Mohammed Shafiq is the Chief Executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, which claims to be dedicated to combating “extremism.” In this interview with Sky News presenter Dermot Murnaghan after the Manchester jihad massacre, he does his best to equate jihad terrorist killers with the forces who oppose them (which he smears as “far right”), dissembles about Islamic teaching, and blames the Manchester attack on the British government’s foreign policy.
“We’re not going to let the terrorists succeed, and we’re not going to let the far-right, also, come to our city and divide us.”
Note the moral equivalence: there are the terrorists on one side, the “far-right” on the other, both seeking to divide people, and here is good old Mohammed Shafiq smack in the middle, the voice of sanity, the voice of reason, the voice of peace, the voice of unity. Shafiq doesn’t mention one all-important fact, and Murnaghan doesn’t challenge him on it: the “far-right” in Britain hasn’t killed anyone, isn’t plotting to do so, and isn’t condoning any violence. The death toll from Islamic jihad terrorism is 22 in Manchester, plus other violent attacks and plots in Britain, as well as 30,000 murderous jihad attacks around the world since 9/11. So Shafiq’s equivalence between the two is ridiculous. What is he trying to do? He is trying to defame and discredit those who are calling attention to the reality of jihad activity in Britain, and its motivating ideology. If he succeeds, jihad activity will go on in Britain while everyone is too afraid of being labeled “far-right” or “Islamophobic” to raise their voices in protest. And that is exactly what is happening now.
“No faith in this world encourages the brutal massacre of children as we saw Monday night. No faith! And if that was what my faith was teaching, I wouldn’t want to be in it, either.”
In reality, a hadith depicts Muhammad reacting with savage indifference to the killing of children by the Muslims: “It is reported on the authority of Sa’b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.” (Sahih Muslim 4321)
These children were collateral damage of the raid, just as they today might be collateral damage of a jihad bombing such as the one we saw in Manchester Monday night— and Muhammad allows for that.
“My faith teaches compassion, and they’ve distorted our faith, we’ve gotta take them on. But more importantly, as a community, we’ve still not done enough. When we’ve got young people who are so disconnected from our society that the moment we talk about what’s happening in Libya, in Syria, in regards to our foreign policy, we get accused of being apologists for terrorism. Let’s have an honest and open debate about these issues, and above all, let’s not let people divide us.”
Shafiq says: “We’ve gotta take them on, but more importantly” — and shifts into a critique of British foreign policy. The subtext here is that the jihad attack was the fault of British actions in Libya, Afghanistan, and Iraq. If only the U.K. would adopt a foreign policy that was to the liking of the global umma, then there wouldn’t be jihad attacks such as the one in Manchester. If the British government stops fighting against jihadis, then the jihadis will stop fighting them. This view sounds reasonable and has many advocates inside Britain, but it ignores the fact that the jihad imperative to “fight until religion is all for Allah” (Qur’an 8:39) remains even against compliant infidels. It also ignores the fact that Britain only got involved in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq because of jihad attacks that predated those interventions and thus cannot reasonably be blamed on them.
Murnaghan then asks Shafiq if Muslims feel oppressed in some way, and so get the idea that they have to fight back, even in extreme form? Shafiq agrees, and continues to blame jihad terror upon British foreign policy:
“Yeah, so you look at what happened in Libya, we went in, we bombed Libya, and then we left, and ISIS was on the rise in Libya. The same in Afghanistan, the same in Iraq. So I’m arguing that because of our military adventures in these countries, we have allowed the terrorist narrative to take hold, we’ve allowed people to be brainwashed, and then we have what we saw here on Monday. There’s no justification –“
When Murnaghan asks Shafiq what he says to Muslims who want to go to Syria to join the jihad, Shafiq ends up blaming Sky News itself:
“Well, first of all, I think we’ve gotta take on the narrative. So they’ve got in their mindset this ideology which says you can use violence to make political points, and Islam sanctions that. And we’ve gotta use the edicts that we’ve seen from scholars like Tahir ul-Qadri or Sheikh Hamza Yusef, American, they’ve produced real strong evidence from the Qur’an and the sayings of the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, why terrorism is wrong. And that’s what we’ve got to promote, do that, and grass roots, and actually give young people a voice and give them a platform. Cause Dermot, no disrespect to you and Sky News, on these panels, how often do we actually give young people a chance to speak up, and talk about their issues?”
