• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

New York City subway posters affirm right of Muslim women to wear hijab

May 29, 2017 7:35 pm By Robert Spencer

New York City’s virtue is now amply signaled, and it is interesting that the City authorities decided to mount this campaign in the subways, where a Muslima named Yasmin Seweid falsely claimed that she had been brutalized by Trump supporters for wearing hijabs. Actual incidents of harassment of hijab-wearing women are harder to come by.

Also, where is New York City’s concern for Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it? Or Aqsa and Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab? Or the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; or Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; or Amira Osman Hamid, who faced whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; or the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; or the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; or the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; or the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; or the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; or the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; or the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; or the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; or the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents; or the fifteen girls in Saudi Arabia who were killed when the religious police wouldn’t let them leave their burning school building because they had taken off their hijabs in their all-female environment; or all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab?

Who is standing in solidarity with them? Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence. At the same time, the women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who speaks for them? Mayor de Blasio?

(Thanks to Julia for the photo.)

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: "Islamophobia", claiming victim status, Featured, New York City, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Bill de Blasio, Yasmin Seweid


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. somehistory says

    May 29, 2017 at 8:11 pm

    They may not be able to harm another with their scarves…unless they take it off and try to strangle another, but what happens when they want to carry sharp knives, swords, guns, etc. and brandish them at anyone else on the car? Will the public be allowed…to have the *right* to feel threatened?

    The ugly scarves are a threat…one of the first to show the rest of mankind that islum is going to take over and force worship of the beast.

    • somehistory says

      May 29, 2017 at 8:14 pm

      The take-over is intended…but they will fail to force everyone.

      (Revelation 16)

    • Carolyne says

      May 30, 2017 at 11:21 am

      But…but…..If women leave their hair exposed, all Muslim men will go into a sexual frenzy and who knows where that will lead?

  2. gravenimage says

    May 29, 2017 at 8:30 pm

    New York City subway posters affirm right of Muslim women to wear hijab
    ……………………………..

    Is there any right *not* to wear the Hijab without risking being beaten to death? Of course not–that would be “Islamophobic”…

    And how does anyone have the right not to be considered a threat?

    Anyone who wears the slave rag is extravagantly showing their commitment to Islam, a creed that enjoins its followers to rape and slaughter us until we submit.

    How is that *not* a threat?

    • Kay says

      May 29, 2017 at 8:47 pm

      Good post.

      Ridiculous subway poster.

      • gravenimage says

        May 29, 2017 at 8:56 pm

        Thank you, Kay.

        That this is the New York Commission on Human Rights if especially perverse.

        That these posters are plastered on subway trains–a frequent target of pious Muslim Jihadists–is extra sickening.

      • WPM says

        May 29, 2017 at 11:57 pm

        It was about 6 years ago Pamela Geller had subway posters showing some hateful passages from the Koran and Hadith. I think the some Islam group sued and won to take them down. Our freedom of speech is slowly eroding under the twin pressure of progressives and Islamics. The truth always get in the way of Islamic mission in the West of full Sharia law ,progressives will make it unlawful to even talk about Islamics in any negative way.

        • gravenimage says

          May 31, 2017 at 3:53 pm

          True, WPM.

      • Anne Smith says

        May 30, 2017 at 8:20 am

        Sour looking puss.

    • Linnte says

      May 30, 2017 at 3:47 am

      My thoughts too!

    • Donovan Nuera says

      May 30, 2017 at 7:58 pm

      Time for the production of that nice counter-poster idea of not being beaten up or raped if NOT wearing wearing a hijab/niqab/burka. Just bribe the local maintenance guy a couple of $20s to open up the frame and place the new poster over the old one. Wink wink….

    • maghan says

      May 30, 2017 at 8:16 pm

      Should someone have the right to wear a Nazi uniform without being harassed? The Muslim hijab is not like any piece of harmless clothing like a nun’s habit.

      The Muslim hijab signifies that one is a member of a religion that is based on the teachings and writings in the Islamic trilogy: Qur’an, Sirah, and Hadith. That religion is Islam–which divides the world into believers and the discriminatory term “infidels”.

      The Qur’an prescribes that Muslims must engage in jihad and kill infidels, rape them, and forcefully force them to convert.

      The Qur’an–the unalterable words of Allah–states that Allah has made females inferior to males and that they must submit to them when necessary. The Qur’an also states that husbands have the Allah-given right to beat women when they misbehave and to chastise them for challenging the authority of men. The Qur’an also gives the right of males to rape infidel females when they are captured in raids.

      So why would any rational and normal female wish to be a Muslim and to broadcast it for all to see. What utter stupidity and self-hate.

  3. Guest says

    May 29, 2017 at 8:31 pm

    OT, Germany, Dresden: the video of the latest Pegida meeting, 29 May, has been removed from youtube for ‘hate speech’. Perhaps some speakers were a wee bit angry about Manchester?

