“For many years this march has been rife with anti-Semitism and the fulsome support of a terrorist organisation – Hezbollah. I am sure I do not need to remind anyone that Hezbollah is currently massacring Syrian civilians on behalf of President Assad and is funded by Iran – one of the major supporters of global terrorism in the world today. For all that, our correspondence on the matter with Mr. Khan receives only generic responses from his staff and nothing from Mr. Khan himself.”
That’s telling. Nor is it the first time Khan has moved in a Sharia direction.
“London Mayor Khan Slammed by Jewish Groups Over Refusal to Ban Anti-Israel Al-Quds March,” by Simon Kent, Breitbart, June 16, 2017:
London’s Mayor Sadiq Khan has been slammed by members of the capital’s Jewish community over his refusal to ban Sunday’s anti-Israel al-Quds Day march and its traditional display of flags supporting the Hezbollah terrorist organization.
Raphi Bloom, chairman of North West Friends of Israel group, told Breitbart News that despite repeated lobbying of Mr. Khan and a petition supported by almost 20,000 signatures calling for the event to be cancelled, the city’s leader has remained steadfast in his refusal to intervene.
“Hezbollah is a proscribed terrorist organisation. It makes NO distinction between its armed and political wing, yet its supporters will be allowed to march through London’s streets unhindered,” Mr. Bloom said. “This is extremely disappointing and challenges the mayor’s commitment to rid the streets of London of extremism.
“For many years this march has been rife with anti-Semitism and the fulsome support of a terrorist organisation – Hezbollah. I am sure I do not need to remind anyone that Hezbollah is currently massacring Syrian civilians on behalf of President Assad and is funded by Iran – one of the major supporters of global terrorism in the world today.
“For all that, our correspondence on the matter with Mr. Khan receives only generic responses from his staff and nothing from Mr. Khan himself. He may not have the power to ban al-Quds outright but he can lobby and make direct representations to the Metropolitan Police on behalf of a concerned London Jewish community.”
As Breitbart Jerusalem reported, Al Quds Day was begun by the late Ayatollah Khomeini to call for Israel to be destroyed. Organisers claim it “unites for the freedom of the oppressed in Palestine and beyond” and it is co-run by the Islamic Human Rights Commissionis to coincide with the end of Ramadan.
Hezbollah is an illegal, anti-Semitic terrorist organisation and its flags are flown on the day to honour the terrorist group sworn to the destruction of the Jewish state. The group is designated as a terror organization in its entirety by the Arab League, Bahrain, Canada, France, Israel, the Netherlands, and the United States.
Mr. Bloom accepts that people can freely march against the State of Israel in a democracy. He also believes open support for a terror group should have no place in society….
mortimer says
Sadistic Conman is the head Fifth Columnist of and Chief Advocate-Defender of the Terrorists in UK.
Surprised, anyone? WHY IN HELL DID YOU VOTE FOR HIM?
James says
Ask those Londoners who voted for him, why they did so. A lot of Londoners did not. And no-one except Londoners did so.
Bob says
Look at the population of east London and see the voters who put him where he is now – very few native British among them!
Paul says
My recollection is that Khan is a smooth politician and successfully positioned himself as a moderate. So give credit where credit is due. He earned the votes of a diverse population, including many Jewish voters, who fell for his sweet facade.
Jayell says
He didn’t ‘earn the votes of a diverse population’. He got enough votes from CERTAIN SECTIONS of a ‘diverse population’ to whom he could (for various reasons) be guaranteed to appeal against the split votes of a large number who certainly did NOT want him. I sincerely hope that so many Londoners are not so stupid as to be conned by any ‘sweet talk’ from any politician, least of all a Labour one after the experience of Blair.
old white guy says
does anyone one have any doubts just who and what the mayor is?
william says
This is gun control.. He should’ve been neutralized long ago
Eddie says
I would say it was the Islamic vote that got him elected, as are all the other Islamic Mayors around Great Britain at least 10 or twelve (The Islamic Vote) remember local elections are not compulsory therefore the onus is on inaction by citizens not lodging a valid vote.
balam says
Just as the Americans put a Muslim Hussein OBAMA n the White House As you sow ,so shall you reap!!!
mortimer says
The organizers of the Al Quds genocide day celebration are members of terrorist front groups.
miriamrove says
Look at his first and last name. There is no surprise here. m
David Scoltock says
You are a bit of an idiot. The vast majority of Asians (Indian/Pakistani in American terms) with the last name “Khan” are Sikh.
