“Another witness, a detective who was at the deadly crime scene, said at the trial that the man had told her that ‘if a woman cheats, then a man has the right to kill her.’ This is his right in Chechnya and also in the Koran.”
Rachid is wrong, but only partly. The death penalty for adultery is not in the Qur’an. However, it is in Islamic law. And the caliph Umar, one of Muhammad’s closest companions, even maintained that it was originally in the Qur’an:
‘Umar said, “I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, “We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book,” and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajam be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession.” Sufyan added, “I have memorized this narration in this way.” ‘Umar added, “Surely Allah’s Apostle carried out the penalty of Rajam, and so did we after him.” (Bukhari, vol. 8, bk. 82, no. 816)
“Allah’s Apostle” is, of course, Muhammad, who did indeed carry out stonings. Here is the hadith in which he challenges the rabbis about stoning, and in which there is amidst the barbarism and brutality a final act of love and compassion:
The Jews came to Allah’s Apostle and told him that a man and a woman from amongst them had committed illegal sexual intercourse. Allah’s Apostle said to them, “What do you find in the Torah (old Testament) about the legal punishment of Ar-Rajm (stoning)?” They replied, (But) we announce their crime and lash them.” Abdullah bin Salam said, “You are telling a lie; Torah contains the order of Rajm.” They brought and opened the Torah and one of them solaced his hand on the Verse of Rajm and read the verses preceding and following it. Abdullah bin Salam said to him, “Lift your hand.” When he lifted his hand, the Verse of Rajm was written there. They said, “Muhammad has told the truth; the Torah has the Verse of Rajm. The Prophet then gave the order that both of them should be stoned to death. (‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar said, “I saw the man leaning over the woman to shelter her from the stones.” (Bukhari, vol. 4, bk. 56, no. 829)
Even the monkeys practiced stoning, according to another hadith:
During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them. (Bukhari, vol. 5, bk. 58, no. 188)
Muhammad’s example is, of course, normative for Islamic behavior, since “verily in the messenger of Allah ye have a good example for him who looketh unto Allah and the Last Day, and remembereth Allah much” (Qur’an 33:21).
“19 stab wounds, thrown out the window, throat cut,” translated from “19 Messerstiche, aus dem Fenster geworfen, Kehle durchgeschnitten,” Welt, June 13, 2017:
For alleged infidelity, a man stabbed the mother of his five children, threw her out of the window, and then cut her throat. The court ruled against the maximum penalty. For a reason.
In the trial for a deadly marital dispute, the Cottbus regional court condemned the accused to 13 years in prison, as the “Lausitzer Rundschau” reported online.
The 32-year-old Rashid D. had previously admitted that he had stabbed his wife in November 2016 after an argument about alleged infidelity. According to the autopsy report, he stabbed the woman 19 times in their common apartment in Senftenberg (Brandenburg), and injured the then 27-year-old so severely that she had already died from her injuries.
D. also pushed his wife out of the second floor bathroom window. She struck an iron bicycle rack and lay there, as the newspaper also reported. A visitor who happened to be present in the house, who later testified in the trial, had to watch at the front door as the husband went down and cut his wife’s throat four times….
Another witness, a detective who was at the deadly crime scene, said at the trial that the man had told her that “if a woman cheats, then a man has the right to kill her.” This is his right in Chechnya and also in the Koran….
gravenimage says
Germany: Muslim murders wife, says Qur’an gives a man right to kill a woman who cheats
…………………………..
He is (essentially) correct. Now let’s hope Germany does not accept this savagery as a legal defense.
Ramsin says
Europeans? I don’t think this new generation of Europeans even feel the heat. They are in sleep, a heavy one.
newUser says
It is Eurabia already.
Virginia says
I can testify to that. Germany is done.
Lexa456 says
It already HAS been! The Judge sentenced him to 13 years imprisonment for manslaughter, not murder, which makes a big difference in punishment. The Judge has taken into account not only his “Religion”, but also origin and the fact that he and his wife only recently lived in Germany and he could not know that his actions are morally reprehensible and legally forbidden in Germany. No kidding. This is the official justification for the judgment.
Greetings from La-La-Land (aka Germany)
gravenimage says
Thanks for the information, Lexa. What madness.
utis says
If the court buys this, they’re crazier than he obviously is. Remember this incident, American women. If sharia comes here, you will either be slaves or muslim wives. You will have no right to trial, with examination of the evidence. Whether your murdered or divorced, will be your husband’s whim. Fight for you children’s rights, if you don’t care about your own.
AmyB says
I would fight till the bloody end before becoming a slave or Muslim wife.
berserker says
To quote the great intellectual and snowboarder, Trudeau: we have to move beyond tolerance to acceptance.
Let the man go; we should not judge his culture. Germany should make the necessary changes to its laws.
Allahu Snackbar!
somehistory says
The court refused to give him what they could have given him…the maximum…”For a
Reason”…What “reason”? Whatever made them decide that is ***UNreasonable*** in the extreme.
Killing her was not enough….he wanted to kill her over and over…19 stabbings…probably every one of them lethal…threw out out the window to land on a metal bike rack…which could have caused death….and cut her throat four times.
Demonic behavior and he gets 13 years. He is deserving of death.
How old is her oldest child? 20 years? She was 27 and had five children already.
