“A taxpayer funded study has made the audacious claim that Australians need to show ‘cultural sensitivity’ towards migrant men who physically abuse their wife and children….The study refers to some refugees claiming that these rights ‘contravene the cultural values, norms and mores’ of their ethnic groups…Yet the study has faced strong resistance in the shape of federal Minister for Women Michaelia Cash who has stated Australia is categorically against family violence.”
This problem may not be solved now, but it will have to be faced eventually, not just in Australia but in all non-Muslim countries: are Muslims allowed to break the law of the land in order to follow their religion, or is the law of the land paramount? Will wife-beating be legal or illegal, or legal if you’re Muslim but not if you’re not Muslims?
Such questions will determine whether or not free societies will survive.
“Australians should show ‘sensitivity’ to migrants whose cultures ‘don’t value women’s and child’s rights’ claims new domestic violence study,” by Tom Flanagan, Daily Mail Australia, June 16, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
A taxpayer funded study has made the audacious claim that Australians need to show ‘cultural sensitivity’ towards migrant men who physically abuse their wife and children.
The study conducted over a three year period was funded by the Australian Research Council and points out that some human rights affect migrants’ integration and ‘successful settlement in Australia’, specifically those in relation to women and children.
The study refers to some refugees claiming that these rights ‘contravene the cultural values, norms and mores’ of their ethnic groups, according to The Daily Telegraph.
Yet the study has faced strong resistance in the shape of federal Minister for Women Michaelia Cash who has stated Australia is categorically against family violence.
‘Violence against women is unacceptable in any circumstances,’ Ms Cash told The Saturday Telegraph.
The study has however called for ‘cultural sensitivity and understanding of the impact on male refugees’ who suffer a sense of separation and an overwhelming feeling of disappointment when their views are repulsed by society.
The report did point out refugees’ appreciation for the factors of Australian life such as healthcare and education that were not available to them in their home nations, yet a ‘major point of contention’ was the differing views on women’s and children’s rights.
What was most upsetting for many refugees was the strong stance Australians had when it came to domestic violence.
It will be this Australian ethos that will repel the study’s findings with many in union with Prevention of Domestic Violence Minister Pru Goward who insists wife beaters must ‘change their ways.’
A recent example of the nation’s position on the matter was its reaction towards Sydney primary school teacher Reem Allouche telling the women’s arm of hardline political group Hizb ut-Tahrir that men are permitted to hit women with sticks….
Adrian says
It is not only Muslims who need to be de-programmed, but their enablers in Western governments and the media.
utis says
Absolutely right.
mortimer says
When an empathy RESPECTS a TOXIC NARCISSIST, the NARC responds by being MORE ABUSIVE!
Muslims are in a GROUP TOXIC NARCISSIST CULT. They react to compassion by further abuse until they annihilate the empathy.
Islam is a SADOMASOCHISTIC DEATH CULT. Islam CANNOT be REFORMED.
Narcissists cannot be healed by LOVE… a narc DOES NOT understand love or compassion. They see it as narcissistic supply that makes them even more narcissistic.
gravenimage says
Yes–Muslims consider compassion nothing but a sign of weakness.
Minutes1234 says
Indeed !
Patzy says
They should be arrested. That is assault!
billybob says
“What was most upsetting for many refugees was the strong stance Australians had when it came to domestic violence.”
Is this problem some kind a Zen koan they we are supposed to find a solution to? The solution is simple – these people are barbaric savages do not belong in Australia in the first place! If for some reason they absolutely have to be rescued out of some sense of compassion, then they must be put into concentration camps with the men separated from the women and children until they can return home. Perhaps some path can be found for the few of them who are demonstrably capable of learning Western values to join Western society while the rest remain safely behind barbed wire.
Aloha Akbar says
They are very clever at ‘demonstrating’ that they can learn Western values and join Western society. But what happens days, weeks or even years down the track when they are righteously offended by some western custom & turn into a brainwashed killing machine?
gravenimage says
“What was most upsetting for many refugees was the strong stance Australians had when it came to domestic violence.”
……………………
Yes–this is sickening.
PRCS says
Domestic violence? Remember these two idiots?