“Edicts that we’ve seen from scholars like Tahir ul-Qadri or Sheikh Hamza Yusuf, American, they’ve produced real strong evidence from the Qur’an and the sayings of the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, why terrorism is wrong.” Murnaghan doesn’t ask him at that point to explain what he means by “terrorism,” and that’s a shame, since all too often in such contexts sly Muslim spokesmen are referring to the supposedly “terrorist” actions of the U.K., the U.S., and Israel, and not to the actions of Islamic jihadists.
Murnaghan should have asked him to clarify that point especially since the reformers Shafiq mentions are anything but. Tahir ul-Qadri issued a massive fatwa against terrorism that is really just a gigantic exercise in deception: it never even mentions, much less explains away, the Qur’an passages that jihadis use to justify violence and terrorism. Moreover, Tahir ul-Qadri himself is the framer of Pakistan’s blasphemy law that has been used to persecute countless Christians and other non-Muslims. Some reformer! Hamza Yusuf is no better: he ridicules the idea of Islamic moderation and said that the victims of the Charlie Hebdo jihad massacre “knew what they were doing” — i.e., they had it coming once they blasphemed Muhammad.
That Shafiq is also taken for a moderate and given such a platform on Sky News and elsewhere is evidence of confused and complacent, if not complicit, the media elites in the U.K. and all over the West really are.
Benedict says
Moral: If you cuddle the gator he won’t turn traitor.
james.mich says
Islamoscum decency at its finest. If Shaftthekuffar is a “moderate”, then Khomenei was a Zionist.
David Greenwood says
If you are the only person out of ten people who feed the gator he might eat you last , but he will eventually eat you
colin says
These scum will continue to thrive until the muslim communities weed out the radical preachers and other extremists from their ranks. They know who they are.
martin says
The ‘muslim communities’ know and agree that they are practicising the real islam.
Colin every single so called moderate muslim i have talked with in 17 years all showed me they were lying to disguise islams teachings and agenda.
Muslims do this SO THEY CAN BUILD UP IN NUMBERS THEN SLAUGHTER US.
There is no such thing as a moderate muslim!
Don Foss says
He says “Change the narrative.” Here’s a good beginning: Tear out over 20% of the Qur’an and over 30% of Hadiths, and then do a massive reformation of your laws. That’s a start.
John F says
Only the ignorant and majority of Government officials would believe this Muslim orator.
PRCS says
You can see him in several “Big Question” videos.
An arrogant, lying slimeball.
Godwin says
The UK govt. sees this massacre as storm in tea cup, as long as it getting oil interests n donations from the OIC n selling deadly military hard wares to It. UK elites don’t mind sacrificing a numbers Its citizens for the sake of making lots of money is of vital important.
ElderlyZionist says
“… the “far-right” in Britain hasn’t killed anyone…”
Point of fact. A right-wing extremist, admittedly a loon, murdered MP Jo Cox last year. It’s a notorious case in the UK. There’s a lot of street violence in the UK, robberies and assaults, actually more than in the US, although British thugs don’t have the number of firearms that we have in the US. Some of the assaults and murders are racially or culturally motivated. The Manchester bomber, Salman Abedi, believed that a close friend of his had been murdered, run over by a car and knifed, in a hate crime.
At this time these is no campaign by right-wingers to mass-murder British subjects, no right-wing international movement promoting and financing bombings or suicide attacks. Muslim terror is by far the greater threat. But it’s a mistake to spin the facts too hard, and dismiss the neo-Nazis completely. Too many people know better.
Charli Main says
The Neo -Nazis may not have, so far as an organised group, launched mass murdering attacks on immigrants but they never fail to use the behaviour and activites of Britain’s Muslims to promote their anti- immigration agender and to demonise ” brown people” in general.
Matthew Roberts says
It makes perfect sense to promote an anti immigrant agenda when that particular immigrant group engage in sexual exploitation and rape of young girls, Terrorism, FGM, Honour Killings and generally hold views that are considered loathsome by most decent people. As for Brown people playing the victim no longer works. We have woken up to your games.
Charli Main says
“when that particular immigrant group engage in sexual exploitation and rape of young girls, Terrorism, FGM, Honour Killings and generally hold views that are considered loathsome by most decent people”
Yes, one particular immigrant group. NOT IMMIGRANTS IN GENERAL.