It’s rather unusual for a muslim to be a “khan” to be honest.
miriamrove says
There is no reason for you to be offensive. Khan is the most popular Pakistani name out there. before calling someone an idiot do some home work. It seems you know J..S about Islam and or Sikhs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikh_names
I was borh and raised a muslim and I know who the hell is a Muslim. That said I will not call you a name. I will call you an uneducated American. m
Salome says
Sikhs are called Singh if they are male or Kaur if they are female. ‘Khan’ means ‘Ruler’ and is a common Muslim name in south Asia.
Deepak says
Khan= muslim singh = sikh I have yet to meet a Khan that is not a muslim.. BTW are you new to Taqqiya?
gravenimage says
And I don’t think I’ve ever seen a non-Muslim named Sadiq.
balam says
‘Sadiq’ was the nick name of Mohammad for being absolutely ‘TRUTHFUL’. The facts were just the opposite!!!
Shalom says
It isn’t only like that in the east end, it stretches right out to the outer London suburbs, I recently left NW London to live on the coast – strict Islamic dress is everywhere you look. I just couldn’t stand it anymore.
Anti Semitic attacks in this area are rising phenomenally.
Where I live now is like a breath of fresh air, just like when I was growing up.
Shalom says
Tzadik is the Hebrew word for a very learned scholar. I’m sure it must derive from that. You also see a lot of Muslims called Hashem which is the word we use to describe God. Otherwise, during prayer we refer to him as Adonai.
Anonymous says
>> The vast majority of Asians (Indian/Pakistani in American terms) with the last name “Khan”
>> are Sikh.
>>
>> It’s rather unusual for a muslim to be a “khan” to be honest.
I live in a large, cosmopolitan city in India and I have never come across a Sikh or for that matter any non-muslim with the last name “Khan”. While there might be anecdotal exceptional cases, within India at least, the last name Khan is associated with muslims.
Janice Disher says
Muslims took the name from Ghengis Khan when they tried to infiltrate his government and usurp his authority – Khan meaning ruler.
Laura says
No it isn’t, it’s a typical pakistani name.
Phil Copson says
“…No it isn’t, it’s a typical pakistani name…”
Laura – are you getting confused between religion and nationality ? Pakistan is 97% per cent muslim, therefore any name that is typical of Pakistan is also going to be typically muslim.
You might as well say that Bert, Sid, and Fred can’t be Christian names because they’re English names.
balam says
Name means nothing. It is the VENOM of ISLAM which clouds the Muslim mind .Sadly ,a Muslim would always be PREJUDICED against Non-Muslim .If a Muslim allows his daughter or sister to be married to a Non Muslim ,then he is not prejudiced.
balam says
Sadly, but you are wrong .The Sikhs are never named Khan ,for your information.
salim says
Khan is a typical Muslim Pakistani name derived from Genghis Khan. I read somewhere that it is estimated that 10% of humans in that region descended from the tyrant leader(!).
As the Pakistani language is based on Arabic, it is funny to note that that the word khan in Arabic actually means a person who have been a TRAITOR, which suits the mayor of London well.
notmoron says
What British eat. They are walking dead with rotten brain
marina says
What made the Brits elect a Mudslime mayor !! Of course he won’t ban it.
Bob says
See my reply above!
abad says
Khan needs to be voted out of office then deported to Syria.
The UK is not the best place for Moslems to be.
Terry says
Abad-I disagree–The UK is a GREAT place for Muslims to be (not so great for the British).
The mayor of London is a Muslim; Muslims run over and stab people and the police chief is smiling talking about how cosmopolitan London is- the diversity of those murdered. A Muslim murders people at 9well, after) a concert and the limeys have no idea why he did it.
And before that, the other driver who ran over people.
And the British have no clue; but allow terrorists and those who spew genocide into the country, but ban Geller, Michael Savage and Mr. Spencer.
It is great to be a Muslim in Britain- free everything, and no responsibility.
abad says
I know you wrote that tongue in cheek, the problem is the UK has been too soft for too long – their leaders need to get backbone and start shipping out the enemy to a nation more conducive to them.
Like Syria.
Anne Smith says
Unfortunately back bone is the last thing our politicians have got. All they care about is keeping their overpaid jobs and hanging on like grim death to what little power they can seize.
Teresa May has now been shown to be Blunderwoman in every way.
A useless Home Secretary under whose watch the immigration rates rose to unprecedented levels, the Sharia Courts quadrupled in number and who rushed off to pay court to Saudi Arabia (wearing a headscarf) the minute she became PM.
Yesterday she was chased out of a meeting in Kensington by a Muslim mob and fled for her life back to Downing Street.
