the service station.
The older boy is being held at the Frank Baxter Juvenile Justice Centre at Kariong, on the NSW Central Coast north of Sydney, where he allegedly repeatedly threatened to rape and murder prison officers, the Sunday Telegraph reports.
Prison sources told the newspaper the accused murderer had also threatened to stab and rape the officers’ families.
The report said he was being investigated for previously posting extremist material online as part of his possible links with Islamist groups.
His alleged behaviour has led to calls from the Public Service Association, which represents prison guards, for purpose-built juvenile detention wing of the Supermax prison at Goulburn.
The other young boy is being held in a separate juvenile justice centre and is reportedly co-operating with staff.
Both teenagers reportedly should [sic] ‘Allahu Akbar’ following his arrest….
Monty says
God is not mocked. Islam is God’s judgement unleashed on the former “Christian” world that has turned away. God has a neat way of dealing with such people. He simply lets them get on with it. God could indeed stop Islam in its tracks and one day He will. In the meantime the world reaps what it sows. Islam has a moral code that opposes adultery, homosexuality and sex outside of marriage. That code mirrors the Bible, except that Islam brutally punishes such offences. “Be not deceived. As a man sows, so shall he reap”. Also around 2,000 years ago but just as true today.
Paul N Silas says
Completely agreed with you brother Monty. Islam and Marxism are judgements against mankind, preparing for The Bridegroom’s return.
Keep you lantern filled with oil and bless you
Benedict says
I tend towards the same understanding, Monty. Our “Christian” part of the world today has abandoned and rejected the crucified Christ and unleashed Barabbas in his place, and now thugs from the Muslim world unite with home-breed barbarians in terror, filth and violence in the West. This is the default setting of a culture that mocks the God of the Christian gospel: their house will be left to them desolate.
Paul N Silas says
2 Timothy 3:1
“But understand this, that in the last days there will come savage times”.
JMB says
Agree with you completely Monty. I fact I have just put a similar message on Facebook directed at a family member who does not see any problems with Islam here in Australia.
AleX says
‘Islamophobia’ has a moral code that opposes adultery […]’.
Wrong. Islam IS adultery and any other form of sexual abuse derives from it.
Islam has NO moral code.
Everything is immoral in islam.
gravenimage says
Thank you, AleX.
gravenimage says
Monty wrote:
Islam has a moral code that opposes adultery, homosexuality and sex outside of marriage. That code mirrors the Bible…
………………………
I’m sorry–are you *insane*? What Islam considers “adultery” is often trying to escape a forced marriage, speaking with an unrelated member of the opposite sex, or merely reporting a rape:
“Amnesty International: ‘Woman’ stoned to death in Somalia was 13-year-old rape victim”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/11/amnesty-international-woman-stoned-to-death-in-somalia-was-13-year-old-rape-victim
And Islam considers a man “chaste” if he marries four females, including pre-pubescent girls, rapes Infidels in Jihad, and keeps as many sex slaves as he desires.
I can only hope you are ignorant of these facts, and that you do not actually consider such horrors “moral”.
dumbledoresarmy says
Not to mention that sharia holds that a muslim man can seize and rape the *wife* of another man, so long as that other man is a dirty infidel, and that such seizure, and rape, is NOT ‘adultery’… because the woman’s marriage vows are not viewed as sacrosanct AT ALL, they are after all only the marriage vows of a dirty infidel, not recognised by the sharia, and are deemed to have been annulled – PFFFFT! just like that! – the instant she is grabbed by some rampaging jihadist.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Dumbledore’s Army. Islam has no respect for marriage as a bond of love between two people; just as a form of Muslim ownership.
It can also be instantly dissolved if a Muslim grows tired of his wife for whatever reason, with the intoning of the the “Triple Talaq”. Were I a Muslim male–God forbid–I could have divorced one of my wives without consequence in less time than it took to type this short post.
Of course, his wives have no such recourse.
Bob Brown says
Australia is run by leftists, and I can tell you how that all happened, but such would be “politically incorrect”, right?
