The establishment media is sticking to its narrative: Muslims are always and in every case victims who must be accorded special solicitude. When a Muslim commits jihad mass murder, the establishment media immediately kicks into “backlash” mode, behaving as if Muslims were the victims of the attack, and that the real threat is racist, bigoted “Islamophobes.”
This narrative is increasingly counterfactual, and has to be ever more frequently shored up with fake hate crimes. Those fake crimes are a no-lose proposition: the fake hate crime gets international front page headlines; the revelation that it was fake is relegated to page 37.
“Muslims in Manchester Fear Reprisals as ISIS Claims Responsibility for Concert Attack,” by Conor Gaffey, Newsweek, May 23, 2017:
In a run-down back street in the Northern Quarter of Manchester, England, less than a mile from the arena where a bomb killed 22 people on Monday, is the Muslim Youth Foundation (MYF), a local mosque and community center that runs programs for young people.
Pinned to a notice board in its lobby is a simple three-paragraph message, welcoming all to pray and attend activities at the center. Below, it includes an addendum: “We do not tolerate any kind of extremism or extremist ideologies inside this center.” And then, in red type: “We urge everybody to stay within the Islamic and the U.K. laws.”
That message has become all the more apt since Monday night, when a suicide bomber detonated an improvised explosive device at the end of an Ariana Grande concert, causing mayhem among the 20,000-strong fans flooding out of the arena.
On Tuesday, the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) said a “soldier of the Khilafah [caliphate]” was responsible for the attack. The attacker, who died detonating the device, has been unofficially named as 23-year-old Salman Abedi, though police have not responded to Newsweek’s request for confirmation.
Many of the city’s nearly quarter-million Muslims dread the seemingly inevitable backlash against their community. Mohamed Abdul Malek, an imam and trustee of the MYF, says the aftermath of such attacks is a time marked by fear. “I think with past experience, that fear is there in our [community], especially among women,” says Malek, 61, shuffling in his leather chair in a back room in the MYF’s office.
“But I pray and tell those who want to take revenge against Muslims that Muslims are equally victims of this act. Muslim youngsters were in the concert. The taxi drivers who helped take youngsters to their homes—some of them would be Muslims. People in the city center are Muslims. We are part of this community, and what hurts the community hurts us,” he adds….
Malek, the imam, says he is concerned that radical ideology appears to have taken root among some young Muslims in Manchester. “We are worried that young people could do such a thing. One wonders where did this young man get hold of these explosives, how did he connect with the people who helped him to enact this,” he says.
But that radicalization comes alongside something else: a rise in anti-Muslim hate crimes, in part stoked by attacks claimed by ISIS in Brussels and Paris, as well as the aftermath of the U.K.’s vote to leave the European Union. In December 2016, the Muslim Council of Britain urged British politicians to urgently address Islamophobia in the face of growing attacks against Muslims in the U.K. Figures released in October 2016 showed that hate crimes against Muslims in London had increased 65 percent on the previous year.
At the MYF, young men shuffle past gathering journalists and file downstairs to attend the midday prayers. Malek says he will be instructing his congregation to speak out against the attack, but also to be vigilant for their own safety. “The Muslim community should clearly show its support for the victims of this act, should do whatever it can to lessen the impact of this act. But at the same time, [they] should take precautions against people who might target them for being Muslims,” he says….
Halal Bacon says
too little, too late
Saleem Smith says
We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that Sharia law is Mohammedan theology applied. Full obedience to Islamic theology creates widespread jihad and the horrors of Islamic rule.
Islam is no “religion of peace.” Islam is primarily a religion of “injustice, intolerance, hatred, and violence.” The fact is, if we non-Muslims were to say about Muslims what the Qur’an says about us, we would be arrested for hate speech. The Qur’an largely preaches discrimination, death, and imposition of its dogma on everyone. Certainly some Muslims will be offended by such statements, but frankly, so what? Judaism and Christianity, the world’s two other major monotheistic religions, have had to face the harshest of scrutiny and criticism for several hundred years which continues to this day. Islam must not be granted any special privileges or be exempt from such treatment – the implications are of tremendous importance.
Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:
“One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur’an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way…
The statement continues,
Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.”
mortimer says
Saleem, thanks for your courage fight to reveal the truth to people who do not want to hear it.