Backbone? Pah!!!!
notmoron says
What the British eat. They are walking dead with rotten brain.
Ace-of-Clubs says
Khan was voted in because London is full of do-gooder PC lefties and a huge number of Muslims and other non-whites who tend to vote Labour. It is appalling that our capital city has a Muslim mayor, but not surprising given the demographics. You pass through London these days and feel a foreigner in your own country. Khan would be sending the police out to harrass any anti-Muslim terrorism protesters and yet he is happy to let this so-called march go ahead. No wonder so many Jews are leaving Europe. It is disgraceful but sadly the country is awash with jihadists and a brainless younger part of the population who have been brainwashed at school and college.
Phil Copson says
“…You pass through London these days and feel a foreigner in your own country….”
Dead right; as a salesman, London was part of my patch and I have a really distinct memory of driving through Southall one sunny afternoon and realising that there were no white faces to be seen amongst all the thousands out and about whether on foot or driving. Not a single one on the way through, and just three on the way back.
To reach central London, I’d sometimes cut from the North Circular through Harlesden and along the Harrow Road, and on one occasion I had a passenger who felt so threatened by the general run-down atmosphere of scruffy shops, litter-strewn road, lounging locals, and the absence of any white population along High Street in Harlesden, he requested that we return by a different route.
Regardless of race, religion or ideology, it is simply plain wrong for the indigenous population of any country to be pushed out of entire areas and to become a minority in their own towns and cities.
Politicians are playing God with the world’s population, and too few care about the consequences.
doom says
London is already doom. Only 55% of the population are white. UK is not that big and soon is going to be filled with muslims. Then the clash of cultures with happen, but, Will we win?
somehistory says
Look at his moslum eyes and see right into his dark heart and soul. This decision is not a surprise to any who are aware of what islum is all about.
Pong says
I wander if has ever been a demonstration in London or any place in UK supporting Israel.
Europe in general and UK in particular are getting close to what Israel has been fighting for many years – islamic terrorism. The only difference is that Israel will never be islamised, unlike UK and most of Europe. In 10-20 years UK will be run by sharia. Indigenous brits will be forced to convert or become dimmis. The only benefit for majority of brits will be jewish free britan. For them it is a worthy exchange for becoming second rate people. Good luck to you. It isn’t 1940, the jews have the country to go to. There will not be another holocaust. With 300 nuclear weapons, sofisticated delivery systems and nuclear submarines, Israel is pretty safe. NATO without USA is no match for IDF.
Just spent a few days in Amsterdam. What a city! So much character! With the last election dutch people abandoned their character, history and culture. It is like selling your own daughter to a brothel.
Europe is lost. The only hope is east Europe. Prague is wonderful, no moslems. You talk to people and they say that no pressure from EU will make them to accept moslem invasion. And they look at Israel as a friend and partner.
As for UK, enjoy your pakistany major and look forward to life under sharia.
R Russell says
Search Engine.
BDS Westminster Hall. It gets worse
Tetvet1968 says
I lived in Amsterdam for over three years 92/96. I was working in Yemen and had a choice to fly home or live in Amsterdam I was always amazed at that city. I had relatives in Denmark I would twice a year visit them. I also had friends living on the Canary Islands I also enjoyed the Bulldog Cafe and Canal Street. When I stayed there I lived in the Amsterdam Grand Hotel Krasnapolsky right on Dam Square. It was a short trolley ride to The Bulldog cafe and walking distance to Canal Street. Dante inferno restaurant was a short walk as well Harry’s American Bar was around the corner. I loved Amsterdam, but it’s been a number of years since I’ve been there, but I hear the Islamic-fascist have taken over I saw that in 2005 the last time I was there.
Phil Copson says
“The only benefit for majority of brits will be jewish free britan.”
And why do you say that is a “benefit” exactly ?
Terry says
The reason that a Jew Free Britain would be a ‘ benefit” to Britain is simple.
The British ( the few who are left) will NOT HAVE TO HIDE THEIR -ANTISEMITISM.
With no Jews, they can be open about it.
They just cannot insult Muslims, or they will be killed.
(The British on numerous occasions elected MP and (therefore Prime Ministers- who were not exactly Jew friendly. I beleive it was Lord Atlee who defeated Sir Winston Churchill-AFTER Sir. Winston took and led them through WW2; others; prince Charles-although not a leader, seems to be a whack job- with his pro-Islam stance probably antisemitic. )
.
Phil Copson says
“The reason that a Jew Free Britain would be a ‘ benefit” to Britain is simple.