Australia: Islamic group produces video calling wife-beating “a beautiful blessing”
http://tinyurl.com/lngt4jv
gravenimage says
Yes, I do. *Ugh*. Thanks for the link, PRCS.
tim gallagher says
Spot on billybob. They are indeed barbaric savages and shouldn’t be in any civilised non-Muslim country. The answer is to keep all Muslims out of all non-Muslim countries. There’s no other sensible solution. Yet they keep being allowed into non-Muslim countries and then they are nothing but trouble. It’s too late then. But this idea of compromising our progressive civilisations to make the savages feel more at home is disgusting. And that a taxpayer-funded government body comes up with such a garbage survey is even more sickening.
Emilie Green says
“A taxpayer funded study has made the audacious claim that Australians need to show ‘cultural sensitivity’ towards migrant men who physically abuse their wife and children….”
And here on Fathers Day, what better way to let your Muslim neighbor (did a chill just go down your spine?) know you know all about other cultures and to show him real friendship to than presenting him with a wooden-handled whip, with say five 30-inch leather whip strands, each strand end having been dipped in hot lead.
That’ll show her who’s boss.
Ashley says
I agree.
The very fact that such a study was funded and conducted is appalling.
We can’t have disappointed male refugees, now can we? Better to have battered women and children.
gravenimage says
Yes–repulsive.
And Ashley–slightly OT–thanks for your kind words to me on the thread where Muslims were abusing cats as well as women and children. Much appreciated.
Ashley says
GI…no need for thanks. I feel nothing but anger, resentment and blind rage regarding the matter.
You are a survivor.
What blows my mind is that you have seen fit to expand your survival skills to enlighten others. You do so with such finesse.
You remind me of my sixth grade school teacher. “Today kids, we are going to attempt to parse a paragraph.”
The teacher sucked at the lesson.
You ace it…always!
gravenimage says
This means a lot to me, Ashley.
It took me a while to realize that as awful as my experiences were, that they gave me some unique insights.
And don’t be too hard on your sixth grade teacher–she might have been new to enlightening tweens on English grammar. 🙂
Ashley says
The study has however called for ‘cultural sensitivity and understanding of the impact on male refugees’ who suffer a sense of separation and an overwhelming feeling of disappointment when their views are repulsed by society.
____________________________
Each and every member of the Australian Research Council needs to have their head examined.
Emilie Green says
Calling “for ‘cultural sensitivity and understanding of the impact on male refugees’ who suffer a sense of separation and an overwhelming feeling of disappointment when their views are repulsed by society.”
Who gives a rat’s a** about their disappointment. Muslim practices are repulsive. As Sam Harris admitted, “Islam is the mother lode of bad ideas.”
The disappointments of the citizens of these host countries in having had knucklehead officials letting these Muslim creatures into the country in the first place is boundless.
Custos Custodum says
Any country that has BOTH:
– “Minister for Women Michaelia Cash”
AND
– “Prevention of Domestic Violence Minister Pru Goward”
is NOT a country that respects women’s rights. IT IS A COUNTRY CIRCLING THE PLUG HOLE.
A country whose society respects women and non-violence does NOT delegate these tasks to a government lackey.
Anyone who has watched gangster-themed movies realizes that the most potent power of a DA or U.S. Attorney is the power to allow specific crimes and criminals to go unpunished in return for benefits.
It is quite naive to think that having these two overlapping government jobs (each no doubt with a massive staff of “researchers,” “outreach specialists,” etc.) are evidence of Australia’s commitment to fighting such abuses. On the contrary, this kind of malignant bureaucratic growth shows that civil society – family, church, neighborhoods, private enterprise, etc. – has BROKEN DOWN, and the subject has become a never-ending kabuki of government-sector pencil-pushing, log-rolling and narrative-churning.
BASIC RULE: No organization can sustain itself on a mission of pure compassion for more than 5-10 years unless strong motives of self-interest are also engaged.
Similarly, making a government position de facto women-only does NOT show commitment to the substantive importance of the portfolio.
