A complete retreat from his campaign vow to speak honestly about the motivating ideology behind the global jihad threat, and from his repeated use of the phrase (which is imperfect itself, but better than the denial and willful ignorance of Bush and Obama) early in his presidency. No force can defeat an enemy it does not understand, much less one it refuses to understand, and here we are again.
“‘The president will call it whatever he wants to call it,’ said McMaster said on ABC’s ‘This Week.’ ‘But I think it’s important that, whatever we call it, we recognize that [extremists] are not religious people.'”
Not religious people? They certainly think they are. How does the imam McMaster know that they aren’t? A sampling:
“Jihad was a way of life for the Pious Predecessors (Salaf-us-Salih), and the Prophet (SAWS) was a master of the Mujahideen and a model for fortunate inexperienced people. The total number of military excursions which he (SAWS) accompanied was 27. He himself fought in nine of these; namely Badr; Uhud, Al-Muraysi, The Trench, Qurayzah, Khaybar, The Conquest of Makkah, Hunayn and Taif . . . This means that the Messenger of Allah (SAWS) used to go out on military expeditions or send out an army at least every two months.” — Abdullah Azzam, co-founder of al-Qaeda, Join the Caravan, p. 30
“If we follow the rules of interpretation developed from the classical science of Koranic interpretation, it is not possible to condemn terrorism in religious terms. It remains completely true to the classical rules in its evolution of sanctity for its own justification. This is where the secret of its theological strength lies.” — Egyptian scholar Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd
“Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims. Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion.” — Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his fellow 9/11 defendants
“Allah on 480 occasions in the Holy Koran extols Muslims to wage jihad. We only fulfil God’s orders. Only jihad can bring peace to the world.” — Taliban terrorist Baitullah Mehsud
“Jihad, holy fighting in Allah’s course, with full force of numbers and weaponry, is given the utmost importance in Islam….By jihad, Islam is established….By abandoning jihad, may Allah protect us from that, Islam is destroyed, and Muslims go into inferior position, their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligation and duty in Islam on every Muslim.” — Times Square car bomb terrorist Faisal Shahzad
“So step by step I became a religiously devout Muslim, Mujahid — meaning one who participates in jihad.” — Little Rock, Arkansas terrorist murderer Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad
“And now, after mastering the English language, learning how to build explosives, and continuous planning to target the infidel Americans, it is time for Jihad.” — Texas terrorist bomber Khalid Aldawsari
“McMaster suggests Trump won’t say ‘radical Islamic terrorism’ in speech,” by Max Greenwood, The Hill, May 20, 2017:
White House national security adviser H.R. McMaster suggested that President Trump may abandon the phrase “radical Islamic terrorism” in a scheduled speech in Saudi Arabia on Sunday.
“The president will call it whatever he wants to call it,” McMaster said on ABC’s “This Week.” “But I think it’s important that, whatever we call it, we recognize that [extremists] are not religious people. And, in fact, these enemies of all civilizations, what they want to do is to cloak their criminal behavior under this fall idea of some kind of religious war.”
“But I think what the president will point out is the vast majority – the vast majority of victims from these people are Muslims. And of course the Muslim world is very cognizant of that, having born witness to and experienced directly this humanitarian catastrophe that’s going on across the greater Middle East and beyond.”
Trump frequently used the phrase “radical Islamic terror” on the campaign trail to describe Islamist extremists and militant groups. But the term has historically been avoided by presidents, including George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
In fact, McMaster himself has urged the president to refrain from using the phrase, arguing that violent extremists, such as ISIS militants, push a perverse view of Islam and that the phrase “radical Islamic terror” ultimately hinders U.S. goals, according to CNN.
In his speech on Sunday, Trump is expected to cast the fight against extremism as a “battle between good and evil,” rather than a religious war, while calling for unity with allies in the Islamic world.
Rev g says
If jihadi’s aren’t religious, why do they use a term from the quran, and act in accordance?
Come on, Trump needs to axe this guy, but not in the Islamic religious way.
Bruce Crichton says
Correct. McMaster is a witless worm.
Don Foss says
He knows damn well, but in his position he has to play the long game. We’re trying to get these people to help now that they are of a mind to. Gotta play our own taqiyya.
Jayke says
It is hard to believe that McMaster is so stupid.