    So Germany, helped by youtube and facebook, is smacking down hard on criticism of islam.

  4. Jason says

    May 29, 2017 at 8:39 pm

    If you read the poster carefully, you will notice that it is not so much about the right to wear a hijab, but about whether you should be allowed to criticize it.

    This is a speech control campaign.

    • somehistory says

      May 29, 2017 at 8:55 pm

      They want it to be against the law, a crime written on the books, to not like it. To feel anything other than what they want us to feel about it.

      hillary clinton said she could *shame* us into compliance. For those who resist feeling shame about hating islam, more drastic measures are planned.

      • Westman says

        May 29, 2017 at 10:36 pm

        Hillary shaming us? She “deplorabled” herself right out of the White House.

        A stellar education and international influence is not a sufficiently opaque facade for an angry supremist intolerance.

      • no_one says

        May 29, 2017 at 10:51 pm

        That stinking hag wouldn’t be able to do it to me. I come from people that have resisted the thugs for 5 centuries and I am not going to shame them.

    • gravenimage says

      May 29, 2017 at 8:57 pm

      Important observation, Jason–that is *exactly* what this is.

    • VRWC member77 says

      May 29, 2017 at 9:06 pm

      Jason,

      ***** Exactly *******

      Hey DeBlasio and the author of this Islamic Supremacist poster,

      I have the Right to call you a threat and I’M CALLING YOU A THREAT RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW ON THIS SITE. Your hijab is a symbol of a Vile Supremacist Cult and I despise anyone who actively promotes it. Come and challenge me !

      • JawsV says

        May 29, 2017 at 10:39 pm

        de Blasio’s real name is Warren Wilhelm Jr. Guess he thought Wilhelm wouldn’t go over. De Blasio is his mother’s maiden name. I can’t stand him.

      • Carolyne says

        May 30, 2017 at 11:27 am

        I agree. Anyone has the right to wear whatever they want as a headdress, even a potato sack–oh, wait—they already do, and I have the right to ridicule them for such silly behavior.

    • Jude says

      May 30, 2017 at 2:53 am

      … and as such it is a government funded attack on free speech. Isn’t that against the law?

  5. Warmac9999 says

    May 29, 2017 at 9:00 pm

    Islam is a violent totalitarian theopolitical ideology. It cannot change.

  6. gravenimage says

    May 29, 2017 at 9:05 pm

    Notice the scowl on her face. They didn’t even pretend that Muslims in Hijab are anything but hostile.

    • JawsV says

      May 29, 2017 at 10:41 pm

      I used to feel sorry for Muslimas back in the ’90’s but that’s long vanished.

    • Shmooviyet says

      May 29, 2017 at 11:27 pm

      Yes— why no big, warm smile?
      Looks like defiant Cultural Pride, mixed with a little “whatcha gonna do?” attitude.

    • dumbledoresarmy says

      May 30, 2017 at 6:17 am

      Yes.

      The expression on that face is insufferably arrogant.

      It’s frightening.

      It’s a very, very, very threatening poster.

      It says “I am the Queen of the World. Bow down to me, kuffar slaves!!”

      • JawsV says

        May 30, 2017 at 7:49 am

        She looks like “Big Brother.” We’ll all have her staring down at us in our homes.

      • maghan says

        May 30, 2017 at 8:21 pm

        Yet hijab wearers are like slaves proudly showing off their brandings or like prisoners parading with their striped prison clothing in public. Sheer stupidity and self contempt.

  7. StacyGirl says

    May 29, 2017 at 9:27 pm

    Where does their faith call for wearing the slave rag? Who is denying them the right to do so?

  8. Gary says

    May 29, 2017 at 9:43 pm

    ….and I should have the right to support and defend the constitution of The United States of America over Sharia Law.

    Intolerance, hate speech, bigoted racist comments…….

    Funny how Muslims overlook the living conditions in Turkey, Iran, and Afghanistan to “Claim” they’re being targeted by non-muslims here in America.

    Islam: The number one violator of human rights on the face of the earth.

  9. Richard says

    May 29, 2017 at 10:01 pm

    Publish this poster, right below the CAIR one:

    Why were we murdered for not wearing the Hijab?
    Don’t we have the right not to wear the Hijab?
    You do have the right! As do MILLIONS of our sisters in Muslim countries that are denied this right! Fight for us, fight for our sisters!
    http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/06/19/17/29C937B800000578-3131595-image-a-4_1434731069074.jpg

  10. Papa Whiskey says

    May 29, 2017 at 10:17 pm

    BIG SISTER IS WATCHING YOU.

    • Kay says

      May 30, 2017 at 12:00 am

      Yeah, I think it’s partly to get us all used to seeing them all the time. I see them just about every day already, but not constantly.