I take away from your excellent essay that Muslims like Salman Abedi are imitating Mohammed. Nothing can be done to improve the amoral character of Mohammed, because the Sira and hadiths cannot be rewritten. Muslims cannot invent their own ‘reformed Islam’ because of those vicious foundational texts. Viciousness is part of imitating Mohammed.
Demsci says
Mortimer, your summing up of Sira and Hadiths is incomplete. And of course the Quran you know well. This trilogy cannot be rewritten and are at the heart of Islam.
But we learn from Jay Smith that, from Al Tabari, in the 10th century, on there were a number of almost “canonized” Tafsirs, like “Al Jalalayn, al Ghazali, explainers of Quran-Sira-Hadiths. And after the Tafsirs I suppose came the Islamic schools of thought, and Al Azhar, and thousands of Islamic Scholars, up to and until today.
So I see Islam as a monolith with these 5 components; Quran, Sira, Hadiths, Tafsirs and Islamic Scholars. Together this corpus has most Muslims in it’s thrall. And together they provide a clear picture of Islam, which is what we here all dread, hate and despise so much.
But it is the reformers and especially the apologists of Islam who, mostly in a muddled or deceiving way use the subterfuge of pointing out that although Quran-Sira-Hadiths cannot be changed for one iota, them being considered “Divine”, the weak spot of normative Islam are the Tafsirs and the Islamic Scholars, of past and present.
The reformers and apologists tell us that the Tafsirs/ Scholars are human and that the trilogy may be interpreted in a different way from theirs. So according to them the MECCAN verses may be used instead of abrogated and Mohammed’s examples can be made descriptive instead of prescriptive. And then one can still be a Muslim.
I no longer believe (in) the reformers and apologists, but it seems important to me, that you, who tells us so much useful info about Islam and it’s current situation,
that you should paint a more comprehensive picture of the parts of Islam and whether or not Quran-Sira-Hadiths are clear ALL BY THEMSELVES or if they NEED the Tafsirs/ Islamic Scholars for clarity and if so, can the Tafsirs/ Scholars be discarded or not.
Robert says
Thanks, Saleem. After two decades of studying Islam, I came to the same conclusions, although my appraisal of the founder was less measured than the one you cited. Nonetheless, it was a pleasure to read the Bangladeshi Apostates’ Vision Statement. Hearing insiders speak the truth about Islam is so refreshing!
Anyone who has not yet read Islam’s trilogy of founding documents, the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sira, ought to obtain and study them carefully. They will reward you with chilling insights about the real Islam. Let’s just say, It ain’t pretty.
Duplicity, murder, rape, political assassinations, religious persecutions, false alliances, double-crossings, mass executions, robbery, pedophilia — you name the sin, the founder committed it.
roger woodhouse says
Islam without jihad could not exist.Those here in England talk about reforming it or ‘deradicalising’it are living in a dream world.Islam throughout its existance has only been spread by the sword and maintained by fear.Wherever it has tried to expand itself it has been faced with eventually violent resistance and has been forcibly removed.We face the same outcome here today.
No Fear says
Has Newsweek published stories about Christians and non muslims being killed in muslim countries?
gravenimage says
Yes, they have–surprisingly, including a fine piece by Ayaan Hirsi Ali in 2012.
But my guess is that this has been far outstripped by puff pieces about how nervous Muslims are in the wake of *Muslim* savagery against Infidels.
Westman says
Where are infidels bombing Muslim gatherings? Where is the “Holy” book that says infidels should not take Muslims as friends? Where are the infidel congregations that forbid what some “guy in the sky” forbids? Where are the infidel patrols telling Muslimas how to dress after calling them prostitutes?
This victim BS is just more lying, the crown jewel of Islam.
Westman says
Not one Mosque in Europe has barricades to stop a car bombing. Can’t say the same for Jewish synagogues and US embassies.
Fearful Muslims? – Newsweek fake news.
gravenimage says
Exactly, Westman.
Aloha Akbar says
Stop the world, I wanna get off.
WW says
Lol
gravenimage says
Newsweek: “Muslims in Manchester fear reprisals” after jihad massacre
……………………….
We all knew this was coming, and sooner rather than later.
Muslims slaughter innocent Infidels; Muslims claim *they* are the real victims; Infidels scramble to assure Muslims that they will not be harmed, even though they were never threatened to begin with.
Mission accomplished; the actual victims are forgotten, and Infidels feel more unearned guilt over the phantom of “backlash”.