Bruce Crichton says
Not so much stupid as purposefully dishonest.
Don Foss says
For good reason.
mortimer says
McMASTER IS ABSURD to say that Caliph Abu Bakr al Baghdadi is ‘NOT RELIGIOUS’. At what ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY did McMaster get his BA, MA and PhD in Islamic studies?
Caliph Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi, who is the ISIS chief and the caliph of the Islamic State, is apparently the first Islamic Studies PhD from a Muslim background who has no idea about Islam.
Al-Baghdadi, who has obtained BA, MA and PhD degrees in Islamic studies from the Islamic University in Baghdad, has been condemned as a person who knows nothing about Islam, and as the head of an organization that has nothing to do with Islam.
The professors from the Islamic University of Baghdad, however, do not agree. They taught the caliph and believe his credentials and doctrines are sound.
“If a person who has a PhD in Islamic studies and does nothing but study the Islamic scriptures knows nothing about Islam, then who does?” questioned al-Baghdadi’s main teacher from the Islamic University, preferring to remain anonymous since the fatwa against ISIS and its chief puts his reputation into jeopardy.
“The wine-sipping Muslims, those hedonistic adulterers will tell the world what true Islam is? Obama and Cameron know more about Islam than the faculty of Islamic studies at the Islamic University in Baghdad?” the professor bellowed with rage, while talking to a journalist.
Another professor, who had taught al-Baghdadi for his BA, said off the record that the ISIS caliph was an ardent student.
“He had this obsession with Islamic studies. I used to tell him to go out and have some fun sometimes. But his idea of fun wasn’t too human friendly,” the professor said. “In any case he was a top student. One of the best I’ve ever had. Had the entire syllabus on his finger tips – to be honest, he knew more about Islamic studies than most of the professors.”
“While you can question whether they are humans or not, there is no doubt that ISIS, including Abu Bakr (al Baghdadi), are indeed bona fide Muslims,” concluded the ISIS caliph’s PhD professor.
jewdog says
Trump is Obama with enforced immigration laws.
Carolyne says
Trump may be what you say he is, or he might just recognize what is possible to do at this time. But I do know this. Mr, Trump is the closest thing we have to a person in authority who recognizes we have a problem with Islam and is trying to do something about it. The choice was between him and Hillary Clinton–a woman who has a Muslim as her closest “aide” and has taken millions of dollars from Saudi. gave 20% of our uranium to Russia and was careless with our nation’s secrets, or alternatively was a traitor. Mr. Trump is not perfect in his understanding of Islam, but I believe he is willing to learn and take action.
The choice was between Mr. Trump and Hillary Clinton. I assume you would have preferred Hillary Clinton. Those of us who are Conservative continually shoot ourselves in th foot and then complain about it. I would rather have a person who is willing and will learn than a traitor as President. We need to stop trying to sabotage Mr. Trump. Would you prefer Pence? Would you prefer Paul Ryan as President. That is where this is headed if we do not support Mr. Trump’s Presidency.
We must stop shooting ourselves in the foot. We will never agree on everything Mr. Trump does, but he is the closest thing we have for saving our country.
JayT says
I wonder what McMasters time table is on converting Trump to a walking, talking, carbon copy of Obama when the subject of Islam comes up.
Demsci says
YES! And it is not as if in return, a sort of grateful leftist segment of the population, let alone Muslims around the world, will be nicer and less vitriolic against him. Trump has nothing to gain in this way.
And him being more like Steve Bannon and us advising him to be, namely tough on all of Islam and Muslims, in a truthful, albeit somehow tactful way,
by the same token, won’t be a disadvantage to him, because already he is so massively attacked by the leftists, Muslims and Mainstream Media, no matter what he says and does.
So McMaster’s tactics and advice avail Trump NOTHING. It is the advice of Bannon, Gloria, Spencer, David Wood, Jay Smith and people like us that would solidify his legacy, not this parroting of Bush and Obama.
Demsci says
Sorry, Gloria is what spelling control made of GORKA (Sebastian).
Demsci says
Gloria should be (Sebastian)) Gorka.
David, Thailand says
Must be a coincidence that Obama’s tactical appointees nobbled Flynn, with McMasters waiting to replace him. Looks like Trump can trust nobody, and in regard to Islam not even himself.