The British ( the few who are left) will NOT HAVE TO HIDE THEIR -ANTISEMITISM.
With no Jews, they can be open about it……”
——————————————————————————————————–
I suppose that as a piece of logic, that stands up, but equally if there were no Jews in Britain, what reason would there be for anti-semitism in the first place ?
(For instance, I’m really really prejudiced against the Martians, but luckily, I’ve never met one…..)
Actually, I was waiting for Pong to tell us what he/she has against Jews, if anything, but on reflection, I’d rather not know. I’ve never really understood what anti-semitism is based on, I don’t wish to, and I would far rather that the evil genie of anti-semitism had been left safely corked in it’s post WW2 bottle.
Terry says
Phil,
A few weeks ago, the Israeli Ambassador to the UN (Useless Nations) gave a speech. The title of the speech was WHERE ARE THE JEWS.?
He went on (I do NOT recall the numbers, or the year/s cited), or the length of time that there were Jewish communities in these countries, but in some of them over 1,000 years)
In Algeria there were—–( fill in numbers; year; length of time). Now there are none.
In Yemen same as above
In Syria same as above ( although in Syria, as well as Iraq, there were Jewish communities at least 1,000 or more years–in Iraq, I believe for over 2,000 years).
The Ambassador went through the lsit.
THESE COUNTRIES HAVE NO JEWS. BUT THEY ARE STILL ANTISEMITIC.
A BIGOT DOES NOT NEED JEWS AROUND JUST TO HATE THEM, FOR NO REASON.
Phil Copson says
“.Our spineless governments are scared of any muslims rioting in the streets and having to call in the militia to restore order by killing a few of them.They know that would be the beginning of the end.”
———————————————————————————————————————————–
I’d much rather that they’d uphold the law and deal with any riots. Showing that the government are in charge should (obviously) have been the over-riding priority the moment that it became obvious that there was a significant problem with breaches of the law amongst the muslim population. Everybody knows the “first broken window” principle that sets an area on a downward slide, and the same holds true of any form of criminality, ie – “You get as much trouble as you are prepared to tolerate.”
Having a riot or riots, and gaining the upper hand, would crystallise the thought that the rule of law is (A) worth defending, and (B) can be defended, and hopefully would be “the beginning of the beginning” in re-establishing a properly conducted civil society. Here’s hoping…
Terry says
In my reply to your reply to my post- The Ambassador, in his speech had the numbers of Jews, the year and the length of time that there were Jewish communities. I just don’t recall them, except in all cases the answer was none, of a handful.
Phil Copson says
“A few weeks ago, the Israeli Ambassador to the UN (Useless Nations) gave a speech. The title of the speech was WHERE ARE THE JEWS.?….”
Thanks, Terry – I will find and read the text of his speech. I would be interested to see what figures he quotes. In different places I see figures for x thousand or y tens of thousands of Jews having left (read “been driven out of…”) France and Germany, then other people claiming that those figures are false etc etc. Some authoritative figures would illustrate the threat to the Jewish populations caused by muslim immigration.
A few weeks ago I read that Mosul now has no Jewish population, ending this part of the city’s history after 3000 years.
How soon before we can start listing the towns and cities in North Africa, the Middle East, Pakistan, Indonesia, Nigeria etc, that have no Christian population ?
Terry says
Try; ISRAEL TODAY or HONEST REPORTING (I read those almost daily) and am fairly certain that one of them had the story and the numbers. If not, try DRY BONES.
Dry Bones are political cartoons, and often based upon news stories, and the entire article is printed.
John A. Marre says
In you’re going to the UK, go now. You don’t have long. In a few years the UK will be the Islamic Caliphate of Defeated Britons, and you won’t be welcome.
Tetvet1968 says
Another good reason to never go back to the Muslim UK. All my Brit friends live in Spain or in Thailand or the Canary Islands. So, I have good reason to go back to the bloody UK.
Tetvet1968 says
Another good reason to never go back to the Muslim UK. All my Brit friends live in Spain or in Thailand or the Canary Islands. So, I have no good reason to go back to the bloody UK.
Barry says
So I’m just more than a bit confused. It’s a hate crime to criticize Islam for its’ murderous teachings in its’ so called sacred texts…..but it’s not a hate crime to hate and protest against the only democracy in the Middle East???? How did the U.K. Get its head so far up its ass with its laws and priorities…and have a London Muslim mayor? Are you Brits all insane?
Carpediadem says
Look up Euro Arab Dialogue and all be revealed.