JMB says
Our Liberal Party (conservative side of politics here) Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull is openly sympathetic to Muslims and also supports a progressive social policy, eg. supports gay marriage. He is fast loosing a lot of his traditional support. Fortunately the PM is being kept in check by former PM Tony Abbott and the increasing support of groups such as virulently anti immigration a d anti-Muslim parties such as One Nation and Australian Conservative.
This nation has been totally infiltrated with the virus of political correctness at very level.We also have a very strong and left-leaning labor party and the Grees enjoy strong support.
But Note, A Mr Bob Green was the name of our former Greens leader!
JMB says
Correction re above. His name was BOB BROWN (Senator) That was a typo on my part.
Dan says
Give the guards pigskin truncheons and batons, and pigskin gloves and boots.
Won’t be a nut job Islamist come anywhere near them.
JMB says
Don’t worry, as long as they know they won’t get caught, like as on CCTV, our prison guards have their “Ways and means”. I am hoping that the Prison Officers Union will have strong words to say about this. (But unfortunately our Labor Unions are very PC)
carpediadem says
Running piggies thru the yard would be the most efficient and entertaining method.
mortimer says
Rape is a normative, natural part of jihad in K.4.23-24, rather than an aberration or ‘excess’. Mohammedans use the sacred example of Mohammed’s personal rape of slaves to justify their right to rape dirty kafirs. Humiliation is a central part of the Mohammedan treatment of the despised KUFAAR.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Mortimer–and the homosexual rape of his guards would be acceptable since it is intended to humiliate Infidels.
Irene Brekelmans says
PAUL SILAS. I know you are right in the last days there will come savage times. They have let it go too long, but there would have been a clash anyway, but smaller in the beginning.
Those people are in a frenzy, I saw them how they behaved in the Universities with Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, and it was appalling,I admire them for keeping their calm and respect, I could not have done it.
And those students are our future !!! And how come there are so many moslim students in your AmericanUniversities, they only profit of everything and anything. I have never seen and heard such asocial behaviour. All about political correctness but no free speech anymore. And hear the females roar.
Liberation, but where are the American feminists? Lost forever !
Robert says
Islam is a scourge or whip that the Lord God Almighty uses, just like he used Babylon, the Medes & the Persians and other proud, arrogant, immoral, militaristic conquerors in the past to punish his people, when they wander away from him.
Islam, like those other ‘scourge’ nations, is not simply acting on its own volition; it is sovereignly governed by the LORD, who establishes the path taken by Islam. In other words, Islam is a tool in the hands of the LORD. By an eternal decree that cannot be broken, God determined the course of Islam; in other words, Islam is not a ‘free agent,’ simply doing as it pleases, perfectly free from the will of God. God has decreed what Islam has done, is doing, and will do.
However, on the great and terrible Day of Judgment, Islam won’t get a free hall pass because it was a tool that God used for his own purposes. God will hold Islam accountable in the same way that God held accountable (and punished) other nations that God used as a scourge.
According to the revelation of God’s word, the wicked do precisely as they please. Joseph’s brothers were pleased to sell their brother into slavery — they did what they wanted to do — and, so, they were moral agents who were fully responsible for the sins they committed on their own. In the same way, Islam does as it pleases and will be judged accordingly.
God will judge the founder of Islam for all the sins committed by him and everyone else who based their life on his teaching; and God will judge each person who adheres to Islam — God will judge all the sins committed by individual adherents. Every sinful act, word, and desire will be judged by God using his absolute, universal, perfect moral standard. He will judge with equity; he won’t make any mistakes.
But, then, God will judge everyone who rejects him and his Son. It won’t just be Muslims who will duck, and run for cover when Christ returns. God will hold all mankind accountable who rebelled against him.
The only hope for sinful rebels is the Saviour, Jesus Christ. He is the only person who lived a good life, pleasing God by perfectly fulfilling God’s will from the moment of conception to final breath. He shed his blood as the atoning sacrifice that propitiates the wrath of God against sin and his righteousness is imputed to all those who trust in him, not in themselves. Everyone who trusts in him, and only him, will be saved from the judgment of God.
Paul N Silas says
A great presentation of The Gospel Robert. I’m guessing that your theological background is Reformed like mine.
A humble amen and God bless to you
Robert says
Ha ha! I think of myself first and foremost as biblical, and then Reformed.