      By the way, “modest” used to have within its meaning “not calling attention to oneself.” But the wearing of hijab here seems designed as a call for attention.

      • Papa Whiskey says

        May 30, 2017 at 12:17 am

        Yes — very much like the swastika armband worn in 1930s Germany. And the hijab elicits the same reaction in me as the latter would, and for the same reason.

        • dumbledoresarmy says

          May 30, 2017 at 6:17 am

          YES.

          That is *exactly* how it affects me.

          It’s Gang Uniform. And it is an open *threat* to ALL who don’t belong to the Gang.

        • Vlad says

          May 30, 2017 at 7:57 pm

          Yes during the WWW-2 wearing the armband displaying the swastika was certainly to show that the person wearing it is a Nazi.
          Today overwhelming migrants being dressed in hijabs,burkas etc.present them selfs as a hard core Muslims.They are bringing their bible of QUR’AN which they apparently want to hang on. and practise their feith.Unfortunately as I’ve found, their bible is overwhelmingly full of violence and it appears everything what goes against Mohamed’s
          teaching must be resolved by mersiless elimination of the infidels

          Well there is enough of those Muslims today who tell as that they are the “milder”breed of their flock and that they disagree with some of the verses QUR’AN tells them to do in order to please Allah.

          Unfortunately this is where I have a problem to buy that.To me a person who wears a burka,nijab or some kind of rag on his head is clearly demonstrating that he is a worshiping Muslim and now I have to wonder how much fanatic he is in this business. I guess I might to compare it to a situation where I have to deal with a Nazi who tells me that he disagree with all of those cruelties committed in Auschwitz for an example. At the same time he is displaying that swastika armband on his sleeve. I presume that that when he would say “I am a moderate Nazi ” there would be not too many people to buy that. As Mr. Nathan Yahoo said sometime ago “If its quack: like a duck, walks like a duck and looks like a duck its a duck. I guess we can ask” Are you a Muslim who appreciate teachings of Qua’ran with all of the contents like Sharia Law ? Than get out of our country, you do not fit here any way. If you think that you can somehow moderate that book of evil forget about that, you will never make it.Throw the book of eavel in the garbage your headdress included and become one of our citizens who wants to adapt him self and does not want to conker or recreate the west.

          I am well aware that here in the WEST we have something in our constitutions in regards of rights of persons religion, There are some rumors that there are still places on this planet where a human scarification is still secretly performed, we certainly could not allow that.The constitution also forbids that someone would force his personal values[I understand theological as well] on to an somebody.

          Here I’d like to ask,why there are already signs that we are always expected to respect the requests and wishes of Muslims whose QUA’RAN is entirely against our constitution, culture and the criminal code? What is a average citizen expected to think about our top politicians, are they so ignorant or just plain traitors who are ready to sell their country anytime? It sounds that the whole world vent mad

      • maghan says

        May 30, 2017 at 8:24 pm

        The Qur’an/Hadith states that mature females should be covered up and kept indoors–or men will harass them sexually.

  11. JawsV says

    May 29, 2017 at 10:43 pm

    Only 16 years after 9/11 and this is what we’re reduced to. Whoever thought the West would be surrendering to Islam in the 21st century? No one.

    • gravenimage says

      May 29, 2017 at 11:39 pm

      I know how you feel, Jaws. What suicidal madness.

      • maghan says

        May 30, 2017 at 8:28 pm

        All because Standard Oil discovered oil in the sand wastes where primitive Arabs lived. The result” in the 20th century, the West has become a slave to Arab oil and by implication, a slave to primitive Islam.

        • gravenimage says

          May 30, 2017 at 10:37 pm

          I think it has more to do with “political correctness” and willful ignorance.

          The average person is not committed to defending Islam oil; and at this point, oil reserves in the civilized world are proving more impressive all the time.

        • gravenimage says

          May 30, 2017 at 10:58 pm

          That should have been “Muslim oil”.

    • Debi Brand says

      May 30, 2017 at 3:10 am

      “Only 16 years after 9/11 and this is what we’re reduced to. Whoever thought the West would be surrendering to Islam in the 21st century? No one.”

      Yup. In a word.

      • JawsV says

        May 30, 2017 at 7:53 am

        9/11 was the best thing to have happened to Muslims. Instead of crushing Islam we kowtowed.

        • Debi Brand says

          May 30, 2017 at 2:37 pm

          Indeed J. V.

          It has spotlighted are willingness to aid in making “Allah’s Word” true, thus, exposed of fool-headed willingness to honor, praise, protect and promote the doctrine followed to the letter in the 9/11 attacks.

          The doctrine adhered to and followed in every instance in which a “believer” in his obedience to “Allah,” dismembered, maimed, or killed a U.S. Soldier, Sailor, Airmen, or Marine.