Anne Smith says
No we are not insane, but we are outnumbered because the politicians for the last 70 years have encouraged and assisted in every way possible massive immigration from Pakistan and Bangladesh, plus in more recent years huge numbers from the Middle East.
This skewing of the population has resulted in our rulers being drawn from the non indigenous people.
Add to this mix our good manners and tolerance and unwillingness to be unkind to people and you will see that we have been taken advantage of in every possible way.
Sarah says
I wonder – if it were actually honestly studied and statistically researched – just how much benefit can be proven to have been bought to the UK, by allowing in all those men, women and children from Bangladesh and Pakistan?
Yes, I’m sure its easy enough to point out that odd success story, like this idiot, Khan – but what did they truly bring to the UK?
Different takeaway food choices and corner shops and other small businesses where they sell their goods etc are not a net-positive benefit for the UK as a nation and its culture. Anyone can run a small business, their cultural heritage brings nothing to their ownership of a bottleshop, or milk bar or clothing store etc etc.
It would be interesting to see a detailed, thorough study of this, backed up with statistical proof for its claims. Its like the Indians in Australia. 99.99% come here and do the right thing, join in, integrate to some extent and don’t ever cause an issue.
But all they ever ultimately do, is study and then take on employment in jobs that can be and always are, filled by native Australians. Introducing us to curry and other rather tasty cuisine options are great and all – but do not impact any positive change on our nation or culture.
Just what do they bring to the table aside from being able to say ‘well, we fitted in and did much the same as any Aussie’. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have any real issues with the Indian population here,whatsoever – but its a fair example in many respects (just not generally, a religious respect) and it points to a larger issue.
Why has it become a bad thing to expect that those who join in, do so with the intent of their being a positive, tangible, quantifiable benefit for us?
roger woodhouse says
It is quantifiable but never will be because the tesult woyld be too damaging to the leftwing and the villification of all its stood for these past forty or more years.The very existance of the vast majority of muslims in this country are a severe drain on our resources and will never be net contributors.It doesnt need an expert in economics to work it out.Women not eorking .Most earning below taxable incomes or working as self employed and fiddling their incomes to avoid paying tax.All have at least 5 children with the accompanying benefits.All receive free education and health care.Mody live in subsidised housing.so how can they ever claim to be a benefit to the country?
Janeatte says
It’s the londeners fault they should go to his office drag from his ears and throw him in the street
IQ al Rassooli says
Dear Americans, please always remember that as Infidels/ Kuffar/ Non Muslims, you are NOT the only ones targeted for Subjugation to Sharia or EXTERMINATION by Muslims (Arabs or otherwise) hence it is VITAL that you realize that one does not need more than two brain cells of logic to understand Muslims and Islam in a nutshell~
Since every Muslim is Sharia compliant (London mayor Khan is a prime example who made Haj to Mecca and hence Sharia compliant as well as Linda Sarsour who LOVES Sharia) every Muslim cannot ever be a Law abiding LOYAL citizen in ANY non Muslim nation because these nations do not submit to Allah’s Sharia. Hence every Muslim is the mortal and eternal enemy of every non Muslim Infidel/ Kafir on planet Earth (80% of current humanity) who hide their disloyalty by PRETENDING and deceiving (Taqiyyah) non Muslims that they are loyal (such as mayor Khan and the Muslims in congress)
Every Muslim is a potential Mass Murderer the instant he/ she decides that he/she is NOT Sharia compliant enough (just like in the recent Muslim terrorist attacks in UK)
I agree that Not ALL Muslims are Terrorists BUT 100% of Terrorist attacks against Infidels/ Kuffar are committed only by MUSLIMS Every Muslim is therefore a hair trigger Time Bomb primed to go off
Only in the WARPED imagination of leftists can one find Moderate, Militant, Radical or Extremist Muslims because in reality Muslims are Muslims just as Nazis are Nazis and no one ever addressed Nazis as Moderate, Militant, Radical or Extremist
All other explanations are superfluous and redundant It is time for every decent and patriotic person to unshackle yourselves from the pre conceived but erroneous notion that ANYONE who is not a Muslim can make PEACE with Islam.
All anyone in doubt has to do is READ only chapters 2 to 9 of Muhammad’s Quran and watch the repeated mass slaughter of unarmed innocent European, American, Russian, Indian, Chinese, Iraqi etc. civilians by Muslims proclaiming they are doing the butchery to PLEASE their demonic god Allah
As usual, all that Europeans get from their criminally negligent leaders after every Islamic mass murder are platitudes, meaningless expressions of sympathy to the hapless victims by the very leaders who are unwilling to protect their citizenry because of their abject denial of all Facts and Reality regarding the TRUTH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTuFA1fQ-yg&feature=youtu.be&a
IQ al Rassooli
Kafir & Proud!
http://www.alrassooli.com
gravenimage says
London’s Muslim mayor refuses to cancel pro-jihad terror anti-Israel demonstration
…………………..