Thought_Weaver says
Everything that you say is fine even though I do not agree with you. But then comes things like “Everyone who trusts in him, and only him, will be saved from the judgment of God.” Oh! C’mmon. Get over this ‘My Way or the High Way mentality’. If a so called god does exist, is he so bloody narrow minded as you portray him to be? A true just god would reward humans on how much GOOD they have inside their hearts rather than how much FAITH they have. There are faithfuls even among murderers, rapists, pedophiles and what not. So, according to you these despicable humans, all get a free pass eh? I don’t know what kind of a ‘reformed biblical self’ you guys are talking about. It is time we take matters into our own hands in combatting Islamization of our countries instead of leaving everything on a so called god.
You said “In other words, Islam is a tool in the hands of the LORD”
You did not leave even your own god out of this. According to you it is the same god who is perpetuating such undpeakable horrors on us by means of Islam. What on earth??????
Robert says
Hi Thought_Weaver,
Thanks for your thoughtful comments. They were interesting to read and ponder. Obviously, you mulled over what I had written. I realize that my comments must seems hard to digest, for those who are (a) unfamiliar with the biblical worldview or (b) know something about it, but have chosen another path. The Bible promotes a heavy, deep, and earnest vision of things, which is in sharp contrast to the way our culture currently operates.
The Only Way — Is It Narrow Minded To Say So?
You take umbrage to the statement made by the Lord Jesus Christ, ‘I am the way, the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, except through me.’ You characterized it as too narrow. But that’s precisely the type of claim that the one and only true God would make; he would state that he’s the only One. Why would he pretend otherwise?
Since there are no other gods, and since’s he’s the only true God, and since the only way to eternal life with him is by way of the means he provides, then it’s a sign of his goodness that he clearly states: I am the only way to heaven. Any other message would be false.
If a bridge across a deep canyon was washed out, and a sign warned you about the wash out, but instructed you to take another bridge, which was the only available route across the canyon, then you wouldn’t respond by saying: ‘The Public Works department that posted that sign are too narrow.’ If there’s only one route, then it’s not narrow to state that fact clearly and persuasively.
Is The Human Heart Good?
You also state that God should reward people for the goodness within their hearts. And, you’re right — God would reward people for the good within them. But that’s the crux of the problem. The human heart isn’t full of goodness; it’s full of lots of things, none of which can be categorized under the label ‘good.’ A quick inventory of our heart tells us that there is something seriously wrong with human nature.
Based on your criteria, God ought to reward each person for the content of his or her heart. Fine. I agree — but, more important, God agrees with you, too. He does ‘reward’ people for what goes on in their heart. But you are mistaken when you assert that the human heart is full of goodness.
Jesus observed that most of the ills of the world stem from the human heart. Jesus knew what lay within the heart heart; no one needed to inform him of the fact that the human heart was morally corrupt; he knew it for himself (John 2.24). He said, ‘For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander. These are what defile a person.’ (Matthew 15.19). Psalm 51 and Romans 3.10-18 also discuss the sad fact that human nature has gone rotten.
Since God does ‘reward’ people for the content of their heart, then the reward is not the one you anticipated. Because God treats everyone with justice (with one exception, which I’ll get to in a moment). And God’s justice dictates that people who transgress the moral law must be punished for their transgressions. God is perfectly just to hold a person accountable for the sin they’ve committed. In fact, he’d be unjust to let them get off ‘scott free.’
God Is Not The Author of Evil
You suggest that I stated that God perpetuates unspeakable horror. Maybe I didn’t express myself clearly enough. God is sovereign over everything, including the lives of evil persons and nations and empires, but he is not the author of evil. God is holy (x3), and cannot do evil, since he is purely good, righteous, and beyond error. The upshot is, he doesn’t do the bad things that he ordains. Each person is a moral agent, responsible for his or her own actions.
Robert says
I said in an earlier post, that God treats everyone with justice, with one exception. The one exception is this: God shows mercy to some. Instead of condemning them for their sins, God forgives them.
God takes the sin of those whom he saves, and places the burden of their sin on his Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. So, it’s Jesus who suffers the punishment, not the people. Meanwhile, they receive God’s mercy and forgiveness.