RAB says
So Trump turns out to be just one more useful idiot for Islam. How sad! How tragic! Game over?
JawsV says
This is not the President I voted for.
Carolyne says
Then perhaps you should have voted for Hillary Clinton and her mob of thugs, including being on the payroll of Saudi Arabia. Would t hat have been so much better than Mr. Trump? Think what you are saying, man.
gravenimage says
True, Carolyne.
Don Foss says
Nope, game NOT over. Game just beginning. And if you think our president should saunter into the KSA give it to the Islamic world they way we do here on Spenser’s site, you’re a nut. Trump and his team are walking a tight rope and balancing as well as they can to get shit done, productively. Positive action. Isn’t that the bottom line? Get the Islamic world to reject the most religious of their tribe and work with us on rooting these terrorists out? You think we’re going to help ourselves by going in with guns blazing about what you and I know about Islamic doctrine and shove it down their throats? He’s playing this game just right so far. Yesterday was the most successful and hopeful day in our fight against terror we have had yet.
mortimer says
DOES McMASTER KNOW MORE ABOUT ISLAM THAN SAUDI SHEIKHS???
A LEADING SAUDI CLERIC ENDORSES ISIS DOCTRINES – Sheikh Adel al-Kalbani
A former imam of the Grand Mosque in Mecca, Sheikh Adel al-Kalbani, has said that the Islamic State (IS) group follows the same brand of Islam as officially espoused by Saudi Arabia.
“We follow the same thought [as IS] but apply it in a refined way,” he said. “They draw their ideas from what is written in our own books, from our own principles.”
The cleric said that “we do not criticise the thought on which it (IS) is based”.
In his MBC interview, which was broadcast on 22 January, Kalbani said IS and Salafists in Saudi Arabia shared the same opinion on apostasy, which is that those who leave Islam should be executed.
Kalbani also spoke about the killing of journalists by IS, including Americans James Foley and Steven Sotloff, which drew global condemnation in September 2014.
He said “their blood was shed according to Salafist fatwas (religious edicts) not outside the Salafist framework.”
Over the years, Sheikh Adel al-Kalbani’s has said that the Islamic State is a “true product of Salafism”, that Shi’ites are “apostates” and he rejoiced that Saudi Arabia “shelters [him] from hearing church bells ringing.”
underbed cat says
Well when Trump referred to Islam as one of the world’s great religions. I gasped. But I had noticed the first visit Trump made to the White House to meet with the outgoing president, I viewed a sort of star struck Trump. I felt ill as ease and now with his latest comments…trip to Saudi Arabia and signing or agreeing to a arms deal, not quite sure…it does not look good. I think Trump just “islamizied ” the U.S.. I am sickened to feel so deceived and hope that he pulls out of this deal and restricts any further influence. But noticing the “golden chairs” and design he has in his home….should have been a clue he likes glitz shine. I have had enough of the influence and I am convinced he is not a person who has examined the 9/11 doctrine..that lead to point. islam is isis, and all the other terror groups around.
billybob says
Money trumps integrity. Trump has just made an enormous amount of money for US arms manufacturers.
Don Foss says
This is a poker game with a big effing pot at stake. I’m putting my money on Trump. He knows how to play smart.
Steve Klein says
‘GOP Israel chief: Trump unlikely to announce embassy move during visit’
Marc Zell doesn’t believe president will use trip to Jerusalem to fulfill campaign pledge to relocate US missionBY TAMAR PILEGGI
May 21, 2017, 12:50 pm
Times of Israel says: “The Palestinians and the Arab world have fiercely opposed a potential relocation of the US embassy, repeatedly warning that it could spark violence in the region.”
Then the mighty U.S. is yet again bowing to the will of Islam over doing what is right.
Moshe says
President Trump and General MacMaster are right not to use language and terminology that would insult his hosts in Saudi Arabia — and offend the many Sunni leaders that are the King’s guests for this important Arab summit. The goal today is formation of a regional alliance against an aggressive Iran and an Iran-supported militant “Shia Crescent” across Syria.
A key part of this effort is sufficient American assurances (including a gracious veer of language even if a verbal sleight-of-land) to enable Saudi leaders to back away from cryptic ISIS support without exposing the Kingdom to blow-back from radical Sunni factions.