          If such is not foolishness of loathsome degree, if not much worse, what, pray tell me, would be?

        • gravenimage says

          May 30, 2017 at 11:01 pm

          Grimly true, Jaws and Debi. What should have been a call to action became the beginning of surrender to Islam for too many dhimmis.

  12. SK says

    May 29, 2017 at 10:49 pm

    Are they talking about people shouting loudly at hijabis on the subway and disrupting service?

    If not, hmm.

  13. mortimer says

    May 29, 2017 at 10:51 pm

    Only a few years after women won equal rights in North America, useful idiots are demanding that North America submit to a backward 7th-century, misogynistic RAPE CULT.

    This is so despicable and insane a betrayal of women that the insanity and amorality of it defy words.

    The world is having a mental breakdown in the face of Islam.

    This is a mass PSYCHOSIS … this is COLLECTIVE SADOMASOCHISM!

    • JawsV says

      May 29, 2017 at 11:22 pm

      Gives new meaning to “It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.”

      Whoever thought we’d see the West go nuts over Islam? No one.

      • Kay says

        May 30, 2017 at 12:03 am

        Not me. I thought I would be safe from it in my own country, my own city. It’s like living in my nightmare.

        • JawsV says

          May 30, 2017 at 7:55 am

          Prior to 9/11 I didn’t give Islam a thought, including when traveling to Europe in the ’90’s.

    • gravenimage says

      May 30, 2017 at 11:02 pm

      Grimly true, Mortimer.

  14. Georg says

    May 29, 2017 at 10:57 pm

    Whoever paid for that monument to idiocy surely had/has the purest of intentions.

    • gravenimage says

      May 29, 2017 at 11:42 pm

      George, it was paid for by the City of New York, using taxpayer money.

      Notice it says “NYC Commission on Human Rights” at the bottom of the poster.

      • Georg says

        May 30, 2017 at 4:56 am

        Wow… That is hideous. A black headscarf has become emblematic of human rights vis-a-vis nyc government. Orwellian as it’s the place of 9/11. It is honestly chilling.

        • gravenimage says

          May 30, 2017 at 11:05 pm

          It *is* chilling, Georg.

          And sorry for misspelling your name in my last reply.

        • Georg says

          May 31, 2017 at 6:56 am

          No apology necessary. Just happy to be in correspondence w/ someone like yourself!

        • gravenimage says

          May 31, 2017 at 4:53 pm

          Thank you, Georg. I feel the same about you.

  15. Larry A. Singleton says

    May 29, 2017 at 11:19 pm

    Celebrity Hijabs: The World’s Worst Fashion Statement by Uzay Bulut.

    Or a good companion on this regarding the useful idiot celebrities and world “leaders” joining in “solidarity” with their “Muslim sisters”: Hijabs on Western Public Women by Daniel Pipes.

    Ban the Burqa? The Argument in Favor by Phyllis Chesler.

    I Don’t Oppose The Hijab Because I Was Forced; I Oppose The Hijab Because It Sucks by Marwa.

    That Meme Comparing Hijabis to Nuns Need to Die in a Pit of Fire by Hiba.

    • gravenimage says

      May 31, 2017 at 4:53 pm

      Yes, Larry–the idea that these slave rags are “fashionable” is really sick.

  16. SAM says

    May 29, 2017 at 11:49 pm

    This is nothing but disgusting.

  17. King Edward Potato says

    May 30, 2017 at 12:09 am

    It would be nice to see a poster showing someone wearing a cross or a yarmulke with the same message. But we know that’s not going to happen.

  18. Richard says

    May 30, 2017 at 12:14 am

    An obligation can never be a right. An obligation is oppression.

  19. somehistory says

    May 30, 2017 at 12:26 am

    Actual *rights* are given by our Creator. And He can certainly take them away…any one or more of them and at any time He chooses.

    • maghan says

      May 30, 2017 at 8:31 pm

      Natural rights vs. Positive Rights? Many people prefer positive rights–because they can be challenged and changed.

      • somehistory says

        May 30, 2017 at 9:09 pm

        In this country, the government is charged with protecting the *rights* that are given by our Creator.
        “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, …”

        Rights are different from privileges. Such as driving. In my State, the handbook states: “Driving is a privilege, not a right.”

        True Rights cannot be taken away by men, only by God, our Creator. I much prefer True Rights as opposed to the whims of men.

        • maghan says

          May 31, 2017 at 3:06 am

          Empirical evidence must be provided. Do these “creator given rights” also apply to animals? Finally, what exactly are the “creator provided rights”?

        • somehistory says

          May 31, 2017 at 11:20 am

          You just don’t understand what my comments mean. No more *evidence * for what I said is necessary. Evidence for my comment is provided above.
          If you can read, read again. It is clear to any who wish to understand and not be obtuse.
          Hint: if you don’t know the meaning of obtuse, Websters or the Oxford can assist you.