The transaction is called the Great Exchange, because the sins of God’s people are put on Jesus; and Jesus’s perfect moral record is given to God’s people in exchange. Jesus suffers the wrath and curse of God for the sins, and God’s people enjoy the blessings of having a spotless moral record, thanks to Jesus, the only perfect person.
The Bible says, ‘For our sake he (that is, God the Father) made him (Jesus) to be sin who knew no sin, so that in him (Jesus) we might become the righteousness of God.’
God the Father made Jesus, who was morally perfect, to bear the burden of sin; and God the Father took the perfect moral goodness of Jesus and counted it in the sinner’s favour.
Those who know that they are morally imperfect and stand condemned before God, but who trust that Jesus suffered the penalty of the sin on their behalf, will be saved from the wrath of God’s perfect moral judgment.
Thought_Weaver says
Hi! Robert. I know where this is all going to lead up to. To explain Jesus you will be using the Bible and vice-versa. I am not saying that Jesus, if he indeed existed was a bad person. His motives might have been to reform the moral and social fabric of his times. He must have been a visionary whose thoughts and ideas might have been hijacked, manipulated and twisted to suit some people’s selfish need for power over the masses. Now, let’s leave that aside for a while. Just answer my one question.
Say, hypothetically, I am too good a person and never sinned. And I am not a Christian. Am I heaven or hellbound?.
Robert says
Hi Thought_Weaver,
Sorry I’m not able to reply to you directly, I don’t see a reply button on your comment. So, replying indirectly is the next best thing.
You asked if you, a good person who never sinned, would go to heaven or hell after you die.
Good question. Tough answer.
According to God’s revealed word, no one is good; not one person. Psalm 51 and Romans 3 spell that truth out in stark detail. We’ve all gone astray; we’ve all fallen short of God’s perfect moral standard. Everyone of us.
God judges us by a perfect moral standard: his own holy nature and character, as revealed in the moral Law, encapsulated in the Ten Commandments.
Jesus taught that God judges, not only our words and actions, but our thoughts, desires, and intents, too. To illustrate his point, he said that if a man looks at a woman (or another man, for the same sex folks) with lust, he has committed adultery with her in his heart. He doesn’t need to commit the act physically to be guilty of the sin; he simply needs to fantasize about it.
That poses a problem. Based on this standard, no one is good or free from sin. We’ve all broken the moral code. We’ve all sinned. We’ve all said and done and fantasized about things that are sinful.
That means, that everyone who lives their life without Jesus Christ, will miss out on heaven.
Jesus came to save those condemned under the law, by becoming a curse himself, instead of sinners. He came to set the captives free — those who are captive to sin.
Thought_Weaver says
@Robert
It is amazing how you know so much. You know exactly how god thinks, what he intends to do, what sort of punishments he has in store for the grave, unpardonable, henious, despicable, inhuman, horrendous mistake of not accepting Jesus as the lord. I am in awe with the kind of knowledge you possess.
Now, will I be right in saying that you got this wealth of knowledge from the Bible? And that everything in the Bible is true because Jesus said it? And again Jesus is to be believed because it says so in the Bible. Wow! this circular logic is incredible.
You know, we never hold back while criticising Islam for it being a *supremacist* ideology. You my friend have shown that Christianity is no different. So what if you don’t kill infidels? so what if you don’t kill gays? So what if you don’t subdue women as much as the Muslims do? If Judaism and Christianity did not have such objectionable content then I don’t think Mohammad would have gotten the base for his twisted ideas in the first place. Christians came up with the New Testament because many could not explain away the absurdities and gore of the Old Testament. May be it is time for a much more *secular version* of the Bible. Most Christians are inherently good human beings. But as long as the Bible exists as it is, we will see more and more people growing up with the kind of *moral* values, tolerance and understanding that you currently exhibit. Good luck.
Robert says
Thought_Weaver,
Which is it? Do I know what God thinks because I have some special ability to read God’s mind? Or do I know what he thinks because of the revelation of God in the Scriptures? I’m not sure which one you are criticizing. Maybe both, but it’s not clear.