Your kind blames all immigrants for the activities of Muslim immigrants. Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Chinese, Indians ET AL are not raping young white girls, engaging in terrorism, honour killing and hold views that are loathsome to decent people.
Your kind ( nazis) are NOT anti-Jihadists You have just jumped on the anti-Jihadist bandwagon.
This site is called Jihad Watch, “Hitler’s Anus” or “Nazi Wankers ARE US”
tests says
“right-wing”?
ElderlyZionist says
Are you questioning whether Thomas Mair was a right-wing nut job? That was my understanding. He gave his own name in court as “death to traitors, freedom for Britain”. Do you have different information? I’m always learning things.
tests says
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/17/labour-mp-criticised-for-politicising-the-murder-of-jo-cox/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/16/jo-cox-mp-everything-we-know-so-far-about-thomas-mair/
>I don’t think he belonged to any political party and I never heard him express any views about Europe or anything like that.
He wasn’t politically affiliated or was even known to talk politics.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/17/jo-cox-murder-thomas-mair-asked-for-mental-health-treatment-day/
according to the same Telegraph, he had mental problems and asked for treatment the day before the attack happened.
And his problems weren’t recent
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Oakwell+Hall+thriving+with+help+of+volunteers.-a0227735906
>Thomas Mair, 46, started volunteering at the park after learning about the opportunity through the Mirfield-based Pathways Day Centre for adults with mental health problems.
He said: “I can honestly say it has done me more good than all the psychotherapy and medication in the world.
gravenimage says
True, ElderlyZionist.
Cicero says
I have great respect for Jewish people. I admire their valuing knowledge, their resilience, their lovely sense of humour and most of all their humanity.
Unfortunately too many assimilated Jewish people are aiding and abetting the relentless encroachment of the dreaded Islam in the UK and perhaps throughout the world wherever they reside. Too many are confusing anxieties and critique about Islam with Neo – Nazi views. Of course there will be those who are of Neo Nazi inclination who are trying to hijack the counter narrative to Islam. However we must be acutely discerning to differentiate between the two and not conflate both positions. To do so is to benefit Islam.
As regards the British fellow who fatally attacked MP Cox, I understand that there was a back story to this event. The attacker was being evicted from theCouncil house he had occupied from birth with his mother. She died and he asked to continue to live there. The Council refused. They needed the council house to accommodate a large family ( which community is having large families in this age of austerity and recession?) He sought the help of his local MP Cox. She was unhelpful . She had a very strong record of arguing for the rights of minority communities and immigrant groups. The accused may have read right wing material or looked at right wing websites. It does not a right wing plot make!
ElderlyZionist says
I appreciate the response from you and tests, and I take your points. By the way, I don’t think that I, personally, am abetting Islamization, I am doing my best to resist it.
To some degree, though, I think you are both doing the same thing that Muslims do when they claim that a terrorist ‘wasn’t a Muslim’. Mairs *thought* he was a nativist warrior. Yes, he was crazy and had other motivations, but that’s how he thought of himself.
That being so, it is factually incorrect to write, “… the “far-right” in Britain hasn’t killed anyone…”. Let’s stick to the facts – they’re alarming enough.
Cicero says
If Mair thought he was a ” nativist warrior” he acted upon his thinking . In fact there are a significant number of indigenous British citizens who have the same sentiments but they cannot express their sense of their sadness at the. Eroding away of their identity and pride in that “Britishness”. There is no legitimate forum to express those views without being shouted down and hounded out – of ones place of work, one school , one.s university , one’s neighbourhood. Our view is not validated or respected .
When there is no safety valve the situation will become explosive. That way lies civil war ! I am not white Anglo Saxon by the way
Don Foss says
Are the Right-wingers using God and Jesus for justification for their violence? Are they being inspired by Christian (or Hindu or Sikh or Buddhists or Jewish) scripture?
eur says
Attack against Christian koptos in Egypt … for now 23 killed. Nothing to do with Islam.
Jaladhi says
When have Muslims admitted the truth about Islam?? Never! Md. Shafiq is also from the same mold and no body should expect anything from him but blaming others for their murderous ways. Mohammad devised this victim mantra for Muslims from day one. Even when they were murdering and raping Meccans they called themselves the victims of Meccans. The same has gone on for last 1400 years and it has served them well and more so in the present days when the West has also adopted the Muslim lies and are always blaming themselves and their citizens rather than the real culprits – Muslims!