          If you still don’t understand, seek help from someone in your medical or educational community. You may need glasses or reading assistance.

        • somehistory says

          May 31, 2017 at 11:27 am

          BTW ((by the way), just whom are you quoting?
          From your comment:
          “‘creator given rights” “creator provided rights”?'”

          If you are attempting to use my words, read again what is written and don’t quote me incorrectly.

  20. marina says

    May 30, 2017 at 12:31 am

    Sandra Solomon an apostate from Canada has created “burn the hijab day ” on July 1st.

    Let us all burn hijabs on July 1st and stand in solidarity with the oppressed muslimas who dont have the choice not to wear hijabs

  21. Tama says

    May 30, 2017 at 1:32 am

    The thirty day hijab Challenge made it to my Facebook timeline : /
    Open invitation to non muz.

    https://preview.ibb.co/gGAZqv/Screenshot_20170529_120053_01.png

  22. Cthulhu says

    May 30, 2017 at 1:32 am

    What next? I should have the right to kill unbelievers, because my faith calls for it?

    • Debi Brand says

      May 30, 2017 at 2:48 pm

      “What next? I should have the right to kill unbelievers, because my faith calls for it?”

      Well, of course, C-t…that is the tacit statement made in the poster: the Muslims have a right to do all their faith commands them to do. End of story. Long and short of it.

      How do you think Islam became so dominate?

      No nation yet shows the courage and will to make illegal in that nation the right for Muslims to follow the demands of their faith.

      All we do, again and again, is, for the cause of Islam, fan the flames of freedom [aka: freedom according to Islam].

  23. Dajjal says

    May 30, 2017 at 1:50 am

    Why is the symbolic shield of open defecation in the desert needed in civilized cities having private sanitary facilities? Are the Muslimas defecating on the sidewalks, parks and subways?

    • Georg says

      May 30, 2017 at 5:02 am

      If only the answer were “no”.

    • maghan says

      May 30, 2017 at 8:33 pm

      Some say that in Germany they do it swimming pools.

      • gravenimage says

        May 30, 2017 at 11:11 pm

        With any other group, this would be a focus of disgust. With Muslims, this is the least of the threat they present to us.

  24. Debi Brand says

    May 30, 2017 at 3:06 am

    “I should have the right,” asserts the Muslima, “to wear what my faith calls for, without being called a threat.”

    Well of course you should, Muslima.

    Of course you have that right. As do your brothers and sister in your faith, who, perhaps, just like you, will to exercise their religious freedom rights to do all their and your faith calls for.

    We get that, Miss or Ms. Muslima.

    So you all just carry on.

    Do all your faith calls for and demands that you do–make your plans, as your faith commands you to do, train your bodies, as your faith commands you to, so too your minds, and when the moment is right, be your jihad in the way of “Allah” by the pen, the tongue or the sword, execute.

    We as stupid American assure you those rights.

  25. No Fear says

    May 30, 2017 at 3:27 am

    What does the Human Rights Commission say about my “right” to wear my motorcycle helmet into a bank?

    • Georg says

      May 30, 2017 at 5:05 am

      As it would contribute to mayhem within our borders, they’d probably be all about it.

  26. Eur says

    May 30, 2017 at 4:00 am

    The king is naked!!! Although they try to tell us that it is a free choice it is obvious that it is not. When is the hijab-free day celebrated to support women and girls who are forced to wear it?

  27. Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

    May 30, 2017 at 4:25 am

    If x number of women were allegedly killed for not wearing hijabs we should heave a sigh of relief.

    It is their womenfolk that give birth to jihadists. Hence proportionately that many jihadists remain unborn.

    Look at the Blessings in disguise. That many beef eating non vegetarians unborn. All the Animals & Birds plus Fish would feel happy.

    This applies to Beef eating , beef exporting muslims , christians & leftists of India ALSO. My only complaint being they are not dying in India. If America can selectively target & kill those leftists abundantly overpopulating Kerala , West Bengal & Tamil Nadu I a Hindu would be gratified.

    Instead of vain useless talks on climate in Paris , economy in Davos & human rights of muslim terrorists of Kashmir much good can be accomplished by exterminating all anti Hindu scum of Kerala , Tamil Nadu , West Bengal , Delhi , Andhra Pradesh etc. This is the most ideal way of depopulating India which is full of dangerous scum.

    Dangerous leftists of India include prannoy roys , prakash karat his brother in law , sitaram yechury , their entire families, the media owned by them , the abattoirs owned by them , various political outfits called dmk , dk , congress etc .

    India is fettered by british constitution that is not only obsolete but also heavily in favour of such leftist scum , christians & muslims who are all INIMICAL to us Hindus. Hence even a Hindu PM Narendra Modi cannot do much save mourning the death of useless idiot jawaharlal nehru.