WPM says
He most likely has three other wives and at least ten other kids. I like how he had people watch his kids while he went down the stairs to cut up the dead body in the street. Alot of witnesses all good Moslems ? did nothing to stop him. This is the new normal in the West makes Charlie Manson look like a gentlemen.
somehistory says
He may have had 3 other wives, but the report said, “a man stabbed the mother of his five children”
And it is despicable that people are so willing to watch him cut up her body after having committed the murder. These monsters don’t qualify as human, but as children of the demons. Like those in the Book of Genesis.
Monty says
Living with Islam is like living with a tiger. Poking the tiger with a sharp stick is likely to turn you into lunch. The poking does not create the tiger. it simply reveals its true nature. Europe has yet to see true Islam because the authorities will not provoke it. So it takes more and more control until it will dominate Europe completely. The alternative of course is to remove the tiger. I suspect that it is way too late for that. Our only hope is that at least some part of the world will come to its senses and treat Islam as it is in reality instead how people would like it to be.
gravenimage says
Good analogy.
Musalmaanmasala says
What a difference between “The one who is without sin cast the first stone” – Jesus
and the “prophet” of hate Mohammed
gravenimage says
So true.
RodSerling says
“Rachid is wrong, but only partly. The death penalty for adultery is not in the Qur’an.”
This falls under the category of “honor” killings, for which Islamic law either reduces or waives the punishment. In Islam, this man could have made any number of excuses to “justify” killing his wife, from blasphemy, to apostasy, “witchcraft,” and so on, to get himself off the hook.
The Qur’an 17:32-33 says: “And do not approach unlawful sexual intercourse. Indeed, it is ever an immorality and is evil as a way. And do not kill the soul which Allah has forbidden, except by right. And whoever is killed unjustly – We have given his heir authority, but let him not exceed limits in [the matter of] taking life. Indeed, he has been supported [by the law].”
Whether or not she was killed “unjustly” (according to Islam) depends on the contents of this Muslim’s conversation with his wife. If she admitted adultery, that would be a confession, and in sharia when there is a confession of zina there is no need for four witnesses. His only crime according to Islamic law then would be to have usurped the authority of judge or ruler by taking the law into his own hands. (His excuse in Germany could be that there is no Islamic ruler). That vigilantism may be subject to a discretionary punishment (if any) from the judge and, in an Islamic culture, probably dealt with as an honor killing. (On the other hand, Islam actually encourages vigilantism through “commanding the right and forbidding the wrong.”
Also, Muhammad said, “A man will not be asked why he beat his wife.” In other words, he can’t be held accountable under Islamic law for what he does to his wife. In Islam, the husband is the Caliph over his wife, children, and household.
The specifics of the Qur’an, Sunnah, and Islamic law are important in that they help guide us in predicting Muslim behavior and long-term trends viz. Islamization. It’s also important to recognize that, whether or not these individuals are following the letter of sharia exactly, they have dangerous beliefs that are too often accompanied by harmful and destructive actions, and immigration of Muslims from such countries needs to be halted.
These observations are common sense. But our authorities are acting in a manner that is criminally negligent (if not treasonous in some cases, e.g., Merkel, Trudeau, Hollande/Macron, Lofven). They need to be replaced by sane individuals who value human life over political correctness.
Patricia F Koenig says
Well said!
carol says
They don’t give a damn about political correctness. Is it PC to mistreat your own people and make it evident you really consider them slaves and tools to be herded and socially engineered? Seems we need to add draconian stipulations to this politically INcorrect agenda we’ve had inflicted upon us.
Knowing what I now do about this “religion”, I particularly despise seeing the flowing black robes and large bright white turbans of their “holy” men trotting around on our streets. The world knows Islamic history so what’s the excuse for this? What do they say? – tragedy committed twice becomes farce.
No Fear says
Stoned? I smoked the Quran and I didn’t get stoned.
Jack says
More Merkel Mania
mach37 says
Muslims must follow the law of the country they are in. Does German law, or any other non-Muslim nation, allow Muslims to not be punished for breaking the nation’s laws? I suppose a nation’s law could be amended to permit Muslims to escape punishment, but I can foresee a lot of criminals claiming to have just converted to Islam to avoid punishment for certain crimes.
John A. Marre says
How long before Germany gives its new guest-welfare-recipients the full right to follow Sharia, including the right to kill a wife?
Troybeam says
For a Muslim all it takes is a whispered word or thought that a woman has cheated, there is no proof, no witnesses, nothing but a whisper or thought to send a Muslim man into a rage, due to the words by Mohmmed men in Islam are killing their wives, sisters, aunts etc. The men think they can get away with murder because Mohammed says thats what they must do, it is legal and considered fair under Islam and sharia law,
What is difficult about this issue: Judges side with sharia and ignore the laws of their nation giving sharia law another foot hold in the nation to destroy the nation.
gravenimage says
True–all a Muslims has to do is “fear” disobedience from his wife to beat or kill her.
St. Manuel II Palaiologos says
In the Hadith: “It is not permissible to shed the blood of a Muslim who bears witness that there is no god but Allaah and that I am the Messenger of Allaah except in three cases: a life for a life (murder), zina of one of who is previously-married (adultery), and the one who changes his religion and forsakes the jamaa’ah.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (6370) and Muslim (3175)
Not in the Qur’an, but clearly in the Hadith.
gravenimage says
True–and *very few* Muslims reject the Hadith.
Terry says
Time served.
Valkyrie Ziege says
; Welcome back to the bronze-age.