Rinse, repeat ad nauseum.
Budvarakbar says
Do not forget the flowers and tea lights
nicu says
So so true : tea lights , prayers and flowers ….
why nobody is angry and reacts , finally ? 🙁
Phil Copson says
No, no – get it right ! For a committed Liberal, only balloons and bears will address the gravity of the situation. (or – if you happen to be the Mayor of Manchester, making a vacuous, vomit-inducing speech about how Manchester will deal with things “cohesively” (whatever that means…), “Love is Stronger than Hate” blah, blah, blah etc, but never a word about how they intend to tackle Islamic fundamentalism and save lives.
Jean Terry says
That is the total truth.
Paul says
I listened to a radio station and there was some disgusting Mohammedan woman
in floods of (crocodile) tears, expressing her supposed fear over going out and
being exposed to negativity (you could always renounce your evil cult?).
Scores of dead kids and injured and SHE is the victim!
I can’t quite put into words the sense of disgust I felt at this utter obscenity, though
I should really be used to this sort of vile opportunistic crap at the hands of
sociopaths by now.
rich mills says
i could just do with a damn good backlash now, i would feel a lot better!
Ginger says
BBC radio news is at it again at this moment. I just switched off. Within hours of the atrocity, presenters and reporters at the BBC early morning news programme were pushing the backlash theme, choosing to ignore the fact that there is never a backlash, apart from a few strong verbal reactions.
Mind you, they are in good company, ie the police chief of Manchester, the bishop of Manchester and a gaggle of politicians. Muslims, naturally, play the victim card for all they are worth, knowing that the dumb libtards will fall for it every time.
Gen Jones says
? (tiny violin)
gravenimage says
Brilliant, Gen.
Karen says
Speaks volumes!
somehistory says
Psychopaths always think of themselves and only themselves. As someone I know told me, “It’s all about *me*” with the psychopath. They are expert at pretending to care about others…but it is only pretense.
Those adhering to islum always…without exception…point to themselves after every terror attack as the ones who live in fear. They live in fear that a *backlash* that never comes will come for them.
He says they must stay within “islamic” law. That means it is okay to commit these terror attacks…but he is pretending that it does not, that somehow, it adds to the law-abiding attitudes and practices of moslums.
What hogwash.
Jean Terry says
I agree with you completely.
Danforth says
“We do not tolerate any kind of extremism or extremist ideologies inside this center.” And then, in red type: “We urge everybody to stay within the Islamic and the U.K. laws.”
Nudge, nudge, wink, wink. However, boys, OUTSIDE of this center, it’s a whole other ballgame. The Islamic (Sharia) and U.K. laws are totally at odds with one another. Gosh, I wonder, as a devout Muslim, which I should obey? I’ve been told for my entire life (as a Muslim) there is only ONE law.
And a half-million Muslims in Manchester? Did anyone catch that? What percentage do 500,000 Muslims represent in this northern British community?
Danforth says
Sorry, a re-read says “a quarter-million”. My apologies to those who will double this population within the next twenty years.
Danforth says
From Wikipedia: “Manchester (/ˈmæntʃᵻstər/) is a city and metropolitan borough in Greater Manchester, England, with a population of 530,300 as of 2015. It lies within the United Kingdom’s second-most populous urban area, with a population of 2.55 million.”
Can it be that Muslims represent nearly 47% of the population of the city of Manchester? Or almost 10% of the “United Kingdom’s second-most populous urban area”? Somehow this seems like a very high number.
gravenimage says
Danforth, estimates are that Manchester is a little under 8.7% Muslim:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_Greater_Manchester#Religion
Danforth says
gravenimage, thanks for the update but your reference is based on 2011 census figures. Declared Muslims grew at 85.9% over the years 2001 to 2011, while the overall population grew at just 8%.
If growth rates have stayed consistent for the previous six years, 2017 figures would put Muslims at 351,500 or 12.4% of the total Greater Manchester Region.
My point is simply this; With a Muslim component now exceeding 12%, and those folks likely supporting Sharia, it is understandable, through sheer numbers, this event did not happen earlier.
Anon says
Response to Islamic terror: We have to learn to live with it.
Response to people who don’t like Islam: We have to work very hard to change it.
Karen says
Very, very good point.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Anon.
Peggy says
Maybe when our traitors learn to live with it and stop hiding behind security can they say that.
Why do we have to learn to live with it? Why is it necessary?