No surprise here–Khan has been showing his true colors for a long time.
newUser says
He is a jihady himself. Not surprised.
tedh754@gmail.com says
Say hello to sharia. Say goodbye to tourism.
underbed cat says
What is the date of the anti israel protest in London….would Americans be safe there today?
underbed cat says
Mayor K. is doing what every muslim leader in secular countries do…..protect Islam and allow an anti Israel protests to proceed…using it and defining it as a human rights march. A complete reversal of terms. The Quran is teaches muslims that the infidels are the enemy, the infidels are people of the Jewish faith, Christians of all denominations, people of no faith, and even other muslims whom they deem not properly obeying sharia law. So basically all fighting is defined as self defense…although they attack aggressively such as sura 47.4 …”.when you meet the unbelievers strike the neck”….I think that is terrorism…they think a little different…and it is not a race…but a code…that should not carry the title of mayor. Sometimes truth is the strangest thing, so is not allowing British citizens to speak about the problems of the doctrine that has rolled out in the E. U.
Rolf Wittwer says
Could be very violent and dangerous this time.
1’000s of Muslims are angry (once more) and undisciplined about the firetragedy.
Probably many of them will divert their hate towards Nonmuslims by attacking them.
The pot is spoiling…..!
Phil Copson says
“….sort of a Marshal law….”
That’s “Martial Law” as in military, “martial arts” etc, not “Marshal” as in six-guns and stetsons…..
If Martial Law is ever imposed, it will come from the government calling in the army either to control riots or to combat attempts to declare mini-caliphates as is currently happening in The Philippines.
JIMJFOX says
Disagree. Martial Law would be to protect muslims against ‘Islamophobia’.
You can bet your life on that…
Infidel from Down Under says
Have an anti Palestinian March in London tomorrow during Ramadan – then watch the knives come out, the bullets fly and the bombs go off.
It would be all part of the muslim period of ‘Peace and Goodwill’ would it not!! Ha,ha!!!!
Anne Smith says
No one could ever dispute that the fire in the tower was a most appalling and disastrous event which should never have happened. The manner of the deaths was ghastly beyond belief and our hearts go out to all of them and their families.
However it must be asked why so many people from overseas were housed in this building? Why is it the responsibility of the local Council to provide housing for all immigrants who decide to come here? Were they all genuine refugees from war zones or were they economic immigrants ? Why are they all here? Why are they not building up and improving their own countries? Why do we admit so many people who wish to come here, not from war zones or at any form of risk, and then our own taxpayers have to perpetually provide them with life’s necessities?
These are hard and very unpopular questions but the politicians have to grapple with this. That they are, and have been for some time, frightened to do so shows that they really only care about themselves and not the defence of the nation.
Noel says
Anne, you have voiced my feelings perfectly.
Sarah says
God he is just a treasure, isn’t he?
Frankly, his being Mayor tells me a couple of things – and these things only about the state of London.
1. There are far too many Muslims enclaving in London as a city
2. They’re very happy to exercise their choice to vote – when offered a candidate who can sprout whatever he damn well likes – just as long as he’s Muslim.
That’s all there is to it, really. I keep seeing and hearing assurances and boasts from the UK’s leaders about how London is the most cosmopolitan city in the world. The most vibrant. The most exciting.
No. Khan’s appointment tells me that London is infested with Islam. Enough Islam to now sway public votes. That’s about it. And its alarming and its heartbreaking given the rich history that London represents to so many of us who ultimately, descend at some point, from England – which is the vast majority of the White’s in the Western world.
This was once the capital where King’s and Queen’s ruled the nation from. Where William the Conqueror was crowned – ushering in England as we know it, today. The location of where Henry VIII began Reformation – thus forever changing culture for the rest of us – we probably wouldn’t have secularism today – if it wasn’t for Reformation setting the very earliest seeds with the split from Rome. Then there’s Guy Fawkes. There’s the Great Fire – London was the damn birthplace of the Suffragette’s – where would we be today, as the West, without those women?
And for all this rich cultural heritage, for the countless incredible historical events that took place in London, starting all the way back in AD 43, when the Roman’s first built the city – where are we today?
