For years, Islamic advocacy groups such as the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) have wildly exaggerated the incidence of anti-Muslim hate crime, often misrepresenting crimes committed by Muslims themselves as anti-Muslim hate crimes, in order to portray Muslims in the U.S. as victims of widespread persecution. In reality, FBI statistics show that Jews are twice as likely to be victims of hate crimes as Muslims.
The objective is clearly to deflect counter-terror efforts, claiming that Muslims are more victimized than victimizer, and that counter-terror efforts are part of that victimization. Hamas-linked CAIR actually wants and needs hate crimes against Muslims, because they’re the currency they use to buy power and influence in our victimhood-oriented society, and to deflect attention away from jihad terror and onto Muslims as putative victims. Hamas-linked CAIR, designated a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates, and other Muslims have on many occasions not hesitated to stoop even to fabricating “hate crimes,” including attacks on mosques. The larger strategy is to paint a picture of Muslims as being harassed and persecuted in the U.S., and deserving of law enforcement protection, not law enforcement scrutiny. If that strategy succeeds, the jihad will be able to advance unopposed and unimpeded, with no one daring to say a negative word about the poor victims. Until, that is, it is far, far too late.
In this case, however, even the victim herself is denying the “Islamophobic hate crime” narrative.
“Police Report Contradicts ‘Hate Crime’ Narrative In Milwaukee Attack On Muslim Woman,” by Chuck Ross, Daily Caller, June 26, 2017 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
A Muslim woman who was attacked by a stranger in Milwaukee in April told police that she did not believe that she was targeted because of her religion, a statement which is at odds with how her story was portrayed in the media by local and national Muslim civil rights groups.
“In this attack of the Muslim woman, we know of no evidence that would indicate that this attack was anything but a hate crime,” Munjed Ahmad, a lawyer for the woman and board member of American Muslims for Palestine, claimed at a press conference held on April 14, four days after the 58-year-old woman was assaulted while walking home from prayer services at the Islamic Society of Milwaukee.
But police incident reports, obtained by TheDC through an open records request, paint a different picture.
The documents show that in the days after her April 10 attack, the woman told detectives that she “disagreed” with media reports claiming that she was the victim of a hate crime attack.
The woman, whose name is redacted in police reports, told investigators that she did not believe she was attacked because she is Muslim. Instead, she suspected that the assault had something to do with her estranged daughter, who had just divorced her husband and entered a relationship with another woman.
Despite those statements to police, Ahmad and groups like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Milwaukee Muslim Women’s Coalition and the left-wing Jewish Voice for Peace, all called the incident a hate crime. Milwaukee government officials echoed the claim.
“I call for this to be investigated and prosecuted as a hate crime,” Milwaukee county supervisor Jason Haas said at the April 14 press conference organized by Ahmad, who is also a board member of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee.
“It concerns us tremendously because what we’re seeing again is specifically attacks and hate targeting Muslim women,” Janan Najeeb, the president of the Milwaukee Muslim Women’s Coalition, said at the event….
“[Redacted] stated she does not feel she was attacked because she is Muslim. It should be noted that contrary to what was reported on the news, according to [redacted], the man who attacked her did not try to take her hijab,” the incident report reads.
The woman’s comments to police about her hijab do appear to conflict with statements she made in TV interviews on April 11 and April 12. In one, the woman suggested that her attacker did go for her hijab.
“I tried to fight him. Do not take my hijab, you know,” she told Milwaukee’s Fox6Now in an April 11 interview.
The attacker did not leave with the hijab, which ended up covered in blood from the assault.
In her April 13 police interview, the woman again said that she believed the assault was linked to her daughter.
“She stated she doesn’t approve of her daughter’s lifestyle and she is appalled by the fact that her daughter recently left her husband and she is now in a lesbian relationship with another woman,” the report reads.
“She feels that is why she was targeted.”…
Emilie Green says
“‘that her daughter recently left her husband and she is now in a lesbian relationship with another woman,’ the report reads.”
From what I’ve learned about this religion of lunacy and its ridiculous notions of honor, aren’t those facts alone sufficient to bring dishonor, thereby entitling male relatives to murder this errant daughter?
lebel says
We call this double taqqiya, its an attempt to make the naive infidel that some Muslims are honest.