Don Foss says
It seems that way, but in truth there are tens of millions of “Muslims” who have apostatized in their hearts but are helpless in their own societies and cultures to speak out openly – come out of the closet, so to speak – lest they lose family, careers, freedom or even their lives. Women especially. But I can tell you as one whose lived surrounded by Muslims in Islamic culture and having had hundreds of cowrokers and many friends, once you have befriended them and they trust you, you will hear them speak for themselves and speak for many others they know…and feel relief in getting things off their chest, and I’ve even seen a few break down in tears. They are Muslim in name only, hate the religion they are forced to be a part of, and simply go through the most minimal motions to keep up the appearance for their own safety and livelihoods.
underbed cat says
Disgusting. Moderate muslims….act as propaganda machines…islam is islam this is what they do to protect their power as victims passing terror as religion.
Richard Paulsen says
Mainly men behind terror, rapes, vilolent mosques. If only females arriving being granted asylum, there would not be any terror, arsons, rapes and other violence and criminality as is the case now regarding islam and muslims.
Jayell says
Oh dear, Richard, you clearly haven’t been reading your newpapers recently!
Jaladhi says
Muslimas also wage jihad in many ways – there have been several suicide bombers among them as you know. They are not less pious and less deadlier than their male counter parts!
gravenimage says
Richard, I’m afraid that many Muslimahs are just as committed to the savagery of Islam as are their male counterparts.
Don Foss says
They often support their men, encourage zakat and other monies to go to terror organizations, form groups of other women who influence the male members of their families, etc. Also, those who have shamed their families in some cultures, like the Palestinians, will give the women an “out” through martyrdom.
underbed cat says
We see it, (the deception) the democrats bought it…
The left and dems, a few conservatives, worry about Russian influence, but the don’t see this…..I think this is a distraction away from all oil money ( which they detest) buying influence, land. building mosques, donating to political charities, universities, hospitals, pharma…medical research….food science, media etc… to be used by the religion of peace.
A k gurtoo says
Wow…Typical Muslim, and their Islamic logic. Always victims….
Tangata says
Mohammad shadow only dates to spout his BS because the bloody British government and people allows him to spout that BS… If they hammered him for his BS, he’d stop spouting it.
Oliver says
I agree with the above post. And the statement it is the fault of the British government
The government let these pieces of crap in.
Ginger says
He’s absolutely right that the government and preceding governments are to blame, but not for the reasons he gives. Every single European government has blood on its hands, yet they are still voted in. It’s inexplicable.
Santa Voorhees says
I think Shafiq is right about blaming the UK government. After all, it is the UK government who let the bomber enter the country.
overman says
Jeremy Corbyn imitates this muslim apologist today – obviously fishing for muslim votes.
Jeremy Corbyn blames terrorist attacks such as Manchester bombing on UK foreign policy
Intelligence experts have linked ‘wars our government has supported or fought in other countries and terrorism here at home’, Labour leader claims
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-manchester-attack-terrorism-uk-foreign-policy-wars-speech-a7756266.html
martin says
Jeremey CONbin, his labour party brought them in for their votes and they had to keep pleasing the muslims to keep their votes, which included hiding up rotherhams muslims taking their right hand possessions, – sex slaves.
Labour has not been labour for many years, but now under conbin, the jew hating marxist, islamonazi party is the muslims ‘wet dream’.
Communists have often sided with muslims as their common enemy is democracy.
Conbin however might think they are his friends but in reality they despise him as a traitor and will still slit. his throat and remove his head.
Jayell says
The bit about taxi drivers taking victims/relatives miles for no payment is a joke in its presentation. It DID happen, I believe, but it was promoted as though it involved largely – if not exclusively? – muslim taxi drivers. We know that there are a lot of muslim cab drivers in northern towns, but the non-English drivers who were offering this service were (according to a report) predominantly Sikh of Hindu. I believe that the correct information about all this became somewhat distorted by some of the media and certain individuals ‘with an interest’. Going on the reports of the role of certain taxi drivers in the Rotherham debacle, I’m afraid that the thought of any daughter of mine being offered a ‘humanitarian gesture’ by a muslim taxi driver would be the very LAST thing I would ever want.
gravenimage says
Good point, Jayell.
martin says
I found myself hoping they were not muslim taxi drivers as here in the uk their is an epedemic of muslim taxi drivers, molesting and raping woman, and at least one man also being raped.
c matt says
blames the Manchester attack on the British government’s foreign policy
If he is referring to their foreign policy of welcoming Muslim refugees into Britain, he is “spot on” as the Brits would say.