    Only a no nonsense Trump can unleash a couple of “mother of all bombs” on Kerala , Tamil Nadu & West Bengal communist political class.

    • gravenimage says

      May 30, 2017 at 11:46 pm

      Are you *really* advocating Muslims killing women? You do realize that they murder Infidel women, including Hindus, don’t you?

      • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

        May 31, 2017 at 12:17 am

        Read what Robert Spencer has written. That certain muslim women were killed by their fellow muslim men for not wearing hijab.

        • gravenimage says

          May 31, 2017 at 5:50 pm

          Of course I read the article. Your implication that Robert Spencer is *lauding* Muslims murdering women for not wearing Hijab is just grotesque.

          Muslims also violently target *non-Muslims* for not wearing Hijabs in “Muslim areas”. Infidels in places like Tower Hamlets have been attacked for not wearing Hijab.

          I’m sure this happens in Muslim-majority parts of India, as well.

          The idea that we should applaud Muslim savagery is *much* mistaken.

      • Janakiraman Rajalakshmi says

        Jun 1, 2017 at 2:02 am

        Nowhere have I “implied” that Robert Spencer is “lauding”. Your presumptions are not my burden.

  28. David says

    May 30, 2017 at 4:38 am

    Muslim propaganda with words for the weak minded!

    • Georg says

      May 30, 2017 at 5:10 am

      “Islamophobia is a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons.”

      -Andrew Cummins

  29. David says

    May 30, 2017 at 4:44 am

    I am going to wear a bikini & hijab and strut down the sidewalks in new yorkcity! And stout I am a transvestite Muslim man!!! Would anyone what to join?

    • Georg says

      May 30, 2017 at 5:11 am

      You would probably get the key to the city.

  30. andra says

    May 30, 2017 at 5:23 am

    Dear Americans, do you really believe that you will be spared the Islamisation of your home Country? You´re rushing into it, even faster than most European countries did, and with eyes wide open.

    • Debi Brand says

      May 30, 2017 at 2:52 pm

      Yup.

      Seen by all with eyes to see.

  31. mummymovie says

    May 30, 2017 at 5:33 am

    Following the visit to the oil pig monarchs of Saudi Arabia, our fearless loser (thrice failing at begging for a travel ban implementation from federal judges) and state secretary have, just in time for the joyous time of murder, maiming, and mayhem our enemies call Ramadan, placed a glorious gift at the feet of our rapidly advancing enemies to advance their cause of destroying western civilization: lifting all restrictions on unvettable MENA migrants, giving them full license to come ravage our children, grandchildren, and theirs. I retract my support for Trump, Sessions, and any party; we must starts our version of Pegida here in America. This is our last chance, I fear. God bless.

    • Carolyne says

      May 30, 2017 at 11:56 am

      I don’t understand how you can blame President Trump for the left-wing judges who have voted against his ban. But if you want to destroy your country, go ahead and try to overthrow Trump and see how you like Schumer and Pelosi in control.

  32. Jon says

    May 30, 2017 at 5:33 am

    Same is happening in Australia and the UK. All of a sudden there are heaps of attacks on Muslimas having their niqabs and headscarves ripped off. There have been a couple of isolated incidents proven but it’s usually at the hands of some drunken yobbos looking for a fight, nothing unusual about that!
    Muslims have been encouraged to report any cases of attacks or harassment and the feeling among the rest of us is that they’re just making the stories up to gain some sympathy. Theirs is a religion founded on fantasy anyway, so lying is not out of the question if some advantage is seen to be gained.

    • mummymovie says

      May 30, 2017 at 5:48 am

      Right? You must hand it to them; they seem to have the methodology down… and are very well organized. Bizarre!

      • rubiconcrest says

        May 30, 2017 at 1:47 pm

        We naively think that we are the first to experience this but we are not. We are witnesses to our very own slow but steady Islamization. Islam has a playbook and we do not.

    • gravenimage says

      May 31, 2017 at 12:13 am

      Jon, a lot of these supposed attacks on women in Hijabs have turned out to be faked.

  33. mummymovie says

    May 30, 2017 at 5:45 am

    How is this all happening? And so quickly? I thought Sessions was our ally. He could have lowered the admissions cap, but instead this! WTF?!? The hijab advertisement campaign is timed for Ram-a-pedestriAn, too. Who’s funding the jihadist propaganda campaign? They seem to have bottomless support.
    Civilization wrecked in a decade and half, and without armies or nukes or anything? Kim Jong Il’s not a threat; he’ll only cramp their style- smoothest takeover in history.

    • Eur says

      May 30, 2017 at 6:18 am

      In several areas of Europe are already creating Islamic political parties. For now in the local scope but of course aspire to be of national scope. They say that they defend moral values ​​that the Europeans have forgotten … that sharia is not contrary to the constitutions and we should accept it. They flee their countries … and pretend to turn our countries into what they flee.