Think about it: If these functions were really intended to be important, what better way for an ambitious male politician to shine in them! In reality, it’s little more than jobs for the girls under a mask of caring and compassion. It is certainly true that there is a women’s perspective (and more importantly, a children’s perspective) that often falls by the wayside.
Conversely, however, there are important aspects of domestic violence documented through many cases where the role of women was very far from admirable. In particular, the very common scenario of an “single mother’s” current “boyfriend” violently abusing and raping the woman’s children from earlier relationships. Who speaks up for the countless children thus fundamentally betrayed BY THEIR MOTHERS?
utis says
Usual questions:
Who are the writers/researchers? Are any of them muslims? Do they have degrees?
Who is the issuing body? Academics? Political hacks? Both?
Finally, do they not realize they are making islam more attractive to idiots who want to have 4 wives (good luck with paying for and herding that pack, plus the competing siblings you spawn, buddy). The fact they can keep the pack in line by beating them like common slaves, just makes it all better. And the idiots won’t have die in jihad.
Ashley says
Utis…you might find this interesting.
http://www.deakin.edu.au/adi/our-research/projects/islamic-religiosity-and-challenge-of-political-engagement-and-national-belonging-in-multicultural-western-cities
Custos Custodum says
Yikes – for those too health-conscious to click on the link, here are random snippets:
Dr Michele Lobo [Cultural Marxist careerist minion – probably did most of the actual writing]
Position Visitor
Research interests: Whiteness … Belonging and Home in White Majority Cultures … Everyday Multiculturalism … and Diversity
Recent books: … Reimagining Citizenship
notmoron says
Simple solution.
Divide all these countries in two
Let leftard go and live with their new jihadis friends
gravenimage says
I don’t want to hand any part of the West over to Muslim savages. They would just use these territories as bases from which to conquer the rest of the West.
Barry says
….this is ass-backward….like everything else revolving/ relating/ involving muslim immigration…it’s the immigrants that should be told about and made clear to them that they must adhere to host country laws and norms. It’s immigrants that should be sensitive towards their hosts, not the other way around…Immigrants must be held accountable for their actions and they must adhere to their hosts’ societal normal and laws….The host nations are the ones who are paying for their very subsistence…..and NOT the host countries being ‘sensitive’ towards the immigrants who bring their ‘norms’…which mostly violate local, national AND universal moral laws…the western world needs to pull its collective head out of its collective ass and turn its collective ass around facing the right direction….
tim gallagher says
A good comment Barry. Except that Muslims won’t ever compromise and adjust to our civilised standards. They’ll obviously lie and lie, telling us they accept our western standards, in order to get into the country, but they are always intent on imposing Islam on all of us. That’s why I say Muslim immigration must be banned from every non-Muslim country. Nothing else can work. Everything you say is right, but, with Islam, with Muslims, it’ll never happen. You’re right about the western worlds needing to wake up. They need to end Muslim migration. Islam is totally incompatible.
PRCS says
“migrant men who physically abuse their wife and children”
Wives.
gravenimage says
All too often this is true.
mgoldberg says
A ‘tolerant’ society that commands itself to tolerate the intolerant, will lose it’s freedom, it’s ability to be tolerant. That ‘diversity’ commands the denouement of principles of freedom, and liberty, by no longer following them, but instead- commanding understanding of all that would otherwise be condemned in it’s own ethical and moral systems, is not a sign of strength, but of weakness and failure.
Without accepting these core rights, of individual freedom, and Liberty, and the attendant responsibility, which are indeed, built upon the ten commandments, there is no real sense of a nation, it’s justice, it’s identity for all.
Diversity is a trap. A utopian guilt trip that ensnares, and liberates none. But those who tell us to feel and understand that which we abhor, and should abhor, are helping to destroy themselves and us.
And they will properly insist upon this, as a right… and they are wrong.
gravenimage says
“Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil”
–Thomas Mann
JMB says
Excellent quote!
But note, we in Australia have repeatedly been told to show respect to Muslims for lots of other things, it seems they are offended by us celebrating Christmas and Easter, having the Union Jack on our national flag, having mixed male/female bathing and much more. They also want us to show respect for Ramadan, observe Friday as a Holy Day as well as incorporate elements of Sharia into our legal system. We have also provided Islamic Prayer Rooms in many public buildings such as hospitals.