It’s time we tell those traitors in government, academia, entertainment and media that it’s time they smartened up or we’ll come for them.
This is the only solution.
Boston Tea Party says
“Muslims fear anti-Islamic backlash will follow tomorrow’s planned train bombing.”
gravenimage says
+1
Jean Terry says
Well, maybe they should help stop this stuff. England prosecutes it’s own citizens for twitter comments if they are negative to Muslims or terrorists. I blame the leadership of these countries for their mindless political correctness.
nicu says
And again hypocrite Merkel speaks her condolences and how we stick together , bla bla — when you resist a Muslim in gGrmany or defend yourself you get arrested .
A Russian bus driver ” dared ” to ask for tickets they said they had any so he kicked them out – and lost his job ! 🙁 they never pay or get controlled ! even the older headcarfs never pay 🙁
common sense says
It was sooner ratber than later. How fast was that Imam at the Orlando shooting making statements in conjunction with the police.
They might as well start putting permanent signs up “in case of mentally ill attack be nice to Muslims”.
Christ almighty the families are still in shock and deeply hurt, as far as hurt can go in any human.
Berengaria says
The Whiny Voiced Muslims have attained a perfect excuse for whatever heinous act, that one of their number may commit on the host population.
The Muslims access the Media, a few minutes, after an act of Terror is committed. The Muslims’ view of fear of their host Nation allows them to receive favorable coverage, from the sympathetic Press!
WHAT A RACKET! It makes them even more DETESTABLE. I have Zero Tolerance for these savages.
American Pragmatism says
Who would have ever predicted this narrative?!
jewdog says
An example of the weakness in Western morality: Often too nice to defend us adequately.
Boston Tea Party says
Well I think that’s it. Whereas Western society used to (however imperfectly) pursue truth and justice, we’ve given up on that—now “being nice” has become our highest moral principle. And the end of that road will certainly not be “nice.”
Joeyn says
Unfortunately the mainstream media journalists and and most politicians in the West comprise of Islamists and Leftists and all they do is spew fake and crap news. This kind of journalism was at one time only found in Islamic nations but now it has also hit the West big time.
Matthieu Baudin says
“…Pinned to a notice board in its lobby is a simple three-paragraph message, welcoming all to pray and attend activities at the center. Below, it includes an addendum: “We do not tolerate any kind of extremism or extremist ideologies inside this center.” And then, in red type: “We urge everybody to stay within the Islamic and the U.K. laws…”
They can choose either Islamic Law or U.K. laws but not both. Those who choose Islamic Law should prepare to leave the country; those committed to U.K. law and the spirit of the law can stay. Sharia and U.K. law are separate and intrinsically in conflict, one with the other. Nothing can smooth the edges. The current ‘apartheid style’ fashionable thinking that each ‘community’ or ‘cultural entity’ can live by its own laws in a parallel social or religious ghetto is a fiction promulgated by the moronic preaching of Postmodern academics over the past decades – it can now be seen for the nonsense that it always was.
BLC says
“Muslims in Manchester fear reprisals” – Well that’s just too damned bad, isn’t it?
Shazza says
They are urged to stay within the law. This sounds very loose, what about ‘Obey the UK Law.’ Also, Malik the leader will instruct his congregation to speak out against the attacks.
Decent human beings don’t need to be told to do these basic things and help people too without expecting a gold medal.
CogitoErgoSum says
Oh, you crazy Muslims,
f you are tired of living in fear and dread of what other Muslims are doing to make non-Muslims fear and dread you, maybe … just maybe … it is time for you to stop being a Muslim. If you can’t convince people that this terrorism is NOT being done in accordance with the very scriptures that the terrorists themselves quote and explain (much better and more convincingly than the majority of you can) … then maybe, just maybe, it’s time for you to find another religion or way of life that truly is based upon the peace and harmony you purportedly desire so much.
Think about it. Living in peace and harmony with others is but an unobtainable illusion for those who seek to find such in the realm of Islam. Convincing the world to believe that Islam is a religion of peace and harmony is becoming more and more difficult with each terror attack, isn’t it? Can’t you see that truly Islam does not offer peace? There is no harmony even among Muslims themselves. It is becoming glaringly obvious that Islam offers only submission to fear and dread … and fear and dread are not conditions conducive to a healthy state of mind for anyone. Just as night follows day, insanity and acts of insanity will surely ensue if the traumatic conditions we are seeing now are allowed to continue indefinitely. It all has to come to an end.