      • mummymovie says

        May 30, 2017 at 6:30 am

        I used to laugh at the idea that Sharia was a threat to any democratized, secular, free societies like those of Europe and here in the US.
        Now, three years later, my friend, I am no longer laughing.
        American counter-jihad organizations have the same objectives; we just to unite… and raise money for intense security details for our public representatives.
        These are terrifying times, but we must not submit; Otherwise, it’s over, and very soon at that.

        • eur says

          May 30, 2017 at 7:41 am

          This is not a joke. In Europe the hatred towards Muslims is growing and it is true that there are those who make gestures of disgust at seeing a woman with veil … and I think is true that there are those who spit and insult girls with hijab. It is also true that Muslims create religious political structures and they call them religion … when it is obvious that they are not. They are theocratic societies / communities and they are a huge threat … even the peaceful ones want the constitutions to contemplate sharia.

        • gravenimage says

          May 31, 2017 at 6:00 pm

          I know how you feel, mummymovie.

  34. PKG says

    May 30, 2017 at 5:56 am

    Sounds like it’s time for another counter poster by Pamela Geller listing all the countries where women DO NOT have a choice about displaying the symbol of their ultimate oppression!!!!!

  35. mummymovie says

    May 30, 2017 at 6:21 am

    The veil in any form is very obviously a symbol of oppression of women to any semi intelligent person.
    Gay men seem to have finally started to wise-up to the realization that being jettisoned off of rooftops in the near future might not be all that pleasant.
    Why are women not getting it yet with the 50 paced- walking behind men, headscarves, beatings, instant divorce, etc?
    The jihadists have done a fantastic job at co-opting women’s rights and civil rights movements.
    Also noteable is the brilliant component of the system that forces women to be visible to let us know their numbers increase and absorb the abuse, while the jihadist men proselytise, organize, and plot.
    Impressive.

  36. dumbledoresarmy says

    May 30, 2017 at 6:22 am

    Perhaps Bosch Fawstin can design a *counter-poster*.

    That can be put up right next to this one, everywhere it appears.

  37. FYI says

    May 30, 2017 at 7:26 am

    Perhaps we should have a few counter posters

    INFIDELS
    Do have the right to life

    FGM
    Stop Child cruelty NOW!

  38. Gamaliel says

    May 30, 2017 at 8:11 am

    Note it says she has the right not be called a threat. That means we who would call her a threat don’t have the right to do so. It means we don’t have the right to free speech.

    • somehistory says

      May 30, 2017 at 10:31 am

      We still have the right to free speech. This is an attempt to make us think we don’t. It is intimidation.

      Someone with money could make up buttons for NYorkers to wear saying, “I won’t be intimidated.”

  39. rubiconcrest says

    May 30, 2017 at 9:26 am

    Why is the city of New York telling Muslims how they should dress? Don’t they have a right to dress any way they want?

    • eur says

      May 30, 2017 at 10:58 am

      The same happens here in Europe with the refugee centers. They are provided with rooms for prayer, calls to prayer,halal food …. what happens is that those who were not devotees have the obligation to pray, to do the ramadan, to bear the calls to prayer, only eat Halal … we are preventing non-believers from living freely. We are contributing to the toxic control exercised by Muslims over others.

  40. Troybeam says

    May 30, 2017 at 9:45 am

    My Hijab My Choice: is a load of crap: Islam states women must cover themselves from head to toes, in Muslim countries women are killed in the streets for not wearing a hijab or covered properly.

    Here in the United States a battle is going on: Muslim taunting Americans on the hijab issue and filing false claims of attacks, Americans using it as point of dislike.

    The best way to confront this issue is the truth: learn it and speak up to Islam, confront the Muslim attacking the issue and know your facts, that shuts them up faster than arguing with them.

  41. John A. Marre says

    May 30, 2017 at 9:45 am

    Good. Now what will De Blasio do when someone robs a bank wearing a full-face covering?

  42. Capitalist-Dad says

    May 30, 2017 at 10:50 am

    Wear something unusual and then cry “Islamophobia” when someone does a double take. Their “religion” might be stuck in the 7th century, but they have certainly learned the modern technique of playing the whiny victim.

  43. Carolyne says

    May 30, 2017 at 12:02 pm

    Many Muslim women from the Middle East have mustaches. This is an opportunity to make these posters true-to-life.

    • Eur says

      May 30, 2017 at 1:57 pm

      The veil, hijab, chador … facilitates the task of identifying the Moroccan female of the Moroccan male. Both have a mustache …. maybe the woman is also distinguished in that she always looks pitiful, is plump (those over thirty) and wobble.

      • gravenimage says

        May 31, 2017 at 1:11 am

        Hijabs are not just worn in Morocco, Eur, but throughout much of the Muslim world.