A traitorous Muslim is running the show, voted in by a bunch of people who live in that city, in that nation – who hate it, or at least, could care less about it all and its vital historical importance to the ENTIRE WESTERN WORLD when compared to their beloved religion that slithered up out of some grotty, primitive tents from the sands of pig ignorant, medieval Arabia.
What a tragedy.
roger woodhouse says
Well said.We have about 20 years left to reverse this trend peacefully.After that its civil war with the muslims being booted out
Sarah says
Thanks Roger! – We won’t resolve it. We’ll just pass Go, collect $200 and go straight to civil war.
The Left will want a civil war – because they assume they’ll win it and then can consolidate their ideology and their vision for the West.
Although the Left thinks it has, in its army, the Muslims that the Left works so hard to defend. They’ve got a rude shock coming. Maybe they need an English history lesson. I would introduce them to Lord Thomas Stanley of the Cousins War era. His behaviour back then, is a good indicator of what is going to happen.
The Right will want a civil war too. In order to maintain the West, claw back some of the recent un-savoury changes and crush any future risings from the Islamic world and put to bed, the danger of the modern day Left ideology.
But I think the Right is grossly overestimating who will actually stand to fight with them. Too many of us are corpulent, decadent, raised from birth to be morbidly obese with passivity. Most of us would flee rather than fight. Most of us would cower rather than defy. The West as a culture, has gradually crushed the innate aggression out of its men and women by providing decade upon decade of peace, prosperity, safety and incredibly luxurious living standards.
Those people are the poor buggar’s up for slaughter. And then the Islamic world – they’ll betray the Left, circle around and then fight their own battle for their own aims. (At least Lord Stanley only jumped from one side to the other as it best suited him.)
That’s my prediction. I hope I’m wrong, but I sincerely do not think that I am wrong.
Noel says
Sarah
No, sorry, but Britain is not London. Suffragettes started in Anglesey.
William the Conqueror was a non-English speaking invader who killed the last English king. I agree with most of what you say, though. “cosmopolitan” is another name for ghetto-ridden.
John A. Marre says
What he is doing is making sure that he is going to be elected Grand Prime Minister Imam when the UK becomes fully Islamic.
Jon says
And yet the London police clamp down on any demonstrations against Islamist atrocities. Tommy Robinson and his groups would never be allowed to demonstrate against jihadis. Some incongruity here!
Is it just fear of a Muslim backlash? Have they become that powerful in Britain?
roger woodhouse says
Yes its down to fear.Our spineless governments are scared of any muslims rioting in the streets and having to call in the militia to restore order by killing a few of them.They know that would be the beginning of the end.
James says
In London, maybe, but not in Britain. Britain is 1/9 of the size of California, with a population of c. 65 million. 1/8 of that is concentrated into London, The rest is very unevenly distributed, and the same goes for the Muslim population. London attracts a lot of attention for fairly obvious reasons, but to take what happens there as a reliable guide to what happens in the rest of the United Kingdom would be very misleading. This is as true of social, political and religious attitudes as of anything else.
Robin Rosenblatt says
Enjoy it. Soon all of you will be Islamic slaves to be bought and sold.
Walter Sieruk says
Not to get too much off the specific topic of this article, yet still keeping within the scope of the subject of London and Islam is the very important message.
That Grenfell tower fire in the city of London was a tragic disaster. In all fairness, the jihadist terrorists had no hand in starting that fire, still their god ,Allah, the god of Islam ,as if he really does exist , did start that fire. . For the Quran teaches in Surah 57:22. “No misfortune [disaster] can happen on earth or in your souls but is recorded in a decree [Quran ] before [in eternity ] We [Allah] bring it into existence: that is easy for Allah.” Therefore according the Islam’s “holy book,” the Quran the Islamic god, Allah, is guilty and the one to blame for the awful fire in which at fifty eight people died and many more are harmed in that catastrophe. What a cruel vicious, malicious god Allah must be. So Allah is than a very unloving malice –filled god.
The God of the Bible is not really Allah the god of Islam. To explain, through the passing of time it has become widely accepted that the word “Allah” is just the Arabic word for God. This started when truth compromising Bible “translators” substituted the word Allah where the word God should have had been uses in the Arabic translation of the Bible. Furthermore, in the glossary in the book ASSASSINS! By Dr. Haha Lung it defines Allah as the “Pre-Islamic Lunar god : the god of Islam. “ Likewise, in the book entitled INSIDE ISLAM by a former Muslim who is now a Christian, Reza F. Safa on pages 22, 23 it reads “In pre-Islamic times both Allah –worship and Baal-worship involved the worship of the sun, the moon and the stars which h defines them as astral religions. [Which are condemned in the Bible, Second Kings 23:5] The crescent moon, which was the symbol of moon worship, is also the symbol of Islam.” In conclusion the Islamic god, Allah, is not the God of the Bible.