Also, you seem to have a problem with divine revelation as a source of absolute, ultimate truth. But how else would someone obtain knowledge of the truth? Certainly not by scientific inquiry, which only works with the material world. Absolute, ultimate truth is immaterial and, therefore, beyond the reach of such investigation.
Then you make the mistake of equating Christian claims with Islamic claims. It’s easy to make glib comparisons. But it indicates you haven’t actually examined the subject with any degree of seriousness. I’d urge you to conduct an earnest study of the two religions — compare and contrast the Christian worldview with the Islamic one. There are many studies that look at key doctrines of the two religions. They are superficially the same, but profoundly different.
Your take on the origins of the New Testament makes sense only if you’ve never studied the NT at a systematic level. I’ve heard so many people say the same thing as you’ve just stated. But when pressed to provide clear examples of what they mean, they give examples that fall apart under closer examination. For two thousand years, Christian scholars have studied the difficult passages of the Old and New Testaments, going over the problem texts with a fine-tooth comb. If you’re truly interested in learning the solutions to these textual and doctrinal issues, start reading scholars who have wrestled with these texts.
Finally, you state: ‘But as long as the Bible exists as it is, we will see more and more people growing up with the kind of *moral* values, tolerance and understanding that you currently exhibit.’ I wish I had a dollar for every atheist who makes this assertion. They assume that atheism is morally superior.
Would you please explain why the worst atrocities against mankind in the 20th century were perpetrated by atheistic governments? Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, and Maoist China killed millions and millions of people. Also, the atheistic feminist movement which has fostered the abortion movement has murdered millions of infants in the womb — and they recently celebrated all those murders of innocent life in a Twitter campaign.
If you wish to take the moral high ground, then start by condemning the atrocities committed by atheists.
gravenimage says
The idea that it is God who is inflicting the horror of Islam on us is pretty questionable. We have free will, and can use it for good *or* evil.
dumbledoresarmy says
so you believe that God actively arranged for Islam to arise… thus ensuring that millions upon millions of people would be butchered, horribly, long before the gospel could ever be preached to them???
Do you believe that the Armenian Christians were so wicked and disobedient – one may note that there is NO suggestion that they were apostate/ decadent/ corrupt/ particularly immoral or disbelieving – that they *deserved* to be slaughtered by the hundreds of thousands, by Muslims?
Since mass-murderous Jihad has been going on for 1400 years non-stop, with for example scores of millions of victims in India and central Asia, not to mention Africa, you seem to assume that God prefers and has always preferred for people to be butchered wholesale – and then enslaved within Islam, without EVER getting a chance to hear the gospel preached – rather than be redeemed.
The rise and spread of Islam *massively* delayed and hindered the evangelising of vast swathes of the planet, and *wiped out* the Christian presence entirely from the whole of North Africa, for over a thousand years. In what conceivable way can you argue that *that* was a good thing, or a demonstration of the love and justice of a just and loving God?
You seem to assume that the whole of Christendom for the past 1400 years *deserved* to be constantly on the very brink of being wholly annihilated; that God is much more interested in punishing and killing, than in anything else.
It isn’t ‘sanctification’ if you are kidnapped, raped until you go out of your mind, and then have your throat slit; or if you survive as a piece of meat, enduring living death and repeated rape in a harem, and bear children that are brainwashed into Islam from day one, children that will never hear the gospel and are pickled in hate by their rapist father – who *despises* you because you were born a Christian.
A Syrian Christian girl was seized by jihadis. They raped her and rraped her and raped her until she went insane; then they killed her. Can you in any way claim that God’s sovereign will decreed this, that He ordained it, using the rapist jihadi kidnappers as his ‘instruments’, his flogging-whip, in order to punish her, or her family, for being insufficiently pious? Or that because she was Syrian Catholic, she wasn’t a real Christian, and deserved everything she got? That this was God’s just punishment for her not being the right kind of Believer?
Robert says
Hi dumbledoresarmy, I understand your frustration. You think I mean to say that God is okay with Islamic oppression because I stated that God ordains events, including the rise of Islam. If that were true, then you’d have every right to reject Christianity.