        • eur says

          May 31, 2017 at 4:52 am

          I know, but from other parts of the world there are beautiful Muslim women (in spite of the hijab) … the Moroccans / Algerians / Mauritanians … almost all are horrible, ugly with a mustache. The Persians do not need a veil to be distinguished from the male … even there are very beautiful Arab women … the Maghrebies are unpleasant to see (there are exceptions)

        • gravenimage says

          May 31, 2017 at 6:14 pm

          Eur, I don’t believe that *anyone* should be forced to cover, attractive or not.

  44. Jessica Greenman says

    May 30, 2017 at 12:14 pm

    She does have that right, but shouldn’t have it because it IS a threat. Millions of women die or are raped because other women wear the hijab and basically it’s just sharia law which should be banned. Every stitch is bathed in blood. Someone should throw stones at the poster.

  45. s says

    May 30, 2017 at 1:35 pm

    self subjugation is the reality… the Hijab is the symbol of a willingness to be beaten, stoned, engaging in having a clitorectomy, acid in the face, divorced because a man says so 3x, death for someone’s supposed honor, have no rights, sit in the back of the mosque, and in some cases worthless non-driving, non-educated woman, no art, no music, no rights… except the “right” to wear a symbol of being inutile.

    • gravenimage says

      May 31, 2017 at 6:15 pm

      +1

  46. Ace-of-Clubs says

    May 30, 2017 at 4:34 pm

    I urge New Yorkers to tear these ridiculous posters down.

    • eur says

      May 31, 2017 at 6:46 am

      Islamberg(New York)…This is just the beginning.
      There are other religious communities. Amis for example … but the amis are not proselytizers nor do they pretend to impose their ideals. Muslims want the world to be like Islamberg

  47. UNCLE VLADDI says

    May 30, 2017 at 6:42 pm

    You should run counter-ads, quoting Sura 33:59 which orders women to wear the hijabs lest the muslim men “have to ” rape them, like they “have to rape” infidels!!

    So: Wearing the hijab isn’t a right, it’s a restriction!

    • gravenimage says

      May 31, 2017 at 6:18 pm

      Exactly, Uncle Vladdi:

      “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful.”

      In other words, it is Halal to abuse unveiled Infidel women.

  48. Bob says

    May 30, 2017 at 6:44 pm

    This is America. We don’t allow that. What’s the problem. Just tell them NO. We are having to give in to everyone that comes to America. What if cannibals come into our country, are we going to allow them to be allow to practice their belief? We are giving away our American Hermitage. I assure you, If we go to their country (any country) we would have to live by their laws.

  49. Saladbin says

    May 30, 2017 at 8:24 pm

    A bit of “Aussie Islamic Verse” – does the cult of Islam accept a bit of humour?:-

    Is Don is good…Islam is spam
    Allah’s given name was Gordon
    Throw another koransky on the barbie

    …more to follow if supported!

    • gravenimage says

      May 31, 2017 at 6:20 pm

      I love your username.

  50. Andre Paul says

    May 30, 2017 at 9:51 pm

    This has nothing to do with her faith.
    This has everything to do with the Muslin Brotherhood’s way to flag what they consider conquered territory.
    Islam means going backwards.

    • gravenimage says

      May 31, 2017 at 6:23 pm

      Andre, this is not just about the Muslim Brotherhood. *All* of Islam is like this.

  51. Cretius says

    May 31, 2017 at 7:56 am

    Yes, in a democracy where freedom of choice and freedom of speech are practised, the hijab is a matter of choice but in the Muslim world rejecting the hijab can result in death. So to non-Muslims the hijab is a sign of a woman’s inferiority to all men. Secular Muslims understand this fact and consequently do not choose to wear the hijab.

    • eur says

      May 31, 2017 at 8:18 am

      Muslim women who came to Europe years ago did not wear a veil, they mixed and they felt European, modern … free. Years ago when they were few there were also many who did not wear a veil, those same women now have veiled again. Why? It is evident, there is a social pressure, the Muslim community demands the veil of Muslim women, it is an unwritten law. If a woman wants to be well considered she should wear a veil. It is not a right … it is a social obligation of the Muslim community. That is not freedom.

  52. underbed cat says

    May 31, 2017 at 11:32 am

    Great article …exactly to the point. Looks like a new poster could be made with the stories of what happens when they don’t wear the hijab Islam sharia controlled countries…and woman from families who enforce sharia attached to this poster. Maybe it should show both covered and uncovered and who might face a brutal law of sharia. Does this human rights council protect the uncovered muslim women also?

    I sense a little hypocrisy with the intent of message.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • janicevanguilder on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Boycott Turkey on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • Yogi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Hoi Polloi on Why so many Muslims can’t wait for Biden to get inaugurated
  • Hoi Polloi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.