In this new video, I calls on Americans to protest Sharia promoter Linda Sarsour’s commencement speech at CUNY. Linda Sarsour is pro-Sharia, so here is a thought experiment: what if her husband started to go all Sharia on her, and forbade her to speak, or even barred her from leaving their house? What would the feminists who hail her as a hero say then?
As David Wood notes: “No one is saying that Linda shouldn’t be allowed to speak at CUNY. (Robert even challenges her to a debate.) The protest is about Linda being the COMMENCEMENT SPEAKER for the graduation. The commencement speaker is the university’s choice for who gives the final “send off” for the graduates. CUNY chose a Sharia proponent for the final send off. That’s what’s being protested. CUNY is trying to ram Sharia down students’ and parents’ throats.”
Video thanks to David Wood.
mortimer says
Sarsour is an ANTI-FEMINIST who promotes PATRIARCHY, MISOGYNY and GENDER APARTHEID.
The fact that she is being granted ‘permission’ by her husband to do this is a sign that he is a jihadist.
Sarsour is conducting VERBAL JIHAD in order to bring repression of women’s freedom to the West.
mortimer says
Western universities are welcoming totalitarians and imposing censorship in the belief that their opinions are infallible.
However, censorship is a sign that one lacks confidence in one’s theories. Censorship by the Left is a sign that they actually know Muslims are not their friends.
Peter Buckley says
Am I the only to notice that Sarsour’s claim that Muhammad was “the first victim of Islamophobia” actually contradicts Islamic teaching?
Islamic belief holds that Allah sent thousands of “messengers” (though muslims can only name the ones Muhammad knew about). ALL these “messengers” were muslims, according to Islamic belief. Some of these “messengers” (Jesus is an obvious one) were maligned and attacked (and killed, in the case of Jesus). Therefore, “Islamophobia” occurred at least every time the “messenger” was delivering his message. Therefore, the poor deluded woman either doesn’t know her own religion (surprisingly common amongst muslims, but not amongst Islamists), or she has is deliberately lying, simply in order to “martyr” her prophet.
Please pass this on to anyone who might publicly debate Sarsour in the future.
How about it, RS, David Wood? Brigitte Gabriel? etc…….
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Totally off topic: In Minneapolis an Infidel person saw trash thrown from a parked SUV onto the ground. He went up and confronted the occupants, who told him to screw off and brandished guns for encouragement. The Infidel person called 911 and the cops rolled. The vehicle was packed with guns, bomb making equipment, electronics, and even drone parts. The case has been referred to the DHS.
The men had Arabic names; both were bearded. Beyond that, the Mpls Star Tribune newspaper made no mention of Islam or Jihad. Now the DHS faces a problem: how do they sweep this episode under the rug without filing charges, which would only tick off the Moslems. The incident took place in the district of Keith Ellison D-MN, who is now the number two man at the DNC.
Robert Spencer says
APF:
Read Jihad Watch!
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/05/minneapolis-muslims-littering-leads-to-discovery-of-their-weapons-arsenal-and-bomb-making-equipment
underbed cat says
Any doctrine that she would promote such as sharia law, which if followed is a call for jihad should not be allowed. Apparently the university has been deceived…if they read the Q book they would understand just reading the first 8 suras. The silencing about the doctrine….which claims no borders, yes it is not woman friendly, but most importantly it is not peaceful to non-muslims. Of course it is hateful in the muslims eyes to know about these verses…..but the facts would stop this from being spread, that is why they hate the facts to be revealed and the people who are aware.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Who are all the heroes displayed on Robert’s bookshelf? The nametag identifies Vida Blue, and we can recognize D. J. Trump, and H. R. Clinton, but who is that bald, bearded, rotund matryoshka doll with the wide tie? V. I. Lenin? Leon Trotsky? M. S. Gorbachev? Kremlinologists want to know.
Robert Spencer says
Mark,
That is indeed a V. I. Lenin Russian nesting doll. Inside are all the “Red Czars” and their successors, down to a very, very minuscule Vladimir Putin.
JIMJFOX says
How does this approach gell with demands for ‘free speech’, even though such speech may be hateful?
Whilst Sarsour is indeed execrable, denying her that freedom flies in the face of reason.
It is about time that freedom of speech/expression was defined in law, as there seems to be no such definition at present. The only limitations should be on demands for murder, torture, etc. ‘Hate’ is not sufficient reason, provided it does not make such demands.
utis says
I hope some students have the guts to walk out on her, like the ones who walked out on Pence at Notre Dumb. It’s a meme guys, roll with it.
Seriously, she has a right to speak, but people don’t have an obligation to listen, or even pretend to listen. They should pull out their Bibles or Gitas or Analects of Confucius, or even their favorite porn rags, and start reading.
Politicianphobia says
People should wise up, grow up, stand up to this vile, Shari’ah promoting SKANK.