Oh yes, this is what Islam brings to the world: fear and dread with no end in sight … unless insanity is to be considered the proper and fitting ending for mankind. Isn’t it ironic? Man has always taken pride in the ability of his mind to ensure his survival. Now it seems as though man’s mind will also ensure his own demise. As the terror continues the fear and dread will weigh upon the minds of more and more people and greater and greater acts of insanity will ensue … until death is considered more desirable than life. But then death is the promise of Islam. The terrorists speak of it. This is what Islam brings to the world. It is a gift of madness … an idea which sprang from the mind of a man obviously criminally insane.
So …….. peace and harmony or submission to insanity and death. Truly it is a question of to be or not to be. Whether you are Muslim or not, just use your mind to think about where a madman can lead you. The end result that I now see is not a dream but rather a frightening nightmare …. a nightmare for those, that is, who still have a grasp on their sanity.
rubiconcrest says
Yes the truth is slowly becoming visible through the smoke and mirrors of the press and Muslim spokesmen. The words we can’t quite make out are becoming visible to even those with the thickest of skulls … ‘Islam is terror’.
Eur says
The exit door is open.Muslims … go away
Demsci says
If Muslims fear such a backlash, why don’t they think deeply about it. Whose fault would such a backlash be? What would be the cause? Even as it won;t happen physically, it must be true that ever more people are being ever more anti-Islam and wary of Muslims.
If Muslims even had an ounce of logical reasoning and sense of accountability, wouldn’t they at some point arrive at the conclusion that their own “beloved” religion is the critical factor in the backlash and it’s unpopularity???
They should think, and told to think it as much, that “If this is what Islam produces, I want out!” And I want to change sides and I will openly join the non-Muslims and ex-Muslims or proclaim I want out. They can’t kill all of us apostates.
Muslims in big numbers demonstrably leaving Islam would be an appropriate reaction to atrocities by Muslims with Western friends and colleagues, and a punishing one for both ISIS and it’s hidden supporters everywhere. And it should be in vogue that in reaction to such horrible terroristic attacks it is asked of Muslims; “Why do you stay in this dysfunctional religion?!
Any good sensible reaction by Muslims today to these attacks is totally missing. They keep insisting that such attacks have nothing to do with “real Islam” without convincing arguments, and never admit that they are accountable by association.
They expect other people to see a distinction between violent/ hostile and “normative” Muslims, but the line between is very blurred. But Muslims and Political Corrects never take that as a clue to change their reaction to atrocities.
simpleton1 says
Demci;- yes they do have a choice, and that is a good point. ““Why do you stay in this dysfunctional religion?!”
Amadayya, Druze and perhaps there a sects of islam that may be truly peaceful.
Another faith is the Bahai, that stretched out from islam.
Then there is the other 2 branches with many variants of the Abrahamic religions.
To consider Buddhist, Hindu, and etc.
Or a complete break, atheism.
All would give individuals much support in learning of new ways
dumbledoresarmy says
I hope that the authorities in Manchester will surprise-raid and search the “Muslim Youth Centre” – it is the mosque nearest to the epicentre of the attack…”less than a mile from the arena”. And they should interrogate its imam, Mohamed Abdul Malek, and they should also search his *house* and every other set of premises associated with the mosque. Army sappers should be part of the search, and sniffer dogs. I wouldn’t trust a word that Mr Mohamed Abdul Malek says, nor that of any other mohammedan associated with that dingy little mosque. I’d raid the place, NOW, and go through it like a bucket of salts, from attic to basement.
I hope that, right now, somebody is combing through all CCTV footage from the vicinity of that ‘Muslim Youth Centre’, going back at least three months, with a view to finding out whether the perpetrator of the attack *frequented the mosque*.
In Sydney, when Curtis Cheng, a Chinese-Aussie police accountant, was gunned down by a young Mohammedan, that young Mohammedan had *just been* to a mosque just down the road. He got his *weapon* there.
Jihad issues from the mosque. Always has, and always does.
Warmac9999 says
If you wait for the authorities you will get no justice.
Frank Courtney says
Many people in the UK are realising that lighting candles and holding hands while singing “Kumbaya” just does cut it any more.
Frank Courtney says
“does not”, of course.
Frank Courtney says
Setting fire to mosque door: “hate crime” that police say “will not be tolerated”.