Matthieu Baudin says
Hey lebel, some individuals who are Muslim have a commitment to honesty that extends to their treatment of non Muslims. There are probably several ways in which this comes about. Of course that doesn’t detract from the widespread problem of taqqiya, which is an ever present frustration.
mohamonator says
The attacker has not been apprehended or even identified, but CAIR and the rest of the mohammedan victimhood industry ALREADY know his motive. What accounts for such extraordinary clairvoyance? Perhaps a revelation from the “the perfect one”?
somehistory says
Generally when someone is attacked, assaulted, etc., by a stranger the police will ask the victim, “Do you know anyone who would want to hurt you? Do you know who would do this, or pay to have it done?”
The woman likely knows who did it and why but doesn’t want to say for fear of retaliation.
The average person is at risk, to some degree, of being beaten, assaulted, for various reasons. But, when it is a moslum, it must always be because that person is moslum.
Just shows that moslums know they advocate evil and normal people don’t like evil. So they pretend attacks, and when attacks are real, for whatever reason and from whomever the attack comes, they try to insert the *hate*…cause they know islum is hateable. islum deserves hatred and they know it. Therefore, they try to use that to their evil advantage over the population.
St. Croix says
They love to point out that the victims are Muslim, but if there are Muslims committing assaults, this fact must be denied. They might be described as males aged 40 years old, or “Asians” but never is it permitted to reveal that a Muslim committed an assault.
But if the victim is Muslim, the religious identity of MUSLIM is plastered all over the news because it’s that terrible scourge called “Islamophobia” you see!
How can grown people with brains use this kind of double standard and pretend it makes sense?
billybob says
Muslims do feel under siege, but not for the reasons they give. It’s not the fake “Islamophobic attacks” on Muslims that have them claiming victimhood. It is the attacks on their religion that are hitting them where they are most vulnerable and unable to defend themselves, because Islam is indefensible.
Muslims living in the West as a minority are surrounded by illumination from without that reveals the spiritual poverty of their religion. Wrapped in the 7th century garb, they are like a slum on the hillside in a modern, thriving metropolis, like an ugly stain on the fabric of modern society, like a wart on a nose, like a festering ulcer on the foot of a diabetic, like a cancer of the liver.
Islam is a failed religion, unable to meet the spiritual needs of its adherents. With it’s glaring contradictions and inverted morality, it provides no spiritual sustenance. It is empty of “spiritual calories”. Islam also happens to be a way of life and a complete system of governance. In that too it fails, because it is incapable of providing justice for its people, and it fails to provide a way to live at peace with its neighbours.
In Muslim lands, for most of its existence, Islam was a fortress. Strict laws against blasphemy and apostasy protected it from criticism and spared Islam from the critical analyses that would have completely undermined it, like a house build on sand in a flood. Hostility and aggression to outsiders and foreign ideas was the firewall between the fortress of Islam and the outside world, allowing the inhabitants to remain frozen in time, trapped in the 7th century with no hope of escape.
Transport these same Muslims to the West and suddenly there are no walls to protect them. They become exposed, like a caterpillar ripped from its cocoon, like a baby ripped from its womb. They are soft, fragile, and exposed, exposed to thoughts and ideas that are forbidden, exposed to enriching ideas that entice them like a feast spread out before a faster. Worst of all they become aware of the glaring flaws of their religion that wants to explode from its own internal contradictions. Caught like a deer in the headlights of an onrushing car, they stand there paralyzed, unable to move. They try to retreat into their ghettos and mosques, but the world invades them even there – radio, television, the classroom, and the Internet.
The last of these, the Internet, is the enemy of their worst nightmares. It creeps into their homes and attacks them where they should feel most secure, bringing thoughts and ideas that threaten to turn them inside out. It attacks and destroys the false logic that glues together their world view and leaves them with only two choices – live with the cognitive dissonance that would force them in the end to leave Islam, or retreat deeper into it. Shut it off, or just use it to watch YouTube videos by Imams calling them back to the 7th century when Muhammad ruled in all his terrible glory.
Of course they feel they are victims! But it is their own karma catching up with them. “Islamophobic attacks” are merely projections of their own demons attacking them, their own forbidden thoughts haunting them.
******
More Ham Ed says
Council for
Advancing
Islamic
Radicals
Beagle says
It appears the Muslim pressure groups are trying to accomplish two goals at the same time, by covering up Islamic so-called honor crimes through faking hate crimes. It’s rather ingenious, deceit wise.