Halal Bacon says
translation? the UK is not submitting fast enough
Keys says
“…My faith teaches compassion, and they’ve distorted our faith, we’ve gotta take them on…”
Bullshit, you muslim liar! Take them on, if your faith is so compassionate, by setting up a muslim fund to assist the families who lost loved ones and survivors. Think you’d even get a few thousand pounds of muslm donations?
Bernice says
Access the following link about an Australian named Imam Shaikh Mohammad Tawhidi. He is always under fire in the Australian news because he condemns all of what the Islamic terrorists perpetrate, rejects their ideology, and more importantly, he condemns sharia law and doesn’t want it implemented there.
http://dailym.ai/2qkmlyn
Xero_G says
I’d love to see an international poll, taken by a major reputable polling organisation (such as Pew, Gallup, etc.) asking citizens one question; “Can you explain the meaning of the Islamic term, TAQIYYA?
Does anyone think the number of correct responses would be more than 1%?
martin says
I was thinking of asking people on the streets if they could name at least one of the warfare lying ‘styles’ that ALL MUSLIMS use,… it might be in inroad for some facts…..
Jack Holan says
My rump Mohamed! Maybe your own swallow this type of out of the world explanations, we don’t. We have nothing to feel guilty about, either. You’ve decided to make war on us long before we ever reacted. I’m not referring to the 21st or 20th century. This is the written history of record. It wasn’t fantasizes yesterday. If you find our society oppressive you should try out a Muslim country for a period of time.
gravenimage says
Muslim spokesman Mohammed Shafiq blames UK government for Manchester jihad massacre
……………………………
More of the usual–the “filthy Infidels” have brought violent Jihad on themselves.
More:
These children were collateral damage of the raid, just as they today might be collateral damage of a jihad bombing such as the one we saw in Manchester Monday night— and Muhammad allows for that.
……………………………
With the greatest respect to Robert Spencer, I do not entirely agree with this assessment.
Ariana Grande is *known* for having many teenage and tween fans. The kids who died in the Manchester Jihad bombing were not collateral damage–they were the targets.
martin says
I found myself hoping they were not muslim taxi drivers as here in the uk their is an epedemic of muslim taxi drivers, molesting and raping woman, and at least one man also being raped.
overman says
For those who don’t realize what Ariana Grande [the singer at the manchester concert] is really like – She is Pro-Muslim, Pro-Refugee and Anti-Trump [as many of these Hollywood Liberals are. l used to like Kirsten Dunst acting, until l learn’t that after the American election, she woke up next morning and burst into tears because Clinton had lost – WTH is wrong with these ppl. They need to grow up].
Below is what Grande said about her fans in 2014 –
“An industry insider told the New York Daily News: ‘She did autographs and pics and was all smiles until she got into the elevator.
‘And as soon as the doors shut she said, “I hope they all f***ing die.”‘
Jack Holan says
Frankly I heed no attention to celebrity or ppl without the first clue of what is truly going on. What does scare me are ppl such s Admiral Kirk CIA Director Brennan Klapper the Liar, Homeland Security Chief Jeh Johnson’s closeness to the Muslim Brotherhood and now we slew of new faces with similar messenges that weaken our resolve
rosemary hopkin says
YES MOHAMMED SHAFIQ IT ISIS THE BRITISH GOVERNMENTS FAULT FOR THE KILLINGS OF THESE CHILDREN. THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT ALLOW SHIT LIKE YOU PEOPLE TO HAVE ANY OPPORTUNITY TO KILL . JUST TRY AND LIVE NORMALLY WITHOUT TRYING TO MAKE EVERYBODY ELSE IN THE COUNTRIES YOU EMIGRATE TO LIKE YOURSELVES. I MYSELF HAVE NO INTENTION OF RUNNING AROUND IN A BLACK BIN LINER. EVER. You are still on a quest from centuries ago..
dumbledoresarmy says
There is – as others have pointed out – *one* sense in which he is correct. The UK government *does* carry some responsibility.