As for their demand for us to show respect for wife beating here in Australia, it is getting respect from the loopy left, the same crowd that wants to take any remnant of Christianity out of public life here in Australia. What a massive double standard. But by and large I think wife beating and terror links are fast turning most Aussies away from having any time for Islam in this country.
TassieR says
I guess the next thing on the leftist destructive agenda (be it for Europe, for my Australia or for the States) would be an export of poor dear cannibals. Must we prepare ourselves for being sensitive to their traditional culture of devouring human meat?
gravenimage says
Thanks, JMB.
And yes, I think more people in Australia and the rest of the West are starting–slowly–to wake up to the ugliness of Islam.
Ashley says
OT: Check the news.
Ramadan in Mali. 🙁
gravenimage says
Awful, Ashley:
“Mali resort hit by terror attack, at least 2 people killed”
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/18/mali-resort-hit-by-terror-attack-un-official-says.html
“Ramadan Mubarak!” from pious Muslims…
Guest says
What the hell is wrong with these people?!?
John A. Marre says
I don’t care if they beat their 4 wives. I care about this being used as a way of getting us to accept their barbarian practices, and to pave the way for Sharia.
rich says
All these surveys are really saying is that a great deal of our population are afraid of Muslims and will give them whatever they want. We can cloak it in fancy language and buzz words all we want, but the bottom line is still the same. Calling it “tolerance” and “sensitivity” doesn’t change the outcome. The safety of women will be the first thing sacrificed as the population shifts.
gravenimage says
Australia: Taxpayer-funded study urges “sensitivity” to Muslim migrants who beat their wives
………………………………
Any sensitivity for the women and children who are victims of these Muslims? It appears not. Kudos to Michaelia Cash for standing up for civilized Western values when others in the Australian government are enabling Muslim savagery.
somehistory says
*it’s cultural*…and all others in society need to be “sensitive” and sit by without reporting, condemning, prosecuting…
While in Israel, it is the fault of Israel when moslums beat their wives.
The “culture” and need for everyone to be “sensitive” plants the tombstone to the charge that it is caused by Israel.
jewdog says
I like the exhortation that wife-beaters need to change their ways. There’s only one way for people from such a degenerate culture: The door marked Exit.
PRCS says
Seems those EXIT markings have been painted over in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan…..
Kay says
Amazing that the study didn’t conclude something like:
Unless male immigrants can accept western norms against familial violence, they will not be able to integrate into society. Further immigration should be stopped to see if integration of current immigrants will be possible. And then should only be resumed if immigrants are able to make the cultural adjustments necessary.
Lydia says
It is a sin. There is no room for any ‘appreciation for ethnic or cultural diversity’ in that.
Stan Lee says
To he– with the national sport of Islam! The only sensitivity Australia should have concerning wife beating is for Christians it would be a crime bringing a prison sentence. In a nation where “wife beating” is a crime, it should apply to all males who disregard the laws that apply to beating a wife, with no flexibility towards the perpetrator. Any people who decide for a life in a non-Muslim, therefore non-shariah country must heed the laws that protect women from marital violence. And, Islam seems to be the only agenda seeking special dispensation, because in Islam, “wife beating” has more of a possibility of taking place than not.
There should be no exceptions for Muslims living in free countries, the law of the land must apply to all in that land. It is difficult to believe that Australians would ever accept any leniency towards wife beaters,and medical centers should report such beatings immediately to authorities.
“Spare the penalty and that’s a signal for more of the same offense!”
Sarah says
“hardline political group Hizb ut-Tahrir “.
They are, without a doubt, nothing more or less, than a terrorist organization. Yet our weak, pathetic Prime Minister, the backstabbing, cheating, lying, Goldman Sachs loving Malcolm Turnbull STILL has not labelled them as such.
Turnbull and EVERY other politician from both sides in both the major parties need to quickly prove with empirical evidence, just what good, Hizb ut-Tahrir have bought to Australia to show as their justification for NOT labeling this scum grouping of worthless animals, as terrorists and as a terrorist organization.