Meanwhile jihadis known to the police are free to walk the streets of Manchester.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3634246/arsonists-set-fire-mosque-door-fears-race-hate-after-manchester-bombing/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4535886/3-000-jihadists-streets-Britain-monitor-struggle.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4535626/SUE-REID-Manchester-crucible-extremism.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4535942/seven-extremists-Britain-anti-terror-orders.html
Adrian says
“We urge everybody to stay within the Islamic and the U.K. laws.”
It is a measure of the clueless insanity of reporters and the general public this statement does not ring loud fire alarms…
A full 17 years after 9/11, and our leaders and media are as ignorant of Islamic doctrine and law as they were before…
DISGRACEFUL
Stuart Smith says
Backlash should include things like I do already, do not use any muslim business at all, you call a taxi if he has the looks of a typical muslim, ie silly beard white thing on his head, are you a muslim? yes, then get another taxi, do not use their shops, kebab places, I never use due to my hatred of the halal system.
They have no income they go away.
It works.
Warmac9999 says
If there were any real men in Manchester, they would march on the killers mosque and knock it down to rubble. Vigils are for women and children. Men are inherently beings of action.
Regan says
CBC (Canada) is showcasing an ‘expert’ panel today who insist there have been very few terrorist acts in recent years, there is no significant threat and the media has been fear mongering. CBC should change its name to Globalist Vomit Television.
Jerry says
But at the same time, [they] should take precautions against people who might target them for being Muslims,” he says…
By “target” he must mean if they are ever confronted with the truth about their own violent religion and the terror it causes. Or maybe he means if a blind person tries to take a muslim’s cab with their guide dog. Or if a Christian offends them with a cross of Christ or uncovered hair. Or a conservative newspaper or tv show dares to be satirical or truthful about islam. Or an ambulance tries to help a muslim in an enclave. Or the parents of a raped child dare to speak out about it. Ya know how we non-muslims can be, we’re always looking for ways to goad muslims into murder and acts of terror.
Steve Brown says
“We urge everybody to stay within the Islamic and the U.K. laws.”
What happens when these clash as was the case Monday. Obviously Islamic Law takes precedence.
Norger says
Precisely. “Islamic law” and U.K. law are irreconcilable.
John A. Marre says
Awww, the poor dears. What they should be doing is reporting Jihadis to the police! But them won’t.
Eur says
Even the so-called peaceful Muslims are not democrats, they want theocracy. It is impossible to live with these people, it is impossible.
Norger says
I just heard the Deputy Mayor of Manchester on BBC radio. She said it’s very important to call this attack exactly what it is, and I thought “good, for once a politician won’t obfuscate the ideological basis for jihad terrorism. She then went to say that this was “extremism” and that Muslims were no more likely to commit acts of terrorism than any other religious group (Quakers perhaps) and I started yelling at my radio. What will it take for reality to set in with these people? 22 deaths (children at that)is clearly not enough; 22,000; 22,000,000?
Phil Copson says
Norger – they’ll just keep on lying and denying until the day the sky falls in.
Think about it – how many European politicians and civil servants ever quit their jobs and fought the Nazis?
And how many held onto their jobs and served their new masters ? Exactly……
Phil Copson says
England 1940: “Today, a force of 250 enemy aircraft attacked the docks and residential areas of the East End of London. It is reported that the docks have been set ablaze for several miles, shipping has been sunk, several hundred houses have been completely destroyed, and there has been great loss of life. Addressing the House of Commons, the Prime Minister, Theresa May, said that “It is still too early to know who was responsible……”
Tom says
What a load of bulls**t !! All muslims have to do is step up and condemn the attacks as a community, start being overtly patriotic to the UK, and join in the anti terror movement.
We all would welcome muslims who are prepared to stand up to the radical Islamic wave of Jihad.
Any takers ????
LilyDarcey says
Get ready for an increase in self victimization hate crime by these moslem opportunists. Moslems, like liberals, are very good at this.
Liz says
The West will be held accountable if Islam takes over. The souls of your children and future generations, you will account for.
abad says
Don’t worry, not a single Muslim in the UK will be apologetic for the Manchester bomber.
Instead, the UK Muslim population is far more worried about how they are treated.
The truth is this:
Muslims need to be concerned with how they treat non-Muslims and that includes wanting to kill non-Muslims. They need to stop worrying about how they are treated by non-Muslims.