The words in brackets are my own. In addition other some other books that expose this little known truths are WHO IS THIS ALLAH ? by G..J.O.. Moshay also UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet Caner and Emir Fethi Caner and THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey . There is also PHILISTINE by Ramon Bennett and ANSWERING JIHAD by Mabeel Qureshi
Furthermore, in the Bible it gives the account of the Prophet Elijah declared “If the Lord is God, follow Him; but if Baal be ,then follow him.” First Kings 18:21.[N.K.J.V.] In other words follow one of the other. Not both.
Moreover, many people say that the God of the Bible and the god of Islam are one the same. Is the majority always right? That’s not always the case. As an example the Christian pastor and scholar, Michael Youssef, who is also an Arab in his book entitled JESUS, JIHAD AND PEACE on page 69 informs the reader that “The name Allah comes from pre-Islamic times, and it corresponds to the Babylonian mane Bel or Baal. According to the Middle East scholar E.M. Wherry, pre-Islamic Arabs worshiped gods they called Allah. Both pre-Islamic Allah-worship and Baal –worship involved worship of the sun, the moon and the stars, which is why they are called astral religions. The crescent moon, the symbol of pagan moon worship, is also the symbol of Islam. It is printed on flags of many Islamic countries and placed atop minarets and mosques.” Likewise, a former Muslim who is now a Christian, Dr. Daniel Shayesteh, who used to live in the Middle East but now he lives in America . In his book ISLAM AND THE SON OF GOD. On pages 7,8. Reads “Allah is the generic term for God in many Middle –Eastern cultures. Allah is identified as one of the 360 or so idols worshiped by the Arabian people for centuries before Muhammad was born. Many do not know that Allah was the good god of the Arabians. This explains the crescent moon found on minarets and mosques and the flags of Muslim nations. .. .Historic writings also identify Allah with Baal.” It’s also worth mentioning that the Bible condemns such astral religions. As in, for example, Second Kings 23:5.
Therefore, now in modern times, it may be rightly said “If Yahweh Lord of the Bible , be the one True God follow Him. Yet if Allah the lord of Islam be the one true god then follow him.” The case is very clear cut.
There is the Christian site http://www.answering-islam.org
Lon Spector says
Why should that surprise anyone? He doesn’t represent the interests of the Londoner.
He is a subversive, illegal alien who encourages the genocide and cucking of the English
(man?) and the sexual abuse and enslavement of the English woman.
Satan works under the guise of “civil rights,” and doing “good.” The devil has the European
hypnotised towards suicide.
nicu says
Where was he when HIS people killed innocent people in London ????
I also don’t get why he is Mayor
James says
He was elected Mayor of London, in 2016. Here is an article about it:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_mayoral_election,_2016
MAJack says
Kahn is an absolute Islamist turd, he’s a Manchurian candidate.
Frank says
And this guy got to be mayor of LONDON how, exactly?
A European says
Well, let’s take a closer look at the so-called Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC), a co-organiser of the al-Quds march in London. Islamic Human Rights… isn’t this a contradiction in terms? Article 24 of the Cairo Declaration of Human Rights states that ” all the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to islamic shari’ah, meaning that human rights can be repealed if they contradict shari’ah law. So, if you deal with front groups like the IHRC, remember always that their understanding of human rights is marked by that Cairo Declaration, it is binding for them.
Founded in 1997 as a pro-Iranian and anti-Zionist “human rights’ group, its activists opposed vehemently a directive from the EU which had been backed by the British government. This directive invited Muslim charities and educational establishments to employ homosexuals and non-Muslims. What the heck is wrong about hiring homosexuals or non-believers? If these activists from IHRC were genuinely advocating human rights, they should stand up for homosexuals and non-Muslims, making sure that they can be employed. In 2015, just a few days after the staff of Charlie Hebdo ( a french satirical Magazine) had been almost wiped out by two jihadists, IRHC had the effrontery to give their spoof award “islamophobe of the year” to the dead staff, regretting duplicitously and spitefully that nobody of the staff had come to collect the award. And now, these stooges of Hezbollah co-run the al-Quds march in London, a display of rabid anti:Semitism and jihadist warfare. Damnable organisations like IHRC misuse the language of human rights, they are a travesty of human rights, a bunch of cronies who are throwing stun grenades while their friends with high-explovise shells are closing in.
Lucia Bartoli says
Short and sweet — “F” the idolater mayor