Australia’s current political mess is a first class example of what happens when you have a Conservative party in charge at the helm, with a Leader who is essentially, a Lefty. The only things that have stopped Turnbull from being a Labor politician, come down to his personal conflict of loving Lefty identity politics, but being a multi-millionaire who cannot stomach welfare, socialized healthcare and especially, industrial relations laws that may benefit the plebs he makes money off, but inconvenience him greatly, as a capitalist. He’s a bundle of contradictions. He sits above us worthless worker drones as our superior – but he loves his identity politics.
This is what would have happened if Hilary Clinton got into power in the US. There’s a woman who is a Conservative at heart, whilst playing to the identity politics of the Left.
marie cameron says
Sarah. Well said. Further I was shocked to read our government donated about $88 billion
to the Clinton Foundation’ no wonder our politicians were in shock that Clinton lost and our
pathetic MSM went into meltdown with all their fake jabs at Trump.
I believe Trump’s presidency nothing short of a miracle. MAGA
Westman says
The whole idea is so absurd that a stand-up comedian could use this post’s headline, unchanged, for a joke.
PRCS says
No doubt.
gravenimage says
Yes–this sh*t is impossible to lampoon.
Bronson says
At the same time Australian TV news reports express outrage at the rising rate of domestic violence.
Jaladhi says
It’s pointless now – but the fact is Muslims should never have been allowed to migrate to non-Muslim lands. Their migration is just the invasions of seventh century onwards which has now taken the foem of migration, refugee migration,etc,etc,. Whatever they call it – plain and simple it is Muslim invasion that is continuing since the seventh century. The West has simply chosen not to see the real motives of Muslims – willful blindness leading to self destruction!
Islam the religion of killers says
In New Zealand, a Pakastani muslim BEAT HIS WIFE WITH A HAMMER, his taxpayer funded lawyer convinced the court, it would be dangerous to send the taxpayer supported bludger and his two wives and 21 children back to pakistan as pakistan is far to violent.
Arguing the family would be in danger ….
PRCS says
Well, that part is screwed up.
Was he at least convicted of the crime?
Did he receive judicial punishment?
marie cameron says
NZ is actually worse off than Australians! Their MSM is spitting out fake news…the country
is socialist!
SB says
What sick spineless worms these muslin things (not men) are toward those who are smaller, weaker, and voiceless.
Kasey says
Not only that, if you have ever wondered why Islamics do crazy things all the time, this could be why coupled to lethal Islamic ideology.?
1400 Years of Inbreeding:
Something to think about doing something!
Image result for inbreeding pics
Will it help our world understand what is happening?
Probably Not!
Especially when you look towards Canberra
There is one town in Saudi Arabia where there are only TWO last names listed for all its citizens.
We asked several Muslims in Saudi Arabia why they marry their first cousins. All of them told us it’s to keep the wealth within the family and that the Prophet allows them to do this.
This came to from a Lockheed employee who has had 3 assignments to Saudi Arabia. Worth the read!
“During the pilot transition program with the KV-107 and C-130 with Lockheed, we found that most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moonlit nights. Their training retention rate was minimal including maintenance personnel.
Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. An American, British or any other western instructor is burned out pretty quick. It actually took Muslim C-130 pilots years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city. Ask any Marine, Air Force or Army guy who’s been trying to train Iraqis, and especially Afghans.
Islam is not only a religion; it’s a way of life all the way around. Yet another set of revealing facts about Muslim beliefs and traditions and ways of life. 1400 years of inbreeding. I found this to be interesting. Didn’t know whether to believe it or not. To research I went to Wikipedia, “Cousin Marriage”, and far down in the article “Genetics” it seems there is a lot of truth here”.
“A huge Muslim problem: Inbreeding.”
Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first cousins.
This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world. This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%. The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.
The risks of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher, and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.
Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. (Similar effects were seen in the Paranoiac dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)
In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish Army. Sennels says, “The ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.” He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.
In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book. Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.” Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.” According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research measured by articles per million inhabitants.
In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of schoolchildren with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system.
The immigrant dropout rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of patients in Denmark ‘s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background. The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”
Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.
Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Judeo-Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.