Let’s face a harsh truth: Trump faces a strategic Catch-22. Former President Obama’s empowering of Iran has created a strategic dilemma for the West as well as for the Sunni world and for Israel. This is the tragic and perilous world that President Trump has inherited. But like it or not, he needs to play the cards he has been dealt, and the American hand is not strong.
Western mainstream media have not and will not connect the dots between former President Obama’s empowerment/enrichment of Shia radicalism and a pending maelstrom of violence and war in the Middle East, and yet these connections are clear.
Today’s diplomatic language in Saudi Arabia represents a last-minute effort to avoid a conflagation for which Obama’s reckless policies are largely responsible but for which Trump will nevertheless be blamed. These are tragic times.
m says
Moshe,
The most cogent reply here. Congrats
Steve Klein says
“When President Trump arrives in Riyadh this week, he will lay out his vision for a new regional security architecture White House officials call an “Arab NATO,” to guide the ++++fight against (Islamic) terrorism++++ and push back against Iran. As a cornerstone of the plan, Trump will also announce one of the largest arms-sales deals in history….”
Saudi Arabia is one of the preeminent state sponsors and exporters of international terrorism. Did you read Hugh Fitzgerald’s piece “Shut Up and Deal, or Brittle Man, You’ve Had a Dizzy May”?
Fitzgerald: Why would any Infidel leader want to help create a “united Muslim front,” instead of exploiting signs of disarray within the Camp of Islam? Why can’t Trump see the benefit of sectarian fissures, mainly between Sunni and Shia, and now on violent display in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Lebanon, Pakistan? Surely Donald Trump remembers the Iran-Iraq War (1980-88), that went on for eight years, and consumed the aggressive energies of both sides. Wasn’t the Iran-Iraq War a good thing? Didn’t it use up men, materiel, money, and morale, of both Iran and Iraq? And what about the ethnic conflict, within Islam, of non-Arabs resentful of the way that Islam is a vehicle for Arab supremacism, requiring a kind of ideal “arabization”? The Berbers in North Africa have suffered cultural imperialism at the hands of the Arabs, who have tried intermittently to get them to abandon their Berber language and culture, in a campaign of forced arabization. The Kurds in Iraq suffered, under Saddam Hussein’s Arabs, a still worse form of arabization; the Arabs killed 182,000 Kurds, and then Arabs were moved into formerly Kurdish-populated villages. And how many Muslims elsewhere have wanted, because Arabs are superior to non-Arabs in the Islamic pecking order, to claim a pseudo-Arab identity, as in Pakistan, where so many take on the name “Sayyid” (meaning a descendant of the Prophet)? While Muslims are called the “best of peoples” in the Qur’an, it is clear that the Arabs are the “best of Muslims.” For the Qur’an was dictated in Arabic, to an Arab, the Prophet Muhammad. Muslims must face toward Mecca, in western Arabia, five times a day, and ideally copy the dress, mores, and customs of 7th century Arabs. And until recently, the Qur’an was to be read only in Arabic and still, today, tens of millions of madrasa students read, recite, memorize the Qur’an in Arabic, even when they can hardly understand the language.
Is Donald Trump aware of this history? What makes him think the West has more to gain from a “united” Muslim world than from one that is divided against itself, in either sectarian or ethnic conflict? How would the West suffer if Saudi Arabia and Iran, instead of fighting through proxies, engaged in a full-scale war? And why wouldn’t the West have far more to gain if the Kurds managed to establish an independent Kurdistan on territory that was formerly part of Iraq, Syria, Iran, and Turkey? A Kurdish state would certainly be loyal to its indispensable American ally, a good deal more loyal than Erdogan’s Turkey, though the latter is a member of, and receives considerable benefits from, NATO. While re-islamizing and de-kemalizing Turkey, Erdogan has also treated his Western allies with considerable disdain. He demanded that the American government ignore its own legal procedures and simply hand over Fethulleh Gulen to Ankara, and he bitterly denounced the Americans when they refused. In Germany, where Erdogan’s men were prevented from holding a referendum among local Turks on Erdogan’s “reforms” — the ones that will make it possible for him to stay in power until 2029 — he repeatedly denounced German officials as “Nazis.” Not exactly what one expects from a NATO ally. In his warm welcome to Erdogan in early May, Trump decided to overlook all that. Perhaps he was already thinking ahead to his big reveal in Riyadh, later in the month….
Demsci says
Despite a lot of respect for your explanation, I disagree. Oh, I do see the need of non-insulting, but not for twisting the truth about Islam as is shown from the pro-Democratic Western perspective by Robert Spencer et al.
If respectful language is needed, why not acknowledge that the full democratic system is our way, and some dictatorial ideology is the way of and for Muslims? We can even admit the drawbacks of the full Democratic system and the advantages of autocratic systems. As long as we are allowed to fully defend our own full democratic system by pointing out where Islam is clearly anti-Democratic.
And Muslims then, to their hearts content, may and will criticize the godless full Democratic system.
But now? All this pretense as if Islam is somehow beneficial, neutral, largely mysterious, in regard to our, in our opinion, much better political system, and so called perverting by the most autocratic Muslims is disgusting. It is a show of ignorance or deliberate lying.
Rev g says
A full democratic system? Then why is Trump potus? Why no referendum on Obmacare, etc?
Demsci says
Improvement is possible, but the 5 pillars of Democracy are to a high level accounted for in America and the West, much more than in Islamic and other dictatorial countries.
they are: Constitutional State, Free elections, separation of state and church, freedom of the individual and freedom of speech.
There are lists of countries with gradations of democracy and I am in favor of the countries on the top of that list.
Rev G says
America is most definitely not a full democracy, by design. That was my point.
gravenimage says
Moshe, the Saudis–the main force behind 9/11–are *not* our allies.
And if they are truly opposed to violent Jihad–which they are not–why would they be insulted if it was mentioned?
Don Foss says
Agree…100%.
Steve Klein says
Dennis Kucinich on Fox & Friends this morning. Kucinich talked about a ‘red flashing light’, as Saudi Arabia has been financing al-Qaeda and Islamic State. I believe it was Clayton Morris who asked Kucinich, “Isn’t there a difference between wealthy individuals in Saudi Arabia and the government of Saudi Arabia?”
Good grief.
Krazy Kafir says
Very disappointing that Trump picked General McDhimmi.
dumbledoresarmy says
Yes. Disappointing, and demoralising.
JawsV says
Anyone else feel sickened watching Trump, Tillerson and some other WH dude participating in the Sword Dance? They looked like such Dhimmis.
Steve Klein says
Israel National News: ‘Trump takes part in traditional ardha dance in Saudi Arabia’
I Googled it: Ardah (Arabic: العرضة / ALA-LC: al-‘arḍah) is a type of folkloric dance in Arabia. The dance is performed with two rows of men opposite of one another, each of whom may or may not be wielding a sword or cane, and is accompanied by drums and spoken poetry.
Originally, the “ardah” was performed only by males of tribes of the central Nejd region before going to war, but nowadays it is done at celebrations, weddings, and national and cultural events by males all tribes, such as the Jenadriyah festival. There currently exists various types of ardah across the Arabian Peninsula….
JawsV says
“Before going to war?”
Are you sure? Because the NBC News this morning called it “a dance of peace after war.”
gravenimage says
Yeah–dances of peace always involve swords…
The purpose of the dance is to show the fighting strength of a tribe.
JayT says
JawsV says
Anyone else feel sickened watching Trump, Tillerson and some other WH dude participating in the Sword Dance? They looked like such Dhimmis.
——————————————————————————————————————————————
Not only do I agree with your sentiment, but you’ve got to wonder what his head of security was thinking after knowing what happened to the Russian Ambassador in Turkey courtesy of one of Erdogan’s close at hand bodyguards.
Let’s see, is it a good idea to have POTUS in easy reach of all those swords? It only takes one to go Jihad on Trump and his wife with sword in hand. Of course, in hindsight it wasn’t a concern, but it’s still stupid to let him in range of weapons ceremony or not.
JawsV says
You are so right, Jay T. Should have never happened. Dangerous and foolish.
Carolyne says
Moshe–you are correct. I am not one to cut off my nose to spite my face.