The UK Government (not the current Parliament, but a previous administration – indeed, some time previous) in an act of abysmal folly permitted the Manchester Muslim human bomb’s *parents* to enter and colonise the UK, where they produced a bunch of children whom they proceeded to pickle in Islam.
Had our Islamikaze’s parents NEVER been permitted to enter the UK in the first place; if, upon their reciting their piteous sob story about being persecuted victims of Gaddafi, they had been implacablly told that there were 56 *other* OIC countries within which they ought to seek asylum, and kindly b*gger off to one of *those* if they really needed asylum; THEN 22 people would be alive, who now are dead, and over 100 people would not have been wounded, many of them crippled for life.
I wonder how that Mohammedan would have reacted, if someone had calmly and coldly stated precisely that: “The UK government *are* at fault; they let the jihadi’s parents into the country. If they hadn’t let them in, he wouldn’t have been born in the UK and able to carry out his mass-murder.”
That is the point that can and should be made, by British jihadwatchers, posting or lurking, to their MPs, and the PM, and everybody else in Parliament. “Got Muslims? Got Jihad”. “If the Jihad bomber’s parents hadn’t been let into the UK all those people in Manchester would not be dead”.
Say it as simply as that.
And keep saying it, every opportunity you get. Because it’s the truth.
Cicero says
Alas ” booting……out of our midst” in the UK is no longer an option. The Religion of Peace followers are deeply embedded in British society …. throughout the lands. They loudly proclaim their Britishness whilst living Koranic and Shariah law to letter.
The very publicised scandal of the so called Unaccompanied Minors scheme whereby grown Muslim men pose as children to illegally enter the UK continues unabated. It is very obvious that these Minors are men and that the tales they tell the UK authorities are manifestly false . However UK Borders Agency has neither the will nor the resources to deport them.
Additionally the home grown Followers of the Religion of Peace through the benefits of free health care, free education, positive action and the safety and security provided by the Indigenous British Christians have thrived and are multiplying through their excessive birth rate. It is now becoming manifest through ALL layers of British society .
My estate agent is a Muslim. My dentist is a Muslim. My GP is a Muslim. My optician is a Muslim in a hijab.. My corner shop/ news agent is a Muslim. My green grocer is a Muslim. My bus and train drivers are Muslim. My mayor is a Muslim. My neighbour is a Muslim. My street which used to be a lovely leafy lane in the inner city with neighbours English, Irish, Jewish and Caribbean neighbours now has a heaving bursting madrasah at one end and increasing hijabbed , niqabbed, bearded residents at the other end. The Coubcillor representative is politically right on but dismissive of any concerns expressed about the increasing Islamisation of our once lovely neighbourhood
I do not see the British elite giving any clear leadership and confronting the threat to British culture and British values robustly. People on the street are very very angry but afraid to give vent to their fury.
Valkyrie Ziege says
; Blaming the victim is the typical cowardly act of a malignant narcissist. Muhammadanism is the same as the crappy boy-friend that beats-up, and sexually abuses, his girl-friend, and the next day when he brings her roses, he is greeted by the police,the promise of a restraining order, the girl-friend breaks-up with him, and he has the nerve to cry that he is emotionally hurt, and no one understands him.
Laura Young says
From 10News:
http://www.10news.one/the-real-cause-for-islamic-terrorism/
Red says
Slimy little man. Thinks like a Pakistani
mortimer says
Mohammed Shafiq sez … MUSLIMS ARE NEVER TO BLAME FOR ANYTHING … the DIRTY KUFAAR are to be blamed because they deny that Mohammed is a valid prophet.
It’s obvious, isn’t it? (sarc/off)
No, it’s only obvious to a brainwashed zombie who hates KUFAAR ‘for the sake of Allah’.
Hey, Shafiq, what is the ‘correct amount’ of hate that will please Allah? How much do YOU hate the dirty kufaar ‘for the sake of Allah’ ???
steve brown says
If this was 1942 – America’s military would be attacking ; Germany- The UK- France- Sweden-Austria- Iran- Syria- Somalia- Indonesia. Buts it’s 2017 and Jesus help us from ourselves.
Cretius says
Typical. Islamists blame the victim for the outrage carried out by Muslims.