But that’s not what I said; and it’s certainly not what the Bible teaches. God is not okay with Islam, in the same way that he condemned other evil empires before, such as Babylon.
Everyone who does wicked will be held accountable for their wickedness. The Jihads will answer for every crime they commit.
I’m certainly not ignorant of the countless atrocities committed by Islam. For several years now, I’ve been studying Islam — it’s doctrines, practices, and history. Not because I love it; but because I want to know as much as I can stomach about our greatest opponent. So, I’ve read about the death and destruction wrought by Islam wherever it has gone — the Middle East, North Africa, Portugal, Spain, Southern France, the coast of Italy, the Balkans, Asia Minor, Malta, Cyprus, India, Afghanistan, etc, etc, etc.
I know about the abduction of non-Muslim boys and girls, their sexual grooming at the hands of depraved Islamic stewards, the forced conversion and training of the boys to be zealous soldiers in the Islamic armies of conquest, the forced conversion and training of the girls to be compliant sex slaves to the elite class in the Islamic regime.
I know how Islam basically outlawed any other religion, allowing other religions to ‘exist’ in private under the threat of swift and immediate destruction if any of its adherents stepped out of line. Islam persecuted Jews and Christians relentlessly — even when there was ‘peace,’ it was really only the peace that comes after a master beats his slave into subdued silence.
Yes, I know about the harems — velvet prisons where sex slaves were routinely raped and impregnated by their merciless Islamic masters. I’ve read the sick, twisted history of the Sultans. Again, not because it’s enjoyable — but because the enemy needs to be know in all his ugly, depraved truth.
And I still maintain that all of these men are now under lock and key in God’s impregnable prison house, where they await the Final Judgment.
gravenimage says
Robert, your impression that Dumbledore’s Army is not familiar with the Bible is *much* mistaken. She is a serious scholar and a devout Christian. She does not reject Christianity–she rejects your dark vision of it.
And she is not “frustrated”, either, in opposing your claim that it is God who is behind the horrors of Islam, rather than man exercising error and wickedness.
Robert says
Hi gravenimage,
I’m not sure how you arrived at the idea that I thought she didn’t know the Bible? Did I make that statement?
Also, I’m glad to hear she’s a serious scholar. It’s good to hear she doesn’t reject Christianity, but is a devout Christian. That’s good news.
I would urge her, since she is a serious scholar and devout Christian, to read the account of the life of Joseph, found in Genesis. She should study especially Genesis 50.15-21. The climax of the account comes in verse 20, when Joseph addresses his brother and declares: ‘As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.’
Joseph understands that his brothers are afraid that Joseph will retaliate against them, now that their father is dead. They had sold him into slavery and they believed he might strike back in vengeance. But Joseph counters their thoughts with an extraordinary explanation. He says what they did because they were wicked, God ordained for good.
I’m not disputing the fact that men commit atrocities. Clearly, they do. Anyhow, this isn’t the best forum to discuss these weighty matters.
JMB says
But our Day of Shame, also known as the Cronulla Beach Riot of 2005 is still keeping this beautiful (local for me) beach precinct for the most part free of Muslims.
gravenimage says
Good, JMB.
Eric Jones says
This older youth is a predator and should be dealt with accordingly. I don’t know if there is a death penalty in Australia. This older youth deserves it. If not the death penalty then life imprisonment in a psychiatric facility under drugs that keep him subdued. This older youth is clearly sociopathic. There is no rehab for him.
I hope the prison guards are not put into a situation where extrem measures are required to deal with this older youth.
Eric
gravenimage says
Australia: Muslim teen accused of murder threatens to rape and murder prison guards in the name of Allah
………………………….
This is what a good Muslim is like.
Matthieu Baudin says
I wonder whether there was any reason why the two minors chose to murder a Muslim in an overwhelmingly non Muslim country? Was it a (religiously inspired) random attack or was there an added personal element against the victim in this case.
dumbledoresarmy says
Maybe they viewed him as an apostate, or as the wrong kind of Muslim.
gravenimage says
I noticed that, as well. There is nothing more Islamic than Muslims killing other Muslims, though. As noted, he may have been considered a “heretic”–i.e., the wrong sect–or else an apostate or just “insufficiently Islamic”.