Don Foss says
Yea, they should have given the middle finger to the Saudis and kicked their stupid swords. Let them know how they really feel about them and their religion. Sheesh.
dumbledoresarmy says
I can only encourage ordinary jihadwatchers in America to keep on keeping on.
Go on educating your fellow Americans.
Join ACT for America, if you haven’t already.
Aim to have *more* ACT for America members, than there are Muslims in America; and aim to have *more* ACT for America local chapters, than there are mosques in America.
And keep up the pressure at every level of government and in every social network/ community organisation – from the local church and PTA, through to the County council, the State government, and the Federal government.
Never stop writing letters, emailing, phoning.
Donate to ACT for America… and support New English Review, and Jihadwatch; the more resources they have, the better the security – physical security for speakers, cybersecurity for websites – they can have, the better to go on educating and warning.
And… let the President know what you think. Politely, in simple and clear language, and as briefly and pointedly as you can. Polite, brief, to the point. Over and over and over and over and over, in thousands of Tweets, emails, letters.
Let him know you want Muslim immigration into the USA – from EVERY Islamic country – STOPPED, ASAP. Because.. “Got Muslims? Got Jihad” (use that as your signoff, in *every* communication with the President; use it every opportunity you can with *other* government/ official-type people, too).
Let him know you want Turkey OUT of NATO… and Fethulla Gulen and all his works and days, *removed* from the USA, root and branch.
Let him know that you’d be best pleased if he DIVESTED from any Mohammedan country where he has currently been doing business; that he should be setting an example by NOT doing business in/ investing in, Mohammedan countries.
Let him know you are deeply disappointed by the failure to keep a campaign promise, and move the USA embassy in Israel, from Tel AViv to Jerusalem, the capital city of Israel. State that you want that Embassy moved to Jerusalem, NOW.
And … in your involvement with ACT for America – be on the lookout, constantly, for *anyone* – in State or Federal politics, or any up-and-coming aspiring politician – who is both Islamosavvy and potentially able to throw their hat in the ring for the Presidency, in future. In five, ten, fifteen years.
Me, I would be trying to sound out Allen West (Col, ret.); and Tom Cotton, who is young, and a former soldier, might prove educable, if you get to work on him.
Whatever you do, do NOT give up.
Pong says
Correct me, if I am wrong, but you are an australian. I support 100% of your stetament, but it is about US. What about Australia? In order to be successful, people need to form a groop around one or more ideas. Such a group needs a publication for strategic and tactical ways of actions with some education material, as a less important line. JW and Bill Warner and others provide excellent education about islam.
Such publication should be pure political. Islam is a political movement and should be separated from any pretense of being a religion.
I can’t think of anything close to that in Australia. Q society is doing something, but not enough and I think they will not last due to financial and leadership problems.
gravenimage says
All great advice, DDA. Thank you.
Don Foss says
Got MY signed copies from Brigette Gabriel. Good reads.
hovno says
maybe lying is the only way to deal with islam
gravenimage says
I think telling the truth is a much better approach. Truth is on our side.
I don’t think McMaster is lying–I think he’s a fool.
Berengaria says
I will simply say that McMaster is NOT ON AMERICA’S SIDE, when Islam raises its ugly head.
McMaster appears to be similar to “PRAYER RUG BRENNAN”, but our President must be WARY of the General.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
H.R. McMaster is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Phil says
McMaster is alleged to be the Washington Post source leak inside his cabinet anyway. So this guy that loves to apologize to CAIR and ISNA for our national security efforts at targeting Muslims need to go BIG TIME!
Carolyne says
Who alleges this? The same person who wrote the New York Times article about the Comey “Memo?” It turns out that the third party who “read the memo” on the phone, didn’t read from the memo on the phone at all. He was saying what he remembered of a “Memo” he claimed he saw.
Do not believe the MSM. They are liars and are trying to present the US with a coup d’état and some of you are falling for it. .
UNCLE VLADDI says
I can hardly wait for McTraitor to be fired.
Trump’s speech was a TOTAL FAIL – and here’s both how and why:
Here’s what Trump SHOULD have said to the Saudis:
http://islamexposed.blogspot.ca/2017/05/what-trump-should-say-to-muslim-leaders.html
And Here’s what he DID say to the Saudis:
http://islamexposed.blogspot.ca/2017/05/summing-up-trumps-arab-summit-holy-shit.html