Let us hope the civilised West and the North Americans wake up,
before a blind naiveté about the reality of Islam
destroys what remains of our Judeo-Christian culture
and our domestic tranquillity!
Image result for inbreeding pics
They just can’t work it out for themselves ….!
image003.jpg (30 KB, image/jpeg)
image003.jpgimage/jpeg30 KB
image004.jpg (9 KB, image/jpeg)
image004.jpgimage/jpeg9 KB
—
New Outlook Express and Windows Live Mail replacement – get it here:
http://www.oeclassic.com/
image003.jpg (30 KB, image/pjpeg)
image003.jpgimage/pjpeg30 KB
image004.jpg (9 KB, image/pjpeg)
image004.jpgimage/pjpeg9 KB
gravenimage says
Kasey, inbreeding sure as hell does not help.
But converts from Islam can be intelligent and decent people, whereas converts to Islam are just as violent and barbaric.
The main issue is the vile creed of Islam.
Matthieu Baudin says
Typical of the studies one finds that automatically accepts Radical Multicultural ideas of acceptance of all alternative cultural norms and then precedes to devalue or ditch any mainstream social norms that get in the way. Reducing the incidence and severity of wife beating, child beating and also husband beating (yes, this is a significant problem too) is a laudable goal and pandering to violent imported social traditions will only muddy the waters and make this scourge more difficult to tackle.
davej says
All true, unfortunately.
Those who call themselves the best of people are actually the worst of people, sadistic murderers of children and other innocents.
“Cultural norms” should not extend to murder and beatings.
Stupid treasonous governments.
God I hate those that excuse barbarian practises by any “culture”.
Emphasis on the “cult”.
Peacemaker says
The greatest Taxpayer-funded study in Australia.
Tom says
As a male I am repulsed that any study, notwithstanding a publically funded one that took 3 years to complete, would suggest that the feelings of a bully and abuser take precedent over the safety and health of women and children in such an abusers control.
Where is our common sense? Abusive men just propagate the abuse into their male children which means it goes on and on for generations.
We in the west have laws that prohibit abuse in relationships, these laws are built on many years of hard work by womens groups and their supporters, where is the outcry from these groups at this report ?
If integration is too difficult for some, then perhaps western society isn’t for them and they need to return to a country that supports their abuse.
But they will have to give up all the free health care, social welfare etc etc.
gravenimage says
+1, Tom.
Mike says
Imagine if a study stated that ‘sensitivity” must be shown towards hooligans who beat up random Muslims?
This is just as outrageous as the above would be.
Carolyne says
In other words, women and children have no “Human rights,” and we must only be sensitive to the men who beat them?” “Honor Killing,” too, is an Islamic religious tenet so does that mean that Australians must be sensitive to those who kill, too?
gravenimage says
So it seems. Sympathy for the devil…
marie cameron says
I am nauseated by our muslim apologist government.
What next…child brides…FGM. Are we already?
Ric says
Once again the nutters are running the proverbial asylum. I am reiterating the words of most on this forum but it is not the infidels in need of sensitivity training, it is the True-Believers of Islam. Muslim misogynists, wife beaters, murderers, those deeming Female Genitalia Mutilation is lawfully acceptable, the mass-murder via terror of those diverse of this Religion of Intolerance and butchery. The placaters, apologists, especially within the leadership of Western Democracies. The latter bent on denying their citizens a voice of dissent or choice. Indoctrinating students, and the gullible into a leftist progressive diktat that we, the infidels, must assimilate to Islam, not the other way around.
I am sure a myriad of Aussies are not amused with this leftist purging of common sense, turning the villains into the good guys and vice versa for the bona fide good guys. Pathetic, the Caliphate is not far from completion with this weak-kneed and gutless edict.
marie cameron says
We must all speak out and condemn our leaders for their treasonous act against their citizens,
fight for ‘Freedom Of Speech’. We must not fail as Canada has!
Vote our evil politicians out of their ivory towers…
Stop our tax dollars from being squandered to pay for all these scandalous muslim loving surveys.
Valkyrie Ziege says
; What is next? Cultural sensitivity training to accept Jack